Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 5821835, 9 pages
Research Article

Comparison of Damage Detection Methods Depending on FRFs within Specified Frequency Ranges

1Department of Architectural Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Department of Architectural Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Hee-Chang Eun;

Received 8 April 2017; Accepted 20 July 2017; Published 29 August 2017

Academic Editor: Xiao-Jian Gao

Copyright © 2017 Yong-Su Kim and Hee-Chang Eun. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Structural damage can be detected using frequency response function (FRF) measured by an impact and the corresponding responses. The change in the mechanical properties of dynamic system for damage detection can seldom be estimated using FRF data extracted from a very limited frequency range. Proper orthogonal modes (POMs) from the FRFs extracted in given frequency ranges and their modified forms can be utilized as damage indices to detect damage. The POM-based damage detection methods must be sensitive to the selected FRFs. This work compares the effectiveness of the damage detection approaches taking the POMs estimated by the FRFs within five different frequency ranges including resonance frequency and antiresonance frequency. It is shown from a numerical example that the POMs extracted from the FRFs within antiresonance frequency ranges provide more explicit information on the damage locations than the ones within resonance frequency ranges.