Activated Hydrotalcites Obtained by Coprecipitation as Photocatalysts for the Degradation of 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

Table 6

Comparison of different photocatalysts used in 2,4,6-trichlorophenol photodegradation.

Photocatalyst	Initial concentration	Experimental condition	Dose (g/L)	Time (min), degradation (%)	Ref.
ZnO-Fe	20 mg/L	65 W, UV-Vis	1	120, 98	[61]
TiO2@Fe3O4-Au	0.1 µM (0.02 mg/L)	105 W, Xe UV-Vis	1	50, 90	[62]
TiO2-La	10 µM (2 mg/L)	UV-Vis	2	60, 85	[63]
ZnO powder	50 mg/L	6 W, UV lamp	0.75	90, 84	[64]
MMT-Cu H2O2	0.1 mM (20 mg/L)	—	0.18	60, 95	[19]
PMS-C	50 mg/L	—	0.75	75, 60	[65]
CdS	200 mg/L	UVC	0.65	180, 88.74	[66]
MCM41-Fe, Co, Ni-H2O2	2 mM (400 mg/L)	UV-Vis	2	300, 65	[67]
ZrO2-polianilyne	5 µM (1 mg/L)	300 W, UV-Vis	0.5	240, 75	[68]
LDH-Cu	1 mg/L	300 W, Xe UV-Vis	0.5	210, 95.1	[69]
Hydrotalcite (this work)	100 mg/L	UV-Vis	1	120, 100