Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2016, Article ID 4572498, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4572498
Research Article

Development and Application of Urban Landslide Vulnerability Assessment Methodology Reflecting Social and Economic Variables

1Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
2Department of Ocean Engineering, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
3Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
4Department of Environmental Engineering, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea

Received 23 December 2015; Revised 29 March 2016; Accepted 7 June 2016

Academic Editor: Philip Ward

Copyright © 2016 Yoonkyung Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Lee, J.-H. Ryu, J.-S. Won, and H.-J. Park, “Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network,” Engineering Geology, vol. 71, no. 3-4, pp. 289–302, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K.-Y. Song, H.-J. Oh, J. Choi, I. Park, C. Lee, and S. Lee, “Prediction of landslides using ASTER imagery and data mining models,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 978–993, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Smith and R. Ward, Floods: Physical Processes and Human Impacts, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1998.
  4. S. L. Cutter, B. J. Boruff, and W. L. Shirley, “Social vulnerability to environmental hazards,” Social Science Quarterly, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 242–261, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Galli and F. Guzzetti, “Landslide vulnerability criteria: a case study from Umbria, Central Italy,” Environmental Management, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 649–664, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Kang and Y. Kim, “The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events,” Natural Hazards, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 1475–1493, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Z. Li, F. Nadim, H. Huang, M. Uzielli, and S. Lacasse, “Quantitative vulnerability estimation for scenario-based landslide hazards,” Landslides, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. L. Carreño, O. D. Cardona, and A. H. Barbat, “A disaster risk management performance index,” Natural Hazards, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Dwyer, C. Zoppou, O. Nielsen, S. Day, and S. Roberts, Quantifying Social Vulnerability: A Methodology for Identifying Those at Risk to Natural Hazards, Australian Government, Geoscience Australia, Symonston, Australia, 2004.
  10. Y. Park, S. Jeong, and S. Kim, “Natural disaster vulnerability assessment at boroughs and census output areas in seoul focusing on socio-economic perspective,” Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 439–449, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. T. H. Siagian, P. Purhadi, S. Suhartono, and H. Ritonga, “Social vulnerability to natural hazards in Indonesia: driving factors and policy implications,” Natural Hazards, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 1603–1617, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Statistical Geographic Information Service (SGIS), 2015, http://sgis.kostat.go.kr.
  13. P. Horton, M. Jaboyedoff, B. Rudaz, and M. Zimmermann, “Flow-R, a model for susceptibility mapping of debris flows and other gravitational hazards at a regional scale,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 869–885, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Holmgren, “Multiple flow direction algorithms for runoff modelling in grid based elevation models: an empirical evaluation,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 327–334, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Safeland, “Living with landslide risk in Europe: assessment, effects of global change, and risk management strategies,” Deliverable D7.5 GIS-based training package on landslide risk assessment Work Package 7—Dissemination of project results, 2012.
  16. S. Fuchs, K. Heiss, and J. Hübl, “Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 495–506, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. D. Haugen and A. M. Kaynia, “Vulnerability of structures impacted by debris flow,” in Landslides and Engineered Slopes, Z. Chen, J. M. Zhang, K. Ho, F. Q. Wu, and Z. K. Li, Eds., pp. 381–387, Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  18. B. Quan Luna, J. Blahut, C. J. van Westen, S. Sterlacchini, T. W. J. van Asch, and S. O. Akbas, “The application of numerical debris flow modelling for the generation of physical vulnerability curves,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2047–2060, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Safeland, “Living with landslide risk in Europe: assessment, effects of global change, and risk management strategies,” Deliverable D2.6 Methodology for evaluation of the socio-economic impact of landslides (socio-economic vulnerability), 2012.
  20. Y. Park, J. Kim, D. J. Jo, and S. Kim, “Urban mud and debris flow disaster vulnerability assessment associated with landslide hazard map: application to Busan, Korea,” Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 283–289, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. U. M. K. Eidsvig, A. McLean, B. V. Vangelsten et al., “Assessment of socioeconomic vulnerability to landslides using an indicator-based approach: methodology and case studies,” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 307–324, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. L. Saaty, “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–281, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Tapsell, S. Tunstall, C. Green, and A. Fernandez, “Social indicator set,” FLOODsite Report T11-07-01, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Ebert, N. Kerle, and A. Stein, “Urban social vulnerability assessment with physical proxies and spatial metrics derived from air- and spaceborne imagery and GIS data,” Natural Hazards, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 275–294, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Steinführer, B. De Marchi, C. Kuhlicke, A. Scolobig, S. Tapsell, and S. Tunstall, “Vulnerability, resilience and social constructions of flood risk in exposed communities,” FLOODsite Report T11-07-12, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  27. B. Q. Luna, J. Blahut, C. Camera et al., “Physically based dynamic run-out modelling for quantitative debris flow risk assessment: a case study in Tresenda, northern Italy,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 645–661, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Gaprindashvili and C. J. Van Westen, “Generation of a national landslide hazard and risk map for the country of Georgia,” Natural Hazards, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 69–101, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus