Clinical Study | Open Access
Eduardo Guaní-Guerra, Ulises Noel García-Ramírez, Ana Isabel Jiménez-Romero, José Manuel Velázquez-Ávalos, Gabriela Gallardo-Martínez, Francisco-Javier Mendoza-Espinoza, "Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases at Reference and High-Specialty Hospitals in the State of Guanajuato, Mexico", BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 187254, 6 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/187254
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases at Reference and High-Specialty Hospitals in the State of Guanajuato, Mexico
Background. In general, primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) are underdiagnosed in most countries. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency and clinical spectrum of PID in the most important tertiary hospitals in our region. Methods. An observational, cross-sectional, with retrospective chart, review study was conducted. A total of 26 patients were included and grouped according to the updated classification of PIDs. Results. PIDs spectra were as follows: predominantly antibody deficiency diseases were the most common category (65.38%), followed by other well-defined immunodeficiency syndromes (11.55%), congenital defects of phagocyte number and/or function (7.69%), complement deficiencies (3.85%), combined T- and B-cell immunodeficiencies (3.85%), and defects in innate immunity (3.85%). The mean time elapsed from the onset of symptoms to the reference and diagnosis by a tertiary hospital was of 4.65 ± 6.95 years. Conclusions. Predominant antibody deficiency disease was the most common group of PIDs, agreeing with international reports. Awareness of underdiagnosis by physicians is crucial for a prompt diagnosis and treatment, which in turn should improve the quality of life among patients with PIDs.
Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) are a group of diseases caused by inherited defects of the immune system, in which the common hallmark is the susceptibility to infection. Nowadays, more than 180 different PIDs have been described [1, 2].
However, research on PIDs has not been easy and still faces an array of difficulties. These are due in part to the fact that PIDs were discovered only half a century ago and are still a somewhat new area for common medicine. In some countries, such as Bulgaria, PIDs are even not acknowledged as disease entities and therefore cannot be diagnosed and treated accordingly . Other challenges regarding PIDs include the broad range of diseases caused by a large variety of genetic defects, clinical variations in presentation, complexity of laboratory and genetic assessment, and costs of therapy .
While once thought to be exceedingly rare, symptomatic primary immunodeficiencies are now appreciated to range from 1 : 500 to 1 : 500,000 in the general population in the United States and Europe [5, 6]. A random digit dialing telephone survey in 2007 estimated that one in 1200 people within the United States are diagnosed with an immunodeficiency . If one were to view immunodeficiency disorders as genetic in etiology, this statistic would rank PIDs as more common in the United States than some better-known genetic disorders, such as hemophilia (less than 15,000), cystic fibrosis (30,000), and Huntington disease (30,000) .
Unfortunately, in Mexico, we lack studies that show the prevalence, incidence, and burden cost of PIDs in our population. The objective of the present study is to collect and analyze data on patients with PID in the state of Guanajuato in Mexico, to facilitate diagnosis, treatment, research, and education of such patients, as the first step to improve their quality of life.
2. Materials and Methods
An observational, cross-sectional, with retrospective chart review study was conducted in four different reference centers or tertiary referral hospitals in the state of Guanajuato, Mexico. A total of 26 patients were included and grouped according to the updated classification of PIDs introduced by the Expert Committee of International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) on Primary Immunodeficiency . The study subjects included in the present survey were patients from the immunology department of the different reference centers. At the moment of the study the total amount of patients in the four reference centers was estimated to be 344,672 people. The four high-specialty hospitals have a mean of 86,168 active patients; 147 hospital beds; 9,126 admissions per year; and 9,004 outpatients per year. The patients’ parents were considered to be related if parental consanguinity was of the first or second degree. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and the institutional review board on clinical investigation. Quantitative variables were described using mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical data using absolute and relative frequencies. Statistical analysis was performed using the Sigmaplot v.11.0 software for Windows.
As mentioned before, the sample included 26 patients, 11 females (42.3%) and 15 males (57.7%). The male-to-female ratio was 1.36 : 1. The mean age at the moment of the study was years (). At the moment of diagnosis, 25 patients (96.15%) were under the age of 16 years, and the mean age reported at that time was years. Among the 23 living patients, 20 (86.96%) were aged 15 years or younger and 3 (13.04%) patients were aged 16 years or older. The mean time which elapsed from the onset of symptoms to the reference and diagnosis into a tertiary hospital was of years. The overall mortality rate was 11.54% (). In 10 patients (43.48%) complications secondary to the PID were detected. Among these, bronchiectasis and chronic lung disease secondary to recurrent lung infections were the most common (, 80%). See Table 1 for general characteristics of studied patients.
PID spectra were as follows: predominantly antibody deficiency diseases (65.37%), well-defined immunodeficiency syndromes (11.55%), congenital defects of phagocyte number and/or function (7.69%), complement deficiencies (3.85%), combined immunodeficiencies (3.85%), and defects in innate immunity (3.85%). The well-defined syndromes are a group of diseases in which the occurrence of signs and symptoms point towards PID in patients with syndromic features. Examples of such diseases are the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS), ataxia-telangiectasia, and DiGeorge anomaly . Among the predominantly antibody deficiency diseases, the most frequent were the common variable immunodeficiency disorders (8/17, 47%), followed by X-linked agammaglobulinemia (3/17, 17.6%), selective IgA deficiency (2/17, 11.8%), isolated IgG subclass deficiency (2/17, 11.8%), and transient hypogammaglobulinemia of infancy with normal numbers of B cells (2/17, 11.8%); see Tables 2 and 3 for the PID spectra, clinical characteristics of studied patients, and etiological agents. The IgG levels in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders and X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) at the moment of diagnosis were mg/dL and mg/dL, respectively. The mean serum levels after intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) or trough serum levels were mg/dL for XLA and mg/dL for common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID) patients. The interval of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration among the different hospitals and reference centers ranged from 3 to 4 weeks, and dosing of IVIG varied from 500 mg/dL to 700 mg/dL. All patients with CVID () and XLA () were under IVIG replacement therapy. First-degree parental consanguinity was observed only in one case. No family history of primary immunodeficiency disease was reported.
|PID: primary immunodeficiency diseases; CVID: common variable immunodeficiency disorders; THI: transient hypogammaglobulinemia of infancy.|
|CVID: common variable immunodeficiency disorders; GERD: gastroesophageal reflux disease; IAC: interauricular communication; THI: transient hypogammaglobulinemia of infancy; URTI: upper respiratory tract infections; UTI: urinary tract infection.|
Regarding the 10 warning signs proposed by the Jeffrey Modell Foundation for the suspicion of PID, the most frequent were need for intravenous antibiotics to clear infections (19/26 = 73.08%), two or more pneumonias within 1 year (14/26 = 53.85%), and failure of an infant to gain weight or grow normally (12/26 = 46.15%). See Table 4 for the frequency of the 10 warning signs proposed by the Jeffrey Modell Foundation in the studied patients.
Patients with PID in the present study had similar, as well as different, characteristics, compared to those reported previously in other countries. We found that the proportion of male and female is similar to that reported in national surveys in the USA, Australia, and Europe, with PID being more frequent in males [3, 7, 9]. The diagnostic delay reported in the population of the state of Guanajuato was shorter than that reported in a recent study in Mexico City  for patients with CVID (4.65 versus 12.5 years) and almost the same as that observed in a study of Iranian patients with CVID (4.65 versus 4.4 years) . However, in a survey conducted in Republic of Korea, the time elapsed between the onset of clinical symptoms and PID diagnosis was only of 19 months . We should try to decrease the time of delay in diagnosis, since this could diminish the number of complications attributed to PID. In fact, data show that the proportions of Iranian patients with CVID  and those in our study with bronchiectasis and chronic lung disease were of 30.4% and 30.76%, respectively. In contrast, such complications were considerably less frequent in the Korean population with PID (11.5%) , perhaps due to the lower delay in diagnosis as commented before. Mortality rate in the present study was similar to that reported in the national registry of PID in Korea (11.54 versus 9.8%) . Looking at the bright side, only one patient (3.85%) was diagnosed after 16 years of age in the present survey, whereas the European internet-based patient and research database for PID shows that more than 21% of all registered patients were diagnosed at 16 years of age or later .
The spectrum of PID in the state of Guanajuato is similar to that observed in other studies. Antibody deficiency was seen in 65% of the patients, which is consistent with international reports of several research groups. For example, the proportion of patients with antibody deficiency in Europe is 54.82%, in Australia is 77%, in Korea is 53.3%, in Japan is 52.9%, and in Switzerland is 66.2% [3, 9, 12–14]. The second and third places in our study were occupied by the well-defined immunodeficiency syndromes and the congenital defects of phagocyte number and/or function, respectively; these findings are consistent with data reported in the European and Australian surveys [3, 9].
In the present study, all patients with CVID and XLA were under IRT. This proportion is higher than that reported in other studies. The 2007-USA national survey revealed that the proportions of patients under IRT with XLA were 67% and 13% in patients with CVID . In Australia and New Zealand, the percentages of patients under IRT with XLA and CVID are of 88.9% and 58.6%, respectively . The highest rates of IRT were reported in the 2006–2008 European database for PID, with a coverage of 92% for XLA and 85% for CVID . The trough serum level, which is measured immediately before IgG is administered, should be at least 500 mg/dL and ideally within the normal range of healthy individuals (700–1600 mg/dL) [3, 15]. In fact, one study indicates that the rate of infection can be further reduced with a trough level of 900 mg/dL [16, 17]. The means IgG trough level in the ESID database were 685 mg/dL for CVID patients and 700 mg/dL for XLA patients . In our study, the IgG trough levels were 1434.13 mg/dL for CVID and 1115.5 mg/dL for XLA patients. As all patients with XLA and CVID were under IRT and the trough levels of IgG were above the recommended by international guidelines, we can assume that the different institutions and their physicians are doing a good effort to improve the quality of life among their patients.
The overall consanguinity rate (3.85%) in the present study was very low, compared with that reported in other studies. In one study of Iranian patients with CIVD, a family history of immunodeficiency was recorded and first-degree parental consanguinity was observed in 72.4% . The low consanguinity rate among patients with PID, reported in our study, might suggest specific genetic characteristics of patients with PID in the Mexican population. This fact is supported by the finding that no family history of PID among relatives of our patients was reported. In contrast, 23% of the patients in the national registry of PID in Republic of Korea had one or more family members with proven or suspected immunodeficiency .
In the present study we found that, until diagnosis, patients had a mean of 12.5 visits to the emergency room, 16.1 doctor’s visits/year per patient, and 6.35 hospitalizations related to PID. Unfortunately, a late diagnosis may increase the number of visits to the emergency room, doctor’s visits, hospitalizations, severe infections, and permanent sequelae in patients with PID. This situation has been described in other studies; for example, in the first national survey in the USA, most patients experienced two or more hospitalizations before diagnosis . As we can see, in addition to the deleterious effect on health, there is considerable economic and psychosocial morbidity associated with these disorders. Fortunately, it has been shown that effective treatment can reduce significantly the burden of disease .
There is still much to be done in Mexico and our state. We need to know the real prevalence of PID in Mexico, and increase the level of suspicion among physicians to diminish the time of diagnosis delay, in order to improve the quality of life among patients with PID and their relatives.
- R. S. Geha, L. D. Notarangelo, J.-L. Casanova et al., “Primary immunodeficiency diseases: an update from the International Union of Immunological Societies Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases Classification Committee,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 776–794, 2007.
- H. Chapel, “Classification of primary immunodeficiency diseases by the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) Expert Committee on Primary Immunodeficiency 2011,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 58–59, 2012.
- B. Gathmann, B. Grimbacher, J. Beauté et al., “The European internet-based patient and research database for primary immunodeficiencies: results 2006–2008,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2009.
- M. L. Lindegren, L. Kobrynski, S. A. Rasmussen et al., “Applying public health strategies to primary immunodeficiency diseases: a potential approach to genetic disorders,” MMWR. Recommendations and Reports, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2004.
- E. de Vries, “Patient-centred screening for primary immunodeficiency: a multi-stage diagnostic protocol designed for non-immunologists,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 204–214, 2006.
- M. S. Lim and K. S. J. Elenitoba-Johnson, “The molecular pathology of primary immunodeficiencies,” Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 59–83, 2004.
- J. M. Boyle and R. H. Buckley, “Population prevalence of diagnosed primary immunodeficiency diseases in the United States,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 497–502, 2007.
- C. Dinakar, “Alleviating disease burden in primary immunodeficiency diseases,” Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 260–262, 2006.
- P. Kirkpatrick and S. Riminton, “Primary immunodeficiency diseases in Australia and New Zealand,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 517–524, 2007.
- N. Ramirez-Vargas, S. E. Arablin-Oropeza, D. Mojica-Martinez et al., “Clinical and immunological features of common variable immunodeficiency in Mexican patients,” Allergologia et Immunopathologia, 2013.
- P. Mohammadinejad, A. Aghamohammadi, H. Abolhassani et al., “Pediatric patients with common variable immunodeficiency: long-term follow-up,” Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology, vol. 22, pp. 208–214, 2012.
- J. W. Rhim, K. H. Kim, D. S. Kim et al., “Prevalence of primary immunodeficiency in Korea,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 27, pp. 788–793, 2012.
- H. Hayakawa, T. Iwata, J. Yata, and N. Kobayashi, “Primary immunodeficiency syndrome in Japan. I. Overview of a nationwide survey on primary immunodeficiency syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 1981.
- P. Affentranger, A. Morell, P. Spath, and R. Seger, “Registry of primary immunodeficiencies in Switzerland,” Immunodeficiency, vol. 4, no. 1-4, pp. 193–195, 1993.
- M. C. Sneller, W. Strober, E. Eisenstein, J. S. Jaffe, and C. Cunningham-Rundles, “New insights into common variable immunodeficiency,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 720–730, 1993.
- C. M. Roifman, H. Schroeder, M. Berger et al., “Comparison of the efficacy of IGIV-C, 10% (caprylate/chromatography) and IGIV-SD, 10% as replacement therapy in primary immune deficiency: a randomized double-blind trial,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1325–1333, 2003.
- M. M. Eibl, “History of immunoglobulin replacement,” Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 737–764, 2008.
Copyright © 2013 Eduardo Guaní-Guerra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.