Recent Advances in Brain Signal Analysis: Methods and ApplicationsView this Special Issue
Research Article | Open Access
Hong Gi Yeom, June Sic Kim, Chun Kee Chung, "Macroscopic Neural Oscillation during Skilled Reaching Movements in Humans", Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2016, Article ID 2714052, 8 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2714052
Macroscopic Neural Oscillation during Skilled Reaching Movements in Humans
The neural mechanism of skilled movements, such as reaching, has been considered to differ from that of rhythmic movement such as locomotion. It is generally thought that skilled movements are consciously controlled by the brain, while rhythmic movements are usually controlled autonomously by the spinal cord and brain stem. However, several studies in recent decades have suggested that neural networks in the spinal cord may also be involved in the generation of skilled movements. Moreover, a recent study revealed that neural activities in the motor cortex exhibit rhythmic oscillations corresponding to movement frequency during reaching movements as rhythmic movements. However, whether the oscillations are generated in the spinal cord or the cortical circuit in the motor cortex causes the oscillations is unclear. If the spinal cord is involved in the skilled movements, then similar rhythmic oscillations with time delays should be found in macroscopic neural activity. We measured whole-brain MEG signals during reaching. The MEG signals were analyzed using a dynamical analysis method. We found that rhythmic oscillations with time delays occur in all subjects during reaching movements. The results suggest that the corticospinal system is involved in the generation and control of the skilled movements as rhythmic movements.
The neural mechanism of skilled movements has been considered to differ from that of rhythmic movement . Skilled movements, such as reaching and grasping, are nonperiodic and are consciously controlled by the brain, while rhythmic movements such as locomotion are repetitive and stereotypical. Although rhythmic movements can be controlled voluntarily, these movements are usually controlled autonomously by the spinal cord and brain stem. A central pattern generator (CPG) in the spinal cord produces periodic oscillatory patterns [1, 2]. The CPG has been considered to be associated with the control of rhythmic movement [3–5].
However, it has been suggested that not only the cortical circuit but also the neural networks in the spinal cord may be involved in skilled movements [6–12]. Moreover, Rokni and Sompolinsky demonstrated that various natural movements can be generated by the linear summation of simple oscillatory components . When considering Fourier theory, it is reasonable to presume that all of the complicated signals can be approximated by the linear summation of sine and cosine signals . The suggestion of generating the various movements from simple components also corresponds to the perspective of dynamic systems, suggesting that most neural activity in the motor cortex will be internal processes that drive desired movements . A recent study reported an important phenomenon. The study, based on neural dynamical analysis, demonstrated that rhythmic oscillations corresponding to the movement frequency also occur during skilled reaching movements  as rhythmic movements [16–19]. This implies that diverse skilled movements can be generated via CPG, similar to the neural mechanism of rhythmic movements.
However, in the previous study, a very small motor area in a monkey was measured at a microscopic level. Therefore, whether the rhythmic oscillations are generated in CPG or the cortical circuit in the motor cortex causes the oscillations is unclear. Moreover, the occurrence of the rhythmic oscillations corresponding to the movement frequency has not been confirmed in humans.
Various pathways connect the cortex and spinal cord. The direct corticomotoneuronal (CM) pathway connects the motor cortex to spinal motoneurons. Indirect pathways might connect other sensorimotor cortices, such as the premotor (PM), supplementary (SMA), cingulate (CMA), and primary somatosensory (S1) areas, to the spinal cord . Therefore, if the rhythmic oscillations occur from the spinal cord and are delivered to the broad motor-related cortex, similar rhythmic oscillations with time delays should be found in macroscopic neural activity (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). Here, we examine whether similar rhythmic oscillations with time delays are exhibited in macroscopic neural activity during reaching movements in humans. To investigate neural activity, we measured whole-brain MEG signals during reaching movements. We analyze the MEG signals using an analysis method, j principle component analysis (jPCA), where j implies an imaginary part in a complex conjugate. The method reveals the dynamical characteristics of the neural activity . If there are similar oscillatory patterns with time delay, the projections of the oscillations onto the jPC planes will be rotated. Therefore, we can easily investigate whether similar rhythmic oscillations occur or not by examining the projections. Moreover, the results will indicate whether the rhythmic oscillations occur from spinal cords or not.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experiment and Data Acquisition
Nine healthy subjects (age: 19–37 years; five males and four females) participated in the experiment. All subjects were right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory scores were above 80). A 306-channel whole-head MEG system (VectorView™, Elekta Neuromag Oy, Helsinki, Finland) was used to measure neural activity during reaching movements (Figure 1(a)). The MEG system has 306 sensors grouped in triplets consisting of 2 planar gradiometers and 1 magnetometer distributed at 102 locations. To record arm position, a three-axis accelerometer (KXM52, Kionix, NY, USA) was attached to the index finger of the right hand using the Velcro band. The accelerometer signals were recorded simultaneously with the MEG signals. The sampling frequency of the MEG and the accelerometer signals was 600.615 Hz. The experiment was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University Hospital (IRB number 1105-095-363). Subjects were instructed to perform a center-out reaching task according to stereographic images on a screen. To minimize movement artifacts, a cushion was placed under the subject’s elbow during the experiment.
At the beginning of the experiments, a sphere was shown on the center of the screen for 4 s and a target sphere with a stick connecting it to the center sphere was presented on one corner for 1 s. The target sphere appeared randomly on one of the four corners (upper-left, upper-right, bottom-left, and bottom-right). During this time, the subjects were instructed to shift their index finger from the center to the target and return to the center according to the connecting line by moving their right arm as fast as possible (Figure 1(b)). This sequence was repeated during the experiments. For each subject, 60 trials were measured for each direction. The distances from the center to the target were ~20 cm. Because we used stereographic images to represent the target, the distance measurement was not accurate. The distances from the center to the target were identical in all subjects. Because the directions of the target were randomly presented, we did not consider the variation of the intertrial interval for habituation effects. Although the reaction times were slightly different (see Section 3), there is no strange trial. Further details are also described elsewhere [21, 22].
2.2. Signal Preprocessing
The MEG equipment measures the changes of a magnetic field. Therefore, it is influenced by external signals, such as line noise, and biological artifacts, such as cardiac and muscle activity. To reduce the noise in the MEG signals, the spatiotemporal signal space separation (tSSS) method was applied . The tSSS separates external interference signals of the brain by spatiotemporal methods and eliminates the interference. All data processing was performed using MATLAB 2008b (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA). We used 204 gradiometer signals among the 306 channels for data analysis because the characteristics of the gradiometer and magnetometer sensors differ and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the gradiometers is better than that of the magnetometers . The MEG signals were band-pass filtered between 0.5 and 8 Hz. The filtering band was determined by time-frequency analysis based on our previous study . The MEG signals of the frequency band represent the characteristics of reaching movements . To minimize artifacts, independent component analysis (ICA) was applied, which is implemented in EEGLAB . Artifacts such as EOG were removed by eliminating the artifact components. The signals were segmented from −1 to 2 s after the cue onset. After the segmentation, the MEG signals were averaged by trials. The averaged MEG signals were downsampled to 50 Hz. jPCA was applied to the preprocessed signals. The process of the analysis is explained in the next section and in Figure 2.
2.3. Dynamical Analysis jPCA
Neural networks in the brain consist of billions of neurons. Although the activities of some neurons in the motor cortex will reflect movement parameters, most neural activities will be an internal process to generate the motor commands . Therefore, the signals are difficult to analyze because the patterns of neural activity are various and complex. To investigate the neural process, a dynamical analysis method, jPCA, was proposed . jPCA describes the dynamical relationship between current and subsequent neural activities on a low-dimensional plane. It represents the dynamic relationship with rotation according to the time flow. If there are consistent phase-differences between neural activities, the projections on the jPC planes will be rotated; however, if there is no consistent change, meaningless small movements will be shown. Moreover, if the sign of the phase-difference changes, the projections will be rotated in the opposite direction. This reveals the change in the dynamic relationship between the current and subsequent neural activities. jPCA is an intuitive method of analyzing the dynamic characteristics of neural activities. jPCA finds informative planes and projects the neural data onto the planes. The projected neural data represents the rotational structure in the data.
The relationship between the current and next neural activities can be expressed as follows:where is a matrix of size describing the neural activities. The preprocessed MEG signals as described in Section 2.2 were applied to jPCA as . is the number of MEG channels (). is the number of conditions (), and is the number of time points (). is a derivative of and represents the relationship between the neural activity and its derivative.
jPCA applies the traditional principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce the dimensionality of from to (). The reduced neural activity will be expressed as . Equation (1) can be represented as follows: can be calculated by linear regression. is a combination of symmetric transformation and skew transformation. can be divided as follows:where and are defined as and .
Equation (2) can be expressed as follows:
Because has imaginary eigenvalues, it captures the rotational dynamics of neural activity. To express complex eigenvectors and of on a real plane, the jPC can be defined as and .
The projection onto the jPC can be calculated as . Further details are provided in .
Figure 3 shows a simple rhythmic oscillation model that draws a circle on jPC planes and results from jPCA. To draw a circle on jPC planes as in Figure 3(c), the rhythmic oscillations of jPC1 and jPC2 should have a similar pattern. Moreover, the time difference between oscillations should be consistent as in Figure 3(b). Figure 3(d) illustrates jPCs and root-mean square (RMS) of the accelerometer signals over time. Projections on jPC planes are also shown at 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ms in Figure 3(e). The different colors of the signals represent the movements of different directions. 0 ms indicates the stimulus onset time. The average movement onset was ms (mean ± standard deviation) from stimulus onset. In contrast, the rhythmic oscillations began at ms. We compared the onset times between the movements and the rhythmic oscillations using a paired t-test. The onsets differed significantly () between the movements and the rhythmic oscillations. After the presentation of visual stimuli, the rhythmic oscillations of jPCs occurred before arm movements, as shown in Figure 3(d). Projections on jPC planes show clearer results. Before movement onset, the projections of the neural oscillations were rotated.
Figure 4 shows the projections on jPC planes for each subject from −100 to 300 ms after presentation of visual stimuli. The duration corresponds to the time taken for movement preparation. The projection of the oscillation rotated in the same direction (counterclockwise) for all conditions (reaching different directions) for all subjects. To rotate in the same direction for different conditions, the relation between jPC1 and jPC2 should be invariant irrespective of the movement direction.
Table 1 shows a summary of jPCA. The second row describes the data variance captured by jPC plane. The mean of the data variance was . The third row is fit quality provided by , in the first two jPCs. The mean of the fit quality from two jPCs was .
In this study, we demonstrated that the neural mechanisms of rhythmic movements and skilled movements are similar. We showed that the corticospinal system is involved in the generation of skilled movements by means of a dynamic analysis of macroscopic neural data. Although our result does not concur with previous knowledge, it supports the suggestion made in recent studies that the spinal cord mediates skilled movements [6–12].
4.1. Neural Mechanism of Skilled Movements
It is unclear whether the rhythmic oscillations are generated in the spinal cord or in the motor cortex. We hypothesize that if the rhythmic oscillations are derived by the corticospinal system, oscillations with similar pattern and consistent time delay should be found in macroscopic neural activity (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). To investigate this hypothesis, we measured and analyzed MEG signals during reaching movements in humans. The results showed that projections on the jPC planes rotated in all subjects (Figure 4). This means that the major components of the neural activity have a similar pattern and consistent time delay. Therefore, it implies the possibility that skilled movements are generated by the corticospinal system. Moreover, the projection of the oscillation rotated in the same direction for all conditions. This suggests that the same neural dynamics are involved in reaching movements, irrespective of reaching direction.
Our perspective corresponds to the suggestion of a common intrinsic structure controlling the reaching movements [16, 26]. When we consider that the cortex also contributes to controlling rhythmic movements [7, 27], the neural mechanisms of rhythmic movements and skilled movements are similar.
Despite numerous studies of a CPG in animals, almost all studies in humans used indirect results . We also did not measure spinal cord activity directly. Therefore, we should be cautious when interpreting the results. Nevertheless, our results provide evidence that the corticospinal system is involved in skilled movement, such as rhythmic movement.
4.2. Neural Oscillations Involved in Movement Generations
Iteration of descending motor commands and ascending sensory feedback could be represented by rhythmic patterns. Therefore, the rhythmic oscillations could be considered products generated by sensory feedback, such as kinematic parameter or visual feedback [28–32]. However, our results show that the rhythmic oscillation occurred prior to movement onset (Figures 3(d), 3(e), and 4). Because sensory feedback could not generate the oscillations before the movements, it implies that there is another mechanism of generating the rhythmic oscillations. It has been suggested that neural networks in the spinal cord may also be involved in skilled movements. We hypothesized that if the rhythmic oscillations are made by CPG and delivered to the broad motor-related area through direct and indirect pathways, similar patterns of time delay will be observed at a macroscopic level. We verified our hypothesis using the dynamical analysis method. Therefore, our results suggest that the spinal cord could be involved in the movement generation.
When a subject is aware of a target position in a motor planning task, the reaction time required to reach the target after the go cue was about 240 ms . Because the visual processing requires less than 150 ms , and the execution-related time will be about 90 ms. In our experiment, the movement onset time (316 ms) may include the time for visual processing, motor planning, and execution. Therefore, the difference (76 ms) between 316 ms and 240 ms is related to motor planning. Thus, 166 ms (76 + 90 ms) may be required for movement planning and execution. The rhythmic oscillation occurred 183 ms (316 − 133 ms) prior to movement onset, suggesting that the rhythmic oscillations are related to movement generation.
We showed that neural oscillations occur at a macroscopic level in humans during skilled movements. It seems that a common intrinsic structure generates the oscillations, irrespective of movement direction. The intrinsic structure is involved in not only movement execution but also movement generation. The neural oscillations could be generated in the spinal cord and the oscillations might influence movements by means of corticospinal interaction. This implies that the neural mechanism of skilled movements might be similar to that of rhythmic movements.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This study was supported by Grant (NRCTR-EX15002) of the Translational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots, Korea National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea.
- E. R. Kandel, Principles of Neural Science, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 5th edition, 2013.
- K. G. Pearson, “Common principles of motor control in vertebrates and invertebrates,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 16, pp. 265–297, 1993.
- M. MacKay-Lyons, “Central pattern generation of locomotion: a review of the evidence,” Physical Therapy, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 69–83, 2002.
- E. Marder and D. Bucher, “Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements,” Current Biology, vol. 11, no. 23, pp. R986–R996, 2001.
- E. Marder and R. L. Calabrese, “Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 687–717, 1996.
- B. Alstermark and T. Isa, “Circuits for skilled reaching and grasping,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 35, pp. 559–578, 2012.
- T. Drew, S. Prentice, and B. Schepens, “Cortical and brainstem control of locomotion,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 143, pp. 251–261, 2004.
- A. P. Georgopoulos and S. Grillner, “Visuomotor coordination in reaching and locomotion,” Science, vol. 245, no. 4923, pp. 1209–1210, 1989.
- E. Azim, J. Jiang, B. Alstermark, and T. M. Jessell, “Skilled reaching relies on a V2a propriospinal internal copy circuit,” Nature, vol. 508, no. 7496, pp. 357–363, 2014.
- B. Alstermark, L. G. Pettersson, Y. Nishimura et al., “Motor command for precision grip in the macaque monkey can be mediated by spinal interneurons,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 122–126, 2011.
- B. Alstermark, T. Isa, L.-G. Pettersson, and S. Sasaki, “The C3-C4 propriospinal system in the cat and monkey: a spinal pre-motoneuronal centre for voluntary motor control,” Acta Physiologica, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 123–140, 2007.
- T. Isa, Y. Ohki, B. Alstermark, L.-G. Pettersson, and S. Sasaki, “Direct and indirect cortico-motoneuronal pathways and control of hand/arm movements,” Physiology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 145–153, 2007.
- U. Rokni and H. Sompolinsky, “How the brain generates movement,” Neural Computation, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 289–331, 2012.
- R. N. Bracewell, The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass, USA, 3rd edition, 2000.
- K. V. Shenoy, M. Sahani, and M. M. Churchland, “Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 36, pp. 337–359, 2013.
- M. M. Churchland, J. P. Cunningham, M. T. Kaufman et al., “Neural population dynamics during reaching,” Nature, vol. 486, no. 7405, pp. 51–56, 2012.
- W. B. Kristan Jr. and R. L. Calabrese, “Rhythmic swimming activity in neurones of the isolated nerve cord of the leech,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 643–668, 1976.
- K. L. Briggman and W. B. Kristan Jr., “Imaging dedicated and multifunctional neural circuits generating distinct behaviors,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 42, pp. 10925–10933, 2006.
- K. L. Briggman, H. D. I. Abarbanel, and W. B. Kristan Jr., “Optical imaging of neuronal populations during decision-making,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5711, pp. 896–901, 2005.
- T. Isa, M. Kinoshita, and Y. Nishimura, “Role of direct vs. indirect pathways from the motor cortex to spinal motoneurons in the control of hand dexterity,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 4, article 191, 2013.
- H. G. Yeom, J. S. Kim, and C. K. Chung, “Estimation of the velocity and trajectory of three-dimensional reaching movements from non-invasive magnetoencephalography signals,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 10, no. 2, Article ID 026006, 2013.
- H. G. Yeom, J. S. Kim, and C. K. Chung, “Common neural mechanism for reaching movements,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI '16), pp. 1–3, Gangwon Province, Republic of Korea, Feburary 2016.
- S. Taulu and J. Simola, “Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1759–1768, 2006.
- M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R. J. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, and O. V. Lounasmaa, “Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 413–497, 1993.
- A. Delorme and S. Makeig, “EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2004.
- T. M. Hall, F. de Carvalho, and A. Jackson, “A common structure underlies low-frequency cortical dynamics in movement, sleep, and sedation,” Neuron, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1185–1199, 2014.
- T. Drew, J.-E. Andujar, K. Lajoie, and S. Yakovenko, “Cortical mechanisms involved in visuomotor coordination during precision walking,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 199–211, 2008.
- M. R. Dimitrijevic, Y. Gerasimenko, and M. M. Pinter, “Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 860, pp. 360–376, 1998.
- K. J. Craik, “Theory of the human operator in control systems; the operator as an engineering system,” The British Journal of Psychology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 56–61, 1947.
- R. C. Miall, D. J. Weir, and J. F. Stein, “Manual tracking of visual targets by trained monkeys,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 185–201, 1986.
- R. C. Miall, D. J. Weir, and J. F. Stein, “Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks,” Journal of Motor Behavior, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 1993.
- R. C. Miall and J. K. Jackson, “Adaptation to visual feedback delays in manual tracking: evidence against the Smith Predictor model of human visually guided action,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2006.
- C. A. Chestek, A. P. Batista, G. Santhanam et al., “Single-neuron stability during repeated reaching in macaque premotor cortex,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 40, pp. 10742–10750, 2007.
- S. Thorpe, D. Fize, and C. Marlot, “Speed of processing in the human visual system,” Nature, vol. 381, no. 6582, pp. 520–522, 1996.
Copyright © 2016 Hong Gi Yeom et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.