Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 1950196, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1950196
Research Article

Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure, Phase Distribution, and Mechanical Properties of AlCoCuFeMnNi High Entropy Alloy

Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Muğla Sitki Kocman University, 48100 Muğla, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to Gulhan Cakmak; moc.liamg@kmkcnhlg

Received 16 May 2017; Accepted 13 July 2017; Published 27 August 2017

Academic Editor: Patrice Berthod

Copyright © 2017 Gulhan Cakmak. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The present paper reports the synthesis of AlCoCuFeMnNi high entropy alloy (HEA) with arc melting process. The as-cast alloy was heat treated at 900°C for 8 hours to investigate the effect of heat treatment on the structure and properties. Microstructural and mechanical properties of the alloy were analyzed together with the detailed phase analysis of the samples. The initially as-cast sample was composed of two separate phases with BCC and FCC structures having lattice parameters of 2.901 Å and 3.651 Å, respectively. The heat-treated alloy displays microsized rod-shaped precipitates both in the matrix and within the second phase. Rietveld refinement has shown that the structure was having three phases with lattice parameters of 2.901 Å (BCC), 3.605 Å (FCC1), and 3.667 Å (FCC2). The resulting phases and distribution of phases were also confirmed with the TEM methods. The alloys were characterized mechanically with the compression and hardness tests. The yield strength, compressive strength, and Vickers hardness of the as-cast alloy are 1317 ± 34 MPa, 1833 ± 45 MPa, and 448 ± 25 Hv, respectively. Heat treatment decreases the hardness values to 419 ± 26 Hv. The maximum compressive stress of the alloy increased to 2123 + 41 MPa while yield strength decreased to 1095 ± 45 with the treatment.

1. Introduction

Traditional alloy design approach is based on mixing of one or two primary elements with known properties and minor elements are added in order to improve their properties. According to conventional strategy for developing new alloy systems, multiprincipal elements can lead to the formation of intermetallic compounds and complex microstructures. Yeh et al. [1] and Cantor [2] have broken this thinking pattern with the development of high entropy alloys (HEA). High entropy alloys are the systems with usually more than five principle elements at levels of 5–35 at % [35]. Due to high configurational entropy of these systems, FCC and BCC solid solutions were generally formed rather than intermetallics and complex phases [68]. It has been shown that some alloy systems designed with HEA approach show excellent mechanical [810] and high-temperature properties [6] and wear [11] and high-temperature softening resistance [12] and so forth and they are suitable for many applications. In many cases the best balance of properties may be achieved for a multiprincipal element alloy consisting of more than one solid solution phase [8, 13].

Within the high entropy alloy systems, AlCoCrFeNi alloy is the one which has extensively been studied [14, 15]. It is well established that the properties of the alloy system depend on the composition. In the current study, we modified this alloy system by replacing Cr with Cu and Mn was added as new alloying element. The system was synthesized with arc melting method and characterized with respect to crystal structure, phase stability, microstructure, and mechanical properties. The sample was heat treated at 900°C for 8 hours to see high-temperature properties. The resultant microstructures and phases were analyzed before and after heat treatment with the method of X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, compression test, and microhardness test.

2. Experimental Method

Equiatomic amount of high purity Al (99.9%), Co (99.9%), Cu (99.9%), Fe (99.9%), Ni (99.9%), and Mn (99.9%) was melted in an arc furnace under argon atmosphere. Approximately batches of 3 grams were melted in a water-cooled copper mold. The ingot was remelted three times in order to increase homogeneity. The specimen was evaluated at as-cast condition and heat treated at 900°C in an argon atmosphere for 8 hours and furnace cooled.

The phases are characterized with X-ray diffraction method using a Bruker D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer (XRD) with copper target operated at 40 kv 30 mA. The lattice parameters and crystal structures as well as volume fractions were obtained from the Rietveld refinement of X-ray data with MAUD program [16]. Compositional and microstructural analysis were carried out using FEI Nova NanoSEM 430 equipped with EDS detector.

Thin-foil specimens were prepared by mechanical thinning followed by ion milling and were observed under a transmission electron microscope (200 kV TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Mechanical properties were evaluated by uniaxial compression tests on samples with 3 mm diameter and 4.5 mm length by using an Instron 5582 testing system with a strain rate of 10−3 s−1. Three compression tests were performed to obtain average value. The hardness values were measured using 4.903 N load for 10 sec. The reported hardness value was an average of at least 10 measurements.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phase Analysis

Figure 1(a) shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the as-cast sample with the aforementioned composition. Detailed Rietveld refinement of the XRD data shows that as-cast sample is composed of two solid solution phases with body centered cubic (BCC) and face centered cubic (FCC) crystal structure. The lattice parameters of the BCC solid solution and FCC solid solutions are found to be 2.901 Å and 3.651 Å, respectively. The relative fractions of these two phases are 65.66% (BCC) and 34.34% (FCC).

Figure 1: X-ray diffractograms for AlCoCuFeMnNi (a) before heat treatment and (b) after heat treatment.

The alloy was heat treated at 900°C for 8 hours. After heat treatment, a second FCC phase with similar lattice parameter appeared on XRD data with BCC phase seen in as-cast sample remaining in the structure (Figure 1(b)). The lattice parameters of the two FCC phases are calculated to be 3.667 Å and 3.605 Å, while the lattice constant of BCC phase is determined to be 2.893 Å. The relative fractions of these phases are found to be 26.82%, 19.53%, and 53.65, respectively. The corresponding phases, their lattice parameters, and volume fractions of these two conditions have been listed in Table 1. Rietveld refined X-ray diffractogram of the heat-treated sample is given in Figure 2. It should be noted here that we see the transformation of some fraction of BCC and FCC phases to another FCC phase which we will call FCC-2 from now on.

Table 1: Rietveld Refinement results of the as-cast and heat-treated sample.
Figure 2: Rietveld refined X-ray diffractogram of heat-treated sample.
3.2. Microstructure and Chemical Composition Analysis

Figure 3(a) presents the backscattered electron image of the as-cast alloy. It is seen from the image that the microstructure contains a main phase exhibiting relatively darker contrast and another phase with brighter contrast, which is consistent with XRD results. The overall atomic composition which is obtained from energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of the as-cast sample and point analysis of the darker and brighter phases is given in Table 2. It can be seen that the darker phase is enriched with Al while brighter regions are enriched with Fe and Cu.

Table 2: Chemical composition of the as-cast and heat-treated alloys.
Figure 3: Backscattered SEM images of the (a) as-cast and (b) heat-treated sample. (c) A closer look to the heat-treated sample.

Heat treatment of the sample leads to the formation of more complex microstructure, which is supported by X-ray diffraction analysis, Figure 3(b). A closer look to the microstructure reveals that rod-shaped precipitates are visible within both darker and brighter areas (refer to Figure 3(c)).

As it can be seen from the SEM image there seems to be four regions. These regions can be named as (1) the dark matrix phase (MP) and (2) bright precipitates within matrix phase (PM) and (3) bright secondary phase (SP) and (4) dark precipitates within secondary phase (PS). To understand the nature of these regions, point elemental analyses are applied to each region and these values are also included in Table 2. Although the resulting quantitative values have restricted accuracy due to small sizes of phases, the values can give rough information related to compositional distribution among four regions. The values in Table 2 show that composition of the matrix phase (MP) is found to be rich in Al while bright secondary phase (SP) is rich in Cu.

In order to verify the compositional variation within the microstructure, the elemental mapping was carried out and the colored maps are given in Figure 4. It is seen that the matrix phase has more Al, Co, and Ni than the secondary phase which is rich in Cu. The needle-like precipitates within the matrix are enriched with Cu.

Figure 4: Elemental mapping of the heat-treated high entropy alloy.
3.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis

The obtained phase distribution has further been verified with TEM analysis. The similar microstructure obtained from SEM analysis is observed in TEM. Bright field TEM image for the heat-treated sample is shown in Figure 5(a). The upper inset (b) shows diffraction pattern from matrix region (MP) and is found to have BCC structure with BCC zone axis. Similarly lower inset (c) has been obtained from the precipitate in matrix (PM) and has FCC structure from FCC zone axis. Crystal structure of the second phase is also determined using selected area diffraction pattern. The diffraction patterns are obtained from the bright field image shown in Figure 5(d) and the patterns are indexed for the second-phase particle (upper inset, (e)) and for the precipitate in second phase (lower inset, (f)). The structures have been found to be FCC from FCC zone axis and BCC from BCC zone axis, respectively. To summarize TEM images and diffraction patterns, it can be said that the matrix phase (MP) and dark precipitates within secondary phase (PS) are found to be BCC with the same lattice parameter while secondary phase (SP) and bright precipitates within matrix phase (PM) are found to be FCC phases with two different but close lattice parameters.

Figure 5: TEM image and corresponding SAED patterns of bulk AlCoCuFeMnNi HEA after heat treatment. (a) Bright field image showing the primary and secondary phases. (b) SAED pattern of the matrix from zone axis; (c) SAED pattern of FCC needle-like precipitates from zone axis; (d) bright field image showing the second phase and needle-like precipitates within; (e) SAED pattern of the second phase particle from FCC zone axis; (f) SAED pattern of the needle-like precipitates within secondary phase from zone axis.
3.4. Mechanical Analysis

Figure 6 shows the engineering stress-strain curve of heat treated AlCoCuFeMnNi HEA under compression at room temperature. The yield strength () and compressive strength () values of AlCoCuFeMnNi HEA are 1095 ± 45 MPa and 2123 ± 41 MPa, respectively. The values before heat treatment were also shown in Figure 6 and measured to be 1317 ± 34 and 1833 ± 45 MPa, respectively. Increase in compression strength of the material can be related to the small sized precipitates within the heat-treated sample [17].

Figure 6: Engineering stress-strain curve of bulk AlCoCuFeMnNi HEA under compression.

The microhardness value of the AlCoCuFeMnNi alloy was 448 ± 25 Hv while with heat treatment it was measured to be 419 ± 26 Hv. A decrease was observed in the microhardness values with heat treatment since there is a decrease in the volume fraction of BCC phase, which exhibits higher hardness/strength than that of the FCC phases, consistent with what has been previously reported [1719].

4. Conclusion

In the current study, we investigate the effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and phase distribution and on the mechanical properties of the alloy. We observe that two phase structures which were initially FCC and BCC structure were converted into three phase structures with one BCC and two FCC structures with heat treatment. The SEM micrographs show that the phases of HEA exhibit rod-shaped precipitates within both the matrix and second phase. TEM analyses verify that these three phases were distributed as the FCC precipitates (PM) in BCC matrix (MP) and as BCC precipitates (PS) in FCC second phase (SP). These two FCC phases have close lattice parameters as 3.605 Å and 3.667 Å. This change in microstructure and phase constitution was accompanied by a corresponding progressive decrease in microhardness with decreasing BCC content, clearly indicating that the BCC microstructure is substantially harder than the FCC microstructure. The corresponding increase on mechanical strength value was thought to be related to small sized precipitates within the structure.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. J.-W. Yeh, S.-K. Chen, S.-J. Lin et al., “Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: novel alloy design concepts and outcomes,” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 299–303, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. B. Cantor, “Multicomponent and high entropy alloys,” Entropy, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 4749–4768, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. X. F. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Qiao, and G. L. Chen, “Novel microstructure and properties of multicomponent CoCrCuFeNiTix alloys,” Intermetallics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 357–362, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J.-W. Yeh, S.-J. Lin, T.-S. Chin et al., “Formation of simple crystal structures in Cu-Co-Ni-Cr-Al-Fe-Ti-V alloys with multiprincipal metallic elements,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 2533–2536, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. C.-W. Tsai, M.-H. Tsai, J.-W. Yeh, and C.-C. Yang, “Effect of temperature on mechanical properties of Al0.5CoCrCuFeNi wrought alloy,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 490, no. 1-2, pp. 160–165, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Varalakshmi, M. Kamaraj, and B. S. Murty, “Processing and properties of nanocrystalline CuNiCoZnAlTi high entropy alloys by mechanical alloying,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 527, no. 4-5, pp. 1027–1030, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C.-J. Tong, M.-R. Chen, J.-W. Yeh et al., “Mechanical performance of the AlxCoCrCuFeNi high-entropy alloy system with multiprincipal elements,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1263–1271, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. J. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Y. L. Wang, and G. L. Chen, “Solid solution alloys of AlCoCrFeNiTix with excellent room-temperature mechanical properties,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, no. 18, p. 181904, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. W.-R. Wang, W.-L. Wang, S.-C. Wang, Y.-C. Tsai, C.-H. Lai, and J.-W. Yeh, “Effects of Al addition on the microstructure and mechanical property of Al xCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys,” Intermetallics, vol. 26, pp. 44–51, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. X. Ye, M. Ma, W. Liu et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of High-Entropy Alloy AlxFeCoNiCuCr by Laser Cladding,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2011, Article ID 485942, 7 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. P.-K. Hung, J.-W. Yeh, T.-T. Shun, and S.-K. Chen, “Multi-principal-element alloys with improved oxidation and wear resistance for thermal spray coating,” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 6, no. 1-2, pp. 74–78, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. C.-Y. Hsu, C.-C. Juan, W.-R. Wang, T.-S. Sheu, J.-W. Yeh, and S.-K. Chen, “On the superior hot hardness and softening resistance of AlCoCrxFeMo0.5Ni high-entropy alloys,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 528, no. 10-11, pp. 3581–3588, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. B. Miracle, J. D. Miller, O. N. Senkov, C. Woodward, M. D. Uchic, and J. Tiley, “Exploration and development of high entropy alloys for structural applications,” Entropy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 494–525, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H.-P. Chou, Y.-S. Chang, S.-K. Chen, and J.-W. Yeh, “Microstructure, thermophysical and electrical properties in AlxCoCrFeNi (0≤x≤2) high-entropy alloys,” Materials Science and Engineering: B, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 184–189, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. Y. P. Wang, B. S. Li, M. X. Ren, C. Yang, and H. Z. Fu, “Microstructure and compressive properties of AlCrFeCoNi high entropy alloy,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 491, no. 1-2, pp. 154–158, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. L. Lutterotti, S. Matthies, and H. R. Wenk, Int Union Crystallogr Comm Powder Diffr Newslett 1999, 21, p. 14 MAUD Version 2.072, 2008 http://maud.radiographema.eu/.
  17. T. Borkar, B. Gwalani, D. Choudhuri et al., “A combinatorial assessment of AlxCrCuFeNi2 (0 < x < 1.5) complex concentrated alloys: Microstructure, microhardness, and magnetic properties,” Acta Materialia, vol. 116, pp. 63–76, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J.-M. Wua, S.-J. Lin, J.-W. Yeh, S.-K. Chen, Y.-S. Huang, and H.-C. Chen, “Adhesive wear behavior of AlxCoCrCuFeNi high-entropy alloys as a function of aluminum content,” Wear, vol. 261, no. 5-6, pp. 513–519, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M.-H. Tsai and J.-W. Yeh, “High-entropy alloys: a critical review,” Materials Research Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 107–123, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar