Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 6310321, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6310321
Research Article

Impact of Plastic Hinge Properties on Capacity Curve of Reinforced Concrete Bridges

1Civil Engineering Department, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
3The Hashemite University of Jordan, Zarqa, Jordan

Correspondence should be addressed to Nasim Shatarat; oj.ude.uj@taratahs.n

Received 15 February 2017; Revised 16 May 2017; Accepted 6 June 2017; Published 16 August 2017

Academic Editor: Jun Liu

Copyright © 2017 Nasim Shatarat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. J. N. Priestley, F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi, Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, John Wiley Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
  2. N. K. Shattarat, M. D. Symans, D. I. McLean, and W. F. Cofer, “Evaluation of nonlinear static analysis methods and software tools for seismic analysis of highway bridges,” Engineering Structures, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1335–1345, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Panandikar Hede and K. S. B. Narayan, “Sensitivity of pushover curve to material and geometric modelling—an analytical investigation,” Structures, vol. 2, pp. 91–97, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Pinho, C. Casarotti, and S. Antoniou, “A comparison of single-run pushover analysis techniques for seismic assessment of bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1347–1362, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Pinho, R. Monteiro, C. Casarotti, and R. Delgado, “Assessment of continuous span bridges through nonlinear static procedures,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 143–159, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Isaković, M. P. Nino Lazaro, and M. Fischinger, “Applicability of pushover methods for the seismic analysis of single-column bent viaducts,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1185–1202, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. S. Paraskeva, A. J. Kappos, and A. G. Sextos, “Extension of modal pushover analysis to seismic assessment of bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1269–1293, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Antoniou and R. Pinho, “Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 497–522, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. S. Elnashai, “Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51–69, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Naeim, Ten Commandments on Pushover Analysis, John A. Martin and Associates, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 1999.
  11. A. K. Chopra and R. K. Goel, A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure to estimate Seismic Demands for Buildings: Theory and Preliminary Evaluation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering University of Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Mao, C. Zhai, and L. Xie, “An improved modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Krawinkler and G. D. P. K. Seneviratna, “Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation,” Engineering Structures, vol. 20, no. 4-6, pp. 452–464, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. FEMA, “NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings,” Report FEMA-273 (Guidelines) and Report FEMA-274 (Commentary), Washington, DC, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  15. ATC, “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings,” Tech. Rep. ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood, Calif, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  16. FEMA, “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings,” Tech. Rep. FEMA 356, American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  17. CEN, “Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings,” Tech. Rep. EN1998-1, European Committee for Standardization, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  18. FEMA, “Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures,” Applied Technology Council (ATC-55 Project) FEMA 440, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  19. ASCE, “Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings,” Tech. Rep. ASCE/SEI 7- 05, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Inel and H. B. Ozmen, “Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings,” Engineering Structures, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1494–1502, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. H. M. M. Billah and M. Shahria Alam, “Plastic hinge length of shape memory alloy (SMA) reinforced concrete bridge pier,” Engineering Structures, vol. 117, pp. 321–331, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. C. Shrestha, M. S. Saiidi, and C. A. Cruz, “Advanced materials for control of post-earthquake damage in bridges,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 24, no. 2, Article ID 025035, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. H. M. Muntasir Billah and M. Shahria Alam, “Performance-based seismic design of shape memory alloy-reinforced concrete bridge piers. I: development of performance-based damage states,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 142, no. 12, Article ID 4016140, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. CALTRANS, “Caltrans seismic design criteria,” Tech. Rep. Version 1.6, California Department of Transportation, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. CSI, “SAP2000: integrated software for structural analysis and design,” Tech. Rep. Version 18.2, Computers and Structures, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  26. FHWA, “Seismic retrofitting manual for highway structures: part 1-bridges,” Publication No FHWA-HRT-06-032, Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. N. Shatarat, “Effect of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of highway bridges,” Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 501–510, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  28. PTC MathCAD, “Engineering math software,” Tech. Rep. Version 15, PTC, Needham, Mass, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  29. AASHTO, Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, DC, USA, 2nd edition, 2011, with 2012, 2014, and 2015 Interim Revisions.
  30. J. B. Mander, M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park, “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1804–1826, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Lpile, A Program for the Analysis of Piles and Drilled Shafts under Later Load, Version 2014, Ensoft, Austin, Tex, USA, 2014.