BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 5318176 | 6 pages |

In Vitro Growth Inhibitory Activities of Natural Products from Irciniid Sponges against Cancer Cells: A Comparative Study

Academic Editor: Michael Greenwood
Received21 May 2016
Accepted18 Jul 2016
Published11 Aug 2016


Marine sponges of the Irciniidae family contain both bioactive furanosesterterpene tetronic acids (FTAs) and prenylated hydroquinones (PHQs). Both classes of compounds are known for their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties and known to display growth inhibitory effects against various human tumor cell lines. However, the different experimental conditions of the reported in vitro bioassays, carried out on different cancer cell lines within separate studies, prevent realistic actual discrimination between the two classes of compounds from being carried out in terms of growth inhibitory effects. In the present work, a chemical investigation of irciniid sponges from Tunisian coasts led to the purification of three known FTAs and three known PHQs. The in vitro growth inhibitory properties of the six purified compounds have been evaluated in the same experiment in a panel of five human and one murine cancer cell lines displaying various levels of sensitivity to proapoptotic stimuli. Surprisingly, FTAs and PHQs elicited distinct profiles of growth inhibitory-responses, differing by one to two orders of magnitude in favor of the PHQs in all cell lines. The obtained comparative results are discussed in the light of a better selection of drug candidates from natural sources.

1. Introduction

The great majority of cancer patients (i.e., ~90%) die from their metastases because metastatic cancers are resistant to almost any type of currently available treatment [1, 2], while the survival rates of patients with metastatic or recurrent cancers have remained virtually unchanged during the past 30 years [2]. Cancer cells and especially metastatic cancer cells resist cytotoxic insults through multiple and biologically complex mechanisms including dual roles for autophagy [3], the so-called multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype [4, 5], cancer cell dormancy [6, 7], cancer stem cells [8, 9], an extraordinary sophisticated tumor microenvironment [1012], hypoxia [13], and also the resistance to proapoptotic stimuli [14, 15]. There is thus urgent need for new effective drugs in oncology that could face the extraordinary complex phenomenon of the metastatic process. In this area of research, the exploration of the nature chemical diversity still remains a major option to select the best candidates as novel therapeutics against metastatic cancers. In general, initial selection of promising bioactive products is made by evaluating their in vitro growth inhibitory activity.

Among the richest natural sources of candidates as potential anticancer agents, marine sponges (phylum Porifera) already provided a wide range of cytotoxic metabolites with peculiar chemical structures. This report, in particular, focuses on compounds isolated from sponges of the genera Ircinia and Sarcotragus (Demospongiae: Dictyoceratida: Irciniidae).

Two major classes of compounds from irciniid sponges have especially attracted the attention of marine natural product chemists and pharmacologists: (a) linear terpenes containing both a furan ring and the tetronic acid moiety (FTAs) and (b) hydroquinones with a terpenoid portion (PHQs). Although it is still not clear whether the compounds are of dietary origin, produced by microbial symbionts, or de novo biosynthesized by the sponges themselves, a panel of bioactivities with pharmaceutical potential, including cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties, have been attributed to both classes of compounds [1626]. It is worth mentioning, however, that compounds belonging to the two different groups of compounds isolated from irciniid sponges have not yet been compared in the same study using the same experimental procedures for growth inhibition assessments against the same panel of cancer cell lines, thus preventing from establishing reliable differences between themselves, at least in vitro, in terms of potential anticancer effects.

The following is a report on our experiments aimed at potency discrimination between compounds belonging to both classes of compounds in terms of in vitro growth inhibition in a panel of six cancer cell lines with distinct levels of biological aggressiveness as translated by distinct levels of sensitivity to proapoptotic stimuli. The research is thus especially aimed at assessing at which extent the different chemical features of the isolated compounds affect their in vitro growth inhibitory activities and if the patterns of in vitro growth inhibition of these compounds are similar to the ones displayed by classical cytotoxic proapoptotic ones. In other words, we explored the ability of the metabolites to induce cell death pathways that are mechanistically distinct from apoptosis [27, 28].

We first isolated compounds 16 (Table 1) from samples of Sarcotragus fasciculatus (Pallas, 1766), Sarcotragus spinosulus Schmidt, 1862, and Sarcotragus foetidus Schmidt, 1862, collected along Tunisian coasts. Subsequently, to evaluate the growth inhibitory activities of the purified natural products, we have tried to recapitulate one of the characteristics of metastatic cancer cells, that is, their ability to resist proapoptotic cytotoxic insults, while using established cancer cell lines developing alone in plastic flasks. We have thus chosen six cancer cell lines (five human and one murine ones) with distinct levels of sensitivity to proapoptotic stimuli to determine the in vitro growth inhibitory activity of compounds 16. The selected human MCF-7 mammary adenocarcinoma [29] and Hs683 oligodendroglioma [30, 31] cell lines display actual sensitivity to proapoptotic stimuli, as does also the mouse B16F10 melanoma model [32, 33]. The remaining three human cancer cell lines display various levels of resistance to proapoptotic stimuli and they included the A549 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [34], the SKMEL-28 melanoma [33], and the U373 glioblastoma [30, 31]. The growth inhibitory effects induced by compounds 16 on these six cancer cell lines were determined by means of the MTT colorimetric assay as detailed previously [2935].

StructureSponge speciesSite

Sarcotragus spinosulus Schmidt, 1862Tabarka
Sarcotragus fasciculatus (Pallas, 1766)Monastir
Sarcotragus fasciculatus (Pallas, 1766)Monastir
Sarcotragus spinosulus Schmidt, 1862Monastir
Sarcotragus spinosulus Schmidt, 1862Tabarka
Sarcotragus foetidus Schmidt, 1862Bizerte

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Experimental Procedures

NMR experiments were recorded at ICB-NMR Service Centre on a DRX 600 MHz Bruker spectrometer equipped with a TXI CryoProbe, on a Bruker Avance-400 spectrometer using an inverse probe fitted with a gradient along the -axis, and on a Bruker DPX-300 spectrometer. The NMR spectra were acquired in CDCl3 and in CD3OD. ESIMS and HRESIMS spectra were measured on a Micromass Q-TOF Microspectrometer coupled with HPLC Waters Alliance 2695. The instrument was calibrated by using a PEG mixture from 200 to 1000 MW. Optical rotations were measured using a Jasco DIP 370 digital spectropolarimeter. Analytical and preparative TLC were performed on precoated silica gel plates (Merck Kieselgel 60 F254, 0.2 mm and 0.5 mm), with detection provided by UV light (254 nm) and by spraying with ceric sulfate (CeSO4) reagent followed by heating (120°C). Silica gel column chromatography was performed using Merck Kieselgel 60 powder whereas size-exclusion chromatography was achieved on Sephadex LH-20 column.

2.2. Sponge Material and Taxonomic Identification

Four samples of three irciniid sponge species were collected by using SCUBA diving at a depth of about 15 m from three different sites along the coast of Tunisia. In particular, S. spinosulus was collected from Tabarka (36°58′3.65′′N, 8°45′53.89′′E) and Monastir (35°46′25.00′′N, 10°50′20.35′′E) in November 2010, S. fasciculatus (Pallas, 1766) was collected from Monastir in November 2010, while S. foetidus was collected from Cap Zebib (37°15′35.38′′N, 10°04′46.05′′E) in June 2011. The samples were kept frozen at −20°C until the extraction process. The colors of the samples were blackish for S. foetidus and S. spinosulus and red-brown for S. fasciculatus, with white-to-beige interior. The specimens were irregularly massive with a subspherical shape. The texture was resistant to tearing or cutting, with a firm and compressible consistency. The ectosome was thick and coarsely conulose. For taxonomic identification, sponge samples were preserved in 70% alcohol. Preparations of skeletons followed the standard practice proposed by Rützler [36]. The classification used in this work was that proposed by Hooper and van Soest [37], with the amendments given in the World Porifera Database [38]. The skeleton of the different species was a system of primary and secondary fibers that consists of laminated primary and secondary fibers and comprises numerous and fine spongin filaments. The diameter of primary fiber, secondary fiber, and spongin were, respectively, 100 μm, 30 μm, and 5 μm for S. foetidus; 80 μm, 40 μm, and 0.7 μm for S. fasciculatus; and 70 μm, 30 μm, and 2 μm for S. spinosulus.

2.3. Extraction and Purification

Each sponge sample was exhaustively extracted with acetone at room temperature. After evaporation of the solvent in vacuo, the remaining aqueous phases were separately partitioned between H2O and Et2O. The Et2O portions from each extraction were evaporated under reduced pressure affording the corresponding crude Et2O extracts.

A portion (2 g) of the Et2O extract (3 g) of S. spinosulus from Tabarka was first fractionated on Sephadex LH-20 column (CHCl3/MeOH, 1 : 1) to give a fraction containing ircinin 1 (1) and compound 5 as main metabolites. This fraction (546.0 mg) was then purified on silica gel column eluted with a gradient solvent system ranging from 100% to 20% light petroleum ether in Et2O to give pure compound 5 (33.8 mg) [39] and ircinin 1 [1, 53.1 mg; (, CHCl3); and (, MeOH)] [16, 40, 41].

The Et2O extract (846.6 mg) of S. spinosulus from Monastir was fractionated on silica gel column eluted with a gradient solvent system ranging from 100% to 20% of light petroleum ether in Et2O affording a fraction (57.4 mg) containing compound 4. An aliquot (15.2 mg) of this fraction was further purified on preparative TLC (light petroleum ether/Et2O, 1 : 1) obtaining 12 mg of pure compound 4 [39].

An aliquot (2 g) of Et2O extract (8 g) from S. fasciculatus collected off the coast of Monastir was first subjected to Sephadex LH-20 column (CHCl3/MeOH, 1 : 1) affording a major fraction (500 mg) which was purified on silica gel column eluted with a gradient solvent system ranging from 80% to 30% of light petroleum ether in Et2O. Two selected fractions (40 mg and 60 mg) from this column containing sarcotin A (2) [16, 42] and variabilin (3) [43, 44], respectively, were further subjected to preparative TLC purification to give pure 2 [15.5 mg; (, CHCl3); and (, MeOH)] and 3 [21.3 mg; (, CHCl3); and (, MeOH)].

The Et2O extract (61.6 mg) from S. foetidus was subjected to silica gel column eluted with a gradient solvent system ranging from 100% to 0% light petroleum ether in diethyl ether affording pure compound 6 (4.6 mg) [26].

All isolated compounds were identified by comparison of their spectral data (see Supplementary Material, available online at with the literature values [16, 26, 3944].

2.4. Determination of In Vitro Anticancer Activity

The cell lines that we used for the MTT colorimetric assay (Table 2) are five human and one murine cancer cell lines with the following histological types and origins. The human cancer cell lines include the A549 NSCLC (DSMZ code ACC107), the Hs683 oligodendroglioma (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) code HTB-138), the MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ) code ACC115), the SKMEL-28 melanoma (ATCC code HTB-72), and the U373 glioblastoma (European Collection of Cell Culture (ECACC) code 08061901) cell lines. The B16F10 mouse melanoma cell line (ATCC code CRL-6475) was obtained from the ATCC collection (Manassas, VA).

CompoundHumanMurineMean ± SEM

423273315112 ± 5
534455448423 ± 9
64541513 ± 1

GI50: in vitro concentration (M) needed to inhibit cell population growth by 50% after 72 hours of cell culture with the compound.

The cells were cultured in RPMI (Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) medium supplemented with 10% heat inactivated foetal calf serum (Lonza). All culture media were supplemented with 4 mM glutamine, 100 μg/mL gentamicin, and 200 U/mL penicillin and 200 μg/mL streptomycin (Lonza). The overall growth level of the human cancer cell lines was determined using a colorimetric MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl]-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, Sigma, Belgium) assay as detailed previously [2932]. Compounds 16 were dissolved in DMSO and redissolved in the cell culture media at a final concentration of 0.1%, which induces no observable toxic effects on cells. Six replicates of each experimental condition were performed. Thus, this procedure enables the concentration of compounds 16 that decreased by 50% the growth of each cell line (GI50 concentration) after having cultured it with the compound of interest for 72 h (the GI50 index in μM) to be determined.

3. Results

The chemical study of irciniid sponges collected along Tunisian coasts led to the isolation of the known FTAs ircinin 1 (1), sarcotin A (2), and variabilin (3), along with the known PHQs 46 (Table 1). The isolated compounds were identified by comparison with 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR, mass spectrometry, and optical rotation data available in the literature [16, 26, 3944].

Subsequently, we tested the in vitro growth inhibitory activities of the isolated natural products from irciniid sponges against six cancer cell lines and the obtained data are illustrated in Table 2.

All PHQs showed GI50 concentration <10 μM on MCF-7, SKMEL-28, and B16F10 cell lines, while just compound 6 displayed a homogeneous inhibitory pattern <10 μM on all 6 cell lines tested. Conversely, the three FTAs showed higher GI50 concentration, always >60 μM.

4. Discussion

Before proceeding to an interpretation of the data, we need to define when the compounds can be considered remarkably active with respect to the effects they produce on cancer cells. The GI50-related micromolar concentrations that define precisely the limits between “weakly active,” “active,” and “highly active” compounds in terms of growth inhibition are not following standardized rules in the literature. The instructions for authors of the Journal of Natural Products define as inactive a compound whose GI50 concentration is >10 μM. The US National Cancer Institute (NCI, Bethesda, MD) also tests for a given compound 10 μM as its higher potential growth inhibitory concentration. Consequently, if we refer to these criteria, among the studied compounds only compound 6 behaves actually as an inhibitor of cancer cell growth independently of the levels of sensitivity to proapoptotic stimuli of the various cancer cell lines under study.

On the other hand, compounds 4 and 5 showed a very similar pattern of growth inhibition with the most sensitive cell lines being MCF-7, SKMEL-28, and B16F10, while their growth inhibitory activity against the remaining three cell lines was about one magnitude weaker. This evidence seems to reflect the strong structural similarities among hepta- and octaprenylhydroquinones 4 and 5, which just differ by one isoprene unit (Table 1). In addition, the data in Table 2 clearly indicate that FTAs and PHQs display quite distinct profiles in terms of in vitro cancer growth inhibitory activity, differing by one to two orders of magnitude in favor of the PHQs in all cell lines. Although additional structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies are necessary for accurate identification of the structural features required for the activity of compound 6, our finding suggests that the presence of a hydroxyl group on the chain of 6 could be related to its enhanced growth inhibitory activity on cancer cells as compared to the nonhydroxylated 4 and 5. This finding, however, contrasts with earlier findings indicating less efficiency of 6 compared to 4 and 5 when tested against the chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cell line K562 [26]. This apparent discrepancy could mainly relate to the fact that Abed et al. [26] used one leukemia cell line growing in suspension, while we made use of six adherent cancer cell lines. As an example that we can cite among many others and thanks to the help provided by the NCI to characterize the mechanism of action of a novel fungal-related metabolite, that is, sphaeropsidin A, we observed that the leukemia cell lines from the NCI 60-cell line panel displayed markedly distinct profiles in terms of growth inhibition when compared, for example, to melanoma and kidney cancer cell lines [35]. The data from the current study clearly point to the fact that (i) compound 6 (and to a lesser extent compounds 4 and 5) markedly inhibits cancer cell growth and that (ii) the 6-induced growth inhibition in cancer cells is independent of the levels of resistance of the cancer cells (at least the models under study) to proapoptotic stimuli.

5. Conclusions

By comparing different metabolites isolated from sponges belonging to the genus Sarcotragus, our study evidenced higher in vitro growth inhibitory effects of PHQs on cancer cell lines, compared to FTAs. In addition, our results suggest, in spite of previous evidence reported in the literature, that compound 6 is the most active among the tested PHQs, inducing growth inhibition in cancer cells independent of their levels of resistance to proapoptotic stimuli. Consequently, 6 clearly deserves further in-depth analyses of its anticancer mechanism of action, toward its possible use to treat metastatic cancer.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Robert Kiss is a Director of Research with the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS, Belgium). Field sampling activities were supported by the project “MOTOX” (Modulation des Toxines Microbiennes et Biodegradation des Organismes Aquatiques) funded by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research and Technology of Information and Communication in Tunisia. Yosr BenRedjem Romdhane fellowship was funded by the INSTM.

Supplementary Materials

The Supplementary Material includes NMR and mass spectra of compounds 16, acquired using instruments and methods as described in the Materials and Methods section of the paper.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. P. Mehlen and A. Puisieux, “Metastasis: a question of life or death,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 449–458, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. Liu, C. J. Vivian, A. E. Brinker, K. R. Hampton, E. Lianidou, and D. R. Welch, “Microenvironmental influences on metastasis suppressor expression and function during a metastatic cell's journey,” Cancer Microenvironment, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 117–131, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Belaid, P. D. Ndiaye, H. Filippakis et al., “Autophagy: moving benchside promises to patient bedsides,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 684–702, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Z. Chen, T. Shi, L. Zhang et al., “Mammalian drug efflux transporters of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family in multidrug resistance: a review of the past decade,” Cancer Letters, vol. 370, no. 1, pp. 153–164, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Dinić, A. Podolski-Renić, T. Stanković, J. Banković, and M. Pešić, “New approaches with natural product drugs for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 21, no. 38, pp. 5589–5604, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. S. Sosa, P. Bragado, and J. A. Aguirre-Ghiso, “Mechanisms of disseminated cancer cell dormancy: an awakening field,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 611–622, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. M. Ghajar, “Metastasis prevention by targeting the dormant niche,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 238–247, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. Rycaj and D. G. Tang, “Cell-of-origin of cancer versus cancer stem cells: assays and interpretations,” Cancer Research, vol. 75, no. 19, pp. 4003–4011, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. R. Pattabiraman and R. A. Weinberg, “Tackling the cancer stem cells—what challenges do they pose?” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 497–512, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Berns and P. P. Pandolfi, “Tumor microenvironment revisited,” EMBO Reports, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 458–459, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. S. Karagiannis, T. Poutahidis, S. E. Erdman, R. Kirsch, R. H. Riddell, and E. P. Diamandis, “Cancer-associated fibroblasts drive the progression of metastasis through both paracrine and mechanical pressure on cancer tissue,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1403–1418, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Blazejczyk, D. Papiernik, K. Porshneva, J. Sadowska, and J. Wietrzyk, “Endothelium and cancer metastasis: perspectives for antimetastatic therapy,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 711–718, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. Dhani, A. Fyles, D. Hedley, and M. Milosevic, “The clinical significance of hypoxia in human cancers,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 110–121, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. D. Simpson, K. Anyiwe, and A. D. Schimmer, “Anoikis resistance and tumor metastasis,” Cancer Letters, vol. 272, no. 2, pp. 177–185, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Portt, G. Norman, C. Clapp, M. Greenwood, and M. T. Greenwood, “Anti-apoptosis and cell survival: a review,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1813, no. 1, pp. 238–259, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Liu, B. H. Bae, N. Alam et al., “New cytotoxic sesterterpenes from the sponge Sarcotragus species,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1301–1304, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Y. Liu, T. A. Mansoor, J. Hong et al., “New cytotoxic sesterterpenoids and norsesterterpenoids from two sponges of the genus Sarcotragus,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 1451–1456, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. J. Choi, Y. H. Choi, S.-B. Yee, E. Im, J. H. Jung, and N. D. Kim, “Ircinin-1 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in SK-MEL-2 human melanoma cells,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 162–173, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. Wang, J. Song, K. H. Jang et al., “Sesterterpenoids from the sponge Sarcotragus sp.,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 551–557, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. De Rosa, A. De Giulio, and C. Iodice, “Biological effects of prenylated hydroquinones: structure-activity relationship studies in antimicrobial, brine shrimp, and fish lethality assays,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1711–1716, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. B. Gil, M. Sanz, M. C. Terencio et al., “Effects of marine 2-polyprenyl-1,4-hydroquinones on phospholipase A2 activity and some inflammatory responses,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 285, no. 3, pp. 281–288, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L.-A. Tziveleka, A. P. Kourounakis, P. N. Kourounakis, V. Roussis, and C. Vagias, “Antioxidant potential of natural and synthesised polyprenylated hydroquinones,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 935–939, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Choi, J. Hong, C.-O. Lee et al., “Cytotoxic furanosesterterpenes from a marine sponge Psammocinia sp.,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 1186–1189, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. Mihopoulos, C. Vagias, I. Chinou et al., “Antibacterial and cytotoxic natural and synthesized hydroquinones from sponge Ircinia spinosula,” Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung—Section C, vol. 54, no. 5-6, pp. 417–423, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  25. W. Wätjen, A. Putz, Y. Chovolou et al., “Hexa-, hepta- and nonaprenylhydroquinones isolated from marine sponges Sarcotragus muscarum and Ircinia fasciculata inhibit NF-κB signalling in H4IIE cells,” The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 919–924, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Abed, N. Legrave, M. Dufies et al., “A new hydroxylated nonaprenylhydroquinone from the mediterranean marine sponge Sarcotragus spinosulus,” Marine Drugs, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1210–1219, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. K. Speirs, M. Hwang, S. Kim et al., “Harnessing the cell death pathway for targeted cancer treatment,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–61, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  28. A. Kornienko, V. Mathieu, S. K. Rastogi, F. Lefranc, and R. Kiss, “Therapeutic agents triggering nonapoptotic cancer cell death,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 4823–4839, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Dumont, L. Ingrassia, S. Rouzeau et al., “The amaryllidaceae isocarbostyril narciclasine induces apoptosis by activation of the death receptor and/or mitochondrial pathways in cancer cells but not in normal fibroblasts,” Neoplasia, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 766–776, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. Branle, F. Lefranc, I. Camby et al., “Evaluation of the efficiency of chemotherapy in in vivo orthotopic models of human glioma cells with and without 1p19q deletions and in C6 rat orthotopic allografts serving for the evaluation of surgery combined with chemotherapy,” Cancer, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 641–655, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. Lefranc, G. Nuzzo, N. A. Hamdy et al., “In vitro pharmacological and toxicological effects of norterpene peroxides isolated from the Red Sea sponge Diacarnus erythraeanus on normal and cancer cells,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 1541–1547, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. V. Mathieu, M. Le Mercier, N. De Neve et al., “Galectin-1 knockdown increases sensitivity to temozolomide in a B16F10 mouse metastatic melanoma model,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 127, no. 10, pp. 2399–2410, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. G. Van Goietsenoven, J. Hutton, J.-P. Becker et al., “Targeting of eEF1A with Amaryllidaceae isocarbostyrils as a strategy to combat melanomas,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 4575–4584, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Mathieu, M. Remmelink, N. D'Haene et al., “Development of a chemoresistant orthotopic human nonsmall cell lung carcinoma model in nude mice: analyses of tumor heterogeneity in relation to the immunohistochemical levels of expression of cyclooxygenase-2, ornithine decarboxylase, lung-related resistance protein, prostaglandin E synthetase, and glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-α, GST-μ, and GST-π,” Cancer, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 1908–1918, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. V. Mathieu, A. Chantôme, F. Lefranc et al., “Sphaeropsidin A shows promising activity against drug-resistant cancer cells by targeting regulatory volume increase,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 72, no. 19, pp. 3731–3746, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Rützler, “Sponges in coral reefs,” in Coral Reefs: Research Methods, D. R. Stoddart and R. E. Johannes, Eds., pp. 209–213, UNESCO, Paris, France, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  37. J. N. A. Hooper and R. W. M. van Soest, Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  38. R. W. M. van Soest, N. Boury-Esnault, J. N. A. Hooper et al., “World Porifera database,” 2016, View at: Google Scholar
  39. G. Cimino, S. De Stefano, and L. Minale, “Polyprenyl derivatives from the sponge Ircinia spinosula: 2-Polyprenylbenzoquinones, 2-polyprenylbenzoquinols, prenylated furans and a C-31 difuranoterpene,” Tetrahedron, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1315–1324, 1972. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. Cimino, S. De Stefano, L. Minale, and E. Fattorusso, “Ircinin-1 and -2, linear sesterterpenes from the marine sponge Ircinia oros,” Tetrahedron, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 333–341, 1972. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. J. Capon, T. R. Dargaville, and R. Davis, “The absolute stereochemistry of variabilin and related sesterterpene tetronic acids,” Natural Product Letters, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Y. Liu, J. Hong, C.-O. Lee et al., “Cytotoxic pyrrolo- and furanoterpenoids from the sponge Sarcotragus species,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1307–1314, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. D. J. Faulkner, “Variabilin, an antibiotic from the sponge, Ircinia variabilis,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 14, no. 39, pp. 3821–3822, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. Takabe, H. Hashimoto, H. Sugimoto, M. Nomoto, and H. Yoda, “First asymmetric synthesis of the marine furanosesterterpene natural product, (18S)-variabilin, employing enzymatic desymmetrization of propanediol derivatives,” Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 909–912, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Yosr BenRedjem Romdhane et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

898 Views | 313 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.