BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Osteogenic Biomaterials in Contemporary Dentistry

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 549785 |

Giovanna Zacchetti, Romain Dayer, René Rizzoli, Patrick Ammann, "Systemic Treatment with Strontium Ranelate Accelerates the Filling of a Bone Defect and Improves the Material Level Properties of the Healing Bone", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 549785, 10 pages, 2014.

Systemic Treatment with Strontium Ranelate Accelerates the Filling of a Bone Defect and Improves the Material Level Properties of the Healing Bone

Academic Editor: Seong-Hun Kim
Received02 Jun 2014
Accepted22 Jul 2014
Published28 Aug 2014


Rapid bone defect filling with normal bone is a challenge in orthopaedics and dentistry. Strontium ranelate (SrRan) has been shown to in vitro decrease bone resorption and increase bone formation, and represents a potential agent with the capacity to accelerate bone defect filling. In this study, bone tibial defects of 2.5 mm in diameter were created in 6-month-old female rats orally fed SrRan (625 mg/kg/d; 5/7 days) or vehicle for 4, 8, or 12 weeks (10 rats per group per time point) from the time of surgery. Tibias were removed. Micro-architecture was determined by micro-computed tomography (µCT) and material level properties by nanoindentation analysis. µCT analysis showed that SrRan administration significantly improved microarchitecture of trabecular bone growing into the defect after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment compared to vehicle. SrRan treatment also accelerated the growth of cortical bone over the defect, but with different kinetics compared to trabecular bone, as the effects were already significant after 4 weeks. Nanoindentation analysis demonstrated that SrRan treatment significantly increased material level properties of both trabecular bone and cortical bone filling the defect compared to vehicle. SrRan accelerates the filling of bone defect by improving cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture both quantitatively and qualitatively.

1. Introduction

Comminuted fractures, infection, dental extraction, bone metastasis, and orthopaedic surgery are among the main causes leading to a local loss of bone tissue. The age of the individual, hormonal status, nutrition, and presence of concomitant diseases may negatively affect bone tissue healing and the filling of the defect [13]. Bone defect healing occurs naturally after a phase of bleeding and inflammation and terminates with the formation of woven bone which is then remodelled by osteoclasts and replaced by lamellar bone by osteoblasts [4]. In cases of extensive bone loss requiring prosthetic fixation, as well as in fragile osteoporotic individuals, a treatment accelerating bone healing contributes to well-being and quality of life. Several approaches, such as the local or systemic administration of growth factors [5, 6] or mesenchymal stem cells [79], can represent advantageous alternatives to bone graft and the insertion of scaffolds of osteoinductive biomaterials.

The administration of anabolic or anticatabolic drugs commonly used to cure osteoporosis might promote bone defect healing by increasing bone formation or inhibiting bone resorption. Among these, the effect of the administration of antiresorptive agents to improve bone healing remains controversial. Bisphosphonates (BPs) do not interfere with the initial phase of bone healing, which is largely osteoclast-independent and leads to the filling of bone defect with woven bone. In some cases, BP administration appears to promote the formation of a larger callus [10] and suppression of the osteoclast activity delays the remodelling of woven bone and the formation of lamellar bone [1113]. Importantly, treatment with BPs does not induce the regeneration of cortical bone after fracture [14]. Among the anabolic treatments, the systemic and local administration of parathyroid hormone (PTH) was shown to be efficacious for fracture and bone defect healing in rats and humans [1517]. Depending on the anatomic localization of the bone lesion, the full repair of the cortical shell is crucial to restoring the load bearing capacity of bones. In osteoporotic nonfractured patients, PTH increases both trabecular bone volume and cortical thickness. However, it increases also cortical porosity, which may adversely affect bone strength [18].

By contrast, with bisphosphonates and PTH, strontium ranelate (SrRan) was shown to have a dual mechanism on bone formation activity and bone resorption mostly in vitro [1923]. The effect of SrRan in vivo depends on the animal model. In rodents, long-term treatment with SrRan increased vertebral bone mass and had a positive effect on microarchitectural parameters, bone material level properties, and bone strength [2426]. In monkeys, SrRan decreased histological markers of bone resorption, while preserving bone formation [27]. In ovariectomized rats, SrRan prevented bone loss [28] and had a beneficial effect on fracture healing, thus improving callus resistance to biomechanical torsional testing when compared to PTH [2931].

The aim of this study was to assess whether the systemic administration of SrRan accelerates the healing of a bone defect created in rat proximal tibia compared to vehicle-treated controls.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Animals and Diet

All experimental designs and procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Geneva, Faculty of Medicine. Sixty 6-month-old Sprague-Dawley female rats (Charles River Laboratories, L’Arbresle, France) were housed individually at 25°C with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle and strictly pair-fed a laboratory diet containing 15% casein, 0.8% phosphorus, 1% calcium, 70–80% carbohydrate, and 5% fat. Demineralized water was available ad libitum. Rats were then divided into six groups of 10 animals each. For a period of 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery, three groups (one for each time point) were treated with SrRan by gavage at a dose of 625 mg/kg/day, 5 days/week. This dose level leads to blood strontium concentration close to the level in human blood after a therapeutic dose of 2 g/day [28]. The three control groups received 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose aqueous solution by gavage 5 days a week for 4, 8, and 12 weeks with volumes corresponding to those administered in the SrRan-treated group.

2.2. Surgery

Animals were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylasine (10 mg/kg) administered as an intraperitoneal injection. Skin of both legs was shaved and cleaned with 70% ethanol. Under aseptic conditions, an anterior 10 mm incision was made to gain access to the proximal medial section of the tibia metaphysis. A standardized drill-hole defect (2.5 mm diameter, 2 mm depth, and approximately 10 mm3 total volume) was created in the proximal tibia secondary spongiosa of both legs using a dental burr under saline irrigation. The proximal limit of bone defect was delimited by a virtual line perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia and crossing the anterior edge of the growth plate centrally, which is curved both anteriorly and inferiorly in this central region. A second anatomical landmark was a virtual line from the inferior border of the tendinous insertion on the proximal anterior tibial crest to a medial tendinous insertion likely corresponding to the pes anserinus in humans. The bone defect was performed midway between these two tendinous insertions. Rotatory speed did not exceed 2000 rpm, and drilling was accompanied by profuse saline irrigation to avoid thermal bone necrosis. After creation of the bone defect, the skin was sutured using a 3–0 resorbable polyglactic suture (Vicryr; Ethicon; Spreitenbach, Switzerland). Blood was sampled before surgery and at the moment of sacrifice from the tip of the tail and the aorta, respectively. At the end of the experiments, all rats were sacrificed by an overdose of ketamine hydrochloride.

2.3. Microcomputerized Tomography (μCt)

Tibias were carefully excised immediately after death and frozen at −20°C in plastic bags. Bones were thawed slowly at 4°C and maintained at room temperature the night before μCt analysis. Each proximal tibia was scanned using μCt (μCt 40, Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) as previously described [32, 33]. In summary, three-dimensional images of each tibia were acquired with a voxel size of 20 μm in all spatial directions. No sample preparation was needed and tibia bones were secured in a cylindrical sample holder in NaCl solution. The resulting gray-scale images were segmented using a low-pass filter to remove noise and a fixed threshold to extract the mineralized bone phase. For detection of trabecular bone filling the defect, segmentation parameters were set to sigma: 0.8 voxels, support: 1, and threshold: 3.08 cm−1. The resolution was set to (500 projections with 1024 samples each), and a middle value slice thickness and increment to 21 μm.

Trabecular bone was analysed by setting the volume of interest (VOI) as a circular band of 2.5 mm drawn on a slice-based method, starting from the first slice from the external bone surface containing no cortical bone and moving 30 slices dorsally, including avoidance of undrilled bone. Each slice was calculated directly from the binarized VOI. Total volume (TV) is the volume of the whole sample examined. Bone volume (BV) was calculated using tetrahedrons corresponding to the enclosed volume of the triangulated surface. Mean trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) was determined from the local thickness at each voxel representing bone [34]. Trabecular number (Tb.N) was calculated by taking the inverse of the mean distance between the middle axis of the structure and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) by applying the technique used for the direct thickness calculation to the non-bone parts of the 3D image. Connectivity density based on Euler number (Conn. D) and the structure model index (SMI) were calculated.

BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N, Tb.Sp, and SMI were also analysed within a subregion of trabecular bone bordering the defect enclosed in a circular stripe of 0.45 mm and excluding the central cavity (Figure 1). For this analysis, the same parameters of segmentation as above were applied; the region of interest was selected within the volume of 30 slices previously analysed.

Scans were successively reformatted to the axial cuts to measure the thickness of cortical bone bridging the defect. The contours of cortical bone were semiautomatically drawned within 90 slices along the long axis of the tibia, exclusively including the cortices sealing the gap. For cortical bone, the segmentation parameters were set to sigma: 0.8 voxels, support: 1, and threshold: 3.85 cm−1.

2.4. Nanomechanical Testing

Right tibias were embedded in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (8.00590.2500 Merck, Hohenbrunn, Germany) and blocks were then transversally cut in two pieces at the level of the bone defect using a diamond wire saw (Well Mod 3242-3, Well Diamond Wire Saws SA, Le Locle, Switzerland). The face of the transverse cuts was polished and finished with 0.25 μm diamond solution. After these preparation steps, specimens were frozen at −20°C. The night before the nanomechanical test, specimens were slowly thawed at 4°C, maintained at room temperature, and immersed in saline solution during the whole analysis. Nanoindentation was performed using a nanohardness tester (NHT; CSM Instruments, Peseux, Switzerland). In this test, force-displacement of a pyramidal diamond indenter that was pushed onto the bone was recorded. The nanoindentation tests included five indents within the bone defect and five indents at the junction between old and new formed bone in cortical bone (Figure 2). All the indents were performed at distance of the junction of the PMMA and bone. Indents were made up to 900 nm maximum depth applying an approximate strain rate of 0.066 1/s for both loading and unloading. At maximum load, a 5-s holding period was applied, and the limit of the maximum allowable thermal drift was set to 0.1 nm/s.

2.5. Wavelength X-Ray Dispersive Spectroscopy (WDS)

WDS was performed to evaluate the surface distribution of Sr, Ca, and P in the bone of five representative samples from the SrRan-treated and vehicle group (12 weeks of treatment only). Semiquantitative analyses were performed in profiles selected in trabecular bone at the edge with the defect in two representative samples for each treatment group (vehicle and SrRan) using a JEOL 8200 X-ray spectrometer (JEOL 8200 electron microprobe, Ohio, USA). The JEOL 8200 electron microprobe has five wavelength dispersive crystal focusing spectrometers. The crystals used here were pentaerythritol (PET), thallium acid phthalate (TAP), and synthetic 45 Å multilayer W/Si (LDE1). The primary electron beam energy was operated at 15 KeV, the electron beam current was 10 nA, and the beam spot size was ~10 × 8 μm2. The bone samples utilized were embedded in PMMA and cut transversally in the middle, across the defect. The surface was polished, finishing with 0.25 μm diamond solution, and coated with carbon to render them conductors and to avoid surface charging.

2.6. Biochemical Assay

Plasma insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was measured by an ELISA kit (Immunodiagnostic Systems, Thebarton, Australia), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All results were expressed as means ± SEM. For normally distributed data, significant differences were identified by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher’s post hoc test. Alternatively, a Mann-Whitney test was performed, and the level of significance was set to .

3. Results

3.1. Effect of SrRan on the Geometry of Cortical Bone Bordering the Defect

After 4 weeks of SrRan treatment, cortical bone thickness (+55%; ) was higher than vehicle time-matched controls (Figure 3). μCT analysis showed that the cortical bone healing area over the defect was almost completely restored in SrRan-treated rats at 4 weeks; at 8 and 12 weeks, the +12% and +10% higher cortical thicknesses were not significant. After 12 weeks, the cortical bone bridging the defect was fully repaired in both SrRan- and vehicle-treated rats.

3.2. Effect of SrRan on the Microarchitecture of Trabecular Bone Healing the Defect

Most parameters of bone microarchitecture, such as BV/TV, Conn.D, and Tb.Th, were higher after 4 weeks of SrRan treatment (Figure 4 and Table 1) compared to the controls. A consistently higher trabecular BV/TV was observed at the early time point of 4 weeks and this difference became significant after 8 and 12 weeks of SrRan treatment (+72% (NS) and +240% [] and +168% [] at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively, when compared to the time-matched controls). Tb.Th also followed the same trend as BV/TV at 4, 8, or 12 weeks of treatment (+13.6%, +31%, and +28%, resp.). Along with the higher Tb.Th, the SMI, corresponding to 0 and 3 for an ideal plate and rod structure, respectively, was lower by −19%, −35%, and −34% (4, 8, and 12 weeks, resp.) in SrRan-treated rats versus time-matched controls. A higher Conn.D was observed also after 4 weeks of SrRan treatment (+86%) and an even larger difference was detected after 8 and 12 weeks (245%, ; 228%; , resp.) when compared to vehicle-treated rats. However, Tb.N was not increased at any time point following SrRan treatment. When analyzing trabecular bone by μCT within a circular band of 0.45 mm at the periphery of the defect and omitting the central part of the cavity, the average BV/TV values measured in SrRan-treated rats were all above 20% (Figure 1 and Table 2). These values are higher than BV/TV measured in the secondary spongiosa of proximal tibiae in intact rats of the same age and strain (BV/TV = 15% [35]). By 12 weeks, higher BV/TV in this region was associated with significantly higher Tb.N. and Tb.Th and lower Tb.Sp and SMI versus controls.

Trabecular boneTreatmentTime of treatment
4 weeks8 weeks12 weeks

Conn. D (1)vehicle40.56 ± 11.0814.70 ± 4.4922.86 ± 6.74
SrRan75.24 ± 15.1550.73 ± 7.64*74.87 ± 11.62*

TbN (1/mm)vehicle4.38 ± 0.333.75 ± 0.143.91 ± 0.16
SrRan4.60 ± 0.224.20 ± 0.10°4.41 ± 0.17

TbTh (1/mm)vehicle0.066 ± 0.0050.062 ± 0.0030.064 ± 0.005
SrRan0.075 ± 0.0050.081 ± 0.002#0.082 ± 0.002*

SMI (1)vehicle2.78 ± 0.273.30 ± 0.242.88 ± 0.30
SrRan2.25 ± 0.282.14 ± 0.13*1.91 ± 0.23°

Averages ± SEM; Mann-Whitney; , , versus time-matched vehicle.

Trabecular bone bordering defectTreatmentTime of treatment
4 weeks8 weeks12 weeks

BV/TV (%)vehicle16.86 ± 4.6114.16 ± 1.4514.50 ± 1.86
SrRan26.57 ± 4.06°22.84 ± 1.77°27.86 ± 2.92*

TbN (1/mm)vehicle5.00 ± 0.374.40 ± 0.114.46 ± 0.28
SrRan5.66 ± 0.404.99 ± 0.215.21 ± 0.18°

TbTh (mm)vehicle0.072 ± 0.0070.082 ± 0.0090.074 ± 0.003
SrRan0.083 ± 0.0040.084 ± 0.0020.084 ± 0.003°

TbSp (mm)vehicle0.217 ± 0.0150.231 ± 0.0060.248 ± 0.014
SrRan0.189 ± 0.0140.216 ± 0.0100.196 ± 0.008*

SMI (1)vehicle2.487 ± 0.4542.767 ± 0.1372.505 ± 0.116
SrRan1.640 ± 0.3681.706 ± 0.177°1.544 ± 0.251°

Averages ± SEM; Mann-Whitney; ; versus time-matched vehicle.
3.3. Effect of SrRan on Material Level Properties of Cortical Bone Spreading from the Defect Limit

By 4 weeks of SrRan treatment a higher elastic modulus, hardness, and working energy of cortical bone bridging the defect (+37%, ; +43%, ; and +30%, , resp.) were observed when compared to vehicle-treated rats (Table 3). Working energy was also higher after 8 weeks of SrRan treatment, whereas values by week 12 were close to those observed in time-matched vehicles. By weeks 8 and 12, elastic modulus and hardness of cortical bone were similarly higher both in SrRan- and vehicle-treated groups. Bone material level properties were higher in cortical bone as compared to trabecular bone. The bone tissue organization and mineralization as well as intensity of mechanical loading [36] could account for this difference between cortical and trabecular bone.

Cortical boneTreatmentTime of treatment
4 weeks8 weeks12 weeks

Modulus (gPa)Vehicle8.31 ± 0.3910.55 ± 0.3714.87 ± 0.43
SrRan11.39 ± 0.60#11.00 ± 0.7114.40 ± 0.67

Hardness (mPa)Vehicle275.1 ± 17.8291.3 ± 13.9477.4 ± 23.0
SrRan394.5 ± 31.3*347.5 ± 29.3482.8 ± 29.9

Working Energy (pJ)Vehicle1970.3 ± 96.41933.2 ± 68.43076.4 ± 102.6
SrRan2561.6 ± 113.1#2269.5 ± 142.3°3105.5 ± 123.3

Averages ± SEM; 2-way ANOVA; ; ; versus vehicle.
3.4. Effect of SrRan on Material Level Properties of Trabecular Bone Broadening from the Defect Limit

By 4 weeks, SrRan treatment was associated with higher elastic modulus, hardness, and working energy of trabecular bone expanding from the defect rim (+26%, ; +26%, ; and +23%, , resp.) when compared to the time-matched vehicle-treated rats (Table 4). Elastic modulus, hardness, and working energy were higher by weeks 8 and 12 in both SrRan and vehicle groups; working energy remained significantly higher by week 12 of SrRan treatment when compared to time-matched vehicles.

Trabecular boneTreatmentTime of treatment
4 weeks8 weeks12 weeks

Modulus (gPa)vehicle9.17 ± 0.3911.20 ± 0.5313.50 ± 0.49
SrRan11.51 ± 0.58*11.66 ± 0.6013.85 ± 0.43

Hardness (mPa)vehicle356.1 ± 24.2507.31 ± 27.22588.38 ± 19.48
SrRan449.6 ± 28.6°534.51 ± 29.04640-67 ± 20.06

Working Energy (pJ)vehicle2224.8 ± 135.92769.7 ± 139.43365.7 ± 104.2
SrRan2725.6 ± 145.8°3006.3 ± 152.83758.2 ± 97.4*

Averages ± SEM; 2 ways ANOVA; ; versus vehicle.
3.5. Wavelength X-Ray Dispersive Spectroscopy

Elemental mapping of Sr in the bone defect of two representative samples at week 12 is presented in Figure 5. The mean atomic percentage of Sr, Ca, and P resulted from the evaluation of profiles selected in trabecular bone extending from the periphery of the defect. Sr was detected in trabecular bone healing the defect and all around in cortical bone, mainly in zones characterized by new and less mineralized bone. Sr was only detected in traces in time-matched vehicle rats. The mean percentages of Ca and P, as well as the ratio of Ca/P, were similar in SrRan and vehicle-treated rats.

3.6. Effect of SrRan Treatment on Insulin-Growth Factor (IGF-I) Level in Serum

Overall, the concentration of IGF-I lowered in serum harvested at the time of the euthanasia versus values measured before surgery (Table 5). Nevertheless, by weeks 4 and 8 the concentration of IGF-I was higher in SrRan-treated rats compared to time-matched vehicle animals, and by week 12, IGF-I levels were similar in both SrRan- and vehicle-treated groups.

TreatmentSurgery4 weeks8 weeks12 weeks

vehicle1181.1 ± 87.7946.8 ± 50.8*
SrRan1216.6 ± 77.91056.6 ± 49.1°

vehicle1034.1 ± 71.6774.9 ± 82.0**
SrRan1146.7 ± 47.9966.2 ± 45.6°°

vehicle1196.7 ± 101.9882.39 ± 79.37
SrRan1064.5 ± 79.2886.39 ± 67.44

Averages (IGF-I; ng/mL) ± SEM.
4 wks: compared to vehicle (*) or SrRan group at surgery (°).
8 wks: compared to vehicle (**) or SrRan group at surgery (°°).
12 wks: compared to vehicle group at surgery .

4. Discussion

An accelerated repair of a bone defect represents a challenge to reconstruct bone integrity in individuals in whom bone loss is the consequence of traumatic events, surgery, or tooth extraction. SrRan has demonstrated some uncoupling between bone formation and bone resorption, as shown by a series of studies in vitro and in vivo [2935, 37]. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the systemic administration of SrRan accelerates the healing of a bone defect drilled in rat secondary spongiosa of proximal tibiae. SrRan was orally administered at a dose of 625 mg/kg (5 days/week), and effects on bone defect repair were evaluated after 4, 8, and 12 weeks and subsequently compared with time-matched vehicle animals.

The μCt analysis showed that the mean cortical thickness was higher after 4 weeks of SrRan administration when compared to vehicle animals; in the latter group, the cortical shell bridging the defect still presented a few holes by 8 and 12 weeks, the cortices were thicker and formed a continuous shell in both SrRan- and vehicle-treated rats, completely sealing the defect. A former study showed that prolonged SrRan treatment increases bone diameter by inducing periosteal apposition and decreasing bone endocortical resorption [26]. The novelty of this study is in the evidence that SrRan accelerates the repair of damaged cortical bone. However, the mechanism by which SrRan influences the expansion of the cortical shell over the defect requires complementary investigations, that is, the histomorphometric quantification of parameters of bone formation/resorption.

The kinetics of trabecular bone healing of the defect seem to be delayed compared to those of cortical bone. Indeed, a significant increase in the parameters of cancellous bone microarchitecture was observed after 8 and 12 weeks of SrRan treatment versus time-matched vehicle animals, that is, 4 weeks later compared to the cortical bone. BV/TV and Tb.Th of cancellous bone filling the defect cavity were higher after SrRan treatment compared to vehicles. By contrast, the same region was still almost completely devoid of trabecular bone in rats treated with vehicle during the 12 weeks. This evidence clearly indicates that SrRan administration enhances the healing of a bone defect in rat tibiae. These observations are in agreement with other studies showing that SrRan treatment of rats carrying endosseous titanium cylinders in the proximal tibia increased the trabecular bone BV/TV at the bone-titanium interface, enhancing implant osseointegration [38].

The 3D reconstructions of μCt scans showed that trabecular bone heals from the periphery toward the centre of the defect. When excluding the central cavity, the analysis of trabecular bone located in a circular subregion of 0.45 mm at the periphery of the defect showed a significant increase in BV/TV in all groups of SrRan-treated rats. The mass and microarchitecture of cancellous bone after 12 weeks of SrRan administration were consistently improved when compared to values measured within the proximal tibia metaphysis of intact rats [35]. This suggests that SrRan administration improves the structure of bone healing the defect versus normal, undamaged bone. In addition, SrRan administration for a longer period of time might further improve the microarchitecture of bone extending through the central cavity from the periphery of the defect.

The SrRan-dependent increase in bone strength relies on the sum of positive effects on both microarchitecture and material properties as shown by a finite element analysis [39]. In the present study, the nanoindentation analysis showed a clear effect of SrRan on material level properties of both cortical and trabecular bone repairing the defect when compared to vehicle-treated rats. The increase in elastic modulus, hardness, and working energy was mainly observed after 4 weeks of SrRan administration versus time-matched vehicle animals, in both cortical and trabecular bone healing the defect. An effect of SrRan on working energy persisted in trabecular bone after 12-week treatment. In previous reports, it was shown that SrRan administration also improves bone strength by increasing the elastic modulus, hardness, and working energy in rat vertebrae [25, 26, 28]. A similar positive effect of SrRan on tissue quality was also observed in bone growing on implant surfaces [38]. To our knowledge, our findings provide evidence for the first time that systemic administration of SrRan improves the quality of healing bone in the context of a bone defect.

The incorporation of Sr in cancellous bone filling the defect was confirmed by WDS, while only traces were detectable in vehicle animals. In agreement with former reports, Sr was more concentrated in younger and less mineralized trabecular bone, including the cortical endosteal surface [40]. So far, the mechanism by which SrRan ameliorates tissue properties is unclear. Bone sustainability to mechanical deformation at nanometer scale is regulated by the interaction between collagen, noncollagenous protein, and mineral phase, which allows the load to be efficiently transferred across multiple structural levels through the slipping of matrix-fibrillar interfaces [41].

We hypothesised that the mechanism by which SrRan affects bone material properties may rely on a chemical effect on bone components (matrix and/or mineral phases), in addition to the biological effect on bone cells. This is supported by an ex vivo experiment, which showed the association between Sr content and the improvement of tissue properties in bone sections immerged in SrCl2 solution [42]. The unfolding of sacrificial bonds represents one possibility which allows bone tissue to withstand deformation. These interactions between mineral and organic phases act as a kind of “glue” opposing the separation of mineralized collagen fibrils [43, 44]. The adhesion of Sr to the hydrated layer may account for the improvement in tissue properties, as was proved by indentation performed under dry conditions in which no significant difference was observed between SrRan and vehicle-treated rats [26]. In addition, the hydration level of bone influences the interaction of the organic matrix with the mineral phase and dehydration is associated with a degradation of the plastic properties [45].

Previous findings have shown that Sr is mainly deposited in young bone, within the hydrated layer surrounding the hydroxyapatite crystals [46]. By contrast, the uptake of Sr ions in crystals in place of Ca++ ions is quite a rare event to induce an important change in bone material properties. This observation is of major importance as only young bone was formed in the defect in our model. We observed that only a borderline modification of the Ca/P ratio could be observed under SrRan treatment compared to the control group, and this observation is in agreement with the fact that Sr is essentially integrated into the hydrated layer and is rare in the hydroxyapatite crystal.

The mechanisms by which SrRan affects bone formation and trabecular bone remodelling in our model of bone defect were not specifically investigated in the present study. Multiple scenarios may be envisaged by referring to published in vitro and in vivo studies. The effect of SrRan on the production of hormones known to control cortical bone growth, such as IGF-I, might be incriminated. SrRan was demonstrated to increase plasma IGF-I in patients [47] and in rats [26]. In our study, SrRan administration was not associated with a significant change in plasma level of IGF-I and only a trend was observed. However, it cannot be excluded that SrRan might influence the local expression of IGF-I in bone. Interestingly, recent evidence has shown that the overexpression of IGF-I in osteoblasts of transgenic mice protected the bone microstructure from the negative effect of a low protein diet, despite the decrease in circulating levels of IGF-I [48]. The effect of SrRan on the fate of multipotent progenitors migrating through the site of injury at the time of blood vessel invasion during the early phases of bone defect repair must be taken into consideration. Indeed, it was shown that bone marrow stromal cells derived from ovariectomized rats treated with SrRan preferentially differentiate versus the osteoblastic lineage [49]. A more recent study showed that SrRan administration in mice lowers bone marrow adiposity and increases trabecular BV/TV in proximal tibia metaphysic [50]. Accordingly, in our model of tibial defect, SrRan may promote osteogenesis by downregulating genes driving the commitment of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells versus the adipocyte lineage and inducing genes involved in early phases of osteoblastogenesis. However another possible explanation may be that SrRan could positively influence defect vascularization by modulating the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from osteoblasts. In a recent study, it was shown in vitro that the release of strontium from strontium-doped calcium polyphosphate scaffolds was associated with the increase of VEGF mRNA and protein secretion from cultures of differentiating osteoblasts [51]. However, the association between SrRan administration and vasculogenesis in vivo has not been demonstrated yet.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the systemic administration of SrRan accelerates the healing of a bone defect created in rat proximal tibiae, with a significant effect on cortical thickness at 4 weeks and on trabecular microarchitecture at 8 and 12 weeks versus vehicle animals. Sr is integrated both in cortical and in trabecular bone healing the defect in SrRan-treated rats and improves the bone material level properties of the healing bone mainly after 4 weeks of treatment. These results open up new perspectives for the use of SrRan in clinical studies as a pharmacologic agent with a potential beneficial effect on bone defect repair.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors would like to thank S. Clement for animal management and technical assistance, I. Badoud for biomechanical testing, and Dr F. Bussy (University Lausanne, Switzerland) for wavelength X-ray dispersive spectroscopy testing.


  1. M. Schürch, R. Rizzoli, D. Slosman, L. Vadas, P. Vergnaud, and J. Bonjour, “Protein supplements increase serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels and attenuate proximal femur bone loss in patients with recent hip fracture. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 128, no. 10, pp. 801–809, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. E. Oostlander, N. Bravenboer, E. Sohl et al., “Histomorphometric analysis reveals reduced bone mass and bone formation in patients with quiescent crohn's disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 116–123, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Kasahara, S. Imai, H. Kojima et al., “Malfunction of bone marrow-derived osteoclasts and the delay of bone fracture healing in diabetic mice,” Bone, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 617–625, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. C. Gerstenfeld, D. M. Cullinane, G. L. Barnes, D. T. Graves, and T. A. Einhorn, “Fracture healing as a post-natal developmental process: molecular, spatial, and temporal aspects of its regulation,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 873–884, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. P. Lutolf, F. E. Weber, H. G. Schmoekel et al., “Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 513–518, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. H. Holstein, M. Orth, C. Scheuer et al., “Erythropoietin stimulates bone formation, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis in a femoral segmental defect model in mice,” Bone, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1037–1045, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. P. Bruder, A. A. Kurth, M. Shea, W. C. Hayes, N. Jaiswal, and S. Kadiyala, “Bone regeneration by implantation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Cancedda, M. Mastrogiacomo, G. Bianchi, A. Derubeis, A. Muraglia, and R. Quarto, “Bone marrow stromal cells and their use in regenerating bone,” Novartis Foundation Symposium, vol. 249, pp. 133–147, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Y. Yang, B. Hallgrimsson, and E. E. Putnins, “Craniofacial defect regeneration using engineered bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 74–85, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. A. Matos, U. Tannuri, and R. Guarniero, “The effect of zoledronate during bone healing,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Li, S. Mori, Y. Kaji, T. Mashiba, J. Kawanishi, and H. Norimatsu, “Effect of bisphosphonate (incadronate) on fracture healing of long bones in rats,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 969–979, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Nagashima, A. Sakai, S. Uchida, S. Tanaka, M. Tanaka, and T. Nakamura, “Bisphosphonate (YM529) delays the repair of cortical bone defect after drill-hole injury by reducing terminal differentiation of osteoblasts in the mouse femur,” Bone, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 502–511, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. M. McDonald, S. Dulai, C. Godfrey, N. Amanat, T. Sztynda, and D. G. Little, “Bolus or weekly zoledronic acid administration does not delay endochondral fracture repair but weekly dosing enhances delays in hard callus remodeling,” Bone, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 653–662, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Saito, A. Shiraishi, M. Ito et al., “Comparison of effects of alfacalcidol and alendronate on mechanical properties and bone collagen cross-links of callus in the fracture repair rat model,” Bone, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1170–1179, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. E. Komatsu, K. A. Brune, H. Liu et al., “Longitudinal in vivo analysis of the region-specific efficacy of parathyroid hormone in a rat cortical defect model,” Endocrinology, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 1570–1579, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Komatsubara, S. Mori, T. Mashiba et al., “Human parathyroid hormone (1-34) accelerates the fracture healing process of woven to lamellar bone replacement and new cortical shell formation in rat femora,” Bone, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 678–687, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. B. Chalidis, C. Tzioupis, E. Tsiridis, and P. V. Giannoudis, “Enhancement of fracture healing with parathyroid hormone: preclinical studies and potential clinical applications,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 441–449, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. E. Compston, “Skeletal actions of intermittent parathyroid hormone: effects on bone remodelling and structure,” Bone, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1447–1452, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. P. J. Marie, M. T. Garba, M. Hott, and L. Miravet, “Effect of low doses of stable strontium on bone metabolism in rats,” Mineral and Electrolyte Metabolism, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–13, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  20. P. J. Marie, M. Hott, D. Modrowski et al., “An uncoupling agent containing strontium prevents bone loss by depressing bone resorption and maintaining bone formation in estrogen-deficient rats,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 607–615, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  21. E. Canalis, M. Hott, P. Deloffre, Y. Tsouderos, and P. J. Marie, “The divalent strontium salt S12911 enhances bone cell replication and bone formation in vitro,” Bone, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 517–523, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. P. J. Marie, “Optimizing bone metabolism in osteoporosis: insight into the pharmacologic profile of strontium ranelate,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 14, supplement 3, pp. S9–12, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  23. E. Bonnelye, A. Chabadel, F. Saltel, and P. Jurdic, “Dual effect of strontium ranelate: Stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and inhibition of osteoclast formation and resorption in vitro,” Bone, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 129–138, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. Delannoy, D. Bazot, and P. J. Marie, “Long-term treatment with strontium ranelate increases vertebral bone mass without deleterious effect in mice,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 906–911, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. P. Ammann, V. Shen, B. Robin, Y. Mauras, J. Bonjour, and R. Rizzoli, “Strontium ranelate improves bone resistance by increasing bone mass and improving architecture in intact female rats,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2012–2020, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. Ammann, I. Badoud, S. Barraud, R. Dayer, and R. Rizzoli, “Strontium ranelate treatment improves trabecular and cortical intrinsic bone tissue quality, a determinant of bone strength,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1419–1425, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Buehler, P. Chappuis, J. L. Saffar, Y. Tsouderos, and A. Vignery, “Strontium ranelate inhibits bone resorption while maintaining bone formation in alveolar bone in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis),” Bone, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 176–179, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. D. Bain, C. Jerome, V. Shen, I. Dupin-Roger, and P. Ammann, “Strontium ranelate improves bone strength in ovariectomized rat by positively influencing bone resistance determinants,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1417–1428, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Y. F. Li, E. Luo, G. Feng, S. S. Zhu, J. H. Li, and J. Hu, “Systemic treatment with strontium ranelate promotes tibial fracture healing in ovariectomized rats,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1889–1897, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. E. Ozturan, B. Demir, I. Yucel, H. Cakici, F. Yilmaz, and A. Haberal, “Effect of strontium ranelate on fracture healing in the osteoporotic rats,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 138–142, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. B. Habermann, K. Kafchitsas, G. Olender, P. Augat, and A. Kurth, “Strontium ranelate enhances callus strength more than PTH 1-34 in an osteoporotic rat model of fracture healing,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 82–89, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Laib, O. Barou, L. Vico, M. H. Lafage-Proust, C. Alexandre, and P. Rügsegger, “3D micro-computed tomography of trabecular and cortical bone architecture with application to a rat model of immobilisation osteoporosis,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 326–332, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  33. R. Müller, M. Hahn, M. Vogel, G. Delling, and P. Rüegsegger, “Morphometric analysis of noninvasively assessed bone biopsies: comparison of high-resolution computed tomography and histologic sections,” Bone, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 215–220, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. T. Hildebrand and P. Rüegsegger, “Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Mekraldi, A. Toromanoff, R. Rizzoli, and P. Ammann, “Pamidronate prevents bone loss and decreased bone strength in adult female and male rats fed an isocaloric low-protein diet,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1365–1371, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. Hengsberger, P. Ammann, B. Legros, R. Rizzoli, and P. Zysset, “Intrinsic bone tissue properties in adult rat vertebrae: modulation by dietary protein,” Bone, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 134–141, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. N. Alegre, C. Ribeiro, C. Sousa, J. Correia, L. Silva, and L. de Almeida, “Possible benefits of strontium ranelate in complicated long bone fractures,” Rheumatology International, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 439–443, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. Maïmoun, T. C. Brennan, I. Badoud, V. Dubois-Ferriere, R. Rizzoli, and P. Ammann, “Strontium ranelate improves implant osseointegration,” Bone, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1436–1441, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. K. Boyd, E. Szabo, and P. Ammann, “Increased bone strength is associated with improved bone microarchitecture in intact female rats treated with strontium ranelate: a finite element analysis study,” Bone, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1109–1116, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. Boivin, P. Deloffre, B. Perrat et al., “Strontium distribution and interactions with bone mineral in monkey iliac bone after strontium salt (S 12911) administration,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1302–1311, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  41. H. S. Gupta, J. Seto, W. Wagermaier, P. Zaslansky, P. Boesecke, and P. Fratzl, “Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 47, pp. 17741–17746, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Cattani-Lorente, R. Rizzoli, and P. Ammann, “In vitro bone exposure to strontium improves bone material level properties,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 7005–7013, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. G. E. Fantner, T. Hassenkam, J. H. Kindt et al., “Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture,” Nature Materials, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 612–616, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. G. E. Fantner, E. Oroudjev, G. Schitter et al., “Sacrificial bonds and hidden length: unraveling molecular mesostructures in tough materials,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1411–1418, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. S. Nyman, A. Roy, X. Shen, R. L. Acuna, J. H. Tyler, and X. Wang, “The influence of water removal on the strength and toughness of cortical bone,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 931–938, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. Farlay, G. Boivin, G. Panczer, A. Lalande, and P. J. Meunier, “Long-term strontium ranelate administration in monkeys preserves characteristics of bone mineral crystals and degree of mineralization of bone,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1569–1578, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. I. Gulhan, S. Bilgili, R. Gunaydin, S. Gulhan, and C. Posaci, “The effect of strontium ranelate on serum insulin like growth factor-1 and leptin levels in osteoporotic post-menopausal women: a prospective study,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 278, no. 5, pp. 437–441, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. T. C. Brennan-Speranza, R. Rizzoli, B. E. Kream, C. Rosen, and P. Ammann, “Selective osteoblast overexpression of IGF-I in mice prevents low protein-induced deterioration of bone strength and material level properties,” Bone, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1073–1079, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Peng, X. S. Liu, T. Wang et al., “In vivo anabolic effect of strontium on trabecular bone was associated with increased osteoblastogenesis of bone marrow stromal cells,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1208–1214, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Fournier, A. Perrier, M. Thomas et al., “Reduction by strontium of the bone marrow adiposity in mice and repression of the adipogenic commitment of multipotent C3H10T1/2 cells,” Bone, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 499–509, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. F. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Yu, Y. Xu, T. Feng, and D. Ren, “In vitro study in stimulating the secretion of angiogenic growth factors of strontium-doped calcium polyphosphate for bone tissue engineering,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 683–692, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Giovanna Zacchetti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2237 Views | 688 Downloads | 13 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.