Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 2314794 | 5 pages |

One-Step Synthesis of Conductive BNC/PPy·CuCl2 Hybrid Flexible Nanocomposites by In Situ Polymerization

Academic Editor: Zhiping Luo
Received30 May 2018
Revised23 Aug 2018
Accepted29 Aug 2018
Published23 Sep 2018


This work reports the one-step synthesis of bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) incorporated with polypyrrole (PPy) by chemical in situ polymerization of pyrrole (Py) using CuCl2·2H2O as both oxidant agent and functional component, varying the concentration and molar ratio. Electrical, morphological, and physical-chemical properties of these nanocomposites were investigated. The results revealed that with the increase of Py concentration and molar ratio, the nanocomposites presented traces of copper chloride and copper oxide as shown by Raman and XRD analysis. The quality of bacterial cellulose nanofibers coating by the polymer and the electrical conductivity of the nanocomposites was directly affected by those variables. The combination of the conducting polymer with the oxidant agent offers possibilities for different applications such as electronic devices and sensors.

1. Introduction

Conducting polymers can be employed as active, functional components in flexible nanocomposites [13]. The interest in research on polymeric and hybrid nanocomposites containing both conductive polymers and oxide materials has attracted the attention of many research groups in recent years [1, 2]. Such class of nanocomposites shows great potential in various applications like sensors and other electronic devices, as they combine electrical, optical, and magnetic properties in one material [46].

Among the substrates for flexible electronics, bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) has been extensively applied in the synthesis of polymeric and hybrid nanocomposites mainly due to its low-cost and controllable synthesis process [7, 8]. Several studies have been performed in the polymerization of conductive polymers onto bacterial nanocellulose membranes for various applications such as sensors [9], electronic devices, and biomedical devices [10, 11].

The oxidative chemical polymerization in aqueous media of conducting polymers, such as polypyrrole and polyaniline, is widely used as a preparation method, because of the simplicity of the reaction [12, 13]. The electrical conductivity and other properties of these polymers depend on the preparation conditions. Fe (III) salts and ammonium persulfate are the most common oxidants used for polymerization of conductive polymers. Because of their potential of oxidation, other oxidants have been reported in the literature, such as sulfate of cerium IV [14], potassium dichromate [15], vanadium chloride [16], and copper (II) salts [17]. It is known that the use of different oxidizing agents tends to alter the electrical and morphological properties of conducting polymers [18]. However, studies on the use of different oxidants and their functionality in such composites are scarce, since they are usually removed, leaving only the compositional polymers.

This work reports the synthesis and characterization of flexible BNC/PPy·CuCl2 nanocomposites in a single step through in situ oxidative polymerization with copper chloride dehydrate as both oxidant agent and conducting component in the nanocomposites. Structural and electrical properties were evaluated and related to the monomer concentration and the oxidant agent : monomer molar ratio.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Copper chloride dehydrate (CuCl2·2(H2O)) and Pyrrole (Py) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Bacterial cellulose membranes were synthesized in static culture medium according to the procedure described by Rambo et al. [19] using Gluconacetobacter hansenii, 558 232 ATC strain.

2.2. BNC/PPy Composite Preparation

BNC/PPy·CuCl2 nanocomposites were prepared through in situ oxidative polymerization of Py using the copper chloride dehydrate as the oxidant agent. The hydrated BNC membranes with diameters of 30 mm were immersed in an alcoholic solution (isopropyl alcohol) with two different Py concentrations, 0.04 and 0.08 mol·L−1. After 10 min under magnetic stirring, a copper chloride dehydrate alcoholic solution was added gently. The polymerization was carried out at 25°C during 4 h. After polymerization, the BNC/PPy·CuCl2 membranes were washed thoroughly with acetone in order to extract the residues and byproducts of the reaction. The membranes were then vacuum dried at room temperature. The CuCl2·2(H2O) : Py molar ratios used for the chemical synthesis were 2 : 1 and 4 : 1.

2.3. Characterization of BNC/PPy·CuCl2 Composite Membranes

X-ray diffractometry was used for phase identification (XRD; Phillis, X-Pert) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å). BNC/PPy·CuCl2 membranes were placed on aluminum stubs and scanned over a 2θ interval between 5° and 70° with a step of 1°/min. Raman spectroscopy (InnoRam, B and WTEK) was also performed for structural analysis. The microstructure of the samples was evaluated by Field-Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscopy (FEG-SEM, JEOL JSM-670F) operating at 15 kV and 80 A. For SEM observations, pure BNC and the BNC nanocomposites membranes were dried and placed on an aluminum support and sputtered with gold. Electrical conductivity of the BNC/PPY·CuCl2 membranes was measured in ambient conditions using the four-probe method by a high precision SMU (Agilent B2912A). At least three samples of each composition were measured.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical and Structural Analysis

The changes in the chemical structure of polypyrrole in the presence of the oxidizing agent CuCl2·2(H2O) as well as the oxidant agent : monomer molar ratio effect on the nanocomposites properties were studied. BNC/PPy·CuCl2 composites were initially analyzed using chemical and structural analysis.

Figure 1 shows Raman spectra of BNC/PPy·CuCl2 composites prepared with different Py concentrations and different oxidant agent : monomer molar ratios. Two typical peaks of polypyrrole can be observed in all samples. The typical bands of PPy are observed in the region of 1560 cm−1 and 1380 cm−1 due to the ring stretching mode and the C=C stretching of the main chain [20]. A peak is observed in the nearby region of 329 cm−1, characteristic of CuO and CuCl2 [21]. It can be noticed that for the composite with higher Py concentration and higher molar ratio this peak is more evident.

Figure 2 shows FTIR spectra of the bacterial cellulose nanocomposites polymerized with pyrrole using copper chloride as the oxidizing agent with different molar ratios and Py concentrations. All spectra display typical characteristics of conductive polymer as widely reported in the literature, in addition to the characteristic bands of pure CuCl2 and BNC. In the CuCl2 spectrum, the peaks centered at 3340 cm−1 and 1575 cm−1 correspond to the OH stretching, and the peak characteristic of Cu–Cl is located at 1129 cm−1 [22]. In the BNC spectrum, the 3325 cm−1 band is characteristic of O–H groups and the peak at 2922 cm−1 to asymmetric C–H bonds. The 1649 and 1028 cm−1 bands can be attributed to C–O and C–O–C type bonds [23]. In all other spectra, the bands observed between 1550 cm−1 and 1460 cm−1 are assigned to C–C bonds and C–N stretching vibration of the pyrrole ring, respectively. It is also observed a peak in the 1613 cm−1 region, corresponding to Cu+ ion [24]. The region near the band at 1050 cm−1 corresponds to C–H and C–N deformation vibration. Three bands centered at around 920, 1100, and 1195 cm−1 correspond to the stretching vibration to the doped PPy. A band located at 1700 cm−1 is attributed to the carboxylic group. As can be seen, this band has been observed in many samples of polypyrrole both chemically and electrochemically polymerized. This band corresponds to the overoxidation of the C=O band of pyrrole, which influences its conductivity [2527].

Figure 3 shows X-ray diffraction spectra of pure bacterial nanocellulose and BNC/PPy·CuCl2 nanocomposites polymerized with different Py concentrations and molar ratios. For the BNC spectrum, three main diffraction peaks at 15°, 16.5°, and 22.7°, characteristic of cellulose type I, can be observed, which are attributed to the reflection planes (110), (110), and (200), respectively [28]. For the BNC/PPy·CuCl2 nanocomposite with a Py concentration of 0.04 mol·L−1 and 4 : 1 molar ratio, characteristic peaks of copper hydroxide are observed (JCPDS 00-042-0746). The presence of copper hydroxide peaks may be related to the interaction of the BNC hydroxyl groups with the oxidizing agent. With the increase of both the Py concentration from 0.04 to 0.08 mol.L−1 and the molar ratio from 2 : 1 to 4 : 1, the copper hydroxide peaks are absent; however, copper chloride and traces of copper oxide peaks can be seen (JCPDS 01-072-0572). For the 2 : 1 molar ratio, peaks corresponding to the oxidizing agent are not present, only an amorphous halo, which is a characteristic of polypyrrole and the broad peaks, which are related to the bacterial cellulose.

The CuCl2 present in the membranes is not chemically bound, but physically within the nanofibrous network. It is known that copper can assume valence 1 or 2, and considering that it is not chemically bound to the compound but in the form of CuCl2 salt, being a simple ionic compound. The Cu valence can assume the number of oxidation +2, bivalent. Another evidence to consider this valence is the instability of the Cu+ ions and also the low potential of Cu+2/Cu+ (0.57 V) compared to PPy (1.0 V). Because the potential is lower, receiving electrons by Cu+2 becomes more difficult, preventing its changing to Cu+ [29].

3.2. Morphologic and Electrical Characterization

Figure 4 shows the morphology of the BNC/PPy·CuCl2 nanocomposites polymerized with different Py concentrations and oxidizing agent : monomer molar ratios through field-emission scanning electron microscopy. BNC membranes are formed by a network structure of intertwined cellulose nanofibers with high aspect ratio [23, 30]. For the 2 : 1 molar ratio, it can be observed that at both concentrations (0.04 and 0 : 08 mol·L−1), the bacterial cellulose nanofibers are coated with PPy (Figure 4(a)). As the concentration of Py increases (Figure 4(b)), an increase on the amount of PPy incorporated into the BNC matrix is observed. The increase of the concentration of Py results in an increase of the concentration of PPy particles, forming agglomerates of PPy deposited on the surface of the BNC nanofibers (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). As the molar ratio increases from 2 : 1 to 4 : 1, an increase in the mean fiber diameter is observed, as can be also seen in Figures 4(c) and 4(d). BNC/PPy·CuCl2 nanocomposites exhibited an average fiber diameter close to 300 nm; this value is four times larger than that of pure cellulose nanofibers (50 nm in average). This significant increase was not observed for 2 : 1 ratio nanocomposites, in which it was observed an average fiber diameter of 70 nm.

The electrical conductivity of the nanocomposites as a function of concentration of pyrrole and the molar ratio used in the reactions are shown in Table 1.

[Py] CuCl2·2(H2O) : PyConductivity (S/cm)

[0.04] 2 : 11.64 × 10−4 ± 1.93 × 10−5
[0.08] 2 : 11.54 × 10−3 ± 9.10 × 10−3
[0.04] 4 : 11.85 × 10−2 ± 5.94 × 10−2
[0.08] 4 : 18.13 × 10−1 ± 4.32 × 10−3

Pure BNC exhibits low electric conductivity, around 3.0 × 10−13 S/cm. It can be seen for the 2 : 1 molar ratio membranes that the electrical conductivity increases with the increase of PPy concentration, from 1.64 × 10−4 to 1.54 × 10−3 S/cm. For higher molar ratios, it was observed a significant increase in electrical conductivity of the nanocomposites (1.85 × 10−2 to 8.13 × 10−1 S/cm), which is two orders of magnitude higher when compared to the membrane with the same concentration and different molar ratio [9, 31]. The increase in molar ratio influenced the increase in conductivity. For higher molar ratios, the amount of copper chloride also increased, which can be the reason for higher values of electrical conductivity.

4. Conclusions

Cellulose conducting nanocomposites incorporated with polypyrrole were synthesized in a single step by in situ chemical oxidative polymerization using CuCl2·2(H2O). The chemical and morphological characterization of the nanocomposites confirmed the presence of the conducting polymer deposited along the nanofibers and Cu-containing salts. The presence of Cu salts influenced the increase of the electrical conductivity of the nanocomposites. These nanocomposites can be promising materials in applications such as electronic devices and sensors.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study (tables and graphics) are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


The authors gratefully thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil) and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES, Brazil) for the financial support and scholarships (Grant no. 2591/2011). The authors also thank the Central Laboratory of Electronic Microscopy (LCME/UFSC).


  1. S. I. A. Razak, I. F. Wahab, F. Fadil, F. N. Dahli, A. Z. M. Khudzari, and H. Adeli, “A review of electrospun conductive polyaniline based nanofiber composites and blends: processing features, applications, and future directions,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 356286, p. 19, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Kasisomayajula, N. Jadhav, and V. J. Gelling, “In situ preparation and characterization of a conductive and magnetic nanocomposite of polypyrrole and copper hydroxychloride,” RSC Advances, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 967–977, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Q. Liu, B. Wang, J. Chen et al., “Facile synthesis of three-dimensional (3D) interconnecting polypyrrole (PPy) nanowires/nanofibrous textile composite electrode for high performance supercapacitors,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 101, pp. 30–40, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. Deng, Y. Peng, C. He, X. Long, P. Li, and A. S. Chan, “Magnetic and conducting Fe3O4-polypyrrole nanoparticles with core-shell structure,” Polymer International, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1182–1187, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. X. Zhanga, M. Heb, P. Hea et al., “Ultrafine nano-network structured bacterial cellulose as reductant and bridging ligands to fabricate ultrathin K-birnessite type MnO2 nanosheets for supercapacitors,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 433, pp. 419–427, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. A. A. M. Abdah, N. A. Zubair, N. H. N. Azman, and Y. Sulaiman, “Fabrication of PEDOT coated PVA-GO nanofiber for supercapacitor,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 192, pp. 161–169, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  7. W. Lei, L. Han, C. Xuan et al., “Nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers derived from polypyrrole coated bacterial cellulose as high-performance electrode materials for supercapacitors and Li-ion batteries,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 210, pp. 130–137, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Liu, J. Zhou, J. Tang, and W. Tang, “Three-dimensional, chemically bonded polypyrrole/bacterial cellulose/graphene composites for high-performance supercapacitors,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 27, no. 20, pp. 7034–7041, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. Muller, C. R. Rambo, L. M. Porto, W. H. Schreiner, and G. M. O. Barra, “Structure and properties of polypyrrole/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 655–662, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Laya, I. Gonzáleza, J. A. Tarrés, N. Pellicera, K. N. Bunb, and F. Vilaseca, “High electrical and electrochemical properties in bacterial cellulose/polypyrrole membranes,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 91, pp. 1–9, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Muller, J. P. Silva, C. R. Rambo, G. M. O. Barra, F. Dourado, and F. M. Gama, “Neuronal cells’ behavior on polypyrrole coated bacterial nanocellulose three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1368–1377, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Wei, Q. Hu, Y. Cao et al., “Polypyrrole nanotube arrays on carbonized cotton textile for aqueous sodium battery,” Organic Electronics, vol. 46, pp. 211–217, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. X. Li, Y. Wu, K. Hua et al., “Vertically aligned polyaniline nanowire arrays for lithium-ion battery,” Colloid and Polymer Science, vol. 296, no. 8, pp. 1395–1400, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Omastováa, K. Mosnáčková, M. Trchová et al., “Polypyrrole and polyaniline prepared with cerium(IV) sulfate oxidant,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 160, no. 7-8, pp. 701–707, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. M. Ayad and M. A. Shenashin, “Polyaniline film deposition from the oxidative polymerization of aniline using K2Cr2O7,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 197–202, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. Li, L. Jiang, and H. Peng, “One-dimensional polyaniline nanostructures with controllable surfaces and diameters using vanadic acid as the oxidant,” Macromolecules, vol. 40, no. 22, pp. 7890–7894, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Hur, K. Im, S. W. Kim et al., “Polypyrrole/agarose-based electronically conductive and reversibly restorable hydrogel,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 10066–10076, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. Lv, X. Wang, and H. Zou, “Chemical synthesis and characterization of conducting poly(2-Aminothiazole),” Materials Science Forum, vol. 867, pp. 111–115, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. R. Rambo, D. O. S. Recouvreux, C. A. Carminatti, A. K. Pitlovanciv, R. V. Antônio, and L. M. Porto, “Template assisted synthesis of porous nanofibrous cellulose membranes for tissue engineering,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 549–554, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. P. Lim, A. Pandikumar, Y. S. Lim, N. M. Huang, and H. N. Lim, “In-situ electrochemically deposited polypyrrole nanoparticles incorporated reduced graphene oxide as an efficient counter electrode for platinum-free dye-sensitized solar cells,” Scientific Reports-UK, vol. 4, no. 1, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. G. M. Da Silva, T. S. Rodrigues, A. L. A. Parussulo et al., “Controlled synthesis of nanomaterials at the undergraduate laboratory: Cu(OH)2 and CuO nanowires,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 743–750, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. G. Thakurata, A. Kalyan, R. Sen, and R. Bhattacharjee, “Vibrational IR active spectra of copper (II) chloride and cobalt (II) chloride: a combined experimental and theoretical lie algebraic study,” Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 776–780, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. Müller, C. R. Rambo, D. O. S. Recouvreux, L. M. Porto, and G. M. O. Barra, “Chemical in situ polymerization of polypyrrole on bacterial cellulose nanofibers,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 161, no. 1-2, pp. 106–111, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Mohammadi, I. Lundström, O. Inganiis, and W. R. Salaneck, “Conducting polymers prepared by template polymerization: polypyrrole,” Polymer, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 395–399, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. P. Gemeinera, J. Kulicek, M. Mikula et al., “Polypyrrole-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the simple preparation of counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 210, pp. 323–331, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. Van Zoelen, S. Bondzic, T. F. Landaluce et al., “Nanostructured polystyrene-block-poly(4-vinyl pyridine)(pentadecylphenol) thin films as templates for polypyrrole synthesis,” Polymer, vol. 50, no. 15, pp. 3617–3625, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Jaymand, “Poly(4-chloromethyl styrene-g-4-vinylpyridine)/TiO2 thin films as templates for the synthesis of polypyrrole in the nanometer-sized domain,” Designed Monomers and Polymers, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 433–444, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Tokoh, K. Takabe, M. Fujita, and H. Saiki, “Cellulose synthesized by acetobacter xylinum in the presence of acetyl glucomannan,” Cellulose, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 249–261, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. X. Li, Y. Gao, X. Zhang et al., “Polyaniline/CuCl nanocomposites prepared by UV rays irradiation,” Materials Letters, vol. 62, no. 15, pp. 2237–2240, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Wan, D. Hu, G. Xiong, D. Li, R. Guo, and H. Luo, “Directional fluid induced self-assembly of oriented bacterial cellulose nanofibers for potential biomimetic tissue engineering scaffolds,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 149-150, pp. 7–11, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Peng, L. Fan, W. Rao, Z. Bai, W. Xu, and J. Xu, “Bacterial cellulose membranes coated by polypyrrole/copper oxide as flexible supercapacitor electrodes,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1930–1942, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Daliana Müller et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

794 Views | 283 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.