Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 486125, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/486125
Research Article

patGPCR: A Multitemplate Approach for Improving 3D Structure Prediction of Transmembrane Helices of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors

1School of Computer Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
2Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Information Processing Technologies, Suzhou 215006, China
3School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China

Received 5 November 2012; Revised 10 January 2013; Accepted 16 January 2013

Academic Editor: Hong-Bin Shen

Copyright © 2013 Hongjie Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Fillmore, “It’s a GPCR world,” Modern Drug Discovery, vol. 11, pp. 24–28, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  2. V. Cherezov, D. M. Rosenbaum, M. A. Hanson et al., “High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human β2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5854, pp. 1258–1265, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. Kufareva, M. Rueda, V. Katritch et al., “Status of GPCR modeling and docking as reflected by community-wide GPCR Dock 2010 assessment,” Structure, vol. 19, pp. 1108–1126, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Michino, J. Chen, R. C. Stevens, and C. L. Brooks, “FoldGPCR: structure prediction protocol for the transmembrane domain of G proteincoupled receptors from class A,” Proteins, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 2189–2201, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Katritch, M. Rueda, P. C. H. Lam, M. Yeager, and R. Abagyan, “GPCR 3D homology models for ligand screening: lessons learned from blind predictions of adenosine A2a receptor complex,” Proteins, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 197–211, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Zhang, M. E. Devries, and J. Skolnick, “Structure modeling of all identified G protein-coupled receptors in the human genome,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 88–99, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. de Graaf, N. Foata, O. Engkvist, and D. Rognan, “Molecular modeling of the second extracellular loop of G-protein coupled receptors and its implication on structure-based virtual screening,” Proteins, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 599–620, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. W. Hildebrand, A. Goede, R. A. Bauer et al., “SuperLooper—a prediction server for the modeling of loops in globular and membrane proteins,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. W571–W574, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Sun, X. Zeng, C. Yan et al., “Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of glucose transporters GLUT1-4,” Nature, vol. 490, pp. 361–366, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  10. T. A. Hopf, L. J. Colwell, R. Sheridan et al., “Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing,” Cell, vol. 149, pp. 1607–1621, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. L. Bordoli, F. Kiefer, K. Arnold, P. Benkert, J. Battey, and T. Schwede, “Protein structure homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL workspace,” Nature Protocols, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Sybyl-X, Version 1. 0, Tripos, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 2009.
  13. Prime, Version 1.6, Schrodinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  14. A. Sali and T. L. Blundell, “Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 779–815, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Petrey, Z. Xiang, C. L. Tang et al., “Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling,” Proteins, vol. 53, supplement 6, pp. 430–435, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Levitt, “Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 507–533, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. A. Bates, L. A. Kelley, R. M. MacCallum, and M. J. E. Sternberg, “Enhancement of protein modeling by human intervention in applying the automatic programs 3D-JIGSAW and 3D-PSSM,” Proteins, vol. 45, supplement 5, pp. 39–46, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Koehl and M. Delarue, “Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 239, no. 2, pp. 249–275, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. V. Yarov-Yarovoy, J. Schonbrun, and D. Baker, “Multipass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta,” Proteins, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1010–1025, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Barth, J. Schonbrun, and D. Baker, “Toward high-resolution prediction and design of transmembrane helical protein structures,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 40, pp. 15682–15687, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. N. Cavasotto and S. S. Phatak, “Homology modeling in drug discovery: current trends and applications,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 14, no. 13-14, pp. 676–683, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Cheng, “A multi-template combination algorithm for protein comparative modeling,” BMC Structural Biology, vol. 8, article 18, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Liu, M. Guerquin, and R. Samudrala, “Improving the accuracy of template-based predictions by mixing and matching between initial models,” BMC Structural Biology, vol. 8, article 24, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Q. Lü, X. Xia, R. Chen et al., “When the lowest energy does not induce native structures: parallel minimization of multi-energy values by hybridizing searching intelligences,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e44967, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  25. Q. Lü, H. Wu, J. Wu, X. Huang, X. Luo, and P. Qian, “A parallel ant colonies approach to de novo prediction of protein backbone in CASP8/9,” Science China Information Sciences. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. R. J. Lefkowitz, “The superfamily of heptahelical receptors,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. E133–E136, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. G. Claros and G. von Heijne, “TopPred II: an improved software for membrane protein structure predictions,” Computer Applications in the Biosciences, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 685–686, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. uniprot, 2012, http://www.uniprot.org/.
  29. K. Hofmann and W. Stoffel, “Tmbase—a database of membrane spanning proteins segments,” Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler, vol. 374, no. 166, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  30. G. E. Tusnády and I. Simon, “The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server,” Bioinformatics, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 849–850, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Krogh, B. Larsson, G. von Heijne, and E. L. L. Sonnhammer, “Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 567–580, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Viklund and A. Elofsson, “OCTOPUS: improving topology prediction by two-track ANN-based preference scores and an extended topological grammar,” Bioinformatics, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 1662–1668, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. S. Soto, M. Fasnacht, J. Zhu, L. Forrest, and B. Honig, “Loop modeling: sampling, filtering, and scoring,” Proteins, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 834–843, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. S. Rapp, T. Strauss, A. Nederveen, and G. Fuentes, “Prediction of protein loop geometries in solution,” Proteins, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Zhu, D. L. Pincus, S. Zhao, and R. A. Friesner, “Long loop prediction using the protein local optimization program,” Proteins, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 438–452, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. J. Mandell, E. A. Coutsias, and T. Kortemme, “Sub-angstrom accuracy in protein loop reconstruction by robotics-inspired conformational sampling,” Nature Methods, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 551–552, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Wang, P. Bradley, and D. Baker, “Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 373, no. 2, pp. 503–519, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. Gront and A. Kolinski, “BioShell—a package of tools for structural biology computations,” Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 621–622, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Venclovas and M. Margelevicius, “Comparative modeling in CASP6 using consensus approach to template selection, sequence-structure alignment, and structure assessment,” Proteins, vol. 61, supplement 7, pp. 99–105, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Al-Lazikani, F. B. Sheinerman, and B. Honig, “Combining multiple structure and sequence alignments to improve sequence detection and alignment: application to the SH2 domains of Janus kinases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 26, pp. 14796–14801, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus