BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 2483258 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2483258

Ming Li, Zhaoxu Liang, Cuixia Di, Weikuan Fang, Kaichao Wu, Maoshan Chen, Shanshan He, Yuan Zeng, Yan Jing, Jun Liang, Fang Tan, Song Li, Tuo Chen, Guangxiu Liu, Lizhe An, "Molecular Characterization of LRB7 Gene and a Water Channel Protein TIP2 in Chorispora bungeana", BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 2483258, 11 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2483258

Molecular Characterization of LRB7 Gene and a Water Channel Protein TIP2 in Chorispora bungeana

Academic Editor: Byoung R. Jeong
Received05 Feb 2016
Accepted20 Apr 2016
Published01 Sep 2016

Abstract

Background. Water channel proteins, also called aquaporins, are integral membrane proteins from major intrinsic protein (MIP) family and involved in several pathways including not only water transport but also cell signaling, reproduction, and photosynthesis. The full cDNA and protein sequences of aquaporin in Chorispora bungeana Fisch. & C.A. Mey (C. bungeana) are still unknown. Results. In this study, PCR and rapid amplification of cDNA ends approaches were used to clone the full cDNA of LRB7 (GenBank accession number: EU636988) of C. bungeana. Sequence analysis indicated that it was 1235 bp, which had two introns and encoded a protein of 250 amino acids. Structure analysis revealed that the protein had two conserved NPA motifs, one of which is MIP signature sequence (SGxHxNPAVT), six membrane helix regions, and additional membrane-embedded domains. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that the protein was from TIP2 subgroup. Surprisingly, semiquantitative RT-PCR experiment and western blot analysis showed that LRB7 and TIP2 were only detectable in roots, unlike Arabidopsis and Raphanus. Connecting with our previous studies, LRB7 was supported to associate with chilling-tolerance in C. bungeana. Conclusion. This is the first time to characterize the full sequences of LRB7 gene and water channel protein in C. bungeana. Our findings contribute to understanding the water transports in plants under low temperatures.

1. Introduction

Water channel proteins (aquaporins) are integral membrane proteins from a large family of major intrinsic protein (MIP) [1]. The discovery of first water channel protein (AQP1) in human erythrocytes explained the high water permeability of red blood cells and renal tubular epithelial cells [2]. Since the first plant-related water channel protein was found in Arabidopsis thaliana called γ-tonoplast intrinsic protein (γ-TIP, TIP1) [3], hundreds of water channel proteins have been identified in kinds of organisms including bacterial, animals, plants, and human [47]. In plants, aquaporins were classified into five subgroups including plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) [8], tonoplast intrinsic protein (TIP) [9], nodulin-26 like intrinsic protein (NIP) [10], small basic intrinsic protein (SIP) [11], and X intrinsic protein (XIP) [12]. The structure of aquaporins is highly conserved, containing six transmembrane helices and two additional membrane-embedded domains linked by five loops, with the C- and N-terminals which are located on the cytoplasmic surface of the membrane [13, 14]. Aquaporins have been reported to be involved in root water transport, cell signaling, reproduction, and photosynthesis [15, 16].

Chorispora bungeana Fisch. and C.A. Mey. (Chorispora bungeana, C. bungeana) is an alpine perennial herb belonging to the Brassicaceae family. It grows in the freezing and thawing tundra in the borders of glaciers, subalpine meadow, and gravel. Some studies of this model plant have investigated mainly cold-tolerance [1719]; however, the mechanism of water transport in freezing environment is asking for more experiments and evidence. In Arabidopsis and Raphanus, aquaporins have been characterized with high expression in young shoot, rosette, and flower tissues and other tissues [20, 21]. In this study, we first isolated the LRB7 cDNA sequence encoding an aquaporin in the root of C. bungeana. In addition, the encoding aquaporin was characterized as δ-TIP, also called TIP2 [22]. We further found LRB7 and its protein product TIP2 probably detectable only in the root tissue, not in the stems or leaves of C. bungeana.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

The wild species of C. bungeana were grown in the source area of Urumqi River in Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China (43°05′ N, 86°49′ E, with an altitude of 3,800–3,900 m), and transplanted to the experimental field of botanical garden at Lanzhou University. After one year, leaves, stems, and young roots were collected from three individual plants during their growth period (from June to September) and stored in liquid nitrogen.

2.2. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was isolated according to the method described by Doyle and Dickson [23]. Young root samples (200 mg) were grinded in mortar and pestle in 10 mL of 2 × CTAB isolation buffer (2 × CTAB = 2% hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, and 0.2% 2-mercaptoethanol). Then the CTAB/plant extract mixture was incubated at 60°C for 1 hr in a recirculating water bath and centrifuged at 12000 ×g for 5 min to remove cell debris. The supernatant was transferred to a clean microfuge tube, added in 250 µL of chloroform : isoamyl alcohol (24 : 1), mixed by inversion, and centrifuged at 13000 RPM for 1 min. The supernatant (contains the DNA) was next moved to a clean tube and added 50 µL of 7.5 M ammonium acetate followed by 500 µL of ice-cold absolute ethanol. To precipitate the DNA, invert the tubes slowly several times and incubate the tubes at −20°C for 1 hr. After precipitation, samples were centrifuged at 7000 RPM for 1-2 min to concentrate the DNA. The pellet was then washed by 20 mL of wash buffer (70% ethanol and 10 mM ammonium acetate): following an initial gentle swirling of the tube to break up the pellet, samples were left at room temperature for 20 min. The DNAs were then centrifuged at 13000 RPM in for 5 min, air-dry the pellets (~30 min), were resuspended in 1 mL TE (10 mM Tris-HC1, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4), and were incubated in RNase A solution (10 µg, Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 37°C. The solution was made 2.5 M in ammonium acetate and 2.5 volumes of cold ethanol were added to precipitate DNA. The DNA pellet was then air-dried again on a desktop overnight and resuspended in 1 mL TE. The quality of DNA was evaluated and controlled by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific).

2.3. Total RNA Isolation

Total RNA was isolated using Trizol® reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacture’s instruction. Briefly, a total of 200 mg plant samples (young roots, leaves, and stem samples) were incubated in 2 mL Trizol reagent at room temperature for 5 min. After transferring the mixture into clean tubes and adding 0.4 mL of chloroform, the samples were homogenized by shaking the tubes for 15 sec, incubated for 3 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 15 min at 4°C. The aqueous phase was transferred into new tubes. RNase-free glycogen (5 µg) was added in as carriers, followed by 1 mL of 100% isopropanol. Next, the samples were incubated at room temperature for 10 min and centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C. The RNA pellet was washed by using 2 mL of 75% ethanol, vortex briefly, and centrifugation at 7500 ×g for 5 min at 4°C. The RNA pellet was air-dried, suspended in RNase-free water, water-bathed at 57°C for 10 min, and stored at −80°C. RNA quality was evaluated by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Young roots, stems, and leaves were used for RNA isolation separately.

2.4. RT-PCR

To confirm the full sequence of LRB7 gene, PCR amplification was performed using primers shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Total RNA (2 µg) was used for cDNA synthesis with One Step RNA PCR Kit (Takara Bio) and AMV Reverse Transcriptase XL (Takara Bio), according to the protocols. The reaction mixture contained 1.25 U of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio), 2.5 μL of 10x buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 500 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2), 2.5 mM of each dNTP, and 0.4 μM of each primer. PCR amplifications were performed at 94°C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles of amplification (94°C for 30 s, 59°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s) and a final elongation at 72°C for 5 min.


PrimersFrom 5′ to 3′Denote

P1TTGCTGGDGTTGGGTCHGCFor the first fragment of LRB7 cDNA
P2TCCGCGGCYGTKGCRTAAACIFor the first fragment of LRB7 cDNA
P3CGCTTTGGTCTACACCGTCTAFor the second fragment of LRB7 cDNA
P4TCGGAAGAACMCAYGAASACATFor the second fragment of LRB7 cDNA
P5GCGGAATTCATGGCAGGAGTAGCCTTCGGTFor the genomic region of LRB7
P6GCGAAGCTTGAAATCAGAAGAA GCAAGAGGFor the genomic region of LRB7
P7GGAGCTGAGAGATTCCGTTGCFor the actins gene
P8GAAG CATTTCCTGTGGACAATCGAFor the actins gene
P9ATCTTCTTCATTAAACAAAAACSemiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of LRB7
P10GTAAACGGTGTAGACCAAASemiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of LRB7
5′ GSP1GAGATGTTGGCTCCGATTGCGACFor the 5′ RACE of LRB7
5′ GSP2CTAGTCCGGGCGTGTCAAGAGCAFor the 5′ RACE of LRB7
3′ GSP3TCACTGGGTCTACTGGGTGGGTCFor the 3′ RACE of LRB7
3′ GSP4TGCCGGAGCTGTTTATGGCAATGFor the 3′ RACE of LRB7

2.5. 5′ and 3′ RACE Experiment and DNA Sequencing

The reactions of Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE) were performed using GeneRacer RACE Ready cDNA Kit (Invitrogen) strictly following the manufacturer’s instructions. The amplified fragments were then transferred into the pMD18-T vector (Takara Bio), nucleotide sequences were determined with CEQ 2000XLDNA Analyzer (Beckman Coulter), and the data were analyzed and visualized by using Sequencer (Genes Codes Corporation). Three independent clones of each amplification product were sequenced to avoid errors caused by PCR. The primers used for this experiment can be found in Table 1.

2.6. Semiquantitative RT-PCR

To analyze the tissue specificity of LRB7 at transcriptional level in C. bungeana, semiquantitative RT-PCR experiments were conducted using the RNA samples isolated from roots, stems, and leaves, respectively. Briefly, total RNA (2 µg) was used for cDNA synthesis, as described. Primers P7/P8 and P9/P10 (Table 1) were designed for the housekeeping actin gene (GenBank accession number AY825362) and LRB7 gene determined in this study. PCR amplifications were performed following the process: 25 cycles (94°C for 5 min), 30 cycles (94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 30 s), and a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were separated and purified using 1% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide and analyzed by Gene Tools software (Gene Company Ltd.).

2.7. Preparation of Antibodies for LRB7 Encoded Protein (Anti-LRB7)

pGEX-4T-3-LRB7 plasmid was built by combining LRB7 coding regions and PGEX-4T-3 plasmid and introduced into E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS. The transformed E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS was cultured in lysogeny broth (LB) medium for overnight. Then, 0.4 mL of liquid bacteria was cultured in 20 mL LB medium until the optical density (OD) reached 0.6 at 600 nm. By adding 24 µL of 20% isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside (20% IPTG), fusion proteins (GST-LRB7) were induced for 6 hr from 1 liter of liquid transformed bacteria, obtained by boiling for 12 min, separated by 12% SDS-PAGE gels, and purified by using GSTrap 4B (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) following the protocols. Next, purified GST-LRB7 proteins (100 µg) and Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (equal volume to GST-LRB7 protein medium, Sigma-Aldrich) were used to simultaneously immunize two Japanese adult male rabbits every two weeks. Blood serum of the rabbits was harvested and polyclonal antibody was purified by Protein A Sepharose (CL-4B) following standard protocol (Invitrogen) and purified by using affiliation column with bound GST to remove the anti-GST antibody. The purified anti-LRB7 was stored at −80°C in a buffer containing 1% BSA, 50% glycerol, and 0.02% sodium azide for further use.

2.8. Western Blot Analysis

Plant samples (200 mg) of roots, stems, and leaves were lysed by using Radio Immunoprecipitation Assay (RIPA lysis buffer) following protocol (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and homogenized in the ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (150 mM sodium chloride, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, and a mixture of protease inhibitors (Applygen Technologies Inc.)). After the precipitate was discarded, crude membrane fraction was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 RPM for 20 min at 4°C. Protein samples (30 µg) were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE gels and then blotted onto PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore) following the standard protocol. Primary antibody (anti-LRB7) was used to detect TIP, followed by secondary antibody (goat-anti-rabbit IgG, Applygen Technologies Inc.). The signals were detected and visualized by using ECL Western Blotting system (Amersham Bioscience).

2.9. Bioinformatics Analysis

The deduced protein of LRB7 gene was aligned with TIPs from other species using BioEdit 7.2.5 (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html). The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the genetic distance of protein sequence by ClustalX2 [24] and visualized by MEGA6 software (http://www.megasoftware.net/). The transmembrane helices of TIP2 were predicted using an online software TMHMM 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/). The membrane-spanning regions and its orientation were predicted using TMpred (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html).

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of LRB7 Gene in C. bungeana

To characterize the full cDNA sequence of LRB7 in C. bungeana, RB7 gene sequences from other species including Helianthus annuus (GenBank accession number X95953), Nicotiana tabacum (GenBank accession number S45406), Lycopersicon esculentum (GenBank accession number LEU95008), and Daucus carota (GenBank accession number AB000506) were used to design PCR primers P1, P2, and P4 (Figure 1). Using P1 and P2 primers, we initially obtained 392 bp fragment from the C. bungeana cDNA. Then, we used the resulting cDNA fragment to design P3 primer (Figure 1), obtained a fragment of 271 bp sequence by using P3 and P4 primers, and assembled a longer fragment (~626 bp) together with the first fragment. Further, based on this ~626 bp sequence we predicted the primers of 5′ GSP1, 5′ GSP2, 3′ GSP3, and 3′ GSP4 (Figure 1) for 5′ and 3′ RACE experiments and obtained the full length LRB7 cDNA (1004 bp, accession number EU636988) in C. bungeana. Then the full cDNA of LRB7 was used to design primers of P5 and P6 (Figure 1), which were used for C. bungeana genomic DNA amplifications. It is not surprising that the DNA sequence (958 bp) is consistent with the LRB7 cDNA sequence characterized by the 5′ and 3′ RACE experiments.

Next, the cDNA sequence of LRB7 in C. bungeana was identified to contain an open reading frame (ORF) of 753 bp, 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR, 104 bp), 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR, 173 bp), and 24 bp poly(A) tail (Figure 1). By comparing the cDNA sequence to genomic sequence, we identified three introns in LRB7 gene sequence, shown in Figure 2(a). The AT content of intron-1 and intron-2 was 84% and 75%, respectively. While analyzing the splicing sites, both introns conformed the standard GT/AG rule (Figure 2(b)).

3.2. Characterization of the Protein Encoded by LRB7 in C. bungeana

Then we characterized the protein product of LRB7 in C. bungeana. LRB7 was predicted to encode a protein of 250 amino acids, shown in Figure 1. The alignment of the deduced protein and eight other TIP sequences from species inducing Arabidopsis thaliana, Raphanus sativus, Pyrus communis, Triticum aestivum, Nicotiana glauca, Populus trichocarpa, Tamarix albiflonum, Oryza sativa, and Saccharum officinarum showed that the deduced protein had two conserved characteristic motifs of asparagines-praline-alanine (NPA) (Figure 2(c)). The first NPA motif, which is MIP family marker sequence (SGxHxNPAVT) [25], was found in loop b and the second NPA motif was found in loop e. Furthermore, six transmembrane helix regions (M1–M6) together with the N- and C-terminals towards the cytoplasmic side were predicted to strongly support that the protein product of LRB7 was from MIP (Figure 2(d)) family.

We next used ClustalX2 to analyze the conservation between the protein encoded by LRB7 and other MIP sequences. In total, we obtained 119 MIP sequences of 13 other species from NCBI database (Table 2). Phylogenetic tree analysis showed that LRB7 encoded aquaporin in C. bungeana was from TIP subgroup (see Figure S1 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2483258). We showed the phylogenetic tree analysis of LRB7 encoded protein with TIP sequences from other species (Figure 2(e)). These results told us that LRB7 encoded protein in C. bungeana was TIP2 [2629]. In addition, the putative TIP2 encoded by LRB7 showed identity of 95.6%, 61%, and 36% with TIP2 (AY085921) from A. thaliana, TIP1 (D84669) from R. sativus, and PIP1 (EU585602) from S. officinarum, respectively.


SubgroupNumberSpecies

NIP4P_trichocarpa; V_vinifera
NIP12R_communis
NIP21V_vinifera
NIP31B_distachyon
NIP43A_thaliana; B_distachyon
NIP52A_thaliana; V_vinifera
NIP64A_thaliana; G_max; P_trichocarpa
NIP74A_thaliana; G_max; V_vinifera
PIP5P_trichocarpa
PIP13G_max; V_vinifera; R_communis
PIP24A_thaliana; P_trichocarpa; R_communis; A_lyrata
PIP32A_thaliana
SIP3P_trichocarpa
SIP113A_thaliana; G_max; P_trichocarpa; V_vinifera; B_distachyon; A_lyrata
SIP213A_thaliana; G_max; P_trichocarpa; V_vinifera; B_distachyon; R_communis; A_lyrata
TIP7R_communis; A_lyrata
TIP17A_thaliana; B_distachyon; V_vinifera
TIP26A_thaliana; P_trichocarpa; A_lyrata
TIP33P_trichocarpa; A_lyrata
TIP44A_thaliana; G_max; P_trichocarpa; A_lyrata
TIP52A_thaliana; A_lyrata
Unknown26O_sativa; M_truncatula; S_moellendorffii; R_communis; P_patens; A_lyrata; S_bicolor; P_trichocarpa

3.3. LRB7 Gene Expression in Roots, Stems, and Leaves of C. bungeana

We next examined the expression of LRB7 gene in different tissues of C. bungeana by semiquantitative RT-PCR. The actin gene was used as internal control and primers for actin and LRB7 can be found in Table 1. Interestingly, the results showed that LRB7 gene was exclusively detectable in roots. In Figure 3(a), roots, stems, and leaves shared consensus PCR products of 350 bp, which was the actin gene product; however, the expected fragments (600 bp) for LRB7 suggested that it was expressed only in roots of C. bungeana.

3.4. TIP2 Abundance in Roots, Stems, and Leaves of C. bungeana

Then we isolated total proteins from leaves, stems, and roots of C. bungeana to measure the abundance of TIP2. To obtain the antibody (anti-LRB7) for western blot, we first confirmed the fusion protein GST-LRB7 in the cell lysates from E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS transformed with PGEX-4T-3-LRB7. In Figure 3(b). It is clear that there is an additional protein band (approximately 30 KDa) in CK2 (inducted with 20% IPTG), compared to CK1 (without induction). It meant that glutathione-S-transferase (GST) protein was successfully induced in CK2. Next, five cell lysates (lanes 1 to 5) from E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS transformed by PGEX-4T-3-LRB7 were cultured at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hr. Compared with CK1 and CK2, a protein band of approximately 45 kDa was found in these five lanes revealing that fusion protein GST-LRB7 was expressed successfully. The expression of GST-LRB7 was increased by induction time and reached the maximum at 4 hr. After antibody (anti-LRB7) was purified from the serum of male adult rabbits immunized by GST-LRB7 proteins, it was used for western blot analysis in leaves, stems, and roots of C. bungeana, respectively. The antiserum against protein encoded by LRB7 specially recognized 25 kD band only in roots, but not in stems or leaves (Figure 3(c)). Thus, it is deemed that LRB7 gene and its protein (TIP2) were expressed exclusively in roots, similar to TobRB7 gene (S45406) and DcRB7 gene (AB000506).

4. Discussion

Aquaporins are membrane channel proteins belonging to the major intrinsic protein (MIP) family and have been characterized in essentially all living organisms [30, 31]. The protein sequences of aquaporins show some highly conserved motifs including six putative transmembrane domains with the N- and C-terminals facing the cytosol, five loops (loops a–e in Figures 2(c) and 2(d)) joining the transmembrane helices, and two NPAs, of which “SGxHxNPAVT” is a maker of aquaporins [25] (Figure 2(d)). Among the five subgroups of MIP, PIPs and TIPs are the most abundant aquaporins in the plasma membrane and tonoplast, respectively [32]. In Arabidopsis there are 9 homologs of TIPs which have been characterized and the identity between each other is not high. Besides the phylogenetic tree analysis of protein sequences, further subgrouping of LRB7 encoded protein required the comparison of RNA sequences of MIPs [33]. As shown in Figure 4, the phylogenetic tree of 119 mRNA sequences of MIPs supported LRB7 of C. bungeana is TIP2 gene.

TIPs and other aquaporins can be detected in many cellular types of plants. For example, in Arabidopsis and Raphanus the genes encoding TIP2s are expressed highly in young shoot, rosette, and flower tissues [20, 21]. Although TIP2 has been identified in other plants [34], this is the first time to characterize the full cDNA and protein sequences of TIP2 in C. bungeana. Our findings fill the gaps of water channel protein identification of C. bungeana and are important to understand the mechanism of flowing water through roots to other tissues in C. bungeana. It may help understand the potential functions of aquaporins in chilling-tolerance because C. bungeana is an ideal material for investigating the chilling adaptation mechanism of the plant that can survive under frequent temperature fluctuations and freezing temperatures but does not possess special morphological characteristics for preventing chilling damage [18].

The mechanism of chilling-tolerance is tightly linked with redox balance of the cellular redox molecule. In early chilling, the redox transition of ubiquinone can not only ensure the fluency of electron transfer in mitochondria but also facilitate the regulation of the whole-cell redox states leading to adaptation of cellular regulations. Ca2+ distribution is a response of C. bungeana in adapting to the alpine subnival environment and the accumulation of Ca2+ can play an important role in active cold-hardiness [35]. A synergy between antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, dehydroascorbate reductase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase leads to a low autoxidation rate that contributes to the protection of the cell membranes and plays an important role in the resistance of suspension cultured cells of C. bungeana to sudden freezing [17].

In rice, a gene called RWC1 encoding 290-residue protein (a water channel protein) is experimented to involve in chilling-tolerance [36]. It is suggesting that water channel protein may affect its downstream cell activities under freezing environment. Linking LRB7 gene and TIP2 identified in this study to our previous RNA-Seq study [19], LRB7 gene has been assembled and detected in both cold-stressed (with the ID of T_21838) and control (with the ID of CK_16739) samples, resulting in 96% and 96% identities (Figure 5(a)). There are three genes whose products could match water channel proteins in other species characterized in the RNA-Seq study, showing the IDs of CBT8445, CBT42065, and CBT15440. Their expression levels are significantly upregulated in the cold-stressed sample, compared to control (Figure 5(b)). In addition, the RNA-Seq study has revealed that the upregulated genes in cold-stressed sample are enriched in the response of water deprivation. Based on these evidences, we implicate that LRB7 is associated with certain chilling-tolerance pathways; however, relationship between water channel proteins and chilling-tolerance should be well studied to attribute to elucidation of the chilling adaptation mechanism in C. bungeana by more functional experiments.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Ming Li, Tuo Chen, and Lizhe An designed the research; Ming Li, Zhaoxu Liang, Shanshan He, Kaichao Wu, Yan Jing, and Weikuan Fang performed the experiments; Cuixia Di, Guangxiu Liu, Jun Liang, Fang Tan, and Song Li contributed new reagents and analysis tools; Maoshan Chen and Yuan Zeng performed bioinformatics analysis; Ming Li, Zhaoxu Liang, and Lizhe An wrote the paper. Ming Li and Zhaoxu Liang contributed equally.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (31460093 and 31400281); Guangxi Scientific Research and Technology Development Plan (GuiKeZhong 14121005-1-2 and GuiKeGong 1598006-1-1D); Nanning Scientific Research and Technology Development Plan (20131038); the Development Foundation of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science (2015JZ15 and 2015JZ91).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1. Phylogenetic analysis of the protein encoded by LRB7 in Chorispora bungeana and MIPs from other species. It revealed the protein encoded by LRB7 was from TIP2 subfamily because it was clustered with TIP2 proteins encoded by A. Thaliana (NP_193465.1 and NP_199556.1) and A. lyrata (XP_002870110.1 and XP_002863344). LRB7 encoded protein and TIP2 proteins encoded by other species were colored in light green.

  1. Supplementary Material

References

  1. Y. Yamaji, S. Seki, K. Matsukawa, C. Koshimoto, M. Kasai, and K. Edashige, “Developmental ability of vitrified mouse oocytes expressing water channels,” Journal of Reproduction and Development, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 403–408, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. M. Preston, T. P. Carroll, W. B. Guggino, and P. Agre, “Appearance of water channels in Xenopus oocytes expressing red cell CHIP28 protein,” Science, vol. 256, no. 5055, pp. 385–387, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Maurel, J. Reizer, J. I. Schroeder, and M. J. Chrispeels, “The vacuolar membrane protein γ-TIP creates water specific channels in Xenopus oocytes,” EMBO Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 2241–2247, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  4. G. Calamita, W. R. Bishai, G. M. Preston, W. B. Guggino, and P. Agre, “Molecular cloning and characterization of AqpZ, a water channel from Escherichia coli,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 49, pp. 29063–29066, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Ishibashi, M. Kuwahara, Y. Gu et al., “Cloning and functional expression of a new water channel abundantly expressed in the testis permeable to water, glycerol, and urea,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 33, pp. 20782–20786, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. J. Daniels, T. E. Mirkov, and M. J. Chrispeels, “The plasma membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana contains a mercury-insensitive aquaporin that is a homolog of the tonoplast water channel protein TIP,” Plant Physiology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1325–1333, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. A. Nagelhus, M. L. Veruki, R. Torp et al., “Aquaporin-4 water channel protein in the rat retina and optic nerve: polarized expression in Muller cells and fibrous astrocytes,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 2506–2519, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. W. Kammerloher, U. Fischer, G. P. Piechottka, and A. R. Schäffner, “Water channels in the plant plasma membrane cloned by immunoselection from a mammalian expression system,” Plant Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 187–199, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Maeshima, “Tonoplast transporters: organization and function,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, vol. 52, pp. 469–497, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. S. Wallace, W.-G. Choi, and D. M. Roberts, “The structure, function and regulation of the nodulin 26-like intrinsic protein family of plant aquaglyceroporins,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Biomembranes, vol. 1758, no. 8, pp. 1165–1175, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. V. Khabudaev, D. P. Petrova, M. A. Grachev, and Y. V. Likhoshway, “A new subfamily LIP of the major intrinsic proteins,” BMC Genomics, vol. 15, article 173, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. Kaldenhoff, A. Bertl, B. Otto, M. Moshelion, and N. Uehlein, “Characterization of plant aquaporins,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 428, pp. 505–531, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. P. Cristoffanini, “New Chilean university legislation applied to the medical sciences. A dual imitation? An ambiguous imitation? A bad imitation?” Revista Medica de Chile, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 379–381, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  14. D. Fu and M. Lu, “The structural basis of water permeation and proton exclusion in aquaporins (Review),” Molecular Membrane Biology, vol. 24, no. 5-6, pp. 366–374, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Kaldenhoff and M. Fischer, “Functional aquaporin diversity in plants,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes, vol. 1758, no. 8, pp. 1134–1141, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Maurel, “Plant aquaporins: novel functions and regulation properties,” FEBS Letters, vol. 581, no. 12, pp. 2227–2236, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F.-X. Guo, M.-X. Zhang, Y. Chen et al., “Relation of several antioxidant enzymes to rapid freezing resistance in suspension cultured cells from alpine Chorispora bungeana,” Cryobiology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 241–250, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Liu, H. Jiang, Z. Zhao, and L. An, “Abscisic acid is involved in brassinosteroids-induced chilling tolerance in the suspension cultured cells from Chorispora bungeana,” Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 168, no. 9, pp. 853–862, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. Zhao, L. Tan, C. Dang, H. Zhang, Q. Wu, and L. An, “Deep-sequencing transcriptome analysis of chilling tolerance mechanisms of a subnival alpine plant, Chorispora bungeana,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 12, article 222, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. J. Daniels, F. Chaumont, T. E. Mirkov, and M. J. Chrispeels, “Characterization of a new vacuolar membrane aquaporin sensitive to mercury at a unique site,” Plant Cell, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 587–599, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Higuchi, S. Suga, T. Tsuchiya et al., “Molecular cloning, water channel activity and tissue specific expression of two isoforms of radish vacuolar aquaporin,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 905–913, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. U. Johanson, M. Karlsson, I. Johansson et al., “The complete set of genes encoding major intrinsic proteins in arabidopsis provides a framework for a new nomenclature for major intrinsic proteins in plants,” Plant Physiology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 1358–1369, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. J. Doyle and E. E. Dickson, “Preservation of plant-samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis,” Taxon, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 715–722, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. A. Larkin, G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown et al., “Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0,” Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 2947–2948, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Reizer, A. Reizer, and M. H. Saier Jr., “The MIP family of integral membrane channel proteins: sequence comparisons, evolutionary relationships, reconstructed pathway of evolution, and proposed functional differentiation of the two repeated halves of the proteins,” Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 235–257, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Borgnia, S. Nielsen, A. Engel, and P. Agre, “Cellular and molecular biology of the aquaporin water channels,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 68, pp. 425–458, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. I. Johansson, M. Karlsson, U. Johanson, C. Larsson, and P. Kjellbom, “The role of aquaporins in cellular and whole plant water balance,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Biomembranes, vol. 1465, no. 1-2, pp. 324–342, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. S. Verkman and A. K. Mitra, “Structure and function of aquaporin water channels,” American Journal of Physiology—Renal Physiology, vol. 278, no. 1, pp. F13–F28, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  29. G. M. Preston, J. S. Jung, W. B. Guggino, and P. Agre, “The mercury-sensitive residue at cysteine 189 in the CHIP28 water channel,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  30. R. Kaldenhoff and M. Fischer, “Aquaporins in plants,” Acta Physiologica, vol. 187, no. 1-2, pp. 169–176, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Verdoucq, A. Grondin, and C. Maurel, “Structure-function analysis of plant aquaporin AtPIP2;1 gating by divalent cations and protons,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 415, no. 3, pp. 409–416, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. V. Novikova, C. Tournaire-Roux, I. A. Sinkevich, S. V. Lityagina, C. Maurel, and N. Obroucheva, “Vacuolar biogenesis and aquaporin expression at early germination of broad bean seeds,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 82, pp. 123–132, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. L. Forrest and M. Bhave, “The PIP and TIP aquaporins in wheat form a large and diverse family with unique gene structures and functionally important features,” Functional and Integrative Genomics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 115–133, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Gattolin, M. Sorieul, P. R. Hunter, R. H. Khonsari, and L. Frigerio, “In vivo imaging of the tonoplast intrinsic protein family in Arabidopsis roots,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 9, article 133, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. T. Zhang, Y. Liu, L. Xue et al., “Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel MAP kinase gene in Chorispora bungeana,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 78–84, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L.-G. Li, S.-F. Li, Y. Tao, and Y. Kitagawa, “Molecular cloning of a novel water channel from rice: its products expression in Xenopus oocytes and involvement in chilling tolerance,” Plant Science, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Ming Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views973
Downloads262
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.