About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 3970831, 9 pages
Research Article

Resistance of Permafrost and Modern Acinetobacter lwoffii Strains to Heavy Metals and Arsenic Revealed by Genome Analysis

1Institute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kurchatov Sq. 2, Moscow 123182, Russia
2Institute of Bioengineering, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Ave. 33, Bld. 2, Moscow 119071, Russia

Received 20 April 2016; Revised 14 July 2016; Accepted 7 September 2016

Academic Editor: Peter F. Stadler

Copyright © 2016 Sofia Mindlin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


We performed whole-genome sequencing of five permafrost strains of Acinetobacter lwoffii (frozen for 15–3000 thousand years) and analyzed their resistance genes found in plasmids and chromosomes. Four strains contained multiple plasmids (8–12), which varied significantly in size (from 4,135 to 287,630 bp) and genetic structure; the fifth strain contained only two plasmids. All large plasmids and some medium-size and small plasmids contained genes encoding resistance to various heavy metals, including mercury, cobalt, zinc, cadmium, copper, chromium, and arsenic compounds. Most resistance genes found in the ancient strains of A. lwoffii had their closely related counterparts in modern clinical A. lwoffii strains that were also located on plasmids. The vast majority of the chromosomal resistance determinants did not possess complete sets of the resistance genes or contained truncated genes. Comparative analysis of various A. lwoffii and of A. baumannii strains discovered a number of differences between them: (i) chromosome sizes in A. baumannii exceeded those in A. lwoffii by about 20%; (ii) on the contrary, the number of plasmids in A. lwoffii and their total size were much higher than those in A. baumannii; (iii) heavy metal resistance genes in the environmental A. lwoffii strains surpassed those in A. baumannii strains in the number and diversity and were predominantly located on plasmids. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

1. Introduction

The presence of plasmids, extrachromosomal self-replicating circular DNA molecules, in most bacterial species is connected to their key role in rapid adaptation to changing environmental conditions without altering the gene content of the bacterial chromosome. Typically, in addition to few essential genes a plasmid harbors genes coding for ecologically important properties such as variable metabolic processes, nitrogen fixation, resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals, and pathogen virulence.

In recent years, with the revolution in sequencing technologies the number of sequenced bacterial plasmids increased dramatically and reached about 4600 [1], but only a small number of these plasmids have been analyzed in detail. In particular, not enough attention was paid to such important issues as evolution and dynamics of plasmids in natural bacterial populations, despite a number of works that were devoted to this research [27]. Bacteria belonging to the Acinetobacter genus are a convenient model for such studies since these are ubiquitous bacteria that play an important role in different ecological niches including soil, water, and association with animals and, at the same time, some of them are common human pathogens. For instance, Fondi et al. [8] have undertaken a study of evolutionary relationships between 29 Acinetobacter plasmids using the information on sequenced plasmids. It should be noted that the authors included in the list of analyzed sequences eight plasmids containing deficient mercury resistance transposons described in our previous work [9]. The authors demonstrated the important role of rearrangements between different plasmids and concluded that transposases and selective pressure for mercury resistance have played a pivotal role in plasmid evolution in Acinetobacter. Unfortunately, only small regions (less than 10%) of the mercury resistance Acinetobacter plasmids were sequenced at that time and this fact was not taken into account. In addition, the selected plasmids did not represent adequately the diversity of plasmids hosted by different strains belonging to the Acinetobacter genus.

Recently, we could continue our studies on the molecular structure and phylogenetic relations of Acinetobacter’s plasmids using next-generation sequencing methods. For our studies we have chosen five ancient strains belonging to Acinetobacter lwoffii, guided by the following considerations: (i) in comparison with plasmids of A. baumannii, plasmids of A. lwoffii have been studied very little; (ii) in the last years, A. lwoffii strains were included in the list of dangerous pathogens to humans.

Surprisingly, analysis of genomic sequences demonstrated that all the ancient strains isolated from uncontaminated permafrost sediments contained plasmids with genes of resistance to salts of heavy metals and arsenic. We hypothesized that not only mercury but also other heavy metals have played and continue to play an important role in the evolution of Acinetobacter. This prompted us to study the occurrence and abundance of such genes in the genomes of A. lwoffii isolates. Here we describe the results of analysis of the structure and distribution of heavy metals and arsenic resistance genes found in the genomes of ancient as well as of modern strains of A. lwoffii.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The ancient Acinetobacter lwoffii strains used in this study (Table 1) were previously isolated from permafrost sediments collected from different regions of Kolyma Lowland [9, 10]. All strains were grown in lysogeny broth (LB) medium or solidified LB medium (LA) [11] at 30°C.

Table 1: Characteristics of permafrost Acinetobacter lwoffii strains.
2.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Assembly of Plasmids

The genomes of the ancient A. lwoffii strains were sequenced with a Roche GS FLX genome sequencer (Roche, Switzerland) using the Titanium protocol to prepare shotgun genomic libraries. Approximately 40-fold sequence coverage was achieved for each genome. The GS FLX reads were assembled into contigs using the GS De Novo Assembler (Roche); among them, we identified those contigs that contained genes for mobilization and/or replication of plasmids. PCR was used to close the gaps between assembled plasmid contigs and to confirm their circular structure.

2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

For the assembly and analysis of plasmid genomes from ancient strains the program UGENE (http://unipro.ru/) was used. Similarity searches were performed using BLAST [12] and REBASE [13]. Open reading frames (ORFs) were searched using ORF Finder and BLAST software at NCBI. Conserved domains and motifs were identified using the NCBI Conserved Domain Database (CDD) [14] and the Pfam database [15]. Contigs from the whole-genome shotgun sequences of clinical A. lwoffii strains were considered chromosomal if their size exceeded 300 kb and if they contained housekeeping genes. Relatively small (less than 200 kb) contigs were attributed to plasmids or their parts if they contained determinants typical for plasmids and/or if they contained no housekeeping genes.

2.4. Standard DNA Manipulations

Standard protocols were used for DNA isolation and agarose gel electrophoresis [11]. PCR was performed with a Mastercycler (Eppendorf) using Taq DNA polymerase and Long PCR Enzyme Mix (for amplification fragments more than 6 kbp) with supplied buffers (Thermoscientific), dNTP mixture (Thermoscientific), and appropriate primers. Amplified DNA fragments were sequenced using conventional Sanger method (Applied Biosystems 3730 Genetic Analyzer) at the Interinstitute Genome Center (Moscow).

2.5. Determination of the MICs for Heavy Metals and Arsenic Salts’ Resistance

The level of resistance was determined by the agar dilution method [16]. The MICs of heavy metals and arsenic salts for the ancient A. lwoffii strains were determined. Bacterial strains were grown in LB broth at 30°C with shaking for 3 h and diluted 100-fold with fresh broth. 5 μL of the bacterial suspension (about 5 × 106 cells per mL) was plated with a bacteriological loop onto LA (to determine the MICs of As3, As5, Hg, and Cr) or Adams [11] (to determine the MICs of Cu, Co, Cd, and Zn) plates supplemented with heavy metals and arsenic salts. The used salts and their concentrations (mM) tested were as follows: AsNaO2 (As3): 5, 10, 20, and 30; Na2HAsO4  ×  7H2O (As5): 20, 40, and 60; K2Cr2O7 (Cr): 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8; CuSO4  ×  5H2O (Cu): 0.9, 1.8, 2.7, 3.6, and 4.0; HgCl2 (Hg): 0.015, 0.03, and 0.06; CdCl2  ×  H2O (Cd): 0.01, 0.025, and 0.05; CoCl2  ×  6H2O (Co): 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1; ZnSO4  ×  7H2O (Zn): 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, and 6.4; NiSO4  ×  7H2O (Ni): 0.45, 0.9, 1.8, and 2.7. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 24–30 h and visually inspected.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Five Ancient Permafrost Strains of A. lwoffii and Identification of the Resistance Plasmids

During analysis of the whole-genome shotgun contigs of five ancient permafrost strains of A. lwoffii (Table 1), we paid the main attention to assembly and identification of plasmids. In total, to date we have identified 35 plasmids. It was found that 4 of 5 bacterial strains contained 8–12 plasmids and one strain carried 2 plasmids. The plasmids varied considerably in size (from 4,135 to 287,630 bp) and structural features. In our previous work, we identified and described in detail one of the small plasmids, pALWED1.8 with streptomycin/spectinomycin gene aadA27 [17]. In the present work, we focused on the study of resistance genes to heavy metals and arsenic salts found in all the plasmids. Therefore, we first identified the plasmids harboring genes encoding resistance to salts of mercury (mer operons), arsenic (ars operons), chromium, copper (cop locus), and cobalt/zinc/cadmium (czc determinants).

Although all strains were isolated from pristine permafrost sediments, each of them contained one or two plasmids carrying different combinations of resistance genes to heavy metals and arsenic salts (Table 2).

Table 2: Characteristics of ancient plasmids carrying heavy metal resistance determinants and corresponding MICs.

We hypothesize that the abundance and diversity of the resistance genes may be associated with the environmental habitat of the ancient strains. We decided to test the functional activity of the detected resistance genes, to analyze the structure of the resistance determinants found in ancient plasmids, and to check the presence of the resistance genes and their localization in genomes of modern strains of A. lwoffii.

3.2. Functional Activity of Resistance Genes

To test the activity of resistance determinants identified in the ancient plasmids the levels of resistance to salts of mercury, arsenic, chromium, copper, cobalt, zinc, cadmium, and nickel of five permafrost A. lwoffii strains were examined. For this purpose, MICs for different salts were determined by the agar dilution method (see Section 2). We carried out five independent experiments. All strains containing resistance genes were able to grow at higher concentrations of corresponding toxic compounds compared with strains not containing resistance determinants (Table 2). Thus, it can be concluded that at the high probability all detected resistance genes are functionally active. However, czc determinants in some strains provided resistance to salts of not all three metals (cobalt/zink/cadmium), but only two of them. For example, the strain ED9-5а was sensitive to cobalt and ЕК30А to zinc salts. These facts can be explained by the existence of a complex transcriptional regulation of different components of the czc system described in [18].

3.3. Structure of Resistance Determinants Revealed on the Plasmids from Ancient A. lwoffii Strains
3.3.1. Mer Operons

The mer operons of Gram-negative bacteria contain a metalloregulator gene (merR) and three structural genes: genes that encode a transport system that delivers the toxic mercuric ions into the cells (merTP) and a gene that encodes an intracellular enzyme, mercuric reductase (merA), which converts mercuric ions into less toxic metallic mercury [19]. Thus, the minimum set of essential mercury resistance genes is merRTPA; other genes (merC, merF, merD, merE, orf2, and orfY) occur in various combinations in the mer operons of Gram-negative bacteria and are not essential accessory genes. Mercury resistance operons and transposons of Acinetobacter strains have been the subject of our previous studies. In particular, mer operon of permafrost A. lwoffii strain ED23-35 studied in this work was described in detail in 2004 [9]. It was shown that in addition to the standard set of mer genes (merRTPCADE) characteristic to Acinetobacter strains it contains gene merB encoding organomercurial lyase. In this study, we found mer operons in two more strains resistant to mercury, ED45-23 and ED9-5a (Table 3). Mer operons of these strains were almost identical to each other and unlike strain ED23-35 did not contain the merB gene (Figure 1).

Table 3: Heavy metal resistance operons identified in permafrost strains of A. lwoffii.
Figure 1: Genetic structure of resistance regions detected in the five large permafrost multiresistance plasmids (scheme). The location and polarity of genes are shown with arrows; genes belonging to mer operon are marked in red; ars operon in yellow; chromium resistance genes in green; cop genes in blue; czc in orange; nickel resistance genes in magenta; and genes with unknown functions and foreign genes in white. Numbers show the size of the sequences located between different resistance determinants and genes.
3.3.2. Chromium Resistance Determinants

Genetic analysis of chromate resistant bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa [20] and Alcaligenes eutrophus [21] has shown that main genes encoding the chromium resistance are genes chrA, encoding the chromate transporter protein, and chrB, encoding chromate resistance protein, probably performing the functions of a regulator. A hydrophobic membrane protein, ChrA, catalyzes the active efflux of chromate (chromate efflux pump) from the cytoplasm and chromate or dichromate induces expression of the chrA gene through the action of chrB [22]. It should be noted that, besides chrA and chrB, some accessory genes have been found in transposons and plasmids of chromate resistance bacteria.

Previously, chromium resistant bacteria were isolated from various groups of the genus Acinetobacter, in particular from A. lwoffii [23]. However, the resistance determinants in these bacteria were not described.

We revealed the chrA and chrB genes in three permafrost strains, ED23-35, ED9-5a, and EK30A (Tables 2 and 3). In all these strains chromium resistance genes were located on small plasmids pALWED1.3, pALWED3.5, and pALWEK1.5, respectively, and were almost identical (99% identity at the nucleotide sequence level) on their molecular structure. At the same time, these plasmids differed by their length as well as by the set and structure of essential genes. In particular, plasmid pALWED3.5 contained a mobA gene while in two others this gene was absent.

Interestingly, strain ED23-35 contained one more pair of the chrA-chrB genes. They were located on the largest plasmid pALWED1.1 (Figure 1) and differed significantly from the chromium resistance genes located on the small plasmids in their structure (identity about 60–70% at the nucleotide sequence level). Moreover, we could not reveal genes closely related to this variant of the chrAB genes in public databases.

Thus it can be concluded that chromium resistance genes chrAB are widely spread in environmental A. lwoffii strains. Because almost identical genes are present on different plasmids harbored by different A. lwoffii strains it can be proposed that they can spread via horizontal gene transfer.

3.3.3. Copper Resistance Determinants

Copper is needed for cell metabolism but is toxic at elevated concentrations. This challenge has led to the evolution of complex mechanisms of copper resistance in bacteria. Now a number of different systems that allow bacterial cells to survive in the presence of high concentration of copper have been identified in different taxa of bacteria [2428].

We found copper resistance determinants on plasmids from four permafrost A. lwoffii strains. They were located on the large plasmids (pALWED2.1, pALWED3.1, pALWVS1.1, and pALWEK1.1) (Table 3). We studied genetic structure of the resistance determinants harbored by pALWVS1.1 and revealed that they are characterized by unique features. We found that they are closely related to the copper resistance determinants of Acinetobacter baumannii AB0057 (CP001182.1) and Acinetobacter johnsonii XBB1 (CP010350.1) which are located on their chromosomes and form a single cluster. In addition to genes copABCD this cluster contains genes encoding copper-exporting ATPase (copF), heavy metal sensor kinase (copS), and transcriptional activation protein (copR). An unusual characteristic of the copper resistance determinants of Acinetobacter strains is the location of the copAB and copCD genes at a considerable distance from each other, on both sides of other genes involved in copper resistance (Figure 1); in other bacterial species these four genes are linked together and are parts of the same operon [26, 27, 29].

It should be noted that the cluster of copper resistance genes revealed in pALWVS1.1 in comparison with the above-mentioned chromosomal clusters contained an extra fragment about 5000 bp inserted into the region located between the copC and copF genes (Figure 1). In this fragment we detected genes encoding two transposases and integrase. The same clusters of copper resistance genes were detected in pALWED3.1 and pALWEK1.1.

The genes of copper resistance found in pALWED2.1 are closely related to those described above but form a more complex mosaic structure as a result of the insertion of a large DNA fragment (about 12 kb). This insert contained (i) an extra copy of the copA-copB genes (with the identity level about 68–74% to the standard copy); (ii) genes encoding cation transporter and methyltransferase; (iii) genes encoding transposases of different IS elements.

To our knowledge, such complex operons of copper resistance have not yet been studied in detail.

3.3.4. Determinants of Arsenic Resistance

To overcome the toxic effect of arsenic compounds bacteria use different mechanisms based on their active extrusion, extracellular precipitation and chelation, and intracellular transformation [30]. Several genetic systems encoding arsenic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria were revealed and studied to date [30, 31]. We studied in detail the structure of plasmids of two permafrost A. lwoffii strains, ED45-23 and ED5-9a, resistant to arsenic compounds (Table 2). Indeed, in each of these strains we revealed a single plasmid containing genes involved in arsenic resistance. These were plasmid pALWED2.1 (190039 bp) and plasmid pALWED3.1 (138027 bp). In both plasmids we detected almost identical ars operons containing six genes: trxB, arsH, arsB, arsC1, arsR, and arsC2 (Table 3 and Figure 1). Based on the analysis of published data it can be suggested that the genes of ars operon encode the following polypeptides: organoarsenic oxidase, thioredoxin reductase, oxyanion translocation protein, arsenate reductase, arsenite-inducible repressor, and second arsenate reductase protein [30, 32, 33].

The structure of ars operons involved in arsenic resistance in A. lwoffii was most similar to those (ars H, arsB, arsC, and arsR) described in P. putida (NC_002947) and in Herminiimonas arsenicoxydans [30]. A significant difference was the presence of two additional genes: trxB at the beginning of ars operon and the arsC at the end of this operon. It should be mentioned that to our knowledge such variants of the ars operons have not been described yet.

3.3.5. Determinants of Resistance to Co/Zn/Cd

One of the first studied plasmid-encoded transport systems directed on elimination of toxic cations is the czc efflux system [34]. The czc resistance operon was originally found and studied in plasmid of A. eutrophus CH34. It was shown that czc operon includes four genes encoding four proteins, CzcA, CzcB, CzcC, and CzcD, from which CzcA is the central protein with efflux capacities [35].

We revealed functionally active czc operons in four permafrost A. lwoffii strains: ED23-35, ED9-5a, EK30A, and VS15 (Table 2). The czc operon harbored by pALWVS1.1 included the four genes czcD, czcA, czcB, and czcC (Table 3 and Figure 1). Closely related czc operon was found in the strain EK30A on the plasmid pALWEK1.1 (identity about 97%). These two operons were for convenience designated czc1. Two other czc operons differed from czc1 as well as one from another.

The czc2 operon revealed on the plasmid pALWED1.1 (strain ED23-35) was only distantly related to czc1 (about 50% identity at aa sequence level). In addition, between genes czcD and czsA it contained about 4 kb insertion with six ORFs, including three ones encoding the resistance to nickel (rcnR, nreB, and gene of Ni permease). Accordingly, strain ED23-35, as opposed to other A. lwoffii strains, was resistant to nickel salt (Table 3 and Figure 1).

The third czc operon, czc3, located on plasmid pALWED3.1 (strain ED9-5a) differed significantly from czs1 as well as from czc2. This operon was most closely related (97% identity) to the chromosomal czc operon of Moraxella osloensis CCUG 350 (CP014234), bacterial strain belonging to another genus of Moraxellaceae family. This observation certainly suggests the involvement of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of heavy metal resistanсe in bacteria.

It should be noted that the czc2 operon as well as chrA-chrB genes located on plasmid pALWED1.1 differed significantly from respective determinants found on the other plasmids. It can be assumed that these differences are due to different functional characteristics of these plasmids: plasmid pALWED1.1 is conjugative, while the two others are not.

3.4. Distribution of Resistance Genes in Chromosomes and Plasmids of A. lwoffii

We determined the distribution of the resistance determinants found in plasmids of permafrost strains in plasmids of clinical A. lwoffii strains and in chromosomes of environmental and clinical strains of A. lwoffii.

We focused on the analysis of contigs obtained in our work during the whole-genome sequencing of ancient A. lwoffii strains and of whole-genome shotgun sequences of clinical A. lwoffii strains obtained from public databases. It should be noted that, unlike A. baumannii strains, no complete genome sequence of A. lwoffii was published and all whole-genome shotgun sequences of this species belong to clinical strains.

We have found in the clinical strains the whole set of resistance determinants which we revealed on the plasmids of the permafrost strains (see Table  S1 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3970831). However, there were significant differences between the determinants found on chromosomes and plasmids. The determinants revealed on the plasmids of clinical strains were closely related to those of the permafrost strains plasmids. The chromosomal determinants of all kinds/types formed distinct lineages and were characterized by different features in comparison with plasmid determinants (Table 4).

Table 4: Heavy metal resistance determinants in chromosomes and plasmids in strains of A. lwoffii.

In particular, we detected on presumably plasmid contigs of clinical A. lwoffii strains mer operons, ars operons, czc operons, cop operons, and chrA-chrB genes almost identical (99-100% identity) to those located in the permafrost plasmids (Table  S1). It is important to note also that in the plasmids of the clinical strains the different resistance determinants were linked to each other (Table  S1). For instance, we have found in similar 14 kb contigs of the strains NIPH512 and NBRC 109760 resistance determinants to mercury, arsenic, and chromium and in the strain NIPH 715 (33 kb contig) resistance determinants to mercury, arsenic, and copper (in Table  S1 these contigs are shown in bold). Therefore the linked location of operons involved in the resistance to different heavy metals can be regarded as a characteristic feature of A. lwoffii plasmids.

Resistance determinants located on bacterial chromosomes differed from the plasmids by several features: (i) the vast majority of chromosomal operons contained incomplete sets of genes or defective operons (the only exception is the czc operon and genes chrA and chrB from the strain CIP64.10 (APQS00000000)) (Table 4); (ii) the proteins encoded by chromosome and plasmid genes shared less than 85% identical amino acid residues (from 44% to 83%) and differed by their size (Table 4). Note that all these features are common to the environmental as well as to clinical A. lwoffii strains.

To illustrate this situation it is best to consider the data on the structure of chromosomal ars operons and their distribution in the chromosomes of A. lwoffii (Table  S2). It is seen that, in many cases, chromosomal ars operons are incomplete (missing one or two from six genes) (Table  S2). In other cases all genes are present, but apparently the operon is functionally nonactive due to nonsense or frame-shift mutations or deletions in some of its genes. To verify the functional activity of chromosomal ars operons we compared the resistance to arsenic of ancient A. lwoffii strains containing plasmid-encoded ars operon (ED45-23 and ED9-5a) and strains containing only chromosomal ars operons (ED23-35, VS15, and EK30a). All three strains with only chromosomal ars genes were sensitive to arsenic, unlike strains containing plasmid operons (Table 2). Thus, ancient A. lwoffii strains contain active ars operons only in their plasmids. However, it can be suggested that chromosomal ars operons played an important role in the evolution of A. lwoffii, because of their presence in multiple copies on chromosomes in ancient as well as in present-day strains of this species.

It should be noted that other chromosomal operons (cop, czc, and chrA-chrB), as a rule, also did not contain a complete set of genes. The mer operon was an exception since we failed to detect its chromosomal copies in any of the studied strains of A. lwoffii.

3.5. Comparative Analysis of Genomes of A. lwoffii and A. baumannii

Our data indicate that functionally active operons of A. lwoffii encoding resistance to heavy metal salts are preferably located on plasmids and that many strains of A. lwoffii are characterized by the presence of numerous plasmids, including plasmids larger than 100 kb. To determine whether these properties are also inherent to clinical Acinetobacter strains, especially to strains of A. baumannii, we compared genomic sequences of A. lwoffii and A. baumannii, with particular attention to the size of their chromosomes and the number and structure of their plasmids.

For our comparative analysis, we selected a collection of well-studied strains of A. baumannii described in the work of Ou et al. [36].

Based on the phylogenetic data, three of the strains (AYE, AB307-0294, and AB0057) belonged to global clone I (GC I). Two of the three BJAB strains (BJAB07104 and BJAB0868), along with 4 previously reported Asia strains, including MDR-ZJ06 (China), MDR-TJ (China), ABTCD0715 (Taiwan), and AB1656-2 (Korean), were grouped together with ACICU, a strain of global clone II (GC II) group. The strain BJAB0715 probably has a different origin in comparison with other drug-resistant strains. Strains ATCC17978 and AB307-0294 were susceptible to antibiotics and strain SDF was isolated from a human body louse [32, 36].

In addition, we analyzed a number of A. baumannii strains whose genomes were completely sequenced and studied in recent years. In total, we analyzed the genomes of 31 strains of A. baumannii.

Unlike A. baumannii, A. lwoffii strains have only recently begun to be actively studied. To date, information on the whole-genome shotgun sequencing of only 7 clinical isolates of A. lwoffii was deposited to database, but the authors did not perform their analysis. In our work we complemented the existing data by sequencing of the genomes of five ancient A. lwoffii strains isolated from permafrost deposits.

Analysis of clinical A. lwoffii genomes demonstrated that average size of the genomes of the present-day clinical strains is about 3.4 Mbp (Table  S3). According to our data, the genomes of permafrost A. lwoffii strains have similar sizes.

Comparative analysis of well-studied strains of A. baumannii demonstrated that they have genome size of about 4.0 Mbp and contain no more than 4 plasmids (Table  S4). Despite the differences in the number and quality of the genomic sequences of the two species, the results clearly indicate that the dimensions of the A. baumannii chromosomes exceeded those of A. lwoffii by about 20%. Less reliable conclusion is possible about the differences in the number of plasmids present in the strains of A. baumannii and A. lwoffii due to the limited data available. It seems that the plasmids in the A. lwoffii strains are more numerous than in A. baumannii.

At present, many plasmids found in A. baumannii strains are identified and sequenced. We have analyzed the structure of 34 medium-size and large plasmids but detected only one plasmid (pD36-4) containing full mer operon and one with fragments of ars operon (pAB3). At the same time, we detected full resistance operons in chromosomes of many strains of this species. For instance, we revealed mer and ars operons in the chromosomes of strains AYE and AB0057 [3]; copper operon in the chromosomes of strains LAC-4, ATCC 17978, and AB0057 [31]; czc operons in the chromosomes of strains ATCC17978 (CP000521), ACICU (CP000863), AB5075-UW (CP008706), AB0057 (CP001182), and AYE (CU459141).

Thus, unlike A. baumannii plasmids, plasmids of A. lwoffii carry a big load of functionally active heavy metal resistance determinants; this corresponds to larger numbers and sizes of plasmids in A. lwoffii compared to A. baumannii (Table 2 and Table  S4).

The nature of these differences, whether or not they are associated with lifestyles of two species in distinct ecological niches, is a subject for further studies.

4. Conclusions

We for the first time sequenced and analyzed several large plasmids (130–280 kb), which encode genes multiresistance to heavy metals and arsenic compounds, in environmental strains of A. lwoffii, a potential human pathogen. All five large plasmids of A. lwoffii contained genes of heavy metal resistance in different combinations. In particular, we revealed genes of resistance to mercury, arsenate, chromium, copper, nickel, and cobalt/zinc/cadmium. The cop loci and ars operon differed by their structure from those described earlier. Mer and ars operons were linked to each other. We also obtained preliminary data showing that large plasmids encoding for multiresistance to heavy metals are present in clinical isolates of A. lwoffii. Thus it seems that in A. lwoffii determinants of heavy metal resistance are often located on plasmids.

A completely different situation was revealed in studies of metal-resistant A. baumannii strains. We have analyzed completely sequenced genomes of 31 A. baumannii strains from public databases including their chromosomes as well as plasmids. As a rule, heavy metal resistance genes forming full operons were located on chromosomes and only sometimes were they found on plasmids. In most cases, chromosomal resistance genes were related to the plasmid genes found in A. lwoffii strains. Furthermore, the average chromosome size of A. baumannii exceeded that of A. lwoffii by about 20%, which might indicate the higher role of chromosomes of A. baumannii in their lifestyle in comparison with A. lwoffii.

The results of our work suggest the occurrence of two different strategies in two species of the same genus revealed by different structural and functional roles of plasmids and chromosomes. One can speculate that these two strategies may be due to the fact that A. lwoffii strains, unlike A. baumannii, mainly inhabit natural environments. Furthermore, our data support hypothesis that not only mercury but also other heavy metals and arsenic have great impact on the evolution of Acinetobacter genomes. The accuracy of these conclusions should be confirmed by further studies of plasmids harbored by both environmental and clinical strains of A. lwoffii.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


This research was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Grants 14-04-01917 and 14-04-01317, and by the Russian Academy of Sciences Presidium Program “Molecular and Cellular Biology” (grants to A. Kulbachinsky and A. Mardanov). The authors are grateful to A. Kulbachinsky for helpful comments and suggestions and for critical reading of the manuscript.


  1. M. Shintani, Z. K. Sanchez, and K. Kimbara, “Genomics of microbial plasmids: classification and identification based on replication and transfer systems and host taxonomy,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, article 242, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. M. Coombs and T. Barkay, “New findings on evolution of metal homeostasis genes: evidence from comparative genome analysis of bacteria and archaea,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 7083–7091, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P.-E. Fournier, D. Vallenet, V. Barbe et al., “Comparative genomics of multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 2, no. 1, article e7, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. S. Moghadam, A. Albersmeier, A. Winkler et al., “Isolation and genome sequencing of four Arctic marine Psychrobacter strains exhibiting multicopper oxidase activity,” BMC Genomics, vol. 17, no. 1, article 117, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Touchon, J. Cury, E. J. Yoon et al., “The genomic diversification of the whole acinetobacter genus: origins, mechanisms, and consequences,” Genome Biology and Evolution, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 2866–2882, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. D. Vallenet, P. Nordmann, V. Barbe et al., “Comparative analysis of acinetobacters: three genomes for three lifestyles,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 3, Article ID e1805, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Zhu, Z. Yan, Z. Zhang et al., “Complete genome analysis of three Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in China for insight into the diversification of drug resistance elements,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e66584, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Fondi, G. Bacci, M. Brilli et al., “Exploring the evolutionary dynamics of plasmids: the Acinetobacter pan-plasmidome,” BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 10, article 59, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Kholodii, S. Mindlin, Z. Gorlenko, M. Petrova, J. Hobman, and V. Nikiforov, “Translocation of transposition-deficient (TndPKLH2-like) transposons in the natural environment: mechanistic insights from the study of adjacent DNA sequences,” Microbiology, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 979–992, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. A. Petrova, S. Z. Mindlin, Zh. M. Gorlenko, E. S. Kaliaeva, V. S. Soina, and E. S. Bogdanova, “Mercury-resistant bacteria from permafrost sediments and prospects for their use in comparative studies of mercury resistance determinants,” Genetika, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1569–1574, 2002 (Russian). View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Sambrook and D. W. Russel, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratiry Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2001.
  12. S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer et al., “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3389–3402, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. J. Roberts, T. Vincze, J. Posfai, and D. Macelis, “REBASE-A database for DNA restriction and modification: enzymes, genes and genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. D234–D236, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Marchler-Bauer, S. Lu, J. B. Anderson et al., “CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, supplement 1, pp. D225–D229, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. D. Finn, J. Mistry, J. Tate et al., “The Pfam protein families database,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. D211–D222, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Hirai, H. Aoyama, S. Suzue, T. Irikura, S. Iyobe, and S. Mitsuhashi, “Isolation and characterization of norfloxacin-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli K-12,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 248–253, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Kurakov, S. Mindlin, A. Beletsky et al., “The ancient small mobilizable plasmid pALWED1.8 harboring a new variant of the non-cassette streptomycin/spectinomycin resistance gene aadA27,” Plasmid, vol. 84-85, pp. 36–43, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. C. Große, G. Grass, A. Anton et al., “Transcriptional organization of the czc heavy-metal homeostasis determinant from Alcaligenes eutrophus,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 8, pp. 2385–2393, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Barkay, S. M. Miller, and A. O. Summers, “Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 27, no. 2-3, pp. 355–384, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Cervantes, H. Ohtake, L. Chu, T. K. Misra, and S. Silver, “Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of the chromate resistance determinant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa plasmid pUM505,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 287–291, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Nies, D. H. Nies, and S. Silver, “Nucleotide sequence and expression of a plasmid-encoded chromate resistance determinant from Alcaligenes eutrophus,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 10, pp. 5648–5653, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. H. Alvarez, R. Moreno-Sánchez, and C. Cervantes, “Chromate efflux by means of the ChrA chromate resistance protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 23, pp. 7398–7400, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Francisco, M. C. Alpoim, and P. V. Morais, “Diversity of chromium-resistant and -reducing bacteria in a chromium-contaminated activated sludge,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 837–843, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. L. Brown, D. A. Rouch, and B. T. O. Lee, “Copper resistance determinants in bacteria,” Plasmid, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41–51, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Cervantes and F. Gutierrez-Corona, “Copper resistance mechanisms in bacteria and fungi,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 121–137, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Basim, G. V. Minsavage, R. E. Stall, J.-F. Wang, S. Shanker, and J. B. Jones, “Characterization of a unique chromosomal copper resistance gene cluster from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 8284–8291, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. von Rozycki and D. H. Nies, “Cupriavidus metallidurans: evolution of a metal-resistant bacterium,” Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 115–139, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. P. Ng, E. A. Palombo, and M. Bhave, “The heavy metal tolerant soil bacterium Achromobacter sp. AO22 contains a unique copper homeostasis locus and two mer operons,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 742–753, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Silver and G. Ji, “Newer systems for bacterial resistances to toxic heavy metals,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 102, supplement 3, pp. 107–113, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Andres and P. N. Bertin, “The microbial genomics of arsenic,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 299–322, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. S. Silver and L. T. Phung, “Bacterial heavy metal resistance: new surprises,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 50, pp. 753–789, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Ye, H.-C. Yang, B. P. Rosen, and H. Bhattacharjee, “Crystal structure of the flavoprotein ArsH from Sinorhizobium meliloti,” FEBS Letters, vol. 581, no. 21, pp. 3996–4000, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Chen, H. Bhattacharjee, and B. P. Rosen, “ArsH is an organoarsenical oxidase that confers resistance to trivalent forms of the herbicide monosodium methylarsenate and the poultry growth promoter roxarsone,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1042–1052, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Silver and M. Walderhaug, “Gene regulation of plasmid- and chromosome-determined inorganic ion transport in bacteria,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 195–228, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Nies, D. H. Nies, and S. Silver, “Cloning and expression of plasmid genes encoding resistances to chromate and cobalt in Alcaligenes eutrophus,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 171, no. 9, pp. 5065–5070, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H.-Y. Ou, S. N. Kuang, X. He et al., “Complete genome sequence of hypervirulent and outbreak-associated Acinetobacter baumannii strain LAC-4: epidemiology, resistance genetic determinants and potential virulence factors,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, article 8643, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus