Review Article

A Cutting-Edge Survey of Tribological Behavior Evaluation Using Artificial and Computational Intelligence Models

Table 1

Comparison of materials with the pin-on-disc wear test and the results observed.

Materials usedTests performedResults observedRef.

The unreinforced portion was made of aluminum alloy (Al-2014). Various SiC particles were added to the Al alloy as a reinforcing substance.Pin-on-disc wear testWith the increase in grain size, weight loss was observed to increase. It was discovered that composites with larger particle sizes had better wear resistance.[16]
AZ91D alloyPin-on-discDue to the relative motion of AZ91D and stainless steel, frictional heat is generated, which affects the rate of wear.[17]
1. Nylon gears
2. Acetal gear pairs
Pin-on-discThe acetal gear pair has a higher wear rate than the nylon gear pair. Each acetal gear pair has a sliding speed threshold above which the wear rate dramatically increases.[18]
A substrate made of BBS: LM 11 alloys was used, which was reinforced with (a) SiC particles and (b) SiC fibers for producing composites.Pin-on-discThe wear rate of the base alloy with no reinforcements was the highest, while the composites had the lowest wear rate. Because of a solid particle-matrix interface, the alloy reinforced with SiC particles had a low wear rate, whereas the alloy reinforced with SiC fibers had a higher wear rate due to a weak fiber-matrix interface.[19]
Glass fiber-reinforced polyphenylene sulfide polymers
APK polymer
POM polymer
UHMWPE polymer
PA66 polymer
Pin-on-discA constant rate of steady-state wear was observed.
POM polymer observed the highest wear out of all. It had the highest wear rate across all sliding distances.
[20]
147 Al alloy matrix composite containing the following:
1. 10% B4C
2. 15% B4C
3. 20% B4C
4. 4147 Al/SiC composite
Pin-on-discDue to stronger SiC particle binding to the alloy matrix, Al/SiC matrix alloys outperformed AL/B4C alloys in terms of wear resistance.[21]
Aluminum syntactic foamPin-on-discThe wear rate decreased as the sliding velocity increased.
Despite its porous nature, this material showed strong wear resistance.
[22]
Untreated G3500 cast iron and S0050A cast steel
Treated G4TG3500 cast iron and TS0050A cast steel
Pin-on-discUntreated and treated cast iron outperformed untreated cast steel in wear resistance.
Both EPN-treated substrates outperformed untreated substrates in terms of wear resistance.
[23]
1. AA6061 alloy
2. AA6061 + 20 vol.% Saffil
3. AA6061 + 20 vol.% SiCp
4. AA6061 + 11 vol.% Saffil + 20% SiCp
5. AA6061 + 60 vol.% SiCp
Pin-on-disc testWeight loss was found to decrease as the volume percent of the reinforcement was increased.
Wear resistance was highest in the 60 percent SiCp composite.
[24]
1. PEEK
2. PEK
3. PEKK
1. Pin-on-disc test
2. Abrasion test on rubber wheels
A linear increment in wear volume was observed with sliding distance and sliding load increase.[25]
1. Alloy 2014
2. Alloy 2024
3. Cast alloy 201 containing Al2O3 and SiC
Pin-on-discWear resistance was higher in aluminum matrices with a high weight percent with no metallic component.
SiC-containing alloys showed a substantial change.
[26]
1. Grey cast iron
2. A356/25SiCp aluminum metal matrix composite
Pin-on-discMMCs have a slightly lower wear rate than grey cast iron.[27]
1. Al
2. Al + 10 SiC
3. Al + 20 SiC
4. Al + 30 SiC
5. Al + 40 SiC
Pin-on-discResistance to wear for Al-SiC MMC is reported to be more significant than that to Al; with an increase in reinforcement volume, wear resistance reportedly increased.[28]
Ti-6Al-4V alloy without thermal oxidation and Ti-6Al-4V alloy with thermal oxidationPin-on-discThe handled specimen has shallower and thinner wear tracks than the untreated alloy.[29]
1. Al-SiC-Gr composites
2. Al-SiC composites
Pin-on-discAl-SiC composites displayed lower resistance to wear than Al-SiC-Gr hybrid composites.[30]
Commercially available pure Al and aluminum-scandium alloyPin-on-discThe aluminum-scandium alloy outperformed the pure industrial alloy in terms of wear resistance.[31]
1. PEEK
2. 20 wt.% GF-PEEK
3. 30 wt.% GF-PEEK
4. 30 wt.% CF-PEEK
Pin-on-discAccording to the pin-on-ring sliding test, PEEK has a higher wear resistance than other thermoplastics.
Carbon fibers outperformed glass fibers in terms of wear resistance.
[32]
Al-7Si alloy reinforced with the following:
1. 0 wt.%
2. 5 wt.%
3. 10 wt.% TiB2
Pin-on-discThe wear rate decreased with an increase in TiB2 content in the alloy.[33]
1. Mg-9Al
2. Mg-9Al with SiC-reinforced composite
Pin-on-discDue to high load-bearing capacity, the composite displayed significant wear resistance.[34]
Brushes made of copper and graphiteWear test with a pin-on-slip ringUnder 30 kPa BSP, arc erosion wear was the dominant wear process; abrasion wear was dominant above 120 kPa BSP.[35]
18 polymers were examinedPin-on-discPA 66-PTFE, POM-PTFE, PETP-PTFE, and PEEK-PTFE may be used in dry air.
PA 66, PA 66-PTFE, and POM are the best materials for use in water.
[36]