BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Current Trends in Studies of Ancient Diseases

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 7406797 | 7 pages |

Lumbosacral Defects in a 16th–18th-Century Joseon Dynasty Skeletal Series from Korea

Academic Editor: William B. Rodgers
Received08 May 2018
Accepted05 Jun 2018
Published27 Jun 2018


Paleopathological evidence for congenital and degenerative disorders of the lumbosacral vertebrae is informative about ancient individual lifeways and physical conditions. However, very few studies have focused on the paleopathology of the lumbosacral vertebrae in ancient skeletal series from East Asia. One reason for the lack of studies is that skeletal samples from East Asia are typically insufficient in size to represent populations for comparative studies within the continent. Here, we present the first comprehensive analysis of lumbosacral defects in an East Asian human skeletal sample, examining occurrences of spina bifida occulta (SBO), lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV), and spondylolysis in remains from Joseon tombs dating to the 16–18th centuries in Korea. In this study, we present an alternative methodology for understanding activities of daily life among ancient Koreans through paleopathological analysis.

1. Introduction

Ancient human skeletal remains, when found in well-preserved condition, allow inferences about the etiology of pathology and make it possible to estimate health conditions in past communities [1]. Paleopathological evidence for congenital and degenerative disorders of the lumbosacral vertebrae is informative about ancient individual lifeways and physical conditions [2]. Pathological findings of the lumbosacral vertebrae, such as spina bifida occulta (SBO), lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV), and spondylolysis, have been observed in archaic hominins.

SBO is a congenital defect of the vertebral laminae associated with neural tube defects (NTD), or the failure of neural tube closure during embryonic development [3]. In SBO, the lamina have partial defects and the spinal cord is not involved. Both genetic and environmental factors such as folic acid deficiency during pregnancy affect the pathogenesis of NTD [3]. SBO may be located at any level of the neural tube [4].

LSTV is a common developmental malformation in the area of lumbosacral transition [5, 6]. The prevalence of LSTV is reported to vary from 3.3% to 35.6% [79]. The most common type of LSTV is the sacralization of L5, which is caused by changes in the shape and size of the L5 processus costalis articulating with the upper edge of S1. The next most common transitional malformations are changes in the number of sacral vertebrae, which may be caused by the lumbarization of S1, by sacralization of Co1, or by the presence of a sixth sacral vertebra [5, 6]. Clinically, LSTV is associated with lower back pain (Bertolotti syndrome) [6, 10]. Degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs may cause lower back pain due to increased flexibility above the transitional vertebrae [6]. Additionally, LSTV significantly impacts the anatomy of surrounding structures in ways that are critical for spinal surgeons to recognize [11, 12].

Spondylolysis is a bony defect in the pars interarticularis of the human vertebrae [13]. This defect is associated with the unique lordotic posture of humans, an adaptation to upright walking [14, 15]. Spondylolytic defects are typically caused by congenital weaknesses or stress fractures [16]. Therefore, the majority of spondylolysis cases involve the lumbar spine, usually L5, and appear bilaterally. Males are affected more often than females because they often engage in more strenuous activities [14, 16, 17].

Lumbosacral defects have been reported in prehistoric and historic skeletal series throughout the world, except Asia [13, 1822]. Existing reports of lumbosacral defects in Asia are limited to discussions of clinical epidemiology that focus on patient symptoms and complicated analyses of medical images [15, 2327].

In this study, we present a comprehensive analysis of lumbosacral defects documented in human skeletal remains from Joseon tombs of the 16–18th centuries in Korea. Our data will facilitate a better understanding of the paleopathological prevalence of lumbosacral defects in past Asian peoples. We performed archaeological and anthropological analyses of the Joseon dynasty skeletal series and compare our results to those of previous reports in other countries during similar eras.

2. Materials and Methods

We examined a large series of human skeletons (n = 198) making up the Joseon Dynasty Human Sample Collection (JDHSC), which is maintained at Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea. Most of the skeletons were collected from graves attributed to the Joseon dynasty. Korean archaeologists estimate that these Joseon graves date to the 16th–18th centuries. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Seoul National University Hospital confirmed that this study was exempt from board review (IRB no. 2017-001). We followed the guidelines of the Vermillion Accord on Human Remains, World Archaeological Congress [28].

Sex determinations were made on the basis of pelvic morphology, including examinations of the greater sciatic notch, preauricular sulcus, ischiopubic ramus, subpubic angle, subpubic concavity, and ventral arc [29, 30]. Ancillary indicators used for sex determination included characters of the skull, specifically the nuchal crest, the mastoid process, the supraorbital margin, glabella, and the mental eminence [31, 32].

Incomplete midline closure of the lumbosacral vertebrae indicated SBO, regardless of mesenchymal, osseous, or neural tissue origin during embryological development. Following previous definitions drawn from the literature, SBO at S3, S4, and S5 was considered within the limits of normal variation for the sacral hiatus [33]. LSTV was identified only if all of the lumbosacral vertebrae were present. After recording the number of lumbar vertebrae and sacral segments, the conversion of L5 or L6 into S1 was defined as sacralization and the reverse as lumbarization. The presence of an extra L6 with 5 sacral segments was defined as a form of LSTV in this study, including the lumbarization of S1 in cases of six sacral vertebrae and the sacralization of Co1 [5, 6]. Defects of the pars interarticularis of the vertebrae were examined in cases of spondylolysis [15]. To prevent bias, we excluded cases of fresh spondylolysis that were difficult to differentiate from postmortem fractures of the pedicle.

We processed the data using descriptive statistics. Differences according to sex and age were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test with a significance level of 5%, using R version 3.4.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

The skeletal sample included 81 males, 68 females, and 49 indeterminates. Lumbosacral data are presented in Tables 14. The most frequent lumbosacral defect was SBO, followed by sacralization, and lumbarization or spondylolysis (Table 1). In cases of SBO, S1 was the most frequent defect site (8 of 198, 4.0%), followed by S2 (4 of 198, 2.0%) and L5 (2 of 198, 1.0%). Four male cases (1 case at S3, 3 cases at S4) and 3 female cases (2 cases at S3, 1 case at S4) were not regarded as SBO, but as congruent with normal variation of sacral hiatus. SBO was more frequently observed in males, especially at S1, than in females (Table 2). However, the difference between sexes was not significant by Fisher’s exact test (p = 0.143). In one male case (no. 190), the SBO defect involved all segments of the sacrum as seen in Figure 1.

Number of findings (%)

Spina bifida occulta15 (7.6)
Sacralization10 (5.1)
Lumbarization6 (3.0)
Spondylolysis6 (3.0)

Number of SBO occurrences/total (%)P value

Spina bifida at L51/81 (1.2%)1/68 (1.5%)0/49 (0.0%)1.000
Spina bifida at S16/81 (7.4%)1/68 (1.5%)1/49 (2.0%)0.126
Spina bifida at S22/81 (2.5%)1/68 (1.5%)1/49 (2.0%)1.000
Spina bifida at S1–S51/81 (1.2%)0/68 (0.0%)0/49 (0.0%)1.000
Total10/81 (12.3%)3/68 (4.4%)2/49 (4.1%)0.143

probability value of Fisher’s exact test between the sexes.

Number of LSTV occurrences/Total (%)P value

Sacralization at L57/81 (8.6%)1/68 (1.5%)0/49 (0.0%)0.071
Sacralization at L62/81 (2.5%)0/68 (0.0%)0/49 (0.0%)0.501
Lumbarization at S11/81 (1.2%)1/68 (1.5%)2/49 (4.1%)1.000
Extra L6 with 5 sacral segments1/81 (1.2%)1/68 (1.5%)0/49 (0.0%)1.000
Total11/81 (13.6%)3/68 (4.4%)2/49 (4.1%)0.088

probability value of Fisher’s exact test between the sexes.

Number of spondylolysis occurrences / total (%)P value

Spondylolysis at L21/81 (1.2%)0/68 (0.0%)0/49 (0.0%)1.000
Spondylolysis at L41/81 (1.2%)0/68 (0.0%)0/49 (0.0%)1.000
Spondylolysis at L51/81 (1.2%)2/68 (2.9%)1/49 (2.0%)0.592
Total3/81 (3.7%)2/68 (2.9%)1/49 (2.0%)1.000

Probability value of Fisher’s exact test between the sexes.

The prevalences of total LSTV were approximately 14% in males and 4% in females (Table 3). Males were more likely to exhibit sacralization of L5 and L6 than females (p = 0.022, data not shown) although the difference in cases of total LSTV (sacralization plus lumbarization) between sexes was not significant (p = 0.088). In the same skeletal series, we also note that two cases, one female (no. 113) and one male (no. 162), exhibited extra L6 alongside 5 sacral segments (Table 3, Figure 2). These cases were considered to represent the lumbarization of S1 among the six sacral vertebrae that were present.

The prevalence of spondylolysis according to sex is shown in Table 4. Overall, the most frequent defect site was L5 (4 of total 198, 2.0%) but no defects were found in the sacrum. There were no significant differences between sexes (Table 4). Among the sex-indeterminate skeletons, we identified a unique case (no. 289) with an extra L6 and spondylolysis at L5 (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

NTD, including SBO, are some of the most common types of congenital malformations, occurring at 21 to 28 days after conception [34]. The general prevalence of NTD is estimated to be 0.51–4.2 per 1000 live births, stillbirths, and pregnancy terminations in the modern period [35, 36]. The birth prevalence of spina bifida may differ considerably depending on geographical and population origin [37].

SBO is the most common developmental defect of the vertebral column observed in historical skeletal series, occurring frequently at the lumbosacral border, with reported incidences of 5.2% to 26.0% [13]. In our study of Joseon skeletons, we also found that SBO was the most commonly observed pathology in the lumbosacral vertebrae. There are significant temporal and geographic influences on maternal nutrition, including folic acid supplementation, affecting the etiology of spina bifida [34]. When we compared data for the Joseon skeletal series to the results of previous studies examining different countries and different historical periods, SBO tended to have higher prevalence in the Joseon sample than in most historical populations, excepting medieval Slovakia (Table 5). The prevalence of SBO in Slovakian skeletal series [13] may have been higher than the prevalence of SBO in Korea during the Joseon dynasty, because the majority of lower sacral segment defects (S4-S5, S3–S5) were regarded as SBO, which was in turn defined as being with the range of normal variation for the sacral hiatus. Taken together, these observations indicate that the prevalence of SBO among the Joseon people is one of the highest ever observed among ancient skeletal series. Neurological defects, particularly spina bifida, have actually revealed a significant decrease over time due to the supplementation of food with fortified folic acid worldwide [38]. Therefore, the high prevalence of SBO in our Joseon dynasty sample might have been caused by maternal folate insufficiencies that were more serious than in other populations.

CountryCenturyPrevalence (%)
Spina bifida occultaSacralizationLumbarizationSpondylolysis

Joseon Korea (This study)16-18th12.
British [18]10-19th--------
Bulgaria [19]9-15th6.603.8--2.9------
France [21]5-11th-----3.3--3.3--10
Hungary [22]10-17th7.
Romania [20]15-19th5.21.93.8---------
Slovakia [13]11-12th26.

The lumbosacral region is the most frequent site of border shifting [13]. Abnormal cranial shifting leads to the sacralization of the fifth lumbar vertebra, while caudal shifting leads to lumbarization of the first sacral vertebra. In both cases, the defect may be complete or incomplete, unilateral or bilateral, and symmetrical or asymmetrical. According to previous studies, the general prevalence of LSTV ranges from 4% to 35.6% in different populations, and males are more frequently affected than females [79]. Compared with samples from different countries but of similar era, differences of prevalence of LSTV between Joseon-Korea and other medieval countries prove to be minor, with a slight tendency for the prevalence of LSTV to be higher in males than in females, a pattern that holds true throughout a variety of countries (Table 5).

In the literature, spondylolysis is described as ossification union failure or the fracture of the pars interarticularis of the vertebra, resulting in separation of the vertebra into two parts. This separation occurs most commonly in S1 and L3–L5 [13]. The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis is estimated to be 5% in the general population but can be as high as 63% in people who participate in certain sporting activities and also varies between populations [14, 16, 39]. For example, 13% of a sample of Canadian Inuits exhibited spondylolysis, while the prevalence was 18.5% in a sample of Archaic Indians [13]. Approximately 20.7% of Japanese athletes are affected by spondylolysis [40]. Lumbar spondylolysis is thought to result from stress fractures of the pars interarticularis that occur frequently in athletes. The Joseon sample examined in this study was assumed to represent individuals only infrequently engaged in mechanically demanding activities, with a total incidence of spondylolysis (3.0%) lower than that of any other known ancient skeletal series (Table 5). The prevalence is also low compared to modern Koreans, in which population values range from 5.9% to 9.1% [14, 41]. The low frequency of spondylolysis observed in the Joseon sample suggests a lack of heavy physical labor in this population [29]. As the individuals in the sample primarily represent the upper and ruling classes of the Joseon kingdom [42], the relatively low prevalence of spondylolysis we observed could reflect socioeconomic differences. However, comparisons of disease in different skeletal series must be approached carefully if research methods used have not been standardized [34].

5. Conclusion

Very few studies have focused on the paleopathology of lumbosacral vertebrae in ancient skeletal series from East Asia. One reason for the lack of studies is that skeletal samples from East Asia are typically insufficient in size to represent populations for comparative studies within the continent. This paleopathological study of lumbosacral pathologies in a large sample from the Joseon era is thus significant. Our results suggest that chronic scarcities of folic acid were prevalent during the Joseon dynasty, as evidenced by the high incidence of SBO, similar to other medieval samples. In contrast, the relatively low prevalence of spondylolysis may reflect a lack of strenuous physical labor among the ruling classes of Joseon society. Differences in the prevalence of LSTV between Joseon people in Korea and medieval samples from other countries are minor, indicating that genetic causes are unlikely. This study contributes to our understanding of daily life among ancient Koreans through paleopathology.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2017R1D1A1B03030127) and by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2013R1A1A2009306).


  1. F. J. Rühli, F. M. Galassi, and M. Haeusler, “Palaeopathology: Current challenges and medical impact,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 816–822, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Weber and A. Czarnetzki, “Paleopathology of the lumbar spine in the early medieval period,” Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 637–643, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. R. Detrait, T. M. George, H. C. Etchevers, J. R. Gilbert, M. Vekemans, and M. C. Speer, “Human neural tube defects: Developmental biology, epidemiology, and genetics,” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 515–524, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Riddick-Grisham and L. Deming, Pediatric Life Care Planning and Case Management, Taylor & Francis, 2nd edition, 2011.
  5. V. Dzupa, M. Slepanek, M. Striz et al., “Developmental malformations in the area of the lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and sacrum: Differences in gender and left/right distribution,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 689–693, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Lian, N. Levine, and W. Cho, “A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration,” European Spine Journal, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 995–1004, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C.-Y. J. Hsieh, J. D. Vanderford, S. R. Moreau, and T. Prong, “Lumbosacral transitional segments: Classification, prevalence, and effect on disk height,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 483–489, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Apazidis, P. A. Ricart, C. M. Diefenbach, and J. M. Spivak, “The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine,” The Spine Journal, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 858–862, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Tang, X.-F. Yang, S.-W. Yang et al., “Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in a population-based study of 5860 individuals: Prevalence and relationship to low back pain,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 1679–1682, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. C. Cho, G. D. Bae, Y. C. Lee, and K. S. Kim, “Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae in korean,” Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, vol. 26, no. 6, p. 1244, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Aihara, K. Takahashi, A. Ogasawara, E. Itadera, Y. Ono, and H. Moriya, “Intervertebral disc degeneration associated with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: a clinical and anatomical study,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 687–691, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. Luoma, T. Vehmas, R. Raininko, R. Luukkonen, and H. Riihimäki, “Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra: Relation to Disc Degeneration and Low Back Pain,” The Spine Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 200–205, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Masnicová and R. Beňuš, “Developmental anomalies in skeletal remains from the Great Moravia and Middle Ages cemeteries at Devín (Slovakia),” International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 266–274, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Ko and S. Lee, “Prevalence of Spondylolysis and Its Relationship with Low Back Pain in Selected Population,” Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 34, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. V. Ward and B. Latimer, “Human evolution and the development of spondylolysis,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 1808–1814, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Tezuka, K. Sairyo, T. Sakai, and A. Dezawa, “Etiology of Adult-onset Stress Fracture in the Lumbar Spine,” Clinical Spine Surgery, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. E233–E238, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. T. Wald, J. R. Geske, F. E. Diehn et al., “A practice audit of CT-guided injections of pars interarticularis defects in patients with axial low back pain: A primer for further investigation,” Pain Medicine, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 745–750, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Mays, “Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 352–362, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Toneva and S. Nikolova, “Some paleopathological cases from a medieval necropolis of drustar (Silistra), Bulgaria (Investigation of the postcranial skeletons),” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 603–608, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  20. V. M. Groza, A. Simalcsik, and L. Bejenaru, “Spina bifida occulta in medieval and post-medieval skeletons from IASI city, in North-East Romania,” Biologie animala, pp. 101–113, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Zemirline, J.-P. Vincent, S. Sid-Ahmed, D. Le Nen, and F. Dubrana, “Lumbo-sacral malformations and spina bifida occulta in medieval skeletons from Brittany,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 149–153, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. Jozsa, I. Pap, and E. Fothi, “The occurence of spina bifida occulta in medieval and contemporaneous Hungarian populations,” Anthropologia Hungarica, vol. 22, pp. 57–60, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. W. Wu, Y. R. Xing, Y. B. Wen et al., “Prevalence of spina bifida occulta and its relationship with overactive bladder in middle-aged and elderly Chinese people,” International Neurourology Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 151–158, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Fidas, H. L. MacDonald, R. A. Elton, S. R. Wild, G. D. Chisholm, and R. Scott, “Prevalence and patterns of spina bifida occulta in 2707 normal adults,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 537–542, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. Sakai, Y. Goda, F. Tezuka et al., “Clinical features of patients with pars defects identified in adulthood,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 259–262, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. T. Morita, T. Ikata, S. Katoh, and R. Miyake, “Lumbar spondylolysis in children and adolescents,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (British Volume), vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 620–625, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  27. L. Kalichman, D. H. Kim, L. Li, A. Guermazi, V. Berkin, and D. J. Hunter, “Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: Prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population,” The Spine Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 199–205, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. World Archaeological Congress, “The vermillion accord on human remains,” in Proceedings of the WAC Inter-Congress, South Dakota, USA, 1989, View at: Google Scholar
  29. T. W. Phenice, “A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 297–301, 1969. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. M. Krogman and M. Y Iscan, The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, USA, 2nd edition, 1986. View at: Publisher Site
  31. Buikstra J. E and D. H. Ubelaker, Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains, vol. 44 of Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville, Ark, USA, 1995. View at: Publisher Site
  32. D. H. Ubelaker, Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation, vol. 2 of Manuals on Archeology, Taraxacum, Washington, DC, USA, 3rd edition, 1999.
  33. A. Kumar and R. S. Tubbs, “Spina bifida: A diagnostic dilemma in paleopathology,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 19–33, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. V. Kancherla and R. E. Black, “Historical perspective on folic acid and challenges in estimating global prevalence of neural tube defects,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1414, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Dolk, M. Loane, and E. Garne, “The prevalence of congenital anomalies in Europe,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 686, pp. 349–364, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. Oi, “Current status of prenatal management of fetal spina bifida in the world: Worldwide cooperative survey on the medico-ethical issue,” Child's Nervous System, vol. 19, no. 7-8, pp. 596–599, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. J. Copp, N. S. Adzick, L. S. Chitty, J. M. Fletcher, G. N. Holmbeck, and G. M. Shaw, “Spina bifida,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 1, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  38. D. K. Lamichhane, J.-H. Leem, M. Park et al., “Increased prevalence of some birth defects in Korea, 2009-2010,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 16, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. S. Hu, C. B. Tribus, M. Diab, and A. J. Ghanayem, “Spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 656–671, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  40. H. Hoshina, “Spondylolysis in Athletes,” The Physician and Sportsmedicine, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 75–79, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. S. Son, Y. W. Kim, C. H. Yi, C. H. Chae, J. H. Kim, and B. M. Cho, “Prevalence of Spondylolysis in Pre-employment Screening Examination,” Korean Journal of Spine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 260–265, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  42. D. K. Kim, M. J. Kim, Y. Kim et al., “Long bone fractures identified in the Joseon Dynasty human skeletons of Korea,” Anatomy & Cell Biology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 203–209, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Yi-Suk Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

753 Views | 308 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.