Comparison and Noise Suppression of the Transmitted and Reflected Photoplethysmography Signals

<table class="fixed-width table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><colgroup><col style="width:6.29em"/><col style="width:10.75em"/><col style="width:10.75em"/></colgroup><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left" rowspan="2">Noisy signals</td><td class="align_center" colspan="2">Denoised signals</td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_center">by using the wavelet-based method</td><td class="align_center">by using the proposed method</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">7.6857</td><td class="align_center">16.2620</td><td class="align_center">12.7598</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">5.7739</td><td class="align_center">6.1874</td><td class="align_center">11.3860</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>The comparison results of SNRs.</div>

BioMed Research International

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: Comparison and Noise Suppression of the Transmitted and Reflected Photoplethysmography Signals 