BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Propionibacterium Acnes in Human Health and Disease

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 530382 |

Jess Rollason, Andrew McDowell, Hanne B. Albert, Emma Barnard, Tony Worthington, Anthony C. Hilton, Ann Vernallis, Sheila Patrick, Tom Elliott, Peter Lambert, "Genotypic and Antimicrobial Characterisation of Propionibacterium acnes Isolates from Surgically Excised Lumbar Disc Herniations", BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 530382, 7 pages, 2013.

Genotypic and Antimicrobial Characterisation of Propionibacterium acnes Isolates from Surgically Excised Lumbar Disc Herniations

Academic Editor: Yoshinobu Eishi
Received10 Feb 2013
Revised21 May 2013
Accepted01 Jun 2013
Published28 Aug 2013


The anaerobic skin commensal Propionibacterium acnes is an underestimated cause of human infections and clinical conditions. Previous studies have suggested a role for the bacterium in lumbar disc herniation and infection. To further investigate this, five biopsy samples were surgically excised from each of 64 patients with lumbar disc herniation. P. acnes and other bacteria were detected by anaerobic culture, followed by biochemical and PCR-based identification. In total, 24/64 (38%) patients had evidence of P. acnes in their excised herniated disc tissue. Using recA and mAb typing methods, 52% of the isolates were type II (50% of culture-positive patients), while type IA strains accounted for 28% of isolates (42% patients). Type III (11% isolates; 21% patients) and type IB strains (9% isolates; 17% patients) were detected less frequently. The MIC values for all isolates were lowest for amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, rifampicin, tetracycline, and vancomycin (≤1mg/L). The MIC for fusidic acid was 1-2 mg/L. The MIC for trimethoprim and gentamicin was 2 to ≥4 mg/L. The demonstration that type II and III strains, which are not frequently recovered from skin, predominated within our isolate collection (63%) suggests that the role of P. acnes in lumbar disc herniation should not be readily dismissed.

1. Introduction

As a member of the normal skin and oral microbiota, Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) is frequently dismissed as a contaminant of clinical samples. While a likely pathogenic role in the inflammatory skin condition acne vulgaris has been well documented [1], evidence is now emerging that suggests P. acnes is important in a number of other infections and clinical conditions. These include infections of indwelling medical devices [2], sciatica [3], and discitis [4, 5]. Furthermore, whole genome sequencing of multiple P. acnes strains has provided valuable insights into the range of putative virulence factors and proteins that may facilitate attachment, inflammation, and pathogenicity [6, 7].

As a consequence of tooth brushing and endodontic therapy, P. acnes can asymptomatically invade the blood stream leading to transient bacteraemia that may be important in the initiation of particular types of infection [8, 9]. A previous study has suggested an association between P. acnes and lumbar disc herniation [3]. Intervertebral disc herniation causes nuclear disc material to be forced into the spinal canal where neocapillarisation occurs around the tissue followed by accumulation of mononuclear leukocytes, macrophages, and inflammation [10, 11]. Although P. acnes may be present in low numbers in the bloodstream, the avascular nuclear disc material in the spinal canal could provide an ideal anaerobic environment for opportunistic P. acnes infection [12]. It has therefore been proposed that P. acnes may cause chronic, low-grade infection in herniated discs. Such infection in patients with lumbar disc herniation could lead to bone oedema (Modic changes/low grade discitis), low back pain, and inflammation [12]. Recent studies suggest discs infected with anaerobic bacteria are more likely to develop Modic changes and low grade discitis in the adjacent vertebrae than those in which no bacteria or aerobic bacteria are isolated [13]. Distinguishing between a bacterial association with lumbar disc herniation and contamination of the surgical wound by the normal skin microbiota is critical in defining a microbial role [14]. Research has demonstrated that antibiotic treatment has a positive effect upon physiological symptoms and reducing pain associated with lumbar disc herniation and chronic back conditions [15, 16]. This observation, along with evidence that P. acnes can be isolated from excised disc herniation tissue, supports the theory that bacterial infection may play a key role [13]. Molecular analysis of P. acnes isolated from disc herniation tissue is now essential to further understand this condition.

We have previously shown that P. acnes comprises a number of distinct evolutionary lineages, designated types IA, IB, II, and III, based on single locus phylotyping [17, 18]. This classification has now been expanded based on Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) and whole genome sequencing to types IA1, IA2, IB, IC, II, and III which is further supported at the clinical and phenotypic level [19]. Evidence suggests these phylogroups may have differing pathogenicity traits and may be associated with various clinical disease states [2022]. In particular, type III strains have been linked to surgically excised spinal disc material, although it is unclear at this stage if this is clinically meaningful [18].

The aim of this study was to investigate the phylogroup status of P. acnes cultured from excised disc nucleus material of 64 patients with lumbar disc herniations. In addition, antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined to inform possible future treatment regimens and studies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Subjects and Biopsy Collection

A total of 64 patients (attending The Mølholm Hospital, Vejle, Denmark) undergoing discectomy surgery, and between the ages of 18–65 years, were included in this study [13]. All patients were diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation confirmed by MRI. Patients were excluded if antibiotic treatment had been received within two weeks of the study start date. All patients were immunocompetent and none had received a previous epidural steroid injection or undergone back surgery. Five separate nucleus disc tissue samples were surgically removed from each patient as recommended by the IDSA for investigation of prosthetic joint infection [23]. To reduce any potential contamination of excised biopsies, skin was treated preoperatively for 2 min with 2% (v/v) chlorhexidine in 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol. The nucleus material (centre of the disc that is herniated) was extracted with a fresh set of sterile instruments for each individual biopsy. To prevent growth inhibition of any bacteria present in the biopsy samples, one high dose (1.5 g) cefuroxime was administered intravenously after the tissue samples were retrieved. Biopsies were placed in separate sterile glass vials and immediately frozen at −80°C. The samples were transported to Aston University frozen in thermal transport boxes designed for organ transport.

2.2. Bacterial Culture

All tissue samples were cut into smaller fragments, and the tissue broken apart and ground up, using an individually packaged sterile scalpel [3]. As a further precaution, all scalpels were dipped in 70% (v/v) ethanol and passed through a Bunsen burner flame before use. With a sterilised scalpel, the processed and ground up tissue sample was first spread across the surface of a Columbia blood agar (CBA) plate (Oxoid, UK), and then collectively embedded into the centre of the plate [3]. For each individual tissue sample, one section of tissue was used for aerobic and one for anaerobic incubation at 37°C (Don Whitley MiniMacs Anaerobic Workstation, 80% nitrogen, 10% CO2 and 10% H2). Plates were incubated for a minimum of seven days.

2.3. Molecular and Phenotypic Identification

Colonies were subcultured onto CBA plates and incubated under aerobic or anaerobic conditions for 24 hrs at 37°C before Gram-staining. Presumptive P. acnes isolates were then identified by biochemical analysis using the Rapid ID 32A kit (bioMerieux). Presumptive Staphylococcus spp. were identified using standard biochemical tests (oxidase and catalase), and latex agglutination for clumping factor/protein A used to distinguish S. aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci. P. acnes isolates were confirmed by 16S rRNA-based PCR using the primers and conditions previously described [24] after extraction of genomic DNA using a rapid boil method [25].

2.4. recA Sequence Analysis

Nucleotide sequence analysis of the recA housekeeping gene was initially used to differentiate P. acnes isolates into phylogroups IA, IA/IB, IC, II, or III [17, 18]. The recA locus was amplified with the previously described primers PAR-1 and PAR-2, which are directed to downstream and upstream flanking sequences of the recA open reading frame, respectively, and generate a 1201 bp amplicon [17]. Sequencing reactions were performed using ABI PRISM ready reaction terminator cycle sequencing kits (version 1.1; Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the samples analysed on an ABI PRISM 3100 genetic analyser capillary electrophoresis system (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems).

2.5. Monoclonal Antibody Typing

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) typing by immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM) was carried out as previously described [17]. All P. acnes isolates were examined with the mouse mAbs QUBPa1 and QUBPa2, which target dermatan-sulphate-binding adhesins and a carbohydrate/glycolipid-containing antigen on type IA and type II strains, respectively [17, 18]. Strains of type IB or type III do not react with these mAbs, while all type IC isolates analysed to date show dual reaction in keeping with their distinct nature [26]. Slides were viewed using a Leitz Dialux 20 fluorescence microscope.

2.6. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Determination by Agar Dilution

The MIC was determined for each isolate against a range of antibiotics using the CLSI reference agar dilution procedure [27]. The following antibiotics were used: amoxicillin, erythromycin, tetracycline, trimethoprim, fusidic acid, gentamicin, rifampicin, vancomycin, and ciprofloxacin (Mast Diagnostics, UK). P. acnes type strain NCTC 737 (type IA1) was used as a control. Plates were incubated anaerobically for 72 hours at 37°C. The MIC of each antibiotic for each isolate was recorded at the lowest concentration at which there was no visible growth.

2.7. Statistical analysis

Overall phylogroup distribution was analysed using the Chi-squared test. Statistical significance was taken as .

3. Results

3.1. Culture of P. acnes and Staphylococcus spp. from Intervertebral Disc Tissue

A total of 24/64 (38%) patients were positive for P. acnes by culture of their intervertebral disc tissue following discectomy; colony numbers ranged from 1–150 CFU per sample. In addition, we also noted that for all positive samples a lawn of bacterial growth between the embedded tissue and the agar was present, along with a zone of α-haemolysis around the tissue. A total of six patients were positive for P. acnes in all five of their samples ( ), while three patients were positive in 4/5 ( ), three patients in 3/5 ( ), four patients in 2/5 ( ) and eight patients in 1/5 ( ) of their samples (Figure 1). No significant distribution was seen between colonies isolated and number of positive samples per patient. In total, 67 P. acnes isolates were recovered from 24 patients. A total of 5/64 (8%) patients were positive for presumptive coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. In total, only two patients had tissue samples containing both P. acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci. In both cases, the coagulase-negative staphylococci were only present in 1/5 five tissue samples obtained.

Additionally, from one patient (positive for P. acnes) a single Gram negative diplococci colony was isolated following aerobic culture. This isolate was identified on only one of the five tissue samples analysed for that patient.

3.2. recA and mAb Typing of P. acnes Isolates

Using the combined approach of recA sequence analysis and mAb typing, it was possible to accurately classify all P. acnes isolates into phylogroups IA (IA1 and IA2), IB, IC, II, or III. Of the 67 P. acnes isolates, 52% were found to belong to the type II lineage, present in 12/24 (50%) patients, 28% were type IA, present in 10/24 (42%) patients, 11% type III, present in 5/24 (21%) patients, and 9% type IB, recovered from 4/24 (17%) patients ( ). No isolates were found to belong to the recently described type IC lineage [26]. In 6/24 patients, multiple P. acnes phylogroups were identified from the five tissue samples obtained. These results are illustrated in Figure 2. As part of our epidemiological investigations, we also examined a further seven P. acnes isolates recovered from excised disc tissue during a previous study. A total of four isolates were type III, two were type IB and one isolate was type IA. Of all 74 isolates examined, therefore, 48% were type II, 27% type IA, 14% type III, and 11% type IB ( ).

3.3. Antibiotic Susceptibility

For all P. acnes isolates tested (including type strain NCTC 737) the MIC values were lowest for amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, rifampicin, tetracycline, and vancomycin (≤1 mg/L). The MIC for fusidic acid was 1-2 mg/L. The MIC for trimethoprim and gentamicin was 2 to 4 mg/L (Table 1).

AntibioticMIC (mg/L)

Amoxicillin3136, 1*
Ciprofloxacin67, 1*
Erythromycin1057, 1*
Fusidic acid1156, 1*
Rifampicin67, 1*
Tetracycline67, 1*
Vancomycin12343, 1*
Trimethoprim1453, 1*
Gentamicin67, 1*

P. acnes NCTC 737.

4. Discussion

In this study, 24/64 (38%) patients with a lumbar disc herniation had P. acnes present in intervertebral disc tissue following discectomy. This supports previous findings that also demonstrated the presence of P. acnes in excised disc material [3, 28]. Herniated discs reside in an environment of low oxygen tension due to the lack of vascularisation. This may provide an ideal environment for anaerobic bacteria, such as P. acnes, to multiply and manifest as a localised infection. The prevalence of P. acnes in herniated disc tissue may indicate bacterial infection as a possible cause of the clinical manifestations associated with this condition, such as bone oedema (Modic changes), low back pain and inflammation [12, 15]. To balance this possibility, previous studies have shown that the presence of P. acnes in spinal tissue can reflect intraoperative skin contamination [14]. It is important, therefore, to recognise that surgical wound contamination is an important issue during back surgery, even after preoperative skin disinfection, and that biopsy contamination must always be considered. The IDSA state that two or more intraoperative positive cultures that yield the same organism may be considered as evidence of prosthetic joint infection, applying similar criteria to this study suggests infection in 16 (25%) of the 64 patients. Eight patients (12.5%) were positive for P. acnes in only 1/5 of their samples; IDSA guidelines indicate these isolates may not represent true infection [23]. This study, and those of others, does however provide some evidence to suggest that the role of intracellular disc bacteria in the pathophysiology of disc degeneration and herniation should not readily be dismissed as contamination, at least not in all contexts [29].

In this study, to reduce any possible contamination of the excised biopsies, skin was cleaned preoperatively for 2 min with 2% (v/v) chlorhexidine in 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol. Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of 2% (v/v) chlorhexidine in 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to bone surgery, where the rate of positive cultures after skin preparation was zero [30]. This provides evidence that such preparations are effective against bacteria present on the skin surface overlying the lumbar spine; however, it is unclear if such methods are as effective against bacteria within deeper parts of the skin. The majority of tissue extracts provided monocultures of P. acnes under anaerobic culture, although in six patients multiple phylotypes were present. If skin contamination during surgery or laboratory processing occurred, then we may assume that a greater variety of resident skin microbiota would have been detected. Only two patients had tissue samples containing both P. acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci. In these cases, coagulase-negative staphylococci were only present in 1/5 tissue samples obtained. Furthermore, Stirling et al. [3] used the same skin operating procedures as this study and found that skin contamination was absent in control samples from patients undergoing spinal surgery not related to lumbar disc herniation.

To investigate the phylogroup pattern of all P. acnes isolates we used a combination of previously described recA and mAb typing methods [1719]. The recA housekeeping gene has proved a very robust locus for differentiation of strains into the main genetic divisions of P. acnes (types I, II, and III) but has been shown to suffer from reduced specificity when it is used to identity some strains of type IA from IB [18]. The latter problem arises as type IA1 strains from clonal complex (CC) 4 (Belfast MLST scheme), and all type IA2 strains, contain the same recA sequence polymorphism that defines all type IB strains [19, 31]. If recA sequencing is used, however, in conjunction with mAbs that target type IA and type II strains, then all isolates can be reliably differentiated into types IA, IB, IC, II, and III. The method is relatively straightforward and inexpensive when compared to other techniques, such as MLST, but clearly will not provide high resolution typing of strains if required. Nevertheless, the method still provides valuable epidemiological data and proves extremely useful for prioritising isolates for further downstream analyses.

With this approach we found that type II strains were the dominant phylogroup isolated followed by type IA, and to a lesser extent type III and type IB. These results fit with previous observations that strains of type IB, II, and III, while infrequently isolated from acneic skin, appear more typically associated with blood, soft tissue, medical implant, endodontic infections, and normal skin [1719, 3133], although the clinical relevance of these associations remains unclear in many instances. It is important to note that type II and III strains, which collectively represent the majority of all the isolates, do not appear to be especially abundant on the skin when compared with type IA strains, at least based on the analysis of facial and upper trunk skin [17, 31]. This provides further evidence to support the view that their presence in excised disc material should not simply be dismissed as a result of contamination from skin microbiota surrounding the surgical wound, at least not in all cases. Interestingly, the type III lineage was only discovered when isolates from excised disc material were analysed [18]. The observation that type IA strains also represented a significant proportion of the P. acnes population isolated from excised disc material is also consistent with previous observations that this evolutionary division of P. acnes, while strongly associated with moderate-to-severe cases of acne [19, 31], can also be associated with other types of soft tissue infections, including bacterial keratitis and endophthalmitis [19]. We found no evidence for the recently described multiresistant type IC group amongst our isolates (containing a unique recA allele) which, to date, appears only acne associated [26]. While specific P. acnes phylogroups have been linked with various clinical conditions and pathogenic lineages [19], it would appear that in the case of lumbar disc herniation, multiple types can still be isolated. While the clinical importance of these different phylogroups is unclear in relation to herniated discs, the particular predominance of type II strains may prove an important observation and tentatively suggest a potential pathogenic role in this condition; in six patients only type II strains were isolated from multiple samples. Further work will, however, be required before any solid conclusions can be made.

Determining the antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates associated with lumbar herniation and discitis may inform future treatment regimes. In this study, we found that susceptibilities were comparable to previous studies with clinical P. acnes isolates [3436]. Treatment of prosthetic or postsurgical P.  acnes infection currently includes penicillin/amoxicillin, vancomycin, clindamycin, or rifampicin/linezolid [3740]. This study demonstrates low MIC values for a number of these commonly used antimicrobials against P. acnes isolated in this study. Current treatment for back pain focuses upon pain control, physiotherapy, and surgery. Prevalence of P. acnes at the site of ruptured lumbar discs as demonstrated by this study and at the site of sciatica [3] suggests antibiotics may play a future role in the treatment of back pain. Albert et al. [15, 16] demonstrated antibiotic treatment with Amoxicillin-clavulanate had a positive effect upon patients with chronic back conditions in relation to lower back pain intensity, number of days with pain, disease-, and patient-specific function. Demonstration that discs infected with anaerobic bacteria are more likely to develop Modic changes and low grade discitis [13], along with evidence that P. acnes can be isolated from excised disc herniation tissue (demonstrated by this study) supports the theory that bacterial infection may play a key role.

Prolonged antimicrobial treatment of acne vulgaris has resulted in the emergence of P. acnes strains with resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline [4143]. Multiresistance is often observed in isolates originating from acneic skin [19]. In contrast, all the type IA strains obtained from disc tissue in this study demonstrate sensitivity to both tetracycline and erythromycin.

5. Conclusion

In this study, a total of 38% of patients had P. acnes present at the site of disc herniation. This study therefore provides further evidence to support a possible association between P. acnes and chronic low-grade infection in herniated discs, potentially leading to clinical manifestations associated with this condition, such as bone oedema (modic changes), low back pain, and inflammation. While we accept that even after stringent preoperative skin disinfection, contamination of biopsy samples with skin microbiota cannot be fully excluded, the predominance of isolates from lineages not commonly recovered from skin in relative terms does provide tentative evidence in favour for a role in disc herniation. P. acnes isolated from excised disc tissue remains susceptible to most classes of antimicrobials, which may prove important for informing future treatment regimens for back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation. While P. acnes isolated from herniated discs demonstrated genetic variability between and within individual patient samples, the dominance of type II isolates suggests strains from this particular division might be important in this clinical condition. Large scale studies must now be pursued to definitively determine the importance of P. acnes at the site of lumbar disc herniations and to enable a clear distinction of surgical wound contamination arising from the normal skin microbiota, along with more detailed MLST analysis of isolates for the identification of particular STs that might be associated with this condition. It will also be valuable to determine the distribution of different phylogroups in lumbar skin preoperatively, and how these relate to the results from excised material, and further assess the effect of antimicrobial treatment upon pathological symptoms associated with the condition. Investigations into P. acnes pathogenesis and virulence mechanisms in associated lumbar disc infections are also warranted.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by The Scientific Ethics Region of Southern Denmark no. VF-20060085. All patients signed a written informed consent.


Andrew McDowell was supported by an R & D Office of the Health and Personal Social Services Northern Ireland grant awarded to Sheila Patrick, and Emma Barnard by a prostate cancer charity, United Kingdom grant awarded to Andrew McDowell and Sheila Patrick.


  1. C. Dessinioti and A. D. Katsambas, “The role of Propionibacterium acnes in acne pathogenesis: facts and controversies,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 2–7, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. Arnell, K. Cesarini, A. Lagerqvist-Widh, T. Wester, and J. Sjölin, “Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections in children over a 13-year period: anaerobic cultures and comparison of clinical signs of infection with Propionibacterium acnes and with other bacteria,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 366–372, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Stirling, T. Worthington, M. Rafiq, P. A. Lambert, and T. S. J. Elliott, “Association between sciatica and Propionibacterium acnes,” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9273, pp. 2024–2025, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. E. Harris, C. Hennicke, K. Byers, and W. C. Welch, “Postoperative discitis due to Propionibacterium acnes: a case report and review of the literature,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 538–541, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. Uçkay, A. Dinh, L. Vauthey et al., “Spondylodiscitis due to Propionibacterium acnes: report of twenty-nine cases and a review of the literature,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 353–358, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Brüggemann, A. Henne, F. Hoster et al., “The complete genome sequence of Propionibacterium acnes, a commensal of human skin,” Science, vol. 305, no. 5684, pp. 671–673, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. Brzuszkiewicz, J. Weiner, A. Wollherr et al., “Comparative genomics and transcriptomics of Propionibacterium acnes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e21581, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. J. Debelian, I. Olsen, and L. Tronstad, “Bacteremia in conjunction with endodontic therapy,” Endodontics & Dental Traumatology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 142–149, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  9. G. J. Roberts, H. S. Holzel, M. R. J. Sury, N. A. Simmons, P. Gardner, and P. Longhurst, “Dental bacteremia in children,” Pediatric Cardiology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 24–27, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Doita, T. Kanatani, T. Harada, and K. Mizuno, “Immunohistologic study of the ruptured intervertebral disc of the lumbar spine,” Spine, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 235–241, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Ito, M. Yamada, F. Ikuta et al., “Histologic evidence of absorption of sequestration-type herniated disc,” Spine, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 230–234, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. B. Albert, P. Kjaer, T. S. Jensen, J. S. Sorensen, T. Bendix, and C. Manniche, “Modic changes, possible causes and relation to low back pain,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 361–368, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. B. Albert, P. Lambert, J. Rollason et al., “Does nuclear tissue infected with bacteria following disc herniations lead to Modic changes in the adjacent vertebrae?” European Spine Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 690–696, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. G. C. McLorinan, J. V. Glenn, M. G. McMullan, and S. Patrick, “Propionibacterium acnes wound contamination at the time of spinal surgery,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 437, pp. 67–73, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. B. Albert, C. Manniche, J. S. Sorensen, and B. W. Deleuran, “Antibiotic treatment in patients with low-back pain associated with Modic changes type 1 (bone oedema): a pilot study,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 969–973, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. B. Albert, J. S. Sorensen, B. S. Christensen, and C. Manniche, “Antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and vertebral bone edema (Modic type 1 changes): a double-blind randomized clinical controlled trial of efficacy,” European Spine Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 697–707, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  17. A. McDowell, S. Valanne, G. Ramage et al., “Propionibacterium acnes types I and II represent phylogenetically distinct groups,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 326–334, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. McDowell, A. L. Perry, P. A. Lambert, and S. Patrick, “A new phylogenetic group of Propionibacterium acnes,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 218–224, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. McDowell, E. Barnard, I. Nagy et al., “An expanded multilocus sequence typing scheme for Propionibacterium acnes: investigation of “pathogenic”, “commensal” and antibiotic resistant strains,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID e41480, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  20. S. Valanne, A. McDowell, G. Ramage et al., “CAMP factor homologues in Propionibacterium acnes: a new protein family differentially expressed by types I and II,” Microbiology, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 1369–1379, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. J. Lodes, H. Secrist, D. R. Benson et al., “Variable expression of immunoreactive surface proteins of Propionibacterium acnes,” Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 12, pp. 3667–3681, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. I. Nagy, A. Pivarcsi, K. Kis et al., “Propionibacterium acnes and lipopolysaccharide induce the expression of antimicrobial peptides and proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines in human sebocytes,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 2195–2205, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. R. Osmon, E. F. Berbari, A. R. Berendt et al., “Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  24. K. S. Sfanos and W. B. Isaacs, “An evaluation of PCR primer sets used for detection of Propionibacterium acnes in prostate tissue samples,” Prostate, vol. 68, no. 14, pp. 1492–1495, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. M. Caddick, A. C. Hilton, J. Rollason, P. A. Lambert, T. Worthington, and T. S. J. Elliott, “Molecular analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus reveals an absence of plasmid DNA in multidrug-resistant isolates,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 297–302, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. McDowell, J. Hunyadkürti, B. Horváth et al., “Draft genome sequence of an antibiotic-resistant Propionibacterium acnes strain, PRP-38, from the novel type IC cluster,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 194, no. 12, pp. 3260–3261, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria, Approved Standard M11-A7, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 7th edition, 2007.
  28. V. Agarwal, S. R. Golish, and T. F. Alamin, “Bacteriologic culture of excised intervertebral disc from immunocompetent patients undergoing single level primary lumbar microdiscectomy,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 397–400, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Arndt, Y. P. Charles, C. Koebel, I. Bogorin, and J. P. Steib, “Bacteriology of degenerated lumbar intervertebral disks,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 211–216, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  30. J. W. Savage, B. M. Weatherford, P. A. Sugrue et al., “Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in lumbar spine surgery,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 490–494, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. H. B. Lomholt and M. Kilian, “Population genetic analysis of Propionibacterium acnes identifies a subpopulation and epidemic clones associated with acne,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 8, Article ID e12277, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. A. Niazi, D. Clarke, T. Do, S. C. Gilbert, F. Mannocci, and D. Beighton, “Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from refractory endodontic lesions are opportunistic pathogens,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 3859–3869, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Kilian, C. F. P. Scholz, and H. B. Lomholt, “Multilocus sequence typing and phylogenetic analysis of Propionibacterium acnes,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1158–1165, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. A. Denys, R. C. Jerris, J. M. Swenson, and C. Thornsberry, “Susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes clinical isolates to 22 antimicrobial agents,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 335–337, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  35. F. Mory, S. Fougnot, C. Rabaud, H. Schuhmacher, and A. Lozniewski, “In vitro activities of cefotaxime, vancomycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid and other antibiotics alone and in combination against Propionibacterium acnes isolates from central nervous system infections,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 265–268, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. Oprica, C. E. Nord, S. Kalenic et al., “European surveillance study on the antibiotic susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 204–213, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. E. Jakab, R. Zbinden, J. Gubler, C. Ruef, A. Von Graevenitz, and M. Krause, “Severe infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes: an underestimated pathogen in late postoperative infections,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 477–482, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. Nisbet, S. Briggs, R. Ellis-Pegler, M. Thomas, and D. Holland, “Propionibacterium acnes: an under-appreciated cause of post-neurosurgical infection,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1097–1103, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Bayston, B. Nuradeen, W. Ashraf, and B. J. C. Freeman, “Antibiotics for the eradication of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms in surgical infection,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1298–1301, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. Y. Levy, F. Fenollar, A. Stein et al., “Propionibacterium acnes postoperative shoulder arthritis: an emerging clinical entity,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1884–1886, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. I. Kurokawa, S. Nishijima, and S. Kawabata, “Antimicrobial susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes isolated from acne vulgaris,” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 25–28, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  42. J. I. Ross, A. M. Snelling, E. A. Eady et al., “Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antibiotic-resistant Propionibacterium acnes isolated from acne patients attending dermatology clinics in Europe, the U.S.A., Japan and Australia,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 339–346, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. Oprica, L. Emtestam, J. Lapins et al., “Antibiotic-resistant Propionibacterium acnes on the skin of patients with moderate to severe acne in Stockholm,” Anaerobe, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 155–164, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Jess Rollason et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles