BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Inflammatory Reaction in Neurological Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 309129 |

Christopher Millington, Sandra Sonego, Niloo Karunaweera, Alejandra Rangel, Janice R. Aldrich-Wright, Iain L. Campbell, Erika Gyengesi, Gerald Münch, "Chronic Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease: New Perspectives on Animal Models and Promising Candidate Drugs", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 309129, 10 pages, 2014.

Chronic Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease: New Perspectives on Animal Models and Promising Candidate Drugs

Academic Editor: Cheng-Hsien Lu
Received28 Feb 2014
Revised14 May 2014
Accepted14 May 2014
Published16 Jun 2014


Chronic neuroinflammation is now considered one of the major factors in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the most widely used transgenic AD models (overexpressing mutated forms of amyloid precursor protein, presenilin, and/or tau) do not demonstrate the degree of inflammation, neurodegeneration (particularly of the cholinergic system), and cognitive decline that is comparable with the human disease. Hence a more suitable animal model is needed to more closely mimic the resulting cognitive decline and memory loss in humans in order to investigate the effects of neuroinflammation on neurodegeneration. One of these models is the glial fibrillary acidic protein-interleukin 6 (GFAP-IL6) mouse, in which chronic neuroinflammation triggered constitutive expression of the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) in astrocytes. These transgenic mice show substantial and progressive neurodegeneration as well as a decline in motor skills and cognitive function, starting from 6 months of age. This animal model could serve as an excellent tool for drug discovery and validation in vivo. In this review, we have also selected three potential anti-inflammatory drugs, curcumin, apigenin, and tenilsetam, as candidate drugs, which could be tested in this model.

1. Alzheimer’s Disease

1.1. Alzheimer’s Disease: A Disease without a Neuroprotective Treatment

Dementia is one of the major causes of disability and dependency among older people worldwide. In 2012, 35.6 million people have dementia worldwide and there are 7.7 million new cases reported every year [1]. It has been predicted that the number of people affected by dementia will double every 20 years to 81.1 million by 2040 [1]. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, accounting for up to 70% of all sporadic, late-onset cases of dementia. In an aging population, the number of dementia sufferers increases every year and this poses significant health and social problems for society in the very near future. Despite decades of research dedicated to the development of new pharmaceutical compounds designed to slow down disease progression, no drugs with real disease-modifying properties are available at this point in time. There is a growing consensus in the scientific community that disease-modifying treatments which start before the onset of clinical dementia are needed [2].

1.2. Neuropsychology and Pathophysiology of AD

The first behavioural symptoms of AD include significant memory problems in immediate recall and short-term or long-term memory. Additionally there are significant deficits in at least one of four areas: expressing or comprehending language; identifying familiar objects through the senses; poor coordination, gait, or muscle function; and the executive functions of planning, ordering, and making judgments. These symptoms appear gradually and become steadily impaired over time [3].

The main pathological hallmarks of AD are two types of protein deposits, amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles and the degeneration of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain and the associated loss of cholinergic neurotransmission in the cerebral cortex and other areas. [4]. Amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide is the main constituent of senile plaques and creates one of the key pathological features of AD. Although the initial cause of sporadic AD is still debated, the “amyloid cascade hypothesis” states that the aberrant production, aggregation, and deposition of Aβ is a causative process in the pathogenesis of AD [5]. Some researchers have found evidence that Aβ fibrils form pores in neurons, leading to calcium influx and the neuronal death associated with AD [6]. Apart from the direct role in cell death, Aβ-mediated glutamate receptor modifications can lead to synaptic dysfunction, resulting in excitotoxic neurodegeneration during the progression of AD [7]. However, the long list of negative clinical trials targeting amyloid production or deposition compels us yet again to reexamine the amyloid cascade hypothesis as only a marginally significant pathogenic mediator of disease and to perhaps revert back to traditional science principle where repeated negative data leads one to consider other ideas [810].

Tau is one of the microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) that stabilize neuronal microtubules for their role in the development of cell processes, establishment of cell polarity, and intracellular transport. Neurofibrillary protein aggregates are one of the major hallmarks of AD. These aggregates, also known as neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), are formed as a result of abnormal hyperphosphorylation of tau protein, aggregation into “paired helical filaments” (PHFs), cross-linked by reactive carbonyl compounds [11, 12], and loss of ability to maintain the microtubule tracks [13]. Despite a lack of understanding of the intermediate steps involved, NFT formation appears to be caused by aberrant signalling that leads to an imbalance of kinases/phosphatases, resulting in hyperphosphorylation of tau and its detachment from microtubules. Microtubule breakdown follows, an aggregation of tau into PHFs, which in turn bundle into NFTs of “neuropil threads” that then leads to the disintegration of intracellular transport and neuronal degeneration [14].

1.3. Current Treatment Strategies for AD

The two major pharmacological treatment options against AD currently available are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, a glutamate receptor associated channel blocker. Among those, cholinesterase inhibitors are the most common medications used for the treatment of AD; however these treatments are symptomatic and only temporarily effective [15]. Although antiamyloid drugs were initially hoped to slow down disease progression, all respective clinical trials have failed to yield positive results. As there are no disease-modifying therapies available for the treatment of AD at the moment, alternative targets such as low-grade neuroinflammation are attracting more and more interest in the search of a disease-modifying treatment for AD [1618].

1.4. The Cholinergic Deficit in AD

Cholinergic neurons are one of the most prominent features of the mammalian basal forebrain that can be described as a collection of aggregated and nonaggregated, large, hyperchromic neurons; many of them contain choline acetyl transferase (the key enzyme in the synthesis of acetylcholine) and project to the cerebral cortex and hippocampus [19]. Cholinergic neurons are widely distributed in the basal forebrain, including the medial septum, the nucleus of the horizontal, vertical, and lateral limbs of the diagonal bands of Broca, and the ventral pallidum, in the basal part of substantia innominata, and in the extension of amygdala. Cholinergic input from the basal forebrain to the cortex and the hippocampus has a key role in mechanisms of cognitive functions, including arousal, attention, sensory processing, and memory [20, 21]. The number and size of the basal forebrain cholinergic neurons as well as cortical acetylcholine axon density have been found to decrease with normal aging and in AD [22]. In AD, in contrast to normal ageing, the progression of brain atrophy caused by neuronal and synaptic loss is rapidly accelerated. Massive cholinergic cell death in the nucleus basalis was originally suggested to be one of the major indicators of AD [23], and the resulting cholinergic deficits in the cortical and hippocampal regions have been correlated with the severity of dementia [24]. Patients with AD have a significant decrease of acetylcholine in the cortex and show pathological changes in cholinergic basal forebrain neurons [25]. Recent evidence suggests that atrophy of the cholinergic basal forebrain in AD can be distinguished from normal age-related degeneration even at predementia stages of the disease [26]. These findings considered collectively suggest that cholinergic neuronal cell death in the basal forebrain together with the decline of the cholinergic synapse numbers in the hippocampus and the neocortex is characteristic pathological manifestation of AD. Therefore, animal models of AD need to be able to demonstrate these features to be suitable for disease modelling and drug discovery.

1.5. Chronic Neuroinflammation Occurs in Early Stages of AD

AD is associated with an inflammatory response as shown by an increased presence of activated microglia and astrocytes, activated complement proteins, cytokines, and reactive oxygen, nitrogen, and carbonyl species [2731]. These histochemical studies have been confirmed by imaging studies using positron emission tomography and the peripheral benzodiazepine ligand PK11195 as a marker for activated microglia indicates that activation of microglia occurs already in mild and early forms of AD and precedes cerebral atrophy [32, 33]. Genetic studies on AD further confirm the importance of inflammation. For example, genome-wide association studies have identified three genes that are associated with an increased risk of developing AD, CLU (clusterin), CR1 (complement receptor 1), and TREM2 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2) [34]. Furthermore, pharmacological evidence also points to the importance of neuroinflammation for AD pathogenesis. Long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been shown to delay the onset of AD, but randomized trials show no benefit from NSAIDs in AD patients. However, asymptomatic individuals treated with the NSAID, naproxen, experienced reduced AD incidence, after only 2 to 3 years [35]. In summary, these data support the significance of neuroinflammation for AD and gave rise to the hypothesis of the “cycle of self-perpetuating inflammatory neurotoxicity” [36]. (a) Multiple inflammatory triggers can lead to microglial activation. These triggers can be peripheral (such as systemic infections or peripheral chronic inflammation) or central (e.g., caused by beta-amyloid peptide in senile plaques). (b) Activated microglia release neurotoxic factors such as cytotoxic cytokines like TNF-α and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and thus cause damage to neighbouring neurons; direct neurotoxic insults (such as energy depletion and hypoxia) might further weaken neurons and make them more susceptible to microglial attack. (c) These damaged or dying neurons release microglia activators, for example, damage associated molecular patterns (alarmins), resulting in a self-perpetuating cycle of neurotoxicity. In summary, neuropathological, epidemiological, and genetic findings show clear evidence for the involvement of neuroinflammation in the early stages of sporadic AD.

2. Shortcoming in the Current Amyloid-Based Mouse Models of AD

Transgenic (Tg) mice that overexpress mutant familial Alzheimer’s disease (AD) amyloid precursor protein (APP) genes have contributed to an understanding of dementia pathology and support the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Although many sophisticated mice APP models exist, none comprises all features of AD cellular and behavioural pathology. The greater resilience of transgenic mice to substantial Aβ burdens suggests the Aβ levels and forms that are deleterious to human neurons are not as noxious in these animal models [37]. For example, the APP23 mouse model does not demonstrate all features of the human disease, such as cholinergic axon terminal deficits and extensive cholinergic cell loss in relevant areas such as in the cerebral cortex and CA hippocampal area 1 [38, 39]. Furthermore, these mice do not demonstrate the same variety of proinflammatory markers as human AD patients and generally develop a much weaker neuroinflammatory phenotype [40]. For example, when the Tg2576 mice (containing the Swedish double mutation of human APP) were examined for the expression pattern of various cytokines, only a few IL-6-immunoreactive astrocytes were observed, and iNOS immunoreactivity was completely absent [41]. Moreover, in one of our studies investigating the effect of vitamin D depletion and supplementation with vitamin D enriched mushrooms, there was no clear difference between wild-type and amyloid AD transgenic mice (APPswe/PS1dE9) in terms of learning and memory, despite significant deposition of amyloid plaques observed in the AD mice [42].

In summary, amyloid overexpressing transgenic mice were initially thought to provide a useful model to investigate the mechanisms by which cytokines contribute to the progression of AD, including cognitive decline. However, there is decreasing confidence that this is the best animal model for this purpose. Therefore, a novel model of chronic neuroinflammation with resulting neurodegeneration would be helpful; the GFAP-IL-6 mouse model could be ideal for this purpose.

3. The GFAP-IL-6 Transgenic Mouse Model as Novel Model of Chronic Neuroinflammation Relevant for AD

The GFAP IL-6 mouse line was initially generated to investigate cytokine signalling in the CNS. In this model, the murine IL-6 gene (and lacZ) is expressed in astroglia under the transcriptional control of the murine glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter, resulting in brain-specific forced expression of IL-6 [43]. In the wild-type (WT) mouse brain, IL-6 levels are undetectable, while in the GFAP-IL6 transgenic, elevated levels of IL-6 are observed in the cerebellum, the striatum, the hippocampus, the hypothalamus, the neocortex, and the pons, resulting in accelerated age-related structural changes seen within 3–6 months compared to normal aged mice [44]. It has also been shown that the level of transgene-encoded IL-6 expression in the CNS of these transgenic mice is similar to that found in EAE and thus falls within a pathophysiological range [45]. Astrocyte production of IL-6 results in a localised inflammatory state within the CNS with the activation of many acute-phase response genes including α1-antichymotrypsin, complement C3, and metallothionein [45]. Cellular changes include the activation of astrocytes and microglia, proliferative angiopathy with blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown [46], reduced hippocampal neurogenesis [44], and neurodegeneration which is accompanied by age-related deficits in learning and memory [47]. In many respects, the GFAP-IL6 mouse replicates the structural and functional neuropathology of human neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease and HIV-associated dementia [46]. Thus, this transgenic mouse not only highlights the capacity for endogenously produced IL-6 to induce inflammation and neurodegeneration in the CNS but also provides a powerful tool in which to explore the basic mechanisms that underpin IL-6 actions and associated neurodegeneration in the brain.

While it is arguable, which of the major proinflammatory cytokines might be the best to create a suitable animal model providing both severe neurodegeneration and being of relevance for AD, we believe that IL-6 is a particular good candidate. As it serves as one of the inflammatory triggers for the following reasons; IL-6 can be consistently detected in the brains of AD patients but not in the brains of nondemented elderly people [48], and increased IL-6 levels in serum have been shown to differentiate dementia from normal ageing [49]. Additionally, connections between genetic variants of IL-6 and the volume of the hippocampus were analyzed using voxel-based morphometry indicating that the IL-6 allele has a significant role in the development of brain atrophy [50]. Based on preliminary data and previous findings, this IL-6 mouse model provides an exceptional opportunity to investigate the detrimental effects of chronic neuroinflammation on the structure and function of the mammalian brain, paying special attention to its effects on the cholinergic system.

4. The IL-6 Overexpressing Mouse as a Drug Validation Model

Animal models like the GFAP-IL-6 mouse can be used to perform preclinical proof-of-concept studies and assess the efficacy, mechanism of action, and safety profile of anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective compounds. In animals treated with these compounds, cognitive, functional, and behavioural tests can be performed and complemented with tissue-based assays, to demonstrate in vivo the molecular basis, drug efficacy, and mechanism of action. Based on previous research, we have selected three candidate compounds, curcumin, apigenin, and tenilsetam, to evaluate if anti-inflammatory treatment can slow down the progression of neurodegeneration and the decline in cognitive function in the GFAP IL-6 mouse model, which will be discussed in this review.

5. Potential Anti-Inflammatory Drug Candidates for the Treatment of AD

5.1. Curcumin

Curcumin is a component of the Indian curry spice turmeric (Curcuma longa Linn). Curcumin has been shown to have various antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. For example, curcumin was shown to decrease the level of inflammatory mediators such as tumour necrosis factor- (TNF-) α and inhibited the production of interleukins (IL) 1, 2, 6, 8, and 12, monocyte chemo attractant protein (MCP), and migration inhibitory protein [5155]. Curcumin inhibits inflammatory cytokines through a number of mechanisms, with in vitro studies indicating that curcumin inhibits the activation of certain transcription factors such as activating protein-1 (AP-1) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) in stimulated monocytes and macrophages, thereby blocking cytokine gene expression [56, 57]. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic properties of curcumin are favourable in achieving clinical efficacy. Curcumin crosses the blood-brain barrier and curcumin preparations with enhanced bioavailability (delivered orally) can achieve therapeutic concentrations in the brain [58]. For example, brain levels of the curcuminoids reached concentrations of up to 3 μM for curcumin and up to 6 μM for tetrahydrocurcumin (TC) [59]. These concentrations are indicative of clinical efficacy, since they are in the same range as the tissue concentrations for inhibition of mRNA production of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in vivo, where the EC50 values were determined at 1.2 and 0.701 μM for curcumin and TC, respectively [59].

Lim et al. have tested curcumin for its ability to inhibit the combined inflammatory and oxidative damage in Tg2576 transgenic mice. In this study, Tg2576 mice aged 10 months were fed a curcumin diet (160 ppm) for 6 months. These results indicated that the curcumin diet significantly lowered the levels of oxidised proteins, interleukin- (IL-) 1β, and soluble and insoluble Aβ, in addition to plaque burden [58]. Following on from this work, Yang et al. evaluated the effect of feeding a curcumin diet (500 ppm) to 17-month-old Tg2576 mice for 6 months [60]. When fed to the aged Tg2576 mice with advanced amyloid accumulation, curcumin resulted in reduced soluble amyloid levels and plaque burden [60]. Moreover, the effect of curcumin in the brain was demonstrated by its capability to modulate cholinergic neurotransmission and, consequently, improve cognition deficits and memory impairment in aged rats [61].

So far, large clinical trials with curcumin in AD patients have been lacking. However, one small study conducted in Japan reported some interesting results [62]. In this study, Hishikawa et al. described three patients with AD whose behavioural symptoms improved remarkably as a result of turmeric (the spice containing curcumin as major ingredient) treatment [62]. After 12 weeks of the treatment, the total score of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-brief questionnaire decreased significantly in both acuity of symptoms and burden on caregivers. In one case, the minimental state examination (MMSE) score was up by five points, from 12/30 to 17/30. In the other two cases, no significant change was seen in the MMSE; however, they came to recognize their family within 1 year of treatment. In all cases that had been taking turmeric for more than 1 year reexacerbation of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) was not seen. Though it is a small sample size, the three AD cases treated with turmeric suggest a significant improvement of the cognitive and behavioural symptoms, suggesting a probable benefit in the use of turmeric in individuals with AD for BPSD [62].

The reported in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that curcumin is a suitable compound to target pathways involved in neuroinflammation. However, preparations with enhanced bioavailability need to be developed in order to realize therapeutic concentrations in the human CNS [63].

5.2. Apigenin

Apigenin is a dietary flavonoid found in a wide variety of plants, fruits, and vegetables. This polyphenolic compound is particularly abundant in the ligulate flowers of the chamomile plant and in other sources such as celery, parsley, and grapefruit [64]. Previous investigations of the biological activity of apigenin have demonstrated potent antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antitumorigenic properties [6567]. Evidence from several reports suggests a broad and potent anti-inflammatory activity of apigenin [68, 69]. For example, apigenin has been shown to have inhibitory effects on in vitro releasing of several proinflammatory mediators in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and upregulation of proinflammatory markers in murine and human cell lines. Apigenin strongly decreased levels of IL-6 in LPS activated mouse macrophages [70] and suppressed CD40, TNF-α, and IL-6 production via inhibition of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) induced phosphorylation of STAT1 in murine microglia [71]. Evidence of its anti-inflammatory properties is also demonstrated in studies that show dose-dependent suppression of the inflammatory mediators nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2, through inhibition of iNOS and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in both microglial and macrophage mouse cells [67, 72]. In human cell cultures, apigenin has been demonstrated to attenuate the release of inflammatory cytokines by inactivation of NF-κB, mediated by suppression of LPS-induced phosphorylation of the p65 subunit [73]. Other effects reported for apigenin include decreasing expression of adhesion molecules [74] and its well-known defensive properties against oxidative stress, such as free radical scavenging and increasing intracellular glutathione concentrations [75]. Apigenin is reported to exert many of its effects through interactions with the signaling molecules in the 3 major MAPK pathways (ERK, JNK, and p38) in both murine and human cell culture models [7678].

There are very few studies on apigenin in models of neuroinflammation and/or cognitive decline including AD animal models. One recent study by Zhao et al. tested the neuroprotective effects of apigenin in the APP/PS1 double transgenic AD mouse [79]. Four-month-old mice were treated orally with apigenin (40 mg/kg) for 3 months. Results indicated that apigenin-treated mice displayed improvements in memory and learning deficits and a reduction of fibrillar amyloid deposits with lowered insoluble Aβ concentrations, mediated by a decrease in β-CTF and BACE1. Additionally, the apigenin-treated mice showed restoration of the cortical ERK/CREB/BDNF pathway involved in learning and memory typically affected in AD pathology. Enhanced activities of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase were also observed and increased superoxide anion scavenging [79, 80]. Similarly, in another study A-induced amnesia mouse models were treated with apigenin (20 mg/kg), resulting in improvements in spatial learning and memory, in addition to neurovascular protective effects [79]. Other in vivo studies with non-AD-related animal models report significant reductions in LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-α production in apigenin pretreated mice [70].

Based on the published literature, only one study in humans had been conducted with apigenin with respect to inflammation or cognitive performance. Forty-two patients with AD (12), PD (17), and MS (13) were included in the study; a formulation containing apigenin was administered to them every 12 hours and they were given appointments every three months for a clinical evaluation and a review of general lab analyses. Subjects were submitted to follow-up evaluations between 3 and 24 months (mean: 8.85 ± 5.99 months). Clinical stabilisation was achieved in all the patients (100%) with MS and the scores on the Expanded Disability Status Scale improved in four patients. Clinical stabilisation was achieved in 17 patients (100%) with PD and improvements in the score on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale are in 15 of them. Of the AD patients, 12 attained clinical stabilisation (100%) with an improvement in minimental test in nine cases [81]. In view of the role of oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory processes involved in the pathophysiology of AD, there is evidence to suggest that apigenin is a suitable and promising natural compound to further investigate.

5.3. Tenilsetam

The nootropic drug (±)-3-(2-thienyl)-2-piperazinone (CAS 997, Tenilsetam, Figure 1) has antidementia, antiamnesic, and antihypoxidotic properties. In vivo, Tenilsetam has been assayed in human plasma and urine, where recovery in both media was achieved with endogenous background material separated accurately via a HPLC method [82]. Several pharmacokinetic studies were completed and plasma concentrations were observed over 72 h period. With an initial 150 mg dose, the mean plasma concentration reached a maximum value of 3.39 ± 0.64 μg/mL and the mean urine cumulative recovery was 47.3 ± 3.4%. Tenilsetam was absorbed reasonably fast, showing peak plasma concentrations at 2 hours, which were determined to be dose-dependent. The half-life was determined to be between 18 and 22 hours [83].

In human studies, encephalotropic and psychotropic properties were studied in ten aged subjects using quantitative EEG and psychometric analysis. EEG spectral analysis displayed significant CNS activity caused by tenilsetam, where alpha brain activity increased and delta activity decreased. Time-efficacy calculations showed two pharmacodynamic peaks occurring in the 4th and between the 8th and 24th hour. The lag between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes is consistent with the hypotheses that tenilsetam needs to penetrate the blood-brain barrier [83].

Several mechanisms of action for tenilsetam have been hypothesized. For example, tenilsetam has been shown to be a carbonyl scavenger (e.g., of methylglyoxal) or inhibitor of advanced glycation end-product (AGE) formation [84, 85]. It inhibits AGE-derived amino acid and protein crosslinking in vitro by covalently scavenging toxic reactive carbonyl compounds such as methylglyoxal [8688]. In addition, mounting evidence suggests that the interaction of AGEs with their receptor RAGE perpetuates inflammation and participates actively in various vascular and inflammatory diseases [11, 27, 89, 90]. There are various RAGE ligands including AGEs, S100 proteins, and amphoterins [91, 92]. It is proposed that tenilsetam could exert an indirect anti-inflammatory action by minimizing proinflammatory AGE formation [84, 89].

In vitro experiments with human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, incubated with methylglyoxal which was preincubated with tenilsetam for 2 or 24 hours, tenilsetam completely nullified the toxicity of methylglyoxal at both time points [87]. A few studies have investigated the effect of tenilsetam in humans in regard to memory and cognition. For example, Wesnes et al. [93] examined the influence of tenilsetam on 18 male undergraduates with the hypothesis that tenilsetam would improve cognitive performance in normal conditions and after scopolamine was administered. In an additional study, healthy volunteers () received randomized tenilsetam doses (150, 300, and 900 mg) to study proof of antihypoxidotic activity. Blood gas, EEG, and psychometric results were obtained under hypoxic (9.8% O2) and normoxic (21% O2) conditions. Spectral EEG analysis indicated deterioration in vigilance under the hypoxic conditions, which was attenuated by tenilsetam [94].

Tenilsetam has been used successfully as a treatment in a pilot trial for AD patients. Over a 3-month period at 150 mg/day doses, AD patients showed significant improvements in the favorability judgment task (FJT) and reaction time [95]. The influence of tenilsetam on the P300 response test was also observed with the same dose causing a significant reduction in latency after 4 weeks of treatment [96]. The supporting data surrounding tenilsetam suggest that it would make a suitable compound to test in the GFAP IL-6 mouse to learn more about the drug’s mode of action, about its anti-inflammatory and cognitive enhancing properties, and if it attenuates sustained neuroinflammation and prevents cognitive decline.

6. Conclusion

Dementia, in particular Alzheimer’s disease (AD), poses a substantial challenge to health, aged care, and social policy. Chronic neuroinflammation, demonstrated by the activation of microglia and astrocytes as well as the release of reactive oxygen species and cytokines, has attracted considerable interest in AD over the past decade, not only for its potential role in contributing to neuronal degeneration, but also as a target site for developing potent therapeutics in the future. To investigate the connection between neuroinflammation and AD and to test potential anti-inflammatory drugs, a more suitable “neuroinflammatory” animal model is needed, showing the level of neuroinflammation comparable to the human conditions. Using such animal models, including the GFAP-IL6 mouse line, will allow researchers to investigate the effects of chronic low-grade neuroinflammation on brain structure and function, as well as the effects of anti-inflammatory agents in prevention and recovery.

In this review, we introduced the GFAP-IL6 transgenic mouse, in which the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) is produced by astrocytes under the control of the GFAP promoter, highlighting this as a suitable animal model to study the role of chronic neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration. Previous studies show that these transgenic mice display progressive neurodegeneration in the hippocampal and cerebellar regions and a decline of both cognitive function and motor skills from 6 months of age. It has not been evaluated if the cholinergic system, the neurotransmitter system most affected in AD, is impaired in this model, and it is important to understand if IL-6 induced inflammation may cause cholinergic system degeneration and contribute to cognitive impairment.

Previous studies suggested that curcumin, apigenin, and tenilsetam are promising compounds due to their pharmacokinetic properties and previous success in animal models of familiar AD or in patients. In addition to these three drugs, we anticipate that this animal model can be used to validate a variety of cytokine suppressive anti-inflammatory drugs (CSAIDs) with potential for the prevention and/or treatment of AD from both synthetic and natural sources in the future. The GFAP-IL6 mouse line as animal model of chronic neuroinflammation might be even useful for the investigation and therapeutic intervention relevant for other neuroinflammation related diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, lupus, bipolar disorder, Rasmussen’s encephalitis, and traumatic brain injury, which are all associated with microglial activation and neurodegeneration. Furthermore, we believe that this animal model can serve as a valuable in vivo bioassay for screening of anti-inflammatory drugs, including the class of CSAIDs, and a successful treatment can be monitored by amelioration of inflammation, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Christopher Millington and Sandra Sonego contributed equally to this paper as first authors.


  1. C. P. Ferri, M. Prince, C. Brayne et al., “Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study,” The Lancet, vol. 366, no. 9503, pp. 2112–2117, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. A. Pillai and J. L. Cummings, “Clinical trials in predementia stages of Alzheimer disease,” Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 439–457, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. P. Leifer, “Alzheimer's disease: seeing the signs early,” Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 588–595, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. F. J. Gil-Bea, G. Gerenu, B. Aisa, L. P. Kirazov, R. Schliebs, and M. J. Ramírez, “Cholinergic denervation exacerbates amyloid pathology and induces hippocampal atrophy in Tg2576 mice,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 439–446, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Hardy and D. Allsop, “Amyloid deposition as the central event in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 383–388, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Demuro, M. Smith, and I. Parker, “Single-channel Ca2+ imaging implicates Aβ1-42 amyloid pores in Alzheimer's disease pathology,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 195, no. 3, pp. 515–524, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. I. Goussakov, M. B. Miller, and G. E. Stutzmann, “NMDA-mediated Ca2+ influx drives aberrant ryanodine receptor activation in dendrites of young Alzheimer's disease mice,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 36, pp. 12128–12137, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. R. Robinson, G. M. Bishop, H. Lee, and G. Münch, “Lessons from the AN 1792 Alzheimer vaccine: lest we forget,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 609–615, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. X. Zhu, J. Avila, G. Perry, and M. A. Smith, “Treating the lesions, not the disease,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 170, no. 5, pp. 1457–1459, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. G. Lee, X. Zhu, R. J. Castellani, A. Nunomura, G. Perry, and M. A. Smith, “Amyloid-β in Alzheimer disease: the null versus the alternate hypotheses,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 321, no. 3, pp. 823–829, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Münch, J. Thome, P. Foley, R. Schinzel, and P. Riederer, “Advanced glycation endproducts in ageing and Alzheimer's disease,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 134–143, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. Kuhla, C. Haase, K. Flach, H. J. Lüth, T. Arendt, and G. Münch, “Effect of pseudophosphorylation and cross-linking by lipid peroxidation and advanced glycation end product precursors on tau aggregation and filament formation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 10, pp. 6984–6991, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Goedert, M. G. Spillantini, R. Jakes et al., “Molecular dissection of the paired helical filament,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 325–334, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  14. K. Iqbal, F. Liu, C. X. Gong, C. A. Alonso, and I. Grundke-Iqbal, “Mechanisms of tau-induced neurodegeneration,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 53–69, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Massoud and G. C. Léger, “Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer disease,” The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 579–588, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. Fuller, M. Steele, and G. Münch, “Activated astroglia during chronic inflammation in Alzheimer's disease—do they neglect their neurosupportive roles?” Mutation Research, vol. 690, no. 1-2, pp. 40–49, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Maczurek, K. Hager, M. Kenklies et al., “Lipoic acid as an anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective treatment for Alzheimer's disease,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 60, no. 13-14, pp. 1463–1470, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Maczurek, K. Shanmugam, and G. Münch, “Inflammation and the redox-sensitive AGE-RAGE pathway as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer's disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1126, pp. 147–151, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. Zaborszky and A. Duque, “Local synaptic connections of basal forebrain neurons,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 143–158, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Grothe, L. Zaborszky, M. Atienza et al., “Reduction of basal forebrain cholinergic system parallels cognitive impairment in patients at high risk of developing Alzheimer's disease,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1685–1695, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Zaborszky, A. van den Pol, and E. Gyengesi, “The basal forebrain cholinergic projection system in mice,” in The Mouse Nervous System, C. Watson, G. Paxinos, and L. Puelles, Eds., chapter 28, pp. 684–718, Academic Press, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. Frank, A. Lloyd, J. A. Flynn et al., “Impact of cognitive impairment on mild dementia patients and mild cognitive impairment patients and their informants,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 151–162, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. M. Cullen and G. M. Halliday, “Neurofibrillary degeneration and cell loss in the nucleus basalis in comparison to cortical Alzheimer pathology,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 297–306, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Shinotoh, H. Namba, K. Fukushi, S. Nagatsuka et al., “Progressive loss of cortical acetylcholinesterase activity in association with cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: a positron emission tomography study,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 194–200, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  25. R. Schliebs and T. Arendt, “The cholinergic system in aging and neuronal degeneration,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 555–563, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Grothe, H. Heinsen, and S. Teipel, “Longitudinal measures of cholinergic forebrain atrophy in the transition from healthy aging to Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1210–1220, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. G. Münch, R. Schinzel, C. Loske et al., “Alzheimer's disease—synergistic effects of glucose deficit, oxidative stress and advanced glycation endproducts,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 105, no. 4-5, pp. 439–461, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. Retz, W. Gsell, G. Münch, M. Rösler, and P. Riederer, “Free radicals in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, Supplementum, vol. 54, pp. 221–236, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  29. H. J. Lüth, G. Münch, and T. Arendt, “Aberrant expression of NOS isoforms in Alzheimer's disease is structurally related to nitrotyrosine formation,” Brain Research, vol. 953, no. 1-2, pp. 135–143, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. B. Kuhla, H. J. Lüth, D. Haferburg, K. Boeck, T. Arendt, and G. Münch, “Methylglyoxal, glyoxal, and their detoxification in Alzheimer's disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1043, pp. 211–216, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. H. J. Lüth, V. Ogunlade, B. Kuhla et al., “Age- and stage-dependent accumulation of advanced glycation end products in intracellular deposits in normal and Alzheimer's disease brains,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 211–220, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Cagnin, A. Gerhard, and R. B. Banati, “The concept of in vivo imaging of neuroinflammation with [11C](R)-PK11195 PET,” in Neuroinflammation—From Bench to Bedside, H. Kettenmann, G. A. Burton, and U. J. Moenning, Eds., vol. 39 of Ernst Schering Research Foundation Workshop, pp. 179–191, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. J. Versijpt, F. Dumont, K. J. van Laere et al., “Assessment of neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer's disease with radiolabelled PK11195 and single photon emission computed tomography. A pilot study,” European Neurology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. Bettens, K. Sleegers, and C. van Broeckhoven, “Genetic insights in Alzheimer's disease,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 92–104, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. C. Breitner, L. D. Baker, T. J. Montine et al., “Extended results of the Alzheimer's disease anti-inflammatory prevention trial,” Alzheimer's and Dementia, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 402–411, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. L. Block, L. Zecca, and J. S. Hong, “Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. T. A. Kokjohn and A. E. Roher, “Amyloid precursor protein transgenic mouse models and Alzheimer's disease: understanding the paradigms, limitations, and contributions,” Alzheimer's and Dementia, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 340–347, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Boncristiano, M. E. Calhoun, P. H. Kelly et al., “Cholinergic changes in the APP23 transgenic mouse model of cerebral amyloidosis,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 3234–3243, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  39. H. Li and X. Shen, “Selective loss of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in APP770 transgenic mice,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 113, no. 11, pp. 1040–1042, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  40. H. Johnston, H. Boutin, and S. M. Allan, “Assessing the contribution of inflammation in models of Alzheimer's disease,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 886–890, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Apelt and R. Schliebs, “β-amyloid-induced glial expression of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in cerebral cortex of aged transgenic Tg2576 mice with Alzheimer plaque pathology,” Brain Research, vol. 894, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. L. Bennett, C. Kersaitis, S. L. Macaulay, G. Münch et al., “Vitamin D2-enriched button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) improves memory in both wild type and APPswe/PS1dE9 transgenic mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 10, Article ID e76362, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. I. L. Campbell, C. R. Abraham, E. Masliah et al., “Neurologic disease induced in transgenic mice by cerebral overexpression of interleukin 6,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 21, pp. 10061–10065, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. Valliéres, I. L. Campbell, F. H. Gage, and P. E. Sawchenko, “Reduced hippocampal neurogenesis in adult transgenic mice with chronic astrocytic production of interleukin-6,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 486–492, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  45. I. L. Campbell, “Structural and functional impact of the transgenic expression of cytokines in the CNS,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 840, pp. 83–96, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. I. L. Campbell, “Transgenic mice and cytokine actions in the brain: bridging the gap between structural and functional neuropathology,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 26, no. 2-3, pp. 327–336, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. J. Heyser, E. Masliah, A. Samimi, I. L. Campbell, and L. H. Gold, “Progressive decline in avoidance learning paralleled by inflammatory neurodegeneration in transgenic mice expressing interleukin 6 in the brain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1500–1505, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Hüll, B. L. Fiebich, K. Lieb et al., “Interleukin-6-associated inflammatory processes in Alzheimer's disease: new therapeutic options,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 795–800, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. A. Helmy, M. M. Abdel Naseer, S. El Shafie, and M. A. F. Nada, “Role of interleukin 6 and alpha-globulins in differentiating Alzheimer and vascular dementias,” Neurodegenerative Diseases, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 81–86, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. B. T. Baune, C. Konrad, D. Grotegerd et al., “Interleukin-6 gene (IL-6) a possible role in brain morphology in the healthy adult brain,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 9, pp. 125–135, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. M. Chan, “Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor by curcumin, a phytochemical,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1551–1556, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. N. Chainani-Wu, “Safety and anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin: a component of tumeric (Curcuma longa),” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 161–168, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  53. S. Bengmark, “Curcumin, an atoxic antioxidant and natural NFkappaB, cyclooxygenase-2, lipooxygenase, and inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor: a shield against acute and chronic diseases,” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S. K. Jain, J. Rains, J. Croad, B. Larson, and K. Jones, “Curcumin supplementation lowers TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 secretion in high glucose-treated cultured monocytes and blood levels of TNF-α, IL-6, MCP-1, glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin in diabetic rats,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 241–249, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. E. Hansen, M. Krautwald, A. E. MacZurek et al., “A versatile high throughput screening system for the simultaneous identification of anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective compounds,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 451–464, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. X. K. Tu, W. Z. Yang, J. P. Chen, Y. Chen et al., “Curcumin inhibits TLR2/4-NF-κB signaling pathway and attenuates brain damage in permanent focal cerebral ischemia in rats,” Inflammation, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. A. Nanji, K. Jokelainen, G. L. Tipoe, A. Rahemtulla, P. Thomas, and A. J. Dannenberg, “Curcumin prevents alcohol-induced liver disease in rats by inhibiting the expression of NF-kappa B-dependent genes,” American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. G321–G327, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  58. G. P. Lim, T. Chu, F. Yang, W. Beech, S. A. Frautschy, and G. M. Cole, “The curry spice curcumin reduces oxidative damage and amyloid pathology in an Alzheimer transgenic mouse,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 8370–8377, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  59. A. N. Begum, M. R. Jones, G. P. Lim et al., “Curcumin structure-function, bioavailability, and efficacy in models of neuroinflammation and Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 326, no. 1, pp. 196–208, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. F. Yang, G. P. Lim, A. N. Begum et al., “Curcumin inhibits formation of amyloid β oligomers and fibrils, binds plaques, and reduces amyloid in vivo,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 7, pp. 5892–5901, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. A. Frautschy, W. Hu, P. Kim et al., “Phenolic anti-inflammatory antioxidant reversal of Aβ-induced cognitive deficits and neuropathology,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 993–1005, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. N. Hishikawa, Y. Takahashi, Y. Amakusa et al., “Effects of turmeric on Alzheimer's disease with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia,” Ayu, vol. 33, 4, pp. 499–504, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. K. Tiwari, S. Agarwal, B. Seth, A. Yadav et al., “Curcumin-loaded nanoparticles potently induce adult neurogenesis and reverse cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease model via canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 76–103, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. D. L. McKay and J. B. Blumberg, “A review of the bioactivity and potential health benefits of chamomile tea (Matricaria recutita L.),” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 519–530, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. D. Patel, S. Shukla, and S. Gupta, “Apigenin and cancer chemoprevention: progress, potential and promise (review),” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 233–245, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  66. T. P. Cushnie and A. J. Lamb, “Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 343–356, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. Y. C. Liang, Y. T. Huang, S. H. Tsai, S. Y. Lin-Shiau, C. Chen, and J. Lin, “Suppression of inducible cyclooxygenase and inducible nitric oxide synthase by apigenin and related flavonoids in mouse macrophages,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1945–1952, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. H. Lee, H. Y. Zhou, S. Y. Cho, Y. S. Kim, Y. S. Lee, and C. S. Jeong, “Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of apigenin: inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 expression, adhesion of monocytes to human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and expression of cellular adhesion molecules,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1319–1327, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  69. J. Kowalski, A. Samojedny, M. Paul, G. Pietsz, and T. Wilczok, “Effect of apigenin, kaempferol and resveratrol on the expression of interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α genes in J774.2 macrophages,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 390–394, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  70. A. T. Smolinski and J. J. Pestka, “Modulation of lipopolysaccharide-induced proinflammatory cytokine production in vitro and in vivo by the herbal constituents apigenin (chamomile), ginsenoside Rb(1) (ginseng) and parthenolide (feverfew),” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1381–1390, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. K. Rezai-Zadeh, J. Ehrhart, Y. Bai et al., “Apigenin and luteolin modulate microglial activation via inhibition of STAT1-induced CD40 expression,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 5, pp. 41–51, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. K. Ha, P. Lee, J. A. Park et al., “Apigenin inhibits the production of NO and PGE2 in microglia and inhibits neuronal cell death in a middle cerebral artery occlusion-induced focal ischemia mice model,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 52, no. 4-5, pp. 878–886, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. C. Nicholas, S. Batra, M. A. Vargo et al., “Apigenin blocks lipopolysaccharide-induced lethality in vivo and proinflammatory cytokines expression by inactivating NF-kappaB through the suppression of p65 phosphorylation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 10, pp. 7121–7127, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  74. J. Panés, M. E. Gerritsen, D. C. Anderson, M. Miyasaka, and D. N. Granger, “Apigenin inhibits tumor necrosis factor-induced intercellular adhesion molecule-1 upregulation in vivo,” Microcirculation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 279–286, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  75. M. C. Myhrstad, H. Carlsen, O. Nordstrom, R. Blomhoff, and J. O. Moskaug, “Flavonoids increase the intracellular glutathione level by transactivation of the γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase catalytical subunit promoter,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 386–393, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. S. Shukla and S. Gupta, “Apigenin-induced cell cycle arrest is mediated by modulation of MAPK, PI3K-Akt, and loss of cyclin D1 associated retinoblastoma dephosphorylation in human prostate cancer cells,” Cell Cycle, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1102–1114, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  77. Q. G. Choudhury, D. T. McKay, R. J. Flower, and J. D. Croxtall, “Investigation into the involvement of phospholipases A(2) and MAP kinases in modulation of AA release and cell growth in A549 cells,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 255–265, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  78. R. van Dross, Y. Xue, A. Knudson, and J. C. Pelling, “The chemopreventive bioflavonoid apigenin modulates signal transduction pathways in keratinocyte and colon carcinoma cell lines,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 11, supplement 1, pp. 3800S–3804S, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  79. L. Zhao, J. Wang, R. Liu, X. X. Li, J. Li, and L. Zhang, “Neuroprotective, anti-amyloidogenic and neurotrophic effects of apigenin in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model,” Molecules, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 9949–9965, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. L. Zhao, J. Wang, Y. R. Wang, and X. Z. Fa, “Apigenin attenuates copper-mediated β-amyloid neurotoxicity through antioxidation, mitochondrion protection and MAPK signal inactivation in an AD cell model,” Brain Research, vol. 1492, pp. 33–45, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. E. de Font-Réaulx Rojas and G. Dorazco-Barragán, “Clinical stabilisation in neurodegenerative diseases: clinical study in phase II,” Revista de Neurologia, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 520–528, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  82. J. L. Burrows and F. G. Coppin, “Determination of tenilsetam in human plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography, vol. 529, no. 2, pp. 486–493, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. B. Saletu, J. Grünberger, and H. Cepko, “Pharmacokinetic and -dynamic studies in elderlies with a potential antihypoxidotic/nootropic drug tenilsetam utilizing pharmaco-EEG and psychometry,” Drug Development Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 95–113, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  84. G. Münch, Y. Taneli, E. Schraven et al., “The cognition-enhancing drug tenilsetam is an inhibitor of protein crosslinking by advanced glycosylation,” Journal of Neural Transmission: Parkinson's Disease and Dementia Section, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 193–208, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. J. Thome, J. Kornhuber, G. Münch et al., “A new hypothesis for the etiopathogenesis of the Alzheimer's syndrome. Advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs),” Nervenarzt, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 924–929, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. S. G. de Arriba, G. Stuchbury, J. Yarin, J. Burnell, C. Loske, and G. Münch, “Methylglyoxal impairs glucose metabolism and leads to energy depletion in neuronal cells-protection by carbonyl scavengers,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1044–1050, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. J. Webster, C. Urban, K. Berbaum et al., “The carbonyl scavengers aminoguanidine and tenilsetam protect against the neurotoxic effects of methylglyoxal,” Neurotoxicity Research, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 95–101, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. G. Münch, S. Mayer, J. Michaelis et al., “Influence of advanced glycation end-products and AGE-inhibitors on nucleation-dependent polymerization of β-amyloid peptide,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1360, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. S. Dukic-Stefanovic, R. Schinzel, P. Riederer, and G. Münch, “AGES in the brain ageing: AGE-inhibitors as neuroprotective and anti-dementia drugs?” Biogerontology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–34, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. Heidland, R. Schinzel, K. Sebekova, G. Xiang, G. Münch, and A. Simm, “Advanced glycation endproducts and the kidney,” Przegļd Lekarski, vol. 55, supplement 1, pp. 29–31, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  91. V. Srikanth, A. Maczurek, T. Phan et al., “Advanced glycation endproducts and their receptor RAGE in Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 763–777, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. G. Sajithlal, H. Huttunen, H. Rauvala, and G. Münch, “Receptor for advanced glycation end products plays a more important role in cellular survival than in neurite outgrowth during retinoic acid-induced differentiation of neuroblastoma cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 9, pp. 6888–6897, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. K. Wesnes, P. M. Simpson, and A. Kidd, “The use of a scopolamine model to study the nootropic effects of tenilsetam (CAS 997) in man,” Medical Science Research, vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 1063–1064, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  94. B. Saletu, J. Grunberger, and P. Anderer, “Proof of antihypoxidotic properties of tenilsetam in man by EEG and psychometric analyses under an experimental hypoxic hypoxidoses,” Drug Development Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 135–155, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  95. R. Ihl, I. Perisic, K. Maurer, and T. Dierks, “Effects of 3 months treatment with tenilsetam in patients suffering from dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT),” Journal of Neural Transmission: Parkinson's Disease and Dementia Section, vol. 1, no. 1-2, pp. 84–85, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  96. T. Dierks, K. Maurer, and R. Ihl, “Influence of Tenilsetam on AEP-P300 in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission: Parkinson's Disease and Dementia Section, vol. 1, no. 1-2, p. 49, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Christopher Millington et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles