BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2009 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 201075 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/201075

Engineering and Directed Evolution of a Ca2+ Binding Site A-Deficient AprE Mutant Reveal an Essential Contribution of the Loop Leu75–Leu82 to Enzyme Activity

Academic Editor: George Makhatadze
Received12 Feb 2009
Revised17 May 2009
Accepted15 Jun 2009
Published20 Aug 2009

Abstract

An aprE mutant from B. subtilis 168 lacking the connecting loop which is predicted to encode a binding site was constructed. Expression of the mutant gene (aprE) produced B. subtilis colonies lacking protease activity. Intrinsic fluorescence analysis revealed spectral differences between wild-type AprE and AprE. An AprE variant with reestablished enzyme activity was selected by directed evolution. The novel mutations Met/Asp located in positions which are predicted to be important for catalytic activity were identified in this variant. Although these mutations restored hydrolysis, they had no effect with respect to thermal inactivation of AprE. These results support the proposal that in addition to function as a calcium binding site, the loop that connects -sheet e3 with -helix c plays a structural role on enzyme activity of AprE from B. subtilis 168.

1. Introduction

Currently, there is a high level of commercial interest for subtilisins that work under extreme biochemical conditions [1, 2]. Therefore, understanding the structure and function of subtilisins is fundamental to employing rational and directed evolution strategies in order to enhance activity and/or change substrate specificity for these proteins [3, 4]. However, there are structural motifs in subtilisin E (AprE) which have proven to affect enzyme activity and still remain uncharacterized. For instance, crystallographic analysis revealed that residues Leu75, Asn77, Ile79, and Val81 located in the connecting loop Leu75–Leu82 together with Gln2 and Asp41 form a calcium binding site (CBS) in subtilisin BPN' [5]. Furthermore, it is known that residues Gly83-Ser85, conserved among several members of the subtilisin family [6], form a stretch bend which lies at the C-terminal edge of the loop connecting -sheet e3 to -helix c. These residues are located 1.5 nm away from and on the opposite side of the catalytic residues Asp32, His64, and Ser221 [7]. Despite their far location from the catalytic residues, mutations in this region induce changes on both substrate specificity and enzyme activity of subtilisins. For instance, a single Ser85Ala mutation increased twice the kcat of B. subtilis 168 AprE [6], and a Val84Ile mutation not only increased the Km of subtilisin BPN’ but also adapted the enzyme to work at a lower than normal temperature [7].

Members of the subtilisin family usually possess two calcium binding sites (CBSs), named CBSA and CBSB [8]. Each CBS displays different affinity for the calcium ion [8]. In this report, evidence is presented supporting the idea that in addition to the role as a calcium binding site, the loop connecting -sheet e3 with -helix c (residues Leu75–Leu82) also plays an important role in the enzyme activity of subtilisin E from B. subtilis 168.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions

Bacterial strains used in this work are listed in Table 1. The growth medium used routinely was Luria-Bertani (LB) [9]. Preparation of competent E. coli and B. subtilis cells and their transformations were performed as previously described [10, 11].


Bacterial strainGenotype and descriptionReference or source

Bacillus subtilis
168trpC2W. Nicholson
1A751eglS 102 bglT/bglS EV aprE nprE his BGSC*
PERM222B. subtilis 1A751 containing pPERM222 (1.2 kbp PCR fragment containing wild-type aprE ORF subcloned in pUSH2This study
PERM570B. subtilis 1A751 eglS 102 bglT/bglS EV aprE nprE his mutM:Te , mutY:S , sodA:C containing pPERM494 (1.2 kbp BamHI fragment from aprE L75L82 cloned in PUSH2)This study
PERM505B. subtilis 1A751 containing pPERM494 (1.2 kbp BamHI fragment from aprE L75L82 cloned in PUSH2)This study
PERM658B. subtilis 1A751 containing pPERM669 (1.2 kbp BamHI fragment from aprE L75–L82 T66M G102D cloned in PUSH2)This study
PERM200B. subtilis 1A751 containing pUSH2 (E. coli-B. subtilis shuttle vector for C-terminal His(6)-tagging C , Ka [12])This study

*BGSC: Bacillus Genetic Stock Center.
2.2. Site-Directed Mutagenesis of AprE

Codons 75 through 82 from wild-type aprE [13, 14] were eliminated with the Altered Sites II Site-Directed Mutagenesis System Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) using the oligonucleotide -GCTTGGGCTAACGCC*AGCGGCAATCGTACC-3 (asterisk denotes the location of the in-frame deletion).

2.3. Random Mutagenesis of AprE

Random mutagenesis was carried out as follows. Strain B. subtilis PERM570 (Table 1) was grown to an O. of 0.5; the cell culture was supplemented with 2 mM H2O2 and incubated for 48 hours at 37°C. Cells were serially diluted, and aliquots of 100 L were inoculated on LB agar plates supplemented with skimmed milk. The plates were incubated 12 hours at 37°C, and colonies exhibiting caseinolytic activity were selected and transferred to a fresh plate. The plasmids of selected colonies were isolated and used to retransform B. subtilis 1A751 and E. coli DH5. The aprEL75–L82 variant generated through this protocol was fully sequenced on both strands.

2.4. Expression and Purification of Wild-Type and AprE Mutants

Wild-type aprE and aprE L75–L82 BamHI/BamHI fragments encoding the preproenzymes were cloned in plasmid pUSH2 [12] to introduce an in-frame six histidine-coding sequence at the end of both aprE sequences. This strategy generated the strains, E. coli PERM223 harboring pPERM222 (pUSH2-aprE) and E. coli PERM494 harboring pPERM494 (pUSH2-aprE L75–L82), respectively. Wild-type and AprE variants were expressed and purified from the culture media of B. subtilis 1A751 by metal affinity chromatography on a Ni-NTA-agarose column (Quiagen; Valencia, CA) as previously described [6]. Protein concentrations were determined by using the Coomassie (Bradford) Protein Assay Kit (Pierce; Rockford, IL).

2.5. Subtilisin Intrinsic Fluorescence (IF) Assays

Fluorescence spectra data were obtained after equilibration of a mixture containing 4 M of either wild-type or mutant AprEL75–L82 in 10 mM Pipes pH 7.5 at 25°C in the presence or absence of 0.5 mM EGTA in a spectrofluorophotometer RF-5301PC (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with both a thermostated cell and constant stirring. Fluorescence spectra were recorded between 280–450 nm upon exciting the protein at 280 nm.

2.6. Thermal Unfolding Followed by Intrinsic Fluorescence

Subtilisin E samples were placed into a 2 mL quartz cuvette; changes in intrinsic fluorescence were measured at 340 nm using an excitation wavelength of 280 nm (4 nm bandwidth) and emission wavelength from 300 to 400 nm (4 nm bandwidth). Temperature was ramped from 25 to 90°C with a 1°C min-1. Thermal unfolding data were normalized to where is the temperature in Kelvin where the enzyme was completely unfolded. Thermodynamic parameters were calculated by nonlinear least-squares fitting to following scheme.

Two-state model between native () and unfolded () states . Data were analyzed using the thermal following equation:

where is temperature in , is the temperature at midpoint, and is the enthalpy at the , respectively.

2.7. Enzyme Kinetics

The synthetic peptide Succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide (s-AAPF-p-Na, Sigma Chemical Co. St. Louis, MO) was used as substrate; assays were performed in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 5 mM CaCl2 at 37°C. The amount of p-nitroanilide released was measured by recording the absorbance increase at 410 nm. Enzyme activity was expressed as units/mg protein. Velocity data were fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation by nonlinear regression.

2.8. Thermal Stability of the Enzymes

Purified wild-type or variant AprE enzymes (0.7 mg/mL) were incubated in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and varying concentrations of both CaCl2 (100 M–5 mM) and NaCl (0 or 100 mM). The wild-type and variant AprE were either previously treated or not with 100 M EDTA and then incubated on ice for 15 minutes before testing for thermal stability. The activity remaining after a given time of incubation was determined at 37°C using s-AAPF-pNa as the substrate. The temperatures tested for enzyme stability were between 50–65°C.

2.9. Data Analysis

Thermal inactivation kinetics for both WT and AprE variant were studied fitting the inactivation data to (3) by nonlinear regression and using the iterative program Microcal Origin, as described in studies of thermal enzyme inactivation [15]. The equation used was the following: where represents the (%) of residual activity at a given time (), is the initial relative activity, considered as 100%, and is the rate constant for enzyme inactivation in min-1. Equation (3) describes a one-step process (4) for enzyme inactivation; from the native () to the inactive state ():

3. Results and Discussion

Mutations in the stretch bend Gly83-Ser85 lying at the C-terminal edge of the loop connecting the -sheet e3 with the -helix c of AprE led to changes on both substrate specificity and enzyme activity of subtilisins [6, 7]. These findings strongly suggest that this region has an important structural role for enzyme activity in AprE. Therefore, this loop was eliminated by site-directed mutagenesis, and the resulting aprE L75L82 mutant gene (Figure 1) was expressed in B. subtilis 1A751, a strain lacking protease activity as determined on casein plates (Figure 1). In fact, the cell free culture medium of this strain possessed no activity against hide powder azure and only 3% of the activity showed by the strain expressing the wild-type aprE gene against azocasein (Results not shown). A version of subtilisin BPN' lacking the CBSA and containing stabilizing mutations has been previously produced [16, 17]. Refolding of this protein was greatly facilitated by the absence of the Ca-loop while retaining high levels of activity [17]. However, as described here in the absence of stabilizing mutations deletion of the CBSA on AprE resulted in a dramatic loss of enzyme activity. Therefore, the loop L75–L82 may be important for structural integrity of not only the binding site but also the active site.

Changes in intrinsic fluorescence are excellent for monitoring the polarity of Trp environment and hence are sensitive to protein conformation [18, 19]. Therefore, the emission fluorescence spectra of AprE and AprEL75–L82 were recorded with excitation at 280 nm. The AprEL75–L82 spectrum showed an emission maximum of 358 nm which was red-shifted by 14 nm relative to the peak of the wild-type AprE spectrum (Figure 2(a)). These data suggest that the side chains of the aromatic residues are more exposed to the solvent in AprEL75–L82. Moreover, as shown in Figure 2(a), the peak emission intensity of AprEL75–L82 is 1.9-fold higher compared to that of wild-type AprE. A comparative amino acid sequence analysis reveals that AprE and subtilisin BPN' share 86% similarity; in fact the three tryptophan residues existing in mature subtilisin BPN' (i.e., Trp106, Trp113, and Trp241) are present in equivalent positions in AprE (i.e., Trp residues 105, 112, and 240, resp.) [5, 20, 21]. On the other hand, a previous study suggested that in subtilisin BPN', Trp113, is virtually nonfluorescent; the largely exposed Trp241 contributes 20% of the fluorescence, whereas the partially exposed Trp106 accounts for the majority of the emission [22]. Therefore, the increased fluorescence intensity observed in AprEL75–L82 could be attributed to perturbations in the local environment of residues Trp105 and/or Trp112 which are located near to the deleted loop L75–L82.

As noted above, deletion of the loop 75–82 abolished the calcium binding potential at site A while leaving intact the calcium binding site B. To further investigate this notion, wild-type and mutant AprE proteins were incubated in the presence of 0.5 mM EGTA, a concentration enough to chelate C only from the CBSB [23]. As shown in Figure 2(b), elimination of C from CBSB induced in both enzymes a small decrease in their fluorescence intensity with respect to the nontreated native enzymes (Figure 2(b)). These results are in agreement with the presence of an intact CBSB in both the wild-type and the AprEL75–L82 enzymes.

The structural consequences of loop L75–L82 removal from AprE resulted in the lost not only of the CBSA but also of enzyme activity. Therefore, a directed evolution strategy was used to search for amino acid substitutions in the mutant enzyme that could restore enzyme activity. A plasmid containing aprE L75L82 was expressed in a hypermutagenic strain of B. subtilis deficient on the mutM mutY and sodA genes that also lacked protease activity as described above. After several rounds of mutagenesis for aprE L75L82, three colonies exhibiting extracellular protease activity against casein were recovered. The colony with the highest protease activity was selected to further characterize its phenotype; the clone was called aprE L75L82 Var1. Interestingly, the cell free culture medium of this strain recovered 27% and 65% of the activity exhibited by the strain expressing the wild-type aprE gene against hide powder azure and azocasein, respectively (Results not shown).

Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of aprE L75L82 Var1 revealed the existence of two nonsense mutations that resulted in amino acid substitutions, Thr66Met and Gly102Asp. The mutant gene named aprE L75L82T66MG102D was cloned in pUSH2, and the resulting construction was expressed in the protease deficient strain B. subtilis IA751 (Figure 1). Calculation of kinetic constants kcat and Km from initial rate measurements of hydrolysis of s-AAPF-pNa revealed that the relative catalytic efficiency of AprEL75–L82-T66M G102D was of around 7.4% as compared with the wild-type AprE enzyme (Table 2).


EnzymeKcat (s-1)Km (mM)kcat/Km (s-1 mM-1)% of relative activity

WT AprE 100
AprE L75–L82 T66M G102D 7.4

In order to understand the effect of these mutations in the structure of the AprEL75–L82 T66M G102D enzyme, the medium temperature of denaturation () was calculated for the three enzymes. Results showed that the value of AprEL75–L82 was around four degrees higher than that of the wild-type protein (Figure 3), indicative of a more stable enzyme. Interestingly, the value of the AprEL75–L82 T66M G102D mutant was between the values of the AprEL75–L82 and wild-type enzymes (Figure 3). These results suggest that the stabilities of the two variants are essentially the same.

The CBSA absence and compensatory mutations on the activity of AprEL75–L82 T66M G102D were determined. To this end, AprE and AprEL75–L82 T66M G102D were incubated with 0.1 mM C and 100 mM N, respectively. Under these incubation conditions, binding sites A and B of subtilisin BPN' were saturated 95% with C and N, respectively [24]. The kinetic parameters for thermal inactivation were calculated using (3) to better correlate the effect of amino acid residues substitutions (Thre66Met and Gly102Asp) on the calcium dependent stability of AprEL75–L82. Table 3 shows that at 50°C and C saturation, the wild-type AprE enzyme had a (half life) of 856 minutes. This value is six times higher than that of the AprEL75–L82 T66M G102D mutant. At 65°C and C saturation the half life of AprE was 9 times higher than that of AprEL75–L82 T66M G102D (Table 3). On the other hand, in the presence of 0.1 mM C, the for the wild-type enzyme was around 17 times higher than that of the mutant enzyme. However, in the presence of 0.1 mM EDTA, that is, in the absence of calcium, both enzymes showed a similar inactivation rate (Table 3). Therefore amino acid residues substitutions (Thre66Met and Gly102Asp) led to recover of enzyme activity but had no effect with respect to thermal inactivation of AprEL75–L82.


Assay conditionWT (10-4 min-1)WT (min)Var1 (10-4 min-1)Var1 (min)

5 mM C , 50°C 856 135
0.1 mM C , 100 mM NaCl, 50°C 52 3.1
0.1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 50°C 2.6 2.1
5 mM C , 65°C 14 1.5

* were obtained considering an and using (3) (Materials and Methods). Enzymes were dissolved in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Values are triplicate determinations in two separate experiments   SD.

The three-dimensional structure of AprE has not been determined but it has been reported for subtilisin BPN' [21]. In fact, as noted above both proteins share 86% identity; therefore their three-dimensional structures are likely to be similar. Thus, the structural analysis using subtilisin BPN' as a model [21] revealed that the mutation Thr66Met was found to be in close contact with the active site of the enzyme, in particular interacting with His64 which acts as a general-base catalyst to activate the -OH group of the nucleophile Ser221. On the other hand, the mutation Gly102Asp was found to occur in the substrate binding subsite S4 of AprE (Figure 4).

The bulky and nonpolar functional side group of Met suggests that the microenvironment in the active site of the AprEL75–L82 mutant was disturbed as a consequence of a polarity change. This alteration may impair the nonpolar residues present in the substrate s-AAPF-pNa (i.e., Phe) that enter in contact with the catalytic residues. Thus, substitution of Thr66Met possibly had a positive effect in reestablishing the core environment (polarity) in the active site of AprEL75–L82. Mutations directed to this region might be useful in identifying amino acid substitutions that reestablish the full activity to AprEL75–L82. On the other hand, it has been reported that substitutions of the residues Gly102Phe and Ser128Phe in savinase, a subtilisin ortholog, blocked the entrance of aromatic residues into the active site pocket, eliminating thus the preference for these residues [25]. Therefore, the introduction of a polar and bulky residue like Asp in position 102 of AprEL75–L82 may anticipate an important structural change in the affinity for the substrate.

Overall, the results of the structural and biochemical analysis of the wild-type, AprEL75–L82 and AprEL75–L82 T66M G102D proteins, strongly suggest that the local perturbation induced by deletion of the loop L75–L82 were partially compensated by the substitutions T66M G102D which are located in close vicinity with the catalytic triad of AprE. Therefore, the results described in this work strongly support the idea that in addition to function as a C binding domain, the loopL75–L82 has an important structural role in the enzyme activity of AprE.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants 43644 and 84482 from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) of México to Mario Pedraza-Reyes. Eliel R. Romero-García and María F. Trujillo were supported by fellowships from CONACYT. We wish to thank Ronald E. Yasbin for critical review of this manuscript and to Sivia J. Mellado for excellent technical assistance.

References

  1. Y. Yang, L. Jiang, L. Zhu, Y. Wu, and S. Yang, “Thermal stable and oxidation-resistant variant of subtilisin E,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 81, no. 2-3, pp. 113–118, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Zhao and F. H. Arnold, “Directed evolution converts subtilisin E into a functional equivalent of thermitase,” Protein Engineering, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. N. Bryan, “Protein engineering of subtilisin,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1543, no. 2, pp. 203–222, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. L. Strausberg, P. A. Alexander, D. T. Gallagher, G. L. Gilliland, B. L. Barnett, and P. N. Bryan, “Directed evolution of a subtilisin with calcium-independent stability,” Biotechnology, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 669–673, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. C. Jain, U. Shinde, Y. Li, M. Inouye, and H. M. Berman, “The crystal structure of an autoprocessed Ser221Cys-subtilisin E-propeptide complex at 2.0 A resolution,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 284, no. 1, pp. 137–144, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. R. Romero-Garcia, J. A. Esquivel-Naranjo, N. Ramirez-Ramirez, J. Garcia-Soto, and M. Pedraza-Reyes, “A single Ser85Ala mutation enhances the catalytic efficiency of subtilisin E from Bacillus subtilis 168,” Biotechnology, vol. 3, pp. 49–55, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Kano, S. Taguchi, and H. Momose, “Cold adaptation of a mesophilic serine protease, subtilisin, by in vitro random mutagenesis,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. A. Alexander, B. Ruan, and P. N. Bryan, “Cation-dependent stability of subtilisin,” Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 35, pp. 10634–10639, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. H. Miller, Experiments in Molecular Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1972.
  10. R. J. Boylan, N. H. Mendelson, D. Brooks, and F. E. Young, “Regulation of the bacterial cell wall: analysis of a mutant of Bacillus subtilis defective in biosynthesis of teichoic acid,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 281–290, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. Sambrook, E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1989.
  12. U. Schön and W. Schumann, “Construction of His6-tagging vectors allowing single-step purification of GroES and other polypeptides produced in Bacillus subtilis,” Gene, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 91–94, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. Kunst, N. Ogasawara, I. Moszer et al., “The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis,” Nature, vol. 390, no. 6657, pp. 249–256, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. L. Stahl and E. Ferrari, “Replacement of the Bacillus subtilis subtilisin structural gene with an in vitro-derived deletion mutation,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 411–418, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. G. Sampedro, P. Cortes, R. A. Muñoz-Clares, A. Fernández, and S. Uribe, “Thermal inactivation of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase from Kluyveromyces lactis. Protection by trehalose,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1544, no. 1-2, pp. 64–73, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Gallagher, P. Bryan, and G. L. Gilliland, “Calcium-independent subtilisin by design,” Proteins, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 205–213, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. O. Almog, T. Gallagher, M. Tordova, J. Hoskins, P. Bryan, and G. L. Gilliland, “Crystal structure of calcium-independent subtilisin BPN' with restored thermal stability folded without the prodomain,” Proteins, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. R. Lacowicz, “Fluorophores,” in Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, J. R. Lacowicz, Ed., pp. 63–93, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  19. G. S. Lakshmikanth and G. Krishnamoorthy, “Solvent-exposed trytophans probe the dynamics at protein surfaces,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 1100–1106, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  20. F. S. Markland Jr. and E. L. Smith, “Subtilisins: Primary Structure, Chemical and Physical Properties,” in The Enzymes, P. D. Boyer, Ed., pp. 561–608, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
  21. T. Gallagher, J. Oliver, R. Bott, C. Betzel, and G. L. Gilliland, “Subtilisin BPN' at 1.6 A resolution: analysis for discrete disorder and comparison of crystal forms,” Acta Crystallographica Section D, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1125–1135, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  22. M. Shopova and N. Genov, “Protonated form of histidine 238 quenches the fluorescence of tryptophan 241 in subtilisin Novo,” International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 475–478, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  23. R. D. Kidd, H. P. Yennawar, P. Sears, C.-H. Wong, and G. K. Farber, “A weak calcium binding site in subtilisin BPN' has a dramatic effect on protein stability,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 1645–1650, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  24. P. A. Alexander, B. Ruan, S. L. Strausberg, and P. N. Bryan, “Stabilizing mutations and calcium-dependent stability of subtilisin,” Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 35, pp. 10640–10644, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. M. Bech, S. B. Sørensen, and K. Breddam, “Significance of hydrophobic S4-P4 interactions in subtilisin 309 from Bacillus lentus,” Biochemistry, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2845–2852, 1993. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2009 Eliel R. Romero-García et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

816 Views | 449 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.