Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 596789, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/596789
Research Article

Proteomic Analysis of Estrogen-Mediated Signal Transduction in Osteoclasts Formation

1Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
2National Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology & Department of Immunology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 5 Dongdansantiao, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100005, China

Received 30 July 2014; Accepted 21 August 2014

Academic Editor: Haiteng Deng

Copyright © 2015 Qi Xiong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Estrogen plays an important role in inhibiting osteoclast differentiation and protecting against bone loss from osteoporosis, especially in postmenopausal women. However, the precise mechanisms underlying the effect of estrogen on osteoclasts are not well known. In the present study, we performed proteomics analysis and bioinformatics analysis to comprehensively compare the differential expression of proteins in receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand RANKL-induced osteoclasts in the presence and absence of estrogen. We identified 6403 proteins, of which 124 were upregulated and 231 were downregulated by estrogen. Bioinformatics analysis showed that estrogen treatment interfered with 77 intracellular pathways, including both confirmed canonical and unconfirmed pathways of osteoclast formation. Our findings validate the inhibitory effect of estrogen on osteoclasts via the promotion of apoptosis and suppression of differentiation and polarization and suggest that estrogen might inhibit osteoclast formation via other pathways, which requires further investigation and verification.

1. Introduction

Bone is a dynamic organ constantly renewed through a delicate balance between bone formation and resorption [1]. Abnormal bone resorption by osteoclasts leads to pathologically reduced bone mineral density, which is characteristic of osteolytic diseases, such as postmenopausal osteoporosis [2]. Estrogen is a key regulator of bone mass in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Estrogen deficiency in postmenopausal women frequently leads to osteoporosis, and estrogen replacement therapy is an effective means of retarding the decrease in bone density [3, 4]. Estrogen prohibits osteoclast bone resorption directly and indirectly. In direct regulation, estrogen receptors (ERs) α and β mediate most effects of estrogen. Estrogen activates ERα, but not ERβ, reducing the already short lifespan of differentiated osteoclasts through apoptosis by activating the Fas cell surface death receptor (Fas)/Fas ligand (FasL) system, and induces apoptosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner [57]. In addition, estrogen suppresses osteoclast formation by downregulating Jun N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1) and cellular-Jun (c-Jun) [8]. Moreover, estrogen decreases the expression of β3 integrin (ITGB3) and subsequently inhibits osteoclast adhesion [9]. However, the precise mechanism by which estrogen regulates osteoclasts remains unclear.

Osteoclasts are the only bone-resorbing cells derived from hematopoietic stem cells; they are induced by the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) ligand (RANKL) and undergo differentiation and fusion, resulting in large multinucleated cells [10]. RANKL and RANK interaction induces intracellular cascades that are critical for osteoclast differentiation and activation [11]. RANKL promotes osteoclast differentiation via activation of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway [12]. Downstream signaling of RANK is mediated by the recruitment of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factors (TRAFs). Of the TRAF family members, TRAF6 is crucial for RANKL-induced osteoclast formation. TRAF6 activates signaling components such as NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [10, 13]. Moreover, RANKL stimulates the phosphorylation of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), another transcription factor associated with osteoclastogenesis. RANK signaling also induces the transcription factor activator protein-1 (AP-1) by activating its component c-Fos [14]. NF-κB and c-Fos activation leads to the induction of nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 1 (NFATc1). Transcription factors such as NFATc1 and MITF form a transcription factor complex that stimulates the expression of osteoclast-specific genes such as cathepsin K (CTSK) and TRAP [15, 16]. RANKL also reduces the level of Fas expression in mature osteoclasts, thereby reducing Fas-mediated apoptosis [17].

Activation of bone resorption also involves osteoclast polarization and adhesion to the bone matrix. Osteoclasts polarize to form a tight sealing zone in which protons digest bone minerals; cathepsin K digests the organic matrix. Formation of the sealing zone requires integrin-mediated recognition of the extracellular matrix. Several studies have demonstrated that αvβ3 integrin plays a central role in osteoclast adhesion [18, 19]. Moreover, it has been suggested that ITGB3 participates in the formation of the actin ring and normal ruffled border of osteoclasts [20]. In addition to integrin, small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases), including RhoA, Rac, and Arf6 (ADP-ribosylation factor 6), are also key regulators of the formation of the sealing zone [21].

Estrogen is involved in a variety of cytokines that regulate osteoclast differentiation. Therefore, we performed proteomics analysis and bioinformatics analysis of the protein changes that occur when osteoclast precursor RAW 264.7 cells differentiate into mature osteoclasts following induction by RANKL in the presence or absence of estrogen to comprehensively investigate estrogen regulation of differentiating osteoclasts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Soluble mouse RANKL (462-TEC-010) was purchased from R&D Systems. 17β-Estradiol (E8875) and acid phosphatase leukocyte kits (387-1) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Urea (17-1319-01) was obtained from GE Healthcare. EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail was obtained from Roche. To obtain lysis buffer, 8 M urea was mixed with the protease inhibitor cocktail. The TMT 6-plex Isobaric Label Reagent Set (90061) was purchased from Thermo Scientific. Trypsin/Lys-C Mix (V5072) was purchased from Promega. The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) Protein Assay Kit was obtained from Thermo Scientific (23227). Dithiothreitol (DTT) (17131801) and indole acetic acid (IAA) (RPN6302) were obtained from GE Healthcare.

2.2. Cell Culture

RAW 264.7 cell line was obtained from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Beijing, China). Osteoclast formation was performed as previously described by Vincent et al., with minor modifications [22]. Briefly, to generate mature multinucleated osteoclasts, RAW 264.7 cells (1.5 × 105 cells/cm2) were cultured in α-minimum essential medium with fetal bovine serum in 6-well plates and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cells were divided into two groups by adding 30 ng/mL RANKL with or without 10−8 M 17β-estradiol to the culture system, and both groups were in triplicate. The culture medium was refreshed every other day. On day 5, cells were confirmed by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and harvested, and the triplicates of each group were mixed and prepared for tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling.

2.3. TRAP Staining

Mature osteoclasts were defined as TRAP-positive cells containing three or more nuclei. TRAP staining was performed using the acid phosphatase leukocyte kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4. Sample Preparation and TMT Labeling

For TMT labeling, sample preparation and labeling were performed as described by Xiong et al. [23]. Cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline three times, followed by the addition of lysis buffer. Cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation. Then, the supernatant of each group was obtained. Protein concentrations were evaluated using the BCA Protein Assay Kit. About 100 μg protein from each group was incubated in 10 mM DTT at 50°C for 1 h. Next, protein was incubated with 25 mM IAA away from light for 2 h at room temperature. Subsequently, proteins were digested with the Trypsin/Lys-C Mix at a protein/protease ratio of 25 : 1 overnight at 37°C. The TMT isobaric label reagent set was used according to the manufacturer’s manual to label proteins. Proteins extracted from cells cultured with RANKL in the presence or absence of 17β-estradiol were labeled with 0.8 mg TMT-129 or TMT-128, respectively. Equal amounts of the labeled protein digests from each group were combined for mass spectrometry (MS) analysis.

2.5. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Fractionation of the combined protein digests was performed as described previously by van Ulsen et al. [24]. Briefly, the combined TMT-labeled samples were dissolved in 100 μL 0.1% formic acid (FA) and translocated to MS tubes for HPLC (UltiMate 3000 UHPLC, Thermo Scientific). An Xbridge BEH300 C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm2, 5 μm, 300 Å, Waters) was used. Fractions were collected every 1.5 min for each of the 50 microtubes. The fractions were dried in a vacuum concentrator at 37°C and then dissolved in 20 μL 0.1% FA for further liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS analysis.

2.6. LC-MS/MS

A Q Exactive mass spectrometer was used for LC-MS/MS. Protein digests were separated by a 120 min gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.3 μL/min using an UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano System (Thermo Scientific), followed by analysis using a directly interfaced Q Exactive Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). The analytical column was a homemade fused silica capillary column (75 μm, 150 mm, Upchurch) packed with C18 resin (300 Å, 5 μm, Varian). Xcalibur 2.1.2 software was used with the Q Exactive mass spectrometer in data-dependent acquisition mode. A single full-scan mass spectrum in Orbitrap (400–1800 m/z, 60,000 resolutions) was followed by 10 data-dependent MS/MS scans at 27% normalized collision energy (HCD).

2.7. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed with the Thermo Scientific Proteome Discoverer software suite 1.3 with SEQUEST search engine and the mouse FASTA database from UniProt (released on July 9, 2014). In SEQUEST, full trypsin specificity was selected, two missed cleavages were allowed, carbamidomethylation (C) and TMT 6-plex (K and peptide N terminals) were set as the static modification, oxidation (M) was set as the dynamic modification, precursor ion mass tolerances were set at 20 ppm for all MS acquired in the Orbitrap mass analyzer, and the fragment ion mass tolerance was set at 20 mmu for all MS/MS spectra acquired. The ratio of proteins labeled with TMT-129 and TMT-128 was adjusted using the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) ratio as the internal control. The downregulation and upregulation thresholds were set at 0.8 and 1.25, respectively. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot accessions were converted into Entrez Gene IDs for subsequent analysis using the UniProt online ID mapping server. Another online analysis tool kit, bioDBnet, was used to transform the mouse gene IDs into homolog human gene IDs. The online PANTHER classification system was used to classify the proteins. The online WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt) was used to run enrichment analysis. Cytoscape 3.1.1 software and plug-ins were used to analyze the protein-protein interaction matching the WikiPathways database; significance was set at 0.0001.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of 17β-Estradiol on Osteoclast Formation

TRAP staining confirmed that RANKL efficiently induced the formation of mature osteoclasts on day 5. The number of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts in cells cultured with RANKL and 17β-estradiol was significantly less than that of cells cultured with RANKL only (Figure 1). Taken together, our data suggest that estrogen inhibits osteoclast formation in vitro.

Figure 1: Estrogen inhibits osteoclast formation. (a) RAW 264.7 cells cultured with 30 ng/mL RANKL; (b) RAW 264.7 cells cultured with 30 ng/mL RANKL and 10−8 M 17β-estradiol; (c) estrogen significantly reduced the number of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts. .
3.2. Proteomics Analysis of Proteins in Estrogen-Treated Osteoclasts

To investigate the proteins contributing to the inhibition of multinucleated mature osteoclast formation, we conducted proteomics analysis to compare the differentially expressed proteins of RANKL-induced osteoclasts in the presence or absence of 17β-estradiol. We used Proteome Discoverer to assess the LC-MS/MS raw data. We identified a total of 6403 proteins, of which 124 were upregulated in osteoclasts cultured with RANKL and 17β-estradiol compared to cells cultured with RANKL only and 231 were downregulated when cells were cultured with RANKL and 17β-estradiol. Intriguingly, we could not obtain the ratio for four proteins (UniProt accession numbers: B1ARU1, B1ARU4, F7ACR9, and Q8CAQ8-2) (see upregulated and downregulated proteins in the Supplementary Material 1 available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/596789).

3.3. Identification and Classification of Identified Proteins

To identify and classify the proteins, we first converted the UniProt accession profiles into recognizable gene IDs; we performed ID mapping using UniProt and the bioDBnet online analysis tool kit. Of the 6403 proteins identified, 5581 could be transformed into Entrez Gene IDs; 4853 mouse proteins homologous with those of humans were converted into human gene IDs. Thereafter, we classified the identified proteins using the PANTHER classification system. In total, 4450 proteins were matched to the total proteins in the PANTHER database, all of which were grouped into 29 subgroups, and the proteins identified were matched to 6442 biological processes in 13 categories. We also assessed the molecular functions of the identified proteins and identified 4464 molecular functions in 10 categories matched, where the proteins were mostly involved in catalytic activity and binding (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Classification of the identified proteins with PANNTHER. (a) Protein class hit against total PANTHER protein class. (b) Molecular function hit against total GO molecular function. (c) Biological process hit against total GO biological process.
3.4. Bioinformatics Analysis of Identified Proteins

To evaluate the effects of 17β-estradiol on RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation, we performed bioinformatics analysis using WebGestalt and Cytoscape. WebGestalt was used to conduct enrichment analysis based on the WikiPathways database: 2770 of the 6403 proteins participating in 77 pathways were mapped with high confidence; of these, we found pathways confirmed as being involved in osteoclast differentiation, including pathways for TNF-α/NF-κB signaling, focal adhesion, estrogen signaling, apoptosis, MAPK cascade, senescence, autophagy, FAS, stress induction of heat shock protein (HSP) regulation, and the osteoclast signaling. Moreover, we identified pathways that have not been verified as being associated with osteoclasts to date, including the pathways for Delta-Notch signaling, urea cycle, and metabolism of amino groups (Figures 38). Next, we used Cytoscape to analyze the differentially expressed proteins in osteoclasts cultured with 17β-estradiol and RANKL compared to osteoclasts cultured with only RANKL in the pathways identified using WebGestalt. The proteins were mapped to WikiPathways, and we observed that protein expression was altered in a variety of pathways. In the osteoclast signaling pathway, it was apparent that the hallmarks of osteoclast differentiation, such as TRAP, cathepsin K, and RANK, were downregulated in an obvious manner in cells cultured with RANKL and 17β-estradiol. These findings indicate that osteoclast differentiation was inhibited. However, we found that H+-ATPase was slightly upregulated, indicating more bone resorption (Figure 3). Furthermore, we observed in the TNF-α/NF-κB signaling pathway that TNF receptor superfamily, member 11a, NF-κB activator (TNFRSF11A or RANK), downstream of which was Traf6, was downregulated by 17β-estradiol (Figure 4). In addition, we screened the Fas and apoptosis pathways and found that caspase-3 (CASP3), which promotes apoptosis, was upregulated (Figure 5). CASP3 was also upregulated in the MAPK pathway, a known pathway essential for osteoclasts (Figure 6). Furthermore, we assessed the pathway associated with osteoclast polarization, finding that RhoA was obviously upregulated (Figure 7). Moreover, we were surprised to find that Jun was downregulated in almost all of the above-mentioned pathways. Taken together, our results suggest that 17β-estradiol promotes osteoclast apoptosis and inhibits osteoclast differentiation and polarization; however, our results demonstrate that 17β-estradiol induces osteoclast bone resorption slightly.

Figure 3: Estrogen regulates osteoclasts signaling pathway of osteoclasts. Grey boxes indicate proteins not identified in our study; green boxes indicate downregulated proteins; red boxes indicate upregulated proteins.
Figure 4: Estrogen regulates TNF-α NF-κB signaling pathway of osteoclasts. Grey boxes indicate proteins not identified in our study; green boxes indicate downregulated proteins; red boxes indicate upregulated proteins.
Figure 5: Estrogen regulates apoptosis signaling pathway of osteoclasts. Grey boxes indicate proteins not identified in our study; green boxes indicate downregulated proteins; red boxes indicate upregulated proteins.
Figure 6: Estrogen regulates MAPK signaling pathway of osteoclasts. Grey boxes indicate proteins not identified in our study; green boxes indicate downregulated proteins; red boxes indicate upregulated proteins.
Figure 7: Estrogen regulates cell adhesion and polarization signaling pathway of osteoclasts. Grey boxes indicate proteins not identified in our study; green boxes indicate downregulated proteins; red boxes indicate upregulated proteins.
Figure 8: Estrogen regulates Delta-Notch signaling pathway of osteoclasts. Grey boxes indicate proteins not identified in our study; green boxes indicate downregulated proteins; red boxes indicate upregulated proteins.

4. Discussion

In this study, we used proteomics analysis to comprehensively screen differentially expressed proteins and bioinformatics analysis to thoroughly evaluate the pathways and biological processes in RANKL-induced osteoclast formation in the presence or absence of 17β-estradiol. Consistent with previous studies [25, 26], our findings indicate that estrogen significantly inhibits TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts. We identified 6403 proteins in 29 categories in the osteoclasts, of which 124 were upregulated and 231 were downregulated by estrogen stimulation. All identified proteins are involved in 77 signaling pathways in 13 biological processes. Estrogen probably prohibited the formation of mature osteoclasts by interfering with these intracellular signals. Our results provide comprehensive verification and identification of the effects of estrogen on osteoclasts.

The OPG/RANKL/RANK signaling pathway is a fundamental regulatory system for osteoclastogenesis. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate whether estrogen inhibits osteoclast formation through this pathway. Palacios et al. demonstrated that estrogen directly binds with ERα, a membrane receptor expressed on osteoclast precursors, and decreases the formation of TRAP-expressing osteoclasts [27]. Cathepsin K plays critical roles in osteoclast bone resorption; Shi et al. reported that cathepsin K was increased in an animal model of postmenopausal osteoporosis [28]. In our study, we determined that RANK, TRAP, and cathepsin K were downregulated in an obvious manner in the osteoclast pathway via WikiPathways database matching. Our findings confirmed estrogen inhibition of osteoclast formation at the molecular level. However, our results showed that H+-ATPase expression was increased when osteoclasts were treated with estrogen. H+-ATPase is required in proton secretion by the ruffled border of activated osteoclasts to maintain a low-pH microenvironment of the resorption lacunae and mediates bone resorption [29]. Thus, estrogen might somehow enhance osteoclast bone resorption, though the mechanisms have not been elucidated. Taken together, these results strongly support the premise that estrogen reduces the formation of mature osteoclasts by regulating the osteoclast signaling pathways.

As the downstream signaling molecules of RANK include NF-κB and TRAF6 [3032], we compared their differential expression in the NF-κB pathway between osteoclasts cultured with and without estrogen. In the TNF-α/NF-κB signaling pathway mapped in the WikiPathways database, estrogen decreased the expression of membrane receptor TNFRSF11A. As expected, we did not detect TRAF6, a downstream molecule of TNFRSF11A. Considering the fact TRAF6 initiates the NF-κB signaling cascade, and TRAF6 deficiency results in reduced osteoclast differentiation or function, we believe that estrogen inhibition of osteoclast formation is partially attributed to downregulation of the NF-κB pathway.

Previous studies have reported that estrogen promotes osteoclast apoptosis. Saintier et al. demonstrated that estrogen induced nuclear condensation and increased Bax, CASP3, and CASP9 protein expression without altering BCL2 protein expression and FASL and FAS mRNA expression in osteoclasts, eventually inducing osteoclast apoptosis [33]. However, Nakamura et al. showed that estrogen induced osteoclast apoptosis by upregulating FasL expression [5]. Consistent with Saintier et al., we did not observe changes in BCL2 expression in osteoclasts cultured with estrogen, whereas Jun was downregulated in the upstream region of the antiapoptotic gene. Moreover, similar to Nakamura et al., we found that estrogen upregulated the Fas pathway; molecules downstream the pathway, that is, FAF1 (Fas-associated factor 1) and CASP3, both of which initiate apoptosis, were increased. To confirm the induction of apoptosis by estrogen, we matched our results with the apoptosis pathway in the WikiPathways database. As expected, proapoptotic proteins such as Bax, CASP3, and CASP9 were upregulated. In view of these findings, estrogen inhibits osteoclast formation by inducing apoptosis and reducing osteoclast lifespan.

Osteoclast bone resorption requires polarization, which is reorganization of the cytoskeleton and the formation of the actin-rich sealing zone [21]. In osteoclasts, these processes depend on vitronectin, ITGB3, and small GTPases, including RhoA, Rac, and Cdc43 [21, 34]. Zhang et al. reported that RhoA inhibition disrupted sealing zone formation and inhibited osteoclast formation [35]. Furthermore, other researchers have suggested that RhoA affects only the sealing zone, but not actin belt formation [36]. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to suggest that estrogen affects RhoA and Rac expression in osteoclast formation. In the focal adhesion pathway, we found that RhoA, Rac1, and Rac2 were downregulated. Previous studies have indicated that RhoA alone was not sufficient to induce sealing zone formation [37, 38]. ITGB3 also plays an important role in regulating osteoclast function. Inhibition of ITGB3 in vitro decreased the ability of osteoclasts to bind and degrade bone and promoted osteoclast apoptosis [18, 39, 40]. There is evidence that estrogen reduces ITGB3 expression in differentiating and mature osteoclasts in humans and mice and inhibits osteoclast adhesion [9, 33]. To confirm the effect of estrogen on integrin-mediated osteoclast adhesion, we further analyzed the differential expression of proteins in the integrin-mediated cell adhesion pathway. We found that ITGB1–3, ITGB7, ITGA5, and ITGAX were downregulated by estrogen. Therefore, our findings suggest that osteoclast adhesion capacity is decreased in the presence of estrogen through GTPase and integrin.

In addition to the verified pathways related to osteoclast formation, we determined that estrogen might interfere with other osteoclast signaling pathways, including the pathways for Delta-Notch signaling, urea cycle, and amino group metabolism, where Delta-Notch signaling plays a crucial role in cell-cell communication and cell fate decisions and coordinates with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways in upstream activating stimulus for angiogenesis [41]. Early studies have suggested that osteoclasts stimulate angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo [42, 43]. To our knowledge, however, whether Delta-Notch signaling participates in osteoclast formation has never been reported. In the present study, we observed that a variety of proteins were differentially expressed in the Delta-Notch signaling pathway: estrogen increased Notch2 and RelA while reducing ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 (ADAM10). Although the pathways identified in this study require confirmation, our findings shed new light on the mechanisms of estrogen regulation of osteoclasts.

In conclusion, estrogen inhibits osteoclast formation by regulating the cell differentiation, apoptosis, adhesion, and other pathways. Additionally, estrogen might be involved in interference with other intracellular or intercellular pathways, although their precise mechanisms require future validation. Our results also shed new light on the development of more efficient therapeutic approaches for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Qi Xiong and Peifu Tang have contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

Qi Xiong, Peifu Tang, and Lihai Zhang are supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31370947). Wei Ge and Yanpan Gao are supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81373150).

References

  1. S. C. Manolagas, “Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 115–137, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. F. Eriksen, “Cellular mechanisms of bone remodeling,” Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 219–227, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. C. Manolagas, S. Kousteni, and R. L. Jilka, “Sex steroids and bone,” Recent Progress in Hormone Research, vol. 57, pp. 385–409, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Syed and S. Khosla, “Mechanisms of sex steroid effects on bone,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 328, no. 3, pp. 688–696, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Nakamura, Y. Imai, T. Matsumoto et al., “Estrogen prevents bone loss via estrogen receptor alpha and induction of Fas ligand in osteoclasts,” Cell, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 811–823, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Mano, Y. Hakeda, and M. Kumegawa, “Estrogen directly down-regulates the bone-resorbing activity of mature osteoclasts through nuclear estrogen receptor α,” Cytotechnology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Kameda, H. Mano, T. Yuasa et al., “Estrogen inhibits bone resorption by directly inducing apoptosis of the bone-resorbing osteoclasts,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 489–495, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. K. Shevde, A. C. Bendixen, K. M. Dienger, and J. W. Pike, “Estrogens suppress RANK ligand-induced osteoclast differentiation via a stromal cell independent mechanism involving c-Jun repression,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 14, pp. 7829–7834, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Saintier, M.-A. Burde, J. M. Rey, T. Maudelonde, M. C. de Vernejoul, and M. E. Cohen-Solal, “17β-estradiol downregulates β3-integrin expression in differentiating and mature human osteoclasts,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 269–276, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. F. Boyce, “Advances in osteoclast biology reveal potential new drug targets and new roles for osteoclasts,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 711–722, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Takayanagi, “Osteoimmunology: shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 292–304, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. J. Boyle, W. S. Simonet, and D. L. Lacey, “Osteoclast differentiation and activation,” Nature, vol. 423, no. 6937, pp. 337–342, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Kobayashi, Y. Kadono, A. Naito et al., “Segregation of TRAF6-mediated signaling pathways clarifies its role in osteoclastogenesis,” EMBO Journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1271–1280, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. F. Wagner and R. Eferl, “Fos/AP-1 proteins in bone and the immune system,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 208, pp. 126–140, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Hu, S. M. Sharma, A. Bronisz, R. Srinivasan, U. Sankar, and M. C. Ostrowski, “Eos, MITF, and PU.1 recruit corepressors to osteoclast-specific genes in committed myeloid progenitors,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 4018–4027, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Negishi-Koga and H. Takayanagi, “Ca2+-NFATc1 signaling is an essential axis of osteoclast differentiation,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 231, no. 1, pp. 241–256, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. Wu, G. Pan, M. A. McKenna, M. Zayzafoon, W.-C. Xiong, and J. M. McDonald, “RANKL regulates Fas expression and Fas-mediated apoptosis in osteoclasts,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 107–116, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. I. Nakamura, L. T. Duong, S. B. Rodan, and G. A. Rodan, “Involvement of αvβ3 integrins in osteoclast function,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 337–344, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. Zou and S. L. Teitelbaum, “Integrins, growth factors, and the osteoclast cytoskeleton,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1192, pp. 27–31, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. P. McHugh, K. Hodivala-Dilke, M.-H. Zheng et al., “Mice lacking β3 integrins are osteosclerotic because of dysfunctional osteoclasts,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 433–440, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Itzstein, F. P. Coxon, and M. J. Rogers, “The regulation of osteoclast function and bone resorption by small GTPases,” Small GTPases, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 117–130, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Vincent, M. Kogawa, D. M. Findlay, and G. J. Atkins, “The generation of osteoclasts from RAW 264.7 precursors in defined, serum-free conditions,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 114–119, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Xiong, A. Darwanto, S. Sharma et al., “Mass spectrometric studies on epigenetic interaction networks in cell differentiation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 15, pp. 13657–13668, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. van Ulsen Karsten Kuhn, T. Prinz, H. Legner, P. Schmid, C. Baumann, and J. Tommassen, “Identification of proteins of Neisseria meningitidis induced under iron-limiting conditions using the isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling approach,” Proteomics, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1771–1781, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Chen, Y. Ouyang, T. Ye, B. Ni, and A. Chen, “Estrogen inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastic differentiation by increasing the expression of TRPV5 channel,” The Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 651–658, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Srivastava, G. Toraldo, M. N. Weitzmann, S. Cenci, F. P. Ross, and R. Pacifici, “Estrogen decreases osteoclast formation by down-regulating receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-induced JNK activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 12, pp. 8836–8840, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. V. G. Palacios, L. J. Robinson, C. W. Borysenko, T. Lehmann, S. E. Kalla, and H. C. Blair, “Negative regulation of RANKL-induced osteoclastic differentiation in RAW264.7 cells by estrogen and phytoestrogens,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 14, pp. 13720–13727, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. X. L. Shi, C. W. Li, Q. Z. Wan, A. Q. Li, H. Wang, and K. Liu, “Drynaria total flavonoids decrease cathepsin K expression in ovariectomized rats,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 4311–4319, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  29. H. C. Blair, S. L. Teitelbaum, R. Ghiselli, and S. Gluck, “Osteoclastic bone resorption by a polarized vacuolar proton pump,” Science, vol. 245, no. 4920, pp. 855–857, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. E. Kearns, S. Khosla, and P. J. Kostenuik, “Receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand and osteoprotegerin regulation of bone remodeling in health and disease,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 155–192, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Z. H. Lee and H.-H. Kim, “Signal transduction by receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B in osteoclasts,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 305, no. 2, pp. 211–214, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. L. Burgess, Y.-X. Qian, S. Kaufman et al., “The ligand for osteoprotegerin (OPGL) directly activates mature osteoclasts,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 527–538, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. Saintier, V. Khanine, B. Uzan, H. K. Ea, M. C. de Vernejoul, and M. E. Cohen-Solal, “Estradiol inhibits adhesion and promotes apoptosis in murine osteoclasts in vitro,” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 99, no. 4-5, pp. 165–173, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. J. Chambers and K. Fuller, “How are osteoclasts induced to resorb bone?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1240, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Zhang, N. Udagawa, I. Nakamura et al., “The small GTP-binding protein, rho p21, is involved in bone resorption by regulating cytoskeletal organization in osteoclasts,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 108, part 6, pp. 2285–2292, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Saltel, O. Destaing, F. Bard, D. Eichert, and P. Jurdic, “Apatite-mediated actin dynamics in resorbing osteoclasts,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 5231–5241, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Ory, Y. Munari-Silem, P. Fort, and P. Jurdic, “Rho and Rac exert antagonistic functions on spreading of macrophage-derived multinucleated cells and are not required for actin fiber formation,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 113, part 7, pp. 1177–1188, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. A. Chellaiah, N. Soga, S. Swanson et al., “Rho-A is critical for osteoclast podosome organization, motility, and bone resorption,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 16, pp. 11993–12002, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. V. W. Engleman, G. A. Nickols, F. P. Ross et al., “A peptidomimetic antagonist of the αvβ3 integrin inhibits bone resorption in vitro and prevents osteoporosis in vivo,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 2284–2292, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. Zhao, F. P. Ross, and S. L. Teitelbaum, “Unoccupied αvβ3 integrin regulates osteoclast apoptosis by transmitting a positive death signal,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 771–780, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. Thurston and J. Kitajewski, “VEGF and Delta-Notch: interacting signalling pathways in tumour angiogenesis,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 1204–1209, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Y. Tanaka, M. Abe, M. Hiasa et al., “Myeloma cell-osteoclast interaction enhances angiogenesis together with bone resorption: a role for vascular endothelial cell growth factor and osteopontin,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 816–823, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. F. C. Cackowski, J. L. Anderson, K. D. Patrene et al., “Osteoclasts are important for bone angiogenesis,” Blood, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 140–149, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus