Research Article
Optimization of Mechanical Crimping in the Terminal Crimping Process Using a Response Surface Methodology
Table 2
Experimental design and results.
| Variables (real value) | Response avg. | Crimp height (X) | Crimp depth (Y) | Crimp width (Z) |
| 1.15 | 1.96 | 1.37 | 7.30 | 1.35 | 1.96 | 1.37 | 6.85 | 1.15 | 2.75 | 1.37 | 7.30 | 1.35 | 2.75 | 1.37 | 7.35 | 1.15 | 1.96 | 1.59 | 7.24 | 1.35 | 1.96 | 1.59 | 6.61 | 1.15 | 2.75 | 1.59 | 7.01 | 1.35 | 2.75 | 1.59 | 6.63 | 1.08 | 2.36 | 1.48 | 5.70 | 1.42 | 2.36 | 1.48 | 5.58 | 1.25 | 1.69 | 1.48 | 9.65 | 1.25 | 3.02 | 1.48 | 9.65 | 1.25 | 2.36 | 1.30 | 8.75 | 1.25 | 2.36 | 1.67 | 9.13 | 1.25 | 2.36 | 1.48 | 13.62 | 1.25 | 2.36 | 1.48 | 13.55 | 1.25 | 2.36 | 1.48 | 13.59 | 1.25 | 2.36 | 1.48 | 13.65 | 1.25 | 2.36 | 1.48 | 13.39 | 1.25 | 2.36 | 1.48 | 13.64 |
|
|