Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 4540826, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4540826
Research Article

Enhancing the Feasibility of Microcystis aeruginosa as a Feedstock for Bioethanol Production under the Influence of Various Factors

1Department of Biotechnology, Chonnam National University, San 96-1, Dun-Duk Dong, Yeosu, Chonnam 550-749, Republic of Korea
2Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 550-757, Republic of Korea
3Research Center on Anti-Obesity and Health Care, Chonnam National University, San 96-1, Dun-Duk Dong, Yosu, Chonnam 550-749, Republic of Korea
4Department of Environmental Oceanography, Chonnam National University, San 96-1, Dun-Duk Dong, Yeosu, Chonnam 550-749, Republic of Korea
5Department of Refrigeration Engineering, Chonnam National University, San 96-1, Dun-Duk Dong, Yeosu, Chonnam 550-749, Republic of Korea
6Department of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 550-757, Republic of Korea

Received 31 March 2016; Accepted 4 May 2016

Academic Editor: Pengjun Shi

Copyright © 2016 Muhammad Imran Khan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Microcystis aeruginosa, a freshwater microalga, is capable of producing and accumulating different types of sugars in its biomass which make it a good feedstock for bioethanol production. Present study aims to investigate the effect of different factors increasing growth rate and carbohydrates productivity of M. aeruginosa. MF media (modified BG11 media) and additional ingredients such as aminolevulinic acid (2 mM), lysine (2.28 mM), alanine (1 mM), and Naphthalene acetic acid (1 mM) as cytokine promoted M. aeruginosa growth and sugar contents. Salmonella showed growth-assisting effect on M. aeruginosa. Enhanced growth rate and carbohydrates contents were observed in M. aeruginosa culture grown at 25°C under red LED light of 90 μmolm−2s−1 intensity. More greenish and carbohydrates rich M. aeruginosa biomass was prepared (final OD660 nm = 2.21 and sugar contents 10.39 mM/mL) as compared to control (maximum OD660 nm = 1.4 and sugar contents 3 mM/mL). The final algae biomass was converted to algae juice through a specific pretreatment method. The resulted algae Juice was used as a substrate in fermentation process. Highest yield of bioethanol (50 mM/mL) was detected when Brettanomyces custersainus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Pichia stipitis were used in combinations for fermentation process as compared to their individual fermentation. The results indicated the influence of different factors on the growth rate and carbohydrates productivity of M. aeruginosa and its feasibility as a feedstock for fermentative ethanol production.

1. Introduction

The depletion of fossil fuels due to continuous consumption throughout the world and their contribution in environmental pollution and global warming shifted the interests of researchers to explore sustainable, economical, and ecofriendly energy sources alternative to petroleum based fuels [1, 2]. Bioethanol is an excellent substitute to gasoline fuels as comparatively cheap, convenient, and environmentally safe transportation fuels [3, 4]. Nowadays scientists are taking keen interests in bioethanol production from renewable feedstocks [5]. Algae are photosynthetic organism producing considerable amounts of carbohydrates which can be converted to bioethanol through fermentation process [6]. Algae as a feedstock for bioethanol production have many environmental and economical advantages [7]. Microalgae possess unique features such as rapid growth [8], high CO2-absorbing capacity, no need of cultivable land, and nonedibility which make it preferable over other feedstocks. In addition, the absence of lignin in algal cell wall facilitates the pretreatment of biomass and reduces the cost associated with pretreatment [9]. Furthermore, the simple structure and the ability to endeavor harsh environment also give them preference [10]. Some algal species cause blooming in fresh waters, which have harmful effects on aquatic life [11]. Microcystis aeruginosa is blooming in freshwater of rivers and lakes producing harmful toxin, microcystin which kills the aquatic life in that zone, and contamination of a catchment area. Hence, using M. aeruginosa as a feedstock will be not only novel, feasible, and economical for bioenergy generation but also helpful in removing the toxic blooms.

Despite the adventitious aspects of algae as a potential feedstock for bioethanol production, there had not been done an appreciable work in this field. The research in this area is limited [12, 13]. One of the major limitations in this subject is the comparatively lower sugar contents in algal biomass as compared to lipids contents; that is why algal biomass is mostly used for biodiesel production. The algal carbohydrates are also of great importance for bioethanol production and some algae species possess more carbohydrates contents than lipids.

In order to improve this technology, there is a need of huge amounts of carbohydrates rich biomass. The amounts of sugars in the algal biomass are the basic and major requirements for bioethanol production. Higher yield of bioethanol needs algal biomass with higher amounts of carbohydrates. Hence, growing carbohydrates rich algae is a good solution.

The quantity of carbohydrates produced by algae is completely dependent on photosynthesis. For efficient photosynthesis algae required moderate quantity of CO2, optimum light intensity, optimum temperature, and suitable nutrients composition [14, 15]. Photosynthetic pigments in the algae cells, such as phycocyanin and chlorophyll, also play major and key role in photosynthesis. Most greenish algae can produce high amount of carbohydrates because of their high chlorophyll contents. Our aim of this work was to investigate the optimum conditions and nutrient composition for growing M. aeruginosa with higher growth rate and carbohydrates contents in order to obtain a carbohydrates rich algal biomass for generating higher yield of bioethanol.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Media Preparation

M. aeruginosa was cultured in modified BG11 medium (MF medium) with increased amount of Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4) and freshly added urea. Ingredients of MF medium (BG11 modified medium) were dissolved in natural lake water. pH of the medium was set to 7.02. Trace elements were added from stock solutions at 1 mL/L of the MF medium. Naphthalene acetic acid (NPA; 1 mM) was the cytokinin added to the medium. 2 mL of vitamin complex (BeecomhexaYuhan Corporation) was added per liter of the media. Lysine, alanine, NH4OH, glucose, and aminolevulinic acid (LA) were added as 2.28 mM, 1 mM, 1 mM, and 2 mM, respectively. The volume of alanine, lysine, and LA added was 5 mL/L of the media. Similarly, 5 mL NH4OH and 10 mL 1 mM glucose were added per liter of the media to the respective flasks.

2.2. Algae Culturing

Different strategies were applied to grow more greenish and dense algae in a short time. First algae were cultured at flasks level and then in small bioreactor. All the requirements of light, CO2, air, and continuous shaking were ensured. LED light was provided under 16/8-hour light/dark regime. First algae were grown both under blue and red LED light of same strength (70 μmolm−2s−1) to determine the most supportive wavelength for algae growth and after determination various intensities of the most supportive wavelength were tested for fast growth of M. aeruginosa. The flasks were kept in a shaking incubator at 100 rpm. Temperature was kept 25°C throughout the culture. Associative bacteria Salmonella (OD660 = 0.86) were added to the culture in its log phase at 50 mL/L for the purpose of assisting M. aeruginosa growth.

2.3. Biomass and Sugar Contents Analysis

Samples after every 24-hour intervals were taken and were analyzed for biomass and sugar contents. Two milliliters of sample were used to evaluate the algae growth by determining OD at 660 nm. The biomass was hydrolyzed with 5 M H2SO4 for one hour and the resulting hydrolysate was neutralized with 10 M NaOH and centrifuged. The carbohydrates contents in the centrifuged algal juice were determined by following the method of Miller, 1959 [16], for reducing sugar analysis with small modification. 1 mL of the sample was mixed with 1 mL of dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) solution and was heated at 100°C on a heating block for 10 minutes. Thereafter, the samples were immediately cooled by placing in cold water and the absorbance was checked at 575 nm.

2.4. UV Treatment

It has been studied extensively that the carbohydrate contents of algae can be increased under stress conditions, so that harsh environment was created for M. aeruginosa by exposing it to UV for 5 hours before pretreatment in order to increase its carbohydrates contents. The difference in growth pattern was monitored and the morphology of UV-treated algae was investigated with an image analyzing system (Nikon, Japan).

2.5. Biomass Preparation and Fermentation

M. aeruginosa culture was dewatered very efficiently with electric flocculation. Electric field was applied to M. aeruginosa culture which concentrated the algae from water. As microalgae cells possess negative charge, algae can be separated from water by applying an electric field [17, 18]. The resulting concentrated biomass was treated with 0.05% TiO2 and 0.01% CaO and then subjected to microwaves for 2 hours. Cellic CTech2 (Novozymes) was used for breaking the algal cell wall components and to liberate the internal sugars contents to the external media. Cellic CTech2 was added at 0.02 mL/L of the algae at pH 4.5. After the addition of enzyme Cellic CTech2, biomass was kept in a shaking incubator at 50°C for 4 hours. Further saccharification of the biomass was made by acid hydrolysis at high temperature. The biomass was treated with 5 M H2SO4 followed by autoclaving at 100°C for one hour. The purpose of all of the pretreatment methods was to produce algal juice enriched with monomeric sugar contents (fermentable sugars). The final filtered algae juice after autoclaving was then used as a substrate for fermentation process.

Three different microorganisms were used for converting the sugars of the algae juice to bioethanol, that is, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Brettanomyces custersainus, and Pichia stipites. These microorganisms were used both individually and in combination in order to investigate the efficient fermentation with maximum yield. Fermentation process was carried out in 3 L volume fermenter with 1 L algal substrate containing the respective media for the used microorganisms. Temperature was kept 27°C throughout the fermentation process. After every one-hour interval sample was taken and analyzed for alcohol contents by dichromate analysis method [19].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

SPSS was used for statistical analysis. All experiments were performed in duplicates and triplicates. Data are the mean values ± standard deviation. Data was analyzed using ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

3. Results and Discussions

Growth of M. aeruginosa was determined by measuring OD of the algae with a spectrophotometer at 660 nm. OD (optical density) is proportional to the density of the algal population in the suspension. An increased growth of M. aeruginosa was achieved by optimizing different parameters, such as temperature, light intensity, type of culture media, and additional nutrients. Light and CO2 supply was ensured throughout the culture. The effect of a parameter on algal growth was determined by the increase in biomass and sugar content of M. aeruginosa culture.

3.1. Growth Condition with Media

M. aeruginosa was cultured in both modified and original BG11 media. The modified BG11 medium showed effectiveness in supporting algal growth. The growth rate of M. aeruginosa was increased in the modified medium compared to that in the original BG11 medium (Figure 1). The modified medium was distinct from the BG11 medium in that the modified medium contained urea, an increased level of phosphate, Fe ion, and decreased Ca2+ (Table 1). M. aeruginosa cultured in the modified BG11 medium showed an increased OD and carbohydrate concentration in comparison to that cultured in the BG11 medium.

Table 1: (a) Ingredients (g/L) in BG11 and modified BG11 medium. (b) Trace metals solution.
Figure 1: Effect of medium composition on M. aeruginosa growth. Data represent mean values of different experiments performed in duplicate ± standard deviation.
3.2. Growth Condition with Red/Blue Wavelength

The light requirements of M. aeruginosa for photosynthesis and its effect on the growth of the algae were examined by culturing it under red and blue light. The growth of M. aeruginosa increased under red wavelength compared to that under blue wavelength (Figure 2). It has been studied experimentally that red light favors formation of cell walls and intercellular matrix, cell division, and accumulation of carbohydrates and increases the photosynthetic efficiency of unicellular green algae [20].

Figure 2: Effect of light wavelength on M. aeruginosa growth. Values are the averages of different experiments performed in duplicate ± standard deviation.
3.3. Growth Condition with Light Strength

M. aeruginosa culture was tested under different light intensities of red LED light that is 50 μmolm−2s−1, 70 μmolm−2s−1, and 90 μmolm−2s−1. The highest OD of M. aeruginosa was observed in the culture grown under 90 μmolm−2s−1 (Figure 3). Duration and intensity of light have a direct effect on photosynthesis and growth of microalgae. A constant light and dark period is necessary for growth of algae. Light period is required for photosynthesis and production of ATP and NADH while dark period is needed for synthesis of molecules essential for growth [21]. It has been experimentally proved that different weight of algae biomass is produced by culturing under different light intensities [22]. Although different algae species require different range of light intensities, most of the algae species show maximum growth in moderately high light intensity. Ifeanyi et al. 2011 [23] experimentally proved a rise in growth rate of Aphanocapsa alga cultured under light of 5000 lux which is about 90 μmolm−2s−1.

Figure 3: Effect of light intensity on M. aeruginosa growth. Values are the averages of different experiments performed in duplicate ± standard deviation.
3.4. Growth Condition with Temperature

M. aeruginosa was cultured under different temperature that is 20°C, 25°C, and 30°C. The cultured grown very well at 25°C as compared to other cultures grown under various temperature ranges (Figure 4). Reduction in the growth rate was observed below and above 25°C. Algae species varies in the temperature requirements. Temperature has a key and crucial role in the growth of living organisms. Most of the algae species have their optimum temperature at which they grow to the maximum. Konopka and Brock (1978) [24] reported optimum growth of Microcystis, Aphanizomenon, and Anabaena at 25°C.

Figure 4: Effect of temperature on M. aeruginosa growth. Values are the averages of different experiments performed in duplicate ± standard deviation.
3.5. Growth Condition with Cytokines

Naphthalene acetic acid (NPA), synthetic auxin, was used as cytokines to stimulate M. aeruginosa growth. The growth rate of M. aeruginosa was increased upon the addition of NPA to the culture media. A difference was noted in the growth rate of the two cultures of M. aeruginosa with and without cytokines (Figure 5). Our results were assisted by Hunt et al. 2010 [25] who reported that NPA had a favorable influence on the growth of Chlorella sorokiniana.

Figure 5: M. aeruginosa growth in presence and absence of cytokine. Values are the averages of different experiments performed in duplicate ± standard deviation.
3.6. UV Treatment

Carbohydrates contents were increased when M. aeruginosa culture was subjected to UV treatment for 5 hours (Figure 6). Morphological changes were observed in M. aeruginosa, after exposure to UV. Changes in the cell shape were examined with the help of an image analyzer system (Figure 7). With exposure to UV radiation for a specific duration of time, the algae cells modify their metabolic pathways for rapid synthesis of carbohydrates and lipids.

Figure 6: Effect of UV on M. aeruginosa sugar contents. Data represents mean values of different experiments performed in duplicate ± standard deviation.
Figure 7: M. aeruginosa morphology under image analyzing system (Nikon, Japan) before and after UV treatment.
3.7. Optimal Growth Condition with Ingredients

OD and reduced sugar contents were measured in the samples drawn from each flask and bioreactor rafter every 24 hours.

3.7.1. Flask Level Culture

Media ingredients in flasks are shown in Table 2. The highest yield of carbohydrates (10.0 mM) and biomass (OD660 nm = 2.2) were obtained in flask 3 while the lowest were found in flask 8 (Figure 8). Flask 3 contained lysine, Salmonella, and LA added to MF medium which favored high growth rate of M. aeruginosa. NH4OH showed growth retarding effect but in combination with LA and Salmonella it becomes less effective in growth retardation in flask 7. Flask 4 showed higher OD and carbohydrates contents than all other flasks after flask 3 due to the presence of salmonella and lysine but it was lower in OD and sugar contents than flask 3 due to the absence of LA. Amino acids can be transformed to polyamines, such as spermidine, diaminopropane, and cadaverine, by the action of microorganisms which are crucial in enhancing algal growth [26] that is why amino acids alanine and lysine were added to M. aeruginosa culture. LA acts as a precursor for photosynthetic pigments in bacteria and blue green algae, probably through the tetra pyrrole biosynthetic pathway [27]. Some bacterial strains have beneficial effects on algal growth; studies have revealed the association and the beneficial exchange of nutrients between some algae and bacterial species [28]. Bacteria may improve algal growth in several ways. They may provide extracellular growth stimulating factors in the media, which may have a beneficial effect on the algal photosynthesis and growth. Bacteria also possess the ability to degrade various nitrogenous compounds, which can be readily used by algae [29]. Some bacteria produce phytohormones, the polyamines, which are very important for algal and plant growth [30]. Specific bacterial strains possess the ability of producing and releasing vitamins to the external medium which are very important for algal growth as they require exogenous vitamins for their growth [31].

Table 2: Flask level culture; absence and presence of different ingredients and bacteria in flasks. Flask 1 was taken as a control.
Figure 8: Flask level culture. (a) OD biomass (per mL) in different flasks versus time. (b) Glucose concentration (mM/mL) in different flasks versus time. Data represents mean values of different experiments performed in triplicate ± standard deviation.
3.7.2. Algae Culture in Bioreactor

Algae were cultured in 20 L bioreactor under the above tested conditions of maximum growth rate and carbohydrates contents. Ingredients composition in bioreactors was kept like flask 3 as maximum growth rate and sugar contents were detected in flask 3. When OD of the culture reached 2.0 and sugar contents 10 mM then the culture was harvested as biomass for bioethanol production.

3.8. Fermentation

As a result of the above used different conditions sugar rich algal juice was prepared and was used as a substrate for fermentation. S. cerevisiae, B. custersainus, and P. stipites were tested for their abilities of fermenting the algal juice to bioethanol. The highest yield of bioethanol (50 mM/mL) was noted when the three different microorganisms were used in combination. Individually B. custersainus showed higher yield of fermentative ethanol as compared to S. cerevisiae and P. stipites (Figure 9). The reason of B. custersainus higher bioethanol yield may be due to its ability of fermenting a wide range of sugars including cellobiose and maltose, [32] while Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the most commonly used ethanol producing microorganism, is unable to hydrolyzed pentoses. Similarly, P. stipites has the ability of converting xylose and rhamnose to ethanol but unable to act on other types of sugars [33] and the carbohydrates composition of M. aeruginosa includes different types of sugars [34] such as glucose, sucrose, cellobiose, maltose, ribose, lactose, rhamnose, galactose, and xylose (Table 3).

Table 3: Carbohydrates composition of Microcystis aeruginosa.
Figure 9: Fermentation of algae juice to bioethanol by three different microorganisms (alcohol contents/mL). (a) Fermentation by Brettanomyces custersianus. (b) Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (c) Fermentation by Pichia stipitis. (d) Combine fermentation. Data are the mean of values of different experiments performed in triplicate ± standard deviation.

Algae are recently being explored as a renewable and sustainable feedstock for biofuels production [35]. However, at commercial level this technology needs more improvements and advancement for producing huge volumes of algal biomass and efficient pretreatment and conversion to bioethanol to compete the prices of fossil fuels [36]. Algae as a substrate for bioethanol production have not attracted admirable interest of researcher. Majority of algal species have relative low carbohydrates content except certain species which have relatively high sugar contents. However, this drawback can be overcome by increasing algal carbohydrates contents through media composition and applying stress condition to algae culture [37]. M. aeruginosa contains a verity of sugars, which can be utilized for bioethanol production. Microalgae enriched with carbohydrates can produce 46,760–140,290 (L/ha) ethanol yield greater than any other feedstock [38]. In the present study, we focused on optimizing different parameters that enhance M. aeruginosa growth rate and sugar contents and efficient conversion to bioethanol.

4. Conclusion

M. aeruginosa possesses different types of sugars in its biomass. The higher growth rate of M. aeruginosa is crucial in increasing its carbohydrates contents. Lysine, Salmonella, cytokine, and LA have growth promoting effect on M. aeruginosa growth rate and carbohydrates productivity. M. aeruginosa was cultured in short time with enhanced growth rate and increased quantities of carbohydrates. A higher yield of bioethanol was obtained from the sugar rich algal juice by the combined fermentation process. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of M. aeruginosa as feed stock for bioethanol production.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The research reported in this paper was funded by the Small and Medium Business Administration (2014-2387).

References

  1. S. A. Khan, Rashmi, M. Z. Hussain, S. Prasad, and U. C. Banerjee, “Prospects of biodiesel production from microalgae in India,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2361–2372, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. D. Klass, Biomass for Renewable Energy. Fuels and Chemical, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  3. C. R. Carere, R. Sparling, N. Cicek, and D. B. Levin, “Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1342–1360, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. P. Hammond, S. Kallu, and M. C. McManus, “Development of biofuels for the UK automotive market,” Applied Energy, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 506–515, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Sánchez-Segado, L. J. Lozano, D. De Juan García, C. Godínez, A. P. De Los Ríos, and F. J. Hernández-Fernández, “Life Cycle Assessment analysis of ethanol production from carob pod,” Chemical Engineering Transactions, vol. 21, pp. 613–618, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Aikawa, A. Nishida, S.-H. Ho, J.-S. Chang, T. Hasunuma, and A. Kondo, “Glycogen production for biofuels by the euryhaline cyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002 from an oceanic environment,” Biotechnology for Biofuels, vol. 7, article 88, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. S. Jones and S. P. Mayfield, “Algae biofuels: versatility for the future of bioenergy,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 346–351, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Banerjee, R. Sharma, Y. Chisti, and U. C. Banerjee, “Botryococcus braunii: a renewable source of hydrocarbons and other chemicals,” Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 245–279, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Q. Hu, M. Sommerfeld, E. Jarvis et al., “Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances,” The Plant Journal, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 621–639, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Li, M. Horsman, N. Wu, C. Q. Lan, and N. Dubois-Calero, “Biofuels from microalgae,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 815–820, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. H. Best, S. Pflugmacher, C. Wiegand, F. B. Eddy, J. S. Metcalf, and G. A. Codd, “Effects of enteric bacterial and cyanobacterial lipopolysaccharides, and of microcystin-LR, on glutathione S-transferase activities in zebra fish (Danio rerio),” Aquatic Toxicology, vol. 60, no. 3-4, pp. 223–231, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. N. Rosenberg, G. A. Oyler, L. Wilkinson, and M. J. Betenbaugh, “A green light for engineered algae: redirecting metabolism to fuel a biotechnology revolution,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 430–436, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Sulfahri and T. Nurhidayati, “Aerobic and anaerobic process of spirogyra extract using different modes of Zymomonas mobilis,” Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 420–425, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  14. G. D. Price, M. R. Badger, F. J. Woodger, and B. M. Long, “Advances in understanding the cyanobacterial CO2-concentrating- mechanism (CCM): functional components, Ci transporters, diversity, genetic regulation and prospects for engineering into plants,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1441–1461, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. A. Raven, M. Giordano, J. Beardall, and S. C. Maberly, “Algal evolution in relation to atmospheric CO2: carboxylases, carbon-concentrating mechanisms and carbon oxidation cycles,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1588, pp. 493–507, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. L. Miller, “Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 426–428, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. Zhang, P. Amendola, J. C. Hewson, M. Sommerfeld, and Q. Hu, “Influence of growth phase on harvesting of Chlorella zofingiensis by dissolved air flotation,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 116, pp. 477–484, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. D. Kumar, P. K. Yadava, and J. P. Gaur, “Electrical flocculation of the unicellular green alga Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck,” Aquatic Botany, vol. 11, pp. 187–195, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H.-B. Seo, H.-J. Kim, O.-K. Lee, J.-H. Ha, H.-Y. Lee, and K.-H. Jung, “Measurement of ethanol concentration using solvent extraction and dichromate oxidation and its application to bioethanol production process,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 285–292, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Senge and H. Senger, “Adaptation of photosynthetic apparatus of Chlorella and Ankistrodesmas to blue and red light,” Botanica Acta, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 139–143, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. B. Cheirsilp and S. Torpee, “Enhanced growth and lipid production of microalgae under mixotrophic culture condition: effect of light intensity, glucose concentration and fed-batch cultivation,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 110, pp. 510–516, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Z. Khoeyi, J. Seyfabadi, and Z. Ramezanpour, Effect of Light Intensity and Photoperiod on Biomass and Fatty Acid Composition of the Microalgae, Springer Science + Business Media, 2011.
  23. V. O. Ifeanyi, B. N. Anyanwu, J. N. Ogbulie, R. N. Nwabueze, W. Ekezie, and O. S. Lawal, “Determination of the effect of light and salt concentrations on aphanocapsa algal population,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 5, no. 17, pp. 2488–2492, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Konopka and T. D. Brock, “Changes in photosynthetic rate and pigment content of blue-green algae in Lake Mendota,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 527–532, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. W. Hunt, S. Chinnasamy, A. Bhatnagar, and K. C. Das, “Effect of biochemical stimulants on biomass productivity and metabolite content of the microalga, Chlorella sorokiniana,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 162, no. 8, pp. 2400–2414, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Fuell, K. A. Elliott, C. C. Hanfrey, M. Franceschetti, and A. J. Michael, “Polyamine biosynthetic diversity in plants and algae,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 513–520, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. Y. K. Ho and J. Lascelles, “δ-Aminolevulinic acid dehydratase of Spirillum itersonii and the regulation of tetrapyrrole synthesis,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 734–740, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. T. Rier and R. J. Stevenson, “Effects of light, dissolved organic carbon, and inorganic nutrients on the relationship between algae and heterotrophic bacteria in stream periphyton,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 489, no. 1, pp. 179–184, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. W. Pearl, “Epi and endo biotic interactions of cyanobacteria in algae and symbiosis. Plant, animals, fungi, viruses, interaction explored,” Journal of General Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 23–45, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  30. J. Du, G. Zhao, F. Wang et al., “Growth stimulation of Microcystis aeruginosa by a bacterium from hyper-eutrophic water (Taihu Lake, China),” Aquatic Ecology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 303–313, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. L. Miller and V. W. Rodwell, “Metabolism of basic amino acids in Pseudomonas putida. Catabolism of lysine by cyclic and acyclic intermediates,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 246, no. 9, pp. 2758–2764, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. B. Vanderhaegen, H. Neven, S. Coghe, K. J. Verstrepen, G. Derdelinckx, and H. Verachtert, “Bioflavoring and beer refermentation,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 62, no. 2-3, pp. 140–150, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Kumar, L. K. Singh, and S. Ghosh, “Bioconversion of lignocellulosic fraction of water-hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) hemicellulose acid hydrolysate to ethanol by Pichia stipitis,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 13, pp. 3293–3297, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. D. Kim, G. W. Chae, H. J. Seo et al., “Bioalcohol production with microalgae, microcystis aeruginosa,” Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering Journal, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 335–340, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. Liu, J. Huang, and F. Chen, “Microalgae as feedstocks for biodiesel production,” in Biodiesel Feedstocks and Processing Technologies, M. Stoytcheva, Ed., vol. 78, p. 58, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  36. M. K. Lam and K. T. Lee, “Microalgae biofuels: a critical review of issues, problems and the way forward,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 673–690, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. Markou, I. Angelidaki, and D. Georgakakis, “Microalgal carbohydrates: an overview of the factors influencing carbohydrates production, and of main bioconversion technologies for production of biofuels,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 631–645, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Matsumoto, H. Yokouchi, N. Suzuki, H. Ohata, and T. Matsunaga, “Saccharification of marine microalgae using marine bacteria for ethanol production,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 105, no. 1–3, pp. 247–254, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus