BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Recent Development in Production and Biotechnological Application of Microbial Enzymes

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 506287 |

Bhupender Sharma, Sukhdev Singh, Shamsher S. Kanwar, "L-Methionase: A Therapeutic Enzyme to Treat Malignancies", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 506287, 13 pages, 2014.

L-Methionase: A Therapeutic Enzyme to Treat Malignancies

Academic Editor: Noomen Hmidet
Received25 Feb 2014
Revised16 Jul 2014
Accepted12 Aug 2014
Published31 Aug 2014


Cancer is an increasing cause of mortality and morbidity throughout the world. L-methionase has potential application against many types of cancers. L-Methionase is an intracellular enzyme in bacterial species, an extracellular enzyme in fungi, and absent in mammals. L-Methionase producing bacterial strain(s) can be isolated by 5,5′-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) as a screening dye. L-Methionine plays an important role in tumour cells. These cells become methionine dependent and eventually follow apoptosis due to methionine limitation in cancer cells. L-Methionine also plays an indispensable role in gene activation and inactivation due to hypermethylation and/or hypomethylation. Membrane transporters such as GLUT1 and ion channels like Na2+, Ca2+, K+, and Cl become overexpressed. Further, the α-subunit of ATP synthase plays a role in cancer cells growth and development by providing them enhanced nutritional requirements. Currently, selenomethionine is also used as a prodrug in cancer therapy along with enzyme methionase that converts prodrug into active toxic chemical(s) that causes death of cancerous cells/tissue. More recently, fusion protein (FP) consisting of L-methionase linked to annexin-V has been used in cancer therapy. The fusion proteins have advantage that they have specificity only for cancer cells and do not harm the normal cells.

1. Introduction

L-Methionine-γ-lyase (EC; MGL), also known as methionase, methioninase, L-methionine-γ-demethiolase, and L-methionine methanethiol-lyase (deaminating), is a pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) dependent enzyme. PLP reduces the energy for conversion of amino acids to a zwitterionic carbonion [1] and substantially the apoenzyme catalyzes the cleavage of substrate bond yielding the product [2]. MGL is a cytosolic enzyme inducibly formed by addition of L-methionine to the culture medium [3]. MGL has a molecular weight (Mr) of about 149 kDa to 173 kDa and consists of four subunits with identical Mr of about 41 kDa to 45 kDa each except MGL purified to homogeneity from Pseudomonas putida (ovalis) which was found to consist of two nonidentical subunits of 40 kDa and 48 kDa [4].

L-Methionine must be incorporated into the human diet in order to biosynthesize L-cysteine (Figure 1) by trans-sulfuration pathway [5]. In yeast, methionine and cysteine supplementation was required in order to biosynthesize cysteine or methionine, respectively. The microorganisms can synthesize the sulphur containing amino acids by utilizing inorganic sulphate via the de novo cysteine biosynthesis pathway [6]. Escherichia coli and plants utilize the forward trans-sulfuration pathway such that methionine is biosynthesized from cysteine or they may utilize inorganic sulphate via de novo cysteine biosynthesis [7, 8]. There are different kinds of methionine biosynthesis pathways in different organisms as described in the MetaCyc database. E. coli K-12 methionine biosynthesis-I pathway that involves methionine biosynthesis from homoserine, methionine biosynthesis by transsulfuration. Arabidopsis thaliana, methionine biosynthesis-II pathway that involves methionine biosynthesis from homoserine-II. Corynebacterium glutamicum, Leptospira meyeri, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae follow methionine biosynthesis-III pathway that performs homoserine methionine biosynthesis and methionine biosynthesis by sufhdrylation. Arabidopsis thaliana, Bacillus subtilis, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumonia, Lupinus luteus, and Oryza sativa follow methionine salvage-I pathway while Homo sapiens and Rattus norvegicus possess methionine salvage-II system. Bacillus subtilis, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Leptospira meyeri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida and Saccharomyces cerevisiae possess a unique superpathway of methionine biosynthesis (by sulfhydrylation). On other hand, Arabidopsis thaliana, Lupinus luteus, Oryza sativa, Plantago major, and Solanum lycopersicum follow Yang cycle/MTA cycle [9]. E. histolytica and T. vaginalis have a methionine catabolic pathway and elements of a de novo sulphide biosynthetic pathway for cysteine biosynthesis in E. histolytica. These differences in cysteine metabolism between humans and parasites are of particular interest, especially for the future development of antiparasitic compounds. Currently, de novo engineering of a human MGL has been followed for achieving systemic L-methionine depletion in cancer therapy [10].

2. Sources of MGL

MGL is widely distributed in bacteria, especially in Pseudomonas spp. and is induced by the addition of L-methionine to the culture medium. Crystal structures of MGL have been reported from Pseudomonas putida (P. putida) [17, 18], Citrobacter freundii [47], Trichomonas vaginalis [3], and Entamoeba histolytica [21, 22]. The MGL was isolated from different sources such as bacterial, protozoans, fungal, archaeon, and plants (Table 1).


BacteriaBrevibacterium linens [11]
Clostridium sporogenes [12]
Citrobacter intermedius [13]
Citrobacter freundii [14]
Porphyromonas gingivalis [15]
Pseudomonas ovalis [16]
Pseudomonas putida [17, 18]
Treponema denticola [19]
Micrococcus luteus, Arthrobacter sp., Corynebacterium glutamicum and Staphylococcus equorum [20]

ProtozoaTrichomonas vaginalis [3]
Entamoeba histolytica [2123]

PlantArabidopsis thaliana [24]

ArchaeonFerroplasma acidarmanus [25]

FungusAspergillus sp. RS-1a [26]
Geotrichum candidum [27]
Aspergillus flavipes [28]
Scopulariopsis brevicaulis
A. carneus
Penicillium notatum
Fusarium solani

3. MGL Isolation

The bacterial, protozons, archaeal, and plants produce intracellular MGL and fungal sources produce extracellular MGL. Therefore isolation of MGL from microbial sources required cell disruption by chemical, enzymatic, and mechanical methods. Fugal sources produce extracellular MGL; thus, there is no need for cell disruption. Amongst above described MGL sources, P. putida is reported to be the best source for MGL production. P. putida cell pellets were disrupted by passage through French press. The ammonium sulphate precipitated crude cell lysate was applied on DEAE-cellulose and Sephadex G200 column, respectively. The MGL specific activity (Units/mg protein) from P. putida was 14.20 that improved to 3,735 after column chromatography, whereas, in case of Aspergillus flavipes, the specific activity (Units/mg protein) was 12.58. A. flavipes required 10-day incubation period for growth and 8 days for production time, whereas P. putida needed 24–48 h incubation and production time for growth [17, 28]. Microorganisms are most important and convenient sources of commercial enzymes production. Moreover, they have an advantage that they can be cultivated by using inexpensive media and enzyme production occurs in short time.

4. Biochemical Reaction Catalyzed by MGL

MGL catalyzes the conversion of L-methionine to α-ketobutyrate, methanethiol, and ammonia by α, γ-elimination reaction (Figure 2).

5. Methionase Assay

The free sulphydryl group in solution could be quantitatively measured [48] by 5,5′-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB). The DTNB was used as screening dye in agar media to detect methanethiol, which reduces DTNB to form yellow coloured aryl mercaptan (2-nitro-5-thiobenzoate or TNB) around the bacterial colony that is able to produce MGL enzyme. DTNB has little absorbance, but when it reacts with thiol (SH) groups on proteins under mild alkaline conditions (pH 7-8), the 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoate anion (TNB2-) gives an intense yellow color (Figure 3). Ellman’s reagent is useful assay reagent because of its specificity for SH groups [49] at neutral pH, high molar extinction coefficient, and short reaction time. MGL activity was quantitatively assayed by 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolone hydrazone (MBTH) which determines the amount of α-ketobutyrate produced spectrophotometricalIy at 320 nm. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-dimethyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay [50] was used to determine the in vitro growth inhibition of tumour cells by MGL treatment.

6. Methionine Requirement in Cancer Cell

Tumours cells have uncontrolled rapid growth and proliferation as compared to the normal cells [51]. Many malignant human cell lines have enhanced requirements of methionine for high protein synthesis and regulation of DNA expression in cancer cells [31, 5257]. Methionine is converted to S-adenosylmethionine and it becomes methyl donor for DNA methylation, an epigenetic phenomenon [5861] associated with cancer (Figure 4). The high methionine diets were associated with increased prostate cancer risk. The higher availability of L-methionine leads to higher bioavailability of S-adenosylmethionine to donate methyl groups to DNA, resulting in DNA hypermethylation of regulatory regions, including tumour suppressors [62, 63].

The CpG is a cytosine-guanosine (CG) dinucleotide DNA sequence, in which the cytosine undergoes chemical modification to contain a methyl group. The methyl binding protein (MBP) primarily was involved in gene regulation of normal cells to exert transcriptional control and also exploited by cancer cells to escape such control [64]. DNA methylation is essential for normal development but in some diseases, such as cancer, gene promoter CpG islands acquire abnormal hypermethylation. The transcriptional silencing due to hypermethylation was inherited by daughter cells following cell division. Alterations of DNA methylation have been recognized to play important role in cancer development. The CpG hypermethylation has been observed in cancer cell lines such as breast, colon, lung, head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, glioblastoma, acute myeloid leukemia, medulloblastoma, and testicular germ cells tumours [65]. UHRF1 (also known as ICBP90) and DNA methyltransferases (DNTs) are involved in maintenance of mammalian DNA methylation. UHRF1 (ubiquitin-like, two zinc-finger domains PHD, RING), also known as NP95 in mouse and ICBP90 in human, is required for maintaining DNA methylation. ICBP90 binds to the methylated retinoblastoma gene (RB1) gene promoter in the G1 phase and allows cells to smoothly enter the S phase [66, 67]. DNMT1 was found to be the sole detectable DNA methyltransferase in all murine tissues and cell types examined till date. Pyrosequencing assays were used to measure the DNA methylation of CDKN2A, RASSF1, CYGB, CDH13, DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, and UHRF1 promoters [68]. UHRF1 overexpression in zebrafish hepatocytes causes DNA hypomethylation, Tp53-mediated senescence, and hepatocellular carcinoma [69, 70]. Restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) was also used to assess the methylation in human malignancies. L-Methionine downregulates the genes belonging to protein kinase families on MCF-7 breast cancer cells and LNCaP prostate cancer cells and showed antiproliferative effect. L-Methionine also activates some of the genes involved in cellular redox regulation [71]. L-Methionine is required for the biosynthesis of the polyamines spermine and spermidine, which are mainly involved in cell proliferation [72]. The site-specific hypermethylation of cancer-related genes and miRNAs (microRNAs) hypomethylation occur in many cancers. Hypomethylation of miRNAs result in genome instability and activation of protooncogenes. The hypermethylation causes repression of tumour suppressor miRNAs by hypermethylation of their corresponding promoter loci. The miRNAs regulate gene expression within a cell and in the neighboring cells [7375].

The normal cells have methionine synthase and can form methionine from homocysteine by methyl tetrahydrofolate and betaine as methyl group donors [76]. Methionine-dependent tumour cell lines present no or low levels of methionine synthase [51]. The dependence of tumours on methionine synthase for various cell lines in comparison to the normal cells has been previously reported [7779]. L-Methionine is required for the synthesis of vitamins, antioxidants, DNA stabilizers, epigenetic DNA modulators, coenzymes [61, 80, 81], proteins, polyamines (proper cell development), antioxidative stress defense (glutathione/trypanothione), iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis (energy metabolism), and methylation reactions and it also regulates the gene expression [58, 78]. The L-methionine is the first amino acid incorporated into many functional proteins during translation and also serves as a precursor for cysteine biosynthesis. Methionine dependence has been observed in many human cancer cell lines and cancer xenografts in animal models [8284]. Methionine dependence is a metabolic defect seen only in cancer cells and such malignant cells do not grow in a medium in which methionine is depleted [30, 85]. Thus, L-methionase has received appreciable attention as a therapeutic agent against various types of methionine dependent tumours [86]. Dietary factors and epigenetic regulator play essential roles in antitumour activities [87]. Several approaches such as starvation of the tumour cells for methionine using methionine-free diets display a reliable efficacy against various types of tumour cells [88]. When tumour cells were deprived of methionine in a homocysteine containing medium in vitro, they were reversibly arrested in the late S/G2 phase of the cell cycle and finally undergo apoptosis [8991]. The methionine/valine depleted, tyrosine lowered, and arginine enriched in the diet were the most rationalized form of diet to achieve inhibition of tumour growth [92, 93]. The methionine-free diet is therapeutically not efficient due to economic and technical considerations [88]. A breast cancer cell line MDAMB468 showed methionine dependence and this dependency was due to SAM limitation [94]. There are a few other methionine dependent cell lines (Table 2) reported in the literature.

Methionine dependent cell line(s)References

PC-3 cell line human prostate[29]
Prostate cancer PC3; lung carcinoma SKLU-I; fibrosarcoma
HT 1080
Lung adenocarcinoma A-549 and the
acute lymphoblastic leukemia CCRF-HSB-2,
W 256[32]
D-54, SWB77 (human glioblastomas) and Daoy (human medulloblastoma)[33]
Human melanoma cell line MeWoLC1[34]

Cancer cells showed Warburg effect that refers to an increased utilization of glucose via glycolysis and was common in cancerous cells [95]. Glucose transport in cells is rate-limiting step for glucose metabolism mediated by facilitative glucose transporter (GLUT) proteins. The sugar transporters become activated in cancer cells so they incorporate higher amounts of sugar than normal cells. In tumour cells membrane transporter and channel proteins enhance uptake from outer sources and endogenous synthesis increases amongst many transporters glucose transporters (GLUTs) and sodium dependent sugar transporters (SGLT) play main role [96, 97]. The SGLT transporters comprises the sodium-glucose symporter SGLT2 expression was significantly higher in liver and lymph node [98]. The tumour has increased fatty acid synthesis and increased rate(s) of glutamine metabolism. High degree of GLUT1 expression has been reported in human hepatocellular carcinoma, oral cancer [99] and human pancreatic carcinoma (PC) cell line [100105], and MKN45 (human gastric cancer). The glucose passes through membrane by facilitated diffusion via GLUT or by active transport through a SGLT [106]. Therefore cellular metabolic enzymes such as glucose transporters, hexokinase, pyruvate kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, fatty acid synthase, and glutaminase targeting enhance the efficacy of common therapeutic agents [95]. GLUT-1 overexpression increased matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) promoter activity and was involved in binding of p53 to the MMP-2 promoter [107]. Solute-linked carrier family A1 member 5 (SLC1A5) mediates glutamine transport was overexpressed an associated with squamous lung cancer [108]. CPT-1 transporter helps in fatty acids transport in the form of acyl CoA and converted acetyl CoA. Acetyl CoA enters the TCA cycle and produces NADH which fuels the cell by oxidative phosphorylation [104]. AKT (protein kinase B PKB), a serine/threonine specific protein kinase activation, promotes cell growth, survival, and upregulation of ER-UDP hydrolysis enzyme as observed in human cancers. The ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 5 (ENTPD5), an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) enzyme, elevated lactate production under aerobic conditions [109]. ENTPD5 expression and AKT activation is common in both cultured prostate cancer cell lines and primary human prostate carcinoma. Lowered ATP/AMP ratio increases glycolysis, elevates lactate production, and provides glycolytic intermediates for biomass production. The overexpressed α-subunit of ATP synthase, in breast cancer, was involved in the progression and metastasis of breast cancer [110, 111]. Periplocin downregulated the ATP synthase ecto-α-subunit (ATP5A1) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1 (eIF5A) by periplocin mediated growth inhibition of A549 cells [112]. ATP synthase was upregulated in cancer cells [113, 114]. Ion channels like Na2+, Ca2+, K+, and Cl play significant role in cells. The intracellular chloride channel (CLIC) plays an essential role in cellular function, pH, electrogenic balance and maintaining membrane potential in organelles. The chloride channel (CLIC1-5) except CLIC4 became overexpressed in cancer cells. CLIC4 expression reduced in tumour cells [115, 116] and ion channels used to inhibit cancer cell growth [117]. The flow of potassium ions plays important functions, such as cell proliferation, angiogenesis or cell migration, which have also recently been assessed [118, 119]. ABC transporters require energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to translocate substrates across cell membranes. This protein can transport cationic or electrically neutral substrates as well as a broad spectrum of amphiphilic substrates [120]. The ABCG2 (G-subfamily of human ABC) transporter was downregulated in cancer cells [121]. ABC transporters showed multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancer cells by the overexpression of ABC transporters which increased efflux of drugs from cancer cells, thereby decreasing intracellular drug concentration [122, 123].

7. Utilization of MGL in Cancer Therapy

7.1. Combinational Therapy

Therapeutic exploitation of P. putida MGL to deplete plasma methionine has been extensively investigated [65, 66]. The MGL was tested as a potent antiproliferative enzyme towards Lewis lung and human colon carcinoma [124], glioblastoma [33], and neuroblastoma [125]. The cancer cell targeted drugs, that is, small molecules, are not fully effective because cancer stem cells are able to expel the drugs before the cancer cells are destroyed and the cancer cells are then able to renew and produce relapse of the disease. A therapeutic approach to deplete methionine from tumours is to treat the cells with recombinant MGL from P. putida [PpMGL]. The growth of human tumours in vivo and in vitro (xenographed in nude mice) is reported to be inhibited upon treatment with recombinant PpMGL when compared to normal cells [126]. Reduction in cell growth is also achieved by integrating PpMGLgene into human lung cancer cells by using a retroviral-based vector. The treatment with exogenous recombinant PpMGL, in order to deplete intracellular and extracellular methionine (Figure 5) levels, has been attempted [38, 127]. MGL alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 1-3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), and vincristine has shown efficacy and synergy, respectively, in mouse models of colon cancer, lung cancer, and brain cancer [41, 125, 128]. It was also reported that MGL introduced by adenovirus vector inhibited the growth of tumours in vitro. MGL, when combined with selenomethionine [SeMET], a suicide prodrug substrate of MGL, inhibited tumour growth in rodents and prolonged their survivals [127].

The effect of prodrug [Selenomethionine] and the toxic product [Methylselenol] synthesized in the tumour cells is presented below:

The MGL gene product, α-methionine-γ-lyase converts nontoxic SeMET to methylselenol that catalyzes oxidation of thiols to generate toxic superoxide. Apoptosis occurs mainly via a mitochondrial pathway [89]. Methylselenol readily diffused to the surrounding nontransduced tumour cells, destroying the mitochondrial membrane by the oxidative stress [39]. Treatment of the transduced cells with exogenous selenomethionine is found to inhibit tumour cell growth [129]. The methylselenol is required in very low concentration to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [130]. Methylselenol promotes the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP) that inhibits the migration of tumour cells [131]. Methylselenol induced apoptosis reported in many cancer cells such as murine melanoma B16F10 [132], fibrosarcoma cells HT1080 [130, 131, 133], colon cancer derived HCT-116 [134], andhuman prostate cancer cells LNCaP [135]. Methylselenol inhibits cell proliferation in the cancerous HCT116 cells as compared to normal cells NCM460 [134]. Methylselenol rapidly decreased cellular prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in LNCaP cells [135]. ROS promote cell proliferation in low concentration, whereas increase of ROS can induce cell death. Therefore balance between generation and elimination of ROS maintains the proper function. Methylselenol catalyzes the oxidation of thiols, generating toxic ROS causing mitochondrial swelling, releasing cytochrome C, activating the caspase cascade, and inducing the cell apoptosis and death [136]. Selenomethionine is relatively nontoxic to the mammalian cells due to their lack of L-methionase. The maximum antiprostate cancers activity was observed by selenomethionine methionase treatment [137]. The sensitivity of tumour cells to selenomethionine was increased by 1,000-fold via transduction by adenovirus mediated methionase gene [138]. The combination of methionase gene, methionase, and selenomethionine are effective against all methionine dependent tumours [39, 127].

7.2. Use of Fusion Proteins in Cancer Cell Targeting

The oxidative stress in tumour cells caused exposure of phosphatidylserine on the surface of the vascular endothelium of blood vessels in tumours but not on normal cells [139]. The fusion protein (FP) consisting of L-methionase linked to human annexin-V injected into the bloodstream will bind to the marker on vascular endothelial cells of the tumour only. The FP catalyzed the conversion of nontoxic prodrug selenomethionine into toxic methylselenol and also prevented the methionine supplementation to the tumour cells, thereby killing the tumour and/or inhibiting its growth due to methionine restriction [140142]. The great advantage of FP is that it does not require to be delivered directly to the tumour cells but only to the bloodstream. ATF-methionase FP (amino-terminal fragment of urokinase) was used to inhibit cancer cell proliferation and migration, which supports targeting L-methionase to the surface of the cancer cells. The FP has potential as a selective therapeutic agent for the treatment of various methionine-dependent cancers [143].

8. Modifications of L-Methionase to Reduce Its Side Effects

Tumour growth inhibitory effect of rMGL and PEG-MGL on human cancer cells such as human lung, colon, kidney, brain, prostate, and melanoma cancer cells and lung cancer orthotopic model [38, 144]. It was reported that administration of MGL resulted in a steady-state depletion of plasma methionine to less than 2 μM concentration. The only manifested toxicity was a decreased food intake and a slight weight loss. Serum albumin and red cell values declined transiently during treatment, which might be related to extensive blood sampling, although vomiting was frequently observed in macaque monkeys [145]. To overcome this problem, polyethylene glycol-conjugated MGL (PEG-MGL) was prepared. Simultaneous coadministration of pyridoxal 5′-phosphate and oleic acid or dithiothreitol treatment also strengthened effectiveness of PEG-MGL. To improve the MGL therapeutic potential, MGL was coupled to methoxy polyethylene glycol succinimidyl glutarate-5000 (MEGC-PEG-5000). The half-life due to pegylation increased 6 to 19 times while plasma methionine depletion efficacy decreased 8 to 48 times. Protective effect of high-level of pegylation helps to remove PLP dependence. PEG-rMGL demonstrated a significant decrease in antigenicity [146]. The specific activity of PEG-MGL increased with DTT [147]. Although L-methionase from bacterial (prokaryotic) origin has immunogenic issues that can be overcome by PEGylation and by other methods such as deimmunization by combinational T-cell epitope removal using neutral drift [148].

9. MGL Cloning

MGL was used for methionine depletion in vivo [149]. Bacterial enzymes from various sources have been purified and tested as methionine depleting agents against cancer cell lines. The P. putida (pMGL) source was selected for therapeutic applications due to its high catalytic activity, low , and a relatively high value [17]. The reaction mechanism characterized by using site-directed mutagenesis [150, 151]. The gene(s) for MGL was/were cloned into suitable host cells (Table 3).

Gene fromHost strain for expressionSelectable markerReferences

P. putida. E. coli MV1184Ampicillin[35]
P. putida E. coli BL21 (DE3)Ampicillin[36]
P. putida ICR3460E. coli JM109Tetracycline[37]
P. putida Lung cancer cell line H460GFP fluorescence, Penicillin, Streptomycin[38]
P. putida Human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cell line (A549 cells)G418 (Geneticin)[39]
P. putida ICR3460E. coli JM109Tetracycline[40]
P. putida ICR3460E. coli JM109Tetracycline[41]
Trichomonas vaginalis E.  coli M15pREP4 Ampicillin and Kanamycin[42]
Trichomonas vaginalis E.  coli M15[pREP4] Ampicillin and Kanamycin[43]
Treponema denticola ATCC35405E. coli BL21Ampicillin[19]
Entamoeba histolytica E. coli BL21 Ampicillin[22]
Kluyveromyces lactis CLIB 640E. coli DH10BAmpicillin [44]
Arabidopsis E. coli BL21Carbenicillin[24]
Brevibacterium linens E. coli DH5αAmpicillin [45]

10. Future Prospective

The unique catalytic reaction of MGL and its limited distribution in pathogens but not in human make this enzyme a promising target to design novel chemotherapeutic agents. Tumour cells show enhanced methionine dependence/requirement in comparison to the normal cells. The greater requirement of methionine by rapidly growing tumour cells supports high protein synthesis and regulation of DNA expression yet it can be exploited by the use of methionase-based therapy to rapidly deplete the cancerous cells. Thus the forced restriction of methionine may be an important strategy in cancer growth control particularly in malignant/cancers that exhibit dependence on methionine for their survival and proliferation. Currently fusion proteins (consisting of L-methionase linked to human annexin-V) may have an advantage in comparison to other approaches as they show application in specifically targeting tumour cells without affecting the normal cells.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, for the award of an Inspire Fellowship [IF130378] to one of the authors [BS] as well as Department of Biotechnology for providing liberal funds as well as extending Bioinformatics Facility to the authors.


  1. J. P. Richard and T. L. Amyes, “On the importance of being zwitterionic: enzymatic catalysis of decarboxylation and deprotonation of cationic carbon,” Bioorganic Chemistry, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 354–366, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Wolfenden, “Benchmark reaction rates, the stability of biological molecules in water, and the evolution of catalytic power in enzymes,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 80, pp. 645–667, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. C. Lockwood and G. H. Coombs, “Purification and characterization of methionine γ-lyase from Trichomonas vaginalis,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 279, no. 3, pp. 675–682, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  4. T. Nakayama, N. Esaki, K. Sugie, T. T. Beresov, H. Tanaka, and K. Soda, “Purification of bacterial L-methionine γ-lyase,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 421–424, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. H. Stipanuk, “Metabolism of sulfur-containing amino acids.,” Annual review of nutrition, vol. 6, pp. 179–209, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. Thomas and Y. Surdin-Kerjan, “Metabolism of sulfur amino acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 503–532, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  7. S. Ravanel, B. Gakière, D. Job, and R. Douce, “The specific features of methionine biosynthesis and metabolism in plants,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 13, pp. 7805–7812, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Sekowska, H. Kung, and A. Danchin, “Sulfur metabolism in Escherichia coli and related bacteria: facts and fiction,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 145–177, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  9. R. Caspi, T. Altman, K. Dreher et al., “The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. D742–D753, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Stone, O. Paley, J. Hu, B. Ekerdt, N. Cheung, and G. Georgiou, “De novo engineering of a human cystathionine-γ-lyase for systemic L-methionine depletion cancer therapy,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1822–1829, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. B. Dias and B. Weimer, “Purification and characterization of L-methionine γ-lyase from Brevibacterium linens BL2,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3327–3331, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  12. W. Kreis and C. Hession, “Isolation and purification of L-methionine-α-deamino-γ-mercapto methane-lyase (L-methionase) from Clostridium sporogenes,” Cancer Research, vol. 33, pp. 1862–1865, 1973. View at: Google Scholar
  13. N. G. Faleev, M. V. Troitskaya, E. A. Paskonova, M. B. Saporovskaya, and V. M. Belikov, “L-Methionine-γ-lyase in Citrobacter intermedius cells: stereochemical requirements with respect to the thiol structure,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 590–593, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. I. V. Manukhov, D. V. Mamaeva, E. A. Morozova et al., “L-methionine γ-lyase from Citrobacter freundii: cloning of the gene and kinetic parameters of the enzyme,” Biochemistry, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 361–369, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Yoshimura, Y. Nakano, Y. Yamashita, T. Oho, T. Saito, and T. Koga, “Formation of methyl mercaptan from L-methionine by Porphyromonas gingivalis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 6912–6916, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. Tanaka, N. Esaki, T. Yamamoto, and K. Soda, “Purification and properties of methioninase from Pseudomonas ovalis,” FEBS Letters, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 307–311, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Ito, T. Nakamura, and Y. Eguchi, “Purification and characterization of methioninase from Pseudomonas putida,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 1263–1272, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  18. D. Kudou, S. Misaki, M. Yamashita et al., “Structure of the antitumour enzyme L-methionine γ-lyase from Pseudomonas putida at 1.8 Å resolution,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 535–544, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. Fukamachi, Y. Nakano, S. Okano, Y. Shibata, Y. Abiko, and Y. Yamashita, “High production of methyl mercaptan by L-methionine-α-deamino-γ-mercaptomethane lyase from Treponema denticola,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 331, no. 1, pp. 127–131, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. Bonnarme, L. Psoni, and H. E. Spinnler, “Diversity of L-methionine catabolism pathways in cheese-ripening bacteria,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 5514–5517, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. Sato, W. Yamagata, K. Kamei, T. Nozaki, and S. Harada, “Expression, purification and crystallization of L-methionine γ-lyase 2 from Entamoeba histolytica,” Acta Crystallographica F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1034–1036, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. Sato, T. Karaki, A. Shimizu, K. Kamei, S. Harada, and T. Nozaki, “Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of L-methionine γ-lyase 1 from Entamoeba histolytica,” Acta Crystallographica F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 697–699, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Tokoro, T. Asai, S. Kobayashi, T. Takeuchi, and T. Nozaki, “Identification and characterization of two isoenzymes of methionine-γ-lyase from Entamoeba histolytica: a key enzyme of sulphur amino acid degradation in an anaerobic parasitic protist that lacks forward and reverse trans-sulfuration pathways,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 43, pp. 42717–42727, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. Rébeillé, S. Jabrin, R. Bligny et al., “Methionine catabolism in Arabidopsis cells is initiated by a γ-cleavage process and leads to S-methylcysteine and isoleucine syntheses,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 42, pp. 15687–15692, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. J. Baumler, K. Hung, K. C. Jeong, and C. W. Kaspar, “Production of methanethiol and volatile sulfur compounds by the archaeon Ferroplasma acidarmanus,” Extremophiles, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 841–851, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Ruiz-Herrera and R. L. Starkey, “Dissimilation of methionine by a demethiolase of Aspergillus species,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 764–770, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  27. P. Bonnarme, C. Lapadatescu, M. Yvon, and H. Spinnler, “L-methionine degradation potentialities of cheese-ripening microorganisms,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 663–674, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. A. Khalaf and A. S. A. El-Sayed, “L-Methioninase production by filamentous fungi: I-screening and optimization under submerged conditions,” Current Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 219–226, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. F. Poirson-Bichat, G. Gonfalone, R. A. Bras-Gonçalves, B. Dutrillaux, and M. F. Poupon, “Growth of methionine-dependent human prostate cancer (PC-3) is inhibited by ethionine combined with methionine starvation,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 1605–1612, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. Guo, H. Herrera, A. Groce, and R. M. Hoffman, “Expression of the biochemical defect of methionine dependence in fresh patient tumors in primary histo-culture,” Cancer Research, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2479–2483, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  31. W. Kreis and M. Goodenow, “Methionine requirement and replacement by homocysteine in tissue cultures of selected rodent and human malignant and normal cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 2259–2262, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. C. Kennelly, J. A. Blair, and A. E. Pheasant, “Metabolism of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate by rats bearing the Walker 256 carcinosarcoma,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 440–443, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. M. Kokkinakis, R. M. Hoffman, E. P. Frenkel et al., “Synergy between methionine stress and chemotherapy in the treatment of brain tumor xenografts in athymic mice,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 4017–4023, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  34. D. Watkins, “Cobalamin metabolism in methionine-dependent human tumour and leukemia cell lines,” Clinical and Investigative Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 151–158, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  35. H. Inoue, K. Inagaki, M. Sugimoto, N. Esaki, K. Soda, and H. Tanaka, “Structural analysis of the L-methionine γ-lyase gene from Pseudomonas putida,” The Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1120–1125, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  36. Y. Tan, M. Xu, X. Tan et al., “Overexpression and large-scale production of recombinant L-methionine-α-deamino-γ-mercaptomethane-lyase for novel anticancer therapy,” Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 233–245, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. T. Takakura, T. Ito, S. Yagi et al., “High-level expression and bulk crystallization of recombinant L-methionine γ-lyase, an anticancer agent,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 183–192, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. K. Miki, M. Xu, Z. An et al., “Survival efficacy of the combination of the methioninase gene and methioninase in a lung cancer orthotopic model,” Cancer Gene Therapy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 332–338, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. N. Yamamoto, A. Gupta, M. Xu et al., “Methioninase gene therapy with selenomethionine induces apoptosis in bcl-2-overproducing lung cancer cells,” Cancer Gene Therapy, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 445–450, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. Takakura, K. Mitsushima, S. Yagi et al., “Assay method for antitumor L-methionine γ- lyase : comprehensive kinetic analysis of the complex reaction with L -methionine,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 327, no. 2, pp. 233–240, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. T. Yoshioka, T. Wada, N. Uchida et al., “Anticancer efficacy in vivo and in vitro, synergy with 5-fluorouracil, and safety of recombinant methioninase,” Cancer Research, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 2583–2587, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  42. A. E. McKie, T. Edlind, J. Walker, J. C. Mottram, and G. H. Coombs, “The primitive protozoon Trichomonas vaginalis contains two methionine γ-lyase genes that encode members of the γ-family of pyridoxal 5′-phosphate-dependent enzymes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 10, pp. 5549–5556, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. G. H. Coombs and J. C. Mottram, “Trifluoromethionine, a prodrug designed against methionine γ-lyase-containing pathogens, has efficacy in vitro and in vivo against Trichomonas vaginalis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1743–1745, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. Kagkli, P. Bonnarme, C. Neuvéglise, T. M. Cogan, and S. Casaregola, “L-methionine degradation pathway in Kluyveromyces lactis: identification and functional analysis of the genes encoding L-methionine aminotransferase,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 3330–3335, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. K. Pavani and S. V. Saradhi, “Cloning and expression of methionine-γ-lyase (MGL) of Brevibacterium linens,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 615–631, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  46. H. Hori, K. Takabayashi, L. Orvis, D. A. Carson, and T. Nobori, “Gene cloning and characterization of Pseudomonas putida L-Methionine-α- deamino-γ-mercaptomethane-lyase,” Cancer Research, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2116–2122, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  47. D. V. Mamaeva, E. A. Morozova, A. D. Nikulin et al., “Structure of Citrobacter freundii L-methionine γ-lyase,” Acta Crystallographica F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 546–549, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. G. L. Ellman, “Tissue sulfhydryl groups,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 1959. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. F. S. A. Habeeb, “Reaction of protein sulphydryl groups with ellmans reagent in enzyme structure,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 25, pp. 457–464, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  50. M. C. Alley, D. A. Scudiero, A. Monks et al., “Feasibility of drug screening with panels of human tumor cell lines using a microculture tetrazolium assay,” Cancer Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 589–601, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  51. R. M. Hoffman, “Altered methionine metabolism and transmethylation in cancer,” Anticancer Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  52. B. C. Halpern, B. R. Clark, D. N. Hardy, R. M. Halpern, and R. A. Smith, “The effect of replacement of methionine by homocystine on survival of malignant and normal adult mammalian cells in culture,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 1133–1136, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. W. Kreis, “Tumor therapy by deprivation of L-methionine: rationale and results,” Cancer Treatment Reports, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1069–1072, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  54. W. Kreis, A. Baker, V. Ryan, and A. Bertasso, “Effect of nutritional and enzymatic methionine deprivation upon human normal and malignant cells in tissue culture,” Cancer Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 634–641, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  55. P. H. Stern, C. D. Wallace, and R. M. Hoffman, “Altered methionine metabolism occurs in all members of a set of diverse human tumor cell lines,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. F. Breillout, E. Antoine, and M. F. Poupon, “Methionine dependency of malignant tumors: a possible approach for therapy,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 82, no. 20, pp. 1628–1632, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. E. M. Swisher, R. M. Gonzalez, T. Taniguchi et al., “Methylation and protein expression of DNA repair genes: association with chemotherapy exposure and survival in sporadic ovarian and peritoneal carcinomas,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 8, article 48, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. M. Geiman and K. Muegge, “DNA methylation in early development,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 105–113, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. Ramani, H. Yang, J. Kuhlenkamp et al., “Changes in the expression of methionine adenosyltransferase genes and S- adenosylmethionine homeostasis during hepatic stellate cell activation,” Hepatology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 986–995, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. G. L. Sen, J. A. Reuter, D. E. Webster, L. Zhu, and P. A. Khavari, “DNMT1 maintains progenitor function in self-renewing somatic tissue,” Nature, vol. 463, no. 7280, pp. 563–567, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. E. Ho, L. M. Beaver, D. E. Williams, and R. H. Dashwood, “Dietary factors and epigenetic regulation for prostate cancer prevention,” Advances in Nutrition, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 497–510, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. C. Vidal, D. J. Grant, C. D. Williams et al., “Associations between intake of folate, methionine, and vitamins B-12, B-6 and prostate cancer risk in American veterans,” Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 2012, Article ID 957467, 9 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. P. M. Das and R. Singal, “DNA methylation and cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 4632–4642, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. Parry and A. R. Clarke, “The roles of the methyl-CpG binding proteins in cancer,” Genes and Cancer, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 618–630, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. D. J. Smiraglia, L. J. Rush, M. C. Frühwald et al., “Excessive CpG island hypermethylation in cancer cell lines versus primary human malignancies,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 1413–1419, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. Jeanblanc, M. Mousli, R. Hopfner et al., “The retinoblastoma gene and its product are targeted by ICBP90: a key mechanism in the G1/S transition during the cell cycle,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 49, pp. 7337–7345, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. Bostick, K. K. Jong, P. Estève, A. Clark, S. Pradhan, and S. E. Jacobsen, “UHRF1 plays a role in maintaining DNA methylation in mammalian cells,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5845, pp. 1760–1764, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. A. Daskalos, U. Oleksiewicz, A. Filia et al., “UHRF1-mediated tumor suppressor gene inactivation in nonsmall cell lung cancer,” Cancer, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1027–1037, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. D. F. Calvisi, M. M. Simile, S. Ladu et al., “Altered methionine metabolism and global DNA methylation in liver cancer: relationship with genomic instability and prognosis,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 2410–2420, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. R. Mudbhary, Y. Hoshida, Y. Chemyavskaya et al., “UHRF1 overexpression drives DNA hypomethylation and hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Cell, vol. 25, pp. 196–209, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  71. M. A. Benavides, D. Hu, M. K. Baraoidan et al., “L-methionine-induced alterations in molecular signatures in MCF-7 and LNCaP cancer cells,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 441–453, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. T. Thomas and T. J. Thomas, “Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 244–258, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. A. Lujambio, S. Ropero, E. Ballestar et al., “Genetic unmasking of an epigenetically silenced microRNA in human cancer cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1424–1429, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. G. Mathonnet, M. R. Fabian, Y. V. Svitkin et al., “MicroRNA inhibition of translation initiation in vitro by targeting the cap-binding complex eIF4F,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5845, pp. 1764–1767, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. P. Lopez-Serra and M. Esteller, “DNA methylation-associated silencing of tumor-suppressor microRNAs in cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 1609–1622, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. S. H. Kenyon, C. J. Waterfield, J. A. Timbrell, and A. Nicolaou, “Methionine synthase activity and sulphur amino acid levels in the rat liver tumour cells HTC and Phi-1,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 381–391, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. R. G. Liteplo, S. E. Hipwell, D. S. Rosenblatt, S. Sillaots, and H. Lue-Shing, “Changes in cobalamin metabolism are associated with the altered methionine auxotrophy of highly growth autonomous human melanoma cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 332–338, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. C. D. Davis and E. O. Uthus, “DNA methylation, cancer susceptibility, and nutrient interactions,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 229, no. 10, pp. 988–995, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  79. A. S. A. El-Sayed, “Microbial L-methioninase, molecular characterization and therapeutic applications,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 86, pp. 445–467, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  80. E. Cellarier, X. Durando, M. P. Vasson et al., “Methionine dependency and cancer treatment,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 489–499, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. E. Thivat, X. Durando, A. Demidem et al., “A methionine-free diet associated with nitrosourea treatment down-regulates methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase activity in patients with metastatic cancer,” Anticancer Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2779–2783, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  82. T. Fiskerstrand, B. Christensen, O. B. Tysnes, P. M. Ueland, and H. Refsum, “Development and reversion of methionine dependence in a human glioma cell line: relation to homocysteine remethylation and cobalamin status,” Cancer Research, vol. 54, no. 18, pp. 4899–4906, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  83. R. M. Hoffman and R. W. Erbe, “High in vivo rates of methionine biosynthesis in transformed human and malignant rat cells auxotrophic for methionine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1523–1527, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  84. J. O. Mecham, D. Rowitch, C. D. Wallace, P. H. Stern, and R. M. Hoffman, “The metabolic defect of methionine dependence occurs frequently in human tumor cell lines,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 429–434, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. R. M. Hoffman, “Altered methionine metabolism, DNA methylation and oncogene expression in carcinogenesis: a review and synthesis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 738, no. 1-2, pp. 49–87, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  86. D. M. Kokkinakis, S. C. Schold Jr., H. Hori, and T. Nobori, “Effect of long-term depletion of plasma methionine on the growth and survival of human brain tumor xenografts in athymic mice,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 195–204, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. C. Gerhäuser, “Cancer cell metabolism, epigenetics and the potential influence of dietary components—a perspective,” Biomedical Research, vol. 23, pp. 1–21, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  88. N. Goseki, S. Yamazaki, M. Endo et al., “Antitumor effect of methionine-depleting total parenteral nutrition with doxorubicin administration on Yoshida sarcoma-bearing rats,” Cancer, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 1865–1872, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. H. Guo, V. K. Lishko, H. Herrera, A. Groce, T. Kubota, and R. M. Hoffman, “Therapeutic tumor-specific cell cycle block induced by methionine starvation in vivo,” Cancer Research, vol. 53, no. 23, pp. 5676–5679, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  90. R. M. Hoffman and S. J. Jacobsen, “Reversible growth arrest in simian virus 40-transformed human fibroblasts,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 7306–7310, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  91. T. Nagahama, N. Goseki, and M. Endo, “Doxorubicin and vincristine with methionine depletion contributed to survival in the Yoshida sarcoma bearing rats,” Anticancer Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  92. Y. C. He, Y. H. Wang, J. Cao, J. W. Chen, D. Y. Pan, and Y. K. Zhou, “Effect of complex amino acid imbalance on growth of tumor in tumor-bearing rats,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 2772–2775, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  93. Y. He, J. Cao, J. Chen, D. Pan, and Y. Zhou, “Influence of methionine/valine-depleted enteral nutrition on nucleic acid and protein metabolism in tumor-bearing rats,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 771–774, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  94. K. Booher, D. Lin, S. L. Borrego, and P. Kaiser, “Downregulation of Cdc6 and pre-replication complexes in response to methionine stress in breast cancer cells,” Cell Cycle, vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 4414–4423, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. Y. Zhao, E. B. Butler, and M. Tan, “Targeting cellular metabolism to improve cancer therapeutics,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 4, no. 3, article e532, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. L. A. Aparicio, M. B. Calvo, A. Figueroa, E. G. Pulido, and R. G. Campelo, “Potential role of sugar transporters in cancer and their relationship with anticancer therapy,” International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2010, Article ID 205357, 14 pages, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. R. Diaz-Ruiz, M. Rigoulet, and A. Devin, “The Warburg and Crabtree effects: On the origin of cancer cell energy metabolism and of yeast glucose repression,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1807, no. 6, pp. 568–576, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. N. Ishikawa, T. Oguri, T. Isobe, K. Fujitaka, and N. Kohno, “SGLT gene expression in primary lung cancers and their metastatic lesions,” Japanese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 874–879, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  99. R. J. Oliver, R. T. M. Woodwards, P. Sloan, N. S. Thakker, I. J. Stratford, and R. E. Airley, “Prognostic value of facilitative glucose transporter Glut-1 in oral squamous cell carcinomas treated by surgical resection: results of EORTC Translational Research Fund studies,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 503–507, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. M. Younes, L. V. Lechago, J. R. Somoano, M. Mosharaf, and J. Lechago, “Wide expression of the human erythrocyte glucose transporter Glut1 in human cancers,” Cancer Research, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1164–1167, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  101. S. N. Reske, K. G. Grillenberger, G. Glatting et al., “Overexpression of glucose transporter 1 and increased FDG uptake in pancreatic carcinoma,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1344–4348, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  102. T. Ito, Y. Noguchi, S. Satoh, H. Hayashi, Y. Inayama, and H. Kitamura, “Expression of facilitative glucose transporter isoforms in lung carcinomas: its relation to histologic type, differentiation grade and tumor stage,” Modern Pathology, vol. 11, pp. 437–443, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  103. Y. Noguchia, A. Saitoa, Y. Miyagib et al., “Suppression of facilitative glucose transporter-1 mRNA can suppress tumor growth,” Cancer Letters, vol. 154, pp. 175–182, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  104. M. L. Macheda, S. Rogers, and J. D. Best, “Molecular and cellular regulation of glucose transporter (GLUT) proteins in cancer,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 202, no. 3, pp. 654–662, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. S. Pizzi, A. Porzionato, C. Pasquali et al., “Glucose transporter-1 expression and prognostic significance in pancreatic carcinogenesis,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175–185, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  106. A. N. McCracken and A. L. Edinger, “Nutrient transporters: the Achilles' heel of anabolism,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 200–208, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. S. Ito, T. Fukusato, T. Nemoto, H. Sekihara, Y. Seyama, and S. Kubota, “Coexpression of glucose transporter 1 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 in human cancers,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 94, no. 14, pp. 1080–1091, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. M. Hassanein, M. D. Hoeksema, M. Shiota et al., “SLC1A5 mediates glutamine transport required for lung cancer cell growth and survival,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 560–570, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. M. Fang, Z. Shen, S. Huang et al., “The ER UDPase ENTPD5 promotes protein N-glycosylation, the Warburg effect, and proliferation in the PTEN pathway,” Cell, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 711–724, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. T. C. Huang, H. Y. Chang, C. H. Hsu, W. H. Kuo, K. J. Chang, and H. F. Juan, “Targeting therapy for breast carcinoma by ATP synthase inhibitor aurovertin B,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1433–1444, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. J. Pan, L. Sun, Y. Tao et al., “ATP synthase ecto-α-subunit: a novel therapeutic target for breast cancer,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, article 211, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. Z. Lu, Q. Song, J. Yang et al., “Comparative proteomic analysis of anti-cancer mechanism by periplocin treatment in lung cancer cells,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 33, pp. 859–868, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. W. J. Israelsen and M. G. V. Heiden, “ATP consumption promotes cancer metabolism,” Cell, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 669–671, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. Z. Ma, M. Cao, Y. Liu et al., “Mitochondrial F1Fo-ATP synthase translocates to cell surface in hepatocytes and has high activity in tumor-like acidic and hypoxic environment,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 530–537, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. K. S. Suh, M. Mutoh, M. Gerdes, and S. H. Yuspa, “CLIC4, an intracellular chloride channel protein, is a novel molecular target for cancer therapy,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings, vol. 10, pp. 105–109, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  116. K. S. Suh, J. M. Crutchley, A. Koochek et al., “Reciprocal modifications of CLIC4 in tumor epithelium and stroma mark malignant progression of multiple human cancers,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 121–131, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. A. Arcangeli, O. Crociani, E. Lastraioli, A. Masi, S. Pillozzi, and A. Becchetti, “Targeting ion channels in cancer: a novel frontier in antineoplastic therapy,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 66–93, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. L. A. Pardo and W. Stuhmer, “The roles of K+ channels in cancer,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 14, pp. 39–48, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  119. D. Urrego, A. P. Tomczak, F. Zahed, W. Stuhmer, and L. A. Pardo, “Potassium channels in cell cycle and cell proliferation,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 369, pp. 1–9, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  120. A. Pohl, P. F. Devaux, and A. Herrmann, “Function of prokaryotic and eukaryotic ABC proteins in lipid transport,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1733, no. 1, pp. 29–52, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. T. Ishikawa, H. Nakagawa, Y. Hagiya, N. Nonoguchi, S. Miyatake, and T. Kuroiwa, “Key role of human ABC transporter ABCG2 in photodynamic therapy and photodynamic diagnosis,” Advances in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 2010, Article ID 587306, 13 pages, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. I. Hlavata, B. Mohelnikova-Duchonova, R. Vaclavikova et al., “The role of ABC transporters in progression and clinical outcome of colorectal cancer,” Mutagenesis, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 187–196, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. Y. Sun, A. Patel, P. Kumar, and Z. Chen, “Role of ABC transporters in cancer chemotherapy,” Chinese Journal of Cancer, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 51–57, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. Y. Tan, X. Sun, M. Xu et al., “Polyethylene glycol conjugation of recombinant methioninase for cancer therapy,” Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. J. Hu and N. V. Cheung, “Methionine depletion with recombinant methioninase: In vitro and in vivo efficacy against neuroblastoma and its synergism with chemotherapeutic drugs,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 124, no. 7, pp. 1700–1706, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. Y. Tan, J. Zavala Sr., Q. Han et al., “Recombinant methioninase infusion reduces the biochemical endpoint of serum methionine with minimal toxicity in high-stage cancer patients,” Anticancer Research, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 3857–3860, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  127. K. Miki, M. Xu, A. Gupta et al., “Methioninase cancer gene therapy with selenomethionine as suicide prodrug substrate,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 18, pp. 6805–6810, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  128. Y. Tan, X. Sun, M. Xu et al., “Efficacy of recombinant methioninase in combination with cisplatin on human colon tumors in nude mice,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 2157–2163, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  129. R. Zhao, F. E. Domann, and W. Zhong, “Apoptosis induced by selenomethionine and methioninase is superoxide mediated and p53 dependent in human prostate cancer cells,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 3275–3284, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. H. Zeng, M. Wu, and J. H. Botnen, “Methylselenol, a selenium metabolite, induces cell cycle arrest in G1 phase and apoptosis via the extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2 pathway and other cancer signaling genes,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 139, no. 9, pp. 1613–1618, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. K. Zu, T. Bihani, A. Lin, Y.-. Park, K. Mori, and C. Ip, “Enhanced selenium effect on growth arrest by BiP/GRP78 knockdown in p53-null human prostate cancer cells,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 546–554, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. A. Kim, J. Oh, J. Park, and A. Chung, “Methylselenol generated from selenomethionine by methioninase downregulates integrin expression and induces caspase-mediated apoptosis of B16F10 melanoma cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 386–400, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. H. Zeng, M. Briske-Anderson, J. P. Idso, and C. D. Hunt, “The selenium metabolite methylselenol inhibits the migration and invasion potential of HT1080 tumor cells,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 1528–1532, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  134. H. Zeng, M. Briske-Anderson, M. Wu, and M. P. Moyer, “Methylselenol, a selenium metabolite, plays common and different roles in cancerous colon HCT116 cell and noncancerous NCM460 colon cell proliferation,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 128–135, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. S. D. Cho, C. Jiang, B. Malewicz et al., “Methyl selenium metabolites decrease prostate-specific antigen expression by inducing protein degradation and suppressing androgen-stimulated transcription,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 605–611, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  136. D. R. Green and J. C. Reed, “Mitochondria and apoptosis,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5381, pp. 1309–1312, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. P. Li, D. Nijhawan, I. Budihardjo et al., “Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation of Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade,” Cell, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 479–489, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. K. Miki, W. Al-Refaie, M. Xu et al., “Methioninase gene therapy of human cancer cells is synergistic with recombinant methioninase treatment,” Cancer Research, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 2696–2702, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  139. J. H. Stafford and P. E. Thorpe, “Increased exposure of phosphatidylethanolamine on the surface of tumor vascular endothelium,” Neoplasia, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 299–308, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. R. G. Harrison and Norman, “Enzyme prodrug cancer therapy selectively targeted to tumor cells or tumor vasculature and methods of production and use thereof,” US/0002978 A1 (patent), 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  141. B. D. V. Rite, J. J. Krais, M. Cherry, V. I. Sikavitsas, C. Kurkjian, and RG. Harrison, “Antitumor activity of an enzyme prodrug therapy targeted to the breast tumor vasculature,” Cancer Investigation, vol. 31, pp. 505–510, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  142. B. D. van Rite, Y. A. Lazrak, M. L. Pagnon et al., “Enzyme prodrug therapy designed to target L-methioninase to the tumor vasculature,” Cancer Letters, vol. 301, no. 2, pp. 177–184, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. N. R. Palwai, X. Zang, R. G. Harrison, D. Benbrook, and J. T. Pento, “Selective growth inhibition of cancer cells by L-methioninase-containing fusion protein targeted to the urokinase receptor,” Pharmacology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 271–275, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. Y. Tan, M. Xu, and R. M. Hoffman, “Broad selective efficacy of recombinant methioninase and polyethylene glycol-modified recombinant methioninase on cancer cells in vitro,” Anticancer Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1041–1046, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  145. Z. Yang, J. Wang, T. Yoshioka et al., “Pharmacokinetics, methionine depletion and antigenicity of recombinant methioninase in primates,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2131–2138, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. X. Sun, Z. Yang, S. Li et al., “In vivo efficacy of recombinant methioninase is enhanced by the combination of polyethylene glycol conjugation and pyridoxal 5′-phosphate supplementation,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 23, pp. 8377–8383, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  147. T. Takakura, A. Takimoto, Y. Notsu et al., “Physicochemical and pharmacokinetic characterization of highly potent recombinant L-methionine γ-lyase conjugated with polyethylene glycol as an antitumor agent,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2807–2814, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. J. R. Cantor, T. H. Yoo, A. Dixit, B. L. Iverson, T. G. Forsthuber, and G. Georgiou, “Therapeutic enzyme deimmunization by combinatorial T-cell epitope removal using neutral drift,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 1272–1277, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. V. K. Lishko, O. V. Lishko, and R. M. Hoffman, “Depletion of serum methionine by methioninase in mice,” Anticancer Research, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1465–1468, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  150. H. Inoue, K. Inagaki, N. Adachi et al., “Role of tyrosine 114 of L-methionine γ-lyase from Pseudomonas putida,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 2336–2343, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. D. Kudou, S. Misaki, M. Yamashita, T. Tamura, N. Esaki, and K. Inagaki, “The role of cysteine 116 in the active site of the antitumor enzyme L-methionine γ-lyase from Pseudomonas putida,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 1722–1730, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Bhupender Sharma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.