BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Cardiovascular Function in Intensive Care Medicine or Homo Mensura Est

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 187384 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/187384

Beyond the Limits: Clinical Utility of Novel Cardiac Biomarkers

Academic Editor: Mitja Lainscak
Received14 Jun 2015
Revised03 Aug 2015
Accepted17 Aug 2015
Published04 Oct 2015

Abstract

Preoperative assessment of cardiovascular risk is essential when it comes to extensive noncardiac surgery procedures. Therefore, accurate and timely diagnosis of myocyte damage is vital. In modern medical practice it is believed that the so-called “multimarker” approach is the most appropriate and most accurate, but new research points out that there are novel biomarkers which could be used independently. Studies that evaluate miRNA, H-FABP, and MR-PAMP give encouraging results. When it comes to miRNA clinical studies show high statistical significance, especially in the case of acute myocardial infarction (). Statistical significance of was found in acute coronary syndrome, when H-FABP was measured. Biochemical marker MR-PAMP showed statistical significance of in most clinical studies.

1. Introduction

Anesthesiologists are daily in contact with patients who are preparing for noncardiac surgery procedures and who are at increased risk to develop cardiovascular complications in perioperative period. The number of these patients is increasing worldwide [1, 2]. Perioperative risk can be estimated based on the severity of existing heart failure, development of recent myocardial infarction, existence of arrhythmias, presence of aortic stenosis, patient’s age, type of planned surgery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal function, previous transient ischemic attack, the general condition of the patient, and so forth [36]. Postoperative hypertension, arrhythmia, and heart failure usually occur two days after surgery, while the risk of perioperative myocardial infarction persists during five to six postoperative days [3]. In total, less than 1% of patients develop perioperative myocardial infarction; however about two-thirds of these patients die within 30 postoperative days. Therefore, timely preoperative diagnosis of myocyte damage is vital [1]. Until recently Lee score was used to assess perioperative risk; however European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) have proposed a new and comprehensive way to evaluate perioperative cardiac risk [7, 8]. Significant item of this preoperative evaluation and processing of high-risk patients are biomarkers. We have evaluated potential use of miRNA, H-FABP, and MR-PAMP in everyday clinical practice as well as the characteristics which make them stand out as highly promising novel biomarkers.

2. Biomarkers in Clinical Practice

Biological marker or biomarker can be objectively measured and it is an indicator of biological processes [8]. From the definition, ideal biomarker has the following characteristics: a high presence in the heart tissue, an absence in other tissues, an absence in the serum of healthy individuals, quick release for the purpose of early diagnosis, a long half-life for the purpose of late diagnosis, cost-effectiveness, and positive evaluation in clinical trials [911]. The search for an ideal cardiac biomarker lasts for almost a century (Table 1).


BiomarkerYear of first appearance in literatureOne of the first significant references when it comes to myocardial injury

H-FABP1988 [68]
AST1954[69]
LDH1948[70]
CK1954[71]
HBDH1963[72]
CK-MB1962[73]
CK-MB mass1986[74]
Myoglobin1941[75]
TnT1940[76]
TnI1987[77]
miRNA2009[37]
PAMP2002[78]

In modern medicine practice there are numerous biomarkers, those that point to an obvious pathology of cardiomyocytes and those that provide a strong evidence of comorbidity such as acute renal failure and pneumonia [12]. The following biomarkers are currently used: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK), hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (HBDH), creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB), CK-MB mass, myoglobin, carbonic anhydrase, glycogen phosphorylase BB, troponin T (TnT), and troponin I (TnI) [9, 13]. According to the latest recommendations, biomarkers which determine myocardial ischaemia and damage, inflammation, and left ventricular function are used in the perioperative period. The most popular biomarkers in modern practice are cTnI and cTnT due to higher sensitivity and specificity when compared to other biomarkers. Clinical studies have shown that even a small increase in the concentration of cTnT in the perioperative period indicates myocardial damage and worsens postoperative prognosis and outcome. Preoperative determination of BNP and NT-pro-BNP levels indicates the possibility of developing cardiovascular complications after major noncardiovascular surgeries [8, 1316]. Biomarkers also have a great role in improving the treatment of heart diseases and monitoring of the effectiveness of the therapy [12]. There is the fact that there are no biomarkers which can be interpreted and included in routine work alone but can only indicate the high-risk patients [8].

It is believed that a multimarker approach is the most appropriate and most accurate and that a new set of biomarkers (currently in the trial phase) is much more accurate and that they could even be used independently [12]. The development and definition of new biomarkers will lead to a faster and more accurate diagnosis of myocardial damage [8, 17]. A large number of studies about new potential biomarkers of myocardial damage such as microRNA (mrRNA), fatty acid-binding protein (FABP), and proadrenomedullin (PAMP) are currently conducted (Figure 1).

3. The Significance of miRNA as a Biomarker

MicroRNA (miRNA) represents a recently discovered class of endogenous, small, noncoding RNA molecules which regulate the expression of approximately 30% of genes in the human genome and are highly stable in the circulation [2, 1822]. Basic and clinical studies indicate a great importance of miRNA in the regulation of cellular differentiation, growth, proliferation, and apoptosis [2325]. Besides miRNA, which are specific for the majority of tissues, there are also miRNAs with a tissue-specific expression and they could be useful in practice [19, 26, 27].

These molecules can be transported between the cells in the form of miRNA bound to RISC, Argonaute 2, and Nucleophosmin 1 proteins as well as in the form of miRNA packed in vesicles. It is considered that a free miRNA molecule can be found in blood as a consequence of the release of the cell contents in plasma due to necrosis [26].

The role of miRNA was first studied in the field of oncology, where they were considered to be both oncogenes and tumor suppressors [2, 28]. Earlier studies indicated a great expression of miRNA in the heart cells; however their role has not been completely known until the beginning of the research in 2005 [2, 19]. Research based on miR-155 has indicated that it has a key role in the development of immune disorders, tumors, cardiovascular diseases, viral infections, and so forth [29]. It has later been shown that miRNA molecules are essential for the proper development of cardiovascular system [26]. Some of the miRNAs expressed in the heart tissue are miR-21, miR-29a, miR-129, miR-210, miR-211, miR-320, miR-423, and let-7c. In a completely healthy heart tissue miR-1, miR-16, miR-27b, miR-30d, miR-126, miR-133, miR-143, miR-208, and let-7 families are highly expressed [21].

An aberrant presence of miR-21 in the blood vessel wall after balloon damage has been proved by using microarray and Northern blot analysis as well as qRT PCR method [30]. Several studies made miRNA target molecules in the therapy of atherosclerosis, postangioplastic restenosis, transplantation arteriopathy, and cerebral and heart ischaemia [3032]. Cipollone et al. have examined 41 miRNAs and discovered profound differences in the expression of miR-100, miR-127, miR-145, miR-133a, and miR-133b in symptomatic versus asymptomatic plaques [33].

Myocardial hypertrophy represents a great determinant in predicting the mortality and morbidity in cardiovascular diseases [2]. Significant negative effects on the myocardial hypertrophy were obtained by changing the expression of miR-21 by knockdown method, or antisense-mediated depletion method. It can be concluded that miRNA is involved in the process of myocardial hypertrophy and can represent a future target in the therapy of diseases which include myocardial hypertrophy like hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, and endocrine diseases [2]. Studies have shown that miR-1, miR-21, miR-133, miR-195, and miR-208 have the most important role in the development of hypertrophy [25].

Lovren et al. have shown that miRNA-145 is highly expressed in the smooth muscle cells of blood vessels and that its overexpression can lead to the development of atherosclerosis [28]. Other miRNAs expressed in the atherosclerosis are miR-126, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-210 [23, 27]. miRNA-145 molecule controls the differentiation of smooth muscle cells and promotes the formation of lesion; miR-126 sends signals about the need to repair endothelium, while miR-155 indicates the presence of proinflammatory macrophages and atherosclerotic lesions [34, 35]. Research about the influence of miRNA on the development of atherosclerosis is a relatively new field so it is considered that the full clinical potential of this molecule in that area is yet to be demonstrated [26, 34].

Patients with arterial coronary disease have decreased levels of miR-126, miR-145, and miR-155 in circulation. Many studies are currently trying to assess the impact of miR-1, miR-133a, miR-133b, miR-208, miR-499, and miR-499-5p on the development of acute myocardial infarction [21]. It has been proved that miR-208b, miR-499, and miR-320a have been significantly elevated in the patients with acute myocardial infarction; however none of them could be used independently in the diagnostics without cTnT or hsTnT [36]. Wang et al. have reported that elevated levels of cardiac-specific miR-208a in plasma may represent a new biomarker for early detection of myocardial damage [37]. Also circulating miR-1, miR-133a, miR-208b, and miR-499 may be useful biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction, but they are not superior to cTnT [38]. However, according to research circulating miR-499 represents a new early biomarker for the identification of perioperative myocardial infarction in cardiac surgery [39].

Atrial fibrillation is associated with reduced levels of miR-1 in atrial tissue and an overexpression of miR-133 and miR-328 [21, 25]. Cardin et al. have concluded that knockdown of the gene miR-21 in atrium suppresses atrial fibrosis and the onset of atrial fibrillation, and therefore miR-21 is an important signaling molecule for the development of this disorder [40]. It is also considered that miR-1 is responsible for the changes in function of many proteins which take over Ca2+, so it is connected with the onset of ventricular fibrillations [21].

It is considered that miRNAs have a significant impact on the development of hypertension, especially through the influence on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Some of the significant miRNAs for the hypertension onset are miR-181a, miR-663, miR-132, miR-212, miR-143, and miR-145 [21].

The onset of heart failure is connected to miR-122, miR-210, miR-423, miR-5p, miR-499, and miR-622. Research points out to a high specificity of miR-16, miR-27a, miR-101, and miR-150 in predicting the occurrence of left ventricular failure six months after acute myocardial infarction [21]. Circulating miR-423 and miR-5p are considered potential biomarkers of heart failure because they were in correlation with NT-pro-BNP and ejection fraction of the heart [41, 42].

On the other side, miRNA still has a small diagnostic potential when independent of troponin, and test conduction requires too much time [21]. Also there exist difficulties in practice when it comes to measuring absolute levels of miRNA, the lack of standardized protocols, and variations in test performance depending on the laboratory and heparin in the sample represents a significant inhibitor of reactions based on PCR method. Therefore it is crucial to improve methods and standardize protocols before final introduction of this biomarker in practice [43, 44]. However, it is considered that miRNA could represent an important cardiac biomarker in the near future (Table 2).


AuthorsYearStudy typeNumber of patientsStatistical significance

Raitoharju et al. [32]2011Laboratory study12 atherosclerotic plaques

Li et al. [31]2011Clinical study104 patients with atherosclerosis obliteransmiR-21, miR-130a, miR-27b, let-7f, and miR-210 significantly increased

Cipollone et al. [33]2011Laboratory study53 atherosclerotic plaquesmiR-100, miR-127, miR-145, miR-133a, and miR-133b were more expressed in symptomatic versus asymptomatic plaques

Devaux et al. [36]2015Clinical study224 patients with AMImiR-208b, miR-499, and miR-320a were significantly higher in patients with AMI

Wang et al. [37] 2010 Clinical study 66 patientsmiR-1, miR-133a, miR-499, and miR-208a in AMI
33 AMI, 33 non-AMI with chest pain and distress

Li et al. [38]2013Clinical study67 patients with AMImiR-1, miR-133a, miR-208b, and miR-499 in AMI < 0.001

Yao et al. [39]2014Clinical study30 on-pump patients after coronary artery bypass surgery miR-499, ;
miR-133a, ;
miR-133b,

4. The Significance of H-FABP as a Biomarker

Cytoplasmic FABP represent a family of transport proteins which allow the transport of fatty acids through the membranes. FABP show tissue specificity so there exist liver-type FABP (L-FABP), intestinal-type (I-FABP), brain-type FABP (B-FABP), and heart-type FABP (H-FABP). Expression of H-FABP is also specific for brain tissue while the coexpression of H-FABP and L-FABP is specific for kidney tissue [45]. These biomarkers have found their application in liver rejection and kidney viability assessment, in the diagnosis of inflammatory and ischemic intestinal diseases, in traumatic damage of brain tissue, and in the prevention of muscle damage in those who have intensive physical activity [45].

H-FABP represents a small cytosolic protein that functions as a carrier of long chain fatty acids in cardiomyocytes. It is present in high concentrations in myocardial tissue and is quickly released into the circulation after the damage of the myocardial tissue [46, 47].

When it comes to the patients with chest pain in primary medical care, it is considered that H-FABP is the most specific marker besides a highly sensitive troponin T (hs-cTnT) [48].

This molecule is recommended for the initial diagnosis of myocardial infarction as well as for the evaluation of minimal subclinical myocyte injury [1]. H-FABP has proved to be even more successful than cTnT in research when it comes to the diagnosis of myocardial damage in patients with chronic heart failure [1]. A high diagnostic sensitivity of H-FABP after myocardial damage has been proved, even 93.1% higher than CK-MB and cTnT [25]. Therefore it is considered that detection of positive H-FABP or cTnI indicates the possibility of the onset of myocardial damage [1].

H-FABP represents a highly accurate biomarker for the myocardial tissue damage in acute coronary syndromes and enables detection of minor myocardial tissue damage in the heart failure and unstable angina pectoris [45]. Elevated levels of H-FABP are present in circulation as soon as 2 to 3 hours after the damage and return to normal in 12 to 24 hours after the initial insult [25, 46].

The concentration of myoglobin is much higher in muscle tissue than in myocardial while it is reversed when it comes to H-FABP. Therefore it is considered that H-FABP is more specific biomarker for the assessment of myocardial tissue damage [45]. O’Donoghue et al. have shown that elevated levels of H-FABP are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, onset of heart failure, and death during the first 10 months after the acute coronary syndrome. Moreover, this association is independent of other risk predictors (troponin I, creatinine clearance, patient’s history, etc.), age, and sex of the patient [46]. It has been proved that the prognostic significance of H-FABP is highly accurate and it can be successfully interpreted with troponin even in the patients with low and intermediate risk and in the patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Studies indicate that H-FABP can be used as a biomarker of myocardial ischemia even in the absence of evident necrosis [49]. H-FABP and TnT are detectable in venous blood of the patients with chronic heart failure with the ongoing myocardial damage. Some of the research show that H-FABP has a higher specificity [47]. H-FABP has shown to be a far more sensitive biomarker when compared to TnT within the first 6 hours after surviving acute heart damage; however, its specificity is reduced after 6 hours [5053].

It is important to note that not only is H-FABP specific to myocardial tissue, but it is present in skeletal muscle in low concentrations. Most clinicians consider that damage of muscle tissue during the surgery cannot lead to such high levels of H-FABP. However, the damage of kidney tissue during the surgery may result in elevated levels of H-FABP [1]. Also, H-FABP can be elevated in the patients with kidney dysfunction [46].

Further extensive research is necessary in order to evaluate H-FABP as a biomarker of cardiovascular changes and long-term prognosis in the perioperative period (Table 3) [1].


AuthorsYearStudy typeNumber of patientsStatistical significance

Sari et al. [1]2015Clinical study67 patients, 40 with diabetes
O’Donoghue et al. [46]2006Clinical study2287 patients with acute coronary syndromeElevated in 332 patients (14.5%)
Niizeki et al. [47]2007Clinical study126 patients with chronic heart failure
Willemsen et al. [48]2015Clinical study202 patients with acute coronary syndromeAUC 0.79 versus 0.80
Viswanathan et al. [49]2010Clinical study1080 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome
Ruzgar et al. [50]2006Clinical study40 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome
Mad et al. [51] 2007Clinical study22 patients with AMI
20 with unstable angina and 15 with noncardiac chest pain
Liao et al. [52]2009Clinical study74 patients with AMI
Haltern et al. [53]2010Clinical study97 with acute ischaemic chest pain

5. Significance of Proadrenomedullin as a Biomarker

Adrenomedullin (ADM) is a peptide which has rapid clearance from the circulation and a short half-life (22 minutes) and is not practical to be used as a routine biomarker. Midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-PAMP) is released in higher concentrations than ADM; it is inactive and has a longer half-life; therefore it represents a suitable substitute [12, 5456].

Molecule PAMP is secreted from rat cardiomyocytes and there exist specific binding places for PAMP in heart tissue. One of its functions is that it is included in the control of coronary vasculatory tone. The level of PAMP is elevated in the patients with essential hypertension and congestive heart failure [14, 55].

Due to its stability and specificity, MR-PAMP is a significant biomarker for the prediction of heart damage since it basically represents a biomarker of endothelial dysfunction [54, 57]. The level of MR-PAMP is elevated in the patients with heart diseases like congenital heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, and atherosclerosis. It also represents a significant predictor of mortality in these individuals [57]. Smith et al. have shown that MR-PAMP, CRP, and NT-pro-BNP are good predictors of the onset of heart failure and that they are completely independent of the other biomarkers and risk factors [58]. The combination of MR-PAMP and Nt-pro-BNP is suggested for the mortality prediction [59, 60].

It has been examined whether a panel of biomarkers (PCT, MR-PAMP, CT-pro-endothelin-1, CT-pro-arginine vasopressin, and MR-pro-ANP), each separately or using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV score, has a greater significance in the prediction of intrahospital mortality. It has been shown that the greatest significance in the first 6 to 18 hours after entering the ICU has MR-PAMP, even in the case when its significance has been compared to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV score in elective cardiosurgery [61].

Recently published BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) study pointed out that MR-PAMP has a much greater significance than BNP in the mortality prognosis within 90 days in patients with diagnosed acute heart failure [62, 63]. This supports the superiority of MR-PAMP compared to NT-pro-BNP and BNP in the prediction of mortality within 14 days [6265].

A comparative analysis of 12 biomarkers showed that NT-pro-BNP, GDF-15, MR-PAMP, cystatin C, and MR-pro-ANP are the strongest predictors of cardiovascular complications in patients with stable angina pectoris, alone and in combination [66].

Elevated levels of MR-PAMP indicate the existence of coronary heart disease, heart failure, left ventricular failure, and complications in the septic patients [54]. Studies indicate the possibility of using MR-PAMP as a prognostic biomarker for subclinical and manifest cardiovascular diseases (Table 4) [67].


AuthorsYearStudy typeNumber of patientsStatistical significance

Eggers et al. [57]2013Cohort study1797 patients over 70 years of age
Smith et al. [58]2010Cohort study5187 individuals Heart failure, ; atrial fibrillation,
Von Haehling et al. [59]2007Clinical study525 patients with chronic heart failure
Von Haehling et al. [60]2010Clinical study501 patients with chronic heart failure

6. Conclusion

Preoperative prediction of cardiovascular risk in patients who are preparing for non-cardiac surgery is essential. New protocols have confirmed that biomarkers have a significant role in that. The “multimarker strategy” is highly present in contemporary clinical practice because there are no independent biomarkers which would timely and accurately indicate the cardiomyocyte damage. The task of future studies is to find the “so-called” ideal biomarker, and studies which evaluate miRNA, H-FABP, and MR-PAMP give encouraging results.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. M. Sari, H. Kilic, O. Karakurt Ariturk, N. Yazihan, and R. Akdemir, “Diabetic patients have increased perioperative cardiac risk in heart-type fatty acid-binding protein-based assessment,” Medical Principles and Practice, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Cheng, R. Ji, J. Yue et al., “MicroRNAs are aberrantly expressed in hypertrophic heart: Do they play a role in cardiac hypertrophy?” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 170, no. 6, pp. 1831–1840, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. L. Goldman, “Cardiac risks and complications of noncardiac surgery,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 198, no. 6, pp. 780–791, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Licker, A. Schweizer, C. Ellenberger, J.-M. Tschopp, J. Diaper, and F. Clergue, “Perioperative medical management of patients with COPD,” The International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 493–515, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  5. C. Schrimpf, H. Gillmann, B. Sahlmann et al., “Renal function interferes with copeotin in prediction of major adverse cardiac events in patients indergoing vascular surgery,” PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e0123093, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. H. Fitchett, S. G. Goodman, and A. Langer, “Ischemic stroke: a cardiovascular risk equivalent? Lessons learned from the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 705–708, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. H. Lee, E. R. Marcantonio, C. M. Mangione et al., “Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery,” Circulation, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 1043–1049, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. The Joint Task Force on Non-Cardiac Surgery: Cardiovascular Assessment and Management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA), “2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 31, pp. 517–573, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. Kemp, J. Donovan, H. Higham, and J. Hooper, “Biochemical markers of myocardial injury,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. P. Kalogeropoulos, V. V. Georgiopoulou, and J. Butler, “Clinical adoption of prognostic biomarkers: The case for heart failure,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. A. Hlatky, P. Greenland, D. K. Arnett et al., “Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 119, no. 17, pp. 2408–2416, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. Iqbal, B. Wentworth, R. Choudhary et al., “Cardiac biomarkers: new tools for heart failure management,” Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147–164, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  13. G. Loncar, V. Tscholl, E. Tahirovic et al., “Should procalcitonin be measured routinely in acute decompensated heart failure?” Biomarkers in Medicine, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 651–659, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Loncar, D. Omersa, N. Cvetinovic, A. Arandjelovic, and M. Lainscak, “Emerging biomarkers in heart failure and cardiac cachexia,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 23878–23896, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Marcun, A. Sustic, P. M. Brguljan et al., “Cardiac biomarkers predict outcome after hospitalisation for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 156–159, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Lainscak, S. von Haehling, and S. D. Anker, “Natriuretic peptides and other biomarkers in chronic heart failure: From BNP, NT-proBNP, and MR-proANP to routine biochemical markers,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 303–311, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. W. Hochholzer, D. A. Morrow, and R. P. Giugliano, “Novel biomarkers in cardiovascular disease: update 2010,” American Heart Journal, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 583–594, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. B. P. Lewis, C. B. Burge, and D. P. Bartel, “Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets,” Cell, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Zhang, “MicroRNAs: role in cardiovascular biology and disease,” Clinical Science, vol. 114, no. 11-12, pp. 699–706, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. V. N. Kim, “Small RNAs: classification, biogenesis, and function,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  21. S. P. Romaine, M. Tomaszewski, G. Condorelli, and N. J. Samani, “MicroRNAs in cardiovascular disease: an introduction for clinicians,” Heart, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 921–928, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. Thum, “Facts and updates about cardiovascular non-coding RNAs in heart failure,” ESC Heart Failure, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 108–111, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H.-W. Hwang and J. T. Mendell, “MicroRNAs in cell proliferation, cell death, and tumorigenesis,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 776–780, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Jovanovic and M. O. Hengartner, “miRNAs and apoptosis: RNAs to die for,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 46, pp. 6176–6187, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Gupta, P. Shukla, and V. D. Ashwalayan, “Clinical assessment of cardiovascular disorders by cardiac biomarkers,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 87–94, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  26. E. Raitoharju, N. Oksala, and T. Lehtimäki, “MicroRNAs in the atherosclerotic plaque,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1708–1721, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. A. Kondkar and K. K. Abu-Amero, “Utility of circulating MicroRNAs as clinical biomarkers for cardiovascular diseases,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 821823, 10 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. Lovren, Y. Pan, A. Quan et al., “microRNA-145 targeted therapy reduces atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 126, no. 11, pp. S81–S90, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. I. Faraoni, F. R. Antonetti, J. Cardone, and E. Bonmassar, “miR-155 gene: a typical multifunctional microRNA,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1792, no. 6, pp. 497–505, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. Ji, Y. Cheng, J. Yue et al., “MicroRNA expression signature and antisense-mediated depletion reveal an essential role of MicroRNA in vascular neointimal lesion formation,” Circulation Research, vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 1579–1588, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. Li, H. Cao, J. Zhuang et al., “Identification of miR-130a, miR-27b and miR-210 as serum biomarkers for atherosclerosis obliterans,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 412, no. 1-2, pp. 66–70, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. Raitoharju, L.-P. Lyytikäinen, M. Levula et al., “miR-21, miR-210, miR-34a, and miR-146a/b are up-regulated in human atherosclerotic plaques in the Tampere Vascular Study,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 211–217, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. F. Cipollone, L. Felicioni, R. Sarzani et al., “A unique MicroRNA signature associated with plaque instability in humans,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2556–2563, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Y. Wei, M. Nazari-Jahantigh, P. Neth, C. Weber, and A. Schober, “ATVB in focus: MicroRNAs—from basic mechanisms to clinical application in cardiovascular medicine; MicroRNA-126, -145, and -155: a therapeutic triad in atherosclerosis?” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 449–454, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. Raitoharju, N. Oksala, and T. Lehtimäki, “microRNAs in the atherosclerotic plaque,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1708–1721, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Devaux, M. Mueller, P. Haaf et al., “Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating microRNAs in patients with acute chest pain,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 277, no. 2, pp. 260–271, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G.-K. Wang, J.-Q. Zhu, J.-T. Zhang et al., “Circulating microRNA: a novel potential biomarker for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in humans,” European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 659–666, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y.-Q. Li, M.-F. Zhang, H.-Y. Wen et al., “Comparing the diagnostic values of circulating microRNAs and cardiac troponin T in patients with acute myocardial infarction,” Clinics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. Yao, J. Du, X. Cao et al., “Plasma levels of microRNA-499 provide an early indication of perioperative myocardial infarction in coronary artery bypass graft patients,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 8, Article ID e104618, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Cardin, E. Guasch, X. Luo et al., “Role for MicroRNA-21 in atrial profibrillatory fibrotic remodeling associated with experimental postinfarction heart failure,” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1027–1035, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. J. Tijsen, E. E. Creemers, P. D. Moerland et al., “MiR423-5p as a circulating biomarker for heart failure,” Circulation Research, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1035–1039, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. K. Gupta, C. Bang, and T. Thum, “Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers and potential paracrine mediators of cardiovascular disease,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 484–488, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Zampetaki and M. Mayr, “Analytical challenges and technical limitations in assessing circulating MiRNAs,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 592–598, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. S. Elton, M. Khan, and D. Terentyev, “microRNAs in cardiovascular disease,” F1000 Medicine Reports, vol. 3, article 10, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. M. A. L. Pelsers, W. T. Hermens, and J. F. C. Glatz, “Fatty acid-binding proteins as plasma markers of tissue injury,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 352, no. 1-2, pp. 15–35, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. O'Donoghue, J. A. de Lemos, D. A. Morrow et al., “Prognostic utility of heart-type fatty acid binding protein in patients with acute coronary syndromes,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 550–557, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. T. Niizeki, Y. Takeishi, T. Arimoto et al., “Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein is more sensitive than troponin T to detect the ongoing myocardial damage in chronic heart failure patients,” Journal of Cardiac Failure, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 120–127, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. T. Willemsen, E. Van Severen, P. M. Vandervoort et al., “Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) in patients in an emergency department setting, suspected of acute coronary syndrome: optimal cut-off point, diagnostic value and future opportunities in primary care,” European Journal of General Practice, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. K. Viswanathan, N. Kilcullen, C. Morrell et al., “Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein predicts long-term mortality and re-infarction in consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome who are troponin-negative,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 55, no. 23, pp. 2590–2598, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. O. Ruzgar, A. K. Bilge, Z. Bugra et al., “The use of human heart-type fatty acid-binding protein as an early diagnostic biochemical marker of myocardial necrosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome, and its comparison with troponin-T and creatine kinase-myocardial band,” Heart and Vessels, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 309–314, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. Mad, H. Domanovits, C. Fazelnia et al., “Human heart-type fatty-acid-binding protein as a point-of-care test in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction,” QJM, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 203–210, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. J. Liao, C. P.-Y. Chan, Y.-C. Cheung et al., “Human heart-type fatty acid-binding protein for on-site diagnosis of early acute myocardial infarction,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 420–423, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. G. Haltern, S. Peiniger, A. Bufe, G. Reiss, H. Gülker, and T. Scheffold, “Comparison of usefulness of heart-type fatty acid binding protein versus cardiac troponin T for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. G. W. D. Landman, P. R. van Dijk, I. Drion et al., “Midregional fragment of proadrenomedullin, new-onset albuminuria, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with Type 2 Diabetes (ZODIAC-30),” Diabetes Care, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 839–845, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Z. Kaygısız, H. Özden, N. Erkasap et al., “Effects of proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide and calcitonin on isolated perfused rat hearts,” Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 176–182, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  56. T. Tsuruda, J. Kato, K. Kitamura et al., “Secretion of proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide from cultured neonatal rat cardiac cells,” Life Sciences, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 239–245, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. K. M. Eggers, P. Venge, B. Lindahl, and L. Lind, “Associations of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin levels to cardiovascular and metabolic abnormalities, and mortality in an elderly population from the community,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 168, no. 4, pp. 3537–3542, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J. G. Smith, C. Newton-Cheh, P. Almgren et al., “Assessment of conventional cardiovascular risk factors and multiple biomarkers for the prediction of incident heart failure and atrial fibrillation,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 56, no. 21, pp. 1712–1719, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. S. Von Haehling, E. A. Jankowska, N. G. Morgenthaler et al., “Comparison of midregional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in predicting survival in patients with chronic heart failure,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 20, pp. 1973–1980, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. Von Haehling, G. S. Filippatos, J. Papassotiriou et al., “Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin as a novel predictor of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure,” European Journal of Heart Failure, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 484–491, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. Schoe, E. F. Schippers, J. Struck et al., “Postoperative pro-adrenomedullin levels predict mortality in thoracic surgery patients: comparison with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV Score,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 373–381, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. Maisel, C. Mueller, R. M. Nowak et al., “Midregion prohormone adrenomedullin and prognosis in patients presenting with acute dyspnea: results from the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1057–1067, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. Maisel, C. Mueller, R. Nowak et al., “Mid-region pro-hormone markers for diagnosis and prognosis in acute dyspnea: results from the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 55, no. 19, pp. 2062–2076, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. W. F. Peacock, “Novel biomarkers in acute heart failure: MR-pro-adrenomedullin,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1433–1435, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. Potocki, R. Ziller, and C. Mueller, “Mid-Regional pro-adrenomedullin in acute heart failure: a better biomarker or just another biomarker,” Current Heart Failure Reports, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 244–251, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. R. B. Schnabel, A. Schulz, C. M. Messow et al., “Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease,” European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 24, pp. 3024–3031, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. T. Neumann, S. Tzikas, A. Funke-Kaiser et al., “Association of MR-proadrenomedullin with cardiovascular risk factors and subclinical cardiovascular disease,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 451–459, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. F. C. Glatz, M. van Bilsen, R. J. A. Paulussen, J. H. Veerkamp, G. J. van der Vusse, and R. S. Reneman, “Release of fatty acid-binding protein from isolated rat heart subjected to ischemia and reperfusion or to the calcium paradox,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Lipids and Lipid Metabolism, vol. 961, no. 1, pp. 148–152, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. S. Ladue and F. Wroblewski, “The significance of the serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase activity following acute myocardial infarction,” Circulation, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 871–877, 1955. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. W. E. C. Wacker, D. D. Ulmer, and B. L. Vallee, “Metalloenzymes and myocardial infarction—malic and lactic dehydrogenase activities and zinc concentrations in serum,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 255, pp. 449–456, 1956. View at: Google Scholar
  71. R. J. Duma and A. L. Siegel, “Serum creatinine phosphokinase in acute myocardial infarction; diagnostic value,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 115, pp. 443–451, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. B. Rosalki, “Serum α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase: a new test for myocardial infarction,” British Heart Journal, vol. 25, pp. 795–802, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. D. J. Blomberg, W. D. Kimber, and M. D. Burke, “Creatine kinase isoenzymes: predictive value in the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 464–469, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. el Allaf, J.-P. Chapelle, D. el Allaf et al., “Differentiating muscle damage from myocardial injury by means of the serum creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme MB mass measurement/total CK activity ratio,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 291–295, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  75. H. J. Saranchak and S. H. Bernstein, “A new diagnostic test for acute myocardial infarction. The detection of myoglobinuria by radioimmunodiffusion assay,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 228, no. 10, pp. 1251–1255, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. Mair, F. Dienstl, and B. Pushendorf, “Cardiac troponin T in the diagnosis of myocardial injury,” Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 31–57, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  77. B. Cummins, M. L. Auckland, and P. Cummins, “Cardiac-specific troponin-l radioimmunoassay in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction,” The American Heart Journal, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 1333–1344, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. T. Shimosawa, Y. Shibagaki, K. Ishibashi et al., “Adrenomedullin, an endogenous peptide, counteracts cardiovascular damage,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 106–111, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Radmilo Janković et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1440 Views | 702 Downloads | 9 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.