Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 852070, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/852070
Research Article

Spatially Enhanced Differential RNA Methylation Analysis from Affinity-Based Sequencing Data with Hidden Markov Model

1Key Laboratory of Information Fusion Technology of Ministry of Education, School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
2School of Information and Electrical Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
4XJTLU-WTNC Research Institute, Department of Biological Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China

Received 12 February 2015; Accepted 25 March 2015

Academic Editor: Fang-Xiang Wu

Copyright © 2015 Yu-Chen Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. G. Brownlee, F. Sanger, and B. G. Barrell, “Nucleotide sequence of 5S-ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli,” Nature, vol. 215, no. 5102, pp. 735–736, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Fu, D. Dominissini, G. Rechavi, and C. He, “Gene expression regulation mediated through reversible m6A RNA methylation,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 293–306, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. D. Meyer and S. R. Jaffrey, “The dynamic epitranscriptome: N6-methyladenosine and gene expression control,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 313–326, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. König, K. Zarnack, N. M. Luscombe, and J. Ule, “Protein-RNA interactions: new genomic technologies and perspectives,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 77–83, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Dominissini, S. Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S. Schwartz et al., “Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq,” Nature, vol. 484, no. 7397, pp. 201–206, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. D. Meyer, Y. Saletore, P. Zumbo, O. Elemento, C. E. Mason, and S. R. Jaffrey, “Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons,” Cell, vol. 149, no. 7, pp. 1635–1646, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Dominissini, S. Moshitch-Moshkovitz, M. Salmon-Divon, N. Amariglio, and G. Rechavi, “Transcriptome-wide mapping of N6-methyladenosine by m6A-seq based on immunocapturing and massively parallel sequencing,” Nature Protocols, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 176–189, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. M. Fustin, M. Doi, Y. Yamaguchi et al., “XRNA-methylation-dependent RNA processing controls the speed of the circadian clock,” Cell, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 793–806, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. E. Hess, S. Hess, K. D. Meyer et al., “The fat mass and obesity associated gene (Fto) regulates activity of the dopaminergic midbrain circuitry,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1042–1048, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Wang, Y. Li, J. I. Toth, M. D. Petroski, Z. Zhang, and J. C. Zhao, “N6 -methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 191–198, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Lee, B. Kim, and V. N. Kim, “Emerging roles of RNA modification: m(6)A and U-tail,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 980–987, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Schwartz, M. R. Mumbach, M. Jovanovic et al., “Perturbation of m6A writers reveals two distinct classes of mRNA methylation at internal and 5′ sites,” Cell Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 284–296, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Liu, Y. Yue, D. Han et al., “A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation,” Nature chemical biology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 93–95, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Wang, Z. Lu, A. Gomez et al., “N 6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability,” Nature, vol. 505, no. 7481, pp. 117–120, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. He, “Grand Challenge Commentary: RNA epigenetics?” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 863–865, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Dominissini, “Roadmap to the epitranscriptome,” Science, vol. 346, no. 6214, pp. 1192–1192, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Liu, M. A. Flores, J. Meng et al., “MeT-DB: a database of transcriptome methylation in mammalian cells,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. D197–D203, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang et al., “Decomposition of RNA methylome reveals co-methylation patterns induced by latent enzymatic regulators of the epitranscriptome,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 262–274, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. J. Meng, X. Cui, M. K. Rao, Y. Chen, and Y. Huang, “Exome-based analysis for RNA epigenome sequencing data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1565–1567, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Li, S. Song, C. Li, and J. Yu, “MeRIP-PF: an Easy-to-use Pipeline for High-resolution Peak-finding in MeRIP-Seq Data,” Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 72–75, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Meng, Z. Lu, H. Liu et al., “A protocol for RNA methylation differential analysis with MeRIP-Seq data and exomePeak R/Bioconductor package,” Methods, vol. 69, pp. 274–281, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  22. C. Bock, “Analysing and interpreting DNA methylation data,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 705–719, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. D. Robinson, A. Kahraman, C. W. Law et al., “Statistical methods for detecting differentially methylated loci and regions,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 5, article 324, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. D. Sun, Y. Xi, B. Rodriguez et al., “MOABS: model based analysis of bisulfite sequencing data,” Genome Biology, vol. 15, article R38, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. A. Stockwell, A. Chatterjee, E. J. Rodger, and I. M. Morison, “DMAP: differential methylation analysis package for RRBS and WGBS data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 1814–1822, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Meng, X. Cui, H. Liu et al., “Unveiling the dynamics in RNA epigenetic regulations,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM '13), pp. 139–144, Shanghai, China, December 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. Y. Zhang, T. Liu, C. A. Meyer et al., “Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS),” Genome Biology, vol. 9, article R137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Seifert, S. Cortijo, M. Colomé-Tatché, F. Johannes, F. Roudier, and V. Colot, “MeDIP-HMM: genome-wide identification of distinct DNA methylation states from high-density tiling arrays,” Bioinformatics, vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 2930–2939, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Seifert, J. Keilwagen, M. Strickert, and I. Grosse, “Utilizing gene pair orientations for HMM-based analysis of promoter array ChIP-chip data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 2118–2125, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Xu, C.-L. Wei, F. Lin, and W.-K. Sung, “An HMM approach to genome-wide identification of differential histone modification sites from ChIP-seq data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 2344–2349, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Krishnamoorthy and J. Thomson, “A more powerful test for comparing two Poisson means,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. J. Przyborowski and H. Wilenski, “Homogeneity of results in testing samples from Poisson series with an application to testing clover seed for dodder,” Biometrika, vol. 31, pp. 313–323, 1940. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. C. Becker, J. Hagmann, J. Müller et al., “Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome,” Nature, vol. 480, no. 7376, pp. 245–249, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Y. Li, J. Zhu, G. Tian et al., “The DNA methylome of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells,” PLoS Biology, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e1000533, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. R. Lister, M. Pelizzola, R. H. Dowen et al., “Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences,” Nature, vol. 462, no. 7271, pp. 315–322, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. Lister, M. Pelizzola, Y. S. Kida et al., “Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells,” Nature, vol. 471, no. 7336, pp. 68–73, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Baldi and Y. Chauvin, “Smooth on-line learning algorithms for hidden Markov models,” Neural Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 307–318, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin, “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Methodological, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  39. A. Poritz, “Hidden Markov models: a guided tour,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '88), vol. 1, pp. 7–13, New York, NY, USA, April 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. X. Wang, Z. Lu, A. Gomez et al., “N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability,” Nature, vol. 505, no. 7481, pp. 117–120, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. X.-L. Ping, B.-F. Sun, L. Wang et al., “Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase,” Cell Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 177–189, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. Kim, G. Pertea, C. Trapnell, H. Pimentel, R. Kelley, and S. L. Salzberg, “TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions,” Genome Biology, vol. 14, article R36, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. Karolchik, G. P. Barber, J. Casper et al., “The UCSC genome browser database: 2014 update,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. D764–D770, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus