Biotechnology Research International

Biotechnology Research International / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 818472 |

Eliud Sagwa Mulanda, Mark Ochieng Adero, Nelson Onzere Amugune, Elijah Akunda, Jenesio I. Kinyamario, "High-Frequency Regeneration of the Drought-Tolerant Tree Melia volkensii Gurke Using Low-Cost Agrochemical Thidiazuron", Biotechnology Research International, vol. 2012, Article ID 818472, 5 pages, 2012.

High-Frequency Regeneration of the Drought-Tolerant Tree Melia volkensii Gurke Using Low-Cost Agrochemical Thidiazuron

Academic Editor: Yau Hung Chen
Received28 Sep 2012
Accepted29 Oct 2012
Published27 Nov 2012


Melia volkensii Gurke is a drought-tolerant tree native to East Africa’s arid and semiarid lands (ASALs), with vast but underutilized potential for agroforestry and sustainable livelihoods in the ASALs. Its cultivation is limited by difficulties in propagation via conventional means. Full exploitation of the ability of thidiazuron (TDZ) to elicit regeneration in plant tissue cultures, as sole plant growth regulator (PGR), is hampered by high costs. This study tested the effectiveness of a low-cost agrochemical TDZ for in vitro propagation of M. volkensii. Zygotic embryos from mature seeds were cultured on Gamborg’s B5 medium containing 0 to 4 mg/L of agrochemical TDZ from Kingtai Chemicals Co.,Ltd., China. Callus induction frequency was 96.67 to 100%. Significantly large callus fresh mass was produced at 0.05 mg/L TDZ concentration (ANOVA, ). The effect of TDZ on embryogenicity was significant over certain ranges of concentrations (Anova, ). Multiple somatic embryos developed within 14 days of subculture to hormone-free B5 medium. Somatic embryos developed into microshoots which elongated when transferred to MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine plus 10% coconut water. The Kingtai-TDZ showed a high potency and suitability for use in M. volkensii tissue culture.

1. Introduction

Melia volkensii Gurke (Meliaceae: mahogany family) is a drought-tolerant, fast-growing multipurpose tree indigenous to the arid and semiarid lands (ASALs) of East Africa [1, 2]. Its other desirable properties include coppicing ability, termite-resistant wood, and suitability for dry land agro-forestry and bee-keeping [3]. It can be cultivated commercially for valuable mahogany timber, insect repellants, and larvicidal and medicinal compounds [4, 5]. Muok et al. [6] estimated the timber related income from a 10 to 15 year plantation of M. volkensii to be Ksh 3 million (~US$ 35,294) per hectare.

The species has been overexploited for its valuable timber [68], and there is an urgent need for conservation interventions. Among the suggested conservation strategies is the domestication of the species in agroforestry systems [9, 10]. However, propagation of the species via seed is constrained by difficulties in seed extraction, poor germination, and high post-germination mortality [6, 11, 12]. Propagation by stem cuttings is also reported to be difficult [2, 12]. In view of these difficulties, there is need for tissue culture protocols for mass propagation and wider dissemination of the species.

There are limited reports on tissue culture of M. volkensii. Indieka et al. [11] described direct somatic embryogenesis from mature seed cotyledonary explants using Murashige and Skoog’s [13] MS medium supplemented with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) at 0.5–4.0 mg/L and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) at 0.2 mg/L. 60% of the cotyledon explants formed somatic embryos after 4 weeks in culture. The highest yield of somatic embryos was 14 per explant. However, zygotic embryos cultured on the same media failed to produce somatic embryos.

The ability of TDZ (phenyl-1,2,3-thidiazol-5-yl-urea) to induce shoot organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in 55 plant families, as the sole PGR, has attracted attention [14]. The use of TDZ simplifies and speeds up the regeneration process by avoiding the use of combinations of plant growth regulators. However, TDZ from conventional suppliers of plant tissue culture media remains expensive, hence the need for identification and testing of new low-cost sources of this useful PGR. Plant-culture-tested Sigma Aldrich-TDZ (99% purity) costs € 2,025 for 0.5 g. In contrast, 700 g of the agrochemical TDZ used in the present study, manufactured by Kingtai Chemicals Co.,Ltd., China, for use as cotton or peanut defoliant, costed only US$ 160 inclusive of freight (E. Mulanda, University of Nairobi, Kenya, personal communication, 2012).

To our knowledge, there are no reports on the use of such agrochemical TDZ in a tissue culture of M. volkensii. There are also no reports on TDZ-mediated regeneration of M. volkensii from zygotic embryos or other explant types.

2. Materials and Methods

Mature fruits were collected in February 2012 from wild trees in Mavuria provenance in Mbeere district, Embu county in Eastern Kenya, between the earth coordinates (0° 46.379′S;37° 39.308′E) and (0° 46.406′S;37° 39.325′E). Zygotic embryos excised from the seeds were surface sterilized by shaking for 15 minutes in 10% Jik commercial bleach (packed concentration: 3.85% m/v sodium hypochlorite), with 2 drops of the detergent Teepol added as surfactant. The embryos were then rinsed three times with sterile water to remove the sterilant.

Callus induction media was Gamborg et al.’s [15] B5 basal salts plus Murashige and Skoog’s [13] vitamins, supplemented with 20 g/L sucrose and 12 g/L oxoid agar. Kingtai-TDZ was added at eight different concentrations: 0, 0.05, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/L. The pH was adjusted to 5.80 ± 0.1 and 50 mL of the media dispensed into 340 mL culture bottles. The tops of the bottles were covered with double-layer aluminium foil and the media autoclaved for 20 minutes at 1.06 kg cm−2 steam pressure (121°C). Inoculation was done in a laminar flow cabinet with 3 replicate bottles per TDZ treatment, each having 5 zygotic embryos. The experiment was repeated three times.

Cultures were incubated at maximum/minimum room temperatures of 29.8 ± 0.8 and 25.5 ± 0.1°C, fluorescent light of approximately 60 μmol photons m−2 s−1, and a 16-hour photoperiod. After 21 days on induction media, callus score and fresh mass were determined and the callus masses subcultured to hormone-free B5 medium for induction and growth of somatic embryos.

Callus masses with well-developed green and leafy somatic embryos were transferred to 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/L BAP for conversion of the embryos into microshoots. Well-defined microshoots were separated from the callus masses and grown in 1/2 MS medium with 0.1 mg/L or 1 mg/L BAP plus 10% (v/v) coconut water for elongation. Shoots of 2.5 cm length or more were transferred to 1/2 MS medium with 0.05 to 4 mg/L indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) for rooting.

Photographs of early stages of regeneration were taken with a Keyence (Z35) VHX Digital Scanning Microscope. Elongated microshoots were imaged using a Sony digital camera (Model DSC-W390). Data was analyzed using SPSS version 17 software.

3. Results and Discussion

Zygotic embryos were swollen after 3 to 4 days in culture. Explants started to callus from day 4 forming a compact, nodular, cream callus. Callus induction occurred at a very high frequency (96.7% to 100%) in all treatments including the control (Table 1), suggesting that callogenesis in mature embryos of M. volkensii may be independent of exogenous application of TDZ. The high frequency of callus induction on control media was unexpected. This suggests that endogenous levels of PGRs in mature zygotic embryos of M. volkensii may be adequate for callus induction.

TDZ concentration
Total explants % callus induction
(mean ± SE)
Fresh mass per callus (mg)
(mean ± SE)
% of callus with somatic embryos††
(mean ± SE)

045100 ± 0.00a156.44 ± 40.45b0a
0.0545100 ± 0.00a304.87 ± 22.22a96.67 ± 3.34b
0.12545100 ± 0.00a124.67 ± 16.65b90.00 ± 10.00b
0.2545100 ± 0.00a157.11 ± 17.97b76.67 ± 3.34b
0.5045100 ± 0.00a159.67 ± 45.86b70.00 ± 3.33b
1.045100 ± 0.00a122.48 ± 26.30b60.00 ± 6.67b
2.045100 ± 0.00a111.33 ± 22.04b53.33 ± 0.00c
4.04596.67 ± 3.34a100.11 ± 23.38b33.33 ± 16.67ac

Data recorded after 21 days of culture on B5 medium containing TDZ. ††Data obtained 30 days after transfer to hormone-free B5 medium ( ). Values with the same superscript do not differ significantly using Tukey’s HSD test at .

Only 0.05 mg/L TDZ concentration had a significant effect on callus fresh mass ( test; ) (Table 1), after 21 days on induction medium. The callus fresh mass produced at 0.05 mg/L was double or up to three times larger than the callus masses obtained in the absence of TDZ or at concentrations greater than 0.05 mg/L. There are no previous reports on the effect of TDZ on callogenesis in the genus Melia as Vila et al. [16, 17] attained direct somatic embryogenesis without an intervening callus phase from immature embryos of Melia azedarach L. (Meliaceae) cultured on MS medium plus 0.45 or 4.54 μM TDZ.

Sixty to 80% of callus (data not provided) in the present study was nonmorphogenic on TDZ medium and only developed somatic embryos when transferred to the hormone-free B5 medium. However, callus formed in the absence of TDZ failed to form somatic embryos (Table 1), suggesting that TDZ is crucial for the observed morphogenesis. TDZ concentration also had a significant effect on the percentage of callus-forming somatic embryos ( test; ), with optimal response at 0.05 mg/L (Table 1). This is in agreement with earlier reports showing very low concentrations of TDZ as favorable for shoot morphogenesis in a number of plants [14, 16, 17].

In the present study, the formation of somatic embryos was preceded by the greening of the callus at one, two, or three focal points before spreading to the rest of the callus. These green foci developed multiple green somatic embryos (Figure 1(a)). These embryos developed into leafy microshoots (Figure 1(b)) which developed further into well-defined multiple shoots (Figure 2(a)) when transferred to the hormone-free B5 medium. A microshoot regeneration frequency of 24.25 ± 9.34 per callus was obtained (data not provided).

The findings of this study with respect to the embryogenic ability of TDZ are in conformity to those of Vila et al. [16, 17] which attained efficient regeneration via somatic embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos of M. azedarach L. on MS medium with low concentrations of TDZ as the sole PGR. This suggests the usefulness of TDZ as an alternative to the use of combinations of auxins and cytokinins in somatic embryogenesis, as reported in many plant species [14, 18, 19]. The reported inability by Indieka et al. [11] to attain somatic embryogenesis from mature zygotic embryos of M. volkensii using BAP and 2,4-D may be attributed to the failure to attain the correct ratio of the two PGRs. TDZ use avoids such problems.

In the present study, shoots regenerated using TDZ failed to elongate when subcultured to either B5 or 1/2 MS with no PGRs and only elongated when transferred to media containing either 0.1 mg/L BAP alone or in combination with 5 or 10% coconut water (Table 2 and Figure 2(b)). This finding conforms to earlier reports on the inhibitory effect of TDZ on shoot elongation [14, 19, 20] and the suggestion that TDZ-induced inhibition can be removed by subculturing the shoots to media containing another cytokinin, in particular zeatin or BAP [20]. In this study, gibberellic acid was unsuitable for elongation of the microshoots as it resulted in fasciated shoots with morphological and physiological defects such as coiled, unusually thick stems, failure of leaf expansion, and creeping of some stems along the surface of the media in what appeared as inability to show the normal phototropic or geotropic responses. Such TDZ-induced shoot fasciation has been reported in other plants [14, 21, 22].

GA (mg/L)Coconut water
% of explants with shoots ≥2.0 cm
(mean ± SE)
Days takenPhenotypic appearance

0000.00 ± 0.00a35Stunted with callusing of stem bases
01.0052.08 ± 6.61b35Shoots fasciated, with thick stems
0.10052.00 ± 8.33b35Shoots normal but elongation slow
0.10.1070.17 ± 10.67b31Shoots fasciated, twisted thick stems
0.101081.25 ± 5.54b35Normal, multiple shoots formed

Values with the same superscript do not differ significantly using Tukey’s HSD test at ( ).

Work on rooting of shoots is still in progress. Callusing of stem bases, yellowing, and abscission of lower leaves were observed in this study when shoots were planted into media containing 0.05 to 1.00 mg/L IBA (data not provided). Some rooting was attained at 0.2 mg/L IBA, but the roots also callused. This probably indicates that the concentrations of IBA used in this study may be supraoptimal and that much lower concentrations of auxin may be required as suggested for M. azedarach L. by Sharry and Silva [23].

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

This study offers the possibility of a simple, rapid, and reproducible protocol for in vitro propagation of M. volkensii from mature zygotic embryos. The high frequency of shoot regeneration attained in this study may be applied in clonal production of planting stock, production of synthetic seeds, genetic transformation, and in vitro conservation of germ plasm. This study also demonstrates the high potency and usefulness of the low-cost Kingtai-TDZ in plant tissue culture. Further work is in progress to achieve rooting and growth of plantlets to normal plants. We recommend further testing of this agrochemical TDZ on more plant species and a variety of explants, as one means of cutting costs in plant tissue culture.


This research was funded by a Research Grant availed to the first author by the Kenya National Council for Science and Technology. We are also grateful to Ms. Sophia Huang, Kingtai Chemicals Co., Ltd. for assistance in raising the agrochemical TDZ purity to 97.4%.


  1. T. Blomley, “Indigenous agroforestry: Melia volkensii in Kenya,” Agroforestry Today, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 10–11, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  2. M. Stewart and T. Blomley, “Use of Melia volkensii in a semi-arid agroforestry system in Kenya,” Commonwealth Forestry Review, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 128–131, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  3. ICRAF, A Selection of Useful Trees and Shrubs for Kenya: Notes on Their Identification, Propagation and Management for Use by Farming and Pastoral Communities, International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya, 1992.
  4. R. W. Mwangi, J. M. Kabaru, and H. Rembold, “Potential for Melia volkensii fruit extract in the control of locusts,” in New Strategies in Locust Control, R. Peveling and D. BeDiallo, Eds., pp. 193–200, Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  5. C. Orwa, A. Mutua, R. Kindt, R. Jamnadass, and A. Simons, “Melia volkensii. Agroforestry Database: a tree reference and selection guide,” 2009, View at: Google Scholar
  6. B. Muok, A. Mwamburi, E. Kyalo, and S. Auka, Growing Melia volkensii—A Guide for Farmers and Tree Growers in the Drylands, vol. 3, Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI) Information Bulletin, Nairobi, Kenya, 2010.
  7. S. Hanaoka, G. M. Muturi, and A. Watanabe, “Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers in Melia volkensii Gurke,” Conservation Genetic Resources, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 395–398, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. S. Runo, G. M. Muluvi, and D. W. Odee, “Analysis of genetic structure in Melia volkensii (Gurke) populations using random amplified polymorphic DNA,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 421–425, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. G. Kariuki, J. M. Kimondo, B. K. Kigwa, and M. T. E. Mbuvi, “Melia volkensii in Kenya: current domestication and improvement programme,” Progress Report of a Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI), Kenya Forest Service (KFS)/Belgian Technical Cooperation (BTC)/Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  10. P. B. Milimo, J. M. Dick, and R. Munro, “Domestication of trees in semi arid East Africa, the current situation,” in Tropical Trees: The Potential for Domestication and Rebuilding of Forest Resources, R. R. B. Leakey and A. C. Newton, Eds., ITE Symposium, 29, pp. 210–219, HMSO, London, UK, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  11. S. A. Indieka, D. W. Odee, G. M. Muluvi, K. N. Rao, and J. Machuka, “Regeneration of Melia volkensii Gürke (Meliaceae) through direct somatic embryogenesis,” New Forests, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. E. Kyalo, “An overview of Melia volkensii propagation at Tiva nursery, Kitui District,” in Research and Teachnology Development of Mukau (Melia Volkensii Gurke), B. M. Kamondo, J. M. Kimondo, J. M. Mulatya, and G. M. Muturi, Eds., Proceedings of the First National Workshop on Melia volkensii Held at Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI) Kitui Regional Research Centre from 16th to 19th November 2004, pp. 23–24, Muguga, KEFRI/Japanese International CooperationAgency (JICA), Nairobi, Kenya. View at: Google Scholar
  13. T. Murashige and F. Skoog, “A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures,” Physiology Plant, vol. 15, pp. 473–497, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  14. B. Guo, B. H. Abbasi, A. Zeb, L. L. Xu, and Y. H. Wei, “Thidiazuron: a multidimensional plant growth regulator—review,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 45, pp. 8984–9000, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  15. O. L. Gamborg, R. A. Miller, and K. Ojima, “Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 151–158, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. Vila, A. Gonzalez, H. Rey, and L. Mroginski, “Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature zygotic embryos of Melia azedarach (Meliaceae),” In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 283–287, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Vila, A. Gonzalez, H. Rey, and L. Mroginski, “Effect of morphological heterogeneity of somatic embryos of Melia azedarach on conversion into plants,” Biocell, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  18. B. N. Murthy, S. J. Murch, and P. K. Saxena, “Thidiazuron-induced somatic embryogenesis in intact seedlings of peanut (Arachis hypogeal L.): endogenous growth regulator levels and significance of cotyledons,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 268–276, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. N. S. Murthy, S. J. Murch, and P. K. Saxena, “Thidiazuron: a potent regulator of in vitro plant morphogenesis,” In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology, vol. 34, pp. 267–275, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  20. S. C. Debnath, “A two-step procedure for adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro-derived lingonberry leaves: shoot induction with TDZ and shoot elongation using zeatin,” HortScience, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 189–192, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. J. Bosela and C. H. Michler, “Media effects on black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) shoot culture growth in vitro: evaluation of multiple nutrient formulations and cytokinin types,” In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 316–329, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. J. Ruzic, T. Vujovic, D. Nikolic, and R. Cerovic, “In vitro growth responses of the Pyrodwarf pear root stock to cytokinin types,” Romanian Biotechnological Letters, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 6631–6637, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  23. S. E. Sharry and J. A. T. Silva, “Effective organogenesis, somatic embryogenesis and salt tolerance induction in vitro in Persian lilac tree (Melia azedarach L.),” in Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology Volume II, S. Sharry and J. A. Teixeira da Silva, Eds., chapter 43, pp. 318–324, Global Science Books, 2006. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Eliud Sagwa Mulanda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are experiencing issues with article search and journal table of contents. We are working on a fix as to remediate it and apologise for the inconvenience.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.