Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 214585, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/214585
Review Article

Influence of Antioxidant-Enhanced Polymers in Bitumen Rheology and Bituminous Concrete Mixtures Mechanical Performance

1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249-0668, USA
2Fugro Roadware, Inc., 8613 Cross Park Drive, Austin, TX 78754, USA
3Department of Civil Engineering, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Kunsan, Chellabuk-do 573-701, Republic of Korea
4Department of Transportation Engineering, Myongji University, San 38-2, Namdong, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 449-728, Republic of Korea

Received 21 August 2015; Accepted 3 November 2015

Academic Editor: Jun Liu

Copyright © 2015 Samer Dessouky et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. X. Lu and U. Isacsson, “Effect of ageing on bitumen chemistry and rheology,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Mastrofini and M. Scarsella, “The application of rheology to the evaluation of bitumen ageing,” Fuel, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 1005–1015, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. Sengoz and G. Isikyakar, “Analysis of styrene-butadiene-styrene polymer modified bitumen using fluorescent microscopy and conventional test methods,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 424–432, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. D. Airey, “Rheological properties of styrene butadiene styrene polymer modified road bitumens,” Fuel, vol. 82, no. 14, pp. 1709–1719, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. V. Kök and H. Çolak, “Laboratory comparison of the crumb-rubber and SBS modified bitumen and hot mix asphalt,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 3204–3212, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S.-P. Wu, L. Pang, L.-T. Mo, Y.-C. Chen, and G.-J. Zhu, “Influence of aging on the evolution of structure, morphology and rheology of base and SBS modified bitumen,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1005–1010, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. X. Lu and U. Isacsson, “Modification of road bitumens with thermoplastic polymers,” Polymer Testing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Durrieu, F. Farcas, and V. Mouillet, “The influence of UV aging of a Styrene/Butadiene/Styrene modified bitumen: comparison between laboratory and on site aging,” Fuel, vol. 86, no. 10-11, pp. 1446–1451, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Li, L. Li, Y. Zhang, S. Zhao, L. Xie, and S. Yao, “The influence of UV aging of a Styrene/Butadiene/Styrene modified bitumen: comparison between laboratory and on site aging,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 754–761, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Plancher, E. L. Green, and J. C. Petersen, “Reduction of oxidative hardening of asphalts by treatment with hydrated lime—a mechanistic study,” Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, vol. 45, pp. 1–24, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. K. Apeagyei, “Laboratory evaluation of antioxidants for asphalt binders,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Ouyang, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “Improving the aging resistance of styrene-butadiene-styrene tri-block copolymer modified asphalt by addition of antioxidants,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 795–804, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. K. Apeagyei, W. Buttlar, and B. J. Dempsey, “Investigation of cracking behavior of antioxidant-modified asphalt mixtures,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, vol. 77, pp. 517–548, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Dessouky, C. Reyes, M. Ilias, D. Contreras, and A. T. Papagiannakis, “Effect of pre-heating duration and temperature conditioning on the rheological properties of bitumen,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2785–2792, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Dessouky, D. Contreras, J. Sanchez, A. T. Papagiannakis, and A. Abbas, “Influence of hindered phenol additives on the rheology of aged polymer-modified bitumen,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 38, pp. 214–223, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. AASHTO T 315, “Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR),” Washington, DC, USA.
  17. S.-P. Wu, L. Pang, L.-T. Mo, Y.-C. Chen, and G.-J. Zhu, “Influence of aging on the evolution of structure, morphology and rheology of base and SBS modified bitumen,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1005–1010, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. M. S. Cortizo, D. O. Larsen, H. Bianchetto, and J. L. Alessandrini, “Effect of the thermal degradation of SBS copolymers during the ageing of modified asphalts,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 275–282, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. AASHTO, “Determining dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt (HMA),” AASHTO TP 62-07, AASHTO, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  20. D. W. Christensen, T. Pellinen, and R. F. Bonaquist, “Hirsch model for estimating the modulus of asphalt concrete,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, vol. 72, pp. 97–121, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  21. I. L. Al-Qadi, M. Elseifi, P. Yoo et al., “Accuracy of current complex modulus selection procedure from vehicular load pulse in NCHRP 1-37A mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide,” Transportation Research Board, vol. 2087, pp. 81–90, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  22. AASHTO T 283, Resistance of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) to Moisture-Induced Damage, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  23. AASHTO T 324, Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
  24. T. Aschenbrener and G. Currier, “Influence of testing variables on the results from the Hamburg wheel tracking device,” Tech. Rep. CDOT-DTD-R-93-22, Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, Colo, USA, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. N. Dongré, J. A. D'Angelo, and A. Copeland, “Refinement of flow number as determined by asphalt mixture performance tester: use in routine control-quality assurance practice,” Bituminous Materials and Mixtures, vol. 2, pp. 127–136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. AASHTO, “Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT),” AASHTO TP 79-09, AASHTO, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  27. AASHTO, “Determining the fatigue life of compacted hot mix asphalt subjected to repeated flexural bending,” AASHTO T 321, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar