Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 1436080, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1436080
Review Article

Novel Treponema pallidum Recombinant Antigens for Syphilis Diagnostics: Current Status and Future Prospects

Department of Laboratory Diagnostics of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Dermatoses, State Research Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Korolenko Street 3/6, Moscow 107076, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed to Dmitry Deryabin

Received 2 February 2017; Accepted 21 March 2017; Published 24 April 2017

Academic Editor: György Schneider

Copyright © 2017 Aleksey Kubanov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The recombinant protein technology considerably promoted the development of rapid and accurate treponema-specific laboratory diagnostics of syphilis infection. For the last ten years, the immunodominant recombinant inner membrane lipoproteins are proved to be sensitive and specific antigens for syphilis screening. However, the development of an enlarged T. pallidum antigen panel for diagnostics of early and late syphilis and differentiation of syphilis stages or cured syphilis remains as actual goal of multidisciplinary expertise. Current review revealed novel recombinant antigens: surface-exposed proteins, adhesins, and periplasmic and flagellar proteins, which are promising candidates for the improved syphilis serological diagnostics. The opportunities and limitations of diagnostic usage of these antigens are discussed and the criteria for selection of optimal antigens panel summarized.

1. Treponema pallidum Biology

Treponema pallidum belongs to the family Spirochaetaceae, order Spirochaetales, phylum Spirochaetes, which is a phylogenetically ancient and distinct group of bacteria. Due to the cell structure, physiology, genetics, and pathogenic features T. pallidum is a very unusual microorganism [1].

T. pallidum is a Gram-negative spiral-shaped bacterium, which varies in length from 5 to 15 μm and is 0,20 μm in diameter. T. pallidum is covered with the outer membrane (OM), periplasmic space with endoflagella, peptidoglycan layer, and inner membrane (IM), which surrounds a cytoplasmic cylinder [2]. Three to six flagella extend in periplasmic space from both ends toward the centre of microorganism and determine the helical shape and characteristic corkscrew motility (rotating around longitudinal axis) of T. pallidum cells. This motility allows T. pallidum to permeate through membranous and gel-like substances and is important for T. pallidum invasion and dissemination during the syphilitic infection.

T. pallidum is a microaerophilic bacterium with an optimal growth temperature of 37°C and minimal metabolic capabilities. The microorganism is able to carry out glycolysis and interconversion of amino acids and fatty acids but lacks tricarboxylic acid cycle and alternative carbon sources pathways; de novo synthesis of amino acid, fatty acid, and nucleotides or enzyme cofactors synthesis pathways are also absent [3]. As a result, T. pallidum utilizes most of the essential molecules and substrates from the host environment using numerous specific transporters and does not survive outside the mammalian host [4]. T. pallidum is a strictly extracellular pathogen, which is in a direct contact with the humoral and cellular immunity mechanisms and therefore can evade elimination and migrate into the immunologically privileged tissues of the host organism.

In fact, fastidious nature of this bacterium is a probable result of its long-term evolution and adaptation to the host environment [5], and that made T. pallidum one of the most dangerous human pathogens since 1495 till the development of antibiotic therapy.

2. Treponema pallidum Genome

A reference strain of T. pallidum subsp. pallidum is Nichols, which was isolated in 1912 from the cerebrospinal fluid of syphilitic patient in Washington DC and then was cultivated in rabbit testes. The novel reference strain, which is phenotypically distinct from Nichols stain, is Street Strain 14 (SS14), isolated for the first time in 1977 in Atlanta from the skin lesion of a patient with secondary syphilis.

In 1998 T. pallidum Nichols strain became one of the first annotated bacterial genomes using Sanger sequencing [6]. In 2008, the genome of the SS14 strain was sequenced by an oligonucleotide array [7]. In 2013 both T. pallidum Nichols and SS14 strains were resequenced using next-generation sequencing, and that considerably improved the genome annotation [8].

The genome assembly showed a single circular chromosome of 1,138,006 bp or 1,139,633 bp with a G + C base composition of 52.8% and a total of 1,041 or 1,039 predicted open reading frames (ORFs) in Nichols and SS14 strains, respectively. About 5% of T. pallidum genes are specific to the family Spirochaetaceae, whereas most of them are genus- and species-specific. Of the 1,041 ORFs in T. pallidum Nichols strain, only 577 (55% of total) have predicted biologic functions based on sequence similarities, while 177 ORFs (17%) match hypothetical proteins and 287 ORFs (28%) have no database match and may be novel genes. Among the 1,039 ORFs in genome of T. pallidum SS14 strain, functions of 444 genes (43%) were not determined also [9]. Recently, the function of 207 hypothetical proteins was predicted using sequence- and structure-based method and was hypothesized for more 237 genes.

In summary, these results showed one of the smallest bacterial genomes (only few intracellular pathogenic species have a smaller genome) and greatly stimulated the study of this uncultivable in vitro bacterium [10].

3. Treponema pallidum Proteome

The identification of T. pallidum proteins began in 1975 with the application of electrophoretic techniques. Based on the SDS-PAGE results the T. pallidum protein pattern was described and the nomenclature was firstly standardized [11]. This format consists of the prefix TpN (for T. pallidum Nichols strain) followed by a consensus relative molecular mass value. Further, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE) technique significantly improved T. pallidum proteome research.

In a prominent study of McGill et al. [12] 2DGE was used for T. pallidum Nichols strain analyses, which in accordance with amino acid sequence data showed highly expressed proteins. In spite of more than 1000 expected proteins only 148 spots that represented 88 polypeptides were identified by their relative positions in 2DGE patterns, which were high-level expressed genes products.

A recent T. pallidum proteome characterization using complementary mass spectrometry technique revealed 557 unique proteins at a high level of confidence, including 106 items firstly accounted at the protein level [13]. These data provide most valuable insights into in vivo T. pallidum protein expression representing 54% of the predicted proteome.

The unusual feature of the T. pallidum proteome subcellular location was an extremely low density of proteins located in the outer membrane (approximately 1% of the number found in the E. coli outer membrane) [14]. OM proteins include the species-specific family of 12 T. pallidum repeat (Tpr) proteins, and some of them were predicted to be involved in membrane permeability. Other surface-exposed proteins were firstly designated as Treponema spp. rare outer membrane proteins (TROMPs), while newly identified OM proteins began to denote Tp prefix followed by ORF number in T. pallidum genome (e.g., Tp0326, Tp0453), and this format is now the most common.

Located in periplasmic space flagellar proteins (traditionally denoted as Fla) are widely presented in T. pallidum proteome, namely, FlaB1, FlaB2, and FlaB3 proteins of the spiral filament inner core covered with FlaA protein of the outer sheath, complemented with hook-associated and IM located complex of flagellar motor proteins that are typical for Spirochaetaceae family [15].

A recent analysis of the T. pallidum proteome predicted the presence of a large number of lipoproteins and also a high-level expression of lipoprotein genes [16]. Most of them are located in the inner membrane, where they play a role in nutrient reception and transport or have unpredicted functions.

A proposed allocation of T. pallidum proteins in treponemal cell membrane is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Topological model of T. pallidum seroreactive (lipo)proteins proposed localization.

4. Treponema pallidum Immunoproteome

The set of proteins, which induced immune response in the host and showed reactivity with sera from syphilis patients, was termed as T. pallidum immunoproteome. In prominent Brinkman et al. [17] and McGill et al. [12] studies that investigated protein expression library and T. pallidum strain Nichols proteins extracted from testicular tissue of infected rabbits, respectively, only 34–38 reactive antigens were detected. There is no complete identity between these sets of proteins (Figure 2), however principal proteins matched together.

Figure 2: T. pallidum proteins, which exhibit immunoreactivity with serum from syphilis patients in Brinkman et al. 2006 (recombinant protein ELISA) and McGill et al. 2010 (2D-PAGE immunoblotting) proteome research. Bold indicates proteins discussed in the present review.

Firstly, some inner membrane lipoproteins were typically reactive with sera from patients at all stages of syphilis, and this subset of seroreactive antigens strictly correlates with Brinkman et al. and McGill et al. immunoproteome studies. Despite the fact that lipoproteins are not exposed on the bacterial surface and are preliminarily located in IM, they are able to induce the high-level immune response, so these were the antigens to use for syphilis diagnostics, and that significantly developed the treponema-specific serological tests.

Secondly, few surface-located antigens were revealed in T. pallidum immunoproteome, and that reflects the extremely low density of proteins in the outer membrane of this microorganism. The small number of these potential targets limits the overall detection of the spirochete and allows the pathogen to evade the host immune system, giving its name a “stealth” pathogen [18]. This subset differ in Brinkman et al. and McGill et al. immunoproteome studies, and still OM proteins play a significant role in the outer membrane permeability and adhesion to biopolymers and T. pallidum antigenic variability, and that determines current interest to their role in pathogenicity and their diagnostical use.

Taken together, the immunoproteome data suggest the low T. pallidum immunogenicity and also allow specifying the most promising antigens for syphilis diagnostics.

5. Treponema pallidum Recombinant Lipoproteins as a Source for Sensitive and Specific Serological Diagnostics of Syphilis

The initial treponema-specific tests (i.e., assays for detection of specific antibodies) used native or sonically disrupted T. pallidum cells as the source of total number of antigens for the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorbance test, T. pallidum particle agglutination, and T. pallidum hemagglutination assay [19]; however, this approach was very complicated and expensive due to the inability of T. pallidum to be cultured in vitro.

Recently the recombinant protein technology promoted considerably the development of treponema-specific laboratory diagnostics [20]. Most typically the T. pallidum DNA derived from Nichols strain genome is amplified by PCR and inserted into an expression vector and then to Escherichia coli cells for expression of fusion proteins with a tag sequence for efficient chromatography purification. Then obtained recombinant proteins were tested as antigens in either enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or Western blot (WB) format. This approach greatly changed the knowledge of syphilis immunology and together with immunoproteome research led to the selection of optimal antigen combinations for T. pallidum serological detection [21].

Several strong immunogenic antigens that induced a high antibody response during syphilis infection and are not cross-reactive with serum from patients with other spirochetal diseases have been identified. In this set the 15 kDa lipoprotein (Tp15; tp0171 gene product) and the major outer membrane 17 kDa lipoprotein (Tp17; tp0435 gene product) are the key members [22]. At the moment the function of Tp15 is still unknown, while Tp17 is characterized as an eight-stranded β-barrel protein with a shallow “basin” at one end of the barrel and an α-helix stacked on the opposite end [23], which probably plays a role in either protein ligand binding, treponemal membrane architecture maintenance [24], or syphilis pathogenesis by activation of the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), E-selectin, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) genes in endothelial cells [25]. Another strong immunogen is 47 kDa lipoprotein (Tp47; tp0574 gene product) which is a carboxypeptidase (major T. pallidum penicillin-binding protein) [26] and plays a role in host-pathogen interaction via stimulation of microvessel endothelial cells to synthesize intercellular adhesion molecule and via induction of vascular cell adhesion molecule [27].

The early syphilis diagnostics were based on a single recombinant antigen, where sensitivities and specificities of Tp15, Tp17, and Tp47 were 100% and 96%; 100% and 100%; 100% and 20%, respectively [28], while assays with two or three antigen combinations resulted in the improvement of diagnostic assay [29]. Further an artificial fusion lipoprotein Tp15-Tp17-Tp47 was established as an instrument for rapid, simple, and convenient syphilis serological screening in the clinical setting using diagnostic ELISA method [30] or miniaturized protein biochip technique [31].

In some other studies the subset of recombinant lipoproteins, which induce the strongest antibody response and are currently used in T. pallidum diagnostic tests, includes 44.5 kDa lipoprotein (TmpA; tp0768 gene product) [32] and chimeric E. coli expressed Tpp15-Tpp17-Tp44.5-Tp47 antigen (Meridian Life Science, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee USA). More rarely the recombinant products of tp0319 gene (TmpC, 35 kDa purine nucleoside receptor lipoprotein) [33] and tp0684 gene (MglB-2, methylgalactoside ABC transporter, 41 kDa homolog of galactose/glucose-binding lipoprotein) [34] are also used [35, 36] preliminarily in Western blot assay as a combination of these immunogenic antigens [37] and are proved to be highly sensitive and specific for acquired syphilis.

In recent observation the Tp32 lipoprotein (tp0821 gene product) was characterized as L-methionine-binding lipoprotein localized in T. pallidum inner membrane [38]. Despite the fact that this protein was low reactive in Brinkman et al. immunoproteome study [17] and was not detectably reactive in McGill et al. study [12] the serological tests based on Tp0821 showed 91,0% and 98,3% positive rates of the IgM ELISA and the IgG ELISA, respectively, which correlated with the results of other treponemal tests [38]. The specificity was 94,3–100% when Tp0821 immunoassay was cross-checking with serum samples obtained from 30 patients with Lyme disease, 5 patients with leptospirosis, and 52 uninfected controls. According to these data the authors indicated Tp0821 as a new diagnostic antigen that requires further verification and confirmation.

In summary, treponema-specific tests based on the technology of recombinant lipoproteins significantly improved the diagnostics of syphilis providing an excellent 95–99% sensitivity and specificity of serological assays, being less effective in early and late stages of syphilis diagnostics [21] and in estimating the effect of therapy. Also, they do not distinguish between disease stages, while immunoproteome researches indicate the possibility of differential immune response to certain T. pallidum antigens during infection. Thus, the development of enlarged recombinant antigen panel for T. pallidum detection remains as actual goal of multidisciplinary molecular biology, microbiology, and immunology research [39].

6. Surface-Exposed Treponema pallidum Proteins for Improved Serological Diagnostics of Syphilis

The OM proteins are the most important immunological targets due to their availability in intact T. pallidum cells; however, they are rare compounds. In Cox et al. study [14] only 17 candidates for OM proteins were identified: 7 members of the Tpr family, 9 non-Tpr hypothetical proteins, and TP0326 (Tp92).

The specific T. pallidum repeat (Tpr) family of proteins includes 12 members, which can be divided into three subfamilies [40]. Subfamily I includes genes tprC, tprD, tprI, and tprF; and subfamily II includes genes tprE, tprG, and tprJ which encode products with common N- and C-termini flanking central domains that differ in sequence and length, while less homologic subfamily III (tprA, tprB, tprH, tprK, and tprL) differs in variable regions. Subfamily I Tpr proteins [41] possess a conserved sequence at the N- and C-termini and central regions and are predicted to be located in the outer membrane and involved in membrane permeability. For example, the TprC/D (Tp0117/0131) and TprI [42] are proposed to be trimeric, pore-forming proteins with identical β-barrels and N-terminal periplasmic domains that directly or indirectly link the barrels to the peptidoglycan layer (Figure 1). An extensively studied TprK (tp0897) of the III subfamily genes undergoes variation of seven variable regions (V1–V7) by nonreciprocal recombination with a large repertoire of “donor sites” to generate new mosaic proteins [43]. Because the V regions are recognized as the significant targets of the humoral immune response, it can be considered that immune selection of new TprK variants is a mechanism for “antigenic shift” of T. pallidum immune evasion and persistence [44].

Surprisingly, despite the strong antibody and T-cell responses against the N-terminal conserved region of the subfamily I Tpr proteins and TprK protein, the Tpr proteins were not indicated as seroreactive in both Brinkman et al. and McGill et al. immunoproteome researches [12, 17]. Probably, this may be determined by the above-described Tpr proteins variability, since TprK sequences differ substantially between and within individual strains, and, as a result, patients often contain multiple T. pallidum clones expressing different variants of the tprK gene [45]. According to these facts the Tpr family is hypothesized to be essential for T. pallidum pathogenesis and evasion from the host immune system, making it a longstanding objective to further vaccine research but limiting its importance as diagnostic antigens.

The group of non-Tpr surface-exposed treponema rare outer membrane proteins, designated as TROMPs, includes three members: TROMP-1 (31-kDa), TROMP-2 (28-kDa), and TROMP-3 (65-kDa) proteins. In previous studies [46] TROMPs were shown to be antigenic when tested with serum from infected rabbits and humans; however, in Brinkman et al. immunoproteome research [17] TROMP-2 (FlaA homolog, tp0663 gene product) was only reactive with sera from primary-syphilis patients, and in McGill et al. study [12] this protein was identified in T. pallidum proteome by 2DGE-MS phoresis but was not found to be reactive with human sera in immunoblot analysis. Recently, recombinant Tp0663 protein was confirmed to be a new serodiagnostic candidate antigen, which was extremely sensitive (98.83%) and specific (100%) for the detection of all stages of the syphilis infection [47].

Another surface-exposed Tp0326 protein (Tp92; tp0326 gene product) was described by Cameron et al. [48], using a differential screening strategy to identify E. coli clones expressing T. pallidum opsonic targets, and later it was characterized as BamA (β-barrel assembly machinery protein A) ortholog with the sequence homology to a known Gram-negative family of highly conserved β-barrel compounds [49]. Structural modeling of Tp0326 predicted five polypeptide transport-associated (POTRA) domains in the N-terminus and 18-stranded amphipathic β-barrel in the C-terminus, which are responsible for the native protein’s amphiphilicity [50] (Figure 1). According to Kenedy et al. study related to Tp0326 protein BB0795 of Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease spirochete) its function is essential for the assembly of OM proteins [51]. Tp0326 is seroreactive in Brinkman et al. immunoproteome [17], while it did not exhibit reactivity with early latent syphilis sera and did not show immunogenicity in McGill et al. study [12]. This observation can be explained by extremely low level of Tp0326 expression in T. pallidum proteome as variation in the antibody responses to POTRA and β-barrel portions of this antigen. Surprisingly, T. pallidum infected rabbits exhibited an antibody response to both antigenic epitopes, whereas humans with secondary syphilis respond to POTRA only [49]. Recently, Luthra et al. [50] showed that only the β-barrel domain of Tp0326 contains surface-exposed epitopes in intact T. pallidum and identified an immunodominant large L4 extracellular loop. Based on these results the syphilis diagnostic tests and kits based on Tp0326 recombinant protein, its combination with Tp0453 antigen, and Tp0326-0453 chimeric fusions were developed [52].

Tp0453 (tp0453 gene product) is a 287 a.a. protein (putative lipoprotein) associated with the inner surface of T. pallidum outer membrane (Figure 1). In Hazlett et al. study [53] this nonlipidated variant of the protein exhibited extensive β-sheet structure and amphipathic α-helices, whereby when added to artificial bilayers it showed multiple membrane inserting and enhanced the membrane permeability, suggesting being a porin. More recently, the 3D crystal structure of Tp0453 has been solved. It consists of a α/β/α-fold and includes five stably folded amphipathic helices, which are crucial for Tp0453 integration into the membrane [54]. Based on structural dynamics and Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoproteins’ comparison data, Tp0453 was proposed to be a carrier of lipids and glycolipids during outer membrane biogenesis. Resuming, Tp0453 is hypothesized to be a novel type of bacterial outer membrane protein, which may render the T. pallidum outer membrane permeability to nutrients while remaining inaccessible to antibodies.

Tp0453 is not seroreactive in Brinkman et al. immunoproteome research [17], but in McGill et al. study it showed a moderate seroreactivity and was found to be preliminarily reactive with sera from primary-syphilis patients [12]. This observation correlated with Van Voorhis et al. data [55], which exhibited 100% specificity and sensitivity for Tp0453 in reaction with syphilis patients’ sera, giving negative result with relapsing-fever, Lyme disease, or leptospirosis patients’ sera. Recently, the methods of producing soluble recombinant Tp0453 via expression in pET28a vector were developed and kits including the soluble and solid substrates, containing Tp0453 protein, are also provided. The development of ELISA method using Tp0453 recombinant products and chimeric Tp0453-Tp0326 proteins as diagnostic antigens are reported. The sensitivities of Tp0453 and the Tp0453-Tp0326 chimera were found to be 98% and 98%, respectively, and the specificities were 100% and 99%, respectively, which characterized these proteins as novel candidate antigens for treponema-specific serological diagnostics [52]. Now Tp0453 together with conventional Tp15, Tp17, Tp47, TmpA, and novel Tp0257 (Gpd) antigens is included into the panel of commercially available WB kit Recom Blot Treponema IgG/IgM 2.0 (Mikrogen GmbH, Germany).

7. Novel Treponema pallidum Derived Recombinant Products: Adhesins and Periplasmic and Flagellar Proteins—Opportunities and Limitations

Tp0155 and Tp0483 were predicted as two putative adhesins of the T. pallidum genome and then demonstrated specific attachment to fibronectin and blockage of a bacterial adherence to fibronectin-coated slides [56]. Interestingly, Tp0155 preferentially binds to the matrix form of fibronectin, whereas Tp0483 binds to both the soluble and matrix forms, which exist in different conformational forms with cryptic epitopes becoming exposed during fibronectin matrix assembly. Recently Tp0155 was described as a protein comprising a leader peptide, two N-terminal LysM domains, which recognize carbohydrate polymers, and M23 peptidase sequence, which makes this protein able to degrade peptidoglycan and exhibit the enzymatic activity [57]. In turn, the analyses of Tp0483 outer membrane protein revealed two fibronectin binding regions between 274–289 and 316–333 amino acids residues [58]. In addition to the adhesive and enzymatic functions both T. pallidum proteins induce production of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α in macrophages, and that is associated with the activation of NF-κB [59].

Surprisingly, these proteins were not seroreactive in immunoproteome researches, and in comparative study with Gpd both Tp0155 and Tp0483 [55] gave positive result with only 9% of syphilis patient sera, and all of these reactive sera were from the individuals with early primary infection.

Tp0136 is 485 a.a., 49 kDa hypothetical protein/lipoprotein exposed on the T. pallidum outer membrane. The recombinant protein study revealed the ability to bind fibronectin and laminin glycoproteins, which involved Tp0136 attached to the host extracellular matrix components [60]. Recently it was shown that Tp0136 adheres more efficiently to cellular than to plasma fibronectin via its N-terminal conserved region [61]. Additionally, Tp0136 is highly transcribed during an experimental infection in parallel with the host immune response to the pathogen, which suggests a possible role for this protein in T. pallidum persistence.

TP0136 is not reactive in McGill et al. proteome; however in Brinkman et al. study this protein exhibits reactivity to human sera compared to rabbit sera [17] preliminarily with primary-syphilis stage. Recently, the Tp0136 selective fragment (Tp0136B) with a molecular weight of about 28 kDa was tested with sera from primary-syphilis patients, and the positive result was shown in 85.5% of cases [62].

Tp0751 firstly was described as 237 a.a., 25,8 kDa protein and then was identified as T. pallidum laminin-binding adhesin [63], which is crucial for pathogen dissemination in the host organism due to the attachment to the extracellular matrix component laminin—major glycoprotein found within mammalian basement membrane. The laminin-binding region in Tp0751 is limited to 10-amino acid fragment, and this motif inhibited the attachment of T. pallidum to laminin, as well as Tp0751-specific antibodies inhibit the attachment of T. pallidum to laminin too. Further studies showed the Tp0751 bifunctionality including fibrin clot degradation capability and characterized this molecule as the treponemal metalloprotease pallilysin [64]. Cotranscribed protein Tp0750 was described as a serine protease, which degrades major clot components (fibrinogen and fibronectin) [65], and was hypothesized to work in cooperation with Tp0751 and together to play a role in T. pallidum invasion and dissemination in the host organism.

Despite the significance for T. pallidum pathogenicity, Tp0751 is not seroreactive in both abovementioned immunoproteome researches, while Tp0750 exhibited a week seroreactivity in Brinkman et al. study with sera from primary and early latent syphilis [17]. Finally, in comparative studies Tp0751 revealed lower seroreactivity than Tp0257 (Gpd) and Tp1038 (TpF1) [55]. However, being limited for diagnostic use, the Tp0751 protein showed good immunoprotective properties, allowing it to be considered as a promising syphilis vaccine candidate [66].

Firstly Tp0257 protein was identified as a potential immunoreactive antigen using a differential immunologic expression library screening. According to the results of nucleotide sequence analysis this protein was demonstrated to be the 356-residue homologue of glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase (Gpd) [67], an enzyme, that hydrolyzes deacylated phospholipids to alcohol and glycerol-3-phosphate, previously identified in Haemophilus influenzae, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Borrelia hermsii. The characterization of the recombinant protein Tp0257 showed its bifunctionality, revealing both the enzymatic activity and the capability of binding the Fc-fragment of human IgA, IgD, and IgG immunoglobulins [68]. Initially Tp0257 was predicted to be lipid-modified, associated with the outer membrane and surface exposed, and thus this protein was supposed to play a role in enabling the T. pallidum to evade the immune response limiting the antibodies’ cytotoxic and opsonic capacities (like its homolog in H. influenzae). However, in further analysis it turned to have a subsurface localization (like its homolog in E. coli), where substantial portion of this periplasmic polypeptide is associated with peptidoglycan layer.

In Brinkman et al. immunoproteome [17] Tp0257 was reactive with sera from primary, secondary, and early latent syphilis patients but was not detected by 2DGE immunoblotting method in McGill et al. study [12]. There are few data about the diagnostic capacities of recombinant Tp0257 in syphilis serology as an included antigen together with Tp0453 [55].

Tp1038 (TpF1, antigen 4D, antigen C1–5) is homodecamer comprising 12 identical 19-kDa subunits linked by disulfide bonds, which form a nearly spherical shell [69]. This protein plays a role in iron uptake and functionally belongs to bacterioferritins’ group. Moreover, Tp1038 plays a pivotal role in driving an immune response by activation of inflammasome, promoting the development of regulatory T-cells, modulating the release of specific cytokines by monocytes, and stimulating an angiogenesis that is typically observed during secondary syphilis [70].

Tp1038 is seroreactive in Brinkman et al. immunoproteome [17] study with sera from early latent syphilis, whereas in McGill et al. study [12] oligomeric form of this antigen exhibited high antibody responses with all stages of syphilis while it did not exhibit serologic reactivity against the monomeric form. Currently this antigen has shown a high sensitivity (93.3–100%) for the detection of all stages of syphilis and was extremely specific (100%) when tested against potentially cross-reactive sera, and that proposes Tp1038 to be a promising candidate for the screening of syphilis [71].

Flagellar proteins form a significant part of T. pallidum proteome being represented by Tp0868 (FlaB1, 34.5 kDa), Tp0792 (FlaB2, 33 kDa), and Tp0870 (FlaB3, 31 kDa) filament core proteins covered with Tp0249 (FlaA1) sheath protein, also complemented with hook-basal body complex proteins (Tp0398 and Tp0727) and flagellar motor proteins (Tp0400) [72]. Now it is hypothesized that Tp0249 (FlaA1) protein is in a contact with Tp0663 (FlaA2), localized in the inner membrane, and designated as Tromp2 also. These proteins provide a characteristic corkscrew motility, which is significant for T. pallidum invasion and dissemination in the host organism.

The hook-basal body complex proteins Tp0398 and Tp0727 are seroreactive in Brinkman et al. immunoproteome [17], while in McGill et al. study [12] a number of proteins, namely, Tp0249, Tp0868, Tp0792, and Tp0870 (FlaA, FlaB1, FlaB2, and FlaB3, resp.), and flagellar motor protein Tp0400 (FliG), were highly seroreactive at all stages of syphilis. In early researches some cross-reactions of T. pallidum flagellar proteins with a number of proteins of distantly related spirochaetes were observed [73], and that restricted their diagnostic significance. Recently, a screening of recombinant flagellar proteins showed that FlaB1, FlaB2, and FlaB3 revealed higher overall sensitivity and specificity for IgG antibody with 95.4% and 98.9%; 92.6% and 95.8%; 95.1% and 95.8%, respectively [74]. In addition, FlaB1, FlaB2, and FlaB3 proteins demonstrated an excellent performance for detecting IgM antibody in primary and congenital syphilis, with sensitivity and specificity of 76.8% and 83.1%; 72.0% and 87.7%; 74.4% and 89.2%, respectively. These results put FlaB1, FlaB2, and FlaB3 proteins into the group of novel candidate antigens for syphilis serodiagnostics.

Thus, current studies (summarized in Table 1) show both opportunities and limitations of novel recombinant antigens of T. pallidum for the serological diagnostics of syphilis. Most typically some of these antigens (Tp0136, Tp0257, and Tp1038) are more useful for primary and early stages syphilis detection, while overall they are less sensitive (Tp0155, Tp0483, and Tp0751) or less specific (Tp0868, Tp0792, and Tp0870) than conventional immunodominant T. pallidum lipoproteins.

Table 1: T. pallidum proteins used and proposed for syphilis serological diagnostics.

8. Future Directions in Treponema pallidum Recombinant Proteins Development

The recombinant protein technique can provide a significant quantity of highly purified T. pallidum antigens for diagnostic use. This led to great progress in a treponema-specific serological tests reliability based on the detection of antibodies against T. pallidum immunodominant lipoproteins Tp15, Tp17, Tp47, and some others. The modern “traditional” and “reverse” algorithm use this approach as the second- or the first-line tests, which are effective in most cases of syphilis diagnostics.

Remaining difficulties in syphilis serological screening are related to early forms (without expressed immune response) or late forms of this disease (when immune response decreases as a result of T. pallidum migration in the “immunologically privileged” niches). This situation makes it necessary to recruit new additional treponemal recombinant antigens that will be seroreactive in cases of ineffectiveness of immunodominant lipoproteins. For example, development of surface-exposed proteins Tp0326 (Tp92) and Tp0453 have increased sensitivity and specificity of serological tests to 98–100%, especially at primary syphilis stage.

Current research studies revealed numerous novel recombinant antigens, which are promising candidates for the improved syphilis serological diagnostics. However, ongoing studies showed the depletion of diagnostic antigens resource, where some novel products are less effective than conventional recombinant lipoproteins. The period of rapid progress in syphilis serodiagnostics development ended and each new success in this field requires a lot of experimental and clinical efforts.

On the other hand, the current syphilis laboratory diagnostics paradigm, which provides alternative diagnostic result (“yes” or “no”), significantly reduces the experimental research area, while the immunoproteome studies indicate greater possibilities for serological analyses compared to screening and confirmatory tests only. Changes in behavioral strategy of T. pallidum in the course of the disease determined by its interaction with the immune system and manifested in different proteins expression profiles may be a clue for the differentiation of syphilis stages based on detection of antibodies against these variable antigens. For example, some novel T. pallidum recombinant antigens (like Tp0136, Tp0155, Tp0483, and others) that are not reactive in all syphilis stages and in current paradigm are assessed as less effective for syphilis screening are promising candidates for new generation of immunotests with advanced diagnostic capabilities. In line with these expectations the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of antibody level against certain antigens may reveal a variable immune response (fingerprints) that is typical for different syphilis stages.

Another unresolved issue is the continued reactivity of modern conventional treponemal tests for a long time after the syphilis cure that determines their inefficiency for monitoring of the treatment response, relapse, or reinfection in previously treated patients. Currently this goal is achieved using the low-specific nontreponemal tests, which contrasts with the experience of the serological monitoring of other infectious diseases. In this context, the search for novel T. pallidum antigens, whose antibodies are rapidly eliminated from host blood flow after the pathogen’s eradication, is another promising direction in recombinant proteins’ development.

Thus, the development of enlarged panel of T. pallidum recombinant antigens remains an actual task of multidisciplinary biomedical research. The high-resolution methods (immunoblot or immunochip) and multicentral examination protocols allow determining the number of antigens in the panel with the following criteria: (i) detectable immunoreactivity; (ii) expression level on different syphilis stages; (iii) decreasing immune response after the infection regress. Scan of these recombinant antigens and their application for new aspects of syphilis serological diagnostics are the tasks of the future research studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a government contract of the Russian Ministry of Health (Project no. 114/BU-2015-051).

References

  1. S. J. Norris, D. L. Cox, and G. M. Weinstock, “Biology of Treponema pallidum: correlation of functional activities with genome sequence data,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37–62, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Liu, J. K. Howell, S. D. Bradley, Y. Zheng, Z. H. Zhou, and S. J. Norris, “Cellular architecture of Treponema pallidum: novel flagellum, periplasmic cone, and cell envelope as revealed by cryo electron tomography,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 403, no. 4, pp. 546–561, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. E. LaFond and S. A. Lukehart, “Biological basis for syphilis,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 29–49, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. W. Peeling and E. W. Hook III, “The pathogenesis of syphilis: The Great Mimicker, revisited,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 224–232, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. J. Mulligan, S. J. Norris, and S. A. Lukehart, “Molecular studies in Treponema pallidum evolution: toward clarity?” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 2, no. 1, article e184, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. M. Fraser, S. J. Norris, G. M. Weinstock et al., “Complete genome sequence of Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5375, pp. 375–388, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. Matějková, M. Strouhal, D. Šmajs et al., “Complete genome sequence of Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum strain SS14 determined with oligonucleotide arrays,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 8, article 76, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Pětrošová, P. Pospíšilová, M. Strouhal et al., “Resequencing of Treponema pallidumssp. pallidum strains Nichols and SS14: correction of sequencing errors resulted in increased separation of syphilis treponeme subclusters,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e74319, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. A. T. Naqvi, M. Shahbaaz, F. Ahmad, and M. I. Hassan, “Identification of functional candidates amongst hypothetical proteins of Treponema pallidumssp. Pallidum,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e0124177, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. J. Norris, G. M. Weinstock, and N. Steven J, “The genome sequence of Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete: will clinicians benefit?” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. J. Norris, “Polypeptides of Treponema pallidum: progress toward understanding their structural, functional, and immunologie roles,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 750–779, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. A. McGill, D. G. Edmondson, J. A. Carroll, R. G. Cook, R. S. Orkiszewski, and S. J. Norris, “Characterization and serologic analysis of the Treponema pallidum proteome,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 2631–2643, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. K. Osbak, S. Houston, K. V. Lithgow et al., “Characterizing the syphilis-causing Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum proteome using complementary mass spectrometry,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID e0004988, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. D. L. Cox, A. Luthra, S. Dunham-Ems et al., “Surface immunolabeling and consensus computational framework to identify candidate rare outer membrane proteins of Treponema pallidum,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 5178–5194, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Li, M. A. Motaleb, M. Sal, S. F. Goldstein, and N. W. Charon, “Spirochete piroplasmic flagella and motility,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 345–354, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. C. Setubal, M. Reis, J. Matsunaga, and D. A. Haake, “Lipoprotein computational prediction in spirochaetal genomes,” Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 113–121, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. B. Brinkman, M. McKevitt, M. McLoughlin et al., “Reactivity of antibodies from syphilis patients to a protein array representing the Treponema pallidum proteome,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 888–891, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. D. Radolf and D. C. Desrosiers, “Treponema pallidum, the stealth pathogen, changes, but how?: MicroCommentary,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1081–1086, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Hart, “Syphilis tests in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 368–376, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Gerber, S. Krell, and J. Morenz, “Recombinant Treponema pallidum antigens in syphilis serology,” Immunobiology, vol. 196, no. 5, pp. 535–549, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. J. Binnicker, D. J. Jespersen, and L. O. Rollins, “Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1313–1317, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. R. Chamberlain, M. E. Brandt, A. L. Erwin, J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard, “Major integral membrane protein immunogens of Treponema pallidum are proteolipids,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2872–2877, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. A. Brautigam, R. K. Deka, and M. V. Norgard, “Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of TP0435 (Tp17) from the syphilis spirochete Treponema pallidum,” Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 453–455, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. A. Brautigam, R. K. Deka, W. Z. Liu, and M. V. Norgard, “Insights into the potential function and membrane organization of the TP0435 (Tp17) lipoprotein from Treponema pallidum derived from structural and biophysical analyses,” Protein Science, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R.-L. Zhang, Q.-Q. Wang, J.-P. Zhang, and L.-J. Yang, “Tp17 membrane protein of Treponema pallidum activates endothelial cells in vitro,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 538–544, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. K. Deka, M. Machius, M. V. Norgard, and D. R. Tomchick, “Crystal structure of the 47-kDa lipoprotein of Treponema pallidum reveals a novel penicillin-binding protein,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 44, pp. 41857–41864, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. H. Lee, H.-J. Choi, M.-G. Lee, and J. B. Lee, “Virulent Treponema pallidum 47 kDa antigen regulates the expression of cell adhesion molecules and binding of T-lymphocytes to cultured human dermal microvascular endothelial cells,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 623–633, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. L. Backhouse and S. I. Nesteroff, “Treponema pallidum western blot: comparison with the FTA-ABS test as a confirmatory test for syphilis,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. V. Sambri, A. Marangoni, M. A. Simone, A. D'Antuono, M. Negosanti, and R. Cevenini, “Evaluation of recomWell Treponema, a novel recombinant antigen-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of syphilis,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 200–205, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. H. Sun, Y. F. Mao, Y. Hu, Q. Sun, and J. Yan, “Sensitive and specific ELISA coated by TpN15-TpN17-TpN47 fusion protein for detection of antibodies to Treponema pallidum,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 321–326, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N.-L. Huang, L. Ye, M. E. Schneider et al., “Development of a novel protein biochip enabling validation of immunological assays and detection of serum IgG and IgM antibodies against Treponema pallidum pathogens in the patients with syphilis,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 75, pp. 465–471, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. O. E. IJsselmuiden, L. M. Schouls, E. Stolz et al., “Sensitivity and specificity of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the recombinant DNA-derived Treponema pallidum protein TmpA for serodiagnosis of syphilis and the potential use of TmpA for assessing the effect of antibiotic therapy,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 152–157, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. K. Deka, C. A. Brautigam, X. F. Yang et al., “The PnrA (Tp0319; TmpC) lipoprotein represents a new family of bacterial purine nucleoside receptor encoded within an ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-like operon in Treponema pallidum,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 12, pp. 8072–8081, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. K. Deka, M. S. Goldberg, K. E. Hagman, and M. V. Norgard, “The Tp38 (TpMglB-2) lipoprotein binds glucose in a manner consistent with receptor function in Treponema pallidum,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 8, pp. 2303–2308, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Xiao, G. Guo, and M. Zeng, “Gene cloning and expression of outer membrane protein TP0684 of Treponema pallidum,” Chinese Journal of Biologicals, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 248–251, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Xiao, N. Wu, S. Liu, F. Zhao, and Y. Wu, “Expression and purification of Tp0319 recombinant protein of Treponema pallidum and its application in diagnosis of syphilis,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science, vol. 4, article 004, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  37. V. Sambri, A. Marangoni, C. Eyer et al., “Western immunoblotting with five Treponema pallidum recombinant antigens for serologic diagnosis of syphilis,” Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 534–539, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Y. Xie, M. Xu, C. Wang et al., “Diagnostic value of recombinant Tp0821 protein in serodiagnosis for syphilis,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 336–343, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. C. Seña, B. L. White, and P. F. Sparling, “Novel treponema pallidum serologic tests: a paradigm shift in syphilis screening for the 21st century,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 700–708, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. L. Giacani, K. Hevner, and A. Centurion-Lara, “Gene organization and transcriptional analysis of the tprJ, tprI, tprG, and tprF loci in Treponema pallidum strains Nichols and Sea 81-4,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 17, pp. 6084–6093, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. E. S. Sun, B. J. Molini, L. K. Barrett, A. Centurion-Lara, S. A. Lukehart, and W. C. Van Voorhis, “Subfamily I Treponema pallidum repeat protein family: sequence variation and immunity,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 725–737, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Anand, M. LeDoyt, C. Karanian et al., “Bipartite topology of Treponema pallidum repeat proteins C/D and I: outer membrane insertion, trimerization, and porin function require a C-Terminal β-barrel domain,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 290, no. 19, pp. 12313–12331, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. Centurion-Lara, R. E. LaFond, K. Hevner et al., “Gene conversion: a mechanism for generation of heterogeneity in the tprK gene of Treponema pallidum during infection,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1579–1596, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T. B. Reid, B. J. Molini, M. C. Fernandez, and S. A. Lukehart, “Antigenic variation of TprK facilitates development of secondary syphilis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 4959–4967, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. Heymans, M.-E. Kolader, J. J. Van Der Helm, R. A. Coutinho, and S. M. Bruisten, “TprK gene regions are not suitable for epidemiological syphilis typing,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 875–878, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. R. Blanco, J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett, “Surface antigens of the syphilis spirochete and their potential as virulence determinants,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Xu, Y. Xie, C. Jiang et al., “A novel ELISA using a recombinant outer membrane protein, rTp0663, as the antigen for serological diagnosis of syphilis,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 43, pp. 51–57, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. C. E. Cameron, S. A. Lukehart, C. Castro, B. Molini, C. Godornes, and W. C. Van Voorhis, “Opsonic potential, protective capacity, and sequence conservation of the Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum Tp92,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 1401–1413, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. D. C. Desrosiers, A. Anand, A. Luthra et al., “TP0326, a Treponema pallidumβ-barrel assembly machinery A (BamA) orthologue and rare outer membrane protein,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1496–1515, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Luthra, A. Anand, K. L. Hawley et al., “A homology model reveals novel structural features and an immunodominant surface loop/opsonic target in the Treponema pallidum BamA ortholog TP_0326,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 197, no. 11, pp. 1906–1920, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. R. Kenedy, T. R. Lenhart, and D. R. Akins, “The role of Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface proteins,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. B. C. Smith, Y. Simpson, M. G. Morshed et al., “New proteins for a new perspective on syphilis diagnosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. K. R. O. Hazlett, D. L. Cox, M. Decaffmeyer et al., “TP0453, a concealed outer membrane protein of Treponema pallidum, enhances membrane permeability,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 18, pp. 6499–6508, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Luthra, G. Zhu, D. C. Desrosiers et al., “The transition from closed to open conformation of Treponema pallidum outer membrane-associated lipoprotein TP0453 involves membrane sensing and integration by two amphipathic helices,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 48, pp. 41656–41668, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. W. C. Van Voorhis, L. K. Barrett, S. A. Lukehart, B. Schmidt, M. Schriefer, and C. E. Cameron, “Serodiagnosis of syphilis: antibodies to recombinant Tp0453, Tp92, and Gpd proteins are sensitive and specific indicators of infection by Treponema pallidum,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 3668–3674, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. C. E. Cameron, E. L. Brown, J. M. Y. Kuroiwa, L. M. Schnapp, and N. L. Brouwer, “Treponema pallidum fibronectin-binding proteins,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 20, pp. 7019–7022, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. C. V. Bamford, T. Francescutti, C. E. Cameron, H. F. Jenkinson, and D. Dymock, “Characterization of a novel family of fibronectin-binding proteins with M23 peptidase domains from Treponema denticola,” Molecular Oral Microbiology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 369–383, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. T. Dickerson, M. B. Abney, C. E. Cameron, M. Knecht, L. G. Bachas, and K. W. Anderson, “Fibronectin binding to the Treponema pallidum adhesin protein fragment rtp0483 on functionalized self-assembled monolayers,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 184–195, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. P. R. Qing, Treponema pallidum adhesion proteins Tp0155, Tp0483 induce macrophage product inflammatory cytokine via activation of NF-κB [M.S. thesis], 2011.
  60. M. B. Brinkman, M. A. McGill, J. Pettersson et al., “A novel Treponema pallidum antigen, TP0136, is an outer membrane protein that binds human fibronectin,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1848–1857, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. W. Ke, B. J. Molini, S. A. Lukehart, and L. Giacani, “Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum TP0136 protein is heterogeneous among isolates and binds cellular and plasma fibronectin via its NH2-terminal end,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e0003662, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. Yang, L. Shen, X.-X. Zhang, and Q. Sun, “Soluble expression, purification and characterization of recombinant Tp0136 selective fragment from Treponema pallidum,” Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 119–123, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. C. E. Cameron, J. M. Y. Kuroiwa, M. Yamada, T. Francescutti, B. Chi, and H. K. Kuramitsu, “Heterologous expression of the Treponema pallidum laminin-binding adhesin Tp0751 in the culturable spirochete Treponema phagedenis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 190, no. 7, pp. 2565–2571, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. Houston, R. Hof, T. Francescutti, A. Hawkes, M. J. Boulanger, and C. E. Cameron, “Bifunctional role of the Treponema pallidum extracellular matrix binding adhesin Tp0751,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 1386–1398, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. Houston, S. Russell, R. Hof et al., “The multifunctional role of the pallilysin-associated Treponema pallidum protein, Tp0750, in promoting fibrinolysis and extracellular matrix component degradation,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 618–634, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. K. V. Lithgow, R. Hof, C. Wetherell, D. Phillips, S. Houston, and C. E. Cameron, “A defined syphilis vaccine candidate inhibits dissemination of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, article 14273, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. C. E. Stebeck, J. M. Shaffer, T. W. Arroll, S. A. Lukehart, and W. C. Van Voorhis, “Identification of the Treponema pallidum subsp. Pallidum glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase bomologue,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 303–310, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. E. Cameron, C. Castro, S. A. Lukehart, and W. C. Van Voorhis, “Function and protective capacity of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum Glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 5763–5770, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. D. Radolf, L. A. Borenstein, J. Y. Kim, T. E. Fehniger, and M. A. Lovett, “Role of disulfide bonds in the oligomeric structure and protease resistance of recombinant and native Treponema pallidum surface antigen 4D,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 1365–1371, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. T. Pozzobon, N. Facchinello, F. Bossi et al., “Treponema pallidum (syphilis) antigen TpF1 induces angiogenesis through the activation of the IL-8 pathway,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 18785, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. C. Jiang, F. Zhao, J. Xiao et al., “Evaluation of the recombinant protein TpF1 of Treponema pallidum for serodiagnosis of syphilis,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1563–1568, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. Li, C. W. Wolgemuth, M. Marko, D. G. Morgan, and N. W. Charon, “Genetic analysis of spirochete flagellin proteins and their involvement in motility, filament assembly, and flagellar morphology,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 190, no. 16, pp. 5607–5615, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. S. J. Norris, “Polypeptides of Treponema pallidum: progress toward understanding their structural, functional, and immunologic roles. Treponema Pallidum Polypeptide Research Group,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 750–779, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. C. Jiang, J. Xiao, Y. Xie et al., “Evaluation of FlaB1, FlaB2, FlaB3, and Tp0463 of Treponema pallidum for serodiagnosis of syphilis,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus