Research Article  Open Access
The Thermal Statistics of QuasiProbabilities’ Analogs in Phase Space
Abstract
We focus attention upon the thermal statistics of the classical analogs of quasiprobabilities (QP) in phase space for the important case of quadratic Hamiltonians. We consider the three more important OPs: Wigner’s, , and Husimi’s. We show that, for all of them, the ensuing semiclassical entropy is a function only of the fluctuation product . We ascertain that the semiclassical analog of distribution seems to become unphysical at very low temperatures. The behavior of several other information quantifiers reconfirms such an assertion in manifold ways. We also examine the behavior of the statistical complexity and of thermal quantities like the specific heat.
1. Introduction
A quasiprobability distribution is a mathematical construction that resembles a probability distribution but does not necessarily fulfill some of Kolmogorov’s axioms for probabilities [1]. Quasiprobabilities exhibit general features of ordinary probabilities. Most importantly, they yield expectation values with respect to the weights of the distribution. However, they disobey the third probability postulate [1] in the sense that regions integrated under them do not represent probabilities of mutually exclusive states. Some quasiprobability distributions exhibit zones of negative probability density. This kind of distributions often arises in the study of quantum mechanics when discussed in a phase space representation of frequent use in quantum optics, timefrequency analysis, and so forth.
One usually considers a density operator defined with respect to a complete orthonormal basis and shows that it can always be written in a diagonal manner, provided that an overcomplete basis is at hand [2]. This is the case of coherent states [3], for which [2]We have , with and being phase space variables. Coherent states, right eigenstates of the annihilation operator , serve as the overcomplete basis in such a buildup [2, 3].
There exists a family of different representations, each connected to a different ordering of the creation and destruction operators and . Historically, the first of these is the Wigner quasiprobability distribution [4], related to symmetric operator ordering. In quantum optics the particle number operator is naturally expressed in normal order and in the pertinent scenario the associated representation of the phase space distribution is the GlauberSudarshan one [3]. In addition to and , one may find many other quasiprobability distributions emerging in alternative representations of the phase space distribution [5]. A quite popular representation is the Husimi one [6–9], used when operators are in antinormal order. We emphasize that we work here with classical analogs of , and . As stated, we will specialize things to the three functions associated to a Harmonic Oscillator (HO) of angular frequency . In such a scenario the three (classical analog) functions that we call for convenience , , and are just Gaussians. The pertinent treatment becomes wholly analytical.
1.1. Our Goal
In this paper, we wish to apply semiclassical information theory tools associated with these analog , , and representations (for quadratic Hamiltonians) in order to describe the associated thermal semiclassical features. The idea is to gain physical insight from the application of different information quantifiers to classical analogs of quasiprobability distributions. It will be seen that useful insights are in this way gained. WE will discover that, out of the three functions, only and are sensible analogs, while exhibits problems if the temperature is low enough.
We insist that, in this paper, we will regard quasiprobabilities as semiclassical distributions in phase space, analogs of the quantum quasiprobabilistic distributions, and try to ascertain what physical features they are able to describe at such semiclassical level. One has [10, 11]where , is the Boltzmann constant, and is the temperature. They will be used as semiclassical statistical weight functions. Since ours is not a quantum approach, the ordering of HOcreation and destruction operators and plays no role whatsoever.
1.2. Historic Considerations and Organization
The thermodynamics properties associated with coherent states have been the subject of much interest. See, for instance, [12, 13]. Notice that HO is a really relevant system that yields useful insights of wide impact. Indeed, HO constitutes much more than a mere example. It is of special relevance for bosonic or fermionic atoms contained in magnetic traps [14–16] and for system that exhibits an equidistant level spacing in the vicinity of the ground state, like nuclei or Luttinger liquids.
For thermal states, the Gaussian HOquantum phase spaces distributions are known in the literature for applications in quantum optics.
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 refers to different information quantifiers in a phase space representation for Gaussian distributions. In Section 3 we calculate the classical analog Fano factor. Features of the fluctuations are analyzed in Section 4. Additionally, we discuss the notion of linear entropy. Finally, some conclusions are drawn in Section 5.
2. Semiclassical Information Quantifiers
Consider a general normalized gaussian distribution in phase space whose normalized variance is with taking values , , and . We discuss next, in these terms, some important information theory quantifiers.
2.1. ShiftInvariant Fisher’s Information Measure
The information quantifier Fisher’s information measure, specialized for families of shiftinvariant distributions, which do not change shape under translations, is [17, 18] and, in phase space, it adopts the appearance [19] such that considering given by (3) we get , whose specific values are , , and for the three functions , , and . The behavior of these quantities is displayed in Figure 1. The solid line is the case , the dashed one is the Wigner one, and the dotted curve is assigned to the Husimi case. Now, it is known that in the present scenario the maximum attainable value for equals 2 [19]. The result violates this restriction at low temperatures more precisely atwith being expressed in units.
2.2. Logarithmic Entropy
The logarithmic Boltzmann’s information measure for the the probability distribution (3) isso that it acquires the particular values for, respectively, the distributions , , and . These entropies are plotted in Figure 2. Notice that for . Negative classical entropies are well known. As an example, one can cite [20].
(a)
(b)
Table 1 lists a set of critical temperatures for typical electromagnetic (EM) waves.

We see from Table 1 that serious anomalies are detected for distribution in the case of radio waves of high frequency. becomes negative, which is absurd, for rather high temperatures, where one expects classical physics to reign. Accordingly, one concludes that quasiprobabilities do not exhibit a sensible classical limit in case contrary to what happens in both and ones.
2.3. Statistical Complexity
The statistical complexity , according to LópezRuiz et al. [21], is a suitable product of two quantifiers such that becomes minimal at the extreme situations of perfect order or total randomness. Instead of using the prescription of [21], but without violating its spirit, we will take one of these two quantifiers to be Fisher’s measure and take the other to be an entropic form, since it is well known that the two behave in opposite manner [22]. Thus which vanishes for perfect order or total randomness. For each particular case, we explicitly havefor, respectively, the distributions , , and . The maximum of the statistical complexity occurs when and the associated temperature values are
The statistical complexity is plotted in Figure 3.
2.4. Linear Entropy
Another interesting information quantifier is that of the ManfrediFeix entropy [23], derived from the phase space Tsallis entropy [24]. In quantum information this form is referred to as the linear entropy [25]. It readsAccordingly, we haveThis is semiclassical result, which is valid for small . In particular, Note that in the instance the linear entropy becomes negative once again for . Contrary to what happens for the logarithmic entropy, the linear one can vanish in representation. The lineal entropies are plotted in Figure 4.
(a)
(b)
The ensuing statistical complexity that uses becomes vanishing for both and , the extreme values of physical range (we showed above that cannot exceed 2 without violating uncertainty restrictions).
3. Fano Factor’s Classical Analog
In general, the Fano factor is the coefficient of dispersion of the probability distribution , which is defined as [26] where is the variance and is the mean of a random process .
If is a Poisson distribution then one sees that the pertinent Fano factor becomes unity () [10, 27]. We remind the reader of two situations:(1)For , subPoissonian processes occur.(2)For , the process is superPoissonian.
For our Gaussian distribution (3), if one sets now , one has the classical Fano analogwhere the expectation value of the function is calculated as indicating that is the statistical weight function. Thus, after computing the mean values involved in (22) by taking into account definition (23), the Fano factor becomes which, for a Gaussian distribution, links the Fano factor to the distribution’s width and to Fisher’s measure . We are speaking of processes that are of a quantum nature and cannot take place in a classical environment. Thus, with reference to the critical temperature defined in (6), we have to deal with
The case reaches the super to subPoissonian transition only at , while the other two cases reach it at finite temperatures.
4. Fluctuations
We start this section considering the classical Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator that reads where and are phase space variables, , , and [28].
Using the definition of the mean value (23), from (26), we immediately find [29] with where , while takes the respective values , , and . The concomitant variances are and . Hence, for our general Gaussian distribution, one easily establishes that which shows that should be constrained by the restriction if one wishes the inequality to hold.
Specializing (29) for our three quasiprobability distributions yields These fluctuations are plotted in Figure 5. The restriction (31) applied to the result entails that it holds if Thus, the distribution seems again to become unphysical at temperatures lower than , for which (31) is violated. From (29), we have . Accordingly, if we insert this into (7), the logarithmic entropy can be recast in terms via the relation (also demonstrated in [30] to hold for the Wehrl entropy) which vanishes for In the instance this happens at At this temperature Heisenberg’slike condition (31) is violated. and distributions do not allow for such a circumstance. Actually, in the Wigner case, which is exact, the minimum value is attained at , where The uncertainty restriction (31) seems to impede the phase space entropy to vanish, a sort of quasiquantum effect. It is clear then that, in phase space, the logarithmic entropy, by itself, is an uncertainty indicator, in agreement with the work, in other scenarios, of several authors (see, for instance, [31] and references therein).
Define now the participation ratio’s analog as [32, 33] where is given by (17). This is an important quantity that measures the number of pure states entering the mixture determined by our general Gaussian probability distribution of amplitude [32, 33]. We again encounter troubles with the distribution in this respect. It is immediately realized by looking at Figure 6 that, for fulfilling the obvious condition , one needs a temperature .
5. Conclusions
We have investigated here the thermal statistics of quasiprobabilities’ analogs in phase space for the important case of quadratic Hamiltonians, focusing attention on the three more important instances, that is, those of Wigner, , and Husimi distributions:(i)We emphasized the fact that for all of them the semiclassical entropy is a function only of the fluctuation product . This fact allows one to ascertain that the analog distribution seems to become unphysical at low enough temperatures, smaller than a critical value , because, in such an instance(1)it would violate Heisenberg’slike principle in such a case. The behavior of other information quantifiers reconfirms such an assertion; that is,(2)Fisher’s measure exceeds its permissible maximum value ;(3)the participation ratio becomes , which is impossible.(ii)It is also clear then that semiclassical entropy, by itself, in phase space, looks like a kind of “uncertainty” indicator.(iii)We have determined the temperatures for which the statistical complexity becomes maximal as a signature of the wellknown transition between classical and nonclassical states of light whose signature is the transition from superPoissonian to subPoissonian distributions [34].
We have seen that the distribution in the case of radio waves of high frequency becomes negative, which is absurd, as the pertinent temperatures are rather high and thus one expects classical physics to reign. Accordingly, one concludes that quasiprobabilities do not exhibit a sensible classical limit in the case, contrary to what happens in both and ones.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors were supported by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina. Useful discussions with Professor R. Piasecki of Opole’s University, Poland, are gratefully acknowledged.
References
 J. Von Plato, “Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung,” in Landmark Writings in Western Mathematics, I. GrattanGuinness, Ed., pp. 960–969, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 E. C. Sudarshan, “Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 10, pp. 277–279, 1963. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 R. J. Glauber, “Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,” Physical Review, vol. 131, pp. 2766–2788, 1963. View at: Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 E. P. Wigner, “On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,” Physical Review, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 749–759, 1932. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Pennini and A. Plastino, “Smoothed Wignerdistributions, decoherence, and the temperaturedependence of the classicalquantum frontier,” The European Physical Journal D, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 241–247, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Husimi, “Some formal properties of the density matrix,” Proceedings of the PhysicoMathematical Society of Japan, vol. 22, pp. 264–283, 1940. View at: Google Scholar
 S. S. Mizrahi, “Quantum mechanics in the Gaussian wavepacket phase space representation,” Physica A, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 241–264, 1984. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 S. S. Mizrahi, “Quantum mechanics in the Gaussian wavepacket phase space representation. II. Dynamics,” Physica A. Statistical and Theoretical Physics, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 237–250, 1986. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 S. S. Mizrahi, “Quantum mechanics in the Gaussian wavepacket phase space representation III: from phase space probability functions to wavefunctions,” Physica A, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 541–554, 1988. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
 W. P. Scheleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space, Wiley, Berlin, Germany, 2001.
 J.P. Gazeau, Coherent States in Quantum Physics, WileyVCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2009.
 E. H. Lieb, “The classical limit of quantum spin systems,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 31, pp. 327–340, 1973. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, “Observation of BoseEinstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor,” Science, vol. 269, no. 5221, pp. 198–201, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. B. Davis, M.O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews et al., “BoseEinstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, no. 22, pp. 3969–3973, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. C. Bradley, C. A. Sackett, and R. G. Hulet, “BoseEinstein condensation of lithium: observation of limited condensate number,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 985–989, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. R. Frieden and B. H. Soffer, “Lagrangians of physics and the game of Fisherinformation transfer,” Physical Review E, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 2274–2286, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. J. W. Hall, “Quantum properties of classical Fisher information,” Physical Review A, vol. 62, no. 1, Article ID 012107, 6 pages, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 F. Pennini and A. Plastino, “Fluctuations, entropic quantifiers and classicalquantum transition,” Entropy, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1178–1190, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. H. Lieb, “Proof of an entropy conjecture of Wehrl,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 1978. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 R. LópezRuiz, H. L. Mancini, and X. A. Calbet, “A statistical measure of complexity,” Physics Letters A, vol. 209, no. 56, pp. 321–326, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. R. Frieden, Science from Fisher Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  MathSciNet
 G. Manfredi and M. R. Feix, “Entropy and Wigner functions,” Physical Review E, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 4665–4674, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Tsallis, Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at: MathSciNet
 P. Sadeghi, S. Khademi, and A. H. Darooneh, “Tsallis entropy in phasespace quantum mechanics,” Physical Review A, vol. 86, no. 1, Article ID 012119, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 U. Fano, “Ionization yield of radiations. II. The fluctuations of the number of ions,” Physical Review, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 26–29, 1947. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Brif and Y. BenAryeh, “Subcoherent Prepresentation for nonclassical photon states,” Journal of the European Optical Society B: Quantum Optics, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 391–396, 1994. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. K. Pathria, Statistical Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Exeter, UK, 1993.
 F. Pennini and A. Plastino, “HeisenbergFisher thermal uncertainty measure,” Physical Review E, vol. 69, no. 5, Article ID 057101, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Anderson and J. J. Halliwell, “Informationtheoretic measure of uncertainty due to quantum and thermal fluctuations,” Physical Review D, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 2753–2765, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 I. BiałynickiBirula and J. Mycielski, “Uncertainty relations for information entropy in wave mechanics,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 129–132, 1975. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 J. Batle, A. R. Plastino, M. Casas, and A. Plastino, “Conditional qentropies and quantum separability: a numerical exploration,” Journal of Physics A:Mathematical and General, vol. 35, no. 48, pp. 10311–10324, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 F. Pennini, A. Plastino, and G. L. Ferri, “Semiclassical information from deformed and escort information measures,” Physica A, vol. 383, no. 2, pp. 782–796, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 X. T. Zou and L. Mandel, “Photonantibunching and subPoissonian photon statistics,” Physical Review A, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 475–476, 1990. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 F. Pennini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.