Case Report | Open Access
Naoki Matsuoka, Hiruma Hasebe, Tetsuji Mayama, Takeo Fukuchi, "Sub-Tenon Injections of Triamcinolone Acetonide Had Limited Effect on Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound-Paclitaxel (Abraxane)", Case Reports in Ophthalmological Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 181269, 4 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/181269
Sub-Tenon Injections of Triamcinolone Acetonide Had Limited Effect on Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound-Paclitaxel (Abraxane)
Purpose. To report the first case of cystoid macular edema (CME) induced by nanoparticle albumin-bound- (nab-) paclitaxel treated with sub-Tenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) with detailed long-term follow-up. Case. A 39-year-old Japanese woman with breast cancer presents with decreased vision in both eyes while receiving nab-paclitaxel. Two STTA treatments were administered for persistent CME in her right eye. Central retinal thickness (CRT) of the treated eye decreased after the first STTA, but there was no change after the second STTA. CRT of the other eye and bilateral visual acuity (VA) showed no change after each treatment. However, this patient experienced gradual recovery of visual function after nab-paclitaxel treatment was completed, 3 months after the second STTA. Improvements in VA and CRT did not overlap in time. Moreover, there was a big improvement time lag in VA between the eyes. Conclusion. Cessation of nab-paclitaxel could lead to resolution of CME more than STTA, although STTA had some effect. Since nab-paclitaxel has been recently approved for treating more types of malignancies, the number of the patients with this CME is expected to increase in the near future. Patients and physicians should understand this side effect and prepare for other treatment options.
Nanoparticle albumin-bound- (nab-) paclitaxel (Abraxane; Abraxis BioScience, Los Angeles, CA, USA) is used to treat various malignancies. It is associated with fewer hypersensitivity reactions than other medications in the taxane class and does not require the additional use of steroids and antihistamines. Bilateral cystoid macular edema (CME) is known to be a rare side effect of nab-paclitaxel. Several reports have described that intravitreal injections of bevacizumab , topical dorzolamide , topical steroids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs , which are used to treat typical CME, have little effect on CME induced by nab-paclitaxel. Cessation of the drug can lead to improvements in visual function [4, 5]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of nab-paclitaxel-induced CME treated with posterior sub-Tenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) with detailed long-term follow-up.
2. Case Report
A 39-year-old Japanese woman with breast cancer had a 4-month history of decreased vision in both eyes. She had been receiving nab-paclitaxel for approximately 12 months at a dose of 400 mg (260 mg/m2) every 3 weeks at the time of her initial visit to our hospital. Baseline decimal visual acuity (VA) was 0.4 in the right eye and 0.6 in the left. There were no signs of intraocular inflammation or cataracts. Fluorescein angiography (FA) showed minimal leakage in the macular area of both eyes (Figures 1(a)–1(d)) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) revealed bilateral CME (Figures 1(e) and 1(f)). Since this patient did not take any other drugs associated with CME, she was diagnosed with nab-paclitaxel-induced CME.
STTA (20 mg) was administered for persistent CME in the right eye 3 months later and a second STTA procedure (20 mg) occurred 5 months after her initial visit. Although her subjective symptoms improved slightly, there was no appreciable change in VA after the 2 STTA treatments. Her right central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 645 to 533 μm after the first STTA treatment. In contrast, CRT of the untreated left eye remained relatively constant, from 577 to 556 μm, during the same period. However, CRT in both eyes did not decrease after the second STTA treatment (Figure 2(a)).
(a) Right and left central retinal thickness
(b) Right and left decimal visual acuity
Three months after the second STTA treatment, nab-paclitaxel treatment concluded after 23 courses because her physical status had improved. She experienced gradual recovery of her visual function after cessation of nab-paclitaxel. VA in the right eye recovered slowly to 1.0 at 11 months after nab-paclitaxel cessation. VA in the left eye improved more rapidly to 1.2 at 5 months after cessation (Figure 2(b)). SD-OCT revealed complete resolution of CME at 5 months after cessation in the right eye and at 6 months in the left (Figures 1(g)–1(n)). There were no significant differences in central sensitivity between the eyes with critical flicker-fusion frequency testing and Humphrey visual field testing at 9 and 11 months after the second STTA treatment, respectively.
Decreased CRT in the treated right eye after the first STTA treatment may represent a minor anatomic response. However, this effectiveness was limited, as evidenced by the lack of change in VA and the reaction to the second STTA treatment. Cessation of nab-paclitaxel led to the resolution of CME more so than STTA therapy in this case.
After cessation of nab-paclitaxel, the timing of improvements in VA and CRT did not coincide. In addition, there was a big improvement time lag in VA between the eyes. The pathogenesis of CME in this patient was not clear. There is no definitive explanation of the VA and CRT results, but improvements in visual function over time and anatomic changes do not always overlap in conditions such as CME secondary to retinal vein occlusion and age-related macular degeneration. Asymmetric spontaneous resolution and the effect of STTA treatment are possible explanations of the time lag between the eyes. The right eye might have developed CME first and was more impaired at her initial visit. Nab-paclitaxel treatment for more than one year, which is longer than in previous reports [1, 3, 5], may be a potential dose-dependent risk factor for irreversible side effects.
One proposed mechanism for the pathogenesis of this type of CME is that nab-paclitaxel may be toxic to the Mueller cells, leading to intracellular fluid accumulation and subclinical leakage of extracellular fluid . Some reports [5, 7] on fluid retention syndrome (FRS) [8, 9] suggest that increased capillary fluid filtration leads to capillary protein leakage and edema. However, our patient had no evidence of systemic FRS.
Paclitaxel is an antineoplastic agent in the taxane class. It targets the microtubule network in cells, which is essential for mitosis and interphase cell function [5, 10]. Paclitaxel has been shown to disrupt the microtubule structure in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells by preventing microtubule disassembly, thereby blocking many microtubule-dependent processes in the RPE [11, 12]. Elevated viscosity of the exudates could be an obstacle to the diffusion of fluorescein, resulting in the absence of hyperfluorescence . There are several hypothesized explanations for this type of CME with no or minimal leakage: the rate of fluid egress may be too slow to be detected by FA, or the blood-ocular barrier may be selectively impaired to molecules smaller than fluorescein .
Long-term cystic accumulation of fluid in the outer retina can cause irreversible visual function loss. There was no significant difference in FA, OCT findings, and results of other examinations between the eyes. The time frame to resolution of CME according to SD-OCT for this patient was similar to that of previously reported cases [1, 3, 5], which ranged from 3 to 4 months after the cessation of nab-paclitaxel.
Corticosteroids have a stabilizing effect on vascular permeability and reduce inflammatory reactions . In recent years, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) as an adjunct therapy for some types of macular edema has yielded promising results [14–16]. However, IVTA may provoke severe ocular complications such as endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and secondary glaucoma [17, 18]. STTA is reported to be an alternative method that might provide a comparable effect to the IVTA with fewer complications [19, 20]. In our patient, STTA was chosen because of its stabilizing effect on vascular permeability and a safer adverse effect profile than IVTA.
In this case, CME did not resolve as we expected because the ability of TA to stabilize vascular permeability was not sufficient in the setting of no definitive evidence of intraocular inflammation.
Nab-paclitaxel was initially approved only for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, but it has been recently approved for gastric, non-small-cell lung, and pancreatic cancer. Therefore, the number of the patients with this type of CME is expected to increase in the near future. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying nab-paclitaxel-induced CME is needed, especially in patients with limited systemic treatment options for metastatic cancer. Patients and physicians should understand this side effect and prepare for other treatment options.
The patient has consented to the submission of this case report to the journal.
Conflict of Interests
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
- H. T. Rahman, S. Yeh, and C. S. Bergstrom, “Cystoid macular edema without leakage secondary to nab-Paclitaxel (Abraxane): clinical experience with intravitreal bevacizumab,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 360–362, 2013.
- J. P. Ehlers, H. Rayess, and N. Steinle, “Topical dorzolamide therapy for taxane-related macular oedema,” Eye, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 102–104, 2013.
- C. G. Murphy, J. B. Walsh, C. A. Hudis, D. Lake, and M. Theodoulou, “Cystoid macular edema secondary to nab-paclitaxel therapy,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 33, pp. e684–e687, 2010.
- Y. Tanaka, H. Bando, H. Hara, Y. Ito, and Y. Okamoto, “Cystoid macular edema induced by nab-paclitaxel,” Breast Cancer, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 324–326, 2015.
- S. V. Smith, M. S. Benz, and D. M. Brown, “Cystoid macular edema secondary to albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 126, no. 11, pp. 1605–1606, 2008.
- J. B. Jonas and A. Söfker, “Intraocular injection of crystalline cortisone as adjunctive treatment of diabetic macular edema,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 425–427, 2001.
- E. Rahimy and D. Sarraf, “Cystoid macular edema secondary to nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy,” Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 187–189, 2013.
- A. Martidis, J. S. Duker, P. B. Greenberg et al., “Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema,” Ophthalmology, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 920–927, 2002.
- D. M. Moshfeghi, P. K. Kaiser, I. U. Scott et al., “Acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 791–796, 2003.
- J. B. Jonas, I. Kreissig, and R. Degenring, “Secondary chronic open-angle glaucoma after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 729–730, 2003.
- C. J. Helm and G. N. Holland, “The effects of posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients with intermediate uveitis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 55–64, 1995.
- A. B. Thach, P. U. Dugel, R. J. Flindall, J. O. Sipperley, and S. R. Sneed, “A comparison of retrobulbar versus sub-Tenon's corticosteroid therapy for cystoid macular edema refractory to topical medications,” Ophthalmology, vol. 104, no. 12, pp. 2003–2008, 1997.
- D. Modi and S. R. Dubovy, “Non-leaking cystoid maculopathy secondary to systemic paclitaxel,” Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 183–186, 2013.
- M. J. Elman, L. P. Aiello, R. W. Beck et al., “Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 1064.e35–1077.e35, 2010.
- K. A. Semb, S. Aamdal, and P. Oian, “Capillary protein leak syndrome appears to explain fluid retention in cancer patients who receive docetaxel treatment,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3426–3432, 1998.
- D. G. Telander and D. Sarraf, “Cystoid macular edema with docetaxel chemotherapy and the fluid retention syndrome,” Seminars in Ophthalmology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 151–153, 2007.
- M. M. Joshi and B. R. Garretson, “Paclitaxel maculopathy,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 709–710, 2007.
- T. I. Kuznetcova, P. Cech, and C. P. Herbort, “The mystery of angiographically silent macular oedema due to taxanes,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 299–304, 2012.
- T. J. Mitchison, “Compare and contrast actin filaments and microtubules,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1309–1315, 1992.
- O. Yalcinbayir, O. Gelisken, B. Kaderli, and R. Avci, “Intravitreal versus sub-tenon posterior triamcinolone injection in bilateral diffuse diabetic macular edema,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 225, no. 4, pp. 222–227, 2011.
Copyright © 2015 Naoki Matsuoka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.