Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014, Article ID 610591, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/610591
Research Article

Effect of Engaging Trainees by Assessing Peer Performance: A Randomised Controlled Trial Using Simulated Patient Scenarios

1Centre for Clinical Education (CEKU), University of Copenhagen and Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet, Teilumbygningen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
2Department of Anesthesia and The Wilson Centre, 200 Elizabeth Street, 1ES-565, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4
3Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet and Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Received 2 November 2013; Revised 23 April 2014; Accepted 29 April 2014; Published 20 May 2014

Academic Editor: Tommaso Pellis

Copyright © 2014 Charlotte Loumann Krogh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Carling, “Are graduate doctors adequately prepared to manage acutely unwell patients?” The Clinical Teacher, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 102–105, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. B. Smith and N. Poplett, “Knowledge of aspects of acute care in trainee doctors,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 78, no. 920, pp. 335–338, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. R. Tallentire, S. E. Smith, K. Wylde, and H. S. Cameron, “Are medical graduates ready to face the challenges of Foundation training?” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 87, no. 1031, pp. 590–595, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Thim, N. H. V. Krarup, E. L. Grove, C. V. Rohde, and B. Lofgren, “Initial assessment and treatment with the Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) approach,” International Journal of General Medicine, vol. 5, pp. 117–121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. J. Goldacre, K. Taylor, and T. W. Lambert, “Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 10, no. 1, article no. 78, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. M. Smith, G. D. Perkins, I. Bullock, and J. F. Bion, “Undergraduate training in the care of the acutely ill patient: a literature review,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 901–907, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Ruesseler, M. Weinlich, M. P. Müller, C. Byhahn, I. Marzi, and F. Walcher, “Simulation training improves ability to manage medical emergencies,” Emergency Medicine Journal, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 734–738, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Okuda, E. O. Bryson, S. DeMaria Jr. et al., “The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence?” The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 330–343, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Wulf, C. Shea, and R. Lewthwaite, “Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors,” Medical Education, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. A. Magill, Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 8th edition, 2007.
  11. J. J. Norcini, “Peer assessment of competence,” Medical Education, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 539–543, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Evans, G. Elwyn, and A. Edwards, “Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians,” British Medical Journal, vol. 328, no. 7450, pp. 1240–1243, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. M. Epstein, “Assessment in medical education,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 4, pp. 387–396, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. A. Callahan, M. Hojat, and J. S. Gonnella, “Volunteer bias in medical education research: an empirical study of over three decades of longitudinal data,” Medical Education, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 746–753, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. B. Kromann, M. L. Jensen, and C. Ringsted, “The effect of testing on skills learning,” Medical Education, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. L. Jensen, F. Mondrup, F. Lippert, and C. Ringsted, “Using e-learning for maintenance of ALS competence,” Resuscitation, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 903–908, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. DeMaria Jr., E. O. Bryson, T. J. Mooney et al., “Adding emotional stressors to training in simulated cardiopulmonary arrest enhances participant performance,” Medical Education, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1006–1015, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. L. Roediger III and J. D. Karpicke, “Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention,” Psychological Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 249–255, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus