Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 191426, 2 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191426
Letter to the Editor

Comment on “Intrapartum Intrauterine Fetal Demise with Normal Umbilical Cord Blood Gas Values at Birth”

Pediatrics, UCLA, 351 W. Northridge Avenue, Glendora, CA 91741-2036, USA

Received 27 February 2015; Accepted 26 March 2015

Academic Editor: Julio Rosa-e-Silva

Copyright © 2015 Jeffrey J. Pomerance. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


I read with interest “Intrapartum Intrauterine Fetal Demise with Normal Umbilical Cord Blood Gas Values at Birth,” by Michael D. Benson [1]. I am most pleased that Dr. Benson was willing to share the fetal monitor strips which show the following highlights:(i)Initial baseline fetal heart rate of 140 beats per minute (bpm) with normal variability and accelerations.(ii)Intermittent variable and prolonged decelerations.(iii)Beginning three hours prior to delivery, increasing frequency and severity of variable decelerations associated with every instance of maternal pushing.(iv)Fifty minutes prior to delivery, a prolonged deceleration of eight minutes followed by a fetal heart rate of 160–190 bpm.(v)Fetal heart rate tracing ends 27 minutes prior to delivery at 190 bpm.Apgar scores were 01/05/010/020.Cord gases were reported as (base excesses transposed in Table 1, correctly identified in text)(i)vein: 7.27/48/<25/−10 (pH/PCO2/PO2/BE);(ii)artery: 7.13/64/<25/−5.Although the title of this report calls the cord gas results “normal,” they are not. The arterial umbilical cord gas base excess of minus 10 is mildly abnormal [2, 3]. Further, the venoarterial pH difference of 0.14 is widened [4]. Terminal fetal bradycardia with widened pH differences is associated with both cord compression (common) [5, 6] and chronic fetal heart failure (rare) [7]. Typically, in chronic fetal heart failure, fetal heart rate variability is decreased throughout the fetal heart rate tracing and variable decelerations are not associated with the tracing. Therefore, this second option seems highly unlikely. The first option, cord compression with terminal fetal bradycardia, seems quite likely as there was evidence of cord compression (increasing frequency and severity of variable decelerations) and the presence of a widened pH difference in the cord gases. In cord occlusion, a widened pH difference is due to temporary restoration of umbilical cord arterial blood flow secondary to fetal hypertension. Although no evidence of cord compression was found at the time of cesarean delivery, occult cord compression is only identified if the cord happens to be directly below the uterine incision, as it is in only the minority of occurrences. The severe variable decelerations attest to the presence of impingement on the cord. A report [8] of cord blood gases associated with cord prolapse in a stillborn baby found values extremely similar (vein: 7.24/55/20/−5; artery: 7.10/71/8/−10) to those reported by Benson.

Cord occlusion with terminal fetal bradycardia and near-normal cord gases may occur in the absence of a widened venoarterial pH difference, although this finding is quite rare [9]. In order to establish cord compression with terminal fetal bradycardia as the likely etiology of neonatal depression in the absence of a widened venoarterial pH difference, one must demonstrate preceding evidence of a vulnerable cord, the presence of normal or near-normal venous and arterial cord gases, and a postresuscitation blood gas that has a much worse base deficit.

Cord gases only reflect uteroplacental status (vein) and uteroplacental-fetal status (arteries) while blood flow continues.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. M. D. Benson, “Intrapartum intrauterine fetal demise with normal umbilical cord blood gas values at birth,” Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2015, Article ID 318350, 3 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. E. R. Yeomans, J. C. Hauth, L. C. Gilstrap III, and D. M. Strickland, “Umbilical cord pH, Pco2, and bicarbonate following uncomplicated term vaginal deliveries,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 151, no. 6, pp. 798–800, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. J. Pomerance, Interpreting Umbilical Cord Blood Gases, BNMG, Glendora, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2012, http://www.cordgases.com.
  4. J. J. Pomerance, “Case 6, blood gas samples from one vessel or two?” in Interpreting Umbilical Cord Blood Gases, p. 49, BNMG, Glendora, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2012, http://www.cordgases.com/. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. J. Pomerance, “Section 6, cord occlusion with terminal fetal bradycardia,” in Interpreting Umbilical Cord Blood Gases, pp. 63–117, BNMG, Glendora, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2012, http://www.cordgases.com/. View at Google Scholar
  6. N. A. Tejani, L. I. Mann, and M. Sanghavi, “The association of umbilical cord complications and variable decelerations with acid-base findings,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 159–162, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. J. Pomerance, “Section 7, fetal circulatory failure,” in Interpreting Umbilical Cord Blood Gases, pp. 119–152, BNMG, Glendora, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2012, http://www.cordgases.com/. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. J. Pomerance, “Case 16, cord prolapse,” in Interpreting Umbilical Cord Blood Gases, pp. 99–102, BNMG, Glendora, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2012, http://www.cordgases.com/. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. J. Pomerance, “Case 15, cord occlusion without widened venoarterial cord gas differences,” in Interpreting Umbilical Cord Blood Gases, pp. 93–98, BNMG, Glendora, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2012, http://www.cordgases.com/. View at Google Scholar