Expression and Functional Characterization of a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide: Human Beta-Defensin 118

Lin, Qian; Xie, Kunhong; Chen, Daiwen; Yu, Bing; Mao, Xiangbing; Yu, Jie; Luo, Junqiu; Zheng, Ping; Luo, Yuheng; Yan, Hui; He, Jun

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1395304

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 1395304 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1395304

Expression and Functional Characterization of a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide: Human Beta-Defensin 118

Qian Lin,^1,2Kunhong Xie,^1,2Daiwen Chen,^1,2Bing Yu,^1,2Xiangbing Mao,^1,2Jie Yu,^1,2Junqiu Luo,^1,2Ping Zheng,^1,2Yuheng Luo,^1,2Hui Yan,^1,2and Jun He^1,2

Academic Editor: Fu-Ming Tsai

Received18 Aug 2020

Revised27 Oct 2020

Accepted28 Oct 2020

Published10 Nov 2020

Abstract

Purpose. β-Defensin 118 (DEFB118) is a novel host defense peptide (HDP) identified in humans. To evaluate its potentials for future utilization, the DEFB118 gene was expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) and the recombinant protein was fully characterized. Methods. The DEFB118 protein was obtained by heterologous expression using E. coli Rosetta (DE3). Antibacterial activity of DEFB118 was determined by using various bacterial strains. IPEC-J cells challenged by E. coli K88 were used to determine its influences on inflammatory responses. Results. The E. coli transformants yielded more than 250 μg/mL DEFB118 protein after 4 h induction by 1.0 mM IPTG. The DEFB118 was estimated by SDS-PAGE to be 30 kDa, and MALDI-TOF analysis verified that it is a human β-defensin 118. Importantly, the DEFB118 showed antimicrobial activities against both Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli K88 and E. coli DH5α) and Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus and B. subtilis), with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 μg/mL. Hemolytic assays showed that DEFB118 had no detrimental impact on cell viability. Additionally, DEFB118 was found to elevate the viability of IPEC-J2 cells upon E. coli K88 challenge. Moreover, DEFB118 significantly decreased cell apoptosis in the late apoptosis phase and downregulated the expression of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α in IPEC-J2 cell exposure to E. coli K88. Conclusions. These results suggested a novel function of the mammalian defensins, and the antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties of DEFB118 may allow it as a potential substitute for conventionally used antibiotics or drugs.

1. Introduction

In the last decades, antibiotics have been widely used as a therapeutic medicine to control various infectious diseases [1–3]. However, their continuous use not only leads to serious environmental pollution but also increases the risk of developing drug resistance [4–8]. Therefore, developing novel substitutes for conventionally used antibiotics has attracted considerable research interest worldwide [9–12]. Host defense peptides (HDPs), a major subclass of the antimicrobial peptide (AMP) family, are expressed in a variety of epithelial tissues and cells [13, 14]. Previous studies indicated that HDPs can disrupt the bacterial membranes by forming nonspecific electrostatic interactions with membrane lipids and therefore can protect the host from a broad range of pathogens including bacteria, virus, and fungus [15–17]. Considering the fact that bacteria are less able to develop resistance to HDPs than to traditional antibiotics [17], the administration of HDPs is a potentially novel therapeutic strategy for infectious diseases and may present a promising alternative to the traditional antibiotics.

Defensins comprise an important family of HDPs for mammalian animals. According to distribution patterns of the intramolecular disulfide bonds, defensins are classified into α- and β-forms [18, 19]. The α-defensins are expressed in neutrophils and paneth cells, whereas the β-defensins are usually expressed in the epithelia. Recent studies indicated that the β-defensins have multidirectional biological properties, including antiviral, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory effects [20, 21]. For instance, β-defensin 114 was found to show antimicrobial activities against E. coli DH5α and E. coli K88 [22], while β-defensin 129 was reported to attenuate intestinal inflammation and epithelial atrophy in rat exposure to bacterial endotoxin [14]. The human β-defensin 118 (DEFB118) is a novel identified HDP, which is present in the epithelial cells of different ducts and most abundant in the caput epithelium, where it is present in the lumen and located on sperm [23]. A previous study indicated that the DEFB118 caused rapid permeabilization of both outer and inner membranes of E. coli and striking morphological alterations in the bacterial surfaces [24]. Therefore, the DEFB118 may contribute to epididymal innate immunity and protect the sperm against attack by microorganisms in the male and female reproductive tracts.

Although numerous studies indicated a critical role of β-defensins in the host defense against exogenous pathogens, the functions of DEFB118 protein have not been fully characterized. Moreover, the production of DEFB118 is still not commercially feasible because of its high cost. In the present study, we describe the cloning and expression of the DEFB118 gene by a pET expression vector in E. coli. In addition, the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities of the DEFB118 protein were fully characterized.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Vectors

The E. coli DH5α and E. coli Rosetta (DE3) strains were purchased from TIANGEN (China). E. coli K88 was kindly provided by Professor Lianqiang Che, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University. Salmonella typhimurium ATCC14028 (S. typhimurium), Staphylococcus aureus CICC23656 (S. aureus), and Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) were kindly provided by Professor Qigui Yan, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University. The pET32a (+) was purchased from Invitrogen.

2.2. Plasmid Construction

DEFB118 gene was obtained by complete gene synthesis (Beijing Cycle-Tech Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China). The company provides a cloned strain of DH5α-PMD19-DEFB118 containing the target gene DEFB118. And sequencing was identified in Shenggong Biological Engineering Co., Ltd. Sequencing results were compared by software DNAMAN. The plasmid PMD19-DEFB118 was extracted by using Plasmid Mini Kit I (Omega, America) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The plasmid pMD19-DEFB118 and expression vector pET32a (+) were double-digested with EcoRI and NotI enzymes (Takara, Japan) at 37°C for 4 h. After purification by agarose gel electrophoresis, the isolated DNA fragments were ligated by T4 DNA ligase (Takara, Japan). And then, the ligated product was transformed into E. coli DH5α cells using the heat shock method and plated on LB agar containing kanamycin (50 μg/mL). The positive colonies were randomly picked, then confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

2.3. Expression of DEFB118 in E. coli

For expression, plasmid pET32a (+)-DEFB118 gene was transformed into E. coli Rosetta (DE3) cells using a heat shock method. And then, positive bacterial colonies were confirmed as the methods of construction of the expression vector. The selected positive bacteria were incubated, once OD 600 reached 1.0; then, 1.0 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was added to induce protein expression. After incubation for 4 h at 28°C, bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at for 10 min at 4°C and lysis by lysis buffer (500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF, Lysozyme 0.2 mg/mL, 10 U/mL DNase (pH 7.5)) for 30 min at 4°C. Then, schizolytic cells were sonicated (4 s pulse and 8 s interval; 30 cycles; Sonics Vibra-Cell, USA) and centrifuged at for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and stored at -80°C until analysis.

2.4. Affinity Purification

The supernatant obtained above was filtered by 0.22 μm filter and then applied to Ni 2+-IDA column (Sangon Biotech, China) and purified according to specification. Briefly, 10 resin volumes of Binding Buffer (50 mM NaH₂PO₄, 300 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) were added to wash away the impure protein, and then, 5 resin volumes of Elution Buffer (50 mM NaH₂PO₄, 300 mM NaCl, 150 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) were added to elute the DEFB118 from the column. Then, protein concentration was quantified with the BCA assay (Beyotime, China). The purified DEFB118 was ran on 12% SDS-PAGE. The rest was stored at −80°C to analyze antimicrobial activities.

2.5. Antimicrobial Activity Assays

The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of purified DEFB118 was measured by the microtiter broth dilution method [25]. E. coli DH5α, pathogenic E. coli K88+, S. typhimurium, S. aureus, and B. subtilis were grown to 0.4 OD 600 nm at 37°C in LB; Streptococcus was grown to 0.4 OD 600 nm at 37°C in THY (Todd-Hewitt+yeast extract). The target cell culture was diluted to CFUs/mL with the same media, respectively. A total of 100 μL of DEFB118 and 100 μL of cell suspension were added into each well. The activity of DEFB118 was tested over a concentration range of 512, 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, and 1 mg/L, and all assays were tested in triplicate. Bacterial plates were incubated at 37°C for 16 h, and the absorption of cell culture was recorded at 600 nm. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of peptide at which there was no change in optical density.

2.6. Hemolytic Activity Assay

Hemolytic activity of DEFB118 was determined as described earlier [26]. In brief, erythrocytes from heparinized pig blood were washed thrice with cold PBS (pH 7.2) and resuspended to a concentration of 4% in saline. Erythrocytes were treated with different concentrations of DEFB118 (200 μL) in a 96-well plate and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The plate was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and supernatants were transferred to a fresh plate. Absorbance at 414 nm of saline and 0.1% Triton X-100-treated erythrocytes served as 0 and 100% hemolysis controls, respectively.

2.7. Cell Culture

Intestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) were cultured in a 75 cm² cell culture flask in DMEM-F12 with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. cells/well were seeded in 12-well plates and grown to ~60% confluence at 37°C in a CO₂ incubator (5% ), then incubated with antimicrobial peptides DEFB118 for 12 h (DEFB118, DEFB118+E. coli K88). Cells were challenged with CFU/well E. coli K88 for h (DEFB118+E. coli K88, E. coli K88); control cells were cultured in a culture medium of 2% serum (without any antibiotics) without any treatment. Total cellular RNA was collected using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Dalian, China).

2.8. Cytotoxicity Assay

The cytotoxicity of DEFB118 was measured according to a previous study [27]. Briefly, IPEC-J2 cells were cultured in DMEM-F12 with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin for 48 h and then resuspended to 10⁵ cells/mL in FBS-free DMEM-F12 media. A volume of 100 μL of cells was aliquoted into sterile flat-bottomed 96-well plates (Corning, USA). The DEFB118 was added to the cells and incubated at 37°C/5% CO₂ for 24 h (DEFB118, DEFB118+E. coli K88). Then, cells were challenged with CFU/well E. coli K88 for 1 h (DEFB118+E. coli K88, E. coli K88); control cells were cultured in complete medium without any treatment. Cell viability was evaluated with the CCK8 assay (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.9. Adhesion Experiment

cells/well were seeded in 6-well plates and grown to ~60% confluence at 37°C in a CO₂ incubator (5% ), then incubated with antimicrobial peptides DEFB118 for 12 h (DEFB118+E. coli K88). Cells were challenged with CFU/well E. coli K88 for 1 h (DEFB118+E. coli K88, E. coli K88). The supernatant was aspirated, and the floating cells and E. coli K88 were washed with 0.01 M PBS. The cells were lysed with sterile distilled water, diluted in a series of lysates, and coated in MacConkey agar medium. The number of colonies grown indicated the number of adherents of E. coli K88 to epithelial cells.

2.10. Assessment of Apoptosis by Flow Cytometry

In order to evaluate the protective effect of DEFB118 against E. coli K88, IPEC-J2 cells were grown to ~60% confluence at 37°C in a CO₂ incubator (5% ), then incubated with DEFB118 for 12 h (DEFB118, DEFB118+E. coli K88). Cells were challenged with CFU/well E. coli K88 for 2.5 h (DEFB118+E. coli K88, E. coli K88); control cells were cultured in a culture medium of 2% serum (without any antibiotics) without any treatment. Treated cells were harvested and labeled with an anti-Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences, USA). Floating cells were collected; then, attached cells were washed with 0.01 M PBS and trypsinized for 2 min. Finally, trypsinized cells and floating cells were added together to centrifugate at 350 g for 10 min, then stained with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI). The intensity of the markers was examined by flow cytometry (FACSCanto II, BD Biosciences, USA). All flow cytometric data were analyzed using FlowJo software (BD Biosciences, USA).

2.11. RNA Extraction and RT-PCR

IPEC-J2 cells were harvested, and the total RNA was extracted using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity and quality of the isolated RNA were determined by absorbance at 260 and 280 nm [28]. And then, cDNA was synthesized using a Reverse Transcriptase kit (Takara, Dalian, China). Briefly, quantitative PCR was performed by the QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with a total of 10 μL of assay solution containing 5 μL SYBR Green mix (Takara), 0.2 μL Rox, 3 μL deionized H₂O, 1 μL cDNA template, and 0.4 μL each of forward and reverse primers (Qingke, China). The relative gene expressions compared with the housekeeping gene β-actin were calculated by 2^-CT [29].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21.0 software. Data were expressed as the . Statistical analysis of the treatment of IPEC-J2 and cytotoxicity was carried out using two-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple comparisons test. Image was produced using GraphPad Prism software (Version 7, GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Comparison of the DEFB118 Nucleotide Sequences

Blast analysis of the synthesized DEFB118 sequence was performed by using the DNAMAN 8.0. Results showed that the synthesized DEFB118 sequence was consistent with the published sequence (Fig. S1). Both contain a 372 bp open reading frame, which encodes a 123-amino acid DEFB118 mature protein. Structural analysis by using the “SWISS model” showed that the DEFB118 protein exhibited a classic beta-ring conformation (Figure 1(a)). Amino acid sequence analysis showed that the amino acid sequence of DEFB118 is highly conserved (Figure 1(b)). The human DEFB118 sequence is more than 97% identical to the sequences obtained from Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Nomascus leucogenys. Phylogenetic tree analysis showed that the human DEFB118 is close to that of Gorilla gorilla (Figure 1(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.2. Expression and Purification of the Recombinant DEFB118

The DEFB118 gene with two designated restriction enzyme sites (EcoRI/NotI) was artificially synthesized. The two restriction enzyme sites allow directional cloning of the DEFB118 gene into the pET32a expression vector. A 312 bp fragment was observed after double digestion of recombinant plasmid with the two restriction enzymes (Fig. S2a). The recombinant plasmids were transformed into the E. coli Rosetta (DE3), and the positive clones were selected by PCR (Fig. S2B). The most desired strain was chosen for small-scale induction by using 1 mmol/L IPTG at 28°C. We found that the induction time significantly affected the expression level. As shown in Figure 2(a), E. coli achieved a maxima yield of the DEFB118 protein after 4 h induction (more than 250 μg/mL). The molecular weight of recombinant DEFB118 was estimated by SDS-PAGE to be 30 kDa (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). The crude protein collected from ultrasonically disrupted bacteria was purified by using Ni²⁺-IDA affinity chromatography (Figure 2(b)). The target band was collected, and amino acid sequence of DEFB118 was identified by using mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF). As shown in Figure 3, the protein sequence of the recombinant DEFB118 protein 100% matches the sequence of human DEFB118 (NP_473453.1).

(a)

(b)

Figure 2

SDS-PAGE analysis of DEFB118 produced by E. coli Rosetta. (a) SDS-PAGE of DEFB118 from E. coli Rosetta. M protein markers (DL 150 kDa); Lane 1: E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a (+) induced by 1 mmol/L IPTG for 10 h at 28°C; Lane 2: E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a (+) induced by 1 mmol/L IPTG for 8 h at 28°C; Lane 3: E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a (+) induced by 1 mmol/L IPTG for 6 h at 28°C; Lane 4: E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a (+) induced by 1 mmol/L IPTG for 4 h at 28°C; Lane 5: E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a (+) induced by 1 mmol/L IPTG for 2 h at 28°C; Lane 6: E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a (+) (noninduced). (b) Purification of DEFB118. M protein markers (DL 150 kDa); Lanes 1-2 DEFB118 (1.2 mg/mL) purified by Ni 2+-IDA affinity chromatography; Lanes 3-5 DEFB118 (0.6 mg/mL) purified by Ni 2+-IDA affinity chromatography.

(a)

(b)

3.3. Antibacterial Activity of the DEFB118

The antibacterial activities of DEFB118 were investigated by using Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria strains. As shown in Table 1, DEFB118 showed strong antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria such as the E. coli K88 and E. coli DH5α with a MIC of 4 mg/L. DEFB118 also showed antibacterial activity against the S. typhimurium (with a MIC of 8 mg/L). Moreover, the DEFB118 showed strong antibacterial activities against Gram-positive bacteria such as the S. aureus and B. subtilis with a MIC of 4 μg/mL.

3.4. Hemolytic Activity of the DEFB118

Erythrocytes were collected from fresh porcine blood and incubated with different concentrations (0–256 mg/L) of DEFB118 for 1 h. As compared to the Triton X-100, the DEFB118 showed no significant hemolytic activity at all concentrations (Figure 4).

3.5. Influences of DEFB118 on Cell Viability, Apoptosis, and Inflammatory Response in IPEC-J2 Cells

As shown in Figure 5, E. coli K88 challenge decreased the viability of the IPEC-J2 cells. However, DEFB118 treatment significantly elevated the cell viability (). Moreover, DEFB118 can inhibit the adhesion of E. coli K88 on the IPEC-J2 cells () (Fig. S3). As compared to the control group, E. coli K88 challenge significantly elevated the apoptosis rate in the IPEC-J2 cells (Figure 6). However, DEFB118 treatment significantly decreased the late apoptosis rate in the E. coli K88-challenged cells (). Interestingly, E. coli K88 challenge significantly elevated the expression levels of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in the IPEC-J2 cells (Figure 7(a)). However, DEFB118 treatment downregulated their expression levels in the E. coli K88-challenged cells (). Moreover, DEFB118 treatment significantly downregulated the expression level of caspase 3 in the E. coli K88-challenged cells ().

Figure 6

Influence of DEFB118 on E. coli K88-induced apoptosis in IPEC-J2 cells. Cell distribution analysis of apoptosis of IPEC-J2 cells treated with DEFB118, E. coli K88, and DEFB118 plus E. coli K88. In each diagram, Q1 represents the percentage of nonviable, necrotic cells, Q2 represents the percentage of late apoptotic IPEC-J2 cells, Q3 represents the percentages of early apoptotic IPEC-J2 cells, and Q4 represents the percentage of live IPEC-J2 cells. The statistical analysis of cell distribution data among samples; total apoptotic cells included Q2 with Q3. (a–c) Values within a column differ if they do not share a common superscript ().

(a)

(b)

Figure 7

Influence of DEFB118 on E. coli K88-induced inflammatory responses in IPEC-J2 cells. Total RNA was extracted from IPEC-J2 cells, and the expression of related genes was measured by real-time fluorescence PCR. The target gene mRNA expression level was calculated using the 2^–ΔΔCt method: (a) proinflammatory cytokine; (b) apoptotic factor. (A, B) Values within a column differ if they do not share a common superscript (). IL-1β: interleukin 1 beta; IL-6: interleukin 6; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor alpha.

4. Discussion

In the last decades, the use and misuse of antibiotics have led to the development of antibiotic resistance (AMR), which is one of the biggest threats to global public health [30]. The World Health Organization (WHO) predicts that there will be 10 million deaths due to AMR in 2050 [31]. Therefore, substitutes for conventionally used antibiotics have attracted considerable research interest worldwide. Defensins are a family of host defense peptides present in vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants. Currently, the β-defensins have attracted considerable research interest since it has been reported to show a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and participate in the regulation of immune functions [32–34]. DEFB118 is a newly identified human beta-defensin, which is highly expressed in the epithelial cells of different ducts and most abundant in the caput epithelium [23]. However, the exact role of DEFB118 is poorly understood. Moreover, direct isolation of the DEFB118 from human tissues is not commercially feasible because of its low quantity [35]. In the present study, the DEFB118 was obtained by using heterologous expression, and the recombinant DEFB118 was purified and fully characterized.

The recombinant DEFB118 was estimated by SDS-PAGE to be 30 kDa, and MALDI-TOF analysis indicated that its amino acid sequence is consistent with human beta-defensin 118. It is a well-known fact that the culture conditions such as the induction times and temperatures will affect the yield of protein expression for heterologous expression systems [36]. In this study, the highest yield of DEFB118 in E. coli was observed after 4 h IPTG induction. This is different from a previous study which achieved a maximal expression after 2 h induction [36]. The difference may result from the use of different bacteria strains [36]. Interestingly, antimicrobial activity assays showed that DEFB118 has significant antimicrobial activity against both the Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus and B. subtilis) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli K88 and E. coli DH5α). The MIC for DEFB118 against S. aureus and E. coli K88 was 4 mg/L, which is lower than beta defenses obtained in previous study [22]. These results are also consistent with a previous report on the DEFB118, and both results indicated that the DEFB118 had a broad spectrum of antibacterial activities [36]. There are many articles about the mechanism of human β-defensins killing bacteria. Most defensins kill bacteria by destroying the bacterial biofilm structure of bacteria [37, 38]. In the previous study of DEFB118, we found that DEFB118 destroyed the normal morphology and structure of bacteria by increasing the permeability of the bacterial membrane, causing bacterial death [36]. Importantly, hemolytic assays showed that DEFB118 had no detrimental impact on cell viability, indicating that it is safe for human use and may be tentatively used as a substitute for conventionally used antibiotics.

In addition to their antibacterial activities, evidence is accumulating to show that the β-defensins can also function as an immunomodulator for mammalian animals. For instance, human β-defensin 1, β-defensin 2, and β-defensin 3 were found to have both the anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory functions [39–42]. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) adheres to the intestinal epithelium and induces severe diarrhea and intestinal inflammation [43]. In this study, we found that DEFB118 can inhibit the adhesion of E. coli K88 to intestinal epithelial cells. This may be the reason why DEFB118 can protect the body against E. coli K88 infection. Moreover, we explored the influence of DEFB118 on inflammatory responses in the intestinal epithelial cell exposure to ETEC K88 [44]. We found that E. coli K88 challenge significantly decreased the cell viability and elevated the apoptosis rate in the PIEC-J2 cells. This is consistent with previous studies that microbial infections or stresses increase the apoptosis of the intestinal epithelial cells [45]. Interestingly, DEFB118 significantly decreased the apoptosis in the ETEC K88-challenged cells. This is probably due to the downregulation of several critical inflammatory cytokines such as the IL-1β and TNF-α. Previous study indicated that overproduction of inflammatory cytokines has resulted in changes in whole-body metabolism and disruption of the tissues such as the muscle and intestinal mucosa [46, 47]. Moreover, both the IL-1β and TNF-α can induce cell apoptosis via the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway [48, 49]. In the present study, ETEC K88 challenge significantly elevated their expression levels in the PIEC-J2 cells. However, DFEB118 treatment resulted in significant downregulation of the two critical inflammatory cytokines. The result is also consistent with previous studies on different animal species [14, 50].

Caspases are proteolytic enzymes that mediate programmed cell death (apoptosis) and are highly conserved among different species [51]. The family of caspases can be further divided into the initiator (caspases 8, 9, and 10) and executioner (caspases 3, 6, and 7) [52]. Among these executioners, caspase 3 is extremely important as both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways converge at caspase 3 [53]. In this study, E. coli K88 challenge significantly elevated the expression levels of caspase 3 in the PIEC-J2 cells, which was consistent with a previous study on piglets [54]. However, DEFB118 can downregulate the expression levels of caspase 3. This is probably due to the downregulation of inflammatory cytokines (i.e., TNF-α) since they were reported to induce apoptosis via activation of the caspase system [48, 49].

5. Conclusions

The DEFB118 shows a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activities and few hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity. Additionally, DEFB118 increases the cell viability in the intestinal epithelial cell exposure to E. coli K88, which was associated with decreased cell apoptosis and downregulation of inflammatory cytokines. The antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties of DEFB118 may allow it as a potential substitute for conventionally used antibiotics or drugs.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yaqiang Dai and Xiang Li for their help in the animal experiments. We also thank Huifen Wang and Quyuan Wang for purchasing consumables and reagents. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972599), the Development program of Sichuan Province (2018NZDZX0005), and the Youth Innovation teams of animal Feed Biotechnology of Sichuan Province (2016TD0028).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. Fig. S1: strategy of cloning of DEFB118 gene. The CDS sequence without signal peptide of DEFB118 was cloned; EcoRΙ and NotΙ were inserted in 5 and 3, respectively.

Supplementary 2. Fig. S2: results from agarose gel electrophoresis (EcoRI/Not I digestion map). (a) Digestion of the recombinant expression vectors. Lane M1 DNA marker (DL 10000), Lane 1 DEFB118 (without digestion). Lane 2 DEFB118 (digestion with EcoRI and NotI). Lane M2 DNA marker (DL 2000). (b) RT-PCR of DEFB118. Lane M DNA marker (DL 2000), Lanes 1-4 DEFB118 (production of five tubes of reaction solution).

Supplementary 3. Fig. S3: influence of DEFB118 on adhesion of E. coli K88 to IPEC-J2 cells. MacConkey agar plate was coated with serial diluted cell lysate. The number of colonies grown indicated the number of adherents of E. coli K88 to epithelial cells. (a, b) Values within a column differ if they do not share a common superscript ().

References

A. Falanga, L. Lombardi, G. Franci et al., “Marine antimicrobial peptides: nature provides templates for the design of novel compounds against pathogenic bacteria,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 785, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Aiello and E. Larson, “Antibacterial cleaning and hygiene products as an emerging risk factor for antibiotic resistance in the community,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 501–506, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Arnold, “Revenge of the killer microbe,” CMAJ, vol. 177, no. 8, pp. 895-896, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. K. Paterson, A. Hoyle, G. Ochoa, C. Bakeraustin, and N. G. H. Taylor, “Revenge of the killer microbe,” Scientific Reports, vol. 177, no. 8, pp. 895-896, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gupta, R. Sharma, and A. Kumar, “Comparative potential of simvastatin, rosuvastatin and fluvastatin against bacterial infection: an in silico and in vitro study,” Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 259–275, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gupta and A. Kumar, “Comparison of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of statin drugs: a systematic review,” Anti-Infective Agents, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 4–19, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kapoor, R. Sharma, and A. Kumar, “Repurposing of existing drugs for the bacterial infections: an in silico and in vitro study,” Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Rana, R. Sharma, and A. Kumar, “Repurposing of existing statin drugs for treatment of microbial infections: how much promising?” Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 224–237, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zasloff, “Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms,” Nature, vol. 415, no. 6870, pp. 389–395, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Lienkamp, A. E. Madkour, A. Musante, C. F. Nelson, K. Nüsslein, and G. N. Tew, “Antimicrobial polymers prepared by ROMP with unprecedented selectivity: a molecular construction kit approach,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 30, pp. 9836–9843, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kuroda and W. F. DeGrado, “Amphiphilic polymethacrylate derivatives as antimicrobial agents,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 4128-4129, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, P. He, Y. Wang et al., “Supramolecular radical anions triggered by bacteria in situ for selective photothermal therapy,” Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English), vol. 129, no. 51, pp. 16457–16460, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Selsted and A. J. Ouellette, “Mammalian defensins in the antimicrobial immune response,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 551–557, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Xie, H. Xie, G. Su et al., “β-Defensin 129 attenuates bacterial endotoxin-induced inflammation and intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 10, p. 2333, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Auvynet and Y. Rosenstein, “Multifunctional host defense peptides: antimicrobial peptides, the small yet big players in innate and adaptive immunity,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 276, no. 22, pp. 6497–6508, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yang, Z.-h. Liu, P. Tewary, Q. Chen, G. de la Rosa, and J. Oppenheim, “Defensin participation in innate and adaptive immunity,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 13, no. 30, pp. 3131–3139, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, D. Teng, R. Mao et al., “High expression of a plectasin-derived peptide NZ2114 in Pichia pastoris and its pharmacodynamics, postantibiotic and synergy against Staphylococcus aureus,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 681–694, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Mao, S. Qi, B. Yu, J. He, J. Yu, and D. Chen, “Zn2+ and L-isoleucine induce the expressions of porcine β-defensins in IPEC-J2 cells,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1547–1552, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Wei, L. C. Lin, C. F. Wang, Y. J. Lee, Y. T. Chen, and Y. D. Liao, “Antimicrobial properties of an immunomodulator - 15 kDa human granulysin,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 6, p. e0156321, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. W. Hancock, E. F. Haney, and E. E. Gill, “The immunology of host defence peptides: beyond antimicrobial activity,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 321–334, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. C. Huang and S. C. Huang, “Differential effects of statins on inflammatory interleukin-8 and antimicrobial peptide human Β-defensin 2 responses in Salmonella-infected intestinal epithelial cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 1650, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Su, K. Xie, D. Chen et al., “Differential expression, molecular cloning, and characterization of porcine beta defensin 114,” Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 60, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Kao, Y. Chen, Y. H. Zhao, and R. Wu, “ORFeome-based search of airway epithelial cell-specific novel human β-defensin genes,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yenugu, K. G. Hamil, Y. Radhakrishnan, F. S. French, and S. H. Hall, “The androgen-regulated epididymal sperm-binding protein, human β-defensin 118 (DEFB118)(formerly ESC42), is an antimicrobial β-defensin,” Endocrinology, vol. 145, no. 7, pp. 3165–3173, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang, Y. Yang, D. Teng, Z. Tian, S. Wang, and J. Wang, “Expression of plectasin in Pichia pastoris and its characterization as a new antimicrobial peptide against Staphyloccocus and Streptococcus,” Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 189–196, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yenugu, K. G. Hamil, C. E. Birse, S. M. Ruben, F. S. French, and S. H. Hall, “Antibacterial properties of the sperm-binding proteins and peptides of human epididymis 2 (HE2) family; salt sensitivity, structural dependence and their interaction with outer and cytoplasmic membranes of Escherichia coli,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 372, no. 2, pp. 473–483, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Deng, M. Cao, J. Zhang et al., “Hyaluronic acid-chitosan nanoparticles for co-delivery of MiR-34a and doxorubicin in therapy against triple negative breast cancer,” Biomaterials, vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 4333–4344, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Kusminski, J. Park, and P. E. Scherer, “MitoNEET-mediated effects on browning of white adipose tissue,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 3962, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^−ΔΔCT method,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhen, C. S. Lundborg, X. Sun, X. Hu, and H. Dong, “The clinical and economic impact of antibiotic resistance in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Antibiotics, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 115, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Haque, N. A. A. Rahman, J. McKimm et al., “Antibiotic use: a cross-sectional study evaluating the understanding, usage and perspectives of medical students and pathfinders of a public defence university in Malaysia,” Antibiotics, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 154, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, S. Qi, R. Guo, B. Yu, and D. Chen, “Different messenger RNA expression for the antimicrobial peptides β-defensins between meishan and crossbred pigs,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1633–1639, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Srisomboon, S. Poonyachoti, and C. Deachapunya, “Soy isoflavones enhance β-defensin synthesis and secretion in endometrial epithelial cells with exposure to TLR 3 agonist polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 78, no. 4, article e12694, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Qi, J. Chen, R. Guo, B. Yu, and D. Chen, “β-Defensins gene expression in tissues of the crossbred and Tibetan pigs,” Livestock Science, vol. 123, no. 2-3, pp. 161–168, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Parachin, K. C. Mulder, A. A. B. Viana, S. C. Dias, and O. L. Franco, “Expression systems for heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides,” Peptides, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 446–456, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yenugu, K. G. Hamil, Y. Radhakrishnan, F. S. French, and S. H. Hall, “The androgen-regulated epididymal sperm-binding protein, human β-defensin 118 (DEFB118) (formerly ESC42), is an antimicrobial β-defensin,” Endocrinology, vol. 145, no. 7, pp. 3165–3173, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Nehls, A. Böhling, R. Podschun et al., “Influence of disulfide bonds in human beta defensin-3 on its strain specific activity against Gram-negative bacteria,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes, vol. 1862, no. 8, p. 183273, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Sass, T. Schneider, M. Wilmes et al., “Human β-defensin 3 inhibits cell wall biosynthesis in staphylococci,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 2793–2800, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ryan and G. Diamond, “Modulation of human β-defensin-1 production by viruses,” Viruses, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 153, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kim, Y. L. Yang, S. H. Jang, and Y. S. Jang, “Human β-defensin 2 plays a regulatory role in innate antiviral immunity and is capable of potentiating the induction of antigen-specific immunity,” Virology Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 124, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Cui, J. Lyu, H. Li et al., “Human β-defensin 3 inhibits periodontitis development by suppressing inflammatory responses in macrophages,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 91, pp. 65–74, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lyu, T. Bian, B. Chen et al., “β-Defensin 3 modulates macrophage activation and orientation during acute inflammatory response to Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide,” Cytokine, vol. 92, pp. 48–54, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. Wang, Y. Li, H. Wu, S. Zhao, and Q. Yu, “Protecting intestinal epithelial cells against deoxynivalenol and E. coli damage by recombinant porcine IL-22,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 231, pp. 154–159, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Mariani, S. Palermo, S. Fiorentini, A. Lanubile, and E. Giuffra, “Gene expression study of two widely used pig intestinal epithelial cell lines: IPEC-J2 and IPI-2I,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 131, no. 3-4, pp. 278–284, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. A. Wen, X. Li, T. Goretsky, H. L. Weiss, T. A. Barrett, and T. Gao, “Loss of PHLPP protects against colitis by inhibiting intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1852, no. 10, pp. 2013–2023, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. McKAY and A. W. BAIRD, “Cytokine regulation of epithelial permeability and ion transport,” Gut, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 283–289, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Szczepankiewicz, M. Skrzypski, E. Pruszyńska-Oszmałek et al., “Interleukin 4 affects lipid metabolism and the expression of pro-inflammatory factors in mature rat adipocytes,” Immunobiology, vol. 223, no. 11, pp. 677–683, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kim, M. Xu, R. Xo et al., “Mitochondrial DNA damage is involved in apoptosis caused by pro-inflammatory cytokines in human OA chondrocytes,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 424–432, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. G. Grunnet, R. Aikin, M. F. Tonnesen et al., “Proinflammatory cytokines activate the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in -cells,” Diabetes, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1807–1815, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rodriguez, M. Ø. Pedersen, E. Villegas et al., “Antimicrobial activity and structure of a consensus human β-defensin and its comparison to a novel putative hBD10,” Proteins, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 175–186, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Simone, “Therapeutic opportunities based on caspase modulation,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, vol. 82, pp. 150–157, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. G. Ramirez and G. S. Salvesen, “A primer on caspase mechanisms,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, vol. 82, pp. 79–85, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Snigdha, E. D. Smith, G. A. Prieto, and C. W. Cotman, “Caspase-3 activation as a bifurcation point between plasticity and cell death,” Neuroscience Bulletin, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xia, P. Bin, S. Liu et al., “Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection promotes apoptosis in piglets,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 125, pp. 290–294, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Qian Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

874

Downloads

1260

Citations