Case Reports in Veterinary Medicine

Case Reports in Veterinary Medicine / 2016 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 6957101 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6957101

M. Gallego, L. Avedillo, "Case Report of Bilateral 3-4 Metatarsal Syndactyly in a Pet Rabbit", Case Reports in Veterinary Medicine, vol. 2016, Article ID 6957101, 4 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6957101

Case Report of Bilateral 3-4 Metatarsal Syndactyly in a Pet Rabbit

Academic Editor: Renato L. Santos
Received22 Apr 2016
Accepted29 May 2016
Published19 Jun 2016

Abstract

We report the first case of spontaneous syndactyly reported in a pet rabbit. Syndactyly only caused an atypical gait in the rabbit. The radiological study revealed bilateral 3rd and 4th metatarsal bones fused in its entire length preserving normal joint surfaces resembling syndactyly type Ia. The cause of this congenital malformation was unknown.

1. Introduction

Syndactyly is a congenital malformation in which two or more fingers are joined because they fail to separate or fuse during limb development. The fusion of carpal, tarsal, metacarpal, and metatarsal bones is included in the term syndactyly, as they often occur together [1]. In human and veterinary medicine syndactyly has been classified into several types: simple, which affects only soft tissue; complex, involving synostosis; complete, involving entire length synostosis of the fused bones; incomplete, when synostosis does not comprise the entire bone length; complicated, when syndactyly appears with other malformations in the same individual; and uncomplicated if there are no more malformations [13].

Congenital syndactyly has been observed in dogs, cats, sheep, pigs, and cows [38]. Although in dogs and cats are cited isolated cases in the literature, it has been considered by some authors that syndactyly is hereditary in these species [2, 3]. Syndactyly in dogs can be complicated: in a family of Australian Shepherd dogs a multiple inherited teratologic syndrome that was lethal to males has been reported [7]. Although in sheep heritability has been suggested, it is in cows in the species in which hereditary syndactyly, in autosomal recessive form, is best described [4, 6, 8].

In humans syndactyly is associated with a mutation in the HoxD-13 gene in a syndrome called synpolydactyly, where bone fusions and duplications in hands and feet occur [9]. There are other causes of syndactyly in people; in fact, in more than 90 multiple malformation syndromes syndactyly is present [1, 10].

Mice genetically modified for experimental embryology have been employed to investigate the embryonic development of the limbs. In these studies syndactyly appeared in the offspring occasionally. Syndactyly was found both in mice lacking laminin alpha-5 chain gene and in mice null for fibrillin-2 gene. Retinoic acid receptor gene mutation in mouse also caused syndactyly. Inhibition of interdigital cell death was observed in functional cell proteins TGF Beta-2/TGF Beta-3 double knockout mice. Mice null for both Apaf1 and bax/bak, respectively, gene, and cell proteins implicated in apoptosis developed soft tissue syndactyly [11, 12].

In reference texts of pet rabbit medicine the following congenital conditions are cited: cryptorchidism, incisor malocclusion, spinal deformities, incomplete tracheal rings, splay leg, uterine malformations, renal agenesis, congenital cardiac disease, polycystic kidney disease, hereditary ataxia, glaucoma, cataracts, lymphoma, and cutaneous asthenia [1315]. However there are few congenital diseases described in pet rabbits; in the other conditions literature refers to laboratory rabbits or to observations in daily clinical practice. Except for the congenital incisor malocclusion, which is best described [16], there are only sparse case reports: two reports of congenital ventricular septal defects, one case of incomplete tracheal rings, various cases of cutaneous asthenia, one case of bilateral tibial agenesis, two cases of congenital uterine malformations, congenital cataracts, and one corneal dermoid [1726]. Syndactyly has not been reported in pet rabbits.

Previously, syndactyly has only been observed in laboratory rabbits on studies to assess the teratogenic effects in fetuses of different compounds administered to pregnant does. Vitamin A, 6-aminonicotinamide, hydroxyurea, thalidomide, and cyclophosphamide resulted in offspring syndactyly, in addition to other malformations [2730]. Syndactyly was induced in rabbits as a result of aberrant scarring after causing traumatic injury on fetuses in utero or caused by uterine puncture to obtain amniotic fluid [31, 32]. After an exhaustive literature review, the authors founded only a citation of spontaneous syndactyly in a laboratory rabbit, a fetus of New Zealand white rabbit that was part of one of the 33 malformated individuals from a total of 2821 control rabbits from a breeding laboratory colony [33].

2. Case Histories

A three-year-old mixed breed pet male rabbit weighing 1.6 kg was admitted in a veterinary surgeon for routine sterilization. During the consultation, the owner referred an unusual walking since he bought it in a store when it was 6 weeks old. A detailed physical examination revealed no abnormalities. A radiological study of the hindlimbs was accepted by the owner.

The radiological study showed bilateral 3rd and 4th metatarsal bones fused in its entire length preserving normal joint surfaces (Figure 1). The owner was informed of the unusual radiological findings and a comprehensive prechirurgical analytical profile was accepted.

Two blood samples were obtained. The first blood sample was obtained from the right saphenous vein for hematology (MS4 Vet®; Melet Schloesing) and biochemical profile (Chemray 120®; Rayto) and to obtain a serum sample for serology of Encephalitozoon cuniculi by indirect immunofluorescence in an external laboratory. The second blood sample was obtained from the left saphenous vein with a special heparinized syringe (PICO 50®; Radiometer) for the evaluation of blood gases and electrolytes in a gasometer (ABL80 Basic® FLEX, Radiometer).

A urinalysis was also performed. The urine was collected with a sterile syringe from a clean surface by manual expression of the bladder. Urinalysis consisted in determination of urine specific gravity by refractometry, protein : creatinine (UP/UCr), and gamma-glutamyl transferase : creatinine (GGTU/CrU) ratios as indicated in the literature [34, 35] and urine strip test (10 Combur test UX®; Roche) with an automatic tester (Urisys®; Roche).

The probes revealed the following alterations (Table 1): hyperglobulinemia, hypercalcemia, and increased UP/UCr. The antibody titer against Encephalitozoon cuniculi was positive, 1 : 640 [36].


ValueReference interval

Hematology (a)
Biochemistry
Globulins (g/dL)3,71,5–2,7 (b)
Calcium, total (mg/dL)14,411–14 (b)
Calcium, ionized (mmol/L)1,831,67–1,85 (c)
Urinalysis
SedimentTriple phosphateTriple phosphate, calcium oxalate, calcium carbonate (d)
Proteins (mg/dL)45,967,64–70,37 (e)
Creatinine (mg/dL)67,45
GGT (U/L)38,252,7–96,5 (f)
Ratio PU : CrU0,680,11–0,4 (e)/<0,6 (b)
Ratio GGT : CrU0,570,043–1,034 (f)

Value out of the reference interval.
(a) RBC, WBC, hemoglobin, and hematocrit value were within the reference interval for rabbits by Graham and Mader [47].
(b) Melillo 2007 [39]. ALT, ALP, total protein, albumin, BUN, creatinine, and phosphorus were within the reference interval for rabbits by Melillo [39].
(c) Ardiaca et al. 2013 [42]. Gasometry and electrolyte values (pH, , BEecf, AnGap, Na, K, and Cl) were within the reference interval for rabbits by Ardiaca et al. [42].
(d) Urine strip values were within the reference interval by Hoefer [43].
(e) Reusch et al. 2009 [34].
(f) Mancinelli et al. 2012 [35].

Orchiectomy and follow-up were uneventful. During anesthesia a complete radiological exam, previously approved by the owner, was performed and no other abnormalities were observed.

3. Discussion

The rabbit presented in this case report is the first case of spontaneous syndactyly in a domestic rabbit. Authors have done a comprehensive search in animal dysmorphology databases [37] resulting in the fact that this presented phenotype is not previously reported in rabbits and resembles syndactyly type Ia in humans [37, 38]. Syndactyly was complex, complete, and not complicated and only caused an atypical walking in the rabbit.

Hyperglobulinemia in rabbits has been associated with inflammatory or infectious processes; in this case the encephalitozoonosis can explain this finding [39].

Increased plasma total calcium was not considered relevant because the value of venous ionized calcium (iCa) was within the reference range [40]. Although iCa reference range for domestic rabbits was established in arterial blood it is assumed that there are no significant differences between arterial or venous samples [41, 42].

Raised UP/UCr ratio value (without active sediment) has been associated with renal damage in rabbits [34, 39, 43]. Although positive Encephalitozoon cuniculi titer does not always correspond with histological lesions [36] and elevated UP/UCr ratio has not been associated with the parasite in seropositive rabbits by Reusch et al. [34], the parasite can cause kidney damage, whereas it is considered transient and of little relevance [44]. Neither Encephalitozoon or other microsporidia have been associated with congenital malformations in animals or people [45].

Due to the absence of symptoms it was decided to evaluate kidney function in later visits, but the owner refused further testing. It is interesting to note that in human medicine syndactyly appears in numerous multiple malformation syndromes, some with renal impairment [10].

The etiology of syndactyly of this rabbit is difficult to assess but is linked to the embryology of the limbs. The development of fingers in rabbits occurs between 14 and 18 days of gestation [28, 46], after the limb bud and the digital rays appear. Although embryology of the limbs is complex and not fully understood, grossly these rays are composed of mesenchymal condensations that will form the digits after separating from each other by cell apoptosis [11, 12]. The authors aim that in that time interval an unknown etiologic agent (e.g., toxic, trauma, or genetic defect) acted. Exposition to environmental toxins or nonprescription products was unlikely in this case. Considering the symmetry of the syndactyly and the suspected etiology in other species a genetic origin is proposed by the authors. Although presented as an isolated malformation, the presence of other malformations in similar cases should be considered by the clinician.

Additional Points

The source is Centro Veterinario Madrid Exóticos.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. S. Malik, “Syndactyly: phenotypes, genetics and current classification,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 817–824, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. A. M. Towle and G. J. Breur, “Dysostoses of the canine and feline appendicular skeleton,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 225, no. 11, pp. 1685–1692, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. A. M. Towle, W. E. Blevins, L. R. Tuer, and G. J. Breur, “Syndactyly in a litter of cats,” Journal of Small Animal Practice, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 292–296, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. M. Dennis and H. W. Leipold, “Congenital dactylous malformations in sheep,” The Cornell Veterinarian, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 322–327, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  5. H. W. Leipold and S. M. Dennis, “Syndactyly in a pig,” The Cornell Veterinarian, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 269–273, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  6. L. Hart-Elcock, H. W. Leipold, and R. Baker, “Hereditary bovine syndactyly: diagnosis in bovine fetuses,” Veterinary Pathology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 140–147, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  7. L. E. Freeman, D. P. Sponenberg, and D. G. Schabdach, “Morphologic characterization of a heritable syndrome of cleft lip/palate, polydactyly, and tibial/fibular dysgenesis in Australian Shepherd dogs,” Anatomia Histologia Embryologia, vol. 17, article 81, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  8. I. Yeruham, T. Goshen, D. Lahav, and S. Perl, “Simultaneous occurrence of epitheliogenesis imperfecta with syndactyly in a calf and a lamb,” Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 149–150, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Sharpe, “HOX gene mutations—the wait is over,” Nature Medicine, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 748–749, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. Smith, K. Jones, M. Jones, and M. Del Campo, Smith's Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation, Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2013.
  11. V. Zuzarte-Luís and J. M. Hurlé, “Programmed cell death in the developing limb,” International Journal of Developmental Biology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 871–876, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. J. Sanz-Ezquerro and C. Tickle, “Digital development and morphogenesis,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. Quesenberry and J. Carpenter, Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents, Elsevier/Saunders, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 2012.
  14. A. Meredith and B. Lord, BSAVA Manual of Rabbit Medicine, British Small Animal Veterinary Association, Quedgeley, UK, 2014.
  15. M. Varga, Textbook of Rabbit Medicine, Elsevier, Edinburg, UK, 2014.
  16. E. Böhmer, “Diseases of the incisors,” in Dentistry in Rabbits and Rodents, E. Böhmer, Ed., pp. 118–152, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1st edition, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  17. K. N. Gelatt, “Congenital cataracts in a litter of rabbits,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 167, no. 7, pp. 598–599, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  18. R. G. Harvey, P. J. Brown, R. D. Young, and T. J. Whitbread, “A connective tissue defect in two rabbits similar to the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Veterinary Record, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 130–132, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  19. S. Damsch and C. Messow, “Tibial aplasia and agenesis in a rabbit (case report),” Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, vol. 98, no. 11, pp. 427–429, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  20. P. J. Brown, R. D. Young, and P. J. Cripps, “Abnormalities of collagen fibrils in a rabbit with a connective tissue defect similar to Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 346–350, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. D. Sinke, J. E. Van Dijk, and T. Willemse, “A case of Ehlers-Danlos-like syndrome in a rabbit with a review of the disease in other species,” Veterinary Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 182–185, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. Wagner, M. Brügmann, W. Drommer, and M. Fehr, “Corneal dermoid in a dwarf rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculi),” Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 39–40, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  23. S. Redrobe, “Imaging techniques in small mammals,” Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 187–197, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Deeb, “The dyspneic rabbit,” Exotic DVM, vol. 7, pp. 39–42, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  25. H. P. Thode III and M. S Johnston, “Probable congenital uterine developmental abnormalities in two domestic rabbits,” Veterinary Record, vol. 164, no. 8, pp. 242–244, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. N. Hildebrandt, C. Leuser, D. Miltz, E. Henrich, and M. Schneider, “Restrictive ventricular septal defect in a dwarf rabbit,” Tierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe K: Kleintiere/Heimtiere, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Fabro and R. L. Smith, “The teratogenic activity of thalidomide in the rabbit,” The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 511–519, 1966. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. A. Hartman, “The fetus in experimental technology,” in The Biology of the Laboratory Rabbit, S. Weisbroth, R. Flatt, and A. Kraus, Eds., p. 117, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  29. E. Ujházy, T. Balonová, M. Durisová, A. Gajdosík, J. Jansák, and A. Molnárová, “Teratogenicity of cyclophosphamide in New Zealand white rabbits,” Neoplasma, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. C. Hyoun, S. G. Običan, and A. R. Scialli, “Teratogen update: methotrexate,” Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 187–207, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. M. Clavert, A. Clavert, A. Berlizon, and P. Buck, “Abnormalities resulting from intra-adnexal injection of glucose in the rabbit embryo—an experimental model of ‘amniotic disease’,” Progress in Pediatric Surgery, vol. 12, pp. 143–164, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  32. A. Galvan, E. Alvarez, S. Parraguirre, M. L. Suarez, and A. Perez, “Development of a fetal rabbit model to study amniotic band syndrome,” Fetal and Pediatric Pathology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 300–308, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. D. Cozens, “Abnormalities of the external form and of the skeleton in the New Zealand white rabbit,” Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, vol. 3, pp. 695–700, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. B. Reusch, J. K. Murray, K. Papasouliotis, and S. P. Redrobe, “Urinary protein:creatinine ratio in rabbits in relation to their serological status to Encephalitozoon cuniculi,” Veterinary Record, vol. 164, no. 10, pp. 293–295, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. Mancinelli, D. J. Shaw, and A. L. Meredith, “γ-Glutamyl-transferase (GGT) activity in the urine of clinically healthy domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus),” Veterinary Record, vol. 171, no. 19, p. 475, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Csokai, A. Joachim, A. Gruber, A. Tichy, A. Pakozdy, and F. Künzel, “Diagnostic markers for encephalitozoonosis in pet rabbits,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 163, no. 1-2, pp. 18–26, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. OMIA, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals, http://omia.angis.org.au/home/.
  38. OMIM, “Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man,” http://www.omim.org/entry/609815. View at: Google Scholar
  39. A. Melillo, “Rabbit clinical pathology,” Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 135–145, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. A. Schenck, D. J. Chew, L. A. Nagode, and T. J. Rosol, “Disorders of calcium: hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia,” in Fluid, Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disorders in Small Animal Practice, S. P. DiBartola, Ed., pp. 120–194, Elsevier/Saunders, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 4th edition, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  41. R. Bilkovski, C. Cannon, S. Adhikari, and I. Nasr, “Arterial and venous ionized calcium measurements: is there a difference?” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 44, no. 4, p. S56, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Ardiaca, C. Bonvehí, and A. Montesinos, “Point-of-care blood gas and electrolyte analysis in rabbits,” Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 175–195, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. Hoefer, “Rabbit and ferret renal disease diagnosis,” in Laboratory Medicine: Avian and Exotic Pets, A. Fudge, Ed., pp. 311–318, Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1st edition, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  44. F. Künzel and A. Joachim, “Encephalitozoonosis in rabbits,” Parasitology Research, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 299–309, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. P. Ramanan and B. S. Pritt, “Extraintestinal microsporidiosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 3839–3844, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. P. Dyban, V. F. Puchkov, N. A. Samoshkina, L. I. Khozhai, N. A. Chebotar, and V. S. Baranov, “Chapter 12: laboratory mammals: mouse (Mus musculus), rat (Rattus norvergicus), rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), and golden hamster (Cricetus auratus),” in Animal Species for Developmental Studies, Volume II: Vertebrates, T. Dettlaff and F. Billett, Eds., pp. 351–442, Consultants Bureau, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  47. J. Graham and D. R. Mader, “Basic approach to veterinary care,” in Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents, K. Quesenberry and J. Carpenter, Eds., pp. 174–182, Elsevier/Saunders, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 3rd edition, 2012. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 M. Gallego and L. Avedillo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1160 Views | 400 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.