Bioactive Materials for Bone Tissue EngineeringView this Special Issue
Histological Comparison in Rats between Carbonate Apatite Fabricated from Gypsum and Sintered Hydroxyapatite on Bone Remodeling
Carbonate apatite (CO3Ap), the form of apatite found in bone, has recently attracted attention. The purpose of the present study was to histologically evaluate the tissue/cellular response toward the low-crystalline CO3Ap fabricated using a dissolution-precipitation reaction with set gypsum as a precursor. When set gypsum was immersed in a 100°C 1 mol/L Na3PO4 aqueous solution for 24 h, the set gypsum transformed into CO3Ap. Both CO3Ap and sintered hydroxyapatite (s-HAp), which was used as a control, were implanted into surgically created tibial bone defects of rats for histological evaluation. Two and 4 weeks after the implantation, histological sections were created and observed using light microscopy. The CO3Ap granules revealed both direct apposition of the bone matrix by osteoblasts and osteoclastic resorption. In contrast, the s-HAp granules maintained their contour even after 4 weeks following implantation which implied that there was a lack of replacement into the bone. The s-HAp granules were sometimes encapsulated with fibrous tissue, and macrophage polykaryon was occasionally observed directly apposed to the implanted granules. From the viewpoint of bone remodeling, the CO3Ap granules mimicked the bone matrix, suggesting that CO3Ap may be an appropriate bone substitute.
The golden standard for the reconstruction of bone defects is believed to be an autograft because it demonstrates osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and osteogenesis without causing any immunological response [1–4]. However, surgical intervention of the host site to harvest the bone that is required for an autograft is a serious drawback . Moreover, the amount of collectable bone is limited, particularly in the case of dental treatment. Therefore, bone defects are usually augmented using artificial bone substitutes in combination with or without an autograft.
At present, sintered hydroxyapatite [s-HAp: Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2] and sintered β-tricalcium phosphate [β-TCP: Ca3(PO4)2] are often used in dentistry. Although the inorganic component of bone mainly comprises apatite, it is not the highly crystalline form HAp but the low-crystalline carbonate form CO3Ap . s-HAp has been used in clinical applications instead of CO3Ap because CO3Ap thermally decomposes at the high temperature required for sintering. However, we propose a fabrication method of CO3Ap blocks by a compositional transformation reaction based on the dissolution-precipitation reaction using a precursor. In this reaction, a calcite block that was fabricated by exposing Ca(OH)2 compact to CO2 is immersed in a phosphate salt solution . When calcite is immersed in an aqueous solution, calcite dissolves and supplies Ca2+ and , as shown in (1). No further reaction will occur if water contains no other ions. However, if the solution contains phosphate salt, the solution is supersaturated with respect to CO3Ap. Therefore, Ca2+, , and precipitate as CO3Ap, as shown in (2).
Based on this dissolution-precipitation reaction, calcite transforms to CO3Ap, maintaining its macroscopic structure.
On the other hand, gypsum has a self-setting property. Therefore, CO3Ap in any shape can be fabricated when set gypsum is used as a precursor. The gypsum dissolves in water to supply Ca2+, as shown in
If the solution contains and , the solution is supersaturated with respect to CO3Ap; therefore, Ca2+, , and would be precipitated as CO3Ap (see (2)) that is similar to the case when calcite is used as a precursor. In the reaction, can be supplied by adding carbonate salt to the phosphate salt solution  or from the atmosphere, particularly when the phosphate salt solution is alkaline.
CO3Ap fabricated in this manner is thought to be a promising artificial bone substitute. However, few histological examinations have been conducted for CO3Ap, and no histological examination was reported for CO3Ap fabricated using set gypsum as a precursor.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the tissue response to CO3Ap fabricated from set gypsum using s-HAp as a control.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. CO3Ap Granules
B-type carbonate apatite (CO3Ap) granules were prepared using set gypsum as a precursor that is similar to the method previously described . First, set gypsum was fabricated by mixing calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·1/2H2O, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Kyoto, Japan) and distilled water at a water-to-powder ratio of 0.5. After the gypsum paste was allowed to set at room temperature for 24 h, it was crushed and sieved to obtain 200 to 400 μm granules.
Further, the gypsum granules were immersed in a 1 mol/L Na3PO4 (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) aqueous solution at 100°C for 24 h.
2.2. Sintered HAp Granules
s-HAp was fabricated by sintering commercially obtained hydroxyapatite powder (HAP200; Taihei Chemical, Osaka, Japan). HAp powder (0.2 g) was placed in a stainless steel mold and uniaxially pressed with an oil pressure press machine (Riken Power; Riken Seiki, Niigata, Japan) under 5 MPa. HAp compacts were heated in an electronic furnace at 5°C/min until 1200°C and sintered at that temperature for 4 h and then cooled inside the furnace. s-HAp was crushed and sieved to obtain 200 to 400 μm granules.
Composition and the crystallite size of the specimens were determined using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD: D8 Advance, Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. The diffraction angle was continuously scanned from 10° to 60° in 2θ at a scanning rate of 2°/min. Specific surface area of both granules was measured using Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method utilizing adsorption of nitrogen gas using a surface area analyzer (Gemini 2375, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). Furthermore, Fourier transformed infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy analysis was performed with an FT-IR spectrometer (Spectrum 2000LX; Perkin-Elmer Co. Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan), and results were recorded in the wave number range of 370–7800 cm−1. Then, the CO3 content in the apatitic structure was estimated using the method reported previously . The porosity of both materials was calculated based on the bulk density of specimens and the density of HAp and expressed as a percentage as shown in the following equation:where and are the apparent density of specimen and theoretical density of HAp (3.16 g/cm3).
Also, morphological observations of both granules were performed using scanning electron microscopy under an accelerating voltage of 15 kV (S-3400N, Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan).
2.4. Surgical Procedure
Forty-eight 8-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats (each weighing approximately 200–250 g) were used in this study. In this study, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Research Council, USA, was strictly observed and all animal experiments were conducted under the approval of the ethical committee of animal experimentation of the university (approval number: A24-221-0).
Under systemic anesthesia, the tibial bones of both legs were carefully exposed by exfoliation. After dissection of the periosteum, artificial bone cavities of 1.5 × 5.0 mm were prepared in the cortical bone of both tibiae by drilling with a round bur attached to a dental handpiece . The bone cavity was reconstructed up to the level of the previous bone surface with granules that were sterilized in an autoclave at 105°C for 60 min. The skin flap was then closed with suturing. After the surgery, buprenorphine (Lepetan, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) was injected as an analgesic.
2.5. Histological Procedure
Two and 4 weeks after implantation, the animals were euthanized and fixed with a solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer at pH 7.4. Tibial bones were carefully exposed by exfoliation and extracted and then immersed in the same fixative for 1 week at room temperature. After decalcification with Plank-Rychlo solution  for 24 h, specimens were dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol and N-butyl glycidyl ether followed by embedding in an epoxy resin (Quetol 651; Nisshin EM, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were sectioned in 1 μm thick slices using an ultramicrotome (ULTRACUT S; Reichert-Nissei, Tokyo, Japan), stained with toluidine blue, and then examined under light microscope for the detection of grafted material and new bone formation.
Figure 1 shows the SEM images of both CO3Ap and s-HAp granules. The density was somewhat higher in s-HAp granules. In case of CO3Ap granule, morphologies of needle-like gypsum crystal structure remained, which were covered with many fine granular crystals. On the surface of s-HAp granule, typical grain structure was observed. Other characteristics of both CO3Ap and s-HAp granules are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 2 summarizes the powder XRD patterns of the granules used in this study. Set gypsum granules were found to be CaSO4·2H2O (Figure 2(a)), and set gypsum immersed in Na3PO4 solution demonstrated a broad apatitic peak, indicating that it had undergone a compositional transformation from gypsum to low-crystalline apatite (Figure 2(b)). In contrast, the s-HAp granules revealed a sharp peak typical for high crystalline HAp (Figure 2(c)).
Figure 3 summarizes the FT-IR spectra of the granules used in this study. Set gypsum granules demonstrated absorption bands in three wave number regions: 1700–1600 cm−1, 1300–1000 cm−1, and 700–600 cm−1 (Figure 3(a)). The set gypsum immersed in Na3PO4 solution revealed apatitic peaks along with a carbonate peak typical for B-type carbonate apatite in which is replaced with . The CO3 content in the apatitic structure was estimated as 1.4 mass% from the FT-IR spectra. However, the s-HAp granules revealed an apatitic peak but no peaks corresponding to (Figure 3(c)).
Figure 4 summarizes the histological pictures of CO3Ap granules 2 weeks after implantation. The CO3Ap granules were almost circumscribed by the newly formed bone (Figure 4(a)). The contact between the new bone and CO3Ap was intimate and direct without any intervention of soft tissue. Direct contact of cells, probably osteoblasts and osteoclasts, was observed on some surfaces of the CO3Ap granules (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)).
Figure 5 summarizes the histological pictures of the CO3Ap granules 4 weeks following implantation. At 4 weeks, some granules were in direct contact with the new bone (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)); however, otherwise the surface of the granules was surrounded by a number of osteoclastic cells (Figure 5(c)). Direct deposition of the bone matrix onto the CO3Ap granules by osteoblasts was observed (Figure 5(b)). Consequently, the newly formed bone at the implanted area, including the CO3Ap granules, appeared to undergo normal bone remodeling.
Figure 6 summarizes the histological pictures of s-HAp 2 weeks after implantation. The s-HAp granules were surrounded by connective tissue 2 weeks after implantation (Figure 6(a)). Some multinucleated giant cells (MNCs), possibly macrophage polykaryon, were directly apposed to the s-HAp granules. These giant cells revealed a uniform stainability of cytoplasm with a number of nuclei, and their size was >50 μm. Therefore, these cells were thought to be foreign body giant cells and not osteoclasts (Figure 6(b)).
At 4 weeks following implantation, the boundary between the s-HAp granules and surrounding bone was clearly distinguishable (Figure 7(a)). The amount of new bone formed at 4 weeks after implantation was larger than that after 2 weeks. The s-HAp granules retained their original size and shape (Figure 7(b)).
No inflammatory reaction that was characterized by the migration of immunocompetent cells was observed around the implanted granules regardless of their composition. All granules demonstrated excellent tissue response.
A clear difference was observed between the CO3Ap and s-HAp granules with respect to osteoconductivity. New bone was formed around the CO3Ap granules without fibrous tissue as early as 2 weeks after implantation. Moreover, osteoblastic cells and bone matrix deposition were found on the surface of the CO3Ap granules at 2 weeks after implantation. In contrast, the s-HAp granules were surrounded by fibrous tissue at this stage. Therefore, no direct contact between osteoblasts and s-HAp was observed at this stage. Although the s-HAp granules were also bonded to the bone, these differences demonstrated that CO3Ap had higher osteoconductivity than s-HAp. These results are consistent with a previously reported cell study, although the precursor we employed is different. Nagai et al. used human bone marrow cells (hBMCs) and evaluated the effect of CO3Ap on cell response. It was demonstrated that hBMCs incubated on CO3Ap demonstrated a much higher expression of osteoblastic markers of differentiation, such as type I collagen, alkaline phosphatase, osteopontin, and osteocalcin, than hBMCs incubated on s-HAp .
Furthermore, a clear difference was observed between CO3Ap and s-HAp with respect to their resorption capability. In case of CO3Ap, MNCs with Howship’s lacunae were observed around the CO3Ap granules at all stages. The morphology of these cells was very similar to that of osteoclasts at the bone remodeling front. In contrast, for the s-HAp granules, multinucleated and extremely large cells with a dimension of >50 μm were observed at an early stage. These cells produced no resorption lacuna and their morphology was not similar to that of osteoclasts that are characterized by the abundant endosome. Instead, the cells resembled the macrophage polykaryon.
The mechanism of calcium phosphate resorption is still under debate. Dersot et al. reported that s-HAp was not resorbed by osteoclasts; however, it was resorbed by MNCs, which did not have tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity (a typical marker for osteoclasts); instead, it had a nonspecific esterase (a typical macrophage marker) . Wada et al. reported that β-TCP was not resorbed with osteoclasts; however, it was resorbed by MNCs. No ruffled border was observed, and acid phosphatase was easily inactivated by tartrate . On the contrary, several researchers reported that calcium phosphates were resorbed by osteoclasts. Baslé et al. reported that both biphasic calcium phosphate and bovine bone apatite were resorbed by osteoclasts, and bovine bone apatite was resorbed by osteoclasts . Yuasa et al. reported that low-crystalline apatite that was fabricated by setting reaction of apatite cement was resorbed by osteoclasts . It should be noted that the mechanism of calcium phosphate resorption could be different in different studies. The composition of calcium phosphates and the crystallinity are different. However, the fact that these characteristics differ may present the opportunity for a comparative study in the future.
Our s-HAp results were consistent with the findings of previous papers in that MNCs were observed around the s-HAp granules. Macrophage polykaryon is also known to create resorption pits. However, the pits tend to be very shallow and small . This implies that the extracellular degradation activity of macrophage polykaryon is relatively low. In addition, the dissolution rate of high crystalline materials, including s-HAp, is small [1, 19, 20]. Because of the lower resorption ability of macrophage polykaryon and because s-HAp has a low dissolution rate, MNCs cannot dissolve s-HAp. Therefore, the outline of s-HAp was preserved even 4 weeks after implantation.
Appearance of osteoblastic cells around the granules of β-TCP has been reported to always be followed by the resorption of the material by MNCs . In the present study, s-HAp was juxtaposed by MNCs in the early stage, and the granules were encapsulated by the new bone at the later stage. Therefore, it is possible that the juxtaposition of MNCs to s-HAp in the early stage plays a role in the subsequent bone formation.
In summary, unlike conventional s-HAp, the newly developed CO3Ap demonstrated bone-like remodeling characteristics in the bone cavity, such as osteoblastic direct bone formation and osteoclastic resorption. These traits are thought to be critical for a bone substitute material. However, the limitation of the present study is that we employed a rodent small-defect model. In an actual bone augmentation procedure, a large volume of bone graft material is applied to the desired region. In the present study, the cellular response toward the material could be clarified; however, when the material is applied in a large volume, cell penetration and/or vascularization among the graft material granules may play a critical role in the success of bone augmentation. In future studies, the actual bone augmentation capability of CO3Ap, such as in alveolar bone preservation or in large defect filling, should be elucidated.
Low-crystalline CO3Ap revealed higher osteoconductivity when compared with high crystalline s-HAp. CO3Ap granules demonstrated both resorption by osteoclastic cells and direct bone formation by osteoblastic cells, and these characteristics are similar to that of the bone. Thus, CO3Ap granules are an ideal artificial bone substitute. Further studies are required based on the results obtained in this study.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
This study was supported, in part, by the Strategic Promotion of Innovative Research and Development Program, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, and JSPS KAKENHI Grant no. 26861643. The authors thank Dr. Yunia Dwi Rakhmatia for her technical assistance.
W. R. Moore, S. E. Graves, and G. I. Bain, “Synthetic bone graft substitutes,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 354–361, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Aaboe, E. M. Pinholt, and E. Hjorting-Hansen, “Healing of experimentally created defects: a review,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 312–318, 1995.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Brekke and J. M. Toth, “Principles of tissue engineering applied to programmable osteogenesis,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 380–398, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. F. Nasr, M. E. Aichelmann-Reidy, and R. A. Yukna, “Bone and bone substitutes,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 74–86, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
B. C. Taylor, B. G. French, T. Ty Fowler, J. Russell, and A. Poka, “Induced membrane technique for reconstruction to manage bone loss,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 142–150, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Weiner and W. Traub, “Bone structure: from angstroms to microns,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 879–885, 1992.View at: Google Scholar
M. Maruta, S. Matsuya, S. Nakamura, and K. Ishikawa, “Fabrication of low-crystalline carbonate apatite foam bone replacement based on phase transformation of calcite foam,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Daitou, M. Maruta, G. Kawachi et al., “Fabrication of carbonate apatite block based on internal dissolution-precipitation reaction of dicalcium phosphate and calcium carbonate,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 303–308, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Suzuki, S. Matsuya, K.-I. Udoh et al., “Fabrication of hydroxyapatite block from gypsum block based on (NH4)2HPO4 treatment,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 515–521, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. B. Featherstone, S. Pearson, and R. Z. LeGeros, “An infrared method for quantification of carbonate in carbonated apatites,” Caries Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 63–66, 1984.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ayukawa, E. Yasukawa, Y. Moriyama et al., “Local application of statin promotes bone repair through the suppression of osteoclasts and the enhancement of osteoblasts at bone-healing sites in rats,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 336–342, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sakae, H. Mishima, Y. Kozawa, and R. Z. Legeros, “Thermal stability of mineralized and demineralized dentin: a differential scanning calorimetric study,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 33, no. 1–3, pp. 193–196, 1995.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Nagai, M. Kobayashi-Fujioka, K. Fujisawa et al., “Effects of low crystalline carbonate apatite on proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow cells,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 26, no. 2, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Dersot, M. L. Colombier, J. Lafont, B. Baroukh, D. Septier, and J. L. Saffar, “Multinucleated giant cells elicited around hydroxyapatite particles implanted in craniotomy defects are not osteoclasts,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 242, no. 2, pp. 166–176, 1995.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Wada, K. Hara, and H. Ozawa, “Ultrastructural and histochemical study of β-tricalcium phosphate resorbing cells in periodontium of dogs,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 391–401, 1989.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Baslé, D. Chappard, F. Grizon et al., “Osteoclastic resorption of Ca-P biomaterials implanted in rabbit bone,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 348–356, 1993.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yuasa, Y. Miyamoto, K. Ishikawa, M. Takechi, M. Nagayama, and K. Suzuki, “In vitro resorption of three apatite cements with osteoclasts,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 344–350, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Athanasou, J. Quinn, and C. J. K. Bulstrode, “Resorption of bone by inflammatory cells derived from the joint capsule of hip arthroplasties,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Series B, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 57–62, 1992.View at: Google Scholar
R. Z. Legeros, “Biodegradation and bioresorption of calcium phosphate ceramics,” Clinical Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 65–88, 1993.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Fulmer, I. C. Ison, C. R. Hankermayer, B. R. Constantz, and J. Ross, “Measurements of the solubilities and dissolution rates of several hydroxyapatites,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 751–755, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar