Research Article
Optimum Groove Location of Hydrodynamic Journal Bearing Using Genetic Algorithm
Table 7
Comparison of optimum locations of grooves for two-groove and single-groove bearings.
| | Comparison | Objective function | | | |
| | For two groove | Minimum friction variable | 0.900 | 0 | 232.906 | | For single groove | 0.100 | 180 | — | | For two groove | Maximum flow | 0.899 | 5.66 | 301.96 | | For single groove | 0.100 | 180 | — | | For two groove | Maximum load | 0.899 | 0.626 | 308.23 | | For single groove | 0.657 | 349.038 | — | | For two groove | Maximum mass parameter | 0.811 | 0.890 | 308.23 | | For single groove | 0.704 | 223.435 | — | | For two groove | Optimization of all the combined objectives | 0.268 | 3.67 | 349.99 | | For single groove | 0.657 | 349.038 | — |
|
|
