Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 872139, 15 pages
Review Article

Glycyrrhizic Acid in the Treatment of Liver Diseases: Literature Review

1Key Laboratory of Liver and Kidney Diseases, Institute of Liver Diseases, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 528 Zhangheng Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203, China
2Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
3Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Molecular Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Received 28 February 2014; Revised 11 April 2014; Accepted 11 April 2014; Published 13 May 2014

Academic Editor: Kota V. Ramana

Copyright © 2014 Jian-yuan Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Glycyrrhizic acid (GA) is a triterpene glycoside found in the roots of licorice plants (Glycyrrhiza glabra). GA is the most important active ingredient in the licorice root, and possesses a wide range of pharmacological and biological activities. GA coupled with glycyrrhetinic acid and 18-beta-glycyrrhetic acid was developed in China or Japan as an anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and antiallergic drug for liver disease. This review summarizes the current biological activities of GA and its medical applications in liver diseases. The pharmacological actions of GA include inhibition of hepatic apoptosis and necrosis; anti-inflammatory and immune regulatory actions; antiviral effects; and antitumor effects. This paper will be a useful reference for physicians and biologists researching GA and will open the door to novel agents in drug discovery and development from Chinese herbs. With additional research, GA may be more widely used in the treatment of liver diseases or other conditions.

1. Introduction

The application of natural compounds in the treatment of refractory diseases is a new trend in modern clinical medicine. Because of their satisfactory efficacy in clinic and low toxicity, more natural products are being used as alternative treatments for many diseases. Many hepatoprotective monomers are derived from natural herbs, especially those from China. Glycyrrhizic acid (GA) is an example of one of these hepatoprotective compounds.

The traditional Chinese medicine Gancao (licorice root) is the dried roots of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch (licorice), G. inflata Bat., or G. glabra L. Gancao which was first described in the Chinese book “Shen Nong Ben Cao Jing” in 200 A.D. as an antidote to toxic substances, ache, and other diseases. Gancao can complement other drugs to reduce toxicity and increase efficacy. The traditional use of Gancao involves a decoction of dried plant roots and stems. Some of the possible therapeutic properties of Gancao include antiarthritic [1], antiallergic [2], antiviral [3], antihepatotoxic [4], anticholinergic [5], antiestrogenic [6], anti-inflammatory [6], antileukemogenic [7], and anticarcinogenic effects [8]. It is commonly used for the treatment of acute and chronic liver injury, viral hepatitis, hepatic steatosis, liver fibrosis, hepatoma, viral myocarditis [9], and other diseases like psoriasis [10] or prostate cancer [11].

The known chemical components of Gancao include saponins (mainly glycyrrhizin (GA), 3.63–13.06%), flavonoids (1.5%), coumarin, alkaloids, polysaccharides, sitosterol, and amino acids [12]. GA (Figure 1) and glycyrrhetinic acid (Figure 2) are well-characterized components of Gancao. GA has been developed as a hepatoprotective drug in China and Japan. GA can generate glycyrrhetinic acid through metabolic processes in the human body. Therefore, the pharmacological effects of GA are essentially the same as glycyrrhetinic acid [13]. GA, also called glycyrrhizin, is a triterpene glycoside from licorice root (Glycyrrhiza glabra) and consists of one molecule of 18-glycyrrhetinic acid and two molecules of glucuronic acid (18-glycyrrhetinic acid-3-O--D-glucuronopyranosyl-()-beta-D-glucuronide) [14, 15]. Glycyrrhizin is considered to be the major active component of Gancao as demonstrated by studies with experimental animal models [16] and clinical studies [17]. GA has been used clinically for more than 20 years in patients with chronic hepatitis in China and Japan [18] and shows a satisfactory therapeutic effect in many other diseases. GA is also widely used as a sweetening and flavoring agent in food.

Figure 1: Chemical structure of glycyrrhizin (GA) and its derivatives.
Figure 2: Chemical structure of glycyrrhetinic acid.

GA is a main substance of licorice, which is one of the most important substances utilized as traditional medicine for almost 2000 years. Moreover, GA was reported to have antiallergic, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities. GA was also found to suppress the rise in fasting blood glucose and insulin levels and improve glucose tolerance. Additionally, GA may act as an antidiabetic substance without inducing side effects, although the mechanism is unclear [19].

GA can form two epimers: -GA and -GA (Figure 3). -GA is derived from -GA by isomerization, and the - and -forms differ only in their –H–, trans-, and cis-configuration, respectively. Some scholars examined their distribution characteristics in rat tissue and found that the concentrations of -GA in the liver and duodenum were significantly higher than those of -GA after i.v. administration. However, the concentrations of -GA in the other tissues were lower than or similar to those of -GA and declined rapidly. This indicates that the protective and anti-inflammatory effects of -GA on the liver may be better than those of -GA [20].

Figure 3: Chemical structure of 18-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18-glycyrrhetinic acid.

Several clinical studies reported that GA was efficacious in the treatment of various types of inflammation (mainly in liver [2130] (Table 1), but also in lung, kidney, intestine, and spinal cord [31]). The most common use of GA is in the treatment of liver disease [32]. GA can reduce steatosis and necrosis of liver cells significantly [33] to inhibit the inter-interstitial inflammation and liver fibrosis and promote cell regeneration. GA has few side effects and is therefore considered to be a drug worth attention and promotion for liver disease.

Table 1: Clinical trials using compound glycyrrhizic acid injection.

2. Mechanisms of GA Effects

2.1. Inhibition of Hepatic Apoptosis and Necrosis

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-) is an important cytokine, which is a key mediator of hepatic apoptosis and necrosis in LPS/D-GaAlN-induced liver failure [34]. Plasma TNF- level is also elevated in patients with chronic hepatitis caused by hepatitis B viral [35] and acute alcoholic hepatitis [36]. Therefore, TNF- plays a key role in the pathogenesis of not only endotoxin-induced experimental liver injury but also many human liver diseases. Caspase-3 activation is an indicator of almost all apoptosis systems [37]. GA has anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects via suppression of TNF- and caspase-3 and these are used to explain the hepatoprotective effect of GA (Table 2) [38]. GA also significantly inhibits the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria into the cytoplasm. The anti-inflammatory activity of GA may rely on the inhibition of release of TNF-, myeloperoxidase activity, and translocation of nuclear factor-B (NF-B) into the nuclei. GA also upregulated the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, implying that it might be able to promote regeneration of liver injury [39]. Activated Kupffer cells are involved in ischemia-reperfusion- (I/R-) induced liver injury and high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) production. GA was shown to inhibit HMGB1 production by Kupffer cells and prevented I/R-induced liver injury [40]. GA could also alleviate I/R-induced [41] and spinal cord [42] injury via this mechanism. In addition, GA conjugates free radicals, which might explain the protective action of GA [43]. For example, GA can be an effective chemopreventive agent against lead acetate mediated hepatic oxidative stress in rats because it binds lead [44]. In concanavalin A- (ConA-) induced mouse model, GA alleviated ConA-induced inflammation and fibrosis progression in livers via inhibition of CD4+ T cell proliferation in response to ConA via the Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathways [45].

Table 2: Mechanism of action of glycyrrhizin compound chemotherapy.
2.2. Anti-Inflammation and Immunity Regulation

GA suppressed interleukin-6 (IL-6) and TNF- production induced by the lipid A moiety of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in RAW264.7 cells. It inhibited lipid A-induced NF-B activation in Ba/F3 cells expressing toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/myeloid differentiation protein-2 (MD-2), cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14), and bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs). GA also inhibited activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPKs), including JNK, p38 protein, and ERK in BMMs. In addition, GA inhibited NF-B activation and IL-6 production induced by paclitaxel, a nonbacterial TLR4 ligand. It attenuated the formation of the LPS-TLR4/MD-2 complexes, resulting in inhibition of homodimerization of TLR4. Therefore, GA modulated the TLR4/MD-2 complex at the receptor level, leading to suppression of LPS-induced activation of signaling cascades and cytokine production. This indicates that GA can attenuate inflammatory responses and modulate innate immune responses [46]. Moreover, GA can prevent the activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription-3 (STAT-3), reduce the upregulation of intercellular cell adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) and P-selectin expression, reduce formation of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) (PAR) and nitrotyrosine, and reduce polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) infiltration. Some observations suggest that broad anti-inflammatory activity of GA is mediated by interaction with the lipid bilayer, thereby attenuating receptor mediated signaling [47]. GA inhibited the lytic pathway of the complement system and may prevent tissue injury caused by the membrane attack complex. Therefore, GA could be a potent agent for suppressing complement-dependent tissue injury in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases [48]. GA can suppress systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) associated anti-inflammatory response manifestation via inhibition of CC chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) production by PMN. It may also have the potential to inhibit anti-inflammatory response-associated opportunistic infections in critically ill patients with severe SIRS [49]. There are also other studies that indicated the same anti-inflammatory mechanisms of GA [50].

2.3. Antiviral Effects

The antiviral mechanisms of GA mainly include the inhibition of viral replication and immunity regulation. GA affects cellular signaling pathways such as protein kinase C and casein kinase II and transcription factors such as activator protein 1 and NF-B. Furthermore, nitrous oxide (NO) inhibits replication of several viruses like Japanese encephalitis virus 4 (a member of the Flaviviridae family), which can also be inhibited by GA. The powerful anti-inflammatory capabilities of GA make it effective in the treatment of various types of hepatitis like viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic hepatitis. GA was found to inhibit the replication of the SARS-associated virus [51]. In the treatment of HCV (hepatitis C virus) infection, GA can inhibit HCV full-length viral particles and HCV core gene expression or function in a dose-dependent manner and have a synergistic effect with interferon [52]. GA is also involved in biliary secretion and excretion. GA can increase hepatic glutathione levels by the inhibition of biliary excretion of glutathione partly through the inhibition of MRP2 [53], an efflux transporter located at the canalicular membrane of a hepatocyte. MRP2 translocates glutathione, LTC4, bilirubin, methotrexate (MTX), glucuronide (e.g., estradiol-17--glucuronide [17G]), or sulfate conjugates and other organic anions from a hepatocyte into the bile canaliculus [5458].

GA can activate certain immune functions, such as IFN production, augmentation of NK cell activity, and modulation of the growth response of lymphocytes via augmentation of IL-2 production [70]. GA can enhance immune function in mice [71]. GA treatment could significantly reduce blood immunoglobulin E (IgE), interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-5 (IL-5), interleukin-6 (IL-6), NO, TNF- levels, and nitrous oxide synthase (NOS) activity dose-dependently. GA could also enhance blood immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin M (IgM), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interleukin-12 (IL-12) levels in AR mice. Gr-1+CD11+b cells are responsible for numerous pathological processes such as T cell dysfunction after severe trauma or major surgery, leading to increased susceptibility to infection [72]. These cells exercise an inhibitory effect on MBD-1 production of EKs mediated via the suppressor molecules CCL-2 and IL-10. GA acts as a potent inhibitor of these cells and therefore restores MBD-1 levels. This restoration affects T cell dysfunction [73]. In thermally injured mice, GA regulates the burn-associated type 2 T cell responses to recover IL-12 and make it unresponsive, thus restoring the impaired cells [74]. GA acts as a promoter of the late signal transduction of T lymphocytes for IL-2 production. The balance between augmenting and suppressing effects might be dependent on the level of stimulation and stage of the cell. Therefore, this determines quality and quantity of the immunomodulatory action of GA [75]. In blood and nasal mucosa, GA consumption decreases antioxidant enzyme activity, lipid peroxidation, Glutathione levels, and IL-4 levels and enhances IFN-γ, thus protecting the nasal mucosa from oxidative injury and improving immunity activity [76].

GA interferes with some viruses, such as H5N1 [77]. The replication and virus-induced proinflammatory gene expression include inhibition of the virus-induced formation of reactive oxygen species and reduced activation of NF-B, JNK, and p38, which are redox-sensitive signaling events known to be relevant for replication.

2.4. Antitumor Effects

CYP enzymes are mainly found in the liver and bowel wall. They are responsible for the bulk of phase I or oxidative metabolism of xenobiotics including dietary toxins, carcinogens, mutagens, and drugs. Administration of GA was able to significantly induce CYP content, which reduces the incidence of cancer [78]. GA can also protect against aflatoxin-induced oxidative stress. The protective effect is likely from its capacity to inhibit the metabolic activation of hepatotoxin, a critical factor in the pathogenesis of chemical-induced carcinogenicity [79]. O-carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles (CMCNP) modified by GA with various substitution degrees can efficiently deliver paclitaxel (PTX) to hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). CMCNP-GA significantly facilitated the increased accumulation of PTX in hepatic tumor tissues and the targeted delivery of PTX to hepatoma carcinoma cells, which resulted in remarkably enhanced in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo antitumor efficacy [80]. In a diethylnitrosamine-treated experimental animal study, as a chemopreventive agent of HCC, modulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis by GA may be associated with inhibition of HCC. Therefore, GA treatment may inhibit the occurrence of HCC [81].

2.5. Inductive Effect of Liver Enzyme Activity

Some studies showed that GA has an inductive effect on CYP3A activity. Therefore, clinicians should pay attention to other drugs catalyzed by CYP3A, especially those substrates with a narrow therapeutic range such as cyclosporine A, to avoid possible clinically significant interactions with GA [82]. Some studies revealed that the area under concentration-time curve and the mean retention time of methotrexate (MTX) were significantly increased by GA, which increases the adverse reactions of MTX [83]. MTX is an antifolate agent, anticancer agent, and immunosuppressant and is commonly used for anticancer chemotherapy [84], rheumatoid arthritis [85], and severe psoriasis [86]. The adverse reactions of MTX include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and hepatotoxicity [87, 88]. A case report showed that combined administration of GA and cilostazol caused pseudoaldosteronism [89]. Therefore, the concurrent use of GA with MTX or cilostazol is not recommended. One report shows a case of hypokalemic rhabdomyolysis secondary to chronic GA intoxication [90]. GA ingestion could therefore potentially aggravate hypokalemia in patients with chronic laxative abuse [91], indicating that the use of GA in hypokalemia should be treated with caution.

3. Other Pharmacological Activities

GA is effective in combating hyperglycemia and associated pathological complications such as hyperlipidemia, abnormal histoarchitectures of different organs, and oxidative stress including hemoglobin-induced iron-mediated free radical reactions. The effects of GA on diabetes-associated changes are almost comparable with those of glibenclamide, a standard antihyperglycemic drug, suggesting a possible use of the herbal agent as a drug to prevent complications of diabetes mellitus [92]. Furthermore, GA regulates renal function through the regulation of water channels [93], and GA administration ameliorates the renal concentrating ability and structural lesions in renal tissues in rats with early-phase of ischemia-acute renal failure [94]. As a reduction inhibitor, GA reduces the therapeutic loss of methylprednisolone produced from methylprednisolone 21-sulfate sodium in the large intestine, thus improving the therapeutic property of the prodrug against inflammatory bowel disease [95]. GA also offers protection from the damage induced by UVB radiation in humans. Therefore, it could be considered as a promising agent for addition to topical formulations for the prevention of skin cancer [96]. GA significantly alleviates asthma symptoms [97], inhibits lung inflammation [98], and relieves acute lung injury [35, 99]. It can directly affect cardiac performance and play a role in myocardial and coronary protection in the presence of cardiovascular diseases [100]. GA may prevent brain tissue damage [101], can be a putative therapeutic drug for neurodegenerative diseases associated with cognitive deficits and neuroinflammation such as Alzheimer’s disease [102], and could suppress ocular hypertension with potential therapeutic effects in eye disease [103]. GA improves resistance to C. albicans infection by inducing CD4+ T cells, which suppress type 2 cytokine production by Th2 cells [104]. GA inhibits activated macrophage (M2M) generation stimulated with neutrophils. The regulation of neutrophil-associated M2M generation by GA may provide a new therapeutic strategy, which could influence the outcome of certain severe infections in hosts with M2M generation [105].

4. Drugs That Include GA

Drugs made with GA have been on the market for many years, and most have important therapeutic uses. Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate injection (TianQing GanMei, Chia Tai Tainqing, JiangSu, China) is one example of a drug with GA. Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate is an effective and safe treatment for chronic liver diseases [106] and is capable of slowing down the progress of pulmonary fibrosis [107]. Moreover, diammonium glycyrrhizinate enteric-coated capsules (TianQing GanPing, Chia Tai Tainqing, JiangSu, China) and diammonium glycyrrhizinate injection (GanLiXin, Chia Tai Tainqing, JiangSu, China) are used for acute and chronic hepatitis associated with elevated alanine aminotransferase. Stronger neo-minophagen C (SNMC, Minophagen Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) is often used in the treatment of chronic liver disease and can improve liver dysfunction [60]. SNMC is a compound GA tablet that includes GA (2 mg) with glycine acid (20 mg) and L-cysteine hydrochloride (1 mg). SNMC has anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, steroid-like, anticomplementary, and immunoregulatory effects.

5. GA Combined with Matrine

GA combined with matrine (Mat) can improve CCL4-induced liver fibrosis effectively. This is evidenced by lower levels of collagen, hyaluronic acid (HA), and laminin (LN), less hepatic stellate cells (HSC) proliferation, collagen I, and HA levels secreted by HSC in vitro with combined therapy compared with GA or Mat alone. GA combination with Mat could protect liver cells and inhibit hepatic fibrosis and may therefore be a safe and effective strategy for improving hepatic fibrosis [108]. In an animal model, GA combined with Mat reduced the mortality of acetaminophen overdosed mice, attenuated acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity, and reduced the number and area of y-GT positive foci, thus protecting liver function and preventing HCC from occurring [109]. Additionally, the combination of GA and cyclosporine was an effective treatment for nonsevere aplastic anemia [110].

6. Common Derivatives of Glycyrrhizin

Glycyrrhetinic acid (3β-hydroxy-11-oxo-oleana-12-en-28-oic acid), the aglycone of GA, stimulates glucose-induced insulin secretion in isolated pancreatic islets. Glycyrrhetinic acid treatment enhances plasma insulin levels and reduces the levels of gluconeogenic enzymes in liver. It is a pentacyclic triterpene acid with numerous biological activities, including anti-inflammatory [63], antiviral [64], antiallergic [65], and antitumor proliferative effects [66].

Glycyrrhetinic acid restrains the proliferation of skin tumors in mice and human breast cancer cells (MCF7) and induces apoptosis of cancer cells. The mechanism of apoptosis might be via increased free level in the cells [111]. Mizushina et al. [112] demonstrated that glycyrrhetinic acid potently inhibited the activity of mammalian polymerases, including pol λ. Glycyrrhetinic acid also reduced TNF- production and NF-B activation and suppressed mouse ear inflammation stimulated by tissue plasminogen activator. Therefore, glycyrrhetinic acid could be an anti-inflammatory agent based on pol λ inhibition.

Another licorice acid derivative is 18-glycyrrhetic acid. The triterpene structure of the HMGB1-binding compound is capable of binding to HMGB1 and altering its proinflammatory properties, inhibiting HMGB1-dependent cyclooxygenase (COX) 2 induction [113]. 18-glycyrrhetic acid has significant antiviral activity against rotavirus replication in vitro, and studies to determine whether 18-glycyrrhetic acid attenuates rotavirus replication in vivo are underway, although the exact mechanism is unclear. However, some reports show that 18-glycyrrhetic acid inhibits NF-B activation, which has been interpreted as 18-glycyrrhetic acid-mediated regulation of the inflammatory response [114]. 18-glycyrrhetinic acid can also inhibit the activity of tyrosine and prevent melanin growth and whitening. Some reports show that 18-glycyrrhetinic acid is likely responsible for amelioration of dysfunction of glutamate transport in astrocytes, and the inhibition of protein kinase C activity might be related to its pharmacological efficacy [67].

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

This review summarized the efficacy of GA in liver disease from clinical trials and its mechanisms of action in vitro and in vivo. Studies indicate that GA could modulate various molecular pathways in liver disease. There are numerous patents for drugs including GA (Table 3). Studies described here highlight the use of GA as a novel chemopreventive agent for liver injury. It is expected that future studies with GA will help to define various molecular mechanisms and targets for inflammation and steatosis. At present, the number of multicenter, large sample, randomized, double-blind, controlled chemoprevention clinical trials with GA is very limited. Extensive clinical research is warranted to evaluate the safety and chemopreventive efficacy of GA alone or in combination with chemotherapy agents.

Table 3: Patents of glycyrrhizin extracts.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (no. 81273729), Major Project of Shanghai Municipal S&T Commission (no. 11DZ1971702), Shanghai Rising-Star Program (08QA14062), Wang Bao-En Hepatic Fibrosis Research fund (20100048), and E-institute of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Project no. E03008). Innovative Research Team in Universities, Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Clinical Medicine, and Key Disciplines of Liver and Gall Bladder Diseases of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People’s Republic of China.


  1. M. L. Gujral, K. Sareen, D. P. Phukan, and M. K. Amma, “Anti-arthritic activity of glycyrrhizin in adrenalectomised rats,” Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 625–629, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Kumagai, M. Nanaboshi, Y. Asanuma, T. Yagura, and K. Nishino, “Effects of glycyrrhizin on thymolytic and immunosuppressive action of cortisone,” Endocrinologia Japonica, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Pompei, O. Flore, M. A. Marccialis, A. Pani, and B. Loddo, “Glycyrrhizic acid inhibits virus growth and inactivates virus particles,” Nature, vol. 281, no. 5733, pp. 689–690, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Kiso, M. Tohkin, H. Hikino, T. Sakamoto, and T. Namba, “Mechanism of antihepatotoxic activity of glycyrrhizin. I: effect on free radical generation and lipid peroxidation,” Planta Medica, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 298–302, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. L. Leroy, Contribution a' l'étude des propriétés pharmacodynamiques dex extraits de reglisse (Glycyrrhiza glabra kgumineuse) [Thesis], University of Paris, Faculty of Medicine, vol. 592, pp. 1–49, 1959.
  6. C. Nieman, “Pharmacological properties of liquorice,” Chemist and Druggist, vol. 177, pp. 741–745, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  7. W. Logemann, F. Lauria, G. Cudkowicz, and J. Franceschini, “Antileukæmic activity of glycyrrhetinic acid,” Nature, vol. 187, no. 4737, pp. 607–608, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. C. Mirsalis, C. M. Hamilton, J. E. Schindler, C. E. Green, and J. E. Dabbs, “Effects of soya bean flakes and liquorice root extract on enzyme induction and toxicity in B6C3F1 mice,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 343–350, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H.-C. Zhang, Y.-X. Song, and Z.-C. Zhang, “Glycyrrhizin administration ameliorates coxsackievirus B3-induced myocarditis in mice,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 344, no. 3, pp. 206–210, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Q. Deng, B. H. May, A. L. Zhang, C. J. Lu, and C. C. L. Xue, “Topical herbal medicine combined with pharmacotherapy for psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 179–189, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Thiugnanam, L. Xu, K. Ramaswamy, and M. Gnanasekar, “Glycyrrhizin induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cell lines DU-145 and LNCaP,” Oncology Reports, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1387–1392, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. F. Chen, P. Xu, S. Y. Zhu, and Y. J. Hu, “Advance in research for pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of licorice,” Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1174–1182, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. P. Yong, “Advances in studies on the synthesis of Glycyrrhizic acid, Glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives and their biological activities,” Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1174–1182, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Matsui, H. Matsumoto, Y. Sonoda et al., “Glycyrrhizin and related compounds down-regulate production of inflammatory chemokines IL-8 and eotaxin 1 in a human lung fibroblast cell line,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 4, no. 13, pp. 1633–1644, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H.-Y. Park, S.-H. Park, H.-K. Yoon, J. H. Myung, and D.-H. Kim, “Anti-allergic activity of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid-3-O-β-D-glucuronide,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 57–60, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Matsumoto, T. Matsuura, H. Aoyagi et al., “Antiviral activity of Glycyrrhizin against Hepatitis C virus in vitro,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. J.-H. Tu, D.-L. Hu, L.-L. Dai et al., “Effect of glycyrrhizin on CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 activity in healthy volunteers with different CYP2C19 genotypes,” Xenobiotica, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 393–399, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Nishimoto, A. Hisatsune, H. Katsuki, T. Miyata, K. Yokomizo, and Y. Isohama, “Glycyrrhizin attenuates mucus production by inhibition of MUC5AC mRNA expression in vivo and in vitro,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 76–83, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Takii, T. Kometani, T. Nishimura, T. Nakae, S. Okada, and T. Fushiki, “Antidiabetic effect of glycyrrhizin in genetically diabetic KK-Ay mice,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 484–487, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C.-X. Zeng, Q.- Yang, and Q.- Hu, “A comparison of the distribution of two glycyrrhizic acid epimers in rat tissues,” European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 253–258, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. P. Manns, H. Wedemeyer, A. Singer et al., “Glycyrrhizin in patients who failed previous interferon alpha-based therapies: biochemical and histological effects after 52 weeks,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 537–546, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. Abe, T. Ebina, and N. Ishida, “Interferon induction by glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetinic acid in mice,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 535–539, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Yasui, K. Fujiwara, A. Tawada, Y. Fukuda, M. Nakano, and O. Yokosuka, “Efficacy of intravenous glycyrrhizin in the early stage of acute onset autoimmune hepatitis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 3638–3647, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Arase, K. Ikeda, N. Murashima et al., “The long term efficacy of Glycyrrhizin in chronic hepatitis C patients,” Cancer, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 1494–1500, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  25. K. Ikeda, “Glycyrrhizin injection therapy prevents hepatocellular carcinogenesis in patients with interferon-resistant active chronic hepatitis C,” Hepatology Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. S287–S293, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  26. H.-F. Wang, H.-B. Su, H.-L. Liu et al., “Clinical research on treatment on several kinds of liver hepatitis with diammonium glycyrrhizinate,” Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 113–115, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  27. Y. Cao, X.-Y. Tang, and F.-W. Song, “Compare of and beta-Glycyrrhetinic acid alpha-Glycyrrhetinic acid in the treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B,” China Journal of Modern Medicine, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 91–92, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  28. Q.-T. Xu, “Clinical observation of magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B,” Journal of Clinical Hepatology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 282–283, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  29. X.-J. Shen, Z.-L. Liu, and Y.-Z. Xue, “Observation of magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate in the treatment of chronic severe hepatitis,” Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 71–72, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  30. H.-C. Ni, Y.-Y. Qi, and W.-D. Feng, “Effect of magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate in the treatment of the hepatotoxicity caused by anti-tumor agents in cancer patients,” Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1099–1100, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  31. T. Genovese, M. Menegazzi, E. Mazzon et al., “Glycyrrhizin reduces secondary inflammatory process after spinal cord compression injury in mice,” Shock, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 367–375, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Lin, Y. Liu, Y. Huang et al., “Glycyrrhizin surface-modified chitosan nanoparticles for hepatocyte-targeted delivery,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 359, no. 1-2, pp. 247–253, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Korenaga, I. Hidaka, S. Nishina et al., “A glycyrrhizin-containing preparation reduces hepatic steatosis induced by hepatitis C virus protein and iron in mice,” Liver International, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 552–560, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G.-Q. Zang, X.-Q. Zhou, H. Yu et al., “Effect of hepatocyte apoptosis induced by TNF-α on acute severe hepatitis in mouse models,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 688–692, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Rivero, J. Crespo, E. Fábrega et al., “Apoptosis mediated by the Fas system in the fulminant hepatitis by hepatitis B virus,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 107–113, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. J. McClain, “Tumor necrosis and alcoholic hepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 394–396, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  37. D. R. Green, “Apoptotic pathways: paper wraps stone blunts scissors,” Cell, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. N. F. El-Tahawy, A. H. Ali, S. R. Saied, and Z. A. Wahab, “Effect of glycyrrhizin on lipopolysaccharide/D-galactosamine-induced acute hepatitis in albino rats: a histological and immunohistochemical study,” The Egyptian Journal of Histology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 518–527, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  39. B. Tang, H. Qiao, F. Meng, and X. Sun, “Glycyrrhizin attenuates endotoxin-induced acute liver injury after partial hepatectomy in rats,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1637–1646, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C.-C. Hu, W.-K. Chen, P.-H. Liao, W.-C. Yu, and Y.-J. Lee, “Synergistic effect of cadmium chloride and acetaldehyde on cytotoxicity and its prevention by quercetin and glycyrrhizin,” Mutation Research: Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, vol. 496, no. 1-2, pp. 117–127, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C.-L. Zhai, M.-Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang et al., “Glycyrrhizin protects rat heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury through blockade of HMGB1-dependent phospho-JNK/Bax pathway,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1477–1487, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  42. B. Ni, Z. Y. Cao, and Y. Liu, “Glycyrrhizin protects spinal cord and reduces inflammation in spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury,” International Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 745–751, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  43. M. Ogiku, H. Kono, M. Hara, M. Tsuchiya, and H. Fujii, “Glycyrrhizin prevents liver injury by inhibition of high-mobility group box 1 production by kupffer cells after ischemia-reperfusion in rats,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 339, no. 1, pp. 93–98, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Rahman and S. Sultana, “Chemopreventive activity of glycyrrhizin on lead acetate mediated hepatic oxidative stress and its hyperproliferative activity in Wistar rats,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C.-T. Tu, J. Li, F.-P. Wang, L. Li, J.-Y. Wang, and W. Jiang, “Glycyrrhizin regulates CD4+T cell response during liver fibrogenesis via JNK, ERK and PI3K/AKT pathway,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 410–421, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  46. H. Honda, Y. Nagai, T. Matsunaga et al., “Glycyrrhizin and isoliquiritigenin suppress the LPS sensor Toll-like receptor 4/MD-2 complex signaling in a different manner,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 967–976, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  47. B. Schröfelbauer, J. Raffetseder, M. Hauner, A. Wolkerstorfer, W. Ernst, and O. H. J. Szolar, “Glycyrrhizin, the main active compound in liquorice, attenuates pro-inflammatory responses by interfering with membrane-dependent receptor signalling,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 421, pp. 473–482, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. Y. Fujisawa, M. Sakamoto, M. Matsushita, T. Fujita, and K. Nishioka, “Glycyrrhizin inhibits the lytic pathway of complement: possible mechanism of its anti-inflammatory effect on liver cells in viral hepatitis,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 799–804, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Takei, M. Kobayashi, D. N. Herndon, R. B. Pollard, and F. Suzuki, “Glycyrrhizin inhibits the manifestations of anti-inflammatory responses that appear in association with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)-like reactions,” Cytokine, vol. 35, no. 5-6, pp. 295–301, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. Menegazzi, R. Di Paola, E. Mazzon et al., “Glycyrrhizin attenuates the development of carrageenan-induced lung injury in mice,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 22–31, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Cinatl, B. Morgenstern, G. Bauer, P. Chandra, H. Rabenau, and H. W. Doerr, “Glycyrrhizin, an active component of liquorice roots, and replication of SARS-associated coronavirus,” The Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9374, pp. 2045–2046, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. U. A. Ashfaq, M. S. Masoud, Z. Nawaz, and S. Riazuddin, “Glycyrrhizin as antiviral agent against Hepatitis C Virus,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, article 112, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. Xu, X. Zhang, and J. Yang, “Effects of glycyrrhizin on biliary transport and hepatic levels of glutathione in rats,” Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 235–245, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  54. J. König, A. T. Nies, Y. Cui, I. Leier, and D. Keppler, “Conjugate export pumps of the multidrug resistance protein (MRP) family: localization, substrate specificity, and MRP2-mediated drug resistance,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Biomembranes, vol. 1461, no. 2, pp. 377–394, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. X.-J. Liang and A. Aszalos, “Multidrug transporters as drug targets,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 911–921, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. Masuda, Y. I'izuka, M. Yamazaki et al., “Methotrexate is excreted into the bile by canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter in rats,” Cancer Research, vol. 57, no. 16, pp. 3506–3510, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. Morikawa, Y. Goto, H. Suzuki, T. Hirohashi, and Y. Sugiyama, “Biliary excretion of 17β-estradiol 17β-D-glucuronide is predominantly mediated by cMOAT/MRP2,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 546–552, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H. Sun, Y.-Y. Zeng, and K.-S. Pang, “Interplay of phase II enzymes and transporters in futile cycling: influence of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2-mediated excretion of estradiol 17β-D-glucuronide and its 3-sulfate metabolite on net sulfation in perfused TR- and wistar rat liver preparations,” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 769–780, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J.-H. Dai, Y. Iwatani, T. Ishida et al., “Glycyrrhizin enhances interleukin-12 production in peritoneal macrophages,” Immunology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 235–243, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. K. Mori, H. Sakai, S. Suzuki et al., “Effects of glycyrrhizin (SNMC: stronger neo-minophagen C) in hemophilia patients with HIV-1 infection,” Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 183–193, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. Miyaji, R. Miyakawa, H. Watanabe, H. Kawamura, and T. Abo, “Mechanisms underlying the activation of cytotoxic function mediated by hepatic lymphocytes following the administration of glycyrrhizin,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1079–1086, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. H. Sato, S. Kageyama, H. Yamamoto et al., “Glycyrrhizin renders cells resistant to apoptosis induced by human and feline immunodeficiency virus,” Journal of Traditional Medicines, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 139–148, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  63. K. Ohuchi, Y. Kamada, L. Levine, and S. Tsurufuji, “Glycyrrhizin inhibits prostaglandin E2 production by activated peritoneal macrophages from rats,” Prostaglandins and Medicine, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 457–463, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. R. Pompei, O. Flore, and M. A. Marccialis, “Glycyrrhizic acid inhibits virus growth and inactivates virus particles,” Nature, vol. 281, no. 5733, pp. 689–690, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. H. Y. Park, S. H. Park, H. K. Yoon, M. J. Han, and D. H. Kim, “Anti-allergic activity of 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid-3-O-beta-D-glucuronide,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 57–60, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  66. S. Tanaka, C. Uno, M. Akimoto, M. Tabata, C. Honda, and W. Kamisako, “Anti-allergic effect of bryonolic acid from Luffa cylindrica cell suspension cultures,” Planta Medica, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 527–530, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. Z. Kawakami, Y. Ikarashi, and Y. Kase, “Glycyrrhizin and its metabolite 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid in glycyrrhiza, a constituent herb of yokukansan, ameliorate thiamine deficiency-induced dysfunction of glutamate transport in cultured rat cortical astrocytes,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 626, no. 2-3, pp. 154–158, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. X. Zhu, C. Chen, D. Ye et al., “Diammonium glycyrrhizinate upregulates PGC-1α and protects against Aβ1-42-induced neurotoxicity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e35823, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J.-Y. Shim, S.-B. Yim, J.-H. Chung, and K.-S. Hong, “Antiplaque and antigingivitis effects of a mouthrinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride, triclosan and dipotassium glycyrrhizinate,” Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 33–38, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  70. H.-X. Gao, S.-H. Shao, and G.-Q. Wang, “Research progress of Radix Glycyrrhizae,” Journal of Jinggangshan Medical College, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 8–11, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  71. X.-L. Li and A.-G. Zhou, “Evaluation of the immunity activity of glycyrrhizin in AR mice,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 716–727, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. V. P. Makarenkova, V. Bansal, B. M. Matta, L. A. Perez, and J. B. Ochoa, “CD11b+/Gr-1+ myeloid suppressor cells cause T cell dysfunction after traumatic stress,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 4, pp. 2085–2094, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. L. Steinstraesser, C. Schubert, F. Jacobsen, and S. Al-Benna, “Glycyrrhizin against multi-resistant bacteria?” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 7–8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. T. Utsunomiya, M. Kobayashi, M. Ito, D. N. Herndon, R. B. Pollard, and F. Suzuki, “Glycyrrhizin restores the impaired IL-12 production in thermally injured mice,” Cytokine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. Y.-H. Zhang, K. Isobe, F. Nagase et al., “Glycyrrhizin as a promoter of the late signal transduction for interleukin-2 production by splenic lymphocytes,” Immunology, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 528–534, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. X.-L. Li, A.-G. Zhou, L. Zhang, and W.-J. Chen, “Antioxidant status and immune activity of glycyrrhizin in allergic rhinitis mice,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 905–916, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. M. Michaelis, J. Geiler, P. Naczk et al., “Glycyrrhizin exerts antioxidative effects in H5N1 influenza A virus-infected cells and inhibits virus replication and pro-inflammatory gene expression,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e19705, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. M. Paolini, J. Barillari, M. Broccoli, L. Pozzetti, P. Perocco, and G. Cantelli-Forti, “Effect of liquorice and glycyrrhizin on rat liver carcinogen metabolizing enzymes,” Cancer Letters, vol. 145, no. 1-2, pp. 35–42, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. H.-T. Chan, C. Chan, and J.-W. Ho, “Inhibition of glycyrrhizic acid on aflatoxin B1-induced cytotoxicity in hepatoma cells,” Toxicology, vol. 188, no. 2-3, pp. 211–217, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. L.-L. Shi, C. Tang, and C.-H. Yin, “Glycyrrhizin-modified O-carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles as drug vehicles targeting hepatocellular carcinoma,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 30, pp. 7594–7604, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  81. G. Shiota, K.-I. Harada, M. Ishida et al., “Inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma by glycyrrhizin in diethylnitrosamine-treated mice,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J.-H. Tu, Y.-J. He, Y. Chen et al., “Effect of glycyrrhizin on the activity of CYP3A enzyme in humans,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 805–810, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  83. B. A. Carneiro-Filho, I. P. F. Lima, D. H. Araujo et al., “Intestinal barrier function and secretion in methotrexate-induced rat intestinal mucositis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S.-P. Lin, S.-Y. Tsai, Y.-C. Hou, and P.-D. L. Chao, “Glycyrrhizin and licorice significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in rats,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1854–1859, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. W. E. Evans, W. R. Crom, and M. Abromowitch, “Clinical pharmacodynamics of high-dose methotrexate in acute lymphocytic leukemia. Identification of a relation between concentration and effect,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 314, no. 8, pp. 471–476, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. M. Tishler, D. Caspi, and M. Yaron, “Long-term experience with low dose methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis,” Rheumatology International, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 103–106, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. J. Chladek, J. Grim, J. Martinkova, M. Simkova, and J. Vaneckova, “Low-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the therapy of severe psoriasis,” Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 247–248, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. A. L. A. Kuijpers and P. C. M. van de Kerkhof, “Risk-benefit assessment of methotrexate in the treatment of severe psoriasis,” The American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–39, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. Y. Maeda, N. Inaba, M. Aoyagi, T. Tanase, and T. Shiigai, “Pseudoaldosteronism caused by combined administration of cilostazol and glycyrrhizin,” Internal Medicine, vol. 47, no. 14, pp. 1345–1348, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. T. Zenone and Q. Blanc, “Rhabdomyolysis with major hypokalemia secondary to chronic glycyrrhizic acid ingestion,” Revue de Medecine Interne, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 78–80, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. R. K. Støving, L. E. Lingqvist, R. K. Bonde et al., “Is glycyrrhizin sensitivity increased in anorexia nervosa and should licorice be avoided? Case report and review of the literature,” Nutrition, vol. 27, no. 7-8, pp. 855–858, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. S. Sen, M. Roy, and A. S. Chakraborti, “Ameliorative effects of glycyrrhizin on streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 287–296, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. D.-G. Kang, E.-J. Sohn, and H.-S. Lee, “Effects of glycyrrhizin on renal functions in association with the regulation of water channels,” The American Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 403–413, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. D.-G. Kang, E.-J. Sohn, Y.-J. Mun, W.-H. Woo, and H.-S. Lee, “Glycyrrhizin ameliorates renal function defects in the early-phase of ischemia-induced acute renal failure,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 947–951, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. Y. Lee, S. Jeong, W. Kim et al., “Glycyrrhizin enhances therapeutic activity of a colon-specific methylprednisolone prodrug against experimental colitis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1226–1234, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  96. T. Rossi, L. Benassi, C. Magnoni, A. I. Ruberto, A. Coppi, and G. Baggio, “Effects of glycyrrhizin on UVB-irradiated melanoma cells,” In Vivo, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 319–322, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. A. B. Hocaoglu, O. Karaman, D. O. Erge et al., “Glycyrrhizin and long-term histopathologic changes in a murine model of asthma,” Current Therapeutic Research: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 250–261, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. A. Ram, U. Mabalirajan, M. Das et al., “Glycyrrhizin alleviates experimental allergic asthma in mice,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1468–1477, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. Y.-F. Ni, J.-K. Kuai, Z.-F. Lu et al., “Glycyrrhizin treatment is associated with attenuation of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. e29–e35, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. M. L. Parisella, T. Angelone, A. Gattuso, M. C. Cerra, and D. Pellegrino, “Glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetinic acid directly modulate rat cardiac performance,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. Y. J. Kim and C. S. Lee, “Glycyrrhizin attenuates MPTP neurotoxicity in mouse and MPP+-induced cell death in PC12 cells,” Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 65–71, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. J. H. Song, J. W. Lee, B. Shim, and C. Y. Lee, “Glycyrrhizin alleviates neuroinflammation and memory deficit Induced by systemic lipopolysaccharide treatment in mice,” Molecules, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 15788–15803, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  103. Z. Song, Y. Gong, H. Liu, Q. Ren, and X. Sun, “Glycyrrhizin could reduce ocular hypertension induced by triamcinolone acetonide in rabbits,” Molecular Vision, vol. 17, pp. 2056–2064, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. T. Utsunomiya, M. Kobayashi, M. Ito, R. B. Pollard, and F. Suzuki, “Glycyrrhizin improves the resistance of MAIDS mice to opportunistic infection of Candida albicans through the modulation of MAIDS-associated type 2 T cell responses,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. T. Yoshida, Y. Tsuda, D. Takeuchi, M. Kobayashi, R. B. Pollard, and F. Suzuki, “Glycyrrhizin inhibits neutrophil-associated generation of alternatively activated macrophages,” Cytokine, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 317–322, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. Y.-M. Mao, M.-D. Zeng, Y. Chen et al., “Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate in the treatment of chronic liver diseases: a randomized, double-blind, multi-doses, active drug controlled, multi-center study,” Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 847–851, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. Z.-W. Xiao, W. Zhang, L. Ma, and Z.-W. Qiu, “Therapeutic effect of magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate in rats on lung injury induced by paraquat poisoning,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 311–320, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  108. J. Zhao, X.-Y. Wan, M. Luo, T.-S. Chen, and P. He, “Antifibrotic effects of glycyrrhizin and matrine in vitro and in vivo,” Biomedicine and Preventive Nutrition, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 132–137, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. X.-Y. Wan, M. Luo, X.-D. Li, and P. He, “Hepatoprotective and anti-hepatocarcinogenic effects of glycyrrhizin and matrine,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. C.-A. Ren, Y.-X. Li, and J.-Y. Cui, “Efficacy of glycyrrhizin combined with cyclosporine in the treatment of non-severe aplastic anemia,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 126, no. 11, pp. 2083–2086, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  111. Y.-Q. Meng, J.-Q. Ding, Y. Liu, H.-H. Nie, S. Guan et al., “Synthesis and anti-tumor activity of novel glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives,” Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 214–219, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  112. Y. Mizushina, T. Ishida, S. Yagi et al., “Inhibitory effects of glycyrrhetinic acid on DNA polymerase and inflammatory activities,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 650514, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. R. Mencucci, E. Favuzza, and U. Menchini, “Assessment of the tolerability profile of an ophthalmic solution of 5% glycyrrhizin and copolymer PEG PPG on healthy volunteers and evaluation of its efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe blepharitis,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 7, pp. 1403–1410, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  114. M. E. Hardy, J. M. Hendricks, J. M. Paulson, and N. R. Faunce, “18 β-glycyrrhetinic acid inhibits rotavirus replication in culture,” Virology Journal, vol. 9, no. 96, pp. 1–7, 2012. View at Google Scholar