Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 3254081, 8 pages
Research Article

Synthesis, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots and Iron Oxide Nanocomposites

1Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101, USA
2Institute of Functional Nanomaterials, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR, USA
3Department of Physics, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, San Juan, PR 00925, USA
4School of EECS, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA
5Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, San Juan, PR 00925, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to M. Sajjad; ude.ukw@dajjas.dammahum

Received 16 October 2017; Revised 18 February 2018; Accepted 13 March 2018; Published 12 April 2018

Academic Editor: Raphael Schneider

Copyright © 2018 M. Sajjad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The combination of nanomaterial graphene quantum dots (GQDs) with magnetic nanoparticles offers a unique set of optical and magnetic properties for future energy and medical applications. We report on the synthesis and engineering of GQDs and iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanocomposites (NCs) by using a pulsed laser discharge technique. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images showed a high yield of pure GQDs with 2–10 nm diameter. The hexagonal structures and lattice fringes associated with the C–C bond in GQDs were clearly identifiable. The structural and optical changes in GQDs and GQDs-Fe3O4 NC samples induced by UV light were investigated by the absorption and emission spectroscopy over the deep UV–visible spectral range. The photoluminescence spectra have shown subband ππ transitions in GQDs-Fe3O4 NC. Magnetic properties of the GQDs-Fe3O4 NC samples have shown room temperature ferromagnetism induced by pure Fe3O4 nanoparticles and from the substantial spin polarized edges of GQD nanoparticles. It is concluded that the observed optical and magnetic properties could be further tailored in the studied nanocomposites for prospective medical applications.

1. Introduction

Zero-dimensional, graphene quantum dots (GQDs) [1, 2] have shown exceptional physical and chemical properties [3] including, among others, photoluminescence, chemical stability, and pronounced quantum confinement effect making them attractive for novel optoelectronic and energy-related applications [4]. In addition, due to low toxicity [5], GQDs have significant potential to be used in the field of biophysics and medical sciences as active and passive agents, where they have shown great promise in future therapies for photodynamic treatment of cancerous tumors, imaging, and drug delivery applications [6].

Although nanomaterials including GQDs have already shown numerous properties suitable for biomedical applications [7, 8], there still remain substantial complexities involved in handling specific drug delivery dynamics and precise drug dosage control treatments [9]. Some of these complexities can be alleviated by combining the optical properties of GQDs and magnetic properties of iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanocomposites (NCs) [10]. These NCs can be bound to drugs, proteins, enzymes, antibodies, or nucleotides and directed to an organ, tissue, or tumor by using an external magnetic field [10]. Moreover, the magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles make them an excellent contrast agent for MRI applications. However, the limitations of magnetic nanoparticles, including aggregation and precipitation inside the body vessels, can cause serious consequences [11]. As a solution, surface engineering of Fe3O4 with GQDs was proposed to prevent aggregation and make applications more feasible. On the other hand, GQDs have already shown excellent luminescence response when exposed to the UV light, resulting in visible light emission, whose frequencies depend on the QD’s size [12]. Thus, the properties of GQDs can be further tailored by integration with carrier particles (e.g., Fe3O4) as surface decoration or directly embedded into a specific lattice site of NC [13].

In this paper, we report the synthesis and engineering of GQDs-Fe3O4 NCs by using a pulsed laser discharge technique in order to tailor the optical and magnetic properties of the material for selected biomedical and/or optoelectronic applications.

2. Experimental Approach

The size-selected GQDs and GQDs-Fe3O4 NCs were synthesized via a bottom-up approach using pulsed laser-induced irradiation in solution as reported earlier by Habiba et al. [14] with some modifications in experimental parameters. Specifically, the bottom-up method involves photolytic cracking of C6H6 by laser irradiation in the illuminated region of solution. At the same time, the catalytic particles enhance the interactions between the carbon-containing fragments and stimulate forming C–C bonds needed to develop graphene QDs of variable diameter ranging from 2 nm to 7 nm. Typically, using the selected approach, one can produce GQDs with hydrogen rich surfaces that could be functionalized later with other reagents. In our experiments, first we prepared the mixture of 15 mg nickel (II) oxide (NiO) powder (Alfa Aesar, green), 50 mg polyethlene glycol, and 50 mg iron (II, III) oxide (Fe3O4) powder, respectively. The compounds were ultrasonicated in 20 mL of benzene (Sigma-Aldrich, anhydrous 99.8%) for 20 minutes. Next, the solution was irradiated with a laser pulses at 1,064 nm wavelength generated by Nd : YAG laser (Continuum Surelite, 10 Hz, 10 ns pulse width) as shown in Figure 1. Under these optimized conditions, we obtained a high yield of 1-2 nm GQDs product. The given conditions are also suitable for engineering the GQDs-Fe3O4 NC.

Figure 1: Schematic diagram showing synthesis setup for achieving GQDs and GQDs-Fe3O4 NC.

The typical laser power density was adjusted to 15.9 × 108 Wcm−2, corresponding to an optical energy of 30 mJ/pulse. Following the synthesis, the residual solid was filtered out from the irradiated mixture leaving behind a solution containing GQD-Fe3O4 NC in benzene. This solution was then heated up from room temperature to 370 K with a heat ramping rate of 10 K/min to evaporate solvent and get GQD-Fe3O4 NC. During the GQD-Fe3O4 NC separation process, we used a rotary vacuum evaporator to remove the excess benzene. Finally, the GQD-Fe3O4 NC was then dissolved in deionized water to produce a concentrated paste for further investigation. The same procedure was repeated to synthesize pure GQDs without Fe3O4 nanopowder.

Samples were characterized with a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) (JEOL JEM-2200FS TEM operated at 200 kV). The UV–visible spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 1E UV spectrophotometer. For PL characterizations, the excitation and emission spectra of the GQD solutions were recorded using Varian Cary Eclipse with xenon lamp as an excitation source. The magnetic measurements of pure GQDs, iron (II, III) oxide powder, and Fe3O4-GQD NC were performed using a vibrating-sample magnetometer (VSM, Lake Shore 736) at room temperature. The magnetization (M) versus magnetic field (H) and M-H loops were measured at 300 K and in the magnetic field range (15 kOe ≤ H ≤ 15 kOe), respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

The electron microscopy results of as-synthesized pure GQDs and GQDs-Fe3O4 NCs are shown in Figures 2(a)2(f). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images (Figures 2(a)2(c)) show a uniform dispersion of GQDs, whereas the inset shows the size distribution statistical analysis of as-synthesized GQDs. The experimental conditions were optimized for achieving the GQDs synthesis high yield with a narrow particle size distribution between 1 and 2 nm diameter. The high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image and the corresponding fast Fourier transform pattern (see the inset in Figure 2(c)) indicate that the GQDs are of a good crystalline quality and have a honeycomb lattice structure, where C atoms are clearly identifiable (Figure 2(c)). Figures 2(d)2(f) show the HRTEM images of GQDs-Fe3O4 NC collected at 200 nm, 50 nm, and 10 nm scales, respectively. Figure 2(d) shows several dark nanoparticles of Fe3O4 with diameter less than 100 nm. The magnified image of a selected single Fe3O4 nanoparticle at scale 50 nm seen in Figure 2(e) clearly shows several nanoparticles (indicated by arrows) attached to the Fe3O4 particle surface. The image shown in Figure 2(f) collected at 10 nm scale identifies that these small particles have carbon traces that confirms that the GQDs are attached to the Fe3O4 surface.

Figure 2: (a, b, c) HRTEM image of pure GQDs and GQDs size hexagonal structure. (d, e, f) HRTEM images of GQDs-Fe3O4 NC discussed in the text. Arrows in (e) indicate a GQD decorated with Fe3O4 particles seen as dark dots.

The structural and optical property changes in NC were studied by monitoring optical absorption and photoluminescence spectra under UV excitation. Figure 3 shows optical absorption spectra due to the ππ transition in pure GQDs (black curve) peaking at 215 nm and in GQDs-Fe3O4 NC (red curve) peaking at 260 nm, respectively. The spectral shift observed in the absorption band peak positions is probably due to electronic transitions between GQDs and Fe3O4 particles. Furthermore, the shape of the GQDs-Fe3O4 NC absorption band is complex due to overlap with sharp peaks observed at 245 nm, 250 nm, 255 nm, and 260 nm. We assign these sharp peaks to the ππ transition vibration subbands between (C6H6)n and Fe3O4 nanoparticle. The inset in Figure 3(a) shows optical images of GQDs and GQDs-Fe3O4 aqueous solution (DI water) illuminated under UV light. It is seen that, under 365 nm excitation, the emitted light color from the GQD dispersion changes to blue-green suggesting the existence of transition states between iron core particle and the GQDs attached to Fe3O4 [15]. Figure 3(b) shows the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of studied samples when excited at 450 nm. The resulting PL spectra of GQDs dispersion are composed of three subbands peaking at 536 nm, 558 nm, and 580 nm, respectively, corresponding to radiative emission from GQDs having different sizes [16]. In the case of GQDs-Fe3O4 NC, the luminescence intensity doubles, and the PL spectrum shape is broadened and evolved as compared to the GQDs counterpart [1719]. Moreover, the observed blue shift effect can be assigned to the GQD π-system polarization effects induced by Fe3O4 nanoparticle combined with the GQD system. Since Fe3O4 has a higher electron affinity than GQD, the induced polarization effect creates an increased energy gap in optically active GQD; that is, such an effect induces a blue shift.

Figure 3: (a) Room temperature UV-visible absorption spectra of GQDs (black) and GQDs-Fe3O4 (red). Inset in (a) shows optical images of the emitting GQDs and GQDs-Fe3O4 aqueous solution (DI water) when excited at 365 nm. (b) Room temperature PL spectra of GQDs (upper panel) and GQDs-Fe3O4 NC (lower panel) excited at 450 nm.

The three emission subbands observed for GDQs appeared in GQDs-Fe3O4 NC also but at slightly different wavelengths (Figure 3(b)) which confirm that they originate from pure GQDs. An extra subband component appeared at 568 nm which was not previously observed and is assigned to the ππ transition in GQDs-Fe3O4 NC. Furthermore, the observed PL spectra can be considered to arise from transitions from the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital in Fe3O4 to the highest occupied molecular orbital in GQDs. We conclude that, in both cases, the observed PL spectra are assigned to ππ transitions; however in the case of NC, this transition can be also affected by an increase in the absorption cross section due to the interaction between GQDs and Fe3O4 in NC. This assumption is based on the fact that since the physical and chemical properties of GQDs-Fe3O4 NC change considerably at the nanoscale level, the optical properties also change. It was shown that not only the size of the polymeric structures within the quantum dots can change their emissions, but also surface functionalization can tune resulting luminescence through modulating material band gap [20, 21]. Therefore, one can conclude that GQDs possess a tunable energy band gap where the shift in the spectral position can be controlled by attaching GQDs to different nanoparticles [22].

We conclude that such materials might be useful in medical treatments [23] relying on the facts that graphene-based nanomaterials have already shown strong optical absorption in the near-infrared region, and that the GQDs-Fe3O4 NC are optically active. Therefore, heat can be generated efficiently under light irradiation. Thus, raising temperature at tissue sites by using absorbing NC can promote the selective destruction of affected cells when used for the photothermal therapy [23].

The optical spectrum of Fe3O4 was not recorded because this compound is not soluble in solvents used in our study—it forms a suspension, where Fe3O4 particles can be considered as black bodies with respect to the optical absorption properties of an active medium. Therefore, the light absorption efficiency is the same across the scanned spectral range, and it is free from any characteristic absorption bands. A small deviation from the black body approximation may give some scattering effects; however, this was not considered here. Anyhow, Fe3O4 material does not show any emission by itself; however, the GQDs-Fe3O4 NC generates interesting optical features as presented above.

We have studied the magnetic properties of GQDs, GQDs-Fe3O4, and Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles involved in the synthesized NCs. We observed that the Fe3O4 powder with particle size between 50 and 60 nm exhibits a strong magnetization curve as shown in Figure 4(a). It is seen that the magnetization curve of a Fe3O4 sample shows a hysteresis loop; that is, nanoparticles of interest maintain the domain structure and thus is considered as ferromagnetic. Analysis of the respective magnetization hysteresis loop indicated that its magnetic permeability is 6,487, which is in acceptable agreement with the reported earlier value of 6,783 [24].

Figure 4: Experimental magnetization curves of Fe3O4 powder (a), GQDs (b), and GQD-Fe3O4 NC (c) while (a′), (b′), and (c′) panels correspond to fitting curves using (2). (d, d′) direct comparison and fitting data showing magnetic properties of reference Fe3O4 powder data (curve 1), GQD-Fe3O4 composite (curve 2, data factorized with factor 40), and pure GQD (curve 3, data factorized with factor 800).

The pure GQDs magnetization curve is shown in Figure 4(b), and it does not demonstrate any hysteretic behavior. The magnetization curve measured at 300 K is practically saturated. Since samples were prepared under an atmosphere containing oxygen, we may not exclude the presence of some parasitic oxide phase which may contribute to the overall magnetic response of the studied samples. On the other hand, the zigzag edge atoms, adatoms, or vacancies are all believed to cause magnetic moments in graphene [25]. Because of these facts, the observed magnetic phenomenon cannot be explained unambiguously by applying a simple paramagnetic model, that is, the Brillouin relationship for magnetization:where is the number of paramagnetic centers per gram of the sample, is the electron spin factor (the Landé factor), is the Bohr magneton, is the Boltzmann constant, is the absolute temperature, is the magnetic field directed along the axis of the reference-fixed frame, and . To explain the observed phenomenon, we proposed that some of the paramagnetic centers in the GQD particle are coupled by strong exchange interactions, creating a ground electronic state of such system with total spin angular momentum of , where is the number of centers in the GQD particle and . To analyze the magnetization curve for the materials under consideration, we adopted an approach based on the Zeeman sublevels for spin angular momentum , where the lowest energy level has a spin angular momentum projection on the field direction. We were then able to determine the magnetic moment of sample for using the following equation:where is the electron -factor, is the Bohr magneton, is the auxiliary magnetic field, is the total spin number, and other parameters are as defined above. Taking into account (2), we fitted the magnetization data for GQDs shown in Figure 4(b) and obtained an acceptable fit, shown in Figure 4(b′), for . On the other hand, we have to assume that “averaged” GQDs consist of 434 paramagnetic centers strongly coupled by an exchange interaction [26]. Taking into account the averaged GQD size of 2–4 nm and carbon (C) atom radius 0.075 nm, we estimate the number of C atoms in a typical GQD to be about 2,844. Estimated magnetic permeability for such a sample is then close to 4.8 ± 1.3. Data shown in Figure 4(c) for combined GQD-Fe3O4 NC with averaged size of 15 nm do not demonstrate magnetization hysteresis behavior. In order to explain the data shown in Figure 4(c), we used the same theoretical approach developed above for pure GQD. We applied (2) to fit data shown in Figure 4(c) and obtained an acceptable fit as represented in Figure 4(c′). This fitting curve gives where 1,346 unpaired spins in GQD-Fe3O4 NC are strongly coupled by the exchange interaction and the expected ground state of such NC shall have a multiplicity of 1,347. The estimated magnetic permeability of GQD-Fe3O4 NC is about 124 ± 8. Figures 4(d) and 4(d′) shows a direct comparison between the experimental data and the theoretical fits with respect to the referenced magnetic properties of Fe3O4 powder (curve a), GQD-Fe3O4 NC (curve b, data factorized with factor 40), and pure GQD (curve c, data factorized with factor 800), respectively.

It was shown by Sun et al. [27] that pure GQDs demonstrate diamagnetic and paramagnetic properties at low temperature. In their case, the magnetization curve measured at 2 K demonstrated a saturation effect, and it was fit with high accuracy by (1) where the value of the fitting parameter was about 0.5, that is, with high accuracy equal to the electron spin angular momentum. Those data differ from the data reported here because these effects can be neglected at 300 K. We believe that the observed difference can be explained based on the GQD structure at hand. In the present case, the materials synthesis process is carried out in air at atmospheric pressure resulting, possibly, in GQD-O structure formation what ultimately can result in high exchange interaction between the paramagnetic centers of this material. Figure 4 shows the corresponding magnetization fits for Fe3O4 nanopowder, GQD-Fe3O4 composite, and pure GQDs, respectively. We factorized the data with factor of 40 for GQDs-Fe3O4 and with the factor of 800 for GQD in order to enhance their relative intensity as compared to reference pure Fe3O4 nanopowder. It is clearly seen that the GQDs-Fe3O4 NCs exhibit strong enhancement of their magnetic moment as compared to pure GQDs. Therefore, we have concluded here that the magnetic properties of studied NCs can be useful for guiding delivery and targeting the specific tissues and cells using an external magnetic field.

By engineering Fe3O4 with GQDs NCs where optical and magnetic properties are linked together, a new generation of theranostic functionalities can be developed. Such novel hybrid NCs will be suitable for delivering nanocarriers to the tumor sites for imaging, whereas the NCs optical feature can be used as photothermal therapy agents to kill cancer cells efficiently [2830]. Therefore, the NCs offering both optical and magnetic capabilities may provide an interesting approach for the future medical treatments.

We have grown highly crystalline, honeycomb lattice structure of 2–10 nm GQDs using a pulsed laser photolysis technique in a bottom-up approach. It was shown that the GQDs are luminescent in the green spectral region and that their optical properties can be further tailored by engineered GQDs-Fe3O4 NC. The pure and engineered quantum dot samples showed different emission spectra due to the subband ππ transitional states between GQDs and Fe3O4 nanoparticles. GQDs-Fe3O4 NCs have shown ferromagnetism originating partially from pure Fe3O4 nanopowder and from the substantial spin polarized edges of GQDs. We have demonstrated that not only the QD’s size but also the surface functionalization of nanomaterials with GQDs can tune the optical properties of the nanomaterials. Such properties of the functionalized nanocompounds can lead, among others, to novel electronic, energy-related, and advanced biomedical applications including cancer treatments, tumor imaging, and dose delivery to the desired cell or tissue for a successful therapeutic effect.


Diagram of the Zeeman sublevels for system with spin angular momentum is shown in Figure 5 where lowest energy level has spin angular momentum projection on the field direction . Energy of Zeeman sublevel is determined as follows:where meaning of all parameters included in this relationship is defined in the text. If we will assign to lowest by energy Zeeman level () zero energy, energy of spin states will be redetermined as follows:

Figure 5: Schematic representation of the Zeeman state structure for system with total spin angular momentum in the presence of an external magnetic field .

Taking into account the Boltzmann distribution, population of Zeeman spin states can be defined as follows:where was defined in the text as number density of GQD-Fe3O4 composite species. Therefore, magnetic moment “” of one nanocrystal is determined as follows:

Or, for , it can be represented as follows:

Thus, reduced material magnetization (emu/g) can be defined as follows:

For case of , factor in front of sum (A.5) can be rewritten as follows:

Therefore, (A.5) can be represented as follows:

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This project was partially supported by the Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF Grant 1002410), PR NASA Space Grant (NASA Grant no. NNX15AI11H), and PR NASA EPSCoR (NASA Grant no. NNX15AK43A). The authors would like to acknowledge the Center for Electrochemical Engineering Research (CEER) through the award NSF-MRI no. CBET-1126350 for the access to TEM facility at Ohio University. W. M. Jadwisienczak acknowledges the support from the NSF CAREER program under no. DMR-1056493. M. Sajjad would like to recognize Mr. Oscar Resto for TEM analysis support in the Nanoscopy Facility at the University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Also, M. Sajjad thanks Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, for providing experimental and characterization facilities for data analysis. The TEM analysis was conducted by Yuxuan Wang currently at The University of Texas at Dallas.


  1. J. Zhang, Y.-Q Ma, N. Li et al., “Preparation of graphene quantum dots and their application in cell imaging,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2016, Article ID 9245865, 9 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. K. Chua, Z. Sofer, P. Simek et al., “Synthesis of strongly fluorescent graphene quantum dots by cage-opening buckminsterfullerene,” ACS Nano, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2548–2555, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Suzuki, Y. Wang, P. Elvati et al., “Chiral graphene quantum dots,” ACS Nano, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1744–1755, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Ozfidan, A. D. Güçlü, M. Korkusinski, and P. Hawrylak, “Theory of optical properties of graphene quantum dots,” Physica Status Solidi (RRL)–Rapid Research Letters, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 102–110, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Wang, I. S. Cole, and Q. Li, “The toxicity of graphene quantum dots,” RSC Advances, vol. 6, no. 92, pp. 89867–89878, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. X. Yan, X. Cui, B. Li, and L.-S. Li, “Large, solution-processable graphene quantum dots as light absorbers for photovoltaics,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1869–1873, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Colombo, S. C. Romero, M. F. Casula et al., “Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 4306–4334, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Z. Wang, H. Zeng, L. Sun, and J. Mater, “Graphene quantum dots: versatile photoluminescence for energy, biomedical, and environmental applications,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1157–1165, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. X. Wang, X. Sun, J. Lao et al., “Multifunctional graphene quantum dots for simultaneous targeted cellular imaging and drug delivery,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 122, pp. 638–644, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. K. Gupta and M. Gupta, “Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 3995–4021, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Alegreta, A. Criadoa, and M. Pratoto, “Recent advances of graphene-based hybrids with magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 529–536, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Tang, R. Ji, X. Li, K. S. Teng, and S. P. Lau, “Size-dependent structural and optical characteristics of glucose-derived graphene quantum dots,” Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 523–531, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Qu, M. Zheng, J. Li, Z. Xie, and Z. Sun, “Tailoring color emissions from N-doped graphene quantum dots for bioimaging applications,” Light: Science and Applications, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1–8, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. K. Habiba, V. I. Makarov, J. Avalos, M. J.F. Guinel, B. R. Weiner, and G. Morell, “Luminescent graphene quantum dots fabricated by pulsed laser synthesis,” Carbon, vol. 64, pp. 341–350, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Shen, Y. Zhu, X. Yang, and C. Li, “Graphene quantum dots: emergent nanolights for bioimaging, sensors, catalysis and photovoltaic devices,” Chemical Communications, vol. 48, no. 31, pp. 3686–3699, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Qiu, R. Zhang, J. Li et al., “Fluorescent graphene quantum dots as traceable, pH-sensitive drug delivery systems,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 10, pp. 6709–6724, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. D. Güçlü, P. Potasz, M. Korkusinski, and P. Hawrylak, Graphene Quantum Dots, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2014.
  18. R. Shimano, G. Yumoto, J. Y. Yoo et al., “Quantum Faraday and Kerr rotations in graphene,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, p. 1841, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Narita, X. Y. Wang, V. Feng, and K. Müllen, “New advances in nanographene chemistry,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 44, no. 18, pp. 6616–6643, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. B. Bourlinos, A. Stassinopoulos, D. Anglos, R. Zboril, M. Karakassides, and E. P. Giannelis, “Surface functionalized carbogenic quantum dots,” Small, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 455–458, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Kim, S. W. Hwang, M.-K. Kim et al., “Anomalous behaviors of visible luminescence from graphene quantum dots: interplay between size and shape,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 8203–8208, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. Xu, L. F. Gerlein, X. Ma, C. R. Haughn, M. F. Doty, and S. G. Cloutier, “Impact of different surface ligands on the optical properties of PbS quantum dot solids,” Materials, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1858–1870, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Yang, L. Feng, X. Shi, and Z. Liu, “Nano-graphene in biomedicine: theranostic applications,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 530–547, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Kittel, Quantum Theory of Solid, John-Wiley & Son Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1963.
  25. M. Hasanzadeh, A. Karimzadeh, N. Shadjou et al., “Graphene quantum dots decorated with magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, electrodeposition, characterization and application as an electrochemical sensor towards determination of some amino acids at physiological pH,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 68, pp. 814–830, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Candini, S. Lumetti, C. Godfrin et al., “Addressing a single molecular spin with graphene-based nanoarchitectures,” in Advances in Atom and Single Molecule Machines, pp. 165–184, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  27. Y. Sun, Y. Zheng, H. Pan et al., “Magnetism of graphene quantum dots,” npj Quantum Materials, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. R. Justin, K. Tao, S. Román et al., “Photoluminescent and superparamagnetic reduced graphene oxide–iron oxide quantum dots for dual-modality imaging, drug delivery and photothermal therapy,” Carbon, vol. 97, pp. 54–70, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. Alegreta, A. Criadoa, and M. Pratoto, “Recent advances of graphene-based hybrids with magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 529–536, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Z. L. Wu, M. X. Gao, T. T. Wang, X. Y. Wan, L. L. Zheng, and C. Z. Huang, “A general quantitative pH sensor developed with dicyandiamide N-doped high quantum yield graphene quantum dots,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 3868–3874, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus