BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 409272 |

Dongjun Luo, Zhongxia Wang, Junyi Wu, Chunping Jiang, Junhua Wu, "The Role of Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 409272, 11 pages, 2014.

The Role of Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Academic Editor: Jingmin Zhao
Received22 Mar 2014
Accepted06 Jun 2014
Published02 Jul 2014


Hypoxia is a common feature of many solid tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hypoxia can promote tumor progression and induce radiation and chemotherapy resistance. As one of the major mediators of hypoxic response, hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) has been shown to activate hypoxia-responsive genes, which are involved in multiple aspects of tumorigenesis and cancer progression, including proliferation, metabolism, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis and therapy resistance. It has been demonstrated that a high level of HIF-1 in the HCC microenvironment leads to enhanced proliferation and survival of HCC cells. Accordingly, overexpression, of HIF-1 is associated with poor prognosis in HCC. In this review, we described the mechanism by which HIF-1 is regulated and how HIF-1 mediates the biological effects of hypoxia in tissues. We also summarized the latest findings concerning the role of HIF-1 in the development of HCC, which could shed light on new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of HCC.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. In recent decades, HCC is characterized by poor prognosis and recurrence after liver resection. With advances in the development of molecular-targeted drugs, a lot of new diagnostic and therapeutic molecular targets may provide novel therapies in HCC [2].

HCC shares the character of tissue hypoxia with other solid tumors, especially when the tumor grows quickly and angiogenesis fails to catch up with the speed of tumor growth. On one hand, hypoxia induces tumor necrosis which limits the size of HCC. However, on the other hand, tough hypoxic environment leads HCC cells to turn on hypoxia response, which subsequently leads to prosurvival reactions, elevated angiogenesis, adapted metabolic alteration, tumor invasion, and metastasis [3]. Hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is the first identified mediator of cell response to hypoxia in mammalian cells cultured under reduced oxygen tension [4]. This transcription factor is a heterodimer composed of two subunits: an oxygen-sensitive HIF-1α and a constitutively expressed HIF-1β which is also called aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT). Both HIF-1 subunits contain the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) and PER-ARNT-SIM (PAS) domains that are required for dimerization and combination with their corresponding DNA sequences, namely, hypoxia response element (HRE) in the promoter region of target genes [5]. HIF-1α has two independent transactivation domains located in its COOH-terminal portion: the NH2-terminal transactivation domain (N-TAD) and the COOH-terminal transactivation domain (C-TAD) [6]. The N-TAD constitutes the degradation box and is involved in the stabilization of HIF-1α, and the C-TAD functions in modulating the transcriptional activation of HIF-1α under hypoxic conditions. Under normoxia, the inhibitory domain (ID) located between the two TADs negatively regulates the activity of the protein. The oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODDD) is required for degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway under normoxic conditions (Figure 1).

This review focuses on the activities that HIF-1 exerts in HCC, paying close attention to small-molecule inhibitors of the HIF-1 pathway as well as the recent progress of gene therapy aimed directly at HIF-1 genes.

2. Regulation and Target Genes of HIF-1

2.1. The Degradation and Stability of HIF-1

Under normoxic conditions, posttranslational HIF-1α is rapidly degraded by the proteasome and usually not detectable. In the absence of other metabolic perturbations, proline residues 402 and 564 at the ODDD of HIF-1α are hydroxylated by prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs). Hydroxylation of these two prolyl residues mediates binding of von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor protein (pVHL), which is the recognition component of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that targets HIF-1α for ubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome [7] (Figure 2). In this process of degradation, three PHDs (PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3) are considered as the oxygen sensors regulating HIF-1α. These three homologs are identified recently in mammals and have the potential to hydroxylate HIF-1α. Among them, PHD2 has been shown to be the key limiting enzyme setting the low steady-state levels of HIF-1α in normoxia [8]. The activity of PHD2 is governed by the oxygen concentration within the cell, and the reaction converting proline into hydroxyproline also requires iron, 2-oxoglutarate, and ascorbate. Under hypoxic conditions, the inactivation of PHDs frees HIF-1α form hydroxylation, preventing pVHL binding to prolyl residues, which leads to HIF-1α stabilization in the cytoplasm. Based on the oxygen-dependent pVHL pathway, ARD1 (arrest defective 1) has been shown as a HIF-1α acetyltransferase stimulating HIF-1α degradation through the acetylation of Lys532, which enhances interaction of HIF-1α with pVHL [9].

In addition to the pVHL pathway, the primary mechanism by which HIF-1α keeps stable, some signaling proteins such as small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 (SUMO-1) and RWD-containing sumoylation enhancer (RSUME) also can control levels of HIF-1α. The ectopic expression of SUMO-1 increases HIF-1α stability and enhances its transcriptional activity by the cotransfection study, suggesting that sumoylation at Lys(391) and Lys(477) residues in the ODDD modulates other posttranslational modifications of HIF-1α [10]. RSUME is induced under hypoxia and promotes the sumoylation of HIF-1α, leading to its enhanced stabilization and transcriptional activity [11]. On the contrary, new evidence demonstrates that SUMO-specific protease 1 is essential for stabilization of HIF-1α during hypoxia, indicating that sumoylation can also target HIF-1α for ubiquitination and degradation [12].

Another pVHL-independent pathway for degradation of HIF-1α involves receptor of activated protein kinase C (RACK1) and heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90). As a HIF-1α-interacting protein, RACK1 promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of HIF-1α through recruitment of the Elongin-C/B ubiquitin ligase complex, whereas Hsp90 upregulates HIF-1α protein stability through competition with RACK1 for binding to the PAS domain of HIF-1α, which predicts that Hsp90 antagonists may promote loss of HIF-1α protein [13, 14].

2.2. The Transcriptional Activity of HIF-1

Hypoxia allows HIF-1α to escape recognition by the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex and translocate from cytoplasm to the nucleus. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of HIF-1α regulates its transcriptional activity by the classical nuclear transport receptors importin α/β, which directly interact with HIF-1α dependent on a functional nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the C-terminal region of HIF-1α. In contrast, the supposed NLS in the N-terminal region is not effective [15].

Under the effect of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, HIF-1α would be directly phosphorylated, so that it can accumulate in the nucleus and is free to form heterodimer with HIF-1β. Subsequently, the C-TAD of HIF-1α is able to interact with transcriptional coactivators such as p300/CBP, resulting in increased HIF-1 transactivation after binding to HREs on the target genes (Figure 2). But under normoxic conditions, this interaction cannot occur in the nucleus due to the hydroxylation of the asparagines-803 residue at the C-terminal TAD by an asparaginyl hydroxylase termed factor inhibiting HIF-1 (FIH-1). FIH-1 contains certain motifs present in iron and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases and blocks the binding of p300/CBP to HIF-1, leading to the cease of HIF-1-mediated gene transcription. However, under hypoxic conditions, the activity of FIH-1 is directly limited, allowing the interaction between HIF-1 and p300/CBP [16]. Since the activity of HIF-1 is regulated by two oxygen-dependent hydroxylation events, the PHDs have been shown to be more effective as oxygen sensors than the FIH-1 according to the differences between FIH and PHDs in their Michaelis constant values for oxygen and inhibition by 2-oxoglutarate analogs [17]. Furthermore, the in vitro study has shown that prolyl hydroxylation is substantially more sensitive than asparaginyl hydroxylation in the order of Pro (402) > Pro (564) > Asn (803) at the three sites in HIF-1α proteins [18].

2.3. The Target Genes of HIF-1

The HIF-1 complex acts as a transcription factor for many target genes in several aspects of cancer progression including angiogenesis, erythropoiesis, glucose metabolism, cell proliferation, and apoptosis [19, 20] (Table 1). Among these genes, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the major target genes for HIF-1 that directly participates in angiogenesis [21]. However, HIF-1 contributes to angiogenesis by more complex mechanisms through the production of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), endothelin-1 (ET-1), stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), angiopoietin 2 (ANGPT2), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), leptin, and so forth than simple VEGF induction [2227]. In addition to the activation of gene expression for angiogenesis, another essential process of cancer biology that HIF-1 activates is glucose metabolism. HIF-1 regulates the expression of many enzymes in the glycolytic pathway, which allows tumors to survive under hypoxia by metabolizing glucose to lactate through anaerobic glycolysis [2830]. HIF-1 activates the glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), which mediates cellular glucose uptake, as well as hexokinase (HK) and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), which convert pyruvate to lactate. Regulated by HIF-1, the lactate can be removed from the cell through the action of monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) while pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1) and MAX interactor 1 (MXI1) can block the flow of pyruvate into the mitochondria [3136]. Several hypoxia-induced growth factors, most notably insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF-2), transforming growth factor (TGF), C-MYC, and inhibitor of differentiation 2 (ID2), which are known to promote cell proliferation, are also HIF-1 target genes [3740]. In contrast, HIF-1 also leads to cell growth arrest and apoptosis through upregulating the expression of several target genes such as p53, BNIP3, and Caspase 3 [4143]. Furthermore, hypoxia unleashes the invasive and metastatic potential of tumor cells. HIF-1 regulates the expression of genes encoding matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), fibronectin 1 (FN1), C-MET, autocrine motility factor (AMF), and keratins 14 (KRT14), which play established roles in the pathophysiology of invasion [4448].

Effect on cancer progressionTarget genes of HIF-1References

AngiogenesisVEGF, NOS, ET1, SDF1, ANGPT2, PDGF, leptin[2127]
Glucose metabolismGLUT1, HK, LDHA, MCT4, PDK1, MXI1[3136]
Cell proliferation NOS, IGF-2, TGF, C-MYC, ID2[22, 3740]
Cell apoptosisp53, BNIP3, Caspase 3[4143]
Invasion and metastasisMMP2, FN1, C-MET, AMF, KRT14[4448]

3. Role of HIF-1 in HCC

3.1. HIF-1 and Cellular Proliferation and Apoptosis

Compelling evidence indicates that HIF-1 expression is intimately correlated with proliferation and apoptosis of cancer cells. However, the role of HIF-1 on cellular proliferation and apoptosis of hepatoma cells remains controversial. In most cases, HIF-1 acts as an antiapoptotic factor. In the work by Xia and coworkers, it is illustrated that Forkhead box M1 (FoxM1) acts as a proliferation-specific transcription factor in cell growth of HCC and HIF-1 directly binds to the FoxM1 promoter induced by tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), which suggests that the TNF-α/HIF-1-induced upregulation of FoxM1 expression may promote the proliferation of hepatoma cells and their resistance to apoptosis [49]. By using a Tet-on inducible system to regulate HIF-1α expression in the HepG2 cells in vitro under hypoxia; Xu and coworkers showed that HIF-1 promotes cell proliferation and accelerates the cell cycle through influencing the expression of cyclin A and cyclin D. Moreover, the assay of caspase activity indicates that HIF-1 suppresses hepatocellular cell apoptosis by upregulating survivin and Bcl-2 expression [50]. Several studies have demonstrated that primary hepatocellular carcinoma needs Omi/HtrA2 expression for cell apoptosis and HIF-1 inhibits the apoptotic process in HCC cells through upregulating Bcl-2 expression to impede Omi/HtrA2 releasing from the mitochondrion [51, 52]. In another work by Jeon and coworkers, the role of HIF-1 is demonstrated in the mechanism of sulforaphane (SFN)-induced apoptosis in human hepatoma cells. SFN downregulates the expression of HIF-1α, which may strongly inhibit 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase4 (PFKFB4), a bifunctional enzyme increasing glucose uptake and glycolytic capacity of cancer cells [53].

In contrast, recent studies suggest that HIF-1 can also act as a proapoptotic factor [54, 55]. BNIP3 is a known HIF-1 target gene that has been implicated in mitochondrial autophagy induced by hypoxia, which indicates the proapoptotic function of HIF-1 [54]. In addition, p53 is considered to be the most common inhibitor of cellular proliferation as well as inducer of apoptosis. When cells sense a decrease in oxygen availability, HIF-1 can enhance the stability of p53 and these two transcription factors cooperate with each other to induce apoptosis [55].

3.2. HIF-1 and Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessel, is essential for cancer progression. It has been shown that antiangiogenic therapy is effective in the treatment of HCC [56]. VEGF, the most potent angiogenic molecule, participates specifically in promoting vascular endothelial cell division, proliferation, and migration. Under hypoxia, HIF-1 has been proven to be a direct transcriptional activator of VEGF pathway. Currently, the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib is still the only approved drug for patients with advanced HCC and it has been demonstrated that the mechanisms that account for the antiangiogenic efficiency of sorafenib is associated with its inhibitory effect on the expression of HIF-1 and VEGF proteins, leading to a decrease in vascularization of HCC [57]. Wang et al. reported that in an experimental rat HCC model, after twenty weeks of hepatocarcinogenesis induction, the levels of HIF-1 and VEGF significantly increased, suggesting that HIF-1 and VEGF play critical roles in HCC, possibly through promoting angiogenesis [58]. Besides this, another report has also shown that acriflavine, a drug inhibiting dimerization and transcriptional activity of HIF-1, decreases the expression of VEGF, leading to potent inhibitory effects on tumor vascularization [59].

In addition to VEGF, HIF-1 also induces the expression of other angiogenic growth factors such as stromal derived factor 1 (SDF1), angiopoietin 2 (ANGPT2), placental growth factor (PGF), platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B), and stem cell factor (SCF) [60, 61]. However, further studies are warranted to further validate the effects of HIF-1 on the angiogenesis of HCC in hypoxic state to confirm the possibility of HIF-1 as a therapeutic target in HCC.

3.3. HIF-1 and Invasion and Metastasis

The occurrence of intrahepatic and extrahepatic tumor cell metastasis is the primary factor causing poor prognosis of patients with HCC. Invasion and metastasis consist of a series of steps and the initiation involves the acquisition of a motile phenotype by tumor cells in a process called epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Thereafter, EMT has functional requirement for loss of E-cadherin, which is a major component of the adhesion junctions that maintain epithelial integrity and polarity [62]. Several lines of evidence strongly indicate that HIF-1 may be a master regulator of EMT by upregulating transcription repressors of E-cadherin, such as Snail, Twist1, transcription factor 3 (TCF3), Zfhx1a, and Zfhx1b [6365]. HIF-1 has been shown to promote invasion and metastasis of HCC through inducing EMT in hypoxic state. The possible associated molecular mechanism is that HIF-1 interacts with two HREs in promoter of Snail and upregulates the expression of Snail to indirectly affect levels of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and Vimentin [66].

In addition, the degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) including basement membrane is another key step in tumor metastasis and this complex multistep process has been proved to be associated with matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), especially MMP-2 and MMP-9 [67, 68]. When tumors encounter low oxygen tension, HIF-1 acts as a transcription factor upregulating the expression of MMPs in both mRNA and protein levels [69, 70]. In contrast, silencing of HIF-1 inhibits cellular metastasis through alteration of invasion-related enzymes such as MMP-2 and MMP-9, both of which are decreased with the introduction of HIF-1α small interfering RNA (siRNA) [71].

In patients with HCC, lymph node metastasis (LNM) as a way of tumor metastasis is closely related to a low survival rate. Xiang et al. identified 83 cancer genes that were differentially expressed in 20 pairs of HCC patients with or without LNM and found that the combination of intratumoral HIF-1α, VEGF, and MMP-2 may be a molecular model for predicting LNM of HCC patients [72]. Furthermore, knockdown of HIF-1α expression by adenovirus-mediated small hairpin RNA (shRNA) inhibits the angiogenesis and invasion in HCC cells and as a result, the levels of VEGF and MMP-2 are also repressed in endothelial cells transferred to the tumor [73]. Angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4), another target gene of HIF-1, promotes transendothelial migration of HCC cells in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, serum ANGPTL4 is higher in HCC patients compared with healthy control, which indicates that ANGPTL4 may be a novel prognostic marker in HCC patients [74]. In another work by Liu and coworkers, the homeobox protein PROX1 is demonstrated to be a critical factor promoting HCC metastasis, and its prometastasis activity is significantly associated with the upregulation of HIF-1α transcription and stabilization, which subsequently induces an EMT response in HCC cells [75]. Additionally, Zhang and coworkers also reported that β-catenin enhances hypoxia-induced invasion capacity in HCC cell lines by increasing the EMT-associated activity of HIF-1α [76].

3.4. HIF-1 and Resistance to Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy

Radiotherapy is an established treatment for HCC patients by killing tumor cells via induction of oxidative stress. However, radiotherapy resistance is initiated owing to producing less oxygen-free radicals in the hypoxia region of tumor. Among these mechanisms of radiotherapy resistance, the HIF-1 pathway has a profound effect on the tumor-protective response to radiotherapy via increasing the antioxidant capacity of tumors to counter the oxidative stress after irradiation [77]. The consequences of postirradiation HIF-1 activation are complex, involving both vascular protection and changing of glucose metabolism. On the one hand, upregulation of HIF-1 stimulates tumor cells to produce VEGF and other proangiogenic factors during radiotherapy, which protect the microvasculature from radiation-induced endothelial apoptosis. On the other hand, recent researches show that HIF-1 inhibition results in metabolic alterations that could enhance the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy [78, 79]. Based on the work by Yang et al., HIF-1 downregulation by siRNA enhances radiosensitivity in chemical hypoxic HCC cells in vitro suggesting that radiotherapy in combination with specific inhibition of HIF-1 would be expected to have a stronger anticancer effect on human hepatoma [80]. In the clinical research which evaluates the relationship between HIF-1 and responses of abdominal metastatic lymph nodes from HCC patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), it is illustrated that HIF-1 expression in primary HCC is correlated with radiotherapy response and clinical outcome [81].

The hypoxic environment plays a critical role in promoting resistance to anticancer drugs, and the expression of HIF-1 may serve as a biomarker for better understanding of chemoresistance in cancer treatment through inducing hypoxia-elicited multiple drug resistance (MDR1) gene and increasing the expression of P-glycoprotein, a transmembrane protein associated with tumor resistance to chemotherapeutics [82]. There is recent evidence that HIF-1 is upregulated in response to doxorubicin and HIF-1-targeting strategies may enhance efficacy of doxorubicin, which is frequently used to treat many cancers including HCC [83]. Zhu et al. have elucidated the molecular mechanism by which multidrug resistance of HCC develops. Their study provided the evidence that HIF-1 controls the transcription of MDR-related genes in HepG2 cells [84]. In addition, Tung et al. found that HIF-1 acts as a major role in the acquisition of arsenic trioxide (ATO) resistance in human HCC. HIF-1-induced drug-resistance of ATO highlights the potential importance of HIF-1 as a prime molecular target to reverse ATO resistance in HCC [85].

3.5. HIF-1 and Prognosis

As a common malignant solid tumor, HCC is characterized by poor prognosis and treatment options are largely limited by the frequent presence of metastases. It is observed that aberrant HIF-1 activation in HCC cells is associated with the development and prognosis of HCC. It has been found that HIF-1α expression is detected in the sera of HCC patients at a significantly higher level than in cases of benign liver disease, suggesting that circulating HIF-1α level is a new biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of HCC [86]. In the study by Simon and coworkers, HIF-1α was determined by quantitative RT-PCR in HCC tissue and paired nonmalignant liver tissue of 53 patients surgically treated for HCC. They concluded that the dysregulation of HIF-1α in apparently nonmalignant liver tissue provides a modulated environment that potentially enhances HCC recurrence after curative resection [87]. Dai et al. have investigated the expression of HIF-1 in HCC and correlated the level of HIF-1 with poor outcome. The authors found that HIF-1 in HCC plays an important role in predicting patient outcome and their study identified a potential novel mechanism contributing to prognosis of HCC [88].

In summary, higher level of HIF-1 expression might indicate a poorer prognosis in patients with HCC, and HIF-1 could be used as a novel useful biomarker for the prediction of prognosis of HCC patients. However, the conclusion is hampered by the limitations of the included studies. Further studies evaluating the significance of HIF-1 for prognosis of HCC are strongly recommended [89, 90].

4. HIF-1 in the Therapy of HCC

4.1. The Application of HIF-1 Inhibitors

Given the central role of HIF-1 in the activation of numerous pathways responsible for tumorigenesis and progression of HCC, it is not surprising that targeting HIF-1 has become a novel therapeutic strategy. Increasing small molecules have been found to inhibit HIF-1 activity through various mechanisms including decrease of mRNA transcription, downregulation of protein synthesis, and disrupting HIF-1 stabilization, inhibition of subunit heterodimerization, interference of HIF-1-DNA binding, and transcriptional activity attenuation of HIF-1 [91, 92]. Many of these agents targeting HIF-1 are already in clinical trials. For instance, YC-1(3-(5′-hydroxymethyl-2′-furyl)-1-benzyl indazole) is a potent inhibitor of HIF-1 via stimulation of FIH dependent p300 dissociation from HIF-1α [93]. It has been found that YC-1 effectively inhibits the migration of HCC cells through decreasing HIF-1 levels and the expression of downstream target genes, which implies that YC-1 has potential as a multipurpose anticancer drug and is worthwhile to develop for the prevention of tumor spreading [94].

In recent years, growing number of HIF-1 inhibitors are found as potential HCC therapeutic drug leads. As mentioned earlier, HIF-1 plays a significant role in HCC chemotherapy resistance and thereby limits the efficiency of sorafenib, which is the only approved targeted small molecular drug for HCC therapy. EF24, a curcumin analog, has been shown to synergistically enhance sorafenib efficacy for HCC patients through overcoming sorafenib resistance by upregulating VHL protein level and inhibiting HIF-1. This result indicates that EF24 in combination with sorafenib represents a promising strategy for the treatment of HCC [95]. A recent study shows that conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) inhibits HIF-1α stabilization in the HepG2 cell line and induces apoptotic cell death under hypoxic condition. This is the first report of the inhibitory effect of CLA on HIF-1α stabilization. Further detailed mechanisms of this compound remain to be elucidated [96]. Tanaka and his colleagues reported that LS081, with iron-facilitating activity, is capable of inhibiting Hep3B and HepG2 growth in vitro and in vivo through accelerating the degradation of HIF-1 via prolyl hydroxylases. LS081 itself did not show cytotoxic effects on cell growth in vitro. Therefore, treatment with LS081 might be a novel approach for HIF-1-targeting treatment in cancer [97]. Using New Zealand White rabbits implanted with VX2 liver tumor, Liang et al. found that HIF-1α protein is significantly overexpressed in transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) treated liver tumors, and 10-hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT), a HIF-1α inhibitor, is demonstrated to have an inhibitory effect on HIF-1α expression that subsequently inhibits angiogenesis of liver tumors after TAE treatment. These results suggested that transcatheter infusion of HCPT after TAE treatment might have a better therapeutic effect against HCC [98100].

In conclusion, several HIF-1 inhibitors have been demonstrated as potential HCC therapeutic drug. However, further investigations are needed before this strategy can be translated into clinical application.

4.2. HIF-1 Gene Therapy

Gene therapy, the modification of gene expression to treat diseases, has become a tremendous area of research to provide therapeutic benefits against cancers over the past 20 years. Due to the crucial role of HIF-1 for tumor growth in HCC, HIF-1 becomes a novel molecular target for gene therapy using nucleic acids, such as DNA, siRNA, shRNA and antisense oligonucleotides (ASON). These nucleic acids are delivered to target cells to modify the expression of HIF-1 and are hoped to exert anti-HCC activity by targeting HIF-1.

RNA interference (RNAi) is a gene regulation mechanism mediated by some relevant RNA molecules such as siRNA and shRNA. siRNA or shRNA is able to achieve a reliable and sequence-specific gene silencing by binding to corresponding mRNA sequences and activating a biochemical pathway leading to degradation of the mRNA, thus blocking the translation of the target mRNA into specific protein. In addition, composed of 20–24 nucleotides, microRNAs (miRNAs) also utilize the same biological machinery and regulate protein-coding gene expression, usually resulting in gene silencing [101104]. A recent study has shown that silencing of HIF-1α gene using specific siRNA can significantly inhibit the proliferation of hypoxic CBRH-7919 rat hepatoma cells by inactivation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. In the study, the researchers demonstrate that HIF-1α silencing using siRNAs could be a potential gene therapy for anticancer treatment [105]. Chen and coworkers demonstrated that RNAi against HIF-1α could improve the efficacy of TAE and reduce undesirable effects in the treatment of HCC by TAE through suppressing VEGF and the microvessel density (MVD). Thus, the combination of RNAi of HIF-1α and TAE had a marked synergistic effect on tumor growth inhibition [106].

Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) technique is another approach widely used in gene therapy. The antisense single-strand DNA or RNA can identify the regions of mRNA and inhibit the expression of target genes. Studies have confirmed that HIF-1 antisense oligonucleotide is able to inhibit the HCC cell proliferation by reducing the gene expression and protein synthesis of HIF-1. The findings suggested that antisense technique targeting HIF-1 might be an effective gene therapy of HCC [107]. Moreover, Liu et al. have demonstrated that gene transfer of antisense HIF-1α downregulates the expression of HIF-1α as well as VEGF to inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis, thereby enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin towards HCC. In summary, antisense HIF-1α therapy has promising utility in the treatment of HCC [108].

5. Conclusion and Perspectives

In conclusion, multitudinous studies have provided compelling evidence that HIF-1 plays important roles in many critical aspects of HCC tumorigenesis, progression, and metastasis. It is involved in cellular proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Clinical data also indicate that HIF-1 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis of HCC. More importantly, HIF-1 is identified as a potential target for HCC therapy. Thus, some small-molecular inhibitors of the HIF-1 pathway have been used in combination with other therapies to improve anticancer efficacy. Despite the different approaches to identify HIF-1 pathway inhibitors that effectively inhibit liver cancer tumorigenesis, there are some limitations in the application of these agents, such as the undesirable side effects, the relatively low specificity, less obvious antitumor effects, and the lack of clinical efficacy evaluation. Thus, further studies are warranted to discover optimal therapeutic agents targeting HIF-1 for improved clinical outcomes.

HIF-1 has also been demonstrated to provide a novel target for gene therapy in HCC treatment. However, a number of questions that have yet to be answered hinder the current development of RNAi technique targeting HIF-1. Even though clinical trials are undergoing, the unassured safety of RNAi and its potential to induce unwanted immune response are issues of common concern. At the same time, effective delivery of RNA molecules is another hurdle for the RNAi-based HCC therapy. Recently, many exciting studies have improved the efficiency and selectivity of siRNA delivery utilizing viral or nonviral delivery systems mainly cationic liposomes or nanoparticles and thereby increased the confidence in the potential of HIF-1 RNAi for fighting HCC. We believe that further studies remain to be done to elucidate the important role of HIF-1 in HCC and there is still a long way to go before we can confidently promote the clinical application of HIF-1 targeting therapy for HCC.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Dongjun Luo and Zhongxia Wang contributed equally to this work.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. NSFC30801417); the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (no. BK2009010); the Doctoral Fund of the Ministry of Education of China (no. RFDP200802841004); the Key Project supported by Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Nanjing Department of Health (no. ZKX12030); and the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Nanjing University (no. 2013CL14).


  1. S. Lin, K. Hoffmann, and P. Schemmer, “Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review,” Liver Cancer, vol. 1, no. 3-4, pp. 144–158, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Moeini, H. Cornellà, and A. Villanueva, “Emerging signaling pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Liver Cancer, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–93, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  3. S. J. Myung and J. Yoon, “Hypoxia in hepatocellular carcinoma,” The Korean journal of hepatology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  4. G. L. Semenza and G. L. Wang, “A nuclear factor induced by hypoxia via de novo protein synthesis binds to the human erythropoietin gene enhancer at a site required for transcriptional activation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 5447–5454, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  5. B. Jiang, E. Rue, G. L. Wang, R. Roe, and G. L. Semenza, “Dimerization, DNA binding, and transactivation properties of hypoxia- inducible factor 1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 30, pp. 17771–17778, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Li, H. P. Ko, and J. P. Whitlock Jr., “Induction of phosphoglycerate kinase 1 gene expression by hypoxia. Roles of Arnt and HIF1alpha,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 35, pp. 21262–21267, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. G. Kaelin Jr., “Proline hydroxylation and gene expression,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 74, pp. 115–128, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Berra, E. Benizri, A. Ginouvès, V. Volmat, D. Roux, and J. Pouysségur, “HIF prolyl-hydroxylase 2 is the key oxygen sensor setting low steady-state levels of HIF-1α in normoxia,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 4082–4090, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Jeong, M. Bae, M. Ahn et al., “Regulation and destabilization of HIF-1alpha by ARD1-mediated acetylation,” Cell, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 709–720, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Bae, J. Jeong, J. A. Park et al., “Sumoylation increases HIF-1α stability and its transcriptional activity,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 324, no. 1, pp. 394–400, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Carbia-Nagashima, J. Gerez, C. Perez-Castro et al., “RSUME, a small RWD-containing protein, enhances SUMO conjugation and stabilizes HIF-1alpha during hypoxia,” Cell, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 309–323, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Cheng, X. Kang, S. Zhang, and E. T. H. Yeh, “SUMO-specific protease 1 is essential for stabilization of HIF1α during hypoxia,” Cell, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 584–595, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. V. Liu, J. H. Baek, H. Zhang, R. Diez, R. N. Cole, and G. L. Semenza, “RACK1 competes with HSP90 for binding to HIF-1α and is required for O2-independent and HSP90 inhibitor-induced degradation of HIF-1α,” Molecular Cell, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 207–217, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. S. Isaacs, Y. Jung, E. G. Mimnaugh, A. Martinez, F. Cuttitta, and L. M. Neckers, “Hsp90 regulates a von Hippel Lindau-independent hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha-degradative pathway,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 33, pp. 29936–29944, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Depping, A. Steinhoff, S. G. Schindler et al., “Nuclear translocation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs): involvement of the classical importin α/β pathway,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1783, no. 3, pp. 394–404, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. S. Hewitson, L. A. McNeill, M. V. Riordan et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) asparagine hydroxylase is identical to factor inhibiting HIF (FIH) and is related to the cupin structural family,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 29, pp. 26351–26355, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. Koivunen, M. Hirsilä, V. Günzler, K. I. Kivirikko, and J. Myllyharju, “Catalytic properties of the asparaginyl hydroxylase (FIH) in the oxygen sensing pathway are distinct from those of its prolyl 4-hydroxylases,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 11, pp. 9899–9904, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. M. Tian, K. K. Yeoh, M. K. Lee et al., “Differential sensitivity of hypoxia inducible factor hydroxylation sites to hypoxia and hydroxylase inhibitors,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 15, pp. 13041–13051, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. S. Hong, H. Lee, and K. W. Kim, “HIF-1alpha: a valid therapeutic target for tumor therapy,” Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 343–353, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. K. Burroughs, S. Kaluz, D. Wang, K. Wang, E. G. Van Meir, and B. Wang, “Hypoxia inducible factor pathway inhibitors as anticancer therapeutics,” Future Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 553–572, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. J. Hicklin and L. M. Ellis, “Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1011–1027, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. Melillo, T. Musso, A. Sica, L. S. Taylor, G. W. Cox, and L. Varesio, “A hypoxia-responsive element mediates a novel pathway of activation of the inducible nitric oxide synthase promoter,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 182, no. 6, pp. 1683–1693, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Hu, D. J. Discher, N. H. Bishopric, and K. A. Webster, “Hypoxia regulates expression of the endothelin-1 gene through a proximal hypoxia-inducible factor-1 binding site on the antisense strand,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 245, no. 3, pp. 894–899, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. J. Ceradini, A. R. Kulkarni, M. J. Callaghan et al., “Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1,” Nature Medicine, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 858–864, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. P. Simon, R. Tournaire, and J. Pouyssegur, “The angiopoietin-2 gene of endothelial cells is up-regulated in hypoxia by a HIF binding site located in its first intron and by the central factors GATA-2 and Ets-1,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 217, no. 3, pp. 809–818, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Huang, R. P. Hickey, J. L. Yeh et al., “Cardiac myocyte-specific HIF-1alpha deletion alters vascularization, energy availability, calcium flux, and contractility in the normoxic heart,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1138–1140, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Grosfeld, J. André, S. H. de Mouzon, E. Berra, J. Pouysségur, and M. Guerre-Millo, “Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 transactivates the human leptin gene promoter,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 45, pp. 42953–42957, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. L. Semenza, “HIF-1: upstream and downstream of cancer metabolism,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. L. Semenza, “Regulation of cancer cell metabolism by hypoxia-inducible factor 1,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. N. C. Denko, “Hypoxia, HIF1 and glucose metabolism in the solid tumour,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 705–713, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. Chen, N. Pore, A. Behrooz, F. Ismail-Beigi, and A. Maity, “Regulation of glut1 mRNA by hypoxia-inducible factor-1: interaction between H-ras and hypoxia,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 12, pp. 9519–9525, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. P. Mathupala, A. Rempel, and P. L. Pedersen, “Glucose catabolism in cancer cells: identification and characterization of a marked activation response of the type II hexokinase gene to hypoxic conditions,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 46, pp. 43407–43412, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. D. Firth, B. L. Ebert, and P. J. Ratcliffe, “Hypoxic regulation of lactate dehydrogenase A. Interaction between hypoxia-inducible factor I and cAMP response elements,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 36, pp. 21021–21027, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. S. Ullah, A. J. Davies, and A. P. Halestrap, “The plasma membrane lactate transporter MCT4, but not MCT1, is up-regulated by hypoxia through a HIF-1α-dependent mechanism,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 14, pp. 9030–9037, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. W. Kim, I. Tchernyshyov, G. L. Semenza, and C. V. Dang, “HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 177–185, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. Zhang, P. Gao, R. Fukuda et al., “HIF-1 inhibits mitochondrial biogenesis and cellular respiration in VHL-deficient renal cell carcinoma by repression of C-MYC activity,” Cancer Cell, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 407–420, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. Feldser, F. Agani, N. V. Iyer, B. Pak, G. Ferreira, and G. L. Semenza, “Reciprocal positive regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and insulin-like growth factor 2,” Cancer Research, vol. 59, no. 16, pp. 3915–3918, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  38. L. H. Chang, S. L. Pan, C. Y. Lai, A. Tsai, and C. Teng, “Activated PAR-2 regulates pancreatic cancer progression through ILK/HIF-α-induced TGF-α expression and MEK/VEGF-a-mediated angiogenesis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 566–575, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Koshiji, Y. Kageyama, E. A. Pete, I. Horikawa, J. C. Barrett, and L. E. Huang, “HIF-1alpha induces cell cycle arrest by functionally counteracting Myc,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1949–1956, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. Löfstedt, A. Jögi, M. Sigvardsson et al., “Induction of ID2 expression by hypoxia-inducible factor-1. A role in dedifferentiation of hypoxic neuroblastoma cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 38, pp. 39223–39231, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. F. Ladelfa, M. F. Toledo, J. E. Laiseca, and M. Monte, “Interaction of p53 with tumor suppressive and oncogenic signaling pathways to control cellular reactive oxygen species production,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1749–1761, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Z. C. Song, W. Zhou, R. Shu, and J. Ni, “Hypoxia induces apoptosis and autophagic cell death in human periodontal ligament cells through HIF-1α pathway,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 239–248, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Volm and R. Koomägi, “Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) and its relationship to apoptosis and proliferation in lung cancer,” Anticancer Research, vol. 20, no. 3 A, pp. 1527–1533, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  44. Y. Ben-Yosef, N. Lahat, S. Shapiro, H. Bitterman, and A. Miller, “Regulation of endothelial matrix metalloproteinase-2 by hypoxia/reoxygenation,” Circulation Research, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 784–791, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. H. Ryu, H. M. Park, J. Chung, C. H. Lee, and H. R. Park, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α mediates oral squamous cell carcinoma invasion via upregulation of α5 integrin and fibronectin,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 393, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Pennacchietti, P. Michieli, M. Galluzzo, M. Mazzone, S. Giordano, and P. M. Comoglio, “Hypoxia promotes invasive growth by transcriptional activation of the met protooncogene,” Cancer Cell, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 347–361, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. H. Niizeki, M. Kobayashi, I. Horiuchi et al., “Hypoxia enhances the expression of autocrine motility factor and the motility of human pancreatic cancer cells,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 1914–1919, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. B. Krishnamachary, S. Berg-Dixon, B. Kelly et al., “Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1138–1143, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  49. L. Xia, P. Mo, W. Huang et al., “The TNF-α/ROS/HIF-1-induced upregulation of foxMI expression promotes HCC proliferation and resistance to apoptosis,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2250–2259, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Z. Xu, E. Liu, C. Peng et al., “Role of hypoxia-inducible-1alpha in hepatocellular carcinoma cells using a Tet-on inducible system to regulate its expression in vitro,” Oncology Reports, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 573–578, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Z. Xu, X. Chen, J. Niu, E. Liu, C. Li, and C. Peng, “The prognostic significance of Omi/HtrA2 expression, and correlation between Omi/HtrA2 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in primary hepatocellular carcinoma cells,” Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 49–52, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  52. Z. Xu, X. Chen, C. Peng et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-α suppressed hepatocellular carcinoma cell apoptosis through influencing on Omi/HtrA2 expression and its releasing from the mitochondrion,” Oncology Research, vol. 20, no. 5-6, pp. 213–220, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Y. K. Jeon, D. R. Yoo, Y. H. Jang, S. Y. Jang, and M. J. Nam, “Sulforaphane induces apoptosis in human hepatic cancer cells through inhibition of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase4, mediated by hypoxia inducible factor-1-dependent pathway,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1814, no. 10, pp. 1340–1348, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. H. Zhang, M. Bosch-Marce, L. A. Shimoda et al., “Mitochondrial autophagy is an HIF-1-dependent adaptive metabolic response to hypoxia,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 16, pp. 10892–10903, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. Sermeus and C. Michiels, “Reciprocal influence of the p53 and the hypoxic pathways,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 2, no. 5, article e164, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. W. Welker and J. Trojan, “Antiangiogenic treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: the balance of efficacy and safety,” Cancer Management and Research, vol. 5, pp. 337–347, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  57. L. Liu, R. L. K. Ho, G. G. Chen, and P. B. S. Lai, “Sorafenib inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha synthesis: implications for antiangiogenic activity in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 20, pp. 5662–5671, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. W. Wang, G. Xu, W. D. Jia et al., “Expression and correlation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density in experimental rat hepatocarcinogenesis,” Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 417–425, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. Lee, H. Zhang, D. Z. Qian, S. Rey, J. O. Liu, and G. L. Semenza, “Acriflavine inhibits HIF-1 dimerization, tumor growth, and vascularization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 42, pp. 17910–17915, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. Rey and G. L. Semenza, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent mechanisms of vascularization and vascular remodelling,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 236–242, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. J. W. Kim, “Hypoxia-inducible factor 1, hepatocellular carcinoma and angiogenesis.,” The Korean journal of hepatology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 278–279, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. X. Lu and Y. Kang, “Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors: master regulators of metastasis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 16, no. 24, pp. 5928–5935, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. T. Imai, A. Horiuchi, C. Wang et al., “Hypoxia attenuates the expression of E-cadherin via up-regulation of SNAIL in ovarian carcinoma cells,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 1437–1447, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M.-H. Yang, M.-Z. Wu, S.-H. Chiou et al., “Direct regulation of TWIST by HIF-1alpha promotes metastasis,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 295–305, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. B. Krishnamachary, D. Zagzag, H. Nagasawa et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent repression of E-cadherin in von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor-null renal cell carcinoma mediated by TCF3, ZFHX1A, and ZFHX1B,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2725–2731, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. L. Zhang, G. Huang, X. Li et al., “Hypoxia induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition via activation of SNAI1 by hypoxia-inducible factor -1α in hepatocellular carcinoma,” BMC Cancer, vol. 13, article 108, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. H. Sato, Y. Kida, M. Mai et al., “Expression of genes encoding type IV collagen-degrading metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in various human tumor cells,” Oncogene, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  68. I. Okazaki and Y. Inagaki, “Novel strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma based on MMPs science,” Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 753–763, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. Y. Ding, C. W. Kreipke, P. Schafer, S. Schafer, S. L. Speirs, and J. A. Rafols, “Synapse loss regulated by matrix metalloproteinases in traumatic brain injury is associated with hypoxia inducible factor-1α expression,” Brain Research, vol. 1268, pp. 125–134, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. O. J. Erdozain, S. Pegrum, V. R. Winrow, M. Horrocks, and C. R. Stevens, “Hypoxia in abdominal aortic aneurysm supports a role for HIF-1α and Ets-1 as drivers of matrix metalloproteinase upregulation in human aortic smooth muscle cells,” Journal of Vascular Research, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 163–170, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. S. Fujiwara, K. Nakagawa, H. Harada et al., “Silencing hypoxia-inducible factor-1α inhibits cell migration and invasion under hypoxic environment in malignant gliomas,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 793–802, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  72. Z. L. Xiang, Z. C. Zeng, J. Fan, Z. Tang, H. Zeng, and D. Gao, “Gene expression profiling of fixed tissues identified hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, VEGF, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 as biomarkers of lymph node metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 17, no. 16, pp. 5463–5472, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. S. H. Choi, H. W. Shin, J. Y. Park et al., “Effects of the knockdown of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha expression by adenovirus-mediated shRNA on angiogenesis and tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines,” The Korean Journal of Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 280–287, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. Charlton and M. D. Leise, “Corrections: hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-activated angiopoietin-like protein 4 contributes to tumor metastasis via vascular cell adhesion molecule-1/integrin β1 signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, vol. 54, no. 6, article 2280, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. Y. Liu, J. B. Zhang, Y. Qin et al., “PROX1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by way of up-regulating hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression and protein stability,” Hepatology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 692–705, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. Q. Zhang, X. Bai, W. Chen et al., “Wnt/β-catenin signaling enhances hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma via crosstalk with hif-1α signaling,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 962–973, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. M. Yoshimura, S. Itasaka, H. Harada, and M. Hiraoka, “Microenvironment and radiation therapy,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 685308, 13 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. D. L. Schwartz, J. Bankson, L. Bidaut et al., “HIF-1-dependent stromal adaptation to ischemia mediates in vivo tumor radiation resistance,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 259–270, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. T. W. Meijer, J. H. Kaanders, P. N. Span, and J. Bussink, “Targeting hypoxia, HIF-1, and tumor glucose metabolism to improve radiotherapy efficacy,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 20, pp. 5585–5594, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. W. Yang, T. Sun, J. Cao, and S. Fan, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α downregulation by small interfering RNA inhibits proliferation, induces apoptosis, and enhances radiosensitivity in chemical hypoxic human hepatoma SMMC-7721 cells,” Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 565–571, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. Z. Xiang, Z. Zeng, J. Fan et al., “The expression of HIF-1α in primary hepatocellular carcinoma and its correlation with radiotherapy response and clinical outcome,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 2021–2029, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. K. M. Comerford, T. J. Wallace, J. Karhausen, N. A. Louis, M. C. Montalto, and S. P. Colgan, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent regulation of the multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 3387–3394, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  83. Y. Cao, J. M. Eble, E. Moon et al., “Tumor cells upregulate normoxic HIF-1α in response to doxorubicin,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 20, pp. 6230–6242, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. H. Zhu, S. Luo, J. Wang et al., “Effect of environmental factors on chemoresistance of HepG2 cells by regulating hypoxia-inducible factor-1α,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 1095–1103, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. J.-N. Tung, Y.-W. Cheng, C.-H. Hsu et al., “Normoxically overexpressed hypoxia inducible factor 1-alpha is involved in arsenic trioxide resistance acquisition in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1492–1500, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. S. Li, D. Yao, L. Wang et al., “Expression characteristics of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and its clinical values in diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatitis Monthly, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 821–828, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  87. F. Simon, M. Bockhorn, C. Praha et al., “Deregulation of HIF1-alpha and hypoxia-regulated pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma and corresponding non-malignant liver tissue-influence of a modulated host stroma on the prognosis of HCC,” Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, vol. 395, no. 4, pp. 395–405, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. C. Dai, Q. Gao, S. Qiu et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha, in association with inflammation, angiogenesis and MYC, is a critical prognostic factor in patients with HCC after surgery,” BMC Cancer, vol. 9, article 418, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. S. Zheng, X. Chen, X. Yin, and B. Zhang, “Prognostic significance of HIF-1a expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e65753, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. S. Cao, S. Yang, C. Wu et al., “Protein expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha and hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review with meta-analysis,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, vol. S2210-7401, no. 14, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  91. N. Sadri and P. J. Zhang, “Hypoxia-inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression; prognostic and therapeutic targets in soft tissue sarcomas,” Cancers, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 320–333, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. G. L. Semenza, “Hypoxia-inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 207–214, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. H. L. Shan, H. S. Dong, Y. Chun, K. L. Myung, M. Kim, and J. Park, “A novel mode of action of YC-1 in HIF inhibition: stimulation of FIH-dependent p300 dissociation from HIF-1α,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 3729–3738, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. D. H. Shin, J. Kim, Y. Jung et al., “Preclinical evaluation of YC-1, a HIF inhibitor, for the prevention of tumor spreading,” Cancer Letters, vol. 255, no. 1, pp. 107–116, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. Y. Liang, T. Zheng, R. Song et al., “Hypoxia-mediated sorafenib resistance can be overcome by EF24 through Von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor-dependent HIF-1α inhibition in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1847–1857, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. Yamasaki, T. Nagatomo, T. Matsuyama et al., “Conjugated linoleic acids inhibit hypoxia inducible factor-1α stabilization under hypoxic condition in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells,” Journal of Oleo Science, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 491–496, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. H. Tanaka, Z. Li, K. Ikuta et al., “Iron facilitator LS081 reduces hypoxia-inducible factor-1α protein and functions as anticancer agent in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Science, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 767–774, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. B. Liang, C. Zheng, G. Feng et al., “Correlation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α with angiogenesis in liver tumors after transcatheter arterial embolization in an animal model,” CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 806–812, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. B. Liang, C. Zheng, G. Feng et al., “Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in liver tumors after transcatheter arterial embolization in an animal model,” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology—Medical Science, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 776–781, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. B. Liang, C. Zheng, G. Feng et al., “Experimental evaluation of inhibitory effect of 10-hydroxycamptothecin on hypoxia-inducible factor-1α expression and angiogenesis in liver tumors after transcatheter arterial embolization,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1565–1572, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. H. R. Mollaie, S. H. Monavari, and S. A. Arabzadeh, “RNAi and miRNA in viral infections and cancers,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 7045–7056, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  102. J. M. Lee, T. J. Yoon, and Y. S. Cho, “Recent developments in nanoparticle-based siRNA delivery for cancer therapy,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 782041, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. E. Callegari, B. K. Elamin, S. Sabbioni et al., “Role of microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical perspective,” OncoTargets and Therapy, vol. 6, pp. 1167–1178, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. K. Uchino, T. Ochiya, and F. Takeshita, “RNAi therapeutics and applications of microRNAs in cancer treatment,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 596–607, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. Y. Wu, L. Xu, J. Ni, H. Sun, and Y. Chen, “Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α silencing on the proliferation of cbrh-7919 hepatoma cells,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1749–1759, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. C. Chen, J. Wang, R. Liu, and S. Qian, “RNA interference of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha improves the effects of transcatheter arterial embolization in rat liver tumors,” Tumour Biology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1095–1103, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. C. WeiXing, H. Tiantian, N. Qun, Y. Chaohui, and X. Ping, “Inhibitory effect of Hypoxia inducible factor-1 antisense oligonucleotide on growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells,” Medical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 88–92, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. F. Liu, P. Wang, X. Jiang et al., “Antisense hypoxia-inducible factor 1α gene therapy enhances the therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin to combat hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Science, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 2055–2061, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Dongjun Luo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.