Research Article  Open Access
E. Güler, M. Güler, "Geometry Optimization Calculations for the Elasticity of Gold at High Pressure", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 525673, 5 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/525673
Geometry Optimization Calculations for the Elasticity of Gold at High Pressure
Abstract
We present embedded atom method based geometry optimization aspects of pressure effect on some elastic and mechanical properties of gold. During study, we determined the pressure dependency of equilibrium volume, typical cubic elastic constants, bulk modulus, shear modulus, young modulus, and elastic wave velocities of the considered metal with varying pressure between 0 GPa and 1000 GPa. Finally, we carried out a benchmark between our results and other available theoretical calculations and experimental data. The results of the study mutually agree with the previous findings and provide a deeper outlook for high pressure behavior of the studied metal.
1. Introduction
The effect of pressure on the propagation of elastic waves in materials is essential for predicting and understanding some physical properties comprising the interatomic forces, mechanical stability, phase transition mechanisms, dynamic fracture, earthquakes, and the internal structures of Earth. Unfortunately, there is not much experimental information about the elasticity of solids at high pressure, since measurement of the elastic constants is challenging under high pressure.
The two traditional experimental methods for moderate pressures are ultrasonic technique and Brillouin spectroscopy measurements. From these methods, ultrasonic methods utilize a few gigapascals (GPa) where Brillouin spectroscopy measurements are limited to 25 GPa [1]. Furthermore, gold (Au) is often used as an internal pressure calibrant for high pressure studies, because of its stable nature over wide temperature and pressure ranges. Au is also chemically inert, compressible, and displays a simple Xray diffraction pattern. However, as reported by Matsui there has been much debate especially on the pressurevolumetemperature (PVT) equation of state (EOS) of Au, even at room temperature. Also, estimated pressure differences between proposed EOSs often reach more than 10% with respect to experiments [2]. Therefore, to overcome the experimental limitations, computational researches on the high pressure characteristics of Au are particularly critical for ongoing academic studies and still current research topics [3–6].
Over the past few decades, computer simulation techniques have become an important tool in science as an aid to the interpretation of experimental data for yielding an atomic level model [7]. Notably, two popular calculation methods, namely, classical physics based molecular dynamics (MD) and quantummechanics based density functional theory (DFT) methods, play a major role on the materials science and condensed matter scene to get reliable results on the physical properties of metals being dependent to accurate interatomic potentials [8]. For instance, embedded atom method (EAM) and its potentials are wellknown schemes for the atomistic simulations of metallic materials [9–11]. In the early 1980s, Daw and Baskes introduced EAM for calculating the ground state properties of realistic metal systems to remove the insufficiency of pairwise potentials [12], and, afterwards, researchers applied this semiemprical method extensively with various types of many improved body potentials for distinct physical problems in metallic systems. Exemplarily, FinnisSinclair type EAM potentials adequately explain the elastic and defect properties of base centered cubic (bcc) metals [13, 14], whereas SuttonChen type EAM is a proper alternative for face centered cubic (fcc) metals for atomistic calculations [15]. Noteworthy to mention here, the use of EAM with geometry optimization calculations with General Utility Lattice Program (GULP) code reveals veracious research results on some versatile features of metals such as bulk modulus, elastic constants, and elastic moduli [16, 17].
In the present study, we focus on clarifying the individual high pressure elastic constants of Au by EAM based geometry optimization calculations. The main purpose of this study is not only to provide results that can be used to evaluate quantitatively the high pressure elasticity of Au from 0 GPa up to 1000 GPa, but also to contribute to enlightening the abovementioned doubts on Au.
2. Computational Procedure
During this computational study, we performed all calculations using General Utility Lattice Program (GULP) code 4.0. This simulation code allows performing widerange property calculations for 3D periodic solids, 2D surfaces and gas phase clusters, and so forth. Besides, this code also allows the use of twobody, threebody, fourbody, sixbody, and many body (EAM) potentials depending on demands of research. Most calculations in GULP code consist of the optimization of a trial structure to the local energy minimum, under given conditions of pressure and temperature. Moreover, several types of standard minimization techniques are available in GULP. The two common techniques are to optimize the related structures at constant pressure, in which all internal and cell variables are included or at constant volume, where the unit cell remains frozen [16, 17]. So, we applied a constant pressure optimization for the Au. The geometry of the studied cells was optimized by the NewtonRaphson method [21] based on the Hessian matrix calculated from the second derivatives. The Hessian matrix is recursively updated during optimization using the BroydenFletcherGoldfarbShanno algorithm [22–25]. We employed SuttonChen type EAM potential to study fcc Au metal, under periodic boundary conditions with a temperature configuration at Kelvin. Then, we increased the pressure from 0 GPa to 1000 GPa in the steps of 200 GPa with a lattice constant = 4.08 Å for Au. Following the EAM based optimization results for Au, we particularly concentrated on some elastic parameters such as typical cubic elastic constants (, , and ), bulk modulus (), shear modulus (), young modulus (), longitudinal sound velocity (), and shear velocity () of this metal for the studied pressure range where all these physical parameters are circumstantiated in very recent study of authors [26]. At the end of our calculations we presented a benchmark between our results and earlier experimental and DFT findings of fcc Au.
3. Results and Discussion
Since it is not possible get data on the EOS of Au up to 1000 GPa experimentally, we deliberately focused on the former theoretical results from the literature. Figure 1 shows PV diagram of Au. In Figure 1 the circle symbols represent our present calculation data where squares show the molecular dynamics results of Çiftci et al. [5]. In addition, diamonds symbols stand for Matsuis data [2], and triangles belong to Yokoo et al. calculations [27]. As it is obvious from Figure 1, our present results on the PV diagram of Au are very close to molecular dynamics data in [5] and cover both the Matsuis findings and Yokoo’s data in which Yokoo and his coworkers calculations also subsumed the electronicfree energy contribution. As a result, our data strongly supports previous findings on the EOS of Au and show significant similarities on the PV curve.
Figure 2 represents the typical elastic constants (, , and ) of Au at the pressure interval between 0 GPa and 150 GPa where the authors could be able to make a comparison between current results and former experimental data and DFT values. The closed circles in Figure 2 indicate the present calculations while opencrossed circles denote experimental data of Duffy et al. [28] and squares show Greeff and Graf DFT data [29]. It is quite clear in Figure 2 that our elastic constant data, appears in the range of both experimental and DFT data except the little disagreement of . Additionally, Figure 3 outlines the pressure dependency of the elastic constants in the 0 GPa–1000 GPa range obtained during this research. As seen in Figure 3, the calculated values of , , and elastic constants are positive and exhibit a smooth increment as a function of the increasing pressure. Besides, the increment of the elastic constant is higher than both elastic constants and . Physically, describes the longitudinal elastic behavior, whereas and portray the offdiagonal and shear elastic characteristic of cubic crystals related with shearing, respectively. So, a longitudinal strain produces a change in volume without a change in shape. This volume change is highly related to pressure and thus reflects a large change in . On the other hand, a transverse strain or shearing causes a change in shape without a change in volume. Therefore, and are less sensitive to pressure when compared with .
Figure 4 displays the behavior of three elastic moduli (B, G, and E) of Au for the applied pressure range. From the prevalent physical definition of bulk modulus , an increment for is expected due to its direct proportionality to applied pressure. Thus, it is visible in Figure 4 that bulk modulus of Au represents a straight increment as expected. In this regard, the other elastic moduli G and E depending strictly on bulk modulus also expose similar behavior in Figure 4. The behavior of these curves is also consistent within the former results of moderating pressures in metals and alloys.
Pressure effect on the longitudinal sound velocity () and shear velocity () of Au up to 1000 GPa can be seen in Figure 5. Under high pressure both of the sound velocities display an increment trend with the increasing of pressure; this characteristic confirms the former findings of pressure effect on both and [30]. When compared with each other has a more uniform increasing fashion than .
An additional comparison is given in Tables 1 and 2 for the present typical cubic elastic constants , , and and other calculated parameters, respectively. As seen in Table 1, our obtained values for , , and are reasonable when compared with the experimental measurements. On the other hand, Table 2 summarizes the present and former experimental results (originally extrapolated from 4 Kelvin measurements) of , , , , and constants for Kelvin and GPa. From a more physical perspective, from Tables 1 and 2, it is easy to see the existence of traditional Born mechanical (dynamical) stability conditions (P = 0 GPa); , , , , and [18] for Au over the entire pressure range.

Apparently our presently calculated data shows a fair consistency again for all considered parameters and their related characteristics under high pressures.
4. Conclusion
In summary, we surveyed the effect of pressure on several mechanical and elastic properties of Au metal with embedded atom model by geometry optimization calculations. As an outcome, the obtained findings put forth reasonable results for the high pressure behavior of Au when compared with the other experimental, molecular dynamics, and density functional results. We found that the calculated PV EOS of Au (Figure 1) up to 1000 GPa is fully consistent with the former data of available experiments and theoretical results. From the high pressure point of view, with the increasing of pressure, all the elastic constants (Figures 2 and 3) and other elastic parameters (Figures 4 and 5) increased almost linearly. This finding is also compatible with the foregoing studies (Tables 1 and 2) of the considered metal. Finally, as it is obvious from all figures and tables, EAM based geometry optimization provides satisfactory results for the concerned study parameters and a convenient alternative for atomistic modeling.
References
 H. Kimikuza, S. Ogata, J. Li, and Y. Shibutani, “Complete set of elastic constants of αquartz at high pressure: a first principles study,” Physical Review B, vol. 75, no. 5, Article ID 054109, 6 pages, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Matsui, “High temperature and high pressure equation of state of gold,” Journal of Physics, vol. 215, no. 1, Article ID 012197, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S.H. Shim, T. S. Duffy, and K. Takemura, “Equation of state of gold and its application to the phase boundaries near 660 km depth in Earth's mantle,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 729–739, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. V. Pandya, P. R. Vyas, T. C. Pandya, N. Rani, and V. B. Gohel, “An improved lattice mechanical model for FCC transition metals,” Physica B, vol. 307, no. 1–4, pp. 138–149, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Ö. Çiftci, K. Çolakoğlu, S. Kazanç, and S. Özgen, “The effect of pressure on the elastic constants of Cu, Ag and Au: a molecular dynamics study,” Central European Journal of Physics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 472–480, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 P. I. Dorogokupets and A. R. Oganov, “Ruby, metals, and MgO as alternative pressure scales: a semiempirical description of shockwave, ultrasonic, xray, and thermochemical data at high temperatures and pressures,” Physical Review B, vol. 75, no. 2, Article ID 024115, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. D. Gale, “Molecular modeling theory: applications,” in The Geosciences, C. R. Timothy and J. D. Kubicki, Eds., chapter 2, p. 37, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Budi, D. J. Henry, J. D. Gale, and I. Yarovsky, “Comparison of embedded atom method potentials for small aluminium cluster simulations,” Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 21, no. 14, Article ID 144206, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. B. Wilson and D. M. Riffe, “An embeddedatommethod model for alkalimetal vibrations,” Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter, vol. 24, no. 33, Article ID 335401, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. Tschopp, K. N. Solanki, M. I. Baskes, F. Gao, X. Sun, and M. F. Horstemeyer, “Generalized framework for interatomic potential design: application to FeHe system,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 425, no. 1–3, pp. 22–32, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. J. Zhang and C. L. Chen, “Phonon dispersion in the Fcc metals Ca, Sr and Yb,” Journal of Low Temperature Physics, vol. 169, pp. 40–50, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 M. S. Daw and M. I. Baskes, “Semiempirical, quantum mechanical calculation of hydrogen embrittlement in metals,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 50, no. 17, pp. 1285–1288, 1983. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. W. Finnis and J. E. Sinclair, “A simple empirical Nbody potential for transition metals,” Philosophical Magazine A, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Güler and M. Güler, “A benchmark for some bulk properties of bcc iron,” The International Journal of Multiphysics, vol. 7, pp. 95–100, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 A. P. Sutton and J. Chen, “Longrange FinnisSinclair potentials,” Philosophical Magazine Letters, vol. 61, pp. 139–146, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
 J. D. Gale, “GULP: a computer program for the symmetryadapted simulation of solids,” Journal of the Chemical Society, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 629–637, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 J. D. Gale and A. L. Rohl, “The General Utility Lattice Program (GULP),” Molecular Simulation, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 291–341, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. B. Huntington, The Elastic Constants of the Crystals, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1958.
 E. A. Brandes and G. B. Brook, Smithells Metals Reference Book, ButterworthHeinemann, Oxford, UK, 7th edition, 1992.
 T. M. Flynn, Cryogenic Engineering, CRC Press, 2nd edition, 2004.
 M. B. Taylor, G. D. Barrera, N. L. Allan, and T. H. K. Barron, “Freeenergy derivatives and structure optimization within quasiharmonic lattice dynamics,” Physical Review B, vol. 56, no. 22, pp. 14380–14390, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 C. G. Broyden, “The convergence of a class of doublerank minimization algorithms 1. General considerations,” IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 76–90, 1970. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. R. Fletcher, “New approach to variable metric algorithms,” Computer Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 317–322, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Goldfarb, “A family of variable metric updates derived by variational means,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 24, pp. 23–26, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
 D. F. Shanno, “Conditioning of quasiNewton methods for function minimization,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 24, pp. 647–656, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Güler and E. Güler, “Embedded atom method based geometry optimization aspects of body centered cubic metals,” Chinese Physics Letter, vol. 30, no. 5, Article ID 056201, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Yokoo, N. Kawai, K. G. Nakamura, K.I. Kondo, Y. Tange, and T. Tsuchiya, “Ultrahighpressure scales for gold and platinum at pressures up to 550 GPa,” Physical Review B, vol. 80, no. 10, Article ID 104114, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. S. Duffy, G. Shen, D. L. Heinz et al., “Lattice strains in gold and rhenium under nonhydrostatic compression to 37 GPa,” Physical Review B, vol. 60, no. 22, pp. 15063–15073, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 C. W. Greeff and M. J. Graf, “Lattice dynamics and the high pressure equation of state of Au,” Physical Review B, vol. 69, no. 5, Article ID 054107, 10 pages, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Wang and M. Li, “The elastic stability, bifurcation and ideal strength of gold under hydrostatic stress: an ab initio calculation,” Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 21, no. 45, Article ID 455401, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 E. Güler and M. Güler. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.