Multicriteria Evaluation of Urban Regeneration Processes: An Application of PROMETHEE Method in Northern Italy
Table 1
Evaluation criteria for the PROMETHEE model [Table 1 is reproduced from Bottero et al. [11]].
Criteria
Description
C1 Public/private spaces
Ratio between public and private surfaces
C2 Co-working spaces
Surface of the structures for workshop, meeting, training courses
C3 Co-housing inhabitants
Number of residents in new co-housing buildings
C4 Permeable surface/territorial surface
Ratio between permeable areas and overall territorial surface of the program
C5 Urban gardens
Total area used for community and private urban gardens
C6 Waste production
Amount of waste produced in a year by the activities of the program
C7 Residential areas
Surface for residential functions
C8 Retail areas
Surfaces for commercial functions
C9 Sport and leisure areas
Surfaces for sport and cultural activities
C10 Mixité index
Index that describes the functional mix of the area
C11 Slow mobility
Surface of the pedestrian tracks and bicycle lanes
C12 New public parking
Number of new public parking lots
C13 Car sharing/bike sharing
Number of car and bike sharing points
C14 Total Economic Value
Estimate of the social benefits delivered by the program
C15 Investment cost
Total cost of the program
C16 New jobs
Number of new jobs created
C17 Regeneration
Regenerated surface
C18 Via De Amicis regeneration
Qualitative index showing the level of the regeneration of Via De Amicis
C19 Territorial index
Ratio between the maximum buildable volume and the territorial surface
We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.