BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Microbial Diversity for Biotechnology

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 248078 | 13 pages |

Potential for Plant Growth Promotion of Rhizobacteria Associated with Salicornia Growing in Tunisian Hypersaline Soils

Academic Editor: George Tsiamis
Received15 Mar 2013
Revised30 Apr 2013
Accepted03 May 2013
Published28 May 2013


Soil salinity and drought are among the environmental stresses that most severely affect plant growth and production around the world. In this study the rhizospheres of Salicornia plants and bulk soils were collected from Sebkhet and Chott hypersaline ecosystems in Tunisia. Depiction of bacterial microbiome composition by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis unveiled the occurrence of a high bacterial diversity associated with Salicornia root system. A large collection of 475 halophilic and halotolerant bacteria was established from Salicornia rhizosphere and the surrounding bulk soil, and the bacteria were characterized for the resistance to temperature, osmotic and saline stresses, and plant growth promotion (PGP) features. Twenty Halomonas strains showed resistance to a wide set of abiotic stresses and were able to perform different PGP activities in vitro at 5% NaCl, including ammonia and indole-3-acetic acid production, phosphate solubilisation, and potential nitrogen fixation. By using a gfp-labelled strain it was possible to demonstrate that Halomonas is capable of successfully colonising Salicornia roots in the laboratory conditions. Our results indicated that the culturable halophilic/halotolerant bacteria inhabiting salty and arid ecosystems have a potential to contribute to promoting plant growth under the harsh salinity and drought conditions. These halophilic/halotolerant strains could be exploited in biofertilizer formulates to sustain crop production in degraded and arid lands.

1. Introduction

The influence of microbes on plant fitness has been recognized both in conventional and extreme habitats, where the ability of rhizobacteria to facilitate plant adaptation and promote growth and productivity has been reported [16]. Root-associated bacteria can promote plant growth by direct and indirect mechanisms, the former including nutrient fixation and solubilisation and phytohormones synthesis. Indirect activities include biocontrol, the ability to reduce or avoid the harmful effects of phytopathogens. Both the host plant and its associated microbiome gain an evolutionary advantage to survive under harsh conditions by establishing tight interplays.

Among abiotic stresses soil salinity is one of the strongest factors affecting plant growth and yield [7]. Conditions of high salt concentrations in the soil are very frequent in arid and semiarid regions on Earth, where different halophytic species can be found. Halophytes have been proposed as key players for saline soils reclamation [8], phytoremediation of hydrocarbon and heavy metals polluted saline soils [9, 10], and forage and oil seed production [11, 12]. Salicornia (Chenopodiaceae) is a subcosmopolitan plant genus comprising annual species strictly occurring in salty environments and widespread in several countries, including those of the Mediterranean basin. Salicornia densely colonises different areas of southern Tunisia, including Sebkhet and Chott ecosystems, dominated by extreme values of aridity and soil salinity. Intense evaporation rates render Sebkhet and Chott as dry salt lakes which are inhospitable for most of the organisms.

The manipulation of natural resources to increase plant productivity in lands traditionally considered unsuitable for agriculture is a challenging but necessary task, in the light of the increasing world population and the need for food production [13]. The efforts which aimed to the production of salt-resistant crops include conventional breeding, marker-assisted selection, and the creation of transgenic plants and are nowadays focusing also on the halophyte potential to guarantee a suitable food production in a salinized planet [14]. Different works in the last years highlighted the importance of plant growth promoting bacteria in facilitating salt tolerance in plants devoted to food production [3, 7, 15, 16], and few reports emphasized the role of PGP bacteria associated with Salicornia spp. [1722]. The investigation of the rhizobacterial community associated to plants naturally adapted to cope with extreme saline conditions might lead to several knowledge outputs: (i) the understanding of the plant-microbe interaction under saline conditions, (ii) definition of the mechanisms underlying plant growth with promotion under the salinity stress, and (iii) identification of bacterial strains to design biological fertilizers exploitable for agriculture in arid and saline lands. To achieve the best results in terms of plant growth promotion under salinity and drought stress it is essential to focus on the fraction of the culturable bacteria that is able to thrive under these specific conditions. Therefore, the aims of this work were (i) the isolation of halophilic/halotolerant bacteria from Salicornia rhizosphere and bulk soils collected in hypersaline ecosystems in southern Tunisia, (ii) the characterization of their resistance to abiotic stresses and their plant growth promoting (PGP) potential, and (iii) the description of taxonomic diversity of both the halophilic/halotolerant culturable fraction and the whole bacterial microbiome inhabiting Salicornia rhizosphere and bulk soils.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description, Soil Sampling, and Soil Characterization

The studied sites, named BDV4 (N 34°26′951′′; E 09°54′102′′), BDV11 (N 34°08′735′′; E 08°04′417′′), and BDV20 (N 33°57′252′′; E 08°24′508′′) corresponded, respectively, to Sebkhet El Naouel, Chott El Gharsa, and Chott El Jerid and were located in southern Tunisia.

Visual inspection of the sites identified Salicornia as the only present plant. The plants were identified according to the plant morphology as S. strobilacea [23, 24], a widespread plant in southern Tunisia.

Between the sites different conditions in respect of superficial salt crust presence (BDV11) or absence (BDV20) were observed (Table 1). Rhizospheric and bulk soils were sampled from triplicate specimens of Salicornia from sites BDV11 and BDV20. In the site BDV4 different microenvironments were identified, and a total of six Salicornia specimens were collected. In this site three sampled specimens were growing on salt crust covered soil (BDV4-S1, BDV4-S2, and BDV4-S3), and three sampled specimens were growing on a soil plot where salt crusts were absent (BDV4-S4, BDV4-S5, and BDV4-S6). Replicates of bulk soils were also sampled from the site BDV4 (presence of salt crust: BDV4-B1; absence of salt crust: BDV4-B4). Rhizospheric soil was defined as soil particles tightly adhering to roots (1–3 mm) after gently shaking. Bulk soil was collected as control about 2 m far from any vegetation. Rhizosphere and bulk soils will be, respectively, indicated in the text with the codes S and B. Soil samples were collected using sterile spoons and stored in sterile bags at −20°C for molecular analyses and at 4°C for microbiological isolation. Soil salinity was measured with a hand refractometer (Atago, Tokyo, Japan) after the extraction of pore water from approximately 2 g of soil.

Sample codeSoil fractionSiteCoordinatesFeature

BDV4-S1,2,3RhizosphereSebkhet en NaouelN 34°26′951′′, E 09°54′102′′soil covered by salt crust
BDV4-S4,5,6RhizosphereSebkhet en NaouelN 34°26′951′′, E 09°54′102′′soil
BDV11-S1,2,3RhizosphereChott El GharsaN 34°08′735′′, E 08°04′417′′soil covered by salt crust
( % of salinity)
BDV20-S1,2,3RhizosphereChott El JeridN 33°57′252′′, E 08°24′508′′soil
BDV4-B1-1,2,3Bulk soilSebkhet en NaouelN 34°26′951′′, E 09°54′102′′soil covered by salt crust
BDV4-B4-1,2,3Bulk soilSebkhet en NaouelN 34°26′951′′, E 09°54′102′′soil
BDV11-B1,2,3Bulk soilChott El GharsaN 34°08′735′′, E 08°04′417′′soil covered by salt crust
( % of salinity)
BDV20-B1,2,3Bulk soilChott El JeridN 33°57′252′′, E 08°24′508′′soil

2.2. Metagenome Extraction and 16S rRNA Amplification

DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of soil using the protocol established by Schbereiter-Gurtner et al. [25].

DNA was quantified using NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments (~550 bp) were PCR amplified using primers 907R (3′-CCGTCAATTCCTTTGAGTTT-5′) and GC-357F (3′-CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-5′ with a 5′-end GC-clamp) targeting a portion of the 16S rRNA gene that include the hypervariable V3 regions [26]. PCR reactions were performed in a 50 μL final volume containing 1X buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 5% of DMSO, 0.12 mM of dNTPs mixture, 0.3 μM of each primer, 1.5 U Taq polymerase, and 10 ng of template, applying the following thermic protocol: 94°C for 4 min, followed by 10 cycles of 94°C for 0.5 min, 61°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; followed by further 20 cycles of 94°C for 0.5 min, 56°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Presence and length of PCR products were verified by electrophoresis in 1% w/v agarose gel prior to Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis.

2.3. Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis

PCR products (~150 ng) were loaded in a 0.5 mm polyacrylamide gel (7% (w/v) acrylamide-bisacrylamide, 37.5 : 1) containing 40 to 60% urea-formamide denaturing gradient (100% corresponds to 7 M urea and 40% (vol/vol) formamide) according to the method described by Muyzer et al. [26]. The gels were run for 15 h at 60°C by applying a constant voltage of 90 V in 1X Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer. After electrophoresis, the gels were stained for 30 min in 1X TAE buffer containing 1X SYBR Green (Molecular Probes, Leiden, the Netherlands) according to manufacturer’s instructions and rinsed twice for 10 min with distilled water. Gels images were captured using a Gel Doc 2000 apparatus (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy). The band patterns of DGGE gels were analysed using Image J software (available for free download at and Microsoft Excel XLSTAT software (Addinsoft Inc., New York, NY, USA) as previously described [5]. DGGE bands were excided from the gels with a sterile scalpel and eluted in 50 μL of sterile Milli-Q water at 37°C for 4 hours. Subsequently, 8 μL of eluted DNA was reamplified by PCR using primers 357F and 907R as described in the previous paragraph. Positive amplifications were partially sequenced by Macrogen Inc., Korea ( using the primer 357F.

2.4. Bacteria Isolation

Rhizospheric and bulk soil triplicates were pooled prior to bacteria isolation, except in the case of the specimens BDV4-S4, BDV4-S5, and BDV4-S6, collected at site BDV4 in absence of surface salt crust, and processed separately. Thus, we compared the structure of culturable halotolerant/halophilic bacteria among the different study sites, and additionally the taxonomic diversity within the same site was evaluated by comparing the replicates. To determine the bacterial cell number, 1 g of rhizospheric and bulk soils collected at the different sites was shaken with 9 mL of sterile saline solution (0.9% NaCl). The suspensions were serially diluted and plated in triplicate on solidified R2A medium (Oxoid) enriched with 10 and 15% NaCl. After 1-week incubation at 30°C, the colony-forming unit (cfu) per gram was determined, and, for each sample, a number of colonies comprised between 8 and 42 per medium were randomly selected. The bacterial isolates were stored as 25% glycerol stocks at −80°C.

2.5. Genotypic Characterization and Identification

DNA extraction was performed on each isolated strain. The bacteria collection has been dereplicated through the application of 16S-23S rRNA Intergenic Transcribed Spacer-PCR (ITS-PCR) using ITS-F (3′-GTCGTAACAAGGTAGCCGTA-5′) and ITS-R (3′-CTACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA-5′) primers as previously described [5, 27]. PCR amplification was performed in 25 μL reaction containing 1X buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.12 mM of dNTPs mixture, 0.3 μM of each primer, 1 U Taq polymerase, and 10 ng of template, applying the following thermic protocol: 94°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 0.5 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The ITS-PCR products were run on 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. Gel images were captured using a Gel Doc 2000 apparatus (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy) and ITS-fingerprinting profiles were visually analysed to cluster together the bacterial isolates showing the same band pattern. From each cluster, at least a representative strain has been selected for subsequent PGP characterization and genotypic identification through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. 16S rRNA amplification was performed by using the universal primers 27F (3′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-5′) and 1492R (3′-CTACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA-5′) [28] and applying the same protocol of ITS-PCR. Partial 16S rRNA sequences were obtained from Macrogen Inc., Korea (

2.6. Nucleotide Sequence Analyses and Accession Numbers

Nucleotide sequences were edited in Chromas Lite 2.01 ( and subjected to BLAST search ( The partial 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from the bacterial isolates and the excised DGGE bands have been deposited in the EMBL, respectively, under accession numbers HF678717–HF678862 and HF678127–HF678194.

2.7. Resistance to Abiotic Stresses

Resistance to salt stress was assessed by growing the isolates at 30°C in R2A supplemented by different sodium chloride concentrations, ranging from 0 to 20% w/v. The ability to grow under osmotic stress was tested at 30°C by adding 5–20% of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to R2A broth medium. Finally, the capability to growth in a wide range of temperatures was verified by incubating the R2A plates at 4°, 42°, and 50°C. A control, consisting in a sterile plate or tube, was also run parallel to each experiment.

2.8. In Vitro Screening of Plant Growth Promoting Activities

Each isolate was grown as pure culture to evaluate its PGP features in suitable media enriched with 5% w/v NaCl. Only two isolates were not able to grow at 5% NaCl, and their PGP activities were tested at 10% NaCl. The production of indole-3-acetic acid was detected by the method described by Bric et al. [29]. The ability to solubilise insoluble phosphate compounds was estimated according to Ahmad et al. [30]. The ammonia synthesis assay was performed as recommended by Cappuccino and Sherman [31]. Protease activity was determined from clearing zones in skimmed milk agar according to Nielsen and Sørensen [32]. Atmospheric nitrogen fixation ability and ACC-deaminase activity were determined by the method of Penrose and Glick [33]. nifH gene detection has been performed by PCR test using the primer sets PolF (3′-TGCGAYCCSAARGCBGACTC-5′) and PolR (3′-ATSGCCATCATYTCRCCGGA-5′) [34]. PCR amplification was performed in 25 μL reaction containing 1X buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.12 mM of dNTPs mixture, 0.3 μM of each primer, 1 U Taq polymerase, and 10 ng of template, applying the following thermic protocol: 94°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 0.5 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.

2.9. Chromosomal gfp-Tagging of Halotolerant Halomonas Strains by Conjugation Procedure

To stably transform strains affiliated to the genus Halomonas, we adopted the method based on mini-Tn7 transposon system [35]. Briefly, the mobilisation of the gfp-harbouring fragment was achieved by a four-parental conjugation formed by a cellular suspension of 1010 cells of the strain to be transformed and 109 cells for E. coli strains carrying helper, delivery, and mobilization plasmids [35]. To select for gfp-transformed cells, after the mating, the cellular suspension was plated in R2A medium supplemented with 10% NaCl and the required antibiotics. The gfp-labelling procedure was successful for a strain of H. elongata, as visualized by fluorescence microscopy.

2.10. In Vitro Bacterial Rhizocompetence Test

To evaluate gfp-labelled strain ability to adhere and potentially colonise plant root system, an in vitro assay was performed on two model plants: Arabidopsis thaliana and Salicornia plantlets collected in marine dune ecosystems in south Italy. After an overnight growth in liquid selective medium, bacterial cell concentration was microscopically evaluated, and a 108 cell/mL suspension was prepared. Salicornia plant roots were dipped in MS salt half strength medium (SIGMA, Italy) supplemented with 2% NaCl and the prepared bacterial suspension. For Arabidopsis rhizocompetence test, NaCl addition was avoided since this plant is extremely salt stress-sensitive. After an overnight incubation (~16 h), plant roots were gently washed to remove no- or weakly-bound bacterial cells and observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCSNT). Images were acquired using Leica Confocal Software and analysed by using the MBF ImageJ software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. DGGE Analysis of the Bacterial Microbiome Inhabiting Salicornia Rhizosphere and Surrounding Bulk Soil

The introduction of fingerprint-based analyses [26, 36, 37] turned into the application of cultivation-independent techniques as routine tools to depict the overall microbiome composition in environmental samples and to infer which factors influence the abundance and distribution of specific microbial taxa. Here, DGGE analysis of 16S rRNA gene was applied to provide a snapshot of both culturable and unculturable bacterial assemblages in Salicornia rhizosphere and the surrounding bulk soil not affected by the plant. Bulk soil samples from all sites were analysed in triplicate, except in BDV4-B4 sites where only duplicate samples were analysed due to the failing of PCR-DGGE amplification. Although the bulk soils collected from Tunisian Sebkhet and Chott were characterized by extreme dryness and salinity values, DGGE band profiles highlighted that a rich and diverse bacterial microbiome was present in all the samples (Figure 1(a), left panel). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) performed on the line plots derived from DGGE band profiles (Figure 1(b), left panel) indicated that bulk soils clustered according to the site of provenience. On axis 1, describing the 44% of the samples similarity, bulk soil samples were distributed according to the presence (stations BDV4-B1 and BDV11-B) or absence (stations BDV20-B and BDV4-B4) of salt crusts covering the soil surface. Salinity is known as one of the strongest abiotic factors influencing the assemblages of a huge variety of bacterial populations sheltered by the soil [38]. The factors shaping the composition of the bacterial community include also biotic interactions, and the role of root exudates in the selection of a peculiar microbiome is well known [39]. The DGGE pattern obtained from Salicornia rhizosphere samples was different from those observed in bulk soils (Figure 1(a)). According to DGGE fingerprints the bacterial communities of the rhizospheric soil triplicates collected at both sites BDV20 and BDV11 clustered together (Figure 1(a), right panel). Similarly, the rhizospheres collected from the salt crust covered soil at site BDV4 (BDV4-S1, 2, and 3) showed a high level of homogeneity. A high number of DGGE bands were observed in all the rhizospheres, with the exclusion of BDV4-S6 sample, probably affected by biases in PCR amplification. Overall, the rhizosphere of Salicornia was proved to be a habitat characterized by a highly rich bacterial community. Principal Component Analysis of the DGGE patterns (Figure 1(b), right panel) indicated, except for rhizosphere samples BDV4-S5 and BDV4-S1, a higher similarity among the rhizospheres collected from different stations than among the bulk soils suggesting that the rhizosphere acts as a selection factor that tend to uniform bacterial diversity independent from the soil type. Principal Component Analysis (Figure 1(b), right panel) pointed out the overall similarity of the bacterial communities hosted by the Salicornia rhizospheres collected in different sites. The even structure of the rhizosphere bacterial community confirmed the importance of plant inputs in the selection of specific bacterial taxa associated with the roots, a well-known phenomenon generally reported as “rhizosphere effect.” Despite that, the occurrence of a degree of variability within the bacterial microbiome associated with Salicornia specimens collected in different microenvironments within site BDV4 (related to presence and absence of salt crusts on soil surface) was perceived by DGGE analysis. This result confirmed that, besides the selection driven by the plant, also the environmental parameters play a role in shaping the rhizosphere bacterial microbiome.

According to DGGE band sequencing analyses, the prevalent taxonomic groups associated with Salicornia roots and bulk soils were Alpha-, Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria, Bacilli, and Actinobacteria (Figure 1(c)), as previously observed in the bacterial communities associated to different plant species (Capsicum annuum) growing in desert areas under water stress condition [5]. In addition, two different orders belonging to the Bacteroidetes phylum were retrieved, namely, Sphingobacteriales and Flavobacteriales, the latter exclusively present in the bulk soil (Figure 1(c)). Both in rhizospheric and bulk soils Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli were represented by only one taxonomic order, while Alphaproteobacteria composition differed in the two soil fractions. Alphaproteobacteria in rhizospheric soils were represented exclusively by Rhizobiales spp. while bulk soils were colonised by a more diverse bacterial community including, in addition to Rhizobiales, the orders Sphingomonadales and Rhodobacterales.

3.2. Bacteria Isolation and Identification

Viable halotolerant bacteria were cultured on oligotrophic medium from all the collected rhizospheres and from the bulk soil sampled at BDV11 site. Culturable bacteria abundance (Figure 2) was considerably variable between the different sites, and the number of colony-forming units (cfu) ranged between 9 × 104 and 1.6 × 1010 per gram of fresh soil. Similar counts were observed within the sites on the same medium supplemented with 10% and 15% of sodium chloride. This result indicates that most of the halotolerant culturable bacteria are able to cope with the higher value of salt content, close to the salinity measured in the soil pore water of BDV11 station. Halotolerant bacteria abundance in the BDV11-B bulk soil was in accordance with values previously reported in similar environments [40]. The interaction with the plant and the presence of root exudates could be responsible for the higher abundance of halotolerant/halophilic bacteria detected in the rhizosphere (Figure 2), as compared to the bulk soils in BDV11 site. These results are in agreement with the “rhizosphere effect” described by several authors in conventional and extreme environments [5, 39]. To our knowledge, this work is nevertheless the first report about the quantification of halotolerant microbes in root-associated extremely saline soils, enlarging the concept of the rhizosphere effect to specific bacterial groups highly adapted to the hostile environmental conditions.

A large collection of 475 isolates, representing the halotolerant culturable fraction of the bacterial diversity associated with Salicornia specimens and bulk soil of Sebkhet and Chott ecosystems, was established. In the case of BDV4-S6 only eight colonies growing in a medium containing 15% NaCl were isolated, whilst for the rest of the samples a number of colonies comprising between 22 and 42 were randomly picked for both the salt enrichment conditions. ITS-PCR fingerprinting was applied to dereplicate the bacteria collection allowing the identification of 136 clusters corresponding to different ITS profiles and representing different species/subspecies. From each haplotype at least one strain was arbitrarily selected for 16S rRNA partial gene sequencing and for the phenotypic tests. The taxonomic identification of the bacteria showed the prevalence of the Halomonas genus among the strains isolated at 15% NaCl (Figure 3). Excluding samples BDV4-S5 and BDV4-S6, where bacteria belonging to the genus Nesterenkonia were also retrieved, the strains isolated from both bulk and rhizosphere soils on medium containing 15% NaCl were represented exclusively by Halomonas. Hence, the subcollection obtained on 15% sodium chloride supplemented medium was characterized by high dominance and low values of the Shannon diversity index (Table 2). Similarly, bacteria isolated on 10% NaCl containing medium from BDV11-B and BDV11-S1 belonged exclusively to the Halomonas genus (Figure 3). This genus, together with the genus Chromohalobacter, represented the totality of BDV20-S1 halophilic culturable community (Figure 3). The prevalence of the Halomonas genus was demonstrated within the halotolerant root-associated bacteria collection, where Halomonas elongata, along with the species H. eurihalina, H. sinaiensis, H. halmophila, H. ilicicola, H. indalina, H. variabilis, H. xinjiangensis, and H. taeheungii, where retrieved. The isolation of Halomonas sp. from the roots of Salicornia brachiata was recently reported [19]. Besides harbouring higher salt tolerant bacterial counts, Salicornia rhizosphere was richer than bulk soils also in terms of biodiversity, since all the bacteria isolated from BDV11-B belonged to the specie Halomonas elongata. Overall, the strains isolated at 10% NaCl from rhizosphere soil of site BDV4 displayed a higher biodiversity at the genus level (Figure 3) that is reflected by low dominance values and high values of the Shannon diversity index (Table 2). BDV4 rhizospheric soils, characterized by lower abundance of culturable halotolerant/halophilic bacteria compared to those collected at sites BDV11 and BDV20 (Figure 2), hosted a more diverse halotolerant bacterial community comprising different genera that were previously reported in other hypersaline environments [41]. Strains belonging to the Chromohalobacter genus were isolated at 10% NaCl from BDV4-S6 and BDV20-S1. This genus, along with Halomonas, represents an important member of the family Halomonadaceae, a taxonomic group within the Gammaproteobacteria typical of hypersaline environments, whose taxonomy is still under revision [42]. A third genus, Kushneria, of the family Halomonadaceae was isolated from the BDV4-S4 rhizosphere. The additional root-associated halotolerant bacteria belonged to the classes Bacilli (Halobacillus trueperi, Marinococcus halophilus, Oceanobacillus picturae and Virgibacillus olivae) and Actinobacteria, the latter being represented exclusively by the species Nesterenkonia halobia. Both Oceanobacillus picturae, and Nesterenkonia halobia were previously isolated from a different saline ecosystem, namely, mangrove sediments [43, 44], where O. picturea was described for the first time as a phosphate-solubilising bacterium able to promote mangrove seedling.



Taxonomic analyses on the bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of plants growing in different niches of the same site (BDV4-S4, BDV4-S5, and BDV4-S6) permitted to assess the occurrence of intrasite environmental selective forces shaping the composition of the culturable halophilic community, as it was already shown for the total bacterial community by DGGE-fingerprinting results. Even though the enrichment on 15% NaCl resulted in an even taxonomic distribution of the isolates, a certain degree of variability could be observed in the bacteria isolated at 10% NaCl (Figure 3), suggesting that microvariations within the site may influence the prevalence of different bacterial populations in the culturable halotolerant fraction. This result strengthens the diversity pattern described by DGGE on the total bacterial microbiome inhabiting the Salicornia rhizospheric soils collected at site BDV4 (Figure 1, right panel), indicating a partial overcoming of environmental factors on the rhizosphere effect imposed by the host plant.

3.3. Resistance to Abiotic Stresses

Aiming to identify the most suitable rhizobacteria to design a biofertilizer for sustaining plant growth in saline and arid soils, the ability of the isolated bacteria to cope with different abiotic stresses typical of arid lands was tested on 164 bacterial strains belonging to the 136 ITS groups identified by collection dereplication. In particular the bacteria collection was screened for the capability (i) to grow at extreme temperature values, (ii) to thrive in presence of different salt concentrations and (iii) in conditions of low water availability. The strains able to grow at 42°C represented 93% of the bacteria collection (Figure 4(a)) whereas only 13% of the isolates survived at higher temperature (50°C). The ability to flourish at low temperature (4°C) was observed for 71% of the total isolates, and twenty strains were able to grow in a large temperature interval, between 4 and 50°C. In arid and saline soils the vegetation is generally sparse, a factor that contributes to the strong temperature fluctuations affecting the soil. Hence, the ability of the plant associated microbes to grow in a large temperature range and to survive at temperature fluctuations is useful to efficiently colonise barren and extreme desert habitats.

All the isolates were isolated in the presence of 10 and 15% of sodium chloride in the growing medium. The majority of the isolates, corresponding, respectively, to 99% and 92% of the bacteria collection, grew at lower (5%) or higher (20%) salinity (Figure 4(a)). A significant fraction of the collection (74%) was constituted by halophiles, unable to grow in the absence of NaCl in the medium (Figure 4(a)).

A high percentage (90%) of the isolated bacteria was able to grow in presence of 5% polyethylene Glycol (PEG) (Figure 4(a)), a molecule which induces a decrease of the water potential when added to the cultivation media [45]. A decline in the number of isolates that positively grew at increasing PEG concentration was observed; nevertheless the percentage of bacteria able to grow at 10 and 20% of PEG were noteworthy and corresponded, respectively, to 87 and 81% of the bacteria collection.

Tolerance to abiotic stresses was widespread within the bacteria collection, and represented a common trait even in phylogenetic unrelated strains, as expected since many of the retrieved species were previously isolated from saline and hypersaline habitats as in the case of Virgibacillus spp. [46, 47], Halomonas sinaiensis [48], and Kushneria and Halomonas spp. [49, 50].

In vitro tests showed that twenty Halomonas strains were particularly resistant to extreme values of different abiotic factors. These isolates, belonging to the species H. elongata and H. sinaiensis, were able to actively grow (i) on R2A medium containing a percentage of sodium chloride comprised between 5 and 20%, (ii) in the presence of 5, 10, and 20% of PEG in the medium, and (iii) when incubated in a wide range of temperature (from 4 to 50°C).

The resistance of the isolates to the extreme physical-chemical parameters of Tunisian Sebkhet and Chott ecosystems is a prerequisite to select efficient PGP bacteria able to sustain plant growth since the effectiveness of a microbial consortium strictly depends on its competitive root colonisation [51, 52], a reason that explains why the use of PGP bacteria isolated from different soil and climate conditions can be a largely unsuccessfully strategy in arid and saline lands [53, 54].

3.4. Plant Growth Promotion Test

The PGP activities of 164 isolates, belonging to the 136 ITS-PCR clusters and representing the whole taxonomic diversity of the established bacteria collection, were tested in vitro by using specific media supplemented by 5% sodium chloride.

One of the strategies adopted by PGP bacteria to induce plant growth is the influence on the plant hormonal balance. 96% of the isolates showed the ability to produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (Figure 4(b)), one of the main plant hormones of the auxin family. This trait was shared by all the genera retrieved from the analysed rhizospheric and bulk soils while it was not detected in the isolated Chromohalobacter marismortui and C. salexigens strains. Few strains unable to produce IAA belong to the species Oceanobacillus picturae and Halomonas halophila, characterized by an uneven distribution of this PGP feature within their ITS clusters. The capability to modulate the plant stress level by providing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), a molecule involved in lateral roots development, was previously reported for halotolerant bacteria isolated from coastal soils [55], halophyte roots in Argentina [56], and rhizosphere of C. annum growing in desert areas [5]. In addition, the recent study by Tiwari et al. [16] demonstrated that inoculation of wheat with Halomonas sp., the most abundant genus in our strains collection, resulted in higher content of IAA in the rhizosphere of the treated plants than control experiment.

Rhizobacteria can also positively influence the health status of the host plant by reducing the concentration of stress signaling molecule such as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, a precursor of ethylene. Only three strains out of the collection, belonging to the species Halomonas taeheungii and Halomonas xinjiangensis, displayed ACC-deaminase activity in presence of 5% NaCl (Figure 4(b)). ACC-deaminase activity in the genus Halomonas was recently reported in the ambit of the investigation of PGP features of halophilic bacteria isolated from halophytes, including the species Salicornia brachiata [22, 55]. Nonetheless, the low percentage (2%) of ACC-deaminase activity among the collection established in this work is in agreement with previous studies reporting the detection of ACC-deaminase activity only for a minor fraction of bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of wheat growing in salinized soil [6, 16].

Direct mechanisms of plant growth promotion include those metabolisms that, by supplying nutrients to the plant, enhance its fitness. The established halotolerant/halophile bacteria collection was analysed for the capability to solubilise phosphate, fix nitrogen, and produce ammonia. The phosphate solubilisation activity was present in 65% of the whole collection (Figure 4(b)), including all the genera except for Kushneria. The potential activity of nitrogen fixation has been phenotypically tested by the strain capability to grow in nitrogen-free medium and confirmed by molecular investigation by PCR amplification of the nifH gene, codifying for a subunit of the nitrogenase enzyme. Six percent of the analysed bacterial strains were positive to both the tests showing the putative ability to fix nitrogen (Figure 4(b)). Putative nitrogen fixation activity was detected in only a minor fraction of the ITS clusters, belonging to the species Halomonas elongata, H. eurihalina, H. indalina, Kushneria marisflavi, and Chromohalobacter canadensis. Ammonia production was also a common PGP trait shown by 93% of the isolates (Figure 4(b)). All the bacteria genera present in strain collection were positive to the ammonia production assay, thus potentially contributing to plant nitrogen nutrition. The inability to produce ammonia did not show any species-related pattern. The widespread ability to increase the concentration of bioavailable nutrients in the isolate collection from Salicornia rhizosphere suggested the contribution of these halotolerant and halophilic bacteria to the plant nutrient balance. These direct PGP features were generally simultaneously present in the same strain, possibly acting in a synergic manner to directly promote plant growth, as previously reported [30].

Besides direct PGP activity, several representatives of all the taxonomic classes retrieved in our collection (11%) also displayed in vitro protease activity, a result that indicated their possible role as biocontrol agents. The bacterial isolates displaying protease activity comprised bacterial strains of the genera Chromohalobacter, Halomonas, Kushneria, Marinococcus, Nesterenkonia, and Virgibacillus.

The results about the investigation of the PGP traits occurrence among the bacteria collection established from the Salicornia rhizospheric and bulk soils are in general agreement with the observations reported by other studies realized on halophyte [22, 55, 56] and crop plant growing under saline conditions [5, 6, 15, 16].

3.5. In Vitro Colonisation of Salicornia Root System

Besides performing in vitro activities involved in biostimulation, biocontrol, or biofertilization, to play an effective role in plant growth promotion, a bacterial strain should be able to colonise the plant root system. The potential ability of PGP isolates to efficiently colonise plant root system was tested by performing an adhesion assay exploiting a gfp-tagged PGP bacterium [57]. The adhesion test was performed on a nonhalophyte model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana, already used to study plant-microbe interactions [5, 58, 59], and on a wild Salicornia collected in southern Italy. Different rhizospheric bacterial strains belonging to the Halomonas genus were selected, based on their promising multiple PGP activities in vitro and the ability to cope with several abiotic stresses, as candidate for the chromosomal gfp-tagging. H. elongata strain BDV11S17A was successfully transformed with the gene encoding the Green Fluorescent Protein (gfp) that was stably inserted in the bacterium genome. The gfp-labelled H. elongata BDV11S17A was used to track bacterial adhesion on Arabidopsis and Salicornia roots in vitro by exposing the roots to a gfp-labelled bacterial suspension for 16 hours. The gfp-tagged strain was unable to colonise Arabidopsis root system, and despite several attempts and the analysis of different root specimens, only few cells were observed at the fluorescence microscope. On the contrary, confocal analysis of Salicornia roots showed an extensive colonisation by gfp-labelled strain (Figure 5). H. elongata BDV11S17A-gfp, previously shown to be able to grow under different stresses (high and low temperatures, high saline concentrations, and water stress) and to perform PGP activities in vitro, showed a good rhizocompetence efficiently colonizing Salicornia root surface and root hairs. Such features make the strain a potential candidate for in vivo PGP experiments.

4. Conclusions

DGGE fingerprinting on the total bacterial microbiome colonising the bulk soils showed that the presence/absence of salt crusts on the soil surface was a driving force involved in shaping the structure of the hypersaline soil dwelling bacterial community. The same approach demonstrated that Salicornia selected similar bacterial communities in the rhizosphere, independently from the site of sampling. Notably, rhizosphere associated bacterial communities differed from that colonizing the root-free soil. Overall DGGE fingerprinting indicated that a peculiar bacterial microbiome is stably associated with Salicornia roots, possibly having a role in promoting plant growth and stress tolerance.

The establishment of a large collection of halophilic and halotolerant bacterial strains and their identification widened the knowledge on the rhizocompetent bacterial community associated with halophytes in saline and arid soils. Furthermore, the isolation from the halophilic plant Salicornia of a large collection of bacteria which tolerate temperature, saline, and osmotic stresses and also showed in vitro the ability at medium-high salinity value (5% NaCl) to (i) positively influence the nutrients and hormonal balance and (ii) putatively express biocontrol activity as indicated by the protease activity test is a novelty presented in this study. Furthermore, the gfp-labelled PGP Halomonas elongata strain isolated from rhizospheric soil showed the ability to massively adhere on Salicornia roots in vitro, demonstrating the suitability of halophilic plants rhizobacteria to set up effective PGP inocula. The great potential of PGP halophilic and halotolerant bacteria should be carefully taken into account to satisfy the increased need of food production in the frame of a raising world population and ongoing climate changes. The present work contributes to expand the current knowledge on PGP bacteria, presenting a wide bacterial strain collection that could be exploited to set up specifically designed microbial consortia able to enhance plant growth and productivity in soils impacted by salt and drought stresses.


The authors would like to thank Dr. Umberto Fascio ((CIMA) Centro Interdipartimentale di Microscopia avanzata of the University of Milan) for technical support at the confocal microscope and Raffaella Tassoni for technical support in performing the PGP tests. The authors are grateful to Dr. Lotte Lambertsen for the kind gifts of the E. coli strains for gfp-labelling of the bacteria. This work was financially supported by the European Union in the ambit of Project BIODESERT (European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme CSA-SA REGPOT-2008-2 under Grant agreement no. 245746). F. Mapelli and E. Rolli were supported by Università degli Studi di Milano, DeFENS, European Social Found (FSE) and Regione Lombardia (Contract “Dote Ricerca”). R. Marasco was supported by a fellowship in the ambit of BIOGESTECA Project (n° 15083/RCC “Fondo per la promozione di accordi istituzionali”).


  1. A. Balloi, E. Rolli, R. Marasco et al., “The role of microorganisms in bioremediation and phytoremediation of polluted and stressed soils,” Agrochimica, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 353–369, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  2. L. E. de-Bashan, J. P. Hernandez, Y. Bashan, and R. M. Maier, “Bacillus pumilus ES4: candidate plant growth-promoting bacterium to enhance establishment of plants in mine tailings,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 343–352, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. Egamberdieva, F. Kamilova, S. Validov, L. Gafurova, Z. Kucharova, and B. Lugtenberg, “High incidence of plant growth-stimulating bacteria associated with the rhizosphere of wheat grown on salinated soil in Uzbekistan,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. Hayat, S. Ali, U. Amara, R. Khalid, and I. Ahmed, “Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 579–598, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Marasco, E. Rolli, B. Ettoumi et al., “A drought resistance-promoting microbiome is selected by root system under desert farming,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e48479, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S. K. Upadhyay, D. P. Singh, and R. Saikia, “Genetic diversity of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from rhizospheric soil of wheat under saline condition,” Current Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 489–496, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Mayak, T. Tirosh, and B. R. Glick, “Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 565–572, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. C. Ravindran, K. Venkatesana, V. Balakrishnana, K. P. Chellappana, and T. Balasubramanian, “Restoration of saline land by halophytes for Indian soils,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 39, pp. 2661–2664, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. M. Al-Mailem, N. A. Sorkhoh, M. Marafie, H. Al-Awadhi, M. Eliyas, and S. S. Radwan, “Oil phytoremediation potential of hypersaline coasts of the Arabian Gulf using rhizosphere technology,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 15, pp. 5786–5792, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Manousaki and N. Kalogerakis, “Halophytes present new opportunities in phytoremediation of heavy metals and saline soils,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 656–660, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. P. Glenn, J. W. O'Leary, M. C. Watson, T. L. Thompson, and R. O. Kuehl, “Salicornia bigelovii Torr.: an oilseed halophyte for seawater irrigation,” Science, vol. 251, no. 4997, pp. 1065–1067, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  12. F. M. Attia, A. A. Alsobayel, M. S. Kriadees, M. Y. Al-Saiady, and M. S. Bayoumi, “Nutrient composition and feeding value of Salicornia bigelovii torr meal in broiler diets,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 65, no. 1–4, pp. 257–263, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  13. United Nations Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Global Sustainability, Resilient People, Resilient Planet: A Future Worth Choosing, United Nations, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  14. C. J. Ruan, J. A. T. da Silva, S. Mopper, Q. Pei, and S. Lutts, “Halophyte improvement for a salinized world,” Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 329–359, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Ramadoss, V. K. Lakkineni, P. Bose, S. Ali, and K. Annapurna, “Mitigation of salt stress in wheat seedlings by halotolerant bacteria isolated from saline habitats,” SpringerPlus, vol. 2, no. 1, article 6, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. Tiwari, P. Singh, R. Tiwari et al., “Salt-tolerant rhizobacteria-mediated induced tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and chemical diversity in rhizosphere enhance plant growth,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 907–916, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Argandoña, R. Fernández-Carazo, I. Llamas et al., “The moderately halophilic bacterium Halomonas maura is a free-living diazotroph,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 244, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Bashan, M. Moreno, and E. Troyo, “Growth promotion of the seawater-irrigated oilseed halophyte Salicornia bigelovii inoculated with mangrove rhizosphere bacteria and halotolerant Azospirillum spp.,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 265–272, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. I. Gontia, K. Kavita, M. Schmid, A. Hartmann, and B. Jha, “Brachybacterium saurashtrense sp. nov., a halotolerant root-associated bacterium with plant growth-promoting potential,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 61, part 12, pp. 2799–2804, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Ozawa, J. Wu, and S. Fujii, “Effect of inoculation with a strain of Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes isolated from the endorhizosphere of Salicornia europea on salt tolerance of the glasswort,” Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. E. Rueda-Puente, T. Castellanos, E. Troyo-Diéguez, J. L. D. de León-Alvarez, and B. Murillo-Amador, “Effects of a nitrogen-fixing indigenous bacterium (Klebsiella pneumoniae) on the growth and development of the halophyte Salicornia bigelovii as a new crop for saline environments,” Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 189, no. 5, pp. 323–332, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. Jha, I. Gontia, and A. Hartmann, “The roots of the halophyte Salicornia brachiata are a source of new halotolerant diazotrophic bacteria with plant growth-promoting potential,” Plant and Soil, vol. 356, no. 1-2, pp. 265–277, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Forssk, Fl. Aeg. Arab. 2. 1775.
  24. E. Le Floc’h, L. Boulos, and E. Vela, Catalogue synonymique commenté de la flore de Tunisie, République tunisienne ministère de l’environnement et du développement durable banque nationale de genes, 2010.
  25. C. Schbereiter-Gurtner, G. Piñar, W. Lubitz, and S. Rölleke, “An advanced molecular strategy to identify bacterial communities on art objects,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 77–87, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. Muyzer, E. C. de Waal, and A. G. Uitterlinden, “Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 695–700, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Cardinale, L. Brusetti, P. Quatrini et al., “Comparison of different primer sets for use in automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of complex bacterial communities,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 6147–6156, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. Daffonchio, S. Borin, G. Frova, P. L. Manachini, and C. Sorlini, “PCR fingerprinting of whole genomes, the spacers between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes and of intergenic tRNA gene regions reveal a different intraspecific genomic variability of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus licheniformis,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 48, pp. 107–116, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  29. J. M. Bric, R. M. Bostock, and S. E. Silverstone, “Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 535–538, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  30. F. Ahmad, I. Ahmad, and M. S. Khan, “Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities,” Microbiological Research, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 173–181, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. C. Cappuccino and N. Sherman, “Negative staining,” in Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual, J. C. Cappuccino and N. Sherman, Eds., pp. 125–179, Benjamin/Cummings, Redwood City, Calif, USA, 3rd edition, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  32. P. Nielsen and J. Sørensen, “Multi-target and medium-independent fungal antagonism by hydrolytic enzymes in Paenibacillus polymyxa and Bacillus pumilus strains from barley rhizosphere,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 183–192, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. M. Penrose and B. R. Glick, “Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. F. Poly, L. J. Monrozier, and R. Bally, “Improvement in the RFLP procedure for studying the diversity of nifH genes in communities of nitrogen fixers in soil,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. Lambertsen, C. Sternberg, and S. Molin, “Mini-Tn7 transposons for site-specific tagging of bacteria with fluorescent proteins,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 726–732, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. W. T. Liu, T. L. Marsh, H. Cheng, and L. J. Forney, “Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 4516–4522, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  37. M. M. Fisher and E. W. Triplett, “Automated approach for ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of microbial diversity and its application to freshwater bacterial communities,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 4630–4636, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  38. C. A. Lozupone and R. Knight, “Global patterns in bacterial diversity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 27, pp. 11436–11440, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  39. K. Smalla, G. Wieland, A. Buchner et al., “Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 4742–4751, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. M. Caton, L. R. Witte, H. D. Ngyuen, J. A. Buchheim, M. A. Buchheim, and M. A. Schneegurt, “Halotolerant aerobic heterotrophic bacteria from the Great Salt Plains of Oklahoma,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 449–462, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Tang, A. P. Zheng, E. S. P. Bromfield et al., “16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of halophilic and halotolerant bacteria isolated from a hypersaline pond in Sichuan, China,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 375–381, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. R. de la Haba, D. R. Arahal, M. C. Márquez, and A. Ventosa, “Phylogenetic relationships within the family Halomonadaceae based on comparative 23S and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 737–748, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. C. F. Dias, F. D. Andreote, F. Dini-Andreote et al., “Diversity and biotechnological potential of culturable bacteria from Brazilian mangrove sediment,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1305–1311, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. A. El-Tarabily and T. Youssef, “Enhancement of morphological, anatomical and physiological characteristics of seedlings of the mangrove Avicennia marina inoculated with a native phosphate-solubilizing isolate of Oceanobacillus picturae under greenhouse conditions,” Plant and Soil, vol. 332, no. 1, pp. 147–162, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. B. E. Michel and M. R. Kaufmann, “The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000,” Plant Physiology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 914–917, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. P. Hua, A. Hamza-Chaffai, R. H. Vreeland, H. Isoda, and T. Naganuma, “Virgibacillus salarius sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolated from a Saharan salt lake,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2409–2414, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. T. Quesada, M. Aguilera, J. A. Morillo, A. Ramos-Cormenzana, and M. Monteoliva-Sánchez, “Virgibacillus olivae sp. nov., isolated from waste wash-water from processing of Spanish-style green olives,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 906–910, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. I. Romano, L. Lama, P. Orlando, B. Nicolaus, A. Giordano, and A. Gambacorta, “Halomonas sinaiensis sp. nov., a novel halophilic bacterium isolated from a salt lake inside Ras Muhammad Park, Egypt,” Extremophiles, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 789–796, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. Sánchez-Porro, R. R. de la Haba, N. Soto-Ramírez, M. C. Márquez, R. Montalvo-Rodríguez, and A. Ventosa, “Description of Kushneria aurantia gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Halomonadaceae, and a proposal for reclassification of Halomonas marisflavi as Kushneria marisflavi comb. nov., of Halomonas indalinina as Kushneria indalinina comb. nov. and of Halomonas avicenniae as Kushneria avicenniae comb. nov,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 397–405, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. N. Soto-Ramírez, C. Sánchez-Porro, S. Rosas et al., “Halomonas avicenniae sp. nov., isolated from the salty leaves of the black mangrove Avicennia germinans in Puerto Rico,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 900–905, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Compant, B. Duffy, J. Nowak, C. Clément, and E. A. Barka, “Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 4951–4959, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. Compant, C. Clément, and A. Sessitsch, “Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 669–678, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. S. Redman, Y. O. Kim, C. J. D. A. Woodward et al., “Increased fitness of rice plants to abiotic stress via habitat adapted symbiosis: a strategy for mitigating impacts of climate change,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 7, Article ID e14823, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S. Timmusk, V. Paalme, T. Pavlicek et al., “Bacterial distribution in the rhizosphere of wild barley under contrasting microclimates,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID e17968, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. A. Siddikee, P. S. Chauhan, R. Anandham, G. H. Han, and T. Sa, “Isolation, characterization, and use for plant growth promotion under salt stress, of ACC deaminase-producing halotolerant bacteria derived from coastal soil,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1577–1584, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. V. Sgroy, F. Cassán, O. Masciarelli, M. F. del Papa, A. Lagares, and V. Luna, “Isolation and characterization of endophytic plant growth-promoting (PGPB) or stress homeostasis-regulating (PSHB) bacteria associated to the halophyte Prosopis strombulifera,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 371–381, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. Bacilio, H. Rodriguez, M. Moreno, J. P. Hernandez, and Y. Bashan, “Mitigation of salt stress in wheat seedlings by a gfp-tagged Azospirillum lipoferum,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 188–193, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. B. Fan, X. H. Chen, A. Budiharjo, W. Bleiss, J. Vater, and R. Borriss, “Efficient colonization of plant roots by the plant growth promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42, engineered to express green fluorescent protein,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 303–311, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. B. Fan, R. Borriss, W. Bleiss, and X. Wu, “Gram-positive rhizobacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 colonizes three types of plants in different patterns,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Francesca Mapelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

4381 Views | 2296 Downloads | 71 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder