BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Preventing Hearing Loss and Restoring Hearing: A New Outlook

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 367939 |

M. W. Nishani Dayaratne, Srdjan M. Vlajkovic, Janusz Lipski, Peter R. Thorne, "Kölliker’s Organ and the Development of Spontaneous Activity in the Auditory System: Implications for Hearing Dysfunction", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 367939, 8 pages, 2014.

Kölliker’s Organ and the Development of Spontaneous Activity in the Auditory System: Implications for Hearing Dysfunction

Academic Editor: Jonathan Gale
Received30 May 2014
Accepted07 Aug 2014
Published20 Aug 2014


Prior to the “onset of hearing,” developing cochlear inner hair cells (IHCs) and primary auditory neurons undergo experience-independent activity, which is thought to be important in retaining and refining neural connections in the absence of sound. One of the major hypotheses regarding the origin of such activity involves a group of columnar epithelial supporting cells forming Kölliker’s organ, which is only present during this critical period of auditory development. There is strong evidence for a purinergic signalling mechanism underlying such activity. ATP released through connexin hemichannels may activate P2 purinergic receptors in both Kölliker’s organ and the adjacent IHCs, leading to generation of electrical activity throughout the auditory system. However, recent work has suggested an alternative origin, by demonstrating the ability of IHCs to generate this spontaneous activity without activation by ATP. Regardless, developmental abnormalities of Kölliker’s organ may lead to congenital hearing loss, considering that mutations in ion channels (hemichannels, gap junctions, and calcium channels) involved in Kölliker’s organ activity share strong links with such types of deafness.

1. Introduction

As first described in 1863 by a Swiss anatomist and physiologist Albert von Kölliker, Kölliker’s organ is an epithelial structure present in the developing auditory sensory organ in a wide variety of mammals, including cattle, rabbits, cats, dogs, and humans [1, 2]. It is one of the earliest visible epithelial structures of the developing cochlea and is the source of the sensory cells. After sensory cell differentiation, the residual Kölliker’s organ remains as a large collection of epithelial cells on the medial aspect of the sensory organ, the organ of Corti (named after one of Kölliker’s students, Alfonso Corti), while it is still in its developmental stage. As a transient structure, Kölliker’s organ undergoes extensive remodelling in the embryonic or early postnatal stages and is eventually transformed into the inner sulcus region of the organ of Corti after the sensory structures become sensitive to external sound. Although Kölliker’s organ was described well over a century ago, its function, especially in the period after sensory cell differentiation, is still largely unknown. This review looks at the structure and putative function of Kölliker’s organ, with a major focus on purinergic intercellular signalling in the structure after sensory cell differentiation.

2. Morphology and Transformation

The cochlea develops from its base to apex in a time-dependent manner, both structurally and functionally. In the mouse, the putative sensory epithelium becomes visible around day 14 of gestation (embryonic day 14), when the endolymphatic duct is composed of tall columnar epithelial cells of ectodermal origin surrounded by mesenchymal tissue [3]. This mass of epithelial tissue which gives rise to the sensory IHCs is sometimes referred to as “Kölliker’s organ” in the literature [4]. However, the sensory cell development and differentiation are not the topic of the review. Instead, it will focus on the functional role of Kölliker’s organ after sensory hair cell differentiation and how genetic mutations may lead to abnormal function of this tissue and deafness.

As the sensory structures mature in the cochlea, the epithelium forms two domains starting from around embryonic day 16 (mouse): the greater epithelial ridge (GER) containing Kölliker’s organ lying on its medial aspect and the lesser epithelial ridge (LER) in the lateral portion. The epithelial cells that separate these two regions become the inner and outer pillar cells of the organ of Corti [3]. While IHCs are thought to originate from the GER, the outer hair cells (OHCs) are derived from the LER [4]. The differentiation process between the sensory and nonsensory cells begins without any visibly distinguishable features between the two cell types, as nerve fibres begin to invade specific areas of the GER [5, 6]. Kölliker’s organ in hamsters and other rodents initially appears in the basal turn, along with the lateral wall and Reissner’s membrane, while the apical turn is still in its undifferentiated state [3, 7].

2.1. Structure of the Differentiated Kölliker’s Organ

The differentiated Kölliker’s organ is composed of tightly packed columnar epithelial cells, but due to its dense nature, the nuclei of these cells can be present in different regions of the cells (though mostly in the basal half), giving it a stratified appearance when viewed in cross section [8] (Figure 1). The supporting cells are generally separated by an extracellular space of about 200 Å, while some intercellular spaces measure as little as 30 Å [810]. In kittens, these supporting cells are approximately 65 μm in height 3-4 μm in width, and have microvilli covering their apical or luminal surface. An occasional kinocilium has been observed on the surface of the epithelial cells [8], although others have suggested that all cells within Kölliker’s organ contain kinocilium surrounded by microvilli [10]. In mice, the microvilli are approximately 3-4 μm in length and are present up to 10 days after birth [3]. The cytoplasm at the apical or luminal end of these cells is dense with organelles such as mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and secretory vesicles [11]. Based on their morphological appearance, it was proposed that these cells secrete the tectorial membrane [12], as during early developmental stages (at birth in mice), the tectorial membrane is in contact with Kölliker’s organ through a network of fine filaments, which later detach [3, 8, 10]. The tectorial membrane then extends to the OHC region two weeks after birth [3].

Cells of Kölliker’s organ as well as other supporting cells in the immature organ of Corti are extensively connected through gap junctions, forming a syncytium [13]. Gap junctions are composed of two connexin hemichannels (connexons) from adjacent cells and are made of six subunits, each containing 4 transmembrane regions. These gap junctions are formed before the functional maturation of the cochlea [13] and comprise mainly connexin 26 (Cx26) and connexin 30 (Cx30) subunits (capable of forming heteromeric channels) which share similar expression patterns in Kölliker’s organ epithelial cells in mice and are associated with congenital deafness [6].

2.2. Transformation

As the cochlea matures, columnar cells constituting Kölliker’s organ are replaced by cuboidal cells, which are approximately 10 μm in height, forming the mature inner sulcus [8]. The replacement process increases the intercellular space and greatly reduces the number of cells so that the final number of cuboidal cells is approximately 12% of the original columnar cell count [8]. This transformation occurs in a basal to apical and medial to lateral manner. Although the exact process behind this refinement is unclear, it may involve apoptosis of columnar cells, followed by formation of the inner sulcus containing cuboidal cells, while supporting cells lining the inner hair cells (border cells and phalangeal cells) are maintained through to the mature cochlea [8]. This transformation process appears to be very sensitive to thyroid hormone, as its deficiency leads to prolonged survival of Kölliker’s organ in rats as old as 30 days and the malformed structure of the organ of Corti, particularly the tectorial membrane [11, 14, 15]. Supplementation of thyroid hormone at this age stimulates the transformation of the tall columnar cells of Kölliker’s organ to the cuboidal cells of the inner sulcus [14].

3. Purinergic Signalling in Kölliker’s Organ

Purines have been shown to have considerable influence on the cellular activity in Kölliker’s organ. The actions of adenine compounds on cells and tissues were first described by Drury and Szent-Györgyi in 1929 [16]. However, the term “purinergic signalling” was not introduced until 1972, when adenosine triphosphate (ATP) was recognised as a neurotransmitter, followed by identification of purinergic receptors in 1976 [17]. Purines such as adenosine, ATP, and guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and pyrimidines such as uridine triphosphate (UTP) act as neurotransmitters, gliotransmitters, and paracrine signalling molecules in a variety of sensory systems including vision, smell, taste, and hearing [18]. In the peripheral auditory system, purines have multiple roles, including regulation of cochlear sensitivity and electrochemical homeostasis, synaptic transmission, and signalling between sensory and supporting cells after sensory cell injury [18]. There are two major classes of purinergic receptors, each with multiple subtypes. The P1 receptors (A1, , , and A3) are G protein-coupled and are activated by adenosine. These are further subdivided into receptors which stimulate the production of cyclic AMP ( and ) and those which inhibit its production (A1 and A3). P2 receptors are classified into two major groups, P2X and P2Y (for review, see [19]). The P2X receptors are nonselective ATP-gated ion channels, with high permeability for Na+, K+, and Ca2+. P2X subtypes range from P2X1 to P2X7 with various roles throughout the body. On the other hand, P2Y receptors are G protein-coupled metabotropic receptors, which activate phospholipase C (PLC), resulting in activation of the second messengers diacylglycerol and inositol trisphosphate (IP3). IP3 increases intracellular Ca2+ levels by releasing these ions from internal stores [20]. P2Y receptors can be further subdivided into two groups. The first is mainly coupled to , activating the PLC/IP3 pathway, and includes P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y6, and P2Y11 [21]. The second group consists of P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14 and is coupled to and adenylyl cyclase [22].

3.1. P2 Receptors in the Developing Cochlea

In the developing rat cochlea, P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y6, and P2Y12 receptors are expressed in sensory and nonsensory cells of the organ of Corti and the spiral ganglion neurons [23], although this review focuses on the cells of Kölliker’s organ (for review of receptor expression in IHC and OHC, see [18]). P2Y2 and P2Y4 receptors are localised in cells of the GER [23] and are vital for its function. and the transiently expressed P2X3 contribute to specific innervation of sensory cells by the spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) [24]. During development, both type I and type II SGNs innervate IHCs and OHCs. This is followed in rodents by programmed withdrawal of the type I SGNs from the outer hair cells and the type II fibres from the inner hair cells few days after birth [24]. At this stage, SGNs are supported by neurotrophins secreted by the hair cells, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin 3 [25, 26]. P2X receptor signalling via P2X2/3 receptors inhibits this neurotrophic support [27]. P2X7 receptors are also expressed in hair cells and supporting cells within the cochlea from embryonic stages through to adulthood and are thought to be involved in ion homeostasis as well as apoptosis in the cochlea [28]. P2X1 receptors are transiently expressed during development and are downregulated by postnatal day 10 (P10) in rats, suggesting an involvement of this P2X subunit only in early stages of cochlear development [18, 29]. This may occur through regulation of cell death and differentiation [29].

3.2. Activity in Kölliker’s Organ

Neural connections develop throughout the auditory system during development to form the necessary circuits. This formation and its refinement occur during a stage when there is no sound-driven activity (prior to the “onset of hearing”) in the cochlea. However, there is strong evidence for experience-independent action potentials throughout various regions of the developing auditory circuit, from the cochlear neurons to auditory nuclei in the brain [30, 31]. This is similar to other developing neural circuits, including the spinal cord [32], cerebellum [33], hippocampus [34], and the retina [3539]. The origin of this neural activity was first found to be in the cochlea as tetrodotoxin applied to the round window membrane of the developing avian cochlea resulted in the elimination of neural activity throughout the developing auditory system [36]. The activity, therefore, appears to first begin spontaneously in the cochlea, generating action potentials in the auditory pathways through to the auditory cortex through the activation of IHC and their primary afferent neurons. The electrical activity in the immature auditory cortex thus appears to result from the auditory neural input in the absence of sound. Maintaining activity throughout the auditory circuit in this manner retains and refines the important synaptic connections made during very early development. Although spontaneous electrical activity was first observed in the developing IHCs over a decade ago [40], the link to refinement of the auditory system is only recently starting to emerge [31].

Tritsch et al. [35] identified Kölliker’s organ as the area of the developing organ of Corti that could be responsible for generating the intrinsic spontaneous activity which drives the primary afferent auditory neurons [35]. Clusters (approximately 60 μm wide) of supporting cells of Kölliker’s organ show synchronous spontaneous activity, which could lead to a synchronous event involving adjacent IHCs because of their close proximity [35]. Their work on prehearing rats revealed spontaneous inward currents within epithelial supporting cells of Kölliker’s organ and ruled out the direct involvement of IHCs or neural activity in initiating these events [30, 35, 41]; a finding that has been disputed by later studies [4244] and is discussed in the next section. Furthermore, in the experiments by Tritsch and Bergles, spontaneous activity in supporting cells, IHCs, and SGNs was reduced by P2 purinergic receptor antagonists and extracellular ATP-hydrolysing enzymes (ectonucleotidases), suggesting an involvement of ATP released from Kölliker’s organ and a subsequent activation of P2 receptors in surrounding cells. Predictably, experience-independent neural activity is transient, just like Kölliker’s organ itself (it is only present during the prehearing stages of development). During the earliest stages of development (P0–3), the spontaneously generated currents are smaller, faster, and more frequent when compared to the activity observed later (P7–10) [30].

3.3. Possible Mechanisms of Spontaneous Activity Generation

As mentioned earlier, the possible involvement of purinergic signalling in generation of spontaneous activity in the auditory nerve was first introduced by Tritsch et al., as P2 receptor antagonists such as suramin and pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2′,4′-disulphonate (PPADS) inhibited experience-independent activity [35]. In addition, application of ATP to the epithelial nonsensory cells of Kölliker’s organ resulted in bursts of excitatory postsynaptic currents in primary auditory afferents [30, 35]. Both P2X and P2Y receptors (in particular P2X2, P2X7, and P2Y4) are expressed in the developing organ of Corti, suggesting their likely involvement in ATP-induced currents [23, 41].

It is proposed that release of ATP from Kölliker’s organ may occur through connexin hemichannels expressed extensively in Kölliker’s organ [45, 46]. In particular, this could involve Cx26 and Cx30 which are expressed throughout the organ of Corti, excluding sensory cells [6]. This is supported by the inhibitory effects of gap junction blockers (such as octanol and carbenoxolone) on spontaneous activity as well as the observation of an increase of activity in response to hemichannel opening with Ca2+-free external solutions [30, 46, 47]. It is however important to note that pharmacological studies of such channels or hemichannels lack specificity, limiting their effectiveness in isolating the correct proteins [48]. Pannexins are another candidate for ATP release, as Panx1 and Panx2 are also strongly expressed in supporting cells of the adult cochlea [49], although their expression during development is not clear. Interestingly, genetic loci for the Panx1 gene also contain part of the gene sequence responsible for a dominant form of nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness (DFNA11) [50]. A cochlear organotypic culture study [47] provided further support for connexins as the channels responsible for ATP-induced Ca2+ waves over Panx1 and P2X7, though their work was limited to the outer sulcus [47]. While specific connexin activity has not yet been confirmed, it appears that ATP release in Kölliker’s organ likely occurs through these hemichannels.

Therefore, as first proposed by Tritsch et al., the generation of intrinsic activity in the developing cochlea may include periodic release of ATP from inner supporting cells of Kölliker’s organ, leading to P2 receptor activation at the adjacent IHCs, and subsequent glutamate release [35]. This, in turn, initiates bursts of action potentials in SGNs, connecting spontaneous activity of the cochlea to upstream neural activity in the auditory circuit. Studies carried out on epithelial cells of LER origin indicate that a large portion of Ca2+ rise following purinergic activation occurs from internal stores, as Ca2+ spikes persist in these cells even in Ca2+-free external solution [5154]. Although developed from different domains, this may give an insight into mechanisms behind Ca2+ spikes observed during spontaneous activity generated in Kölliker’s organ. While the rise in intracellular Ca2+ can lead to glutamate release from IHCs, it is also thought to be involved in inducing spontaneous morphological changes within Kölliker’s organ. The ATP-induced activity is likely biphasic, as the P2X receptors respond more rapidly than P2Y receptors [35]. This is evident during the response of supporting cells to the specific P2Y receptor agonist UTP, which is consistently slower than the responses elicited by ATP [35]. Following its release from supporting cells, ATP is likely degraded through the actions of ectonucleotidases (extracellular ATP-hydrolysing enzymes), resulting in generation of adenosine [55]. Although adenosine stimulates P1 (adenosine) receptors in the adult cochlea, it does not have any effect on the spontaneous activity in the developing organ of Corti [35]. The combined action of ATP release through connexins and its continuous degradation in the extracellular space by ectonucleotidases may be responsible for the rhythmic regulation of spontaneous activity. A recent study on adult guinea pigs also suggested the involvement of ATP in mediating gap junctional coupling [56]. This study demonstrated an uncoupling effect on gap junctions by ATP in cochlear supporting cells, an effect mediated by P2X rather than P2Y receptors [56].

In contrast to the purinergic mechanism proposed by Tritsch et al. [35], more recent findings suggest that the initiation of spontaneous activity occurs through IHCs, without ATP-induced depolarisation [4244]. Johnson et al. [43] recorded sustained spontaneous activity from mouse IHCs which was independent from purinergic signalling by Kölliker’s organ. In addition, IHCs still fire spontaneous action potentials in the presence of broadly selective P2 receptor antagonists such as PPADS and suramin and in the absence of the P2X4 receptor subunit [43, 44]. Both studies revealed a modulatory role of the efferent neurotransmitter acetylcholine using α9α10 nicotinic receptor antagonist strychnine [43, 44]. This again challenges the original work by Tritsch et al. [35], which reported no change of spontaneous activity in response to strychnine [35]. The major differences between the purinergic and IHC theory of spontaneous activity generation may be due to variation in ionic compositions (such as K+ concentrations and Ca2+ buffering), which may affect the resting potential of IHCs and therefore their ability to generate action potentials. However, if ATP release by Kölliker’s organ is not responsible for generating spontaneous activity which drives the auditory system prior to the “onset of hearing,” questions remain regarding the role of spontaneous purinergic activity in Kölliker’s organ.

3.4. Rhythmic Morphological Changes within Kölliker’s Organ

Strongly correlated with the onset of inward currents, supporting cells of Kölliker’s organ undergo spontaneous morphological changes where the cytoplasm pulls away from the membrane, resulting in crenation of the cell and increased extracellular space between individual cells. These events are tightly linked as demonstrated by the fact that 93% of optical changes resulting from cell shrinking are correlated with inward currents [35]. This allows real-time visual detection of the spontaneous activity in Kölliker’s organ by recording changes in the optical density/refractive indices of supporting cells involved. Such optical changes occur at a frequency of  Hz and could be observed at random locations within the length of Kölliker’s organ [32]. Morphological changes are relatively specific to Kölliker’s organ but are also observed in the processes of phalangeal cells away from the OHCs [41]. Much like the inward currents, these spontaneously generated morphological changes are also inhibited by nonselective P2 receptor antagonists such as suramin and activated by both ATP and UTP, suggesting a similar purinergic control [30, 35, 41]. Although spontaneous currents and Ca2+ waves are present in Kölliker’s organ from birth in rodents, morphological activity is only observed a few days after birth, indicating that a certain level of development is required to induce changes in cell shape. While low expression of purinergic receptors is a possibility, ATP still induces inward currents and Ca2+ waves in Kölliker’s organ of young rodents, suggesting that the expression levels of purinergic receptors cannot solely account for the lack of morphological changes at these earlier stages [23, 35]. In order to identify the mechanisms of the morphological changes, supporting cells of Kölliker’s organ were depolarised in the presence of high intracellular Ca2+ concentrations. Neither large current injections nor rise in extracellular K+ resulted in the spontaneous morphological changes [41]. In contrast, rises in intracellular Ca2+ alone induced changes in cell diameter of the activated cell as well as adjacent cells. These results indicate that intracellular Ca2+ rise alone can lead to rhythmic morphological changes, which spread to adjacent cells within Kölliker’s organ [41].

A possible mechanism for the changes in cell shape involves the activation of Cl channels or nonselective cation channels by Ca2+, leading to the expulsion of water. It has been suggested that cultured cochlea has the ability to secrete water, providing further support to this theory [57]. Other possibilities include the involvement of contractile proteins such as actin, although there is a lack of evidence to support this. If these morphological changes in the supporting cells do in fact result in the secretion of water, this process may be involved in forming the cochlear compartmental fluids (endolymph and perilymph) during development.

3.5. Calcium Signalling in Kölliker’s Organ

Calcium is a major intracellular messenger in the cochlea, being involved in a number of signalling pathways. Within Kölliker’s organ, a strong correlation was initially observed between spontaneously generated currents, morphological changes, and Ca2+ spikes. This likely occurs through the combined rise in intracellular [Ca2+] from internal stores and inward currents through P2X receptors-channel complexes [30, 35]. The Ca2+ waves in Kölliker’s organ are comparable to those found between groups of astrocytes connected via gap junctions [58]. Each wave is initiated in a small group of cells (one to four) and then spreads radially. Ca2+ waves are also observed within the outer sulcus cells following ATP release or mechanical stimulation [51]. These Ca2+ waves lead to further ATP release, resulting in a regenerative wave that allows the synchronisation of nearby cells [30, 35]. ATP-induced Ca2+ waves can be observed from very early stages of development, with their frequency increasing dramatically (by 5-fold), along with an increase (1.7-fold) of the area of activation [30]. Although extracellular ATP can induce Ca2+ waves throughout Kölliker’s organ at very early stages (P0-P1), naturally occurring Ca2+ waves are rare at that age, possibly due to lower levels of ATP release. The ATP-induced currents are also of smaller amplitudes at that age [30, 41].

Clinically, lack of regular Ca2+ action potentials in IHCs during development could lead to hearing impairment, particularly due to defects in the Ca2+ channel , as its dysfunction is detrimental to cochlear functioning [59]. This particular -type channel is the predominant Ca2+ channel in IHCs of developing cochlea and is responsible for exocytosis of glutamate and potentially of other neurotrophic factors [60]. It is likely that Ca2+ is also involved in rhythmic morphological changes within supporting cells of Kölliker’s organ. One intriguing possibility is that the increase in intracellular Ca2+ within supporting cells can activate Ca2+-activated Cl channels, leading to efflux of Cl. A recent study has demonstrated a strong expression of Ca2+-activated Cl channels (Anoctamin-1) in Kölliker’s organ, particularly in supporting cells immediately adjacent to IHCs [61]. While Anoctamin-1 is thought to be involved in pacemaker activity and fluid secretion in the digestive system [62], its functional significance in Kölliker’s organ is yet to be established. The osmotic gradient created by this Cl efflux could in turn cause the movement of water out of these cells, resulting in morphological changes within Kölliker’s organ [35, 41]. This is supported by the negative effect of Cl channel inhibitor 4,4′diisothiocyano-2,2′stilbene disulfonic acid on spontaneous morphological activity in Kölliker’s organ [41].

4. Kölliker’s Organ and Deafness

The role of Kölliker’s organ is quickly evolving from simply providing support for adjacent IHCs, to potentially initiating activity that is necessary for the development of a fully functional auditory system. While no direct link between Kölliker’s organ dysfunction and deafness has yet been established, critical components of its organisation appear to be linked to major forms of deafness. One of the strongest potential links lies within mutations of the GJB2 gene, which encodes Cx26 and accounts for about 50% of prelingual childhood deafness [63]. Both Cx26 and Cx30 (with strong links to both syndromic and nonsyndromic congenital hearing loss [64, 65]) are highly expressed throughout Kölliker’s organ and are likely to play a key role in generating and transmitting synchronised spontaneous activity. In rodents, mutations and blockers of Cx30 reduce Ca2+ transients within Kölliker’s organ, and the Cx30-null mice also show an elevation of auditory thresholds [66, 67]. Furthermore, channels are essential in creating and maintaining synapses during the critical spontaneous activity driven period of development, and adverse effects are seen as early as the first postnatal week in their absence, starting with OHC degeneration [59].

In addition, the function as well as the transformation of Kölliker’s organ to the inner sulcus is crucial for the maturation of the cochlear structure and function. Thyroid gland deficiencies have been shown to affect this process by maintaining Kölliker’s organ past the onset of hearing, and in humans, impairment of thyroid hormone signalling is associated with hearing loss [6870]. This may be due to malformed structural changes during development, although its exact cause and incidence are still not well characterised (for review, see [71]).

5. Summary

First discovered over a century ago, Kölliker’s organ is present transiently in the developing cochlea, until the cochlea becomes sensitive to external sound. It is an epithelial structure composed of long columnar cells and lies immediately adjacent to IHCs. From this close proximity, epithelial cells of Kölliker’s organ have been suggested to initiate spontaneous electrical activity in the IHCs, driving action potentials in the primary auditory neurons, and auditory nuclei in the brainstem. Although the exact mechanism remains unclear, rhythmic ATP release from connexin hemichannels and activation of purinergic P2 receptors may contribute to rhythmic current/morphological oscillations of Kölliker’s organ. The rise in intracellular Ca2+ or ectonucleotidase activity may act as a feedback for ATP release and thus control the rhythmicity of ATP release in the developing cochlea. Interestingly, both types of ion channels (connexins and P2 receptors) have been linked to hearing loss. Following sound detection by the cochlea (the “onset of hearing”), Kölliker’s organ disappears, transforming into the adult inner sulcus region which contains cuboidal epithelial cells. From a physiological perspective, this is an important step in cochlear adaptation to external environment. From a developmental point of view, purinergic signalling in Kölliker’s organ may provide a sophisticated mechanism central to the tonotopic organisation of the cochlea which starts to develop in the absence of sound.


ATP:Adenosine triphosphate
GER:Greater epithelial ridge
IHCs:Inner hair cells
IP3:Inositol trisphosphate
LER:Lesser epithelial ridge
OHCs:Outer hair cells
PLC:Phospholipase C
SGNs:Spiral ganglion neurons
UTP:Uridine triphosphate.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This study was supported by the Deafness Research Foundation (NZ) and the University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship to Nishani Dayaratne.


  1. V. Hensen, “Zur morphologie der schnecke des menschen und der säugethiere,” Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie, vol. 13, pp. 481–512, 1863. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Kölliker, Handbuch der Gewebelehre des Menschen, Engelmann, 1902.
  3. D. J. Lim and M. Anniko, “Developmental morphology of the mouse inner ear. A scanning electron microscopic observation,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 422, pp. 1–69, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  4. L. Simonneau, M. Gallego, and R. Pujol, “Comparative expression patterns of T-, N-, E-cadherins, β-catenin, and polysialic acid neural cell adhesion molecule in rat cochlea during development: implications for the nature of Kölliker's organ,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 459, no. 2, pp. 113–126, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Pujol, M. Lavigne-Rebillard, and M. Lenoir, “Development of sensory and neural structures in the mammalian cochlea,” in Development of the Auditory System, E. W. Rubel, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay, Eds., vol. 9 of Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, pp. 146–192, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  6. P. Majumder, G. Crispino, L. Rodriguez et al., “ATP-mediated cell-cell signaling in the organ of Corti: the role of connexin channels,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 167–187, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. Giebel and N. Wei, “The early postnatal development of the hamster cochlea,” Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 725–730, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Hinojosa, “A note on development of Corti's organ,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 84, no. 3-4, pp. 238–251, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  9. D. J. Lim and M. Anniko, “Developmental morphology of the mouse inner ear. A scanning electron microscopic observation,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 99, no. 422, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. Zine and R. Romand, “Development of the auditory receptors of the rat: a SEM study,” Brain Research, vol. 721, no. 1-2, pp. 49–58, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Uziel, J. Gabrion, M. Ohresser, and C. Legrand, “Effects of hypothyroidism on the structural development of the organ of Corti in the rat,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 92, no. 5-6, pp. 469–480, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  12. M. Anniko, “Embryogenesis of the mammalian middle ear. III. Formation of the tectorial membrane of the CBA/CBA mouse in vivo and in vitro,” Anatomy and Embryology, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 301–313, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Cohen-Salmon, F. J. del Castillo, and C. Petit, “Connexins responsible for hereditary deafness—the tale unfolds,” in Gap Junctions in Development and Disease, P. D. E. Winterhager, Ed., pp. 111–134, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. Uziel, “Periods of sensitivity to thyroid hormone during the development of the organ of Corti,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 102, no. 429, pp. 23–27, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  15. C. Legrand, A. Bréhier, M. C. Clavel, M. Thomasset, and A. Rabié, “Cholecalcin (28-kDa CaBP) in the rat cochlea. Development in normal and hypothyroid animals. An immunocytochemical study,” Brain Research, vol. 466, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. N. Drury and A. Szent-Györgyi, “The physiological activity of adenine compounds with especial reference to their action upon the mammalian heart,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 213–237, 1929. View at: Google Scholar
  17. G. Burnstock, “Purinergic receptors,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 491–503, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. D. Housley, A. Bringmann, and A. Reichenbach, “Purinergic signaling in special senses,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 128–141, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Burnstock and C. Kennedy, “Is there a basis for distinguishing two types of P2-purinoceptor?” General Pharmacology: The Vascular System, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 433–440, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. P. Abbracchio, G. Burnstock, A. Verkhratsky, and H. Zimmermann, “Purinergic signalling in the nervous system: an overview,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Verkhratsky, “Physiology and pathophysiology of the calcium store in the endoplasmic reticulum of neurons,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 201–279, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. P. Abbracchio, G. Burnstock, J.-M. Boeynaems et al., “International Union of Pharmacology LVIII: update on the P2Y G protein-coupled nucleotide receptors: from molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology to therapy,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 281–341, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L.-C. Huang, P. R. Thorne, S. M. Vlajkovic, and G. D. Housley, “Differential expression of P2Y receptors in the rat cochlea during development,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 231–248, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L.-C. Huang, D. Greenwood, P. R. Thorne, and G. D. Housley, “Developmental regulation of neuron-specific P2X3 receptor expression in the rat cochlea,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 484, no. 2, pp. 133–143, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Mou, C. L. Hunsberger, J. M. Cleary, and R. L. Davis, “Synergistic effects of BDNF and NT-3 on postnatal spiral ganglion neurons,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 386, no. 4, pp. 529–539, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. U. Pirvola and J. Ylikoski, “Neurotrophic factors during inner ear development,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 57, pp. 207–223, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  27. D. Greenwood, D. J. Jagger, L. Huang et al., “P2X receptor signaling inhibits BDNF-mediated spiral ganglion neuron development in the neonatal rat cochlea,” Development, vol. 134, no. 7, pp. 1407–1417, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. Nikolic, G. D. Housley, and P. R. Thorne, “Expression of the P2X7 receptor subunit of the adenosine 5′-triphosphate-gated ion channel in the developing and adult rat cochlea,” Audiology & Neuro-Otology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  29. P. Nikolic, G. D. Housley, L. Luo, A. F. Ryan, and P. R. Thorne, “Transient expression of P2X1 receptor subunits of ATP-gated ion channels in the developing rat cochlea,” Developmental Brain Research, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 173–182, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. N. X. Tritsch and D. E. Bergles, “Developmental regulation of spontaneous activity in the Mammalian cochlea,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1539–1550, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. L. Johnson, S. Kuhn, C. Franz et al., “Presynaptic maturation in auditory hair cells requires a critical period of sensory-independent spiking activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 21, pp. 8720–8725, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. T. Landmesser and M. J. O'Donovan, “Activation patterns of embryonic chick hind limb muscles recorded in ovo and in an isolated spinal cord preparation,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 347, pp. 189–204, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  33. A. J. Watt, H. Cuntz, M. Mori, Z. Nusser, P. J. Sjöström, and M. Häusser, “Traveling waves in developing cerebellar cortex mediated by asymmetrical Purkinje cell connectivity,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 463–473, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Y. Ben-Ari, E. Cherubini, R. Corradetti, and J.-L. Gaiarsa, “Giant synaptic potentials in immature rat CA3 hippocampal neurones,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 416, pp. 303–325, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  35. N. X. Tritsch, E. Yi, J. E. Gale, E. Glowatzki, and D. E. Bergles, “The origin of spontaneous activity in the developing auditory system,” Nature, vol. 450, no. 7166, pp. 50–55, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. W. R. Lippe, “Rhythmic spontaneous activity in the developing avian auditory system,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1486–1495, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  37. T. A. Jones, S. M. Jones, and K. C. Paggett, “Primordial rhythmic bursting in embryonic cochlear ganglion cells,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 8129–8135, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. Sonntag, B. Englitz, C. Kopp-Scheinpflug, and R. Rübsamen, “Early postnatal development of spontaneous and acoustically evoked discharge activity of principal cells of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body: an in vivo study in mice,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 30, pp. 9510–9520, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. N. Dale, “Dynamic ATP signalling and neural development,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 586, no. 10, pp. 2429–2436, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. J. Kros, J. P. Ruppersberg, and A. Rüsch, “Expression of a potassium current inner hair cells during development of hearing in mice,” Nature, vol. 394, no. 6690, pp. 281–284, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. N. X. Tritsch, Y. Zhang, G. Ellis-Davies, and D. E. Bergles, “ATP-induced morphological changes in supporting cells of the developing cochlea,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 155–166, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. L. Johnson, H. J. Kennedy, M. C. Holley, R. Fettiplace, and W. Marcotti, “The resting transducer current drives spontaneous activity in prehearing mammalian cochlear inner hair cells,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 31, pp. 10479–10483, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. L. Johnson, T. Eckrich, S. Kuhn et al., “Position-dependent patterning of spontaneous action potentials in immature cochlear inner hair cells,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 711–717, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. G. Sendin, J. Bourien, F. Rassendren, J.-L. Puel, and R. Nouvian, “Spatiotemporal pattern of action potential firing in developing inner hair cells of the mouse cochlea,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 1999–2004, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Forge, D. Becker, S. Casalotti, J. Edwards, N. Marziano, and G. Nevill, “Gap junctions in the inner ear: comparison of distribution patterns in different vertebrates and assessement of connexin composition in mammals,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 467, no. 2, pp. 207–231, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. H. B. Zhao, “Connexin26 is responsible for anionic molecule permeability in the cochlea for intercellular signalling and metabolic communications,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1859–1868, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. F. Anselmi, V. H. Hernandez, G. Crispino et al., “ATP release through connexin hemichannels and gap junction transfer of second messengers propagate Ca2+ signals across the inner ear,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 48, pp. 18770–18775, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. D. C. Spray, Z. C. Ye, and B. R. Ransom, “Functional connexin “hemichannels”: a critical appraisal,” Glia, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 758–773, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. X. Wang, M. Streeter, Y. Liu, and H. Zhao, “Identification and characterization of pannexin expression in the mammalian cochlea,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 512, no. 3, pp. 336–346, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. Tamagawa, K. Kitamura, T. Ishida et al., “A gene for a dominant form of non-syndromic sensorineural deafness (DFNA11) maps within the region containing the DFNB2 recessive deafness gene,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 849–852, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. E. Gale, V. Piazza, C. D. Ciubotaru, and F. Mammano, “A mechanism for sensing noise damage in the inner ear,” Current Biology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 526–529, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. V. Piazza, C. D. Ciubotaru, J. E. Gale, and F. Mammano, “Purinergic signalling and intercellular Ca2+ wave propagation in the organ of Corti,” Cell Calcium, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. F. Ashmore and H. Ohmori, “Control of intracellular calcium by ATP in isolated outer hair cells of the guinea-pig cochlea,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 428, pp. 109–131, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  54. L. Lagostena, J. F. Ashmore, B. Kachar, and F. Mammano, “Purinergic control of intracellular communication between Hensen's cells of the guinea-pig cochlea,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 531, no. 3, pp. 693–706, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. M. Vlajkovic, P. R. Thorne, G. D. Housley, D. J. B. Muñoz, and I. S. Kendrick, “Ecto-nucleotidases terminate purinergic signalling in the cochlear endolymphatic compartment,” NeuroReport, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1559–1565, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  56. Y. Zhu and H. Zhao, “ATP activates P2X receptors to mediate gap junctional coupling in the cochlea,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 426, no. 4, pp. 528–532, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. H. M. Sobkowicz, J. M. Loftus, and S. M. Slapnick, “Tissue culture of the organ of Corti,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 502, pp. 3–36, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  58. T. A. Fiacco and K. D. McCarthy, “Astrocyte calcium elevations: properties, propagation, and effects on brain signaling,” Glia, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 676–690, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. R. Glueckert, G. Wietzorrek, K. Kammen-Jolly et al., “Role of class D L-type Ca2+ channels for cochlear morphology,” Hearing Research, vol. 178, no. 1-2, pp. 95–105, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Brandt, J. Striessnig, and T. Moser, “CaV1.3 channels are essential for development and presynaptic activity of cochlear inner hair cells,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 34, pp. 10832–10840, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  61. E. Yi, J. Lee, and C. Lee, “Developmental role of anoctamin-1/TMEM16A in Ca2+-dependent volume change in supporting cells of the mouse Cochlea,” Experimental Neurobiology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 322–329, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  62. S. J. Hwang, P. J. A. Blair, F. C. Britton et al., “Expression of anoctamin 1/TMEM16A by interstitial cells of Cajal is fundamental for slow wave activity in gastrointestinal muscles,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 587, no. 20, pp. 4887–4904, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. B. Hochman, T. L. Stockley, D. Shipp, V. Y. W. Lin, J. M. Chen, and J. M. Nedzelski, “Prevalence of Connexin 26 (GJB2) and Pendred (SLC26A4) mutations in a population of adult cochlear implant candidates,” Otology and Neurotology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 919–922, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Y. Sun, W. Tang, Q. Chang, Y. Wang, W. Kong, and X. Lin, “Connexin30 null and conditional connexin26 null mice display distinct pattern and time course of cellular degeneration in the cochlea,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 516, no. 6, pp. 569–579, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. Y. Takada, L. Beyer, D. Swiderski et al., “Connexin 26 null mice exhibit spiral ganglion degeneration that can be blocked by BDNF gene therapy,” Hearing Research, vol. 309, pp. 124–135, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  66. M. Schütz, P. Scimemi, P. Majumder et al., “The human deafness-associated connexin 30 T5M mutation causes mild hearing loss and reduces biochemical coupling among cochlear non-sensory cells in knock-in mice,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 19, no. 24, pp. 4759–4773, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. L. Rodriguez, E. Simeonato, P. Scimemi et al., “Reduced phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate synthesis impairs inner ear Ca2+ signaling and high-frequency hearing acquisition,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 35, pp. 14013–14018, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. Vanderschueren-Lodeweyckx, F. Debruyne, L. Dooms, E. Eggermont, and R. Eeckels, “Sensorineural hearing loss in sporadic congenital hypothyroidism,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 419–422, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. F. Brucker-Davis, M. C. Skarulis, A. Pikus et al., “Prevalence and mechanisms of hearing loss in patients with resistance to thyroid hormone,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 2768–2772, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. F. W. Newell and K. R. Diddie, “Typical monochromacy, congenital deafness, and resistance to intracellular action of thyroid hormone (author's transl),” Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 731–734, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  71. L. Ng, M. W. Kelley, and D. Forrest, “Making sense with thyroid hormone-the role of T 3 in auditory development,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 296–307, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 M. W. Nishani Dayaratne et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.