Effect of Cu Addition on the Electrochemical Corrosion Performance of Ni<sub>3</sub>Al in 1.0 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>

<div>Variation of <svg height="11.9316pt" id="M79" style="vertical-align:-3.2957pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 19.6775 11.9316" width="19.6775pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M244 607C244 633 228 655 200 655C166 655 146 618 146 594C146 564 166 546 191 546C221 546 244 574 244 607ZM222 91L209 114C184 94 148 66 133 66C127 66 124 73 130 96L201 370C213 416 211 448 191 448C162 448 88 407 29 352L42 328C73 354 104 371 114 371C120 371 119 365 115 345L53 92C32 5 45 -12 68 -12C103 -12 186 50 222 91Z" id="g113-106"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="273" vert-adv-y="273"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,3.484,3.132)"><path d="M396 114C349 71 317 59 274 59C216 59 123 104 123 241C123 342 180 400 246 400C283 400 317 386 348 359C355 352 361 348 366 348C378 348 401 371 402 394C402 405 398 413 385 424C369 437 337 451 294 451H293C254 451 193 434 141 394C73 342 39 277 39 198C39 90 114 -12 243 -12C303 -12 371 31 415 90L396 114Z" id="g58-97"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="432" vert-adv-y="432"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,7.415,3.132)"><path d="M262 451C169 451 38 375 38 210C38 98 121 -12 261 -12C360 -12 481 64 481 227C481 351 386 451 262 451ZM249 414C337 414 385 320 385 204C385 70 333 25 272 25C189 25 134 117 134 241C134 355 189 414 249 414Z" id="g58-109"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="519" vert-adv-y="519"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,12.028,3.132)"><path d="M185 344V453C137 433 92 421 41 413V386C100 378 104 375 104 310V106C104 41 97 35 33 30V0H268V30C190 35 185 41 185 107V283C206 340 240 371 267 371C282 371 296 364 310 351C316 344 325 343 336 348C357 357 369 378 369 399C369 424 345 451 310 451C262 451 219 397 187 344H185Z" id="g58-112"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="380" vert-adv-y="380"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,15.55,3.132)"><path d="M185 344V453C137 433 92 421 41 413V386C100 378 104 375 104 310V106C104 41 97 35 33 30V0H268V30C190 35 185 41 185 107V283C206 340 240 371 267 371C282 371 296 364 310 351C316 344 325 343 336 348C357 357 369 378 369 399C369 424 345 451 310 451C262 451 219 397 187 344H185Z" id="g58-112"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="380" vert-adv-y="380"></glyph.data></g></svg> values for the tested materials in a 1.0 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> solution as a function of exposure time.</div>

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

fig4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Effect of Cu Addition on the Electrochemical Corrosion Performance of Ni<sub>3</sub>Al in 1.0 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> 

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Effect of Cu Addition on the Electrochemical Corrosion Performance of Ni3Al in 1.0 M H2SO4

Figure 4

Effect of Cu Addition on the Electrochemical Corrosion Performance of Ni₃Al in 1.0 M H₂SO₄