- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 260515, 13 pages
A Comparison of Two Dust Uplift Schemes within the Same General Circulation Model
1Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6BB, UK
2Monash Weather and Climate, Monash University, VIC, Clayton 3800, Australia
3National Centres for Atmospheric Science (Climate), University of Reading, Reading RG6 6BB, UK
4Met Office, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK
Received 1 December 2011; Revised 12 April 2012; Accepted 9 May 2012
Academic Editor: Ralph A. Kahn
Copyright © 2012 Duncan Ackerley et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citations to this Article [2 citations]
The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.
- Amanda C. Maycock, Manoj M. Joshi, Keith P. Shine, and Adam A. Scaife, “The Circulation Response to Idealized Changes in Stratospheric Water Vapor,” Journal of Climate, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 545–561, 2013.
- Peter O. Hopcroft, Paul J. Valdes, Stephanie Woodward, and Manoj M. Joshi, “Last glacial maximum radiative forcing from mineral dust aerosols in an Earth system model,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2015.