Bioactive Potential of 3D-Printed Oleo-Gum-Resin Disks: B. papyrifera, C. myrrha, and S. benzoin Loading Nanooxides—TiO2, P25, Cu2O, and MoO3
Table 1
Antibacterial activity of materials against selected pathogenic strains.
Oleo-gum-resin
Inhibition zone (mm)
Nanooxide
S. aureus
E. coli
P. aeruginosa
C. albicans
M (pure)
3.0 ± 0.4
5.5 ± 0.6
2.4 ± 3.2
P (pure)
2.0 ± 1.0
3.1 ± 0.5
4.7 ± 0.88
4.4 ± 2.4
B (pure)
1.1 ± 1.1
4.0 ± 0.4
4.0 ± 2.5
1.8 ± 1.8
M + TiO2
5.2 ± 0.18
8.8 ± 0.32
7.2 ± 0.28
6.8 ± 0.15
M + P25
6.0 ± 0.97
6.4 ± 0.11
6.1 ± 0.35
6.1 ± 0.26
M + MoO3
5.5 ± 0.22
7.0 ± 0.20
6.6 ± 0.32
6.7 ± 0.92
M + Cu2O
5.0 ± 0.28
6.5 ± 0.91
6.4 ± 1.57
5.5 ± 0.36
P + TiO2
5.5 ± 1.55
8.0 ± 0.14
7.7 ± 1.90
6.0 ± 0.21
P + P25
5.8 ± 0.10
5.2 ± 0.26
6.2 ± 0.88
6.0 ± 1.74
P + MoO3
5.5 ± 0.23
6.5 ± 0.36
7.0 ± 0.30
6.9 ± 1.59
P + Cu2O
5.6 ± 1.81
8.0 ± 0.53
7.4 ± 1.39
6.6 ± 2.13
B + TiO2
6.0 + 0.38
7.7 ± 0.77
5.0 ± 1.80
6.8 ± 1.27
B + P25
7.6 ± 0.53
6.2 ± 0.65
4.5 ± 0.36
6.1 ± 2.05
B + MoO3
6.1 ± 1.70
8.3 ± 0.40
5.2 ± 1.24
6.5 ± 2.46
B + Cu2O
7.5 ± 1.15
7.0 ± 0.88
4.8 ± 0.36
7.1 ± 2.15
Note. The experiments were done in quadruplicate and the results were interpreted in terms of standard deviation of mean diameter of zone of inhibition.
