Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 535982, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/535982
Research Article

Individual CLA Isomers, c9t11 and t10c12, Prevent Excess Liver Glycogen Storage and Inhibit Lipogenic Genes Expression Induced by High-Fructose Diet in Rats

1Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Technology, Agricultural University of Krakow, Balicka 122, 30-149 Krakow, Poland
2Jagiellonian Centre for Experimental Therapeutics (JCET), Jagiellonian University, Bobrzynskiego 14, 30-348 Krakow, Poland
3Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Food Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, C. K. Norwida 25, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland
4Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathomorphology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Grzegorzecka 16, 31-531 Krakow, Poland
5Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Grzegorzecka 16, 31-531 Krakow, Poland

Received 10 October 2014; Revised 12 January 2015; Accepted 26 February 2015

Academic Editor: Maria J. Martins

Copyright © 2015 Edyta Maslak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study assessed the effects of individual conjugated linoleic acid isomers, c9t11-CLA and t10c12-CLA, on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and systemic endothelial dysfunction in rats fed for four weeks with control or high-fructose diet. The high-fructose diet hampered body weight gain (without influencing food intake), increased liver weight and glycogen storage in hepatocytes, upregulated expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) and stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD-1), and increased saturated fatty acid (SFA) content in the liver. Both CLA isomers prevented excessive accumulation of glycogen in the liver. Specifically, t10c12-CLA decreased concentration of serum triacylglycerols and LDL + VLDL cholesterol, increased HDL cholesterol, and affected liver lipid content and fatty acid composition by downregulation of liver SCD-1 and FAS expression. In turn, the c9t11-CLA decreased LDL+VLDL cholesterol in the control group and downregulated liver expression of FAS without significant effects on liver weight, lipid content, and fatty acid composition. In summary, feeding rats with a high-fructose diet resulted in increased liver glycogen storage, indicating the induction of gluconeogenesis despite simultaneous upregulation of genes involved in de novo lipogenesis. Although both CLA isomers (c9t11 and t10c12) display hepatoprotective activity, the hypolipemic action of the t10c12-CLA isomer proved to be more pronounced than that of c9t11-CLA.

1. Introduction

The metabolic syndrome (MS) is a cluster of interrelated risk factors that promote the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Recently, MS was also found to be a strong predictor of NAFLD, which is widely accepted to be the hepatic manifestation of MS [1, 2]. To date, increased fat consumption is considered the major pathogenic factor of MS and NAFLD. However, recent data show that elevated consumption of fructose may also contribute to the development of those diseases. Studies in humans and experimental animals demonstrate that increased intake of fructose can result in hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, and liver steatosis [35]. Moreover, the existence of cross talk between the liver and vascular wall might specifically account for the strong associations between liver steatosis and accelerated atherosclerosis. It has been shown that severe hepatic steatosis was linked to increased atherogenesis in diabetic patients by increased plasma TG, LDL, and VLDL concentrations and decreased HDL level and insulin resistance [6].

CLA comprises a group of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid (C18:2, n-6). In contrast to the chain structure of the linoleic acid, in CLA the double bonds are separated by only one single bond and occur most frequently at carbons 9 and 11 as well as 10 and 12 forming c9t11 and t10c12-CLA isomers [7]. Studies have shown that CLA isomers actively inhibit carcinogenesis [8] and prevent atherosclerosis [9], diabetes [1012], obesity [13, 14], and osteoporosis [1517]. Recently, it has been shown that CLA can prevent NAFLD induced by a high-fat diet [18] and influence endothelium-mediated vascular homeostasis, by reducing the release of proinflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandin E2 and the vasoconstrictive agent thromboxane A2, within vascular endothelial cells [19, 20]. However, the effects of individual CLA isomers, c9t11 and t10c12-CLA, on fructose-induced NAFLD and endothelial dysfunction have not been investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Experimental Design

Male Wistar rats at an initial body weight of approximately 100 g were divided into 6 experimental groups and fed for 4 weeks with either the control AIN-93G diet (C), a high-fructose diet (F, 63% fructose), or C and F diets supplemented with 1% c9t11 and t10c12-CLA isomers (Larodan Fine Chemicals, Malmo, Sweden). The addition of individual CLA isomers was calculated considering the purity of c9t11 (75%) and t10c12 (90%) and balanced at the expense of quantity consisted of soybean oil (Table 1). The control and experimental diets were prepared freshly according to Reeves et al. [21] and stored in darkness at 4°C to avoid lipid peroxidation.

Table 1: Composition of the experimental diets.

Rats were housed in collective cages (3 rats per cage) in a room with a 12 h light-dark cycle and were given ad libitum access to diet and water. Rats were weighed weekly, and leftover food was measured daily for the calculation of food intake.

All procedures involving animals were conducted according to the Guidelines for Animal Care and Treatment of the European Union and were approved by the Local Animal Ethics Commission.

2.2. Blood Biochemistry

Blood samples were collected from the heart and centrifuged (1000 ×g for 10 min.) to obtain serum. Serum samples were analysed using commercially available kits for total cholesterol (CHOL), HDL, and TG (Liquick Cor no. 2-211, 2-217, 2-262, resp., Cormay, Lublin, Poland). LDL + VLDL concentration was calculated as the difference between CHOL and HDL concentrations. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were measured by commercially available kits (numbers A6624-050 and A6661-050, Alpha Diagnostics, Warsaw, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Blood glucose concentrations were measured using an Accu-Chek Active glucose meter (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Uric acid (UA) was analysed using commercially available kit (no. K6681-050, Alpha Diagnostics, Warsaw, Poland).

2.3. Histological Evaluation

Fragments of livers were fixed in 4% buffered formalin and prepared according to the standard paraffin method. Paraffin-embedded 5 μm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for general histology and the Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) method was used for glycogen visualization. Sections were photographed under the 200x magnification with a Nikon Eclipse E400 light microscope equipped with a Nikon digital sight DS-Fi1 camera and NIS-Elements software (Nikon GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany).

2.4. Liver Fat Content

Liver fragments were lyophilized and ground. The determination of fat content was performed with a Foss Tecator Extraction system Soxtec Avanti 2050 (Tecator Foss, Hillerød, Sweden) by continuous extraction of the fat from the material and then evaporating the solvent and drying and weighing the residue.

2.5. Liver Fatty Acid Composition

The liver lipid extraction was obtained according to the previously described method [22]. Briefly, the extracted fat was saponified (10 min. at 75°C) with a 0.5 M solution of KOH/MetOH and subjected to methylation (10 min. at 75°C) in 14% (v/v) BF3/MetOH (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Then, the methyl esters of fatty acids were extracted with hexane (Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A., Gliwice, Poland) and analysed using a gas chromatograph coupled with a mass spectrometer (Shimadzu GCMS QP 5050, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Separation was achieved using SP-2560 capillary column with a length of 100 m, inner diameter of 0.25 mm, and film thickness of 0.25 μm (Supelco, St. Louis, MO, USA). Helium was the carrier gas.

Identification of methyl esters of long-chain fatty acids was based on the reference standards (FAME Mixture, Larodan Fine Chemicals, Malmo, Sweden) and a library of mass spectra (NIST 1.7). Percentage of methyl esters of fatty acids was calculated from the analytical signal with the formula where is the th signal of the ester and is the sum of all identified analytical signal esters [23].

2.6. Real-Time qRT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from liver samples with a “Total RNA” kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instruction and quantified with a NanoDrop 1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware, USA). Subsequently, samples were purified with an RNeasyMinElute Cleanup kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and analysed with a BioAnalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, California, USA) to measure final RNA quality and integrity.

Expression of the FAS and SCD-1 genes was checked by qRT-PCR with the following primers: 5′-TCGACCTGCTGACGTCTATG-3′ (forward), 5′-TCTTCCCAGGACAAACCAAC-3′ (reverse) and 5′-TCCTGCTCATGTGCTTCATC-3′ (forward), 5′-GGATGTTCTCCCGAGATTGA-3′ (reverse). FAS and SCD-1 mRNA sample concentrations were analysed using a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) with a SYBR-green fluorochrome (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Results are presented as the ratio of the expression of each gene to β-actin expression (β-actin primers: 5′-ACATCCGTAAAGACCTCTATGCCAACA-3′ (forward), 5′-GTGCTAGGAGCCAGGGCAGTAATCT-3′ (reverse)).

2.7. Assessment of Endothelial Function

Thoracic aortas were carefully dissected out of the surrounding tissues. The assessment of NO-dependent endothelial function in the isolated rings of rat aortas was determined by dose-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine (Ach, 0.01–10 µM, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) both without and in the presence of the inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase Nω-Nitro-L-Arginine Methyl Ester (L-NAME, 300 μM, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as previously described [24]. The endothelium-independent response was tested by a response evoked by sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 0.001–1 µM, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means ± SEM. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to test the assumption of normality. Based on those results, either a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan post-hoc test were used to assess the statistical significance at a significance level of . The results were analysed using STATISTICA 10.0 software.

3. Results

3.1. Body Weight and Food Intake

The final body weight gain of the high-fructose-fed rats (group F) was significantly less than that of rats in group C. The CLA isomers had no effect on body weight in rats fed with diet C, while rats fed with diets F + c9t11 and F + t10c12-CLA gained significantly more weight than rats from group F, reaching weights similar to those of C group (Figure 1(a)). The changes in body weight did not depend on the food intake, which did not differ between experimental groups (Figure 1(b)).

Figure 1: Body weight gain (a) and food intake (b) of rats fed with experimental diets. Values are means ± SEM (). Values with different superscript letters were significantly different ().
3.2. Plasma Biochemistry

No changes in serum lipid profile were observed after four weeks of feeding rats with a high-fructose diet (group F) compared with group C. The addition of the t10c12-CLA isomer decreased LDL + VLDL in C + t10c12 and F + t10c12 groups by 50% and 60%, respectively, and increased HDL concentration by 65% in rats from the F + t10c12 group. In turn, c9t11-CLA decreased LDL + VLDL by 50% only in the group receiving the C + c9t11 diet. No changes were observed in TG concentration between groups C and F; however, TG concentration decreased in the F + t10c12 group compared with the F + c9t11 group and increased in F + c9t11 versus C + c9t11.

Although no differences were observed in serums ALT and AST between groups C and F, addition of c9t11-CLA to a high-fructose diet (F + c9t11 group) significantly decreased ALT concentration in rats compared with rats in the C + c9t11 group. The glucose and UA concentration did not differ between experimental groups (Table 2).

Table 2: Lipid profile, UA, glucose concentration, and enzyme activities (AST, ALT) in rats fed with experimental diets.
3.3. Liver Weight and Fatty Acid Composition

The high-fructose diet increased liver weight in rats (20% versus control group, ) in comparison with control group. The CLA isomers (c9t11 and t10c12) had no effect on rats liver weight. Interestingly, the liver lipids content did not differ between groups C and F, while the addition of the t10c12-CLA isomer to diets C and F led to a significant reduction in the liver lipids. The c9t11-CLA isomer had no effects on lipids storage in the rats’ livers (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Liver weight (a) and total liver lipids content (b) in rats fed with experimental diets. Values are means ± SEM (). Values with different superscript letters were significantly different ().

Analysis of liver fatty acid composition revealed that CLA isomers (c9t11 and t10c12) were incorporated into liver lipids, whereas they were not found in the livers of rats fed with control or high-fructose diets (Table 3). Moreover, in C + t10c12 and F + t10c12 groups a small amount of c9t11-CLA isomers was observed.

Table 3: Liver fatty acid composition of Wistar rats after four weeks of experimental diets.

The high-fructose diet significantly increased total SFA and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and decreased total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in the liver compared with the control group. Among rats fed with a high-fructose diet, addition of the t10c12-CLA isomer increased total SFA and decreased total MUFA (), while c9t11-CLA had no effect on SFA, MUFA, nor PUFA level. Moreover, a high-fructose diet significantly increased the 16 : 1 to 16 : 0 ratio in the liver, while addition of t10c12-CLA isomer resulted in a significant decrease in 16 : 1 to 16 : 0 and 18 : 1 to 18 : 0 ratios (Table 3).

3.4. Liver Histopathology

The high-fructose diet resulted in excessive glycogen storage into hepatocytes without the appearance of steatosis or inflammation, compared with the control group. The CLA isomers, c9t11 and t10c12-CLA, significantly decreased glycogen content in the liver in rats fed with the high-fructose diet (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Histopathological images of rat liver samples after four weeks of experimental diets. (a) HE staining. (b) PAS staining. Scale bar = 50 μm.
3.5. Gene Expression Analyses (Real-Time PCR)

The high-fructose diet increased mRNA expression of FAS and SCD-1 in the liver compared with control animals. The addition of individual isomers to the control diet had no effect on gene expression levels in the liver. Among rats fed with the high-fructose diet, both c9t11 and t10c12-CLA isomers significantly decreased FAS expression, while SCD-1 expression was decreased only in the t10c12-CLA isomer group (Figure 4).

Figure 4: mRNA gene expression of FAS (a) and SCD-1 (b) in rats liver after four weeks of experimental diets. Values are means ± SEM (). Values with different superscript letters were significantly different ().
3.6. Assessment of Endothelial Function

The high-fructose diet had no effect on the magnitude of NO-dependent vasodilatation in aorta induced by Ach. The addition of individual CLA isomers (c9t11 and t10c12) to the high-fructose diet resulted in a slightly, but not significantly improved endothelial function observed as an increased NO-dependent vasodilatation at low concentration of Ach (0.03 μM), while no statistically significant difference in Ach-dependent response was at high concentration of Ach (1 μM) (Figure 5). Furthermore, in the presence of L-NAME (300 μM) the Ach-induced vasodilatation in aorta rings was substantially inhibited in all experimental groups. The endothelium-independent response to SNP was not affected by experimental treatment.

Figure 5: NO-dependent vasodilatation in aortas induced by acetylcholine in rats after four weeks of experimental diets. Values are means (). Values with different superscript letters were significantly different ().

4. Discussion

In the present study, we found that a high-fructose diet decreased body weight gain without an effect on food intake and induced liver enlargement associated with excessive accumulation of glycogen in hepatocytes. Simultaneously, upregulation of mRNA expression of lipogenic genes, FAS and SCD-1, and changes in liver fatty acids composition were observed. The addition of CLA isomers (c9t11 and t10c12) to the high-fructose diet exhibited hepatoprotective effects manifested as reduced glycogen content in the liver. Moreover, t10c12-CLA, but not c9t11-CLA, decreased the concentration of serum TG (although not significantly) and LDL + VLDL cholesterol and increased HDL level. Additionally, t10c12-CLA reduced liver lipid content and affected fatty acid composition by downregulating liver SCD-1 and FAS expression. Similarly, c9t11-CLA decreased liver mRNA expression of FAS, though it had no significant effect on SCD-1. The slightly improved NO-dependent function in aortas from rats fed with the high-fructose diet and either c9t11 or t10c12 may suggest a vasoprotective effect of CLA isomers, but further studies would be necessary to confirm these findings.

Several studies have shown that high-fructose intake may lead to adverse metabolic alteration, in particular increase in plasma TG, hepatic insulin resistance, and liver steatosis [3, 25]. ALT and AST are commonly used in the assessment of liver function. An increase in ALT activity is often associated with the development of fatty liver, although some authors do not confirm these observations and show that the absence of elevated liver enzymes does not exclude NAFLD diagnosis [26, 27]. In the current work, in which the effect of short-term high-fructose diet was studied, liver enzyme concentrations showed no differences among experimental groups; however, increased liver weight compared with control animals was observed. Some investigators have hypothesized that these effects may be due to increased lipid content in the liver [2830]. To test this hypothesis, we assessed liver total lipid content and performed histological analysis of the liver samples. The results showed increased glycogen storage in rats fed with the high-fructose diet without a difference in liver fat content between the control and high-fructose groups, indicating the predominance of gluconeogenesis over de novo fatty acid synthesis in the early phase response to a high-fructose diet. Interestingly, further analysis of mRNA expression of two lipogenic genes, FAS and SCD-1, exhibited upregulation of both after consuming the high-fructose diet. These observations clearly show that the adverse effect of fructose on glucose metabolism in the liver is closely linked to the alterations in lipid metabolism. Although we did not observe any differences in liver lipid content after the high-fructose diet, we did observe significant alterations in liver fatty acid composition in rats. We found that the high-fructose diet increased liver SFA and MUFA with a simultaneous reduction in PUFA content. Previously, it was shown that the balance between SFA and UFA is a prognostic marker in NAFLD/NASH [31, 32], as well as in cardiovascular and total mortality in humans [33]. As lipids play a crucial role not only in energy storage but also as structural components of cellular membranes and actively participate in cellular signalling, observed in the current study, altered balance between SFA and UFA is of great importance. Furthermore, it has been previously shown that SFA and UFA had distinct impact on cell viability and apoptosis [34]. SFA (palmitic acid (C16:0) and oleic acid (C18:0)) were shown to increase apoptosis of endothelial cells, while UFA (palmitoleic acid (C16:1), oleic acid (C18:1), and linoleic acid (C18:2)) did not promote apoptosis but prevented stearate-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells [34]. Moreover, myotubes’ exposure to SFA (C16:0 and C18:0), but not to UFA (C16:1, C18:1, and C18:2), resulted in activation of an inflammatory response due to induction of COX-2 expression and subsequent prostaglandin E2 production [35]. In the current study, the fructose-induced alterations in SFA, MUFA, and UFA content were largely due to significant increases in C16:0 and decreases in C18:2 and linolenic acid (C18:3). An increased C16:0 level has been shown to induce accumulation of ceramides leading to a significant decrease in NO generation and insulin resistance [36, 37]. A depletion in NO bioavailability and insulin resistance is associated with liver steatosis [38, 39], suggesting a prominent pathogenetic role of fructose in liver injury. Interestingly, in the current study, the high-fructose diet also increased C16:1 concentration; however, since C16:1 was showed to be, apart from C18:1, the most abundant monounsaturated fatty acid in various kinds of lipids, including phospholipids, triglycerides, cholesterol esters, wax esters, and alkyldiacylglycerols [40], its increased concentration in a state of upregulation of lipogenic genes is not surprising.

In the present work we did not find any effects of high-fructose diet on endothelial function assessed as NO-dependent vasodilation in aortic rings [41]. This is probably due to the relatively short time of high-fructose feeding. Bartuś et al. [42] observed endothelial dysfunction after eight weeks of feeding rats with a high-fructose diet. Quite surprisingly, we found that both individual isomers tend to improve endothelium-dependent responses induced by a low concentration of Ach. As proper endothelial function inhibits leukocyte recruitment, smooth muscle cell proliferation, and development of atherosclerotic plaques [43] and both t10c12 and c9t11-CLA slightly improved endothelial function, these findings may have therapeutic implications. It is notable that improvement was comparable with control and high-fructose groups, as high-fructose diet showed no effect on endothelial function in the current study. Interestingly, the c9t11-CLA isomer reduced ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression in endothelium and reduced the adhesion of macrophages to endothelium [44], while the t10c12-CLA isomer activated vascular eNOS in an adiponectin-dependent manner [45]. Obviously, CLA isomers may display vasoprotective activity that warrants further studies.

In the present work, we have shown that both isomers exhibited hepatoprotective properties, although the effects of t10c12-CLA were more pronounced than those of c9t11-CLA. The action of t10c12-CLA, unlike c9t11-CLA, involved improvements not only in liver glycogen storage but also in plasma lipid profile and liver lipid content (some of them in treated rats compared with rats in the high-fructose and control groups). These observations may be partially explained by the increased β-oxidation or/and higher hepatic TG secretion induced by t10c12-CLA [4648]. The involved mechanism may also be linked with inhibition of lipogenesis. In the current study, we showed that t10c12-CLA decreased mRNA expression of liver two lipogenic genes, FAS and SCD-1, in rats. Moreover, as a result, changes in the composition of liver fatty acids were observed. The modulation of liver fatty acid composition by mixture of CLA isomers has been confirmed previously [49]. Intake of t10c12-CLA has also been shown to cause an increase of C18:0 and a commensurate decrease of C18:1 in rat livers [50] and mouse adipocyte cultures [51]. In the current study, we also observed a decrease in 18 : 1 to 18 : 0 and 16 : 1 to 16 : 0 ratios in liver lipids, indicating diminished SCD-1 activity. Thus, downregulation of hepatic FAS and SCD-1 expression may contribute to the mechanism of hepatic lipid content reduction and improvement in lipoprotein profile by the intake of t10c12-CLA. Although the c9t11-CLA isomer induced reduction of FAS expression, its effect was not visible in other measurements, suggesting that its effect on lipid metabolism is modest and probably differs from t10c12-CLA.

Reports on the biological effects of CLA isomers differ among species used in the studies. Results from rats and mice are especially ambiguous. While t10c12-CLA increased TG concentration and induced liver steatosis in mice [52, 53], data from studies on rats, similar to results obtained in the current study, showed protective effects of t10c12-CLA against hyperlipidemia and increased liver weight and lipid content [54]. There are many data in the literature that show important differences in metabolic regulation of lipids among different hamster [55], mice [56], and rat strains [57].

In conclusion, in the current study we showed that a short-term high-fructose diet leads to liver enlargement associated with excessive glycogen storage in hepatocytes. This is accompanied by a simultaneous alteration in liver fatty acid composition and upregulation of genes involved in de novo lipogenesis, indicating a predominance of gluconeogenesis over de novo fatty acids synthesis in the early phase of liver response to fructose feeding. Although both CLA isomers (c9t11 and t10c12) showed hepatoprotective effects, the hypolipemic action of the t10c12-CLA isomer was more pronounced than that of c9t11-CLA due to its favourable alteration of the plasma lipid profile, decreased liver lipid content, and beneficial changes in liver fatty acid composition. These results are intriguing, and possible effects of CLA on endothelial function are not conclusive and warrant further studies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the State Committee for Scientific Research in Poland (NCN), Grant no. N N312 110838, and partially by the European Union from the resources of the European Regional Development Fund under the Innovative Economy Programme (Grant coordinated by JCET-UJ, no. POIG.01.01.02-00-069/09).

References

  1. A. Kotronen, J. Westerbacka, R. Bergholm, K. H. Pietiläinen, and H. Yki-Järvinen, “Liver fat in the metabolic syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 3490–3497, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Marchesini, E. Bugianesi, G. Forlani et al., “Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome,” Hepatology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 917–923, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. S. Lim, M. Mietus-Snyder, A. Valente, J.-M. Schwarz, and R. H. Lustig, “The role of fructose in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the metabolic syndrome,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 251–264, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. O. Lee, W. R. Bruce, Q. Dong, J. Bruce, R. Mehta, and P. J. O'Brien, “Fructose and carbonyl metabolites as endogenous toxins,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 178, no. 1–3, pp. 332–339, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. B. Kostogrys and P. M. Pisulewski, “Effect of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on lipid profile and liver histology in laboratory rats fed high-fructose diet,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 245–250, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. G. S. Toledo, A. D. Sniderman, and D. E. Kelley, “Influence of hepatic steatosis (fatty liver) on severity and composition of dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1845–1850, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. C. Martin and K. Valeille, “Conjugated linoleic acids: all the same or to everyone its own function?” Reproduction Nutrition Development, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 525–536, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. W. Pariza, Y. Park, and M. E. Cook, “The biologically active isomers of conjugated linoleic acid,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 283–298, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. L. Mitchell and R. S. McLeod, “Conjugated linoleic acid and atherosclerosis: studies in animal models,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. W. Ryder, C. P. Portocarrero, X. M. Song et al., “Isomer-specific antidiabetic properties of conjugated linoleic acid: improved glucose tolerance, skeletal muscle insulin action, and UCP-2 gene expression,” Diabetes, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1149–1157, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Noto, P. Zahradka, N. R. Ryz, N. Yurkova, X. Xie, and C. G. Taylor, “Dietary conjugated linoleic acid preserves pancreatic function and reduces inflammatory markers in obese, insulin-resistant rats,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 142–151, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X.-R. Zhou, C.-H. Sun, J.-R. Liu, and D. Zhao, “Dietary conjugated linoleic acid increases PPARγ gene expression in adipose tissue of obese rat, and improves insulin resistance,” Growth Hormone and IGF Research, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 361–368, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Kennedy, K. Martinez, S. Schmidt, S. Mandrup, K. LaPoint, and M. McIntosh, “Antiobesity mechanisms of action of conjugated linoleic acid,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 171–179, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. D. Whigham, A. C. Watras, and D. A. Schoeller, “Efficacy of conjugated linoleic acid for reducing fat mass: a meta-analysis in humans,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 1203–1211, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. A. Watkins, Y. Li, H. E. Lippman, S. Reinwald, and M. F. Seifert, “A test of Ockham's razor: implications of conjugated linoleic acid in bone biology,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 79, supplement 6, pp. 1175S–1185S, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. Platt, L. G. Rao, and A. El-Sohemy, “Isomer-specific effects of conjugated linoleic acid on mineralized bone nodule formation from human osteoblast-like cells,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 232, no. 2, pp. 246–252, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. W. Ing and M. A. Belury, “Impact of conjugated linoleic acid on bone physiology: proposed mechanism involving inhibition of adipogenesis,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 123–131, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Purushotham, G. E. Shrode, A. A. Wendel, L.-F. Liu, and M. A. Belury, “Conjugated linoleic acid does not reduce body fat but decreases hepatic steatosis in adult Wistar rats,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 676–684, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. M. Coen, P. M. Cummins, Y. A. Birney, R. Devery, and P. A. Cahill, “Modulation of nitric oxide and 6-keto-prostaglandin F-1alpha production in bovine aortic endothelial cells by conjugated linoleic acid,” Endothelium, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 211–220, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. P. Torres-Duarte and J. Y. Vanderhoek, “Conjugated linoleic acid exhibits stimulatory and inhibitory effects on prostanoid production in human endothelial cells and platelets,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1640, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. G. Reeves, F. H. Nielsen, and G. C. Fahey Jr., “AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: Final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 1939–1951, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Folch, M. Lees, and G. H. S. Stanley, “A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 497–509, 1957. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Wirasnita, T. Hadibarata, Y. M. Novelina, A. R. M. Yusoff, and Z. Yusop, “A modified methylation method to determine fatty acid content by gas chromatography,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 3239–3242, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Bartuś, M. Łomnicka, R. B. Kostogrys et al., “1-Methylnicotinamide (MNA) prevents endothelial dysfunction in hypertriglyceridemic and diabetic rats,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 127–138, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. L. Stanhope and P. J. Havel, “Fructose consumption: potential mechanisms for its effects to increase visceral adiposity and induce dyslipidemia and insulin resistance,” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. L. Fracanzani, L. Valenti, E. Bugianesi et al., “Risk of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with normal aminotransferase levels: a role for insulin resistance and diabetes,” Hepatology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 792–798, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. S. Uslusoy, S. G. Nak, M. Gülten, and Z. Biyikli, “Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with normal aminotransferase values,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 1863–1868, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. E. Bocarsly, E. S. Powell, N. M. Avena, and B. G. Hoebel, “High-fructose corn syrup causes characteristics of obesity in rats: Increased body weight, body fat and triglyceride levels,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 101–106, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Basaranoglu, G. Basaranoglu, T. Sabuncu, and H. Sentürk, “Fructose as a key player in the development of fatty liver disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1166–1172, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. S. Collison, S. M. Saleh, R. H. Bakheet et al., “Diabetes of the liver: the link between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and HFCS-55,” Obesity (Silver Spring), vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 2003–2013, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Araya, R. Rodrigo, L. A. Videla et al., “Increase in long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid n-6/n-3 ratio in relation to hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Clinical Science, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 635–643, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. A. Videla, R. Rodrigo, J. Araya, and J. Poniachik, “Oxidative stress and depletion of hepatic long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids may contribute to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1499–1507, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Sigruener, M. E. Kleber, S. Heimerl, G. Liebisch, G. Schmitz, and W. Maerz, “Glycerophospholipid and sphingolipid species and mortality: the Ludwigshafen risk and cardiovascular health (LURIC) study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e85724, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. Staiger, H. Staiger, C. Weigert, C. Haas, H.-U. Häring, and M. Kellerer, “Saturated, but not unsaturated, fatty acids induce apoptosis of human coronary artery endothelial cells via nuclear factor-κB activation,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 3121–3126, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Kadotani, Y. Tsuchiya, H. Hatakeyama, H. Katagiri, and M. Kanzaki, “Different impacts of saturated and unsaturated free fatty acids on COX-2 expression in C2C12 myotubes,” The American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 297, no. 6, pp. E1291–E1303, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. W. Xing, L. Zhang, K. Youker et al., “Free fatty acids inhibit insulin signaling-stimulated endothelial nitric oxide synthase activation through upregulating PTEN or inhibiting Akt kinase,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 2301–2310, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. X.-Y. Xie, Z.-X. Chen, M.-X. Lei et al., “Ceramide mediates inhibition of the AKT/eNOS signaling pathway by palmitate in human vascular endothelial cells,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. BR254–BR261, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. H. B. Eccleston, K. K. Andringa, A. M. Betancourt et al., “Chronic exposure to a high-fat diet induces hepatic steatosis, impairs nitric oxide bioavailability, and modifies the mitochondrial proteome in mice,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 447–459, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Pasarín, J. G. Abraldes, A. Rodríguez-Vilarrupla, V. La Mura, J. C. García-Pagán, and J. Bosch, “Insulin resistance and liver microcirculation in a rat model of early NAFLD,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1095–1102, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. Dobrzyn and J. M. Ntambi, “The role of stearoyl-CoA desaturase in the control of metabolism,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. O. Bonetti, L. O. Lerman, and A. Lerman, “Endothelial dysfunction: a marker of atherosclerotic risk,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 168–175, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Bartuś, M. Łomnicka, B. Lorkowska et al., “Hypertriglyceridemia but not hypercholesterolemia induces endothelial dysfunction in the rat,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 57, supplement, pp. 127–137, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. S. Celermajer, “Endothelial dysfunction: does it matter? Is it reversible?” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 325–333, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. E. Stachowska, A. Siennicka, M. Baśkiewcz-Hałasa, J. Bober, B. MacHalinski, and D. Chlubek, “Conjugated linoleic acid isomers may diminish human macrophages adhesion to endothelial surface,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. V. DeClercq, C. G. Taylor, J. Wigle, B. Wright, L. Tworek, and P. Zahradka, “Conjugated linoleic acid improves blood pressure by increasing adiponectin and endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 487–493, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. O. A. Gudbrandsen, E. Rodríguez, H. Wergedahl et al., “Trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid reduces the hepatic triacylglycerol content and the leptin mRNA level in adipose tissue in obese Zucker fa/fa rats,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 803–815, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. F. Andreoli, P. G. Illesca, M. A. González, and C. A. Bernal, “Conjugated linoleic acid reduces hepatic steatosis and restores liver triacylglycerol secretion and the fatty acid profile during protein repletion in rats,” Lipids, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1035–1045, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Priore, A. M. Giudetti, F. Natali, G. V. Gnoni, and M. J. H. Geelen, “Metabolism and short-term metabolic effects of conjugated linoleic acids in rat hepatocytes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, vol. 1771, no. 10, pp. 1299–1307, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Noto, P. Zahradka, N. Yurkova et al., “Conjugated linoleic acid reduces hepatic steatosis, improves liver function, and favorably modifies lipid metabolism in obese insulin-resistant rats,” Lipids, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 179–188, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J.-L. Sébédio, E. Angioni, J. M. Chardigny, S. Grégoire, P. Juanéda, and O. Berdeaux, “The effect of conjugated linoleic acid isomers on fatty acid profiles of liver and adipose tissues and their conversion to isomers of 16:2 and 18:3 conjugated fatty acids in rats,” Lipids, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 575–582, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. Y. Choi, Y.-C. Kim, Y.-B. Han, Y. Park, M. W. Pariza, and J. M. Ntambi, “The trans-10,cis-12 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid downregulates stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 gene expression in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 130, no. 8, pp. 1920–1924, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. M. Arbonés-Mainar, M. A. Navarro, S. Acín et al., “Trans-10, cis-12- and cis-9, trans-11-conjugated linoleic acid isomers selectively modify HDL-apolipoprotein composition in apolipoprotein E knockout mice,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 353–359, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. B. De Roos, G. Rucklidge, M. Reid et al., “Divergent mechanisms of cis9, trans11-and trans10, cis12-conjugated linoleic acid affecting insulin resistance and inflammation in apolipoprotein E knockout mice: a proteomics approach,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1746–1748, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. D. M. Stringer, P. Zahradka, V. C. DeClercq et al., “Modulation of lipid droplet size and lipid droplet proteins by trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid parallels improvements in hepatic steatosis in obese, insulin-resistant rats,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, vol. 1801, no. 12, pp. 1375–1385, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. Férézou, M. Combettes-Souverain, M. Souidi et al., “Cholesterol, bile acid, and lipoprotein metabolism in two strains of hamster, one resistant, the other sensitive (LPN) to sucrose-induced cholelithiasis,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2042–2054, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. M. Peters, Y. Park, F. J. Gonzalez, and M. W. Pariza, “Influence of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition and target gene expression in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha-null mice,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, vol. 1533, no. 3, pp. 233–242, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. M. Rahman, Y.-M. Wang, H. Yotsumoto et al., “Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on serum leptin concentration, body-fat accumulation, and β-oxidation of fatty acid in OLETF rats,” Nutrition, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 385–390, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus