BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Application of Innovative Technologies for Improved Food Quality and Safety

View this Special Issue

Editorial | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 9160375 |

Yiannis Kourkoutas, Nikos Chorianopoulos, Aspasia Nisiotou, Vasilis P. Valdramidis, Kimon A. G. Karatzas, "Application of Innovative Technologies for Improved Food Quality and Safety", BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 9160375, 2 pages, 2016.

Application of Innovative Technologies for Improved Food Quality and Safety

Received09 Dec 2015
Accepted10 Dec 2015
Published04 Jan 2016

Nowadays, consumers in developed countries demand food products of high-quality, which are easy-to-handle, safe, and with natural flavor and color, as well as with an extended shelf life [1]. One of the most significant challenges in the food industry is to apply efficient technologies in the production chain to fulfill these demands. Major studies have introduced innovative technologies, such as nonthermal or alternative, quicker, and sensory-milder thermal methodologies [2]. Methods that are used today, such as packaging, application of antimicrobials (natural or chemicals), pasteurization, high pressure processing, or combinations of these technologies (hurdle technologies), have been widely explored and introduced applicable control tools in reducing bacterial contamination levels [1, 2].

In this respect, application of new discoveries in health-promoting food manufacture has been an intriguing and exciting topic of major public concern, while at the same time it confers multiple advantages in the industrial sector. In response to demands from increasingly health conscious consumers, the global new trend focuses on foods not only with superior sensory appeal but also of improved nutritional attributes. Current innovations in food production have resulted in the development of novel products with specific functional ingredients, reduction or removal of undesirable components, modification of food compositions, and overall improved quality and safety.

One of the main objectives of this special issue was to provide a number of documents to summarize new inventions, developments, and ideas in the most recent innovation opportunities and technological achievements in the production of foods with potent beneficial effects. In this context, the structural characteristics and antioxidant activities of soy protein isolate (SPI) dextran conjugates obtained by TiO2 photocatalysis treatment were explored. Results revealed that the UV-vis absorption and the fluorescence intensity increased with higher photocatalytic power. SPI-dextran conjugate was successfully formed by TiO2 photocatalysis treatment. Likewise, the effect of chitosan coating with cinnamon oil on the physiological attributes and preservation quality of China jujube fruits during storage was investigated. This investigation revealed that the complex coating of chitosan and cinnamon oil could directly control disease decay and maintained the good sensory acceptability of jujube fruits. Moreover, during storage time, the treatment of chitosan-oil coating might maintain the quality attributes and induce the defense reaction system of jujube fruits.

A universal approach based on “omics” technologies for the quality control of food was fully discussed. Up-to-date technologies based on digital information systems such as web platforms and smartphone applications, can facilitate the adoption of molecular labelling. In this respect, recent smartphone “apps” are becoming a powerful tool to promote the consumption of high-quality foodstuffs and in particular the consumption of those food items able to prevent diseases [36]. Such informative tools (including online portals and dissemination web sites) can be useful for different stakeholders to translate a molecular label based on “omics” in a more understandable language for the whole category of consumers.

An overview of current and new approaches in genetically modified organisms detection was also assumed. Furthermore, the benefits and drawbacks of such methodologies were discussed, too. In addition, a protocol was validated and determined to be suitable for practical use in monitoring and identifying genetically modified rice. The results indicated that the established methodology is convenient, rapid, and of low-cost for routine detection of genetically modified rice.

Finally, nanotechnology has proven its competence in almost all possible fields to food and agricultural systems [79]. Hence, a summary of the different methods of food processing, packaging, and preservation techniques is provided and the role of nanotechnology in the food processing, packaging, and preservation industry is highlighted and assessed.

Yiannis Kourkoutas
Nikos Chorianopoulos
Aspasia Nisiotou
Vasilis P. Valdramidis
Kimon A. G. Karatzas


  1. J. H. Chen, Y. Ren, J. Seow, T. Liu, W. S. Bang, and H. G. Yuk, “Intervention technologies for ensuring microbiological safety of meat: current and future trends,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 119–132, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. Aymerich, P. A. Picouet, and J. M. Monfort, “Decontamination technologies for meat products,” Meat Science, vol. 78, no. 1-2, pp. 114–129, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. L. Casperson, J. Sieling, J. Moon, L. Johnson, J. N. Roemmich, and L. Whigham, “A mobile phone food record app to digitally capture dietary intake for adolescents in a free-living environment: usability study,” JMIR mHealth and uHealth, vol. 3, no. 1, article e30, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. J. Hutchesson, M. E. Rollo, R. Callister, and C. E. Collins, “Self-monitoring of dietary intake by young women: online food records completed on computer or smartphone are as accurate as paper-based food records but more acceptable,” Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 87–94, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Zhang, Q. Yu, B. Siddiquie, A. Divakaran, and H. Sawhney, “‘Snap-n-Eat’: food recognition and nutrition estimation on a smartphone,” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 525–533, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Behnke and S. Seo, “Using smartphone technology to assess the food safety practices of farmers’ market foodservice Employees,” Journal of Foodservice Business Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y.-J. Cho, C.-J. Kim, N. Kim, C.-T. Kim, and B. Park, “Some cases in applications of nanotechnology to food and agricultural systems,” Biochip Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 183–185, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. F. Graveland-Bikker and C. G. de Kruif, “Food nanotechnology,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 196–203, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. Farhang, “Nanotechnology and applications in food safety,” Global Issues in Food Science and Technology, vol. 22, pp. 401–410, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Yiannis Kourkoutas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles