BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Familial Parkinson’s Disease/Parkinsonism

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 125273 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/125273

Hyeyoung Park, Han-Joon Kim, Beom S. Jeon, "Parkinsonism in Spinocerebellar Ataxia", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 125273, 11 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/125273

Parkinsonism in Spinocerebellar Ataxia

Academic Editor: Engking Tan
Received15 Jul 2014
Revised29 Sep 2014
Accepted13 Oct 2014
Published19 Mar 2015

Abstract

Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) presents heterogeneous clinical phenotypes, and parkinsonism is reported in diverse SCA subtypes. Both levodopa responsive Parkinson disease (PD) like phenotype and atypical parkinsonism have been described especially in SCA2, SCA3, and SCA17 with geographic differences in prevalence. SCA2 is the most frequently reported subtype of SCA related to parkinsonism worldwide. Parkinsonism in SCA2 has unique genetic characteristics, such as low number of expansions and interrupted structures, which may explain the sporadic cases with low penetrance. Parkinsonism in SCA17 is more remarkable in Asian populations especially in Korea. In addition, an unclear cutoff of the pathologic range is the key issue in SCA17 related parkinsonism. SCA3 is more common in western cohorts. SCA6 and SCA8 have also been reported with a PD-like phenotype. Herein, we reviewed the epidemiologic, clinical, genetic, and pathologic features of parkinsonism in SCAs.

1. Introduction

Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a progressive, autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder which affects the cerebellum and its connected structures. Even though ataxia is a main feature in most cases, clinically there are various phenotypes even in the same SCA subtype which shows numerous clinical features related to the brainstem and spinal cord with or without ataxia [1]. Many extrapyramidal symptoms including parkinsonism are also seen in diverse SCA subtypes.

In the literature, SCA3 or Machado-Joseph disease (MJD) was the first genetically confirmed SCA subtype in a patient with the levodopa-responsive Parkinson disease (PD) like phenotype, although the symptoms of this patient did not exactly resemble idiopathic PD [2]. Since then, many SCA subtypes, such as SCA2 [315], SCA6 [1618], SCA8 [19], and SCA17 [2022], have been described as both levodopa-responsive PD and atypical parkinsonism.

We reviewed the clinical features of parkinsonism in SCAs and discuss the various characteristics from genetic background to pathology. Herein, we focused especially on SCA2 and SCA17 which have been frequently described (Table 1).


StudyCountryParkinsonism typePrevalence, %Number of study populationNumber of affected patientsOnset age, yExpansion number of patientsLevodopa responseCerebellar signsNoticeable clinical featuresLong term follow-up complications

SCA2
Shan et al. (2001) [4]TaiwanFamilial8.6923 patients in 19 families250/5036/37+Both tremor dominant with slow saccade and CIT-PET (+), nystagmus (+) in 1 patient
Kock et al. (2002) [85]MixedFamilial DRP064 young onsets, 32 late onsets (age of onset >50)0
Payami et al. (2003) [6]USAFamilial DRP1.5136236 (Caucasian)/60 (Hispanic)33/35+Evidences of peripheral neuropathy (+) in 1 patient() D+, MF+
Svetel et al. (2003) [86]SerbiaFamilial
YO-DRP
0400
Lu et al. (2004) [10]TaiwanFamilial5.38130 patients in 41 families745.8 ± 13.935–38++a1 patient with mild slow saccades and 1 patient with combined mild dystoniaD+c
Simon-Sanchez et al. (2005) [13]USAFamilial0.88114155 (Caucasian)37+
Lim et al. (2006) [26]SingaporeFamilial IPD0460
Charles et al. (2007) [23]FranceFamilial ADP2178 patients in 164 families329–64 (50.1 ± 13.2)d37–39d+D 22%,
MF 14%d
Lin et al. (2007) [60]TaiwanFamilial0130
Modoni et al. (2007) [24]ItalyFamilial2.57914838+Tremor dominant and CIT-PET (+)D−, MF−
Wang et al. (2009) [27]ChinaFamilial PD1.566242/3536/36+CIT-PET (+)

Kock et al. (2002) [85]MixedSporadic DRP01740
Svetel et al. (2003) [86]SerbiaSporadic
YO-DRP
0450
Shan et al. (2004) [11]TaiwanSporadic PD and atypical parkinsonism0.42421 in PD group and
0 in atypical group
5637+CIT-PET (+)D+, MF+
Lim et al. (2006) [26]SingaporeSporadic
YO-IPD
2.24515036+Postural instability
Tan et al. (2007) [61]SingaporeSporadic atypical parkinsonism patients with poor levodopa response01000
Lin et al. (2007) [60]TaiwanSporadic0600
Modoni et al. (2007) [24]ItalySporadic01450
Kim et al. (2007) [28]KoreaSporadic PD0.43468270/5535/34+Saccadic movement dysfunction, hyporeflexia in 1 patient
Kim et al. (2007) [28]KoreaSporadic MSA-P0.7413515932Minimal+MSA-P type
MRI: cerebellar atrophy
Wang et al. (2009) [27]ChinaSporadic0.5386229/3737/36+
Yun et al. (2011) [29]KoreaSporadic PD03860
Yun et al. (2011) [29]KoreaSporadic MSA0.7213815532+MSA-P type
CIT-PET (+)
MRI: cerebellar atrophy

SCA3
Svetel et al. (2003) [86]SerbiaFamilial
YO-DRP
0400
Simon-Sanchez et al. (2005) [13]USAFamilial01140
Lim et al. (2006) [26]SingaporeFamilial PD0460
Lin et al. (2007) [60]TaiwanFamilial0130
Charles et al. (2007) [23]FranceFamilial ADP0178 patients in 164 families0
Wang et al. (2009) [27]ChinaFamilial366446/25/40/3965/69/73/67++bCIT-PET (+)
Svetel et al. (2003) [86]SerbiaSporadic
YO-DRP
0450
Lim et al. (2006) [26]SingaporeSporadic
YO-IPD
0450
Lin et al. (2007) [60]TaiwanSporadic0600
Tan et al. (2007) [61]SingaporeSporadic atypical parkinsonism patients with poor levodopa response01000
Wang et al. (2009) [27]ChinaSporadic0.8386367/36/3858/64/67+
Yun et al. (2011) [29]KoreaSporadic PD03860
Yun et al. (2011) [29]KoreaSporadic MSA01380

SCA17
Hernandez et al. (2003) [43]USAFamilial0510
Lim et al. (2006) [26]SingaporeFamilial PD0460
Charles et al. (2007) [23]FranceFamilial ADP0178 patients in 164 families0
Kim et al. (2009) [21]KoreaFamilial PD7.4127244/5043/45+D+, MF+
Hernandez et al. (2003) [43]USAFamilial0590

Wu et al. (2004) [19]TaiwanSporadic PD0.3826417546+
Lim et al. (2006) [26]SingaporeSporadic
YO-IPD
0450
Kim et al. (2009) [21]KoreaSporadic PD0.669046Mean 53.75 (44–61) 43/44+
Kim et al. (2009) [21]KoreaSporadic MSA0.89223261/5429–46+
Yun et al. (2011) [29]KoreaSporadic PD0.78386347/66/6245/44/43+
Yun et al. (2011) [29]KoreaSporadic MSA2.89138454/59/74/6246/44/43/43Partial+MSA-P type

Mild dysarthria, ataxic gait, and postural instability in the late stage.
bPositive in 2 patients.
cPositive in 1 patient.
dPrevalence in total 9 including affected family members.
DRP: dopa-responsive parkinsonism, YO: young onset, IPD: idiopathic Parkinson disease, ADP: autosomal dominant parkinsonism, MSA-P: parkinsonian variant of multiple system atrophy, D: dyskinesia, and MF: motor fluctuation.
Each patient is separated with slash mark in onset age and expansion numbers.

2. SCA2

2.1. Epidemiology

SCA2 is the most frequently reported subtype of SCA related to parkinsonism worldwide. The first report of a SCA2 gene mutation with parkinsonism was in a large Chinese family, presenting as familial progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and PD [3]. The authors evaluated 58 family members in four linear generations. There were a total of 11 affected members and 6 of them were alive. Three of the four family members with a clinical PD phenotype showed levodopa responsiveness and one of them had levodopa induced dyskinesia. The fourth member developed mild ataxia later in the course of the disease. Their trinucleotide repeats (TNR) expansion numbers were 35 and 36. One patient with a PSP phenotype had a repeat number of 33. Three patients with ataxia had a younger age at onset with a longer repeat number ().

The prevalence varies depending on ethnicity and family history. In the European population, SCA2 is not a rare cause of familial parkinsonism. Among 164 French families with autosomal dominant parkinsonism (ADP), three families with nine patients had SCA2 mutations (2%) [23]. All of them had levodopa responsiveness without cerebellar signs. The SCA2 patients seemed to be significantly less asymmetrical and less rigid than patients with mutations in other genes. They also required less levodopa and had fewer fluctuations than other genetic causes [23]. In a Brazilian study, the prevalence was 3.4% in familial parkinsonism patients. Intrafamilial, phenotypic homogeneity was a characteristic feature in these Brazilian SCA2 kindred [14]. Modoni et al. [24] detected SCA2 mutations in approximately 1% of Italian familial parkinsonism patients. The patients were tremor-dominant and levodopa-responsive with an abnormal FP-CIT positron emission tomography (PET) scan. In the USA, there were two studies on familial parkinsonism in a mixed population; and SCA2 mutations at a rate of 1.5% [6] and 0.88% [13] were found. In sporadic PD patients, studies failed to find SCA2 mutations in Italy [25] and Serbia [7]. In Asians, the frequencies differ even within the same ethnic group, and the frequency of SCA2 mutations varied from less than 2% [13] to up to 8.7% [4] in familial parkinsonism. The marked difference in prevalence could possibly be explained by the difference in selected cohorts [26]. In contrast to the western studies, sporadic PD patients also showed SCA2 mutations in Asian studies although the prevalence of SCA2 mutations in sporadic form (0.4–2.2%) was lower than that of familial cases [2629]. In Singapore, the SCA2 mutation frequency in a Chinese population was 2.2% in early onset sporadic PD patients, and those cases had an expanded allele of 36 CAG repeats [26]. In Taiwan [11] and in mainland China [27], expanded CAG repeats in the SCA2 locus were found in 0.4% and 0.5% of sporadic PD patients, respectively. In Korea, among a total of 603 parkinsonian patients (468 with PD and 135 with multiple system atrophy-parkinsonian phenotype (MSA-P)), two patients with a PD phenotype and one patient with a MSA-P phenotype were identified to have an expanded SCA2 allele (0.5% with PD phenotype and 0.7% with MSA-P phenotype) [28].

2.2. Clinical Features

Usual manifestations of SCA2 mutations are cerebellar ataxia, dysarthria, tremor, hypoactive deep tendon reflexes, peripheral neuropathy, and slow saccadic eye movements [30]. Clinical features of parkinsonism in SCA2 varied from sporadic PD mimicking [5, 6, 9, 10] to a MSA phenotype [28]. Most parkinsonian cases with SCA2 had normal saccadic movement which was a distinctive feature of SCA2. The onset age of parkinsonism was not different between familial and sporadic cases (29 to 70 years old) in many cohort studies [6, 10, 13, 23, 2629]. Patients with a PD phenotype have shown a good levodopa response; and some of them reported typical dyskinesia and motor fluctuation [6, 11, 12, 14, 23]. Two patients with a MSA phenotype were diagnosed with MSA-P; one of them had parkinsonism and autonomic failure but no cerebellar symptoms including ataxia. The other presented with parkinsonism and autonomic symptoms initially, but ataxia developed after 2 years of follow-up. Both of them showed minimal or no improvement in parkinsonian symptoms from the levodopa treatment [28, 29]. These MSA phenotype patients showed mild cerebellar atrophy on the brain MRI and decreased striatal uptake on dopamine transporter imaging. Other previous DAT-imaging data for SCA2 related parkinsonian patients have shown nigrostriatal dopaminergic damage similar to that of PD with a rostrocaudal gradient [4, 5, 24, 31]. Asymptomatic carriers also have shown a reduction of CIT binding in the putamen [28]. Hence, dopamine transporter imaging may be a useful method to evaluate nigrostriatal dopaminergic damage in the presymptomatic stage in mutation carriers of SCA2.

2.3. Genetic Characterization

In SCA2, 31 or fewer CAG repeats are regarded as normal alleles [32, 33]. In a Korean study [28], 30 patients with ataxia had a CAG expansion of 38 to 51, whereas three patients with parkinsonism were found with 32, 34, and 35 repeats. Of great interest is that all SCA2 parkinsonian patients were sporadic cases, emphasizing the need to screen for SCA2 mutations even in patients with nonfamilial parkinsonism [28]. Previous reports have also shown that SCA2-related parkinsonism carries low to intermediate range expansion compared with the ataxic phenotype [36, 10, 11, 23, 26, 28, 29, 3436]. In the PD phenotype, expansion numbers were similar, regardless of family history [4, 6, 10, 23, 24, 2629]. In the MSA phenotype, expansion numbers were both 32 [28, 29]. In addition to the small expansion number of TNR, there is another interesting feature of parkinsonian SCA2: interrupted CAG repeats. Even though some patients with interrupted CAG repeats presented with predominant ataxia [37], all except one case of structurally investigated SCA2-related parkinsonism cases had interruption by CAA, CGG, and CGC [5, 8, 23, 24, 28]. Only one case failed to show interruption, even though that proband had 33 repeats [6]. These interruptions may promote genetic stability and block the formation of higher repetition. Sobczak and Krzyzosiak proposed a hairpin structure for the CAG repeats [38], and they suggested that pure CAG expansion forms a single hairpin arrangement, and interrupted alleles assemble shorter branched hairpin structures, which can affect mRNA transcription or translation. This may explain the low penetrance in SCA2 related parkinsonian cases and why sporadic cases are common.

2.4. Pathology

In ataxic SCA2, widespread degeneration with neuronal loss and atrophy of the brain and spinal cord was reported including the brainstem, cerebellum, frontal area, motor cerebello-thalamo-cortical loop, and somatosensory system from Clarke’s column to the ventral posterior lateral and ventral posterior medial nuclei of the thalamus [39, 40]. Only two studies have been published on the pathology of parkinsonism with SCA2 [15, 41]. In one report [15], macroscopically, the brainstem, cerebellum, frontal convexity, and spinal cord were atrophic, and the axial sections showed more prominent atrophy at the cerebral peduncle and pontine base. Severe depigmentation was observed in the substantia nigra but not in the locus coeruleus. The other case [41] revealed severe atrophy of the pons, medulla oblongata, and substantia nigra, resembling MSA-cerebellar type. Microscopically, both cases presented widespread antiexpanded polyglutamine antibodies in the neurons including the pontine nucleus, cerebellum, the inferior olivary nucleus, substantia nigra, and frontal cortex. Interestingly enough, there was coexistent Lewy body pathology in the substantia nigra, locus ceruleus, and dorsal motor nuclei of the vagus in both cases [15, 41]. In addition, there were Lewy bodies and neuritis in the sympathetic nerve in the myocardium of one case [41] and in the basal nucleus of the Meynert, hypothalamus, and amygdala in another case [15].

3. SCA17

3.1. Epidemiology

SCA17 was initially reported by a Japanese group [42] in four Japanese pedigrees with a combination of dementia, ataxia, hyperreflexia, parkinsonism, and other involuntary movements such as dystonia and chorea. Epilepsy was also observed. Abnormal CAG expansion in the TATA-binding protein (TBP) gene with 47 to 55 repeats was found in these families, whereas the normal repeat number ranged from 29 to 42. A case of a 49-year-old man with progressive ataxia, autonomic dysfunction, parkinsonism, supranuclear palsy, and cognitive impairment was reported by a Taiwanese group in 2007 [20]. This case was not a pure parkinsonian phenotype, but it was particularly significant because an 18F-6-fluorodopa PET study showed a marked decrease of fluorodopa uptake in the bilateral putaminal regions and left caudate nucleus [20].

Wu et al. analyzed 334 patients (39 patients with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia, 31 patients with sporadic ataxia, and 264 patients with PD); and one patient with dopamine-responsive PD was discovered with a SCA17 expansion with a repeat number of 46 (0.4%) [19]. SCA17 was extensively studied by our group. In a large Korean sporadic parkinsonian population of 1155 patients (931 with PD and 224 with MSA), 0.9% (eight patients with PD and two patients with MSA) were found with SCA17 [21]. In the familial form of parkinsonism, over 7% (two patients out of 27) of the patients showed positive results [21]. Another Korean cohort of sporadic parkinsonism patients (386 with PD and 138 with MSA) had similar results: 0.78% with PD and 2.89% with MSA-P [29].

However, a Singapore cohort failed to discover SCA17-related parkinsonism [26] in 46 familial PD patients and 45 sporadic PD patients. There were no SCA17-related parkinsonian phenotypes in western cohorts neither in the familial nor in the sporadic cases [23, 43].

3.2. Clinical Features

Previous reports have presented the heterogeneous clinical features of SCA17 which included cerebellar ataxia with dementia, epilepsy, psychosis, and abnormal movement disorders including chorea, dystonia, and parkinsonism [20, 42, 44]. SCA17 related parkinsonism dominant type revealed similar features with PD. The onset age of PD-mimicking type was from 44 to 75 [19, 21, 29] which is not different from that of PD patients. The PD phenotype is levodopa-responsive and can show motor fluctuation and dyskinesia. We experienced a case with a good levodopa-responsive PD patient with severe motor fluctuation and peak dose dyskinesia who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery. After DBS, his motor fluctuation and dyskinesia disappeared. Two years later, postural instability developed and mild cerebellar atrophy on the brain MRI was observed [21].

The onset age of MSA-mimicking type was from 54 to 74, and all these MSA patients had the MSA-P phenotype with no levodopa response. Two of them showed no ataxia [21] whereas the other four developed mild ataxia with follow-up [29]. One out of six patients showed putaminal atrophy and two patients showed cerebellar atrophy on the brain MRI [21, 29].

Combinations of other neurological problems with parkinsonism have also been reported. Chorea is a common feature of SCA17, and Huntington’s disease-like phenotype has been seen in some of the literature at 0.4 to 0.8% [4547]. Recently, one study reported reduced dopamine D2 receptor levels in the putamen and caudate of symptomatic SCA17 patients, and many presymptomatic SCA17 patients had already shown reduced D2 levels [22]. Moreover, the D2 levels in the putamen correlated with motor disability level, as assessed by the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III.

3.3. Genetic Characterization

SCA17 has a vague boundary for the expansion number for the pathologic range. Previous studies suggested the repeat number 43 as a cut-off value [42, 48]. Kim et al. [21] showed the possibility that an expansion as low as 42 repeats could constitute a risk factor or a susceptibility gene for parkinsonism by showing decreased striatal DAT binding in the normal control with 42 repeats. Ataxia patients with only 41 repeats of the TBP gene have also been reported [4951]. However, there were normal controls with more than 43 repeats. It is still unclear whether 41 repeats could be a risk factor for neurological problems or just an incidental finding. There may exist a modifier that expresses a borderline repeat expansion. Additionally, many patients with SCA17 in structurally investigated studies had CAA interruptions [19, 21, 52, 53], which have been shown in SCA2 related parkinsonism, especially in all the patients with the parkinsonian phenotype [19, 21].

3.4. Pathology

Pathologic studies are limited for SCA17. In ataxic SCA17 cases, there was marked atrophy of the cerebellum with the loss of Purkinje cells and mild atrophy in the basal ganglia and cortex [44]. In one patient, substantia nigra atrophy was also observed. Microscopically, intranuclear neuronal inclusion bodies with anti-TBP and 1C2 were widely distributed [44]. Other pathology reports also found similar results including pseudohypertrophic degeneration of the inferior olive, marked neuronal loss, and gliosis in the caudate nucleus and substantia nigra and in the medial thalamic nuclei in 16 affected ataxic patients [54, 55].

However, the pathology for parkinsonian SCA17 has not been studied, and further study is needed in the future.

4. SCA3

4.1. Epidemiology

SCA3 is the most common SCA worldwide with geographic differences [56] and has been regarded as one of the genetic causes of familial parkinsonism, especially in African ethnicities [57, 58]. A study that described the ethnic differences in the expression between Africans and Caucasians concluded that SCA3 expansion should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all African cases of parkinsonism [58]. There were some familial parkinsonism cases [14, 57] and case series [2, 59] on parkinsonism in SCA3, but only a few cohort studies with large populations [7, 13, 23, 26, 60, 61] were done with only two positive result studies [14, 27]. In a Brazilian population, 7.4% of familial parkinsonism with combined ataxic patients gave a positive result [14]. Wang et al. reported 3% of familial PD and 0.8% of sporadic PD in a mainland Chinese population without ataxic symptoms [27]. A group of 524 Korean patients with parkinsonism (386 with PD and 138 with MSA) was examined for SCA3, but none were found to have SCA3 [29].

4.2. Clinical Features

The clinical phenotypes of SCA3 were classically classified into three categories: type 1 with early onset pyramidal and extrapyramidal signs, type 2 with cerebellar and pyramidal symptoms, and type 3 with cerebellar involvement and anterior horn cell degeneration [62]. Parkinsonism with a combination of other neurological symptoms was regarded as the fourth type of SCA3 [2]. A PD-resembling phenotype has been reported in an African-American family with autosomal dominant parkinsonism due to a SCA3 mutation [57]. The CAG repeats of the four patients in the family were 73, 67, 68, and 75. Although they showed cardinal parkinsonian symptoms and levodopa responsiveness, three of them had saccade slowing and one of them had combined peripheral neuropathy. None of them showed ataxia. The PD phenotype in SCA3 with 66 repeats was indistinguishable from PD, including levodopa response and typically expected motor complications in its advanced stages [63].

4.3. Genetic Characterization

SCA3 is caused by a CAG expansion in the ATXN3 gene for the protein ataxin-3 [64] with a pathologic expansion number from 52 to 86 [65]. A normal allele has fewer than 44 CAG repeats [66]. Several studies on the genotype and phenotype correlation of SCA3 have been done, but there are no findings on parkinsonism in SCA3. Only the length of the expanded CAG and age at onset showed a strong inverse relationship to each other [62, 67].

4.4. Pathology

Many pathology reports have been published about ataxic patients with SCA3 mutations. Macroscopic brain examinations showed the pallor of the substantia nigra as well as the degeneration of the cerebellum and brainstem [68]. Neuronal loss was observed in the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, midbrain, pons, medulla oblongata, cerebellum, and even spinal cord [55, 69, 70]. Chen et al. [71] reported that the degeneration of the subthalamopallidal system was the main neuropathologic features of SCA3. The MSA-C phenotype, which was confirmed by numerous alpha-synuclein-containing glial cytoplasmic inclusions in autopsies, was also reported with 72 repeats for the SCA3 mutation [72]. No autopsy reports for SCA3 patients with the PD phenotype have been reported until now.

5. SCA6

SCA6 is from a CAG expansion in the CACNA1A gene [16] generally manifests in the form of pure ataxia [1]. However, there have been some cases with mixed manifestations in SCA6. Kohira et al. presented a case of parkinsonism with ataxia that featured a slow, symmetrical progression and a lack of response to levodopa [73]. Autonomic dysfunction is sometimes observed in SCA6. Lee et al. reported two cases of parkinsonism with urinary incontinence in non-juvenile-onset parkinsonism with the SCA6 mutation, which were misdiagnosed as MSA [74]. Korean data showed that the striatal DAT density is variably reduced in SCA6 [18]. Yun et al. reported on a patient with young onset parkinsonism without cerebellar dysfunction who showed no improvement with levodopa at 800 mg/day [75]. His expansion number for SCA6 was increased to 20 (less than 16 in a normal population) [76]. Gastric cancer was found during the follow-up, and immunohistochemistry in the resection margin from his stomach showed no alpha-synuclein-positive inclusions.

6. SCA8

The SCA8 mutation involves two overlapping genes ATXN8OS and ATXN8 [67] with normal alleles of 15 to 50 CTG repeats; it is mainly characterized by cerebellar involvement with hyperactive tendon reflexes [77]. Wu et al. detected an abnormal expansion of SCA8 in four patients with typical PD (1.5%) from among 264 patients with PD [19]. The range of the SCA8 repeat size was analyzed in a Taiwanese PD cohort, and large SCA8 alleles (66–120 repeats) and a novel ATXN8 −62 G/A promoter SNP were found [78]. The same group also performed a structural analysis in a cohort of 569 PD cases and 547 ethnically matched controls, and they found that individuals carrying the AA genotype exhibited a decreased risk of developing PD than those with the GG + GA phenotypes [71]. A Japanese group analyzed the SCA8 CTA/CTG repeat for 2806 people including 448 PD patients, and 0.4% had expanded alleles (85–399) while there were no individuals with expansion among the 654 normal controls [79]. A patient with levodopa-responsive parkinsonism with additional movement disorders such as a dystonic gait and an unusual oscillatory movement of the trunk was reported as having a mutation in SCA8 in Korea [80].

7. Conclusion

SCA can present as parkinsonism, especially in SCA2, SCA3, and SCA17. SCA3 is more common in western populations, and SCA2 and SCA17 are more prevalent in Asian populations. SCA6 and SCA8 may also present parkinsonism in some cases. The important thing is that SCA2 and SCA17 may very closely mimic PD and be a not uncommon genetic cause of parkinsonism in Asian regions even in sporadic cases. Thus, the screening of SCA2, SCA3, and SCA17 may be required in PD patients. Small expansion with interruption could explain the parkinsonian phenotype and sporadic cases with low penetrance. A direct interaction between alpha-synuclein accumulation and a shorter expansion of CAG repeats are under investigation. The association between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and ATXN2 has been known as an increased risk [8183], and the coexistence of SCA2 and ALS was also reported [84]. This implies that SCA can involve not only the cerebellar system but also other nervous systems and cause diverse neurodegenerative diseases.

In conclusion, even when a patient shows parkinsonism alone, we need to consider that SCA could be the differential diagnosis. There is a need for careful pathological examination to explain why SCA can present as parkinsonism. Furthermore, why there are geographical or ethnic differences in SCA related parkinsonism which needs to be investigated.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Seoul National University Hospital Grant (042012-1100).

References

  1. M.-U. Manto, “The wide spectrum of spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs),” Cerebellum, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2–6, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. J. Tuite, E. A. Rogaeva, P. H. St George-Hyslop, and A. E. Lang, “Dopa-responsive parkinsonism phenotype of Machado-Joseph disease: confirmation of 14q CAG expansion,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 684–687, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. Gwinn-Hardy, J. Y. Chen, H.-C. Liu et al., “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 with parkinsonism in ethnic Chinese,” Neurology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 800–805, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D.-E. Shan, B.-W. Soong, C.-M. Sun, S.-J. Lee, K.-K. Liao, and R.-S. Liu, “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 presenting as familial levodopa-responsive parkinsonism,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 812–815, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Furtado, M. Farrer, Y. Tsuboi et al., “SCA-2 presenting as parkinsonism in an Alberta family: clinical, genetic, and PET findings,” Neurology, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 1625–1627, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Payami, J. Nutt, S. Gancher et al., “SCA2 may present as levodopa-responsive parkinsonism,” Movement Disorders, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 425–429, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Svetel, A. Djarmati, N. Dragašević et al., “SCA2 and SCA3 mutations in young-onset dopa-responsive parkinsonism,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 597, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Furtado, H. Payami, P. J. Lockhart et al., “Profile of families with parkinsonism-predominant spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2),” Movement Disorders, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 622–629, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Infante, J. Berciano, V. Volpini et al., “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 with levodopa-responsive parkinsonism culminating in motor neuron disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 848–852, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. S. Lu, Y. H. Wu Chou, P. C. Kuo, H. C. Chang, and Y. H. Weng, “The parkinsonian phenotype of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 35–38, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D.-E. Shan, R.-S. Liu, C.-M. Sun, S.-J. Lee, K.-K. Liao, and B.-W. Soong, “Presence of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 gene mutation in a patient with apparently sporadic Parkinson's disease: clinical implications,” Movement Disorders, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1357–1360, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Wilkins, J. M. Brown, and R. A. Barker, “SCA2 presenting as levodopa-responsive Parkinsonism in a young patient from the United Kingdom: a case report,” Movement Disorders, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 593–595, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Simon-Sanchez, M. Hanson, A. Singleton et al., “Analysis of SCA-2 and SCA-3 repeats in Parkinsonism: evidence of SCA-2 expansion in a family with autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 382, no. 1-2, pp. 191–194, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. P. Socal, V. E. Emmel, C. R. M. Rieder, A. Hilbig, M. L. Saraiva-Pereira, and L. B. Jardim, “Intrafamilial variability of Parkinson phenotype in SCAs: novel cases due to SCA2 and SCA3 expansions,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 374–378, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Takao, M. Aoyama, K. Ishikawa et al., “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 is associated with Parkinsonism and Lewy body pathology,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2011, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  16. N. L. Khan, P. Giunti, M. G. Sweeney et al., “Parkinsonism and nigrostriatal dysfunction are associated with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6),” Movement Disorders, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1115–1119, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. U. Wüllner, M. Reimold, M. Abele et al., “Dopamine transporter positron emission tomography in spinocerebellar ataxias type 1, 2, 3, and 6,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1280–1285, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J.-M. Kim, J.-Y. Lee, H. J. Kim et al., “The wide clinical spectrum and nigrostriatal dopaminergic damage in spinocerebellar ataxia type 6,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 529–532, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. R. Wu, H. Y. Lin, C.-M. Chen et al., “Genetic testing in spinocerebellar ataxia in Taiwan: expansions of trinucleotide repeats in SCA8 and SCA17 are associated with typical Parkinson's disease,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 209–214, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. I.-S. Lin, R.-M. Wu, G.-J. Lee-Chen, D.-E. Shan, and K. Gwinn-Hardy, “The SCA17 phenotype can include features of MSA-C, PSP and cognitive impairment,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 246–249, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Y. Kim, S. Y. Kim, J. M. Kim et al., “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 17 mutation as a causative and susceptibility gene in parkinsonism,” Neurology, vol. 72, no. 16, pp. 1385–1389, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Brockmann, M. Reimold, C. Globas et al., “PET and MRI reveal early evidence of neurodegeneration in spinocerebellar ataxia type 17,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1074–1080, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. Charles, A. Camuzat, N. Benammar et al., “Are interrupted SCA2 CAG repeat expansions responsible for parkinsonism?” Neurology, vol. 69, no. 21, pp. 1970–1975, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Modoni, M. F. Contarino, A. R. Bentivoglio et al., “Prevalence of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 mutation among Italian Parkinsonian patients,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 324–327, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Hamada, T. Fukazawa, T. Yanagihara et al., “Neuropathological study of autosomal dominant ataxia linked to loci on chromosome 6p (SCA 1),” Brain and Nerve, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1045–1049, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. W. Lim, Y. Zhao, E. Chua et al., “Genetic analysis of SCA2, 3 and 17 in idiopathic Parkinson's disease,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 403, no. 1-2, pp. 11–14, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. L. Wang, B. Xiao, X. X. Cui et al., “Analysis of SCA2 and SCA3/MJD repeats in Parkinson's disease in mainland China: genetic, clinical, and positron emission tomography findings,” Movement Disorders, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 2007–2011, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J.-M. Kim, S. Hong, P. K. Gyoung et al., “Importance of low-range CAG expansion and CAA interruption in SCA2 parkinsonism,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1510–1518, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Y. Yun, W.-W. Lee, H. J. Kim et al., “Relative contribution of SCA2, SCA3 and SCA17 in Korean patients with parkinsonism and ataxia,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 338–342, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. A. G. Teive, “Spinocerebellar ataxias,” Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1133–1142, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. S. Lu, Y. H. Wu Chou, T. C. Yen, C. H. Tsai, R. S. Chen, and H. C. Chang, “Dopa-responsive parkinsonism phenotype of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2,” Movement Disorders, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1046–1051, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Y. Kim, S. S. Park, S.-I. Joo, J.-M. Kim, and B. S. Jeon, “Molecular analysis of spinocerebellar ataxias in Koreans: frequencies and reference ranges of SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, and SCA7,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 336–341, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  33. J.-M. Kim, S. Shin, J. Y. Kim et al., “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 in seven Korean families: CAG trinucleotide expansion and clinical characteristics,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 659–664, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. Krishna, S. Mohan, B. S. Yashavantha et al., “SCA 1, SCA 2 & SCA 3/MJD mutations in ataxia syndromes in southern India,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 465–470, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  35. G. Cancel, A. Dürr, O. Didierjean et al., “Molecular and clinical correlations in spinocerebellar ataxia 2: a study of 32 families,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 709–715, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  36. O. Riess, F. A. Laccone, S. Gispert et al., “SCA2 trinucleotide expansion in German SCA patients,” Neurogenetics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Costanzi-Porrini, D. Tessarolo, C. Abbruzzese, M. Liguori, T. Ashizawa, and M. Giacanelli, “An interrupted 34-CAG repeat SCA-2 allele in patients with sporadic spinocerebellar ataxia,” Neurology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 491–493, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. K. Sobczak and W. J. Krzyzosiak, “CAG repeats containing CAA interruptions form branched hairpin structures in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 transcripts,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 5, pp. 3898–3910, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. U. Rüb, C. Schultz, K. Del Tredici et al., “Anatomically based guidelines for systematic investigation of the central somatosensory system and their application to a spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) patient,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 418–433, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. Ishida, K. Komai, K. Yonezawa et al., “An autopsy case of an aged patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2,” Neuropathology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 510–518, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. S. Yomono, H. Kurisaki, A. Hebisawa, Y. Sakiyama, Y. Saito, and S. Murayama, “An autopsy case of SCA2 with parkinsonian phenotype,” Clinical Neurology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 156–162, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  42. K. Nakamura, S.-Y. Jeong, T. Uchihara et al., “SCA17, a novel autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia caused by an expanded polyglutamine in TATA-binding protein,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 1441–1448, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. D. Hernandez, M. Hanson, A. Singleton et al., “Mutation at the SCA17 locus is not a common cause of parkinsonism,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 317–320, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. Rolfs, A. H. Koeppen, I. Bauer et al., “Clinical features and neuropathology of autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA17),” Annals of Neurology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 367–375, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. Stevanin, H. Fujigasaki, A.-S. Lebre et al., “Huntington's disease-like phenotype due to trinucleotide repeat expansions in the TBP and JPH3 genes,” Brain, vol. 126, no. 7, pp. 1599–1603, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Sułek-Piatkowska, W. Krysa, E. Zdzienicka et al., “Searching for mutation in the JPH3, ATN1 and TBP genes in Polish patients suspected of Huntington's disease and without mutation in the IT15 gene,” Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 203–209, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  47. P. Bauer, F. Laccone, A. Rolfs et al., “Trinucleotide repeat expansion in SCA17/TBP in white patients with Huntington's disease-like phenotype,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 230–232, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. I. Silveira, C. Miranda, L. Guimaraes et al., “Trinucleotide repeats in 202 families with ataxia: a small expanded (CAG) n allele at the SCA17 locus,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 623–629, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. Nanda, S. A. Jackson, J. D. Schwankhaus, and W. S. Metzer, “Case of spinocerebellar ataxia type 17 (SCA17) associated with only 41 repeats of the TATA-Binding Protein (TBP) gene,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 3, article 436, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. T. T. Nielsen, S. Mardosiene, A. Løkkegaard et al., “Severe and rapidly progressing cognitive phenotype in a SCA17-family with only marginally expanded CAG/CAA repeats in the TATA-box binding protein gene: a case report,” BMC Neurology, vol. 12, article 73, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. M. Doherty, T. T. Warner, and A. J. Lees, “Late onset ataxia: MSA-C or SCA 17? A gene penetrance dilemma,” Movement Disorders, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 36–38, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. Oda, H. Maruyama, O. Komure et al., “Possible reduced penetrance of expansion of 44 to 47 CAG/CAA repeats in the TATA-binding protein gene in spinocerebellar ataxia type 17,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 209–212, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. F. Maltecca, A. Filla, I. Castaldo et al., “Intergenerational instability and marked anticipation in SCA-17,” Neurology, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 1441–1443, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. C. Bruni, J. Takahashi-Fujigasaki, F. Maltecca et al., “Behavioral disorder, dementia, ataxia, and rigidity in a large family with TATA box-binding protein mutation,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1314–1320, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. K. Seidel, S. Siswanto, E. R. P. Brunt, W. den Dunnen, H.-W. Korf, and U. Rüb, “Brain pathology of spinocerebellar ataxias,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. L. Schöls, P. Bauer, T. Schmidt, T. Schulte, and O. Riess, “Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: clinical features, genetics, and pathogenesis,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 291–304, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. K. Gwinn-Hardy, A. Singleton, P. O'Suilleabhain et al., “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 phenotypically resembling Parkinson disease in a black family,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 296–299, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. H. Subramony, D. Hernandez, A. Adam et al., “Ethnic differences in the expression of neurodegenerative disease: Machado-Joseph disease in Africans and Caucasians,” Movement Disorders, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1068–1071, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Siebert, K. C. Donis, M. Socal et al., “Glucocerebrosidase gene variants in parkinsonian patients with Machado Joseph/spinocerebellar ataxia 3,” Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. C.-H. Lin, W.-L. Hwu, S.-C. Chiang, C.-H. Tai, and R.-M. Wu, “Lack of mutations in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 and 3 genes in a Taiwanese (Ethnic Chinese) cohort of familial and early-onset parkinsonism,” American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 434–438, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. E. K. Tan, J. Tong, R. Pavanni, M. C. Wong, and Y. Zhao, “Genetic analysis of SCA 2 and 3 repeat expansions in essential tremor and atypical Parkinsonism,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 1971–1974, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. F. C. A. Romanul, H. L. Fowler, J. R. Radvany, R. G. Feldman, and M. Feingold, “Azorean disease of the nervous system,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 296, no. 26, pp. 1505–1508, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. C. Buhmann, A. Bussopulos, and M. Oechsner, “Dopaminergic response in parkinsonian phenotype of Machado-Joseph Disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 219–221, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Y. Kawaguchi, T. Okamoto, M. Taniwaki et al., “CAG expansions in a novel gene for Machado-Joseph disease at chromosome 14q32.1,” Nature Genetics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 221–228, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. H. L. Paulson, “The spinocerebellar ataxias,” Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 227–237, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. Q. S. Padiath, A. K. Srivastava, S. Roy, S. Jain, and S. K. Brahmachari, “Identification of a novel 45 repeat unstable allele associated with a disease phenotype at the MJD1/SCA3 locus,” The American Journal of Medical Genetics—Neuropsychiatric Genetics, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 124–126, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. L. Moseley, T. Zu, Y. Ikeda et al., “Bidirectional expression of CUG and CAG expansion transcripts and intranuclear polyglutamine inclusions in spinocerebellar ataxia type 8,” Nature Genetics, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 758–769, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. K. Bürk, M. Abele, M. Fetter et al., “Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I clinical features and MRI in families with SCA1, SCA2 and SCA3,” Brain, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 1497–1505, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. U. Rüb, D. del Turco, K. del Tredici et al., “Thalamic involvement in a spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) and a spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) patient, and its clinical relevance,” Brain, vol. 126, part 10, pp. 2257–2272, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. U. Rüb, R. A. I. de Vos, E. R. Brunt et al., “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3): thalamic neurodegeneration occurs independently from thalamic ataxin-3 immunopositive neuronal intranuclear inclusions,” Brain Pathology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 218–227, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. I. C. Chen, Y. R. Wu, S. J. Yang et al., “ATXN8 -62 G/A promoter polymorphism and risk of Taiwanese Parkinson's disease,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1462–1469, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. M. J. Nirenberg, J. Libien, J.-P. Vonsattel, and S. Fahn, “Multiple system atrophy in a patient with the spinocerebellar ataxia 3 gene mutation,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 251–254, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. I. Kohira, H. Ujike, T. Katsu, Y. Ninomiya, and K. Ohashi, “A case of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 with hypochondriasis and severe parkinsonism,” Nō to Shinkei, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1119–1122, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  74. W. Y. Lee, D. K. Jin, M. R. Oh et al., “Frequency analysis and clinical characterization of spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 in Korean patients,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 858–863, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  75. J. Y. Yun, J.-M. Kim, H.-J. Kim, Y. E. Kim, and B. S. Jeon, “SCA6 presenting with young-onset parkinsonism without ataxia,” Movement Disorders, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1067–1068, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. H. Takahashi, T. Ikeuchi, Y. Honma, S. Hayashi, and S. Tsuji, “Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA6): clinical, genetic and neuropathological study in a family,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 333–337, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. J. W. Day, L. J. Schut, M. L. Moseley, A. C. Durand, and L. P. W. Ranum, “Spinocerebellar ataxia type 8: clinical features in a large family,” Neurology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 649–657, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Y.-R. Wu, I.-C. Chen, B.-W. Soong et al., “SCA8 repeat expansion: large CTA/CTG repeat alleles in neurological disorders and functional implications,” Human Genetics, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 437–444, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. Y. Izumi, H. Maruyama, M. Oda et al., “SCA8 repeat expansion: large CTA/CTG repeat alleles are more common in ataxic patients, including those with SCA6,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 704–709, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. J. S. Kim, T. O. Son, J. Youn, C.-S. Ki, and J. W. Choa, “Non-ataxic phenotypes of SCA8 mimicking amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and parkinson disease,” Journal of Clinical Neurology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 274–279, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. C. Elden, H. J. Kim, M. P. Hart et al., “Ataxin-2 intermediate-length polyglutamine expansions are associated with increased risk for ALS,” Nature, vol. 466, no. 7310, pp. 1069–1075, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. P. van Damme, J. H. Veldink, M. van Blitterswijk et al., “Expanded ATXN2 CAG repeat size in ALS identifies genetic overlap between ALS and SCA2,” Neurology, vol. 76, no. 24, pp. 2066–2072, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. H. Daoud, V. Belzil, S. Martins et al., “Association of long ATXN2 CAG repeat sizes with increased risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 739–742, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S. Tazen, K. Figueroa, J. Y. Kwan et al., “Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 in a family with full CAG repeat expansions of ATXN2,” JAMA Neurology, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1302–1304, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. N. Kock, B. Müller, P. Vieregge et al., “Role of SCA2 mutations in early- and late-onset dopa-responsive Parkinsonism,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 257–258, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. M. Svetel, A. Djarmati, N. Dragašević et al., “SCA2 and SCA3 mutations in young-onset dopa-responsive parkinsonism,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 597, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Hyeyoung Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views8482
Downloads1496
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.