Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2013 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 427141 | 5 pages |

An Unexpected Complete Remission of Advanced Intestinal-Type Vulvar Adenocarcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Case Report and a Literature Review

Academic Editor: R. Shaco-Levy
Received11 Aug 2013
Accepted25 Sep 2013
Published06 Nov 2013


Vulvar cancer represents approximately 3%–5% of all gynecological malignancies. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most frequent histotype, whereas melanomas, adenocarcinomas, basal cell carcinomas, and sarcomas are much less common. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma is a rare variant of vulvar carcinoma with only few cases found in the literature. The origin of this neoplasia is still much debated, but the most reliable hypothesis is the origin from cloacal remnants that may persist in the adult in different organs. Because of its extremely low incidence, the optimal management of this kind of vulvar cancer is still debated. We report the case of a woman affected by advanced intestinal-type vulvar adenocarcinoma, who achieved a complete clinical and pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment with platinum and paclitaxel.

1. Introduction

Vulvar cancer (VC) represents approximately 3%–5% of all gynecological malignancies [1]. It affects 17.3% of women aged 30–49 years, 32.1% of women aged 50–69 years, and 47.6% of women aged more than 70 years. Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) account for 80% of cases, whereas melanomas, adenocarcinomas, basal cell carcinomas, and sarcomas are much less common. Vulvar adenocarcinomas mostly originate from Bartholin’s glands [26], but rarely from sweat glands, Skene’s glands, minor vestibular glands, aberrant mammary tissue, or endometriotic implants. They are characterized by a remarkable poorer 5-year survival rate when compared with squamous histotype (32% versus 65% for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell VC, resp.). Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma is a rare variant of vulvar carcinoma with only few cases found in the literature [28]. The origin of this neoplasia is still much debated, but the most reliable hypothesis is the origin from cloacal remnants that may persist in the adult in different organs outside the gastrointestinal tract. Similar adenocarcinomas are also found in the uterine cervix and vagina, and the diagnosis is based on the presence of goblet cells or colorectal morphology and “intestinal-type” immunohistochemical phenotype. Because of its extremely low incidence and very few reports available in the literature till date, the optimal management of these patients is still debated.

Hereby, we report the case of a woman affected by advanced intestinal-type vulvar adenocarcinoma, who achieved a complete clinical and pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment with platinum and paclitaxel.

2. Case Presentation

A 57-year-old woman referred to our institution complaining of a vulvar mass associated with bleeding from external genitals for 3 months. On recovery at our department, she was submitted to an accurate physical examination, which revealed an easily bleeding dome-shaped vulvar lesion on the right major labium measuring 5 cm in diameter, which involved the caudal portion of the vagina and the posterior vulvar fork. Moreover, a palpable lymph node was found in the ipsilateral inguinal area. Blood exams revealed mild anemia but were negative for other abnormalities. The patient was extremely in pain at gynecological examination and she was submitted to rectovaginal examination under narcosis, which confirmed extension of the disease (FIGO stage III). Multiple biopsies of the lesion and nearer tissues were performed with histological finding of a moderately differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma of the vulva ulcerating the surface epithelium. The neoplastic glands showed a colorectal morphology. The immunohistochemical pattern was strongly positive for cytokeratin 20, CEA, CDX2, and p16, with weak and focal positivity for cytokeratin 7, while vimentin and estrogen receptors were negative (Table 1). These findings, along with the microscopical features of the tumor, were supportive for “intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the vulva” (also known as “adenocarcinoma of cloacogenic origin”). Gastroenteric endoscopy and colonoscopy failed to show suspected lesions. Serum tumoral markers (AFP, CEA, CA125, CA15.3, and CA19.9) were all within normal limits. The abdomen-pelvic computed tomography (CT) revealed an enlarged area in the right vulvovaginal wall (Figure 1(a)) and right inguinal enlarged lymph node, measuring 2 cm in the largest diameter. Because of the advanced stage of disease close to the urethra, anus, and vagina, a neoadjuvant chemotherapic treatment was proposed to the patient. After adequate patient counseling and signing informed consent, three cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 were administrated every 3 weeks. Neither adverse events nor high-grade chemotherapeutic toxicity was reported. On physical examination, performed after the third cycle of chemotherapy, the vulvar lesion was markedly reduced and this finding was confirmed at abdomen-pelvic CT scan, which showed no evidence of the disease (Figure 1(b)), with regression of inguinal lymphadenopathy. The patient underwent surgical excision of the vulvar lesion with en bloc removal of a vaginal segment measuring 4.5 cm in length plus adjacent vulvar skin and right groin dissection. At macroscopic histological examination, a vulvar nodule measuring 1.5 cm in diameter was found; microscopically, this lesion presented pathological and immunohistochemical features of vulvar adenocarcinoma of colorectal type (Figures 2(a)-2(b)). The tumor invaded up to the subcutaneous adipose tissue, with free surgical margins and negative superficial and deep inguinal lymph nodes. No major perioperative complications were recorded. The patient was earlier discharged and she is still alive with no evidence of disease 4 months after the surgery.

Author, yearPTS ageSurgical treatmentAdjuvant treatmentImmunohistochemical patternPFS (months)

Tiltman and Knutzen, 1978 [5]50Modified RV + GDNRNot performed12
Kennedy and Majmudar, 1993 [3]Case  1: 54 years
Case  2: 63 years
RV + bilateral GD
Wide LE
Willen et al., 1999 [6]57Wide LENRCK17+
Broad CK+
Polyclonal CEA+−
Chromogranin A+−
Nasir et al., 2001 [4]43EV + bilateral GDNRCEA+
Broad CK+
Rodriguez et al., 2001 [7]69Wide LENRCK7+
OC125 apical
CEA apical
OC19.9 apical
Liu et al., 2003 [9]49LE + bilateral GDNRNot performed24
Dubè et al., 2004 [8]58Radical EV + ipsilateral GDNRCK20+−
Ghamande et al., 1995 [2]67RV + bilateral GDNRCEA+17
Cormio et al., 2012 [10]Case  1: 58 years
Case  2: 42 years
CK 20+−
Karkouche et al., 2012 [11]31LENRCK 20+
CK 7−
Our case57NACT + LE + ipsilateral GRCK 20+
CDX2+ focal
CK 7−

LE: local excision, E: emivulvectomy, RV: radical vulvectomy, GD: groin dissection, NACT: neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NR: not reported.

3. Discussion

“Intestinal-type” vulvar adenocarcinoma is a very uncommon neoplasia and, consequently, its clinical behavior and prognosis are poorly understood and studied. Only few cases of this variant of vulvar adenocarcinoma have been previously described (Table 1) [211]. The majority of them arose in the vestibular region and only once showed metastatic lymph node disease [10]. No well-established diagnostic and therapeutic criteria have been proposed, as most of the reported cases focused their attention on the histopathological and immunophenotypical features of the tumor. Most of the cases showed a polypoid macroscopic appearance and villoglandular microscopic features, with occasional or abundant goblet or Paneth cells. As for all the described vulvar intestinal-type adenocarcinomas, our case reports a tumor arising in continuity with the epidermis, but unrelated to the underlying mucous glands. It stained positive for cytokeratin 20 (Figure 2(c)), CDX2, and CEA, as colonic cancers do, but was also immunoreactive for cytokeratin 7 and p16, which are characteristic for the female genital tract neoplasms [12]. We are not aware of other vulvar intestinal cancers expressing CDX2, as this marker was not investigated in the published studies. Nuclear CDX2 immunoreactivity is found in small and large intestinal epithelium. Wherever others will confirm its expression in this subtype of vulvar adenocarcinoma, it would represent a confirmation of the cloacal origin of these neoplasms. Similar to this case, cervical invasive intestinal-type adenocarcinomas show diffuse expression of CDX2, CK20, CEA, and p16. They preserve their CK7 immunoreactivity and are usually p16 positive [13].

Interestingly, the positivity of the present tumor for p16 suggests that vulvar intestinal-type adenocarcinoma could be associated with high-risk HPV. Furthermore, as described earlier, no increased serum tumoral markers (AFP, CEA, CA125, CA15.3, and CA19.9) have been found in our case, consistently with reports previously described in the literature [46, 810].

The clinical behavior of this rare malignant cancer seems to be rather indolent, with progression-free interval ranging from 12 to 120 months [211]. Generally, patients affected by this neoplasia underwent different surgical options like radical vulvectomy with unilateral or bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy [13] or unilateral emivulvectomy with radical groin lymph node dissection [14, 15] or wide excision of the lesion in case of very small tumors (<2 cm). Lymph node metastasis was demonstrated in only one case reported by Cormio et al. [10]. Data coming from reports available in the literature suggest a good response to surgical and chemotherapeutic treatments even if most of them will relapse. According to our findings, Cormio et al. reported on an advanced well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of intestinal-type of the vulva with complete response to first-line chemotherapy but with a recurrence-free interval of 6 months, thus suggesting an initial therapeutic role of chemotherapy in these cases [10]. Several authors have recently advocated the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery as a compelling option for vulvar cancer patients, capable of reducing the need for demolitive and disfiguring surgery by decreasing the tumor volume and minimizing perioperative complications with the aim of improving the quality of life of these patients. Rationale for platinum-paclitaxel association is strong and comes from both in vitro and clinical studies. In fact, it has been demonstrated that, despite considerably different mechanisms of action, these two drugs can, when appropriately sequenced, augment the effects of each other; it has also been shown that this association can have a supra-additive growth-inhibitory effect on ovarian carcinoma cell lines and a clear additive or supra-additive cytotoxic effect on the vulvar SCC cell lines [16].

According to our experience and the good response to chemotherapy reported until now for this setting of tumors, we could consider neoadjuvant platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy followed by surgery as a valuable option for advanced vulvar intestinal-type adenocarcinoma not susceptible to primary surgical treatment. Both pathologists and gynecologic oncologists should be aware of the existence of this rare tumor. However, more cases with longer follow-up period are needed to fully understand its origin and better establish the biomolecular pattern of the disease, to elucidate the best therapeutic management and its long-term prognosis.

Conflict of Interests

All authors declare no conflict of interests.


  1. P. L. Judson, E. B. Habermann, N. N. Baxter, S. B. Durham, and B. A. Virnig, “Trends in the incidence of invasive and in situ vulvar carcinoma,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 1018–1022, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. A. Ghamande, J. Kasznica, C. Thomas Griffiths, N. J. Finkler, and A. M. Hamid, “Mucinous adenocarcinomas of the vulva,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 117–120, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. C. Kennedy and B. Majmudar, “Primary adenocarcinoma of the vulva, possibly cloacogenic: a report of two cases,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 113–116, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  4. S. Nasir, H. Zaidi, and M. G. Conner, “Primary vulvar adenocarcinoma of cloacogenic origin,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 744–746, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. J. Tiltman and V. K. Knutzen, “Primary adenocarcinoma of the vulva originating in misplaced cloacal tissue,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 51, no. 1, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  6. R. Willen, Z. Be kassy, B. Carlen, B. Bozoky, and S. Cajander, “Cloacogenic adenocarcinoma of the vulva,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 74, p. 298, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. Rodriguez, M. A. Isaac, E. Hidalgo, B. Márquez, and F. F. Nogales, “Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the vulva,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 409–411, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. V. Dubé, C. Veilleux, M. Plante, and B. Têtu, “Primary villoglandular adenocarcinoma of cloacogenic origin of the vulva,” Human Pathology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 377–379, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S.-H. Liu, C.-M. Ho, S.-H. Huang, B.-Y. Shih, and F.-K. Lee, “Cloacogenic adenocarcinoma of the vulva presenting as recurrent Bartholin's gland infection,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 49–51, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  10. G. Cormio, C. Carriero, V. Loizzi et al., “‘Intestinal-type’ mucinous adenocarcinoma of the vulva: a report of two cases,” European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 433–435, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  11. R. Karkouche, F. Ansart, B. Terris, M. C. Lavenu, and F. Plantier, “Multiple tubulovillous adenomas of the vulva,” American Journal of Dermatopathology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 321–324, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. S. Loy, R. D. Calaluce, and G. L. Keeney, “Cytokeratin immunostaining in differentiating primary ovarian carcinoma from metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma,” Modern Pathology, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1040–1044, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  13. W. G. McCluggage, R. Shah, L. E. Connolly, and H. A. McBride, “Intestinal-type cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma exhibit a partial enteric immunophenotype with consistent expression of CDX2,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 92–100, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. A. de Hullu, I. A. M. van der Avoort, M. H. M. Oonk, and A. G. J. van der Zee, “Management of vulvar cancers,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 825–831, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. B. Stehman, B. N. Bundy, P. M. Dvoretsky, and W. T. Creasman, “Early stage I carcinoma of the vulva treated with ipsilateral superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy and modified radical hemivulvectomy: a prospective study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 490–497, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M. Raitanen, V. Rantanen, J. Kulmala, H. Helenius, R. Grénman, and S. Grénman, “Supra-additive effect with concurrent paclitaxel and cisplatin in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in vitro,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 238–243, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Angela Musella et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1110 Views | 686 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder